[00:00.000 --> 00:09.000]  You're listening to the Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist
[00:09.000 --> 00:15.240]  updates, online at thelibertybeats.com.
[00:15.240 --> 00:20.120]  John Bush here with your Liberty Beat from Monday, November 11, 2013.
[00:20.120 --> 00:29.880]  Gold opened today at $1283, silver at $21.35, and bitcoin is trading at $345.
[00:29.880 --> 00:34.080]  Support for the Liberty Beat comes from Cabo Bombs, Baja California style burritos.
[00:34.080 --> 00:39.720]  Visit their new location at 29th and Rio Grande between Guadalupe and Lamar.
[00:39.720 --> 00:46.520]  Call them at 512-432-1111 or find them online at cabobombs.com.
[00:46.520 --> 00:52.280]  Support also comes from Central Texas Gunworks, CHL courses, self-defense training, and firearm
[00:52.280 --> 00:53.280]  sales.
[00:53.280 --> 00:56.120]  Online at centraltexasgunworks.com.
[00:56.120 --> 01:01.280]  And now the news, why wait for police when you could do it yourself as a family?
[01:01.280 --> 01:05.760]  That's the mindset adopted by the family of a kidnapped Deucin Louisiana woman.
[01:05.760 --> 01:10.480]  They tracked her down, freed her, and killed her alleged abductor, identified as the father
[01:10.480 --> 01:11.480]  of her son.
[01:11.480 --> 01:15.080]  The family tells the advertiser they didn't know what to expect when showing up at the
[01:15.080 --> 01:17.680]  abandoned house they learned she was being held in.
[01:17.680 --> 01:21.800]  When they arrived early Friday, six family members kicked in the door and found the 29
[01:21.800 --> 01:23.760]  year old victim bloodied and stabbed.
[01:23.760 --> 01:28.800]  The alleged kidnapper Scott Thomas was there, gunfire erupted, and he was shot dead.
[01:28.800 --> 01:32.840]  The victim was transported for hospitalized treatment but is now back home.
[01:32.840 --> 01:38.440]  No charges will be filed in connection with Thomas' death.
[01:38.440 --> 01:41.880]  Lawyers for the Federal Election Commission have recommended that the commission approve
[01:41.880 --> 01:46.760]  the use of Bitcoins as in-kind contributions to federal campaign committees.
[01:46.760 --> 01:51.320]  The USA Today reports that under the recommendation, political committees would not be allowed
[01:51.320 --> 01:54.120]  to spend the money or donate it to others.
[01:54.120 --> 02:00.600]  Commission members are expected to address the issue during a meeting on Thursday.
[02:00.600 --> 02:04.640]  Inadequate security measures at the NSA is what allowed Edward Snowden to reveal the
[02:04.640 --> 02:06.720]  extent of U.S. spying.
[02:06.720 --> 02:11.520]  That word comes in a Reuters report that claims a handful of NSA employees gave their login
[02:11.520 --> 02:13.080]  information to Snowden.
[02:13.080 --> 02:17.040]  He apparently claimed the information was needed to do his job as a computer systems
[02:17.040 --> 02:18.040]  administrator.
[02:18.040 --> 02:22.880]  Support for the Liberty Beat comes from Brave New Books, your local source for Tangy Tangerine
[02:22.880 --> 02:28.920]  2.0, One World Way, and Clearly Filtered, in Austin at 1904 Guadalupe Street, and online
[02:28.920 --> 02:30.920]  at BraveNewBookstore.com.
[02:30.920 --> 02:35.440]  Support also comes from the Center for Natural Living, announcing their first monthly meeting,
[02:35.440 --> 02:38.480]  Saturday, November 23rd, at Brave New Books.
[02:38.480 --> 02:42.120]  The meeting will cover the Center's fluoride project, the volunteer opportunities at the
[02:42.120 --> 02:46.720]  Blush Family Farm, and will feature a screening of episodes 1 through 3 of Sovereign Living
[02:46.720 --> 02:47.720]  the Show.
[02:47.720 --> 02:51.640]  Learn more at CenterForNaturalLiving.org.
[02:51.640 --> 02:55.920]  You're listening to the Liberty Beat for Monday, November 11th, 2013.
[02:55.920 --> 03:25.040]  Be sure to like us on Facebook at Facebook.com slash The Liberty Beat.
[03:56.920 --> 04:00.920]  For all the people to see.
[04:00.920 --> 04:04.920]  That justice is one thing you should always find.
[04:04.920 --> 04:08.920]  You've got to settle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line.
[04:08.920 --> 04:15.920]  Let the gun folks settle to sing a victory tune, and we'll all meet back at the local
[04:15.920 --> 04:16.920]  snow.
[04:16.920 --> 04:21.920]  We'll raise up our glasses against evil forces singing.
[04:21.920 --> 04:27.920]  Whiskey for my men, beer for my horses.
[04:27.920 --> 04:29.920]  Good evening everybody.
[04:29.920 --> 04:33.920]  This is the Monday Night Will of Law Radio Traffic Show, and this is your host, Eddie
[04:33.920 --> 04:34.920]  Craig.
[04:34.920 --> 04:38.920]  It is November 11th, 2013.
[04:38.920 --> 04:45.920]  What I'd like to go over tonight, as much as possible, is how we've had some of our
[04:45.920 --> 04:55.920]  right to do certain things diminished by allegedly statutory enactments of our legislature.
[04:55.920 --> 05:00.920]  Now, out in the patronet community, there is all kinds of information out there about
[05:00.920 --> 05:05.920]  what statutes are and what statutes aren't, that it is law, that it's not law, and so
[05:05.920 --> 05:09.920]  on and so forth, to one degree or another.
[05:09.920 --> 05:15.920]  For the most part, they're correct in that statutes are not law in relation to that which
[05:15.920 --> 05:21.920]  our state and nation was founded, and that is under the common law.
[05:21.920 --> 05:26.920]  They're not the same thing, not by a long shot.
[05:26.920 --> 05:32.920]  Now, this begs the question, of course, of just exactly what kind of things are they
[05:32.920 --> 05:35.920]  doing in these enactments that I'm referring to.
[05:35.920 --> 05:39.920]  Well, one of the things I'm going to talk about tonight, or the thing I'm going to talk
[05:39.920 --> 05:44.920]  about tonight, is the power to resist an unlawful arrest.
[05:44.920 --> 05:51.920]  Now, when I first started doing a lot of the study on this, I read tons and tons of case
[05:51.920 --> 05:54.920]  law out of the Vernon's annotated civil statutes.
[05:54.920 --> 05:57.920]  I would read through the individual statutes.
[05:57.920 --> 06:03.920]  I would read the associated controlling case law associated with that statute.
[06:03.920 --> 06:07.920]  I would go down to Stephen F. Austin's Law Library, and I would look that information
[06:07.920 --> 06:11.920]  up online and read the actual cases.
[06:11.920 --> 06:18.920]  And all the way through the 60s, or at least up to the mid-60s, and even beyond that in
[06:18.920 --> 06:25.920]  some cases, the case law in Texas was very, very clear.
[06:25.920 --> 06:32.920]  You always have had the right to resist an unlawful arrest that was done without a warrant,
[06:32.920 --> 06:40.920]  or if it's done with an invalid warrant, anytime.
[06:40.920 --> 06:47.920]  The only time they can actually arrest you without a warrant is if there is a felony
[06:47.920 --> 06:53.920]  or a breach of the peace committed in the officer's presence or view.
[06:53.920 --> 07:00.920]  Now, in relation to a felony, the only exception to that is, is that the perpetrator of the
[07:00.920 --> 07:06.920]  felony is about to evade or escape justice.
[07:06.920 --> 07:13.920]  Then the officer is apprehended in, or is authorized to apprehend even without a warrant,
[07:13.920 --> 07:18.920]  and even if the offense was not committed in their presence and all they've had was
[07:18.920 --> 07:21.920]  the offense reported to them by a third party.
[07:21.920 --> 07:27.920]  That's the only exception to the felony rule in Texas case law.
[07:27.920 --> 07:30.920]  So what happened?
[07:30.920 --> 07:34.920]  How did we go from the right to resist an unlawful arrest that does not constitute a
[07:34.920 --> 07:46.920]  breach of the peace or a felony into being able to be arrested for virtually anything?
[07:46.920 --> 07:52.920]  Now, a couple of cases that I want to read to you tonight, or some parts of, there's
[07:52.920 --> 07:57.920]  a very famous case called the case of John Badelk.
[07:57.920 --> 08:01.920]  And this actually happened in South Dakota.
[08:01.920 --> 08:11.920]  But the court that tried and convicted him actually gave the jury the instruction that
[08:11.920 --> 08:15.920]  the officer that attempted to arrest him, there were three officers attempting to arrest
[08:15.920 --> 08:22.920]  him, none of them had a warrant, they were all doing it on verbal order, and there was
[08:22.920 --> 08:27.920]  no crime that was actually being perpetrated by Badelk that would have authorized such
[08:27.920 --> 08:29.920]  an order.
[08:29.920 --> 08:35.920]  Plus Badelk himself was also a peace officer.
[08:35.920 --> 08:39.920]  And three other peace officers were ordered to arrest him.
[08:39.920 --> 08:46.920]  Well, he resisted the arrest to the point of killing one of the three arresting officers.
[08:46.920 --> 08:50.920]  They tried and convicted Badelk of murder.
[08:50.920 --> 09:00.920]  And the high court, which is the Circuit Court of the United States of South Dakota, that's
[09:00.920 --> 09:02.920]  the one that convicted him, okay?
[09:02.920 --> 09:10.920]  And then when it went up, it was overturned because the high court said that, you know,
[09:10.920 --> 09:11.920]  that can't happen.
[09:11.920 --> 09:17.920]  An unlawful arrest has every right by the person being arrested to be resisted.
[09:17.920 --> 09:25.920]  In fact, third parties that intervene to prevent the unlawful arrest also have committed no
[09:25.920 --> 09:29.920]  crime of any kind.
[09:29.920 --> 09:39.920]  So how did we get from that mindset to anything and everything being reasonable to arrest
[09:39.920 --> 09:41.920]  even when there is not a warrant?
[09:41.920 --> 09:47.920]  And even when there is no complaining party of an actual injury or crime, except for the
[09:47.920 --> 09:52.920]  state itself, which can't really prove an injury because it can't stand up in court
[09:52.920 --> 09:56.920]  and show it?
[09:56.920 --> 09:59.920]  How did we get there?
[09:59.920 --> 10:07.920]  Well, this, of course, is the slow erosion of the power of the people being washed from
[10:07.920 --> 10:15.920]  the left bank and redeposited on the right bank, known as government.
[10:15.920 --> 10:23.920]  The courts have over time leached away at our side of the river and everything that
[10:23.920 --> 10:30.920]  it held and redeposited as far as powers and duties and rights over on the side of government,
[10:30.920 --> 10:38.920]  basically attempting to leave us without any affirmative support of any kind to uphold
[10:38.920 --> 10:42.920]  our own rights in the face of government.
[10:42.920 --> 10:47.920]  Now, the case of Bad Elk is just one of many.
[10:47.920 --> 10:53.920]  For instance, there was another case in Old England, believe it or not.
[10:53.920 --> 10:58.920]  And this was the Queen versus Tooley.
[10:58.920 --> 11:00.920]  And this is how this went.
[11:00.920 --> 11:03.920]  Read a little bit of excerpt out of it.
[11:03.920 --> 11:07.920]  Anne Deckens was a loudmouth party girl, or at least that's what the arrest warrant
[11:07.920 --> 11:08.920]  suggested.
[11:08.920 --> 11:12.920]  Whatever she may have done in the past, Ms. Deckens was quietly minding her own business
[11:12.920 --> 11:17.920]  when Officer Samuel Bray found her on the street and began to haul her away.
[11:17.920 --> 11:21.920]  Deckens wasn't inclined to go quietly and she put up a struggle.
[11:21.920 --> 11:26.920]  Her cries for help attracted the interest of several armed men led by an individual
[11:26.920 --> 11:31.920]  named Tooley who confronted Bray and abandoned to know what he was doing to the frantic woman.
[11:31.920 --> 11:35.920]  The officer produced his official credentials and insisted he was making a lawful arrest
[11:35.920 --> 11:37.920]  for disorderly conduct.
[11:37.920 --> 11:41.920]  When witnesses disputed that description, Bray called for backup.
[11:41.920 --> 11:46.920]  Tooley and his associates ordered Bray to release the woman and then took action to enforce
[11:46.920 --> 11:47.920]  that lawful order.
[11:47.920 --> 11:52.920]  After Bray's partner was killed in the ensuing struggle, Tooley and his associates were arrested
[11:52.920 --> 11:53.920]  for murder.
[11:53.920 --> 11:57.920]  The trial court threw out the murder charge, ruling that the warrant was defective.
[11:57.920 --> 12:02.920]  Since the arrest was illegal, the court pointed out, Deckens had a right to resist and bystanders
[12:02.920 --> 12:06.920]  likewise had a right, if not a positive duty, to assist her.
[12:06.920 --> 12:11.920]  The defendants were eventually found guilty of manslaughter but quickly pardoned and set
[12:11.920 --> 12:12.920]  free.
[12:12.920 --> 12:19.920]  By trying to enforce an invalid warrant, Bray did not act as a constable but a common oppressor,
[12:19.920 --> 12:21.920]  observed the trial court.
[12:21.920 --> 12:26.920]  Tooley and the other bystanders were properly provoked by the act of aggressive violence
[12:26.920 --> 12:31.920]  against Ann Deckens and their forceful but measured response, first demanding that the
[12:31.920 --> 12:39.920]  abductor release the hostage and then exercising defensive force to free her was entirely appropriate.
[12:39.920 --> 12:44.920]  Lawless violence against the helpless is a sufficient provocation to all people out of
[12:44.920 --> 12:49.920]  compassion in any circumstances, observed the court.
[12:49.920 --> 12:54.920]  Much more where it is done under a color of justice and where the liberty of the subject
[12:54.920 --> 12:55.920]  is invaded.
[12:55.920 --> 13:01.920]  In fact, an act of that kind carried out by a law enforcement official is nothing less
[13:01.920 --> 13:06.920]  than a provocation to all the subjects of England.
[13:06.920 --> 13:11.920]  Now, that's a pretty old case.
[13:11.920 --> 13:13.920]  That's an 1800s case.
[13:13.920 --> 13:22.920]  Even then in England, they were admitting that government can't do what it wants.
[13:22.920 --> 13:26.920]  So let's roll the clock forward to modern day America.
[13:26.920 --> 13:34.920]  You have events like what happened with a friend of mine when she got arrested by a
[13:34.920 --> 13:40.920]  DPS officer under an accusation of DUI when he conducted absolutely no test of any kind
[13:40.920 --> 13:46.920]  or had any evidence that she was under the influence of anything.
[13:46.920 --> 13:48.920]  He just arrested her.
[13:48.920 --> 13:54.920]  You have my other friend Ray, he wound up getting hauled to jail for doing nothing more
[13:54.920 --> 14:00.920]  than refusing to talk to an officer who had no right to force him to talk to him.
[14:00.920 --> 14:04.920]  The cop demanded he provide ID when there was nothing that Ray was doing wrong in order
[14:04.920 --> 14:07.920]  for that ID to be demanded.
[14:07.920 --> 14:12.920]  So as is typical and oppressive by these officers these days, they fabricate a false charge
[14:12.920 --> 14:23.920]  of failure to ID knowing full well that the necessary elements of the charge don't exist.
[14:23.920 --> 14:29.920]  And yet the only people seeing punishment for these false arrests and accusations are
[14:29.920 --> 14:31.920]  the ones being hauled in.
[14:31.920 --> 14:33.920]  You've got Antonio Bueller.
[14:33.920 --> 14:39.920]  All he did was photograph these officers acting in a manner that in this case history here
[14:39.920 --> 14:45.920]  would have gotten at least one of them killed justifiably.
[14:45.920 --> 14:49.920]  If all the bystanders that were witnessing this had taken matters into their own hands
[14:49.920 --> 14:53.920]  and killed the officer, there wouldn't have been any repercussion to them because they
[14:53.920 --> 15:01.920]  were doing the right thing in helping those ladies resist the abuse of that officer.
[15:01.920 --> 15:05.920]  Then of course you have goings on down in San Antonio.
[15:05.920 --> 15:09.920]  A young lady by the name of Ruby has been arrested several times for failure to ID when
[15:09.920 --> 15:16.920]  she has been in no position whatsoever that either required her to ID or the only real
[15:16.920 --> 15:21.920]  charge was she didn't give them a physical form of ID even though she provided them with
[15:21.920 --> 15:24.920]  the information.
[15:24.920 --> 15:29.920]  And if you go read the statutes on failure to ID, 3802 Penal Code, you will see very
[15:29.920 --> 15:35.920]  clearly there is nothing there that requires production of a physical form of ID.
[15:35.920 --> 15:43.920]  Nor can there be because there is no law and there cannot be a law that requires for any
[15:43.920 --> 15:50.920]  individual to go down and apply for a state or government issued form of ID.
[15:50.920 --> 15:53.920]  You can't be forced to obtain one.
[15:53.920 --> 16:02.920]  So how can you be charged with a crime for not producing one?
[16:02.920 --> 16:09.920]  And yet we sit by day in and day out and act like the person being arrested must have
[16:09.920 --> 16:13.920]  done something wrong for the cops to even try to arrest them.
[16:13.920 --> 16:21.920]  And folks, if you've been awake for very long at all or even out in public, you know
[16:21.920 --> 16:24.920]  that's not true.
[16:24.920 --> 16:31.920]  You don't have to do anything wrong for these cops today to go as far as murdering you
[16:31.920 --> 16:41.920]  and using the excuse of fearing for their life to end yours or someone you know.
[16:41.920 --> 16:43.920]  Antonio is right in one thing.
[16:43.920 --> 16:46.920]  That's the most cowardly form of doing your duty.
[16:46.920 --> 16:50.920]  I killed everybody else to save myself.
[16:50.920 --> 16:52.920]  All right, folks, we'll be right back on the other side.
[16:52.920 --> 16:53.920]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[16:53.920 --> 16:54.920]  Y'all hang on.
[16:54.920 --> 16:59.920]  We'll be right back after the break.
[16:59.920 --> 17:04.920]  Through advances in technology, our lives have greatly improved, except in the area
[17:04.920 --> 17:05.920]  of nutrition.
[17:05.920 --> 17:08.920]  People feed their pets better than they feed themselves.
[17:08.920 --> 17:10.920]  And it's time we changed all that.
[17:10.920 --> 17:16.920]  Our primary defense against aging and disease in this toxic environment is good nutrition.
[17:16.920 --> 17:22.920]  In a world where natural foods have been irradiated, adulterated, and mutilated, young Jevity can
[17:22.920 --> 17:24.920]  provide the nutrients you need.
[17:24.920 --> 17:29.920]  Logos Radio Network gets many requests to endorse all sorts of products, most of which
[17:29.920 --> 17:30.920]  we reject.
[17:30.920 --> 17:36.920]  We have come to trust young Jevity so much, we became a marketing distributor along with
[17:36.920 --> 17:38.920]  Alex Jones, Ben Fuchs, and many others.
[17:38.920 --> 17:45.920]  When you order from logosradionetwork.com, your health will improve as you help support
[17:45.920 --> 17:46.920]  quality radio.
[17:46.920 --> 17:51.920]  As you realize the benefits of young Jevity, you may want to join us.
[17:51.920 --> 17:56.920]  As a distributor, you can experience improved health, help your friends and family, and
[17:56.920 --> 17:58.920]  increase your income.
[17:58.920 --> 17:59.920]  Order now.
[17:59.920 --> 18:04.920]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[18:04.920 --> 18:08.920]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:08.920 --> 18:13.920]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you
[18:13.920 --> 18:14.920]  can win too.
[18:14.920 --> 18:18.920]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal
[18:18.920 --> 18:24.920]  civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phones, mail, or court summons, how to
[18:24.920 --> 18:28.920]  answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit report,
[18:28.920 --> 18:33.920]  how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[18:33.920 --> 18:38.920]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[18:38.920 --> 18:40.920]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[18:40.920 --> 18:46.920]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner,
[18:46.920 --> 18:49.920]  or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[18:49.920 --> 18:59.920]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[18:59.920 --> 19:00.920]  next.
[19:00.920 --> 19:10.920]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, the LogosRadioNetwork.com.
[19:30.920 --> 19:45.920]  All right, folks, we are back.
[19:45.920 --> 19:46.920]  Okay.
[19:46.920 --> 19:52.920]  Now, I want to read you something out of the Texas Penal Code, okay?
[19:52.920 --> 19:53.920]  Protection of Persons.
[19:53.920 --> 19:56.920]  They have a section here, Section 9.31, Self-Defense.
[19:56.920 --> 20:03.920]  Now, I want to read this to you because this is the legislature essentially telling you
[20:03.920 --> 20:10.920]  that despite all of the case law and all of your protected rights, they're going to tell you,
[20:10.920 --> 20:12.920]  you don't have any.
[20:12.920 --> 20:15.920]  And let me show you how they did that.
[20:15.920 --> 20:23.920]  Self-defense, Subsection A, except as provided in Subsection B, a person is justified in using
[20:23.920 --> 20:30.920]  force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is
[20:30.920 --> 20:35.920]  immediately necessary to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of
[20:35.920 --> 20:37.920]  unlawful force.
[20:37.920 --> 20:42.920]  The actor's belief that the force was immediately necessary as described by this subsection
[20:42.920 --> 20:49.920]  is presumed to be reasonable if the actor, one, knew or had reason to believe that the
[20:49.920 --> 20:55.920]  person against whom the force was used was A, unlawfully and with force entered or was
[20:55.920 --> 21:01.920]  attempting to enter unlawfully and with force the actor's occupied habitation vehicle or
[21:01.920 --> 21:08.920]  place of business or employment, B, unlawfully and with force removed or was attempting to
[21:08.920 --> 21:13.920]  remove unlawfully with force the actor from the actor's habitation vehicle or place of
[21:13.920 --> 21:20.920]  business or employment or C, was committing or attempting to commit aggravated kidnapping,
[21:20.920 --> 21:25.920]  murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery or aggravated robbery.
[21:25.920 --> 21:32.920]  Two, did not provoke the person against whom the force was used and three, was not otherwise
[21:32.920 --> 21:36.920]  engaged in criminal activity other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of
[21:36.920 --> 21:42.920]  law or ordinance regulating traffic at the time the force was used.
[21:42.920 --> 21:52.920]  Now this is B, the use of force against another is not justified, one, in response to verbal
[21:52.920 --> 22:02.920]  provocation alone, tell that to the cops by the way, two, to resist an arrest or search
[22:02.920 --> 22:09.920]  that the actor knows is being made by a peace officer or by a person acting in a peace officer's
[22:09.920 --> 22:21.920]  presence and at his direction even though the arrest or search is unlawful unless the
[22:21.920 --> 22:26.920]  resistance is justified under subsection C.
[22:26.920 --> 22:35.920]  Well, let's read the rest of this, three, if the actor consented to the exact force
[22:35.920 --> 22:41.920]  used or attempted by the other, if the actor provoked the other's use or attempted use
[22:41.920 --> 22:48.920]  of unlawful force unless A, the actor abandons the encounter or clearly communicates to the
[22:48.920 --> 22:53.920]  other his intent to do so reasonably believing that he cannot safely abandon the encounter
[22:53.920 --> 22:59.920]  and B, the other nevertheless continues or attempts to use unlawful force against the
[22:59.920 --> 23:05.920]  actor or five, if the actor sought an explanation from or discussion with the other person
[23:05.920 --> 23:10.920]  concerning the actor's differences with the other person while the actor was A, carrying
[23:10.920 --> 23:16.920]  a weapon in violation of section 4602 or B, possessing or transporting a weapon in violation
[23:16.920 --> 23:19.920]  of section 46.05.
[23:19.920 --> 23:26.920]  C, the use of force to resist an arrest or search is justified and this is the only two
[23:26.920 --> 23:29.920]  reasons they say you can resist arrest.
[23:29.920 --> 23:38.920]  If, or one, if before the actor offers any resistance, the peace officer or person acting
[23:38.920 --> 23:45.920]  at his direction uses or attempts to use greater force than necessary to make the arrest or
[23:45.920 --> 23:52.920]  search and when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately
[23:52.920 --> 23:57.920]  necessary to protect himself against the peace officer or other person's use or attempted
[23:57.920 --> 24:02.920]  use of greater force than necessary.
[24:02.920 --> 24:09.920]  Now, notice that the legislature has specifically tried to state that you cannot resist an unlawful
[24:09.920 --> 24:19.920]  arrest or search under any circumstances unless the use of force is greater than is necessary.
[24:19.920 --> 24:23.920]  Well, who gets to determine what is greater than necessary?
[24:23.920 --> 24:28.920]  An officer pulls his gun and points it at you or his taser for that matter and tells
[24:28.920 --> 24:30.920]  you, get out of the car, you're going to get searched.
[24:30.920 --> 24:36.920]  Get out of the car, you're going to get arrested even though technically there's nothing to
[24:36.920 --> 24:38.920]  arrest you for.
[24:38.920 --> 24:42.920]  Or he points his gun at you, gets you out of the car and puts you in cuffs and tells
[24:42.920 --> 24:48.920]  you you're being detained for your own safety, which by the way is completely illegal.
[24:48.920 --> 24:54.920]  They can't just put cuffs on you and claim it's for your safety so they're going to detain
[24:54.920 --> 24:56.920]  you physically restrained.
[24:56.920 --> 24:57.920]  Can't do it.
[24:57.920 --> 25:00.920]  The moment they attempt to use those cuffs, it's an arrest.
[25:00.920 --> 25:09.920]  The moment it's an arrest and he has no probable cause, the arrest is not authorized.
[25:09.920 --> 25:14.920]  If it's not authorized, you have the right to resist it.
[25:14.920 --> 25:17.920]  They can't write a statute that takes that away from you.
[25:17.920 --> 25:19.920]  Yet here it is.
[25:19.920 --> 25:22.920]  Guess whose side the court took.
[25:22.920 --> 25:26.920]  Big surprise.
[25:26.920 --> 25:33.920]  The court has started to say that any time that the legislature passes a statute, and
[25:33.920 --> 25:40.920]  to use Randy's words, and they want to declare it a special statute that circumvents all
[25:40.920 --> 25:50.920]  protections of the Bill of Rights, then it's an acceptable interference or taking away
[25:50.920 --> 25:51.920]  of that right.
[25:51.920 --> 25:57.920]  Just because the legislature passed a statute saying it was okay.
[25:57.920 --> 26:05.920]  Well, if your right can be legislated away, it's not a right.
[26:05.920 --> 26:14.920]  How can this statute stand under the provisions of the Texas Bill of Rights?
[26:14.920 --> 26:22.920]  If no arrest can occur without probable cause and a statement to obtain a proper warrant,
[26:22.920 --> 26:29.920]  then by default, an arrest without a warrant is unreasonable.
[26:29.920 --> 26:32.920]  And that's something else the Texas courts always ruled on.
[26:32.920 --> 26:37.920]  By default, an arrest without warrant is unreasonable.
[26:37.920 --> 26:43.920]  Therefore, part of the purpose of having an examining trial was to determine two probable
[26:43.920 --> 26:46.920]  cause items.
[26:46.920 --> 26:50.920]  Was the arrest itself lawful?
[26:50.920 --> 26:57.920]  Because if the arrest wasn't lawful, nothing else that follows is lawful.
[26:57.920 --> 27:01.920]  No search, no seizure, no crime.
[27:01.920 --> 27:10.920]  That's the way the case law always read.
[27:10.920 --> 27:12.920]  So then what?
[27:12.920 --> 27:16.920]  How did it go from over there to all the way over here?
[27:16.920 --> 27:22.920]  For now, you can't resist unless, basically, the officer attempted to murder you for no
[27:22.920 --> 27:30.920]  good reason, or is attempting to physically injure you to such a degree as to be permanent
[27:30.920 --> 27:34.920]  or so harmful as to take a lot of recovery time.
[27:34.920 --> 27:40.920]  But again, who is the ultimate arbiter as to how much force is reasonable?
[27:40.920 --> 27:47.920]  The moment you resist, even if you're resisting being shot to death, you're guilty of aggravated
[27:47.920 --> 27:51.920]  assault on a police officer, according to them.
[27:51.920 --> 27:56.920]  They accuse you of things even that you haven't done.
[27:56.920 --> 28:04.920]  That video recordings constantly prove the officer lied through their teeth to justify
[28:04.920 --> 28:07.920]  their actions.
[28:07.920 --> 28:15.920]  Of intentionally flicking harm or outright murdering one of us.
[28:15.920 --> 28:21.920]  If they want an us-is-them situation, well, here it is.
[28:21.920 --> 28:34.920]  How does our government actors grant themselves the power to murder us without any justification
[28:34.920 --> 28:38.920]  or repercussion?
[28:38.920 --> 28:44.920]  Because believe me, they've granted this power to themselves via the courts and via this
[28:44.920 --> 28:52.920]  type of legislation to give the court some semblance of justification for the way that
[28:52.920 --> 28:54.920]  it rules.
[28:54.920 --> 28:59.920]  Now, Texas has gotten extremely oppressive in the way it does things.
[28:59.920 --> 29:06.920]  We know this because 99.6% conviction rate.
[29:06.920 --> 29:11.920]  And you and I both know that if you've been to my class or listened to this show, that
[29:11.920 --> 29:16.920]  90% of the stuff they're supposed to do, they never do.
[29:16.920 --> 29:21.920]  They deprive you of due process from the very beginning, and they continue that through
[29:21.920 --> 29:25.920]  to the very end.
[29:25.920 --> 29:34.920]  So if they're doing that to protect their own power, and we're doing nothing, why are
[29:34.920 --> 29:38.920]  we surprised by where we find ourselves?
[29:38.920 --> 29:43.920]  On the really crappy end of the stick that's beating us.
[29:43.920 --> 29:49.920]  Doesn't really come as a surprise to me, but I will tell you, I am getting really, really
[29:49.920 --> 29:51.920]  tired of it.
[29:51.920 --> 29:55.920]  All right, folks, call at number 512-646-1984.
[29:55.920 --> 29:56.920]  Give us a call.
[29:56.920 --> 30:01.920]  We'll be right back.
[30:01.920 --> 30:02.920]  Ug.
[30:02.920 --> 30:05.920]  Folks hate Monday because it means the start of another work week.
[30:05.920 --> 30:10.920]  But there's one activity you can start on Monday that's likely to be a smashing success.
[30:10.920 --> 30:14.920]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back to tell you what it is.
[30:14.920 --> 30:16.920]  Privacy is under attack.
[30:16.920 --> 30:20.920]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[30:20.920 --> 30:25.920]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish, too.
[30:25.920 --> 30:26.920]  So protect your rights.
[30:26.920 --> 30:30.920]  Say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[30:30.920 --> 30:32.920]  Privacy, it's worth hanging onto.
[30:32.920 --> 30:37.920]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, the private search
[30:37.920 --> 30:40.920]  engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[30:40.920 --> 30:44.920]  Start over with StartPage.
[30:44.920 --> 30:49.920]  Monday's diet is full of grace, but Tuesday's diet could be a disgrace.
[30:49.920 --> 30:53.920]  A study in Britain shows that people who started dieting on a Tuesday were the most likely
[30:53.920 --> 30:58.920]  to lose their resolve within a week and end up heavier than when they started.
[30:58.920 --> 31:00.920]  Friday was another bad weight loss day.
[31:00.920 --> 31:05.920]  More than half of the 2,000 people surveyed ditched their diets on Friday after a stressful
[31:05.920 --> 31:06.920]  week at work.
[31:06.920 --> 31:08.920]  What were the good dieting days?
[31:08.920 --> 31:12.920]  People who started their diets on Sunday and Monday were far more likely to shed the most
[31:12.920 --> 31:14.920]  weight and keep the weight off.
[31:14.920 --> 31:17.920]  So maybe Fleetwood Mac had it right when they sang,
[31:17.920 --> 31:20.920]  Monday morning you sure looked fine.
[31:20.920 --> 31:21.920]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[31:21.920 --> 31:30.920]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[31:30.920 --> 31:35.920]  This is Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper that fell on the afternoon of September 11.
[31:35.920 --> 31:37.920]  The government says that fire brought it down.
[31:37.920 --> 31:42.920]  However, 1,500 architects and engineers concluded it was a controlled demolition.
[31:42.920 --> 31:45.920]  Over 6,000 of my fellow service members have given their lives.
[31:45.920 --> 31:48.920]  Thousands of my fellow first responders are dying.
[31:48.920 --> 31:49.920]  I'm not a conspiracy theorist.
[31:49.920 --> 31:50.920]  I'm a structural engineer.
[31:50.920 --> 31:51.920]  I'm a New York City correction officer.
[31:51.920 --> 31:52.920]  I'm an Air Force pilot.
[31:52.920 --> 31:54.920]  I'm a father who lost his son.
[31:54.920 --> 31:57.920]  We're Americans, and we deserve the truth.
[31:57.920 --> 32:01.920]  Go to RememberBuilding7.org today.
[32:01.920 --> 32:04.920]  Rule of Law Radio is proud to offer the Rule of Law traffic seminar.
[32:04.920 --> 32:07.920]  In today's America, we live in an us-against-them society.
[32:07.920 --> 32:09.920]  And if we, the people, are ever going to have a free society,
[32:09.920 --> 32:12.920]  then we're going to have to stand and defend our own rights.
[32:12.920 --> 32:14.920]  Among those rights are the right to travel freely from place to place,
[32:14.920 --> 32:16.920]  the right to act in our own private capacity,
[32:16.920 --> 32:19.920]  and most importantly, the right to due process of law.
[32:19.920 --> 32:22.920]  Traffic courts afford us the least expensive opportunity to learn
[32:22.920 --> 32:25.920]  how to enforce and preserve our rights through due process.
[32:25.920 --> 32:28.920]  Former Sheriff's Deputy Eddie Craig, in conjunction with Rule of Law Radio,
[32:28.920 --> 32:31.920]  has put together the most comprehensive teaching tool available
[32:31.920 --> 32:33.920]  that will help you understand what due process is
[32:33.920 --> 32:35.920]  and how to hold courts to the rule of law.
[32:35.920 --> 32:37.920]  You can get your own copy of this invaluable material
[32:37.920 --> 32:40.920]  by going to ruleoflawradio.com and ordering your copy today.
[32:40.920 --> 32:42.920]  By ordering now, you'll receive a copy of Eddie's book,
[32:42.920 --> 32:45.920]  The Texas Transportation Code, The Law Versus the Lie,
[32:45.920 --> 32:47.920]  video and audio of the original 2009 seminar,
[32:47.920 --> 32:50.920]  hundreds of research documents, and other useful resource materials.
[32:50.920 --> 32:52.920]  Learn how to fight for your rights with the help of this material
[32:52.920 --> 32:54.920]  from ruleoflawradio.com.
[32:54.920 --> 32:57.920]  Order your copy today, and together we can have the free society
[32:57.920 --> 32:59.920]  we all want and deserve.
[33:02.920 --> 33:06.920]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com.
[33:06.920 --> 33:10.920]  Live, free speech radio, logosradionetwork.com
[33:36.920 --> 33:40.920]  This is a race for a duty
[33:40.920 --> 33:44.920]  Well, I need a prosecutor to come and help me
[33:44.920 --> 33:48.920]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[33:48.920 --> 33:50.920]  All right.
[33:50.920 --> 33:54.920]  My friend Johnny, he put up a whole bunch of case law over here
[33:54.920 --> 33:57.920]  on the subject matter of unlawful arrest,
[33:57.920 --> 34:02.920]  and it's gone all the way from virtually every state court
[34:02.920 --> 34:04.920]  to the United States Supreme Court.
[34:04.920 --> 34:06.920]  It's said over and over again,
[34:06.920 --> 34:10.920]  we all have a common law right to resist arrest.
[34:10.920 --> 34:15.920]  Now, what the legislature has tried to do in certain cases
[34:15.920 --> 34:19.920]  is authorize an arrest without a warrant
[34:19.920 --> 34:22.920]  for particular types of offenses,
[34:22.920 --> 34:25.920]  even when that offense does not constitute a felony
[34:25.920 --> 34:28.920]  or a breach of the peace.
[34:28.920 --> 34:33.920]  So, now we have to wonder how did that become proper?
[34:33.920 --> 34:36.920]  How does the legislature authorize something
[34:36.920 --> 34:43.920]  that clearly violates prohibitions of due process
[34:43.920 --> 34:46.920]  and protected rights?
[34:46.920 --> 34:50.920]  First off, let's deal with the issue of these 99% of the time
[34:50.920 --> 34:55.920]  are totally victimless acts.
[34:55.920 --> 34:58.920]  I don't want to call them crimes because
[34:58.920 --> 35:01.920]  even though they're trying to call them a crime
[35:01.920 --> 35:03.920]  as a crime, how can there be a crime
[35:03.920 --> 35:05.920]  without a corpus delecti?
[35:05.920 --> 35:08.920]  Because the corpus delecti is what gives the state standing
[35:08.920 --> 35:11.920]  to move against you in a punitive fashion.
[35:11.920 --> 35:15.920]  The state claiming an injury and the state being able
[35:15.920 --> 35:21.920]  to demonstrate one are clearly two very different things.
[35:21.920 --> 35:23.920]  I can claim to have a broken leg,
[35:23.920 --> 35:28.920]  but till you produce an x-ray that shows that my leg is broken,
[35:28.920 --> 35:34.920]  that's all it is, is a claim.
[35:34.920 --> 35:37.920]  I can't prove my leg is broken.
[35:37.920 --> 35:42.920]  Therefore, I can't prove you ever inflicted that injury.
[35:42.920 --> 35:46.920]  So, how does the state get away with doing it without a victim
[35:46.920 --> 35:51.920]  in the case of these Class C fine-only tickets?
[35:51.920 --> 35:56.920]  Well, again, how they get you is by agreement.
[35:56.920 --> 36:01.920]  But whether or not that agreement can be criminalized,
[36:01.920 --> 36:04.920]  I don't see that.
[36:04.920 --> 36:07.920]  Like I said a couple of shows ago,
[36:07.920 --> 36:12.920]  I can't think of any way a criminal act can be done by paper
[36:12.920 --> 36:19.920]  in the form of a contract except for fraud.
[36:19.920 --> 36:23.920]  You can't commit murder by writing it down on a piece of paper
[36:23.920 --> 36:27.920]  unless it's instructions to the assassin to do it and who the target is.
[36:27.920 --> 36:33.920]  But the act itself is still what's punishable as the crime, the actual murder.
[36:33.920 --> 36:37.920]  All that note did was make you an accomplice to it
[36:37.920 --> 36:42.920]  or the instigator of the act.
[36:42.920 --> 36:46.920]  But just writing it down doesn't do it.
[36:46.920 --> 36:50.920]  Any more than the state claiming that because you went more than
[36:50.920 --> 36:58.920]  five miles over the speed limit, they posted that you caused the state a harm
[36:58.920 --> 37:03.920]  and they have no evidence or proof that they suffered any injury whatsoever
[37:03.920 --> 37:06.920]  to constitute a proper harm.
[37:06.920 --> 37:11.920]  None.
[37:11.920 --> 37:16.920]  That's the same thing these big corporations do when they claim a loss for something,
[37:16.920 --> 37:22.920]  they can't prove they ever suffered the loss.
[37:22.920 --> 37:26.920]  They make a general allegation of we lost this, this, and this,
[37:26.920 --> 37:28.920]  but then they can't prove it.
[37:28.920 --> 37:33.920]  They just say that because it happened, we suffered.
[37:33.920 --> 37:35.920]  And they're not required to prove that they suffered
[37:35.920 --> 37:42.920]  and that the person they're accusing was actually the one that caused it.
[37:42.920 --> 37:46.920]  That's where all these copyright suits come from.
[37:46.920 --> 37:51.920]  So it really doesn't matter what act you're engaged in these days,
[37:51.920 --> 37:58.920]  the legislators in every state have attempted to give the power of arrest to a cop
[37:58.920 --> 38:01.920]  for even the most menial thing.
[38:01.920 --> 38:08.920]  Thus, giving the cop a free hand to act under color of law
[38:08.920 --> 38:16.920]  to deprive you of the very thing that we told our government you can never deprive us of.
[38:16.920 --> 38:22.920]  One of our protected rights is you cannot arrest me without a warrant
[38:22.920 --> 38:28.920]  that's been accompanied by a statement of probable cause to issue that warrant.
[38:28.920 --> 38:39.920]  And the courts carved out a very, very small notch as an exception to that rule of the Bill of Rights.
[38:39.920 --> 38:45.920]  And that notch was limited to felonies or breaches of the peace
[38:45.920 --> 38:49.920]  committed in the presence or view of the arresting individual.
[38:49.920 --> 38:53.920]  With the only other exception at that stage being
[38:53.920 --> 39:01.920]  the perpetrator of a felony was about to evade and escape justice.
[39:01.920 --> 39:06.920]  In Vernon's, I read several cases all dealing with pretty much these very things,
[39:06.920 --> 39:09.920]  robberies and bank robberies.
[39:09.920 --> 39:13.920]  There were several cases dealing with liquor store holdups,
[39:13.920 --> 39:18.920]  sidewalk muggings, and a couple of bank robberies.
[39:18.920 --> 39:24.920]  And in each case, the court had to overturn a criminal conviction
[39:24.920 --> 39:33.920]  for the crime against the accused because the officer arrested them without a valid warrant.
[39:33.920 --> 39:38.920]  And he arrested them at a time and place when no crime was being committed
[39:38.920 --> 39:41.920]  in the officer's presence or view.
[39:41.920 --> 39:53.920]  Nor were the perpetrators attempting to evade or escape justice, allowing for that other exception to the felony arrest.
[39:53.920 --> 40:00.920]  In every one of these cases, the Texas courts ruled a warrant had to be obtained.
[40:00.920 --> 40:08.920]  One of these so-called bank robbers that allegedly had participated in a bank robbery earlier the same day
[40:08.920 --> 40:15.920]  was in his living room watching television and a cop saw him through the window of his house,
[40:15.920 --> 40:19.920]  knew he was suspected of participating in the bank robbery.
[40:19.920 --> 40:27.920]  The cop broke down the door, ran inside, apprehended the guy, and arrested him.
[40:27.920 --> 40:33.920]  The court threw out the case because they said the officer had to get a warrant.
[40:33.920 --> 40:37.920]  He could not break into the man's home even though he saw him sitting right there.
[40:37.920 --> 40:46.920]  He could not break into his home and arrest him without a valid warrant because he was not attempting to evade or escape.
[40:46.920 --> 40:49.920]  That's the way it's supposed to be, folks.
[40:49.920 --> 40:53.920]  We're not supposed to have to worry about getting arrested every time we turn around.
[40:53.920 --> 41:00.920]  We're not supposed to have to worry about getting murdered by our public servants every time we turn around.
[41:00.920 --> 41:05.920]  You remember when you used to be proud to walk up and just say hi to a police officer?
[41:05.920 --> 41:09.920]  I can remember that.
[41:09.920 --> 41:10.920]  It was a pleasure.
[41:10.920 --> 41:17.920]  I mean, it was an honor to be able to tell somebody, yeah, I've got a relative who's a peace officer.
[41:17.920 --> 41:21.920]  Or my family knows several peace officers.
[41:21.920 --> 41:23.920]  They're friends of the family.
[41:23.920 --> 41:27.920]  That used to be something honorable to tell somebody.
[41:27.920 --> 41:32.920]  Now it's like telling somebody, yeah, I know a cop.
[41:32.920 --> 41:41.920]  It's the same thing as saying, yeah, my brother's in jail for murdering his whole family in their sleep, including his three four-year-old children.
[41:41.920 --> 41:49.920]  Telling somebody that you have a cop in the family, that's going to produce about the same results to the general public these days.
[41:49.920 --> 41:50.920]  And I'll say it again.
[41:50.920 --> 41:52.920]  Every cop isn't bad.
[41:52.920 --> 41:54.920]  But you know what, cops?
[41:54.920 --> 41:59.920]  Every person you meet on the street that isn't a cop is bad either.
[41:59.920 --> 42:04.920]  They're not bad either.
[42:04.920 --> 42:06.920]  So this door has to swing both ways.
[42:06.920 --> 42:11.920]  You want us to respect you, you have to respect us, but you don't.
[42:11.920 --> 42:14.920]  You're power mad.
[42:14.920 --> 42:22.920]  You justify your bullying under the decree of doing your duty.
[42:22.920 --> 42:24.920]  Well, it's not a part of your duty.
[42:24.920 --> 42:26.920]  I don't care what your superiors tell you.
[42:26.920 --> 42:30.920]  I don't care what the legislature writes in the statutes.
[42:30.920 --> 42:39.920]  It is not your duty to violate the rights, persons, and property of any individual.
[42:39.920 --> 42:49.920]  Yes, you have a right to protect your own life, but you hired on to an already job, a knowingly dangerous job.
[42:49.920 --> 42:52.920]  You knew it was dangerous when you took it.
[42:52.920 --> 43:04.920]  Therefore, if the only way you have to react to what happens on your job is out of fear that causes you to do nothing but kill before you think, then you shouldn't be in that job.
[43:04.920 --> 43:05.920]  That's not discrimination.
[43:05.920 --> 43:09.920]  That's common fricking sense.
[43:09.920 --> 43:25.920]  If you're too afraid to face up to somebody who is dangerous, but who may be apprehended without murdering them, that's what you're required to do.
[43:25.920 --> 43:35.920]  You hired on to take those risks, not to put everyone else at risk.
[43:35.920 --> 43:39.920]  Too bad they don't have bravery tests for you idiots.
[43:39.920 --> 43:40.920]  All right, folks.
[43:40.920 --> 43:42.920]  Debbie, Doug, I see you there on the board.
[43:42.920 --> 43:43.920]  Y'all hang on.
[43:43.920 --> 43:44.920]  I'll start taking the calls on the other side.
[43:44.920 --> 43:48.920]  Call in number 512-646-1984.
[43:48.920 --> 43:51.920]  Give us a call, a holler, or a complaint.
[43:51.920 --> 43:52.920]  Either way works for me.
[43:52.920 --> 43:59.920]  I'll talk to y'all when we get right back.
[43:59.920 --> 44:02.920]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[44:02.920 --> 44:13.920]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand, 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[44:13.920 --> 44:17.920]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[44:17.920 --> 44:21.920]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[44:21.920 --> 44:26.920]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[44:26.920 --> 44:33.920]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[44:33.920 --> 44:42.920]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[44:42.920 --> 44:51.920]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[44:51.920 --> 45:03.920]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[45:03.920 --> 45:04.920]  Hello.
[45:04.920 --> 45:11.920]  My name is Stuart Smith from naturespureorganics.com, and I would like to invite you to come by our store at 1904 Guadalupe Street, Sweet D.
[45:11.920 --> 45:18.920]  here in Austin, Texas, buying Brave New Books and Chase Payne to see all our fantastic health and wellness products with your very own eyes.
[45:18.920 --> 45:22.920]  Have a look at our Miracle Healing Clay that started our adventure in alternative medicine.
[45:22.920 --> 45:30.920]  Take a peek at some of our other wonderful products, including our Australian Eme oil, lotion candles, olive oil, soaps, and colloidal silver and gold.
[45:30.920 --> 45:37.920]  Call 512-264-4043 or find us online at naturespureorganics.com.
[45:37.920 --> 45:43.920]  That's 512-264-4043, naturespureorganics.com.
[45:43.920 --> 45:47.920]  Don't forget to like us on Facebook for information on events and our products.
[45:47.920 --> 45:50.920]  Naturespureorganics.com.
[46:17.920 --> 46:31.920]  All right, folks, we are back.
[46:31.920 --> 46:38.920]  This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[46:38.920 --> 46:39.920]  All right.
[46:39.920 --> 46:41.920]  We are going to start with Debbie in Texas.
[46:41.920 --> 46:43.920]  Debbie, what can I do for you?
[46:43.920 --> 47:04.920]  Yes, I went before the grand jury under Article 20.09, and I'd like to know, can the foreman be the schedule at the same time being the deputy district attorney?
[47:04.920 --> 47:06.920]  Well, wait, wait, wait.
[47:06.920 --> 47:07.920]  Say that again.
[47:07.920 --> 47:16.920]  Okay, can the foreman of the grand jury be the scheduler and also be the deputy district attorney?
[47:16.920 --> 47:17.920]  Absolutely not.
[47:17.920 --> 47:21.920]  The deputy district attorney cannot sit on the grand jury.
[47:21.920 --> 47:23.920]  Well, that's what's happening.
[47:23.920 --> 47:24.920]  What can I do?
[47:24.920 --> 47:34.920]  Well, technically, that's a good question, but no, they absolutely cannot.
[47:34.920 --> 47:44.920]  I will be going back, but I don't want to, I only have one stab for the grand jury.
[47:44.920 --> 47:45.920]  What can I do?
[47:45.920 --> 47:57.920]  I would notify, not that I can tell you exactly how well it will work in one way or the other, but first thing is I've notified the attorney general's office
[47:57.920 --> 48:12.920]  and the United States attorney's office that a grand jury in your part of Texas has been hijacked by the district attorney's office to facilitate their takeover and conviction rate.
[48:12.920 --> 48:24.920]  Because no, there is absolutely no way one of the district attorneys can sit on the grand jury.
[48:24.920 --> 48:25.920]  Hello?
[48:25.920 --> 48:29.920]  Yes, I'm just, okay.
[48:29.920 --> 48:32.920]  Who at the attorney general's office?
[48:32.920 --> 48:33.920]  That's quite large.
[48:33.920 --> 48:36.920]  Just address it directly to Greg Abbott.
[48:36.920 --> 48:52.920]  Just let him know that there is a district attorney in your part of the state that has commandeered the foreman's position on the grand jury, and he absolutely cannot do that.
[48:52.920 --> 48:57.920]  He cannot sit on the grand jury, period.
[48:57.920 --> 49:05.920]  I'm going back next week, next Tuesday.
[49:05.920 --> 49:10.920]  Should I also go before the judge that put him there?
[49:10.920 --> 49:19.920]  Well, if the judge put him there, then the judge is every bit at fault as well, because the judge should know that can't happen.
[49:19.920 --> 49:27.920]  What judge was stupid enough to put a district attorney as a foreman of the grand jury?
[49:27.920 --> 49:35.920]  Well, Jim Bob Darnell, Judge Darnell.
[49:35.920 --> 49:37.920]  Jim Bob Darnell?
[49:37.920 --> 49:38.920]  Yes.
[49:38.920 --> 49:44.920]  He's in the 140th District Court.
[49:44.920 --> 49:46.920]  That 1L or 2?
[49:46.920 --> 49:49.920]  I think it's 1L.
[49:49.920 --> 49:50.920]  Lovett County?
[49:50.920 --> 49:51.920]  Yes.
[49:51.920 --> 49:52.920]  That's 2.
[49:52.920 --> 49:55.920]  Oh, 2.
[49:55.920 --> 49:57.920]  Okay.
[49:57.920 --> 50:03.920]  Yeah, he looks like an idiot.
[50:03.920 --> 50:08.920]  Yeah, definitely start with the attorney general's office and the United States Attorney's Office.
[50:08.920 --> 50:19.920]  Make the complaint that your grand jury has been hijacked by this particular district judge and the district attorney's office.
[50:19.920 --> 50:20.920]  Okay.
[50:20.920 --> 50:23.920]  But you're sure this DA has been assigned as foreman?
[50:23.920 --> 50:29.920]  I know for a fact, because I saw him with my own two eyes and spoke to him.
[50:29.920 --> 50:32.920]  And he said he was a district attorney?
[50:32.920 --> 50:36.920]  I know he's a deputy district attorney.
[50:36.920 --> 50:39.920]  He even gave me his card.
[50:39.920 --> 50:43.920]  And on his card says deputy district attorney.
[50:43.920 --> 50:48.920]  And how long have they been putting district attorneys in the grand jury there in Lovett County?
[50:48.920 --> 50:50.920]  I have no idea.
[50:50.920 --> 50:51.920]  I just found this out.
[50:51.920 --> 50:53.920]  I was in a state of shock.
[50:53.920 --> 50:55.920]  Well, with good cause.
[50:55.920 --> 50:59.920]  That should never be allowed to happen.
[50:59.920 --> 51:00.920]  Okay.
[51:00.920 --> 51:03.920]  Then I'll call the attorney general's office tomorrow.
[51:03.920 --> 51:04.920]  I don't recommend calling.
[51:04.920 --> 51:07.920]  I recommend doing it in writing.
[51:07.920 --> 51:13.920]  Make sure you do it in writing and CC and send it to both offices.
[51:13.920 --> 51:20.920]  Make sure that the attorney general's office copy shows a CC to the U.S. attorney,
[51:20.920 --> 51:25.920]  and make sure the U.S. attorney shows a CC to the state attorney general.
[51:25.920 --> 51:30.920]  Well, we've got a justice department, which is right across the street from the district.
[51:30.920 --> 51:33.920]  Federal Justice Department?
[51:33.920 --> 51:36.920]  Yes, the Federal Justice Department.
[51:36.920 --> 51:37.920]  Okay.
[51:37.920 --> 51:43.920]  Then your U.S. attorney should be there, but you still want to give that to them in writing.
[51:43.920 --> 51:44.920]  You do.
[51:44.920 --> 51:45.920]  Okay.
[51:45.920 --> 51:50.920]  And you want to make sure that you keep a copy that shows they were served with it.
[51:50.920 --> 51:52.920]  And if they do nothing, what do I do?
[51:52.920 --> 52:01.920]  Well, this goes back to what I was speaking of a few minutes ago about when do we get busy doing what needs to be done to solve these problems.
[52:01.920 --> 52:03.920]  See, that's the problem.
[52:03.920 --> 52:13.920]  When you're asking the system to fix itself, how far do you actually think you're going to get when the system is already corrupted beyond repair?
[52:13.920 --> 52:16.920]  That's kind of the problem.
[52:16.920 --> 52:23.920]  I realize that I won't be able to get an answer from my two letters to the U.S.
[52:23.920 --> 52:27.920]  Well, you may get an answer, but what that answer will be, I can't tell you.
[52:27.920 --> 52:31.920]  Well, I won't be able to get it by next Tuesday.
[52:31.920 --> 52:32.920]  What happens next Tuesday?
[52:32.920 --> 52:37.920]  I have to go before the grand jury again, and that person will be there.
[52:37.920 --> 52:39.920]  Then object to that person sitting.
[52:39.920 --> 52:42.920]  Challenge the construction or the panel of the grand jury.
[52:42.920 --> 52:44.920]  Object to it.
[52:44.920 --> 52:56.920]  Insist that the grand jury has been tainted by the presence of an assistant district attorney who cannot sit on a district or a grand jury.
[52:56.920 --> 53:00.920]  Challenge the formation of the grand jury.
[53:00.920 --> 53:02.920]  Okay.
[53:02.920 --> 53:06.920]  You have every right to do that.
[53:06.920 --> 53:07.920]  Okay.
[53:07.920 --> 53:12.920]  Now, do I just challenge it in the grand jury room or do I go to the judge?
[53:12.920 --> 53:14.920]  You can do both.
[53:14.920 --> 53:18.920]  And again, make sure that whatever you do, you do in writing.
[53:18.920 --> 53:19.920]  Okay.
[53:19.920 --> 53:20.920]  Okay.
[53:20.920 --> 53:21.920]  Okay.
[53:21.920 --> 53:22.920]  Super.
[53:22.920 --> 53:23.920]  Thank you so much.
[53:23.920 --> 53:24.920]  You're welcome.
[53:24.920 --> 53:25.920]  Bye-bye.
[53:25.920 --> 53:33.920]  So as you can tell, folks, by that bit of news and those questions, it is not getting any better.
[53:33.920 --> 53:36.920]  It is getting worse every single day.
[53:36.920 --> 53:45.920]  I cannot imagine a judge stupid enough to think that was allowed, but I do see his picture.
[53:45.920 --> 53:49.920]  So I guess I can't imagine him now.
[53:49.920 --> 53:52.920]  But this is what they're doing.
[53:52.920 --> 53:59.920]  They get their conviction rates by stacking the deck against us in every way possible, whether it be the statutes themselves,
[53:59.920 --> 54:09.920]  the misrepresentations made by those statutes, the refusal to abide by the procedural rules that protect our rights, you name it,
[54:09.920 --> 54:21.920]  they will go to every limit they can and push it way outside of bounds to win.
[54:21.920 --> 54:29.920]  And to get your money or get you out of the way or to shut you up or just any number of things.
[54:29.920 --> 54:33.920]  It really just depends on what it is they're hoping to get by coming after you in the first place.
[54:33.920 --> 54:36.920]  But usually it's going to be money.
[54:36.920 --> 54:37.920]  All right.
[54:37.920 --> 54:39.920]  Now we're going to go to Doug in Texas.
[54:39.920 --> 54:41.920]  Doug, what can we do for you?
[54:41.920 --> 54:52.920]  Eddie, you know, I'm normally anti-law enforcement official.
[54:52.920 --> 55:07.920]  I want to report to you that I've met a couple of real big guys in the last couple of weeks that were, you know, employed in law enforcement or whatever.
[55:07.920 --> 55:14.920]  I met a guy that when we had the big flood in South Austin,
[55:14.920 --> 55:20.920]  and they were stopping all the cars going through there and doing this and that and the other guy.
[55:20.920 --> 55:27.920]  He knocks on my passenger side, like rolled down your window, nandicate.
[55:27.920 --> 55:37.920]  And Tim, hey, I have seat belts on. I have my vitamin supplements and trucks loaded up on this side.
[55:37.920 --> 55:41.920]  Why don't you just come around here and talk to me?
[55:41.920 --> 55:50.920]  So he walks around in front of my truck and he comes up to me and he says, I love your stickers.
[55:50.920 --> 55:53.920]  I love your bumper stickers.
[55:53.920 --> 56:08.920]  You know, I got Infowars and I got, you know, a picture of Obama and Bush, same crap, different piles and this and that and the other.
[56:08.920 --> 56:12.920]  Back to my truck's loaded up with bumper stickers.
[56:12.920 --> 56:15.920]  He said, I love your bumper stickers.
[56:15.920 --> 56:20.920]  I said, well, a lot of people do. I get a lot of thumbs up.
[56:20.920 --> 56:25.920]  Okay, that's a good car.
[56:25.920 --> 56:31.920]  He walks back to the other side of the road and I proceed on.
[56:31.920 --> 56:35.920]  And then I got stopped coming home to Bastrop.
[56:35.920 --> 56:43.920]  The guy said, well, you're driving 45 and it's 65.
[56:43.920 --> 56:54.920]  And I said, it's like, you know, drive slow. I really don't like running over feral hogs or deer or whatever and it's dark.
[56:54.920 --> 56:57.920]  I'm not used to driving in the dark.
[56:57.920 --> 57:00.920]  He said, okay. I don't know.
[57:00.920 --> 57:09.920]  And he said, you know, I'll give you a little, write you a ticket. It has no consequences.
[57:09.920 --> 57:12.920]  It just, you know.
[57:12.920 --> 57:15.920]  Did I warned you against not breaking the law?
[57:15.920 --> 57:18.920]  No, nothing.
[57:18.920 --> 57:22.920]  No, that's what I'm saying. His little ticket of no consequence, a warning ticket.
[57:22.920 --> 57:26.920]  And what was he warning you of doing? Not breaking the law?
[57:26.920 --> 57:30.920]  No, I was driving 45 and it's 65, which.
[57:30.920 --> 57:33.920]  Yeah, but that's not against the law. That's my point.
[57:33.920 --> 57:40.920]  Fine. Fine.
[57:40.920 --> 57:45.920]  But he was extremely quiet and a nice guy.
[57:45.920 --> 57:49.920]  You know, I saw two guys in one day that were really.
[57:49.920 --> 57:53.920]  And, you know, I thought they were good.
[57:53.920 --> 57:58.920]  He said, I was afraid you might be drunk if you haven't.
[57:58.920 --> 58:07.920]  So you just tell him, no, I'm not drunk. I sign this way all the time.
[58:07.920 --> 58:11.920]  Got it. Got it.
[58:11.920 --> 58:14.920]  Well, you're breaking up badly there, Doug.
[58:14.920 --> 58:19.920]  I'm good anyway. I saw two good cops in one.
[58:19.920 --> 58:24.920]  Well, good. Try to, maybe they'll actually stay good cops. Who knows?
[58:24.920 --> 58:29.920]  But then again, it may have been having a good day, Doug.
[58:29.920 --> 58:31.920]  I hope I was.
[58:31.920 --> 58:34.920]  Yeah. Anything else?
[58:34.920 --> 58:36.920]  I better get it.
[58:36.920 --> 58:39.920]  Well, thanks for calling in.
[58:39.920 --> 58:43.920]  All right, folks, call in number 512-646-1984.
[58:43.920 --> 58:49.920]  This is the top of our break, so we'll be back in just a few minutes.
[58:49.920 --> 58:53.920]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world.
[58:53.920 --> 58:57.920]  Yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[58:57.920 --> 59:01.920]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:01.920 --> 59:06.920]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:06.920 --> 59:08.920]  Enter the Recovery Version.
[59:08.920 --> 59:12.920]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:12.920 --> 59:17.920]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:17.920 --> 59:21.920]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:21.920 --> 59:27.920]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:27.920 --> 59:32.920]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free Recovery Version simply for the asking.
[59:32.920 --> 59:43.920]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free at 1-888-551-0102
[59:43.920 --> 59:47.920]  or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:47.920 --> 59:50.920]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:50.920 --> 01:00:02.920]  You are listening to the Logos Radio Network, logosradionetwork.com.
[01:00:02.920 --> 01:00:09.920]  You're listening to The Liberty Beat, your daily source for Liberty news and activist updates,
[01:00:09.920 --> 01:00:14.920]  online at thelibertybeat.com.
[01:00:14.920 --> 01:00:19.920]  John Bush here with your Liberty Beat from Monday, November 11, 2013.
[01:00:19.920 --> 01:00:28.920]  Gold open today at $1,283, silver at $21.35, and bitcoin is trading at $345.
[01:00:28.920 --> 01:00:33.920]  Support for The Liberty Beat comes from Cabo Bob's Baja California style burritos.
[01:00:33.920 --> 01:00:38.920]  Visit their new location at 29th and Rio Grande between Guadalupe and Lamar.
[01:00:38.920 --> 01:00:45.920]  Call them at 512-432-1111 or find them online at cabobobs.com.
[01:00:45.920 --> 01:00:52.920]  Support also comes from Central Texas Gunworks, CHL courses, self-defense training, and firearm sales.
[01:00:52.920 --> 01:00:55.920]  Online at centraltexasgunworks.com.
[01:00:55.920 --> 01:00:56.920]  And now the news.
[01:00:56.920 --> 01:01:00.920]  Why wait for police when you could do it yourself as a family?
[01:01:00.920 --> 01:01:04.920]  That's the mindset adopted by the family of a kidnapped Deucin Louisiana woman.
[01:01:04.920 --> 01:01:10.920]  They tracked her down, freed her, and killed her alleged abductor identified as the father of her son.
[01:01:10.920 --> 01:01:16.920]  The family tells the advertiser they didn't know what to expect when showing up at the abandoned house they learned she was being held in.
[01:01:16.920 --> 01:01:22.920]  When they arrived early Friday, six family members kicked in the door and found the 29-year-old victim bloodied and stabbed.
[01:01:22.920 --> 01:01:27.920]  The alleged kidnapper Scott Thomas was there, gunfire erupted, and he was shot dead.
[01:01:27.920 --> 01:01:31.920]  The victim was transported for hospitalized treatment but is now back home.
[01:01:31.920 --> 01:01:37.920]  No charges will be filed in connection with Thomas' death.
[01:01:37.920 --> 01:01:46.920]  Lawyers for the Federal Election Commission have recommended that the commission approve the use of bitcoins as in-kind contributions to federal campaign committees.
[01:01:46.920 --> 01:01:53.920]  The USA Today reports that under the recommendation, political committees would not be allowed to spend the money or donate it to others.
[01:01:53.920 --> 01:01:59.920]  Commission members are expected to address the issue during a meeting on Thursday.
[01:01:59.920 --> 01:02:06.920]  Inadequate security measures at the NSA is what allowed Edward Snowden to reveal the extent of U.S. spying.
[01:02:06.920 --> 01:02:12.920]  Edward comes in a Reuters report that claims a handful of NSA employees gave their login information to Snowden.
[01:02:12.920 --> 01:02:17.920]  He apparently claimed the information was needed to do his job as a computer systems administrator.
[01:02:17.920 --> 01:02:25.920]  Support for the Liberty Beat comes from Brave New Books, your local source for Tangy Tangerine 2.0, One World Way, and Clearly Filtered,
[01:02:25.920 --> 01:02:30.920]  in Austin at 1904 Guadalupe Street and online at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:02:30.920 --> 01:02:37.920]  Support also comes from the Center for Natural Living, announcing their first monthly meeting, Saturday, November 23rd, at Brave New Books.
[01:02:37.920 --> 01:02:42.920]  The meeting will cover the Center's fluoride project, the volunteer opportunities at the Blush Family Farm,
[01:02:42.920 --> 01:02:46.920]  and will feature a screening of Episodes 1 through 3 of Sovereign Living, the show.
[01:02:46.920 --> 01:02:50.920]  Learn more at centerfornaturalliving.org.
[01:02:50.920 --> 01:02:55.920]  You're listening to the Liberty Beat for Monday, November 11th, 2013.
[01:02:55.920 --> 01:03:00.920]  Be sure to like us on Facebook at facebook.com slash The Liberty Beat.
[01:03:26.920 --> 01:03:30.920]  I won't pay for the war with my body.
[01:03:30.920 --> 01:03:34.920]  Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money.
[01:03:34.920 --> 01:03:37.920]  I won't pay for the fun with my body.
[01:03:37.920 --> 01:03:40.920]  They say France wicked and their logic shoddy.
[01:03:40.920 --> 01:03:44.920]  Ain't gonna pay for the war with my body.
[01:03:44.920 --> 01:03:46.920]  I won't pay for the war with my money.
[01:03:46.920 --> 01:03:51.920]  Alright folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio. I don't have any callers and I need some.
[01:03:51.920 --> 01:03:56.920]  Code 126461984. Give me a call. Give me a holler.
[01:03:56.920 --> 01:04:02.920]  Alright, I want to go back to this subject matter here for a little bit, at least until I get somebody else up on the board.
[01:04:02.920 --> 01:04:09.920]  I want to read you some more of this case law dealing with the right to resist these arrests.
[01:04:09.920 --> 01:04:16.920]  Let's see. These principles apply as well to an officer making or attempting to make an arrest
[01:04:16.920 --> 01:04:22.920]  who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence
[01:04:22.920 --> 01:04:27.920]  as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.
[01:04:27.920 --> 01:04:36.920]  Jones v. State, 26, Texas, Appellate 1. Beaver v. State, 4, Texas, Appellate 1 and 75.
[01:04:36.920 --> 01:04:41.920]  Skidmore v. State, 43, Texas, 93 and 903.
[01:04:41.920 --> 01:04:44.920]  An illegal arrest is an assault and battery.
[01:04:44.920 --> 01:04:50.920]  The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself
[01:04:50.920 --> 01:04:56.920]  as he would in repelling any other assault and battery. State v. Robinson.
[01:04:56.920 --> 01:04:59.920]  Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest.
[01:04:59.920 --> 01:05:05.920]  In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer
[01:05:05.920 --> 01:05:09.920]  and may be resisted by the use of force as in self-defense.
[01:05:09.920 --> 01:05:14.920]  So let's consider for a moment excessive force.
[01:05:14.920 --> 01:05:20.920]  Let's take the argument of excessive force and apply it to an arrest made at a traffic stop
[01:05:20.920 --> 01:05:24.920]  that involves not only the shattering of your windows and damage to your property,
[01:05:24.920 --> 01:05:29.920]  but a physical assault and battery upon your own person
[01:05:29.920 --> 01:05:37.920]  because the officer didn't like how fast or how well you complied with their demands.
[01:05:37.920 --> 01:05:46.920]  When does their escalation of force become justified so as to nullify your justification to resist?
[01:05:46.920 --> 01:05:56.920]  How can you be incarcerated justifiably by an officer
[01:05:56.920 --> 01:06:08.920]  when the alleged offense itself forbids incarceration as a part of the punishment?
[01:06:08.920 --> 01:06:12.920]  Now, if you think about this reasonably, there is no reasonable way to assert
[01:06:12.920 --> 01:06:19.920]  that if the only offense you can allege against me is one that produces a fine-only result,
[01:06:19.920 --> 01:06:29.920]  that you have the authority to use force against me in any manner.
[01:06:29.920 --> 01:06:31.920]  You just don't.
[01:06:31.920 --> 01:06:40.920]  Whether I comply with you or not, the offense itself does not allow the use of force.
[01:06:40.920 --> 01:06:47.920]  It's a fine-only offense.
[01:06:47.920 --> 01:06:57.920]  So unless I act in some manner that imminently produces a threat to your life and well-being,
[01:06:57.920 --> 01:07:05.920]  you have no defense of the use of force to facilitate an arrest that is not authorized.
[01:07:05.920 --> 01:07:09.920]  And when I say arrest in this case, I mean incarceration
[01:07:09.920 --> 01:07:19.920]  because the moment you seize the person and you fail to deliver them to a magistrate
[01:07:19.920 --> 01:07:25.920]  for a determination of probable cause not only of whether or not the offense itself is valid,
[01:07:25.920 --> 01:07:35.920]  but whether or not the arrest related to that offense was justified under the law without a warrant.
[01:07:35.920 --> 01:07:40.920]  You are guilty of false imprisonment.
[01:07:40.920 --> 01:07:49.920]  No law grants a peace officer the authority to incarcerate.
[01:07:49.920 --> 01:07:58.920]  Again, the courts themselves have carved out a very narrow niche for that to take place.
[01:07:58.920 --> 01:08:07.920]  And that is only if something actually prevents the officer from acting with due diligence,
[01:08:07.920 --> 01:08:17.920]  such as a natural disaster or some form of public disturbance, such as a riot, an invasion, or some act of war,
[01:08:17.920 --> 01:08:28.920]  something of that nature that would prevent the officer from seeking a magistrate with due diligence.
[01:08:28.920 --> 01:08:33.920]  So how then do these officers continue to take people to jail?
[01:08:33.920 --> 01:08:41.920]  Well, they continue to do it the same way they continue to make accusations that photographing them in public is illegal,
[01:08:41.920 --> 01:08:47.920]  that you don't have a right to record them, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
[01:08:47.920 --> 01:08:58.920]  They do it because no one takes them to task for making such a blatant assertion in violation of your rights
[01:08:58.920 --> 01:09:03.920]  and the laws surrounding their actions.
[01:09:03.920 --> 01:09:07.920]  But in all fairness, that's because it's very expensive to do that.
[01:09:07.920 --> 01:09:12.920]  And the system has intentionally rigged it to make that the case.
[01:09:12.920 --> 01:09:21.920]  It is very hard for someone to get justice against one of these guys, or more of these guys for that matter,
[01:09:21.920 --> 01:09:26.920]  when they have the deep pocket of the states defending them for their illegal acts,
[01:09:26.920 --> 01:09:34.920]  while you, the private citizen who is not independently wealthy by any stretch of the imagination,
[01:09:34.920 --> 01:09:43.920]  must scrounge every penny to pay for any lawyers to defend your case and take it to court.
[01:09:43.920 --> 01:09:50.920]  And of course, everything being relative and equal, the more you pay your attorney,
[01:09:50.920 --> 01:09:55.920]  the more he might actually do before he steals your money,
[01:09:55.920 --> 01:10:05.920]  in which case he may actually put on a good lawsuit and seek a good result on your behalf.
[01:10:05.920 --> 01:10:12.920]  But generally speaking, they will do that only if they are, one, big enough to take it on contingency,
[01:10:12.920 --> 01:10:19.920]  two, they feel that they absolutely cannot lose,
[01:10:19.920 --> 01:10:26.920]  and three, they know what the hell they're doing, which is becoming more and more clear.
[01:10:26.920 --> 01:10:28.920]  A lot of them don't.
[01:10:28.920 --> 01:10:35.920]  How can the attorneys know what they're doing if the judges that came from attorneys don't know what they're doing?
[01:10:35.920 --> 01:10:40.920]  You have these judges that obviously can't read law, can't understand law,
[01:10:40.920 --> 01:10:49.920]  can't read statute and understand statute, and refuse to abide by any of it, even when it's written right there in black and white,
[01:10:49.920 --> 01:10:53.920]  and decide instead that they are the only law that matters.
[01:10:53.920 --> 01:11:00.920]  What comes out of their mouth is how the legislature should have written it.
[01:11:00.920 --> 01:11:06.920]  So we'll just go ahead and do it for them.
[01:11:06.920 --> 01:11:10.920]  Now, we see this every single day.
[01:11:10.920 --> 01:11:19.920]  And yet, we haven't had a judge pinata in how many decades now?
[01:11:19.920 --> 01:11:26.920]  We haven't had a single riding out of town on a rail covered in tar and feathers for how long now?
[01:11:26.920 --> 01:11:29.920]  These practices should have never left the American way of life.
[01:11:29.920 --> 01:11:32.920]  I guarantee you they shouldn't have.
[01:11:32.920 --> 01:11:42.920]  When a public servant violates the public trust, that public servant should be swinging in the town square
[01:11:42.920 --> 01:11:49.920]  before he has a chance to do it again as an example to those that come behind him.
[01:11:49.920 --> 01:11:52.920]  Isn't that the excuse they say for that capital punishment works?
[01:11:52.920 --> 01:11:56.920]  And don't get me wrong, I'm all for capital punishment.
[01:11:56.920 --> 01:11:58.920]  In the proper cases, I'm all for it.
[01:11:58.920 --> 01:12:03.920]  I don't think rehabilitation works for everybody, and I guarantee you,
[01:12:03.920 --> 01:12:06.920]  once you electrocute them, they're 100% rehabilitated.
[01:12:06.920 --> 01:12:14.920]  They will never commit that crime again, period.
[01:12:14.920 --> 01:12:23.920]  So in the case of these politicians, I don't think any of them are at the point where they're redeemable
[01:12:23.920 --> 01:12:29.920]  when they've betrayed us more times than they've ever told us the truth.
[01:12:29.920 --> 01:12:31.920]  And they should be treated accordingly.
[01:12:31.920 --> 01:12:34.920]  We should be holding them accountable in our courts,
[01:12:34.920 --> 01:12:39.920]  and we should be holding the courts themselves accountable when they don't enforce our rights and our law
[01:12:39.920 --> 01:12:43.920]  as we wrote it into the Constitution for these people to obey.
[01:12:43.920 --> 01:12:47.920]  But again, the Constitution cannot enforce itself, people.
[01:12:47.920 --> 01:12:49.920]  That's us.
[01:12:49.920 --> 01:12:51.920]  We have to enforce it.
[01:12:51.920 --> 01:12:53.920]  They just ignore it.
[01:12:53.920 --> 01:12:57.920]  They do it for their own ends every time.
[01:12:57.920 --> 01:12:59.920]  All right, we got some more callers up here.
[01:12:59.920 --> 01:13:01.920]  We're going to go to Nancy in Texas.
[01:13:01.920 --> 01:13:04.920]  Nancy, what can I do for you?
[01:13:04.920 --> 01:13:15.920]  Tell me what I can do to a bad judge and how I can – my life has been totally ruined by a bad judge.
[01:13:15.920 --> 01:13:18.920]  Okay.
[01:13:18.920 --> 01:13:21.920]  All right, can you explain – or do you want to explain that a little bit?
[01:13:21.920 --> 01:13:25.920]  Yeah, I can tell you the whole story, but it goes for years.
[01:13:25.920 --> 01:13:31.920]  So bottom line, my – he's 92 now, or 90.
[01:13:31.920 --> 01:13:35.920]  My ex-husband and I got a divorce in 09.
[01:13:35.920 --> 01:13:39.920]  The kids talked him in – and it was his idea.
[01:13:39.920 --> 01:13:43.920]  The kids talked him into contesting it.
[01:13:43.920 --> 01:13:44.920]  He didn't contest anything.
[01:13:44.920 --> 01:13:46.920]  It wasn't just to get it done.
[01:13:46.920 --> 01:13:48.920]  The kids talked him into contesting it.
[01:13:48.920 --> 01:13:52.920]  So they were tired of waiting for their inheritance.
[01:13:52.920 --> 01:13:53.920]  I'm 78.
[01:13:53.920 --> 01:13:56.920]  He's 90 at this time.
[01:13:56.920 --> 01:13:59.920]  He was just a few years younger.
[01:13:59.920 --> 01:14:09.920]  And so the judge made the remark – not on record, but he made the remark, I'm tired of giving the women everything when the man gets the divorce.
[01:14:09.920 --> 01:14:13.920]  He – at this time, it's going to be different.
[01:14:13.920 --> 01:14:20.920]  He explained to the attorney for the kids – actually, my husband, but it was them.
[01:14:20.920 --> 01:14:24.920]  They had no case, and it should have been thrown out right there.
[01:14:24.920 --> 01:14:28.920]  He explained to them how they could go about winning this case.
[01:14:28.920 --> 01:14:31.920]  We're still in court.
[01:14:31.920 --> 01:14:39.920]  We moved it to a little higher court, but this guy is covering the backside of the other court.
[01:14:39.920 --> 01:14:43.920]  And –
[01:14:43.920 --> 01:14:45.920]  Well, that's common enough.
[01:14:45.920 --> 01:14:46.920]  Yeah.
[01:14:46.920 --> 01:14:58.920]  I would like – I hope if I live long enough to write a book on it, because this should never happen to anybody, let alone somebody else again.
[01:14:58.920 --> 01:14:59.920]  That's my point.
[01:14:59.920 --> 01:15:06.920]  I don't want it to happen to anybody else again, although it's – I'm sure I'm not the first that's happened.
[01:15:06.920 --> 01:15:12.920]  I'd like to know what I can do, and how can I get that damn judge removed.
[01:15:12.920 --> 01:15:18.920]  Well, I wish you luck.
[01:15:18.920 --> 01:15:23.920]  Was there – the – I don't know that you can get him removed.
[01:15:23.920 --> 01:15:30.920]  The only way you can get him removed, or even attempt to get him removed, is to prove that he had some form of misconduct,
[01:15:30.920 --> 01:15:36.920]  in which case you're going to have to have evidence that would prove his misconduct.
[01:15:36.920 --> 01:15:39.920]  Misconduct like why?
[01:15:39.920 --> 01:15:44.920]  Well, for instance, he acted in a way that was fraudulent.
[01:15:44.920 --> 01:15:57.920]  He acted in a way to enrich himself or someone that he knew at the – by defrauding you or your husband or someone else in the case.
[01:15:57.920 --> 01:16:06.920]  I mean, just things of that nature, or that he's outright ignored the law to the point of causing harm and thus doing something that's criminal.
[01:16:06.920 --> 01:16:09.920]  Those are about the only ways you're going to do it.
[01:16:09.920 --> 01:16:24.920]  I can – yeah, I can say that he outright ignored the Supreme Court rulings, and he did cause me harm when he told the kids how they could go about.
[01:16:24.920 --> 01:16:31.920]  They declared my husband incompetent, and then the kids turned around and they're going to declare me incompetent.
[01:16:31.920 --> 01:16:38.920]  He knew I wasn't, so he said, well, he's not limited to killing now, so you have to do it, and then he's going to win.
[01:16:38.920 --> 01:16:39.920]  Yeah. Okay, Nancy.
[01:16:39.920 --> 01:16:40.920]  Hang on a second.
[01:16:40.920 --> 01:16:42.920]  We're going to go to break, and I'll pick you up when we get back, okay?
[01:16:42.920 --> 01:16:43.920]  Okay.
[01:16:43.920 --> 01:16:44.920]  All right, folks.
[01:16:44.920 --> 01:16:48.920]  This is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:16:48.920 --> 01:16:54.920]  Nick, JP, I see you there on the board as well, so y'all hang on, and I'll continue with this when we get back.
[01:16:54.920 --> 01:17:23.920]  Y'all hold on.
[01:17:24.920 --> 01:17:45.920]  Okay.
[01:17:45.920 --> 01:18:00.920]  Okay.
[01:18:00.920 --> 01:18:15.920]  Thank you.
[01:18:15.920 --> 01:18:30.920]  Thank you.
[01:18:30.920 --> 01:18:45.920]  Thank you.
[01:18:45.920 --> 01:19:00.920]  Thank you.
[01:19:00.920 --> 01:19:15.920]  Thank you.
[01:19:15.920 --> 01:19:37.920]  Thank you.
[01:19:37.920 --> 01:19:38.920]  Hi, folks.
[01:19:38.920 --> 01:19:39.920]  We are back.
[01:19:39.920 --> 01:19:40.920]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:19:40.920 --> 01:19:42.920]  We're going to try to finish up with Nancy here.
[01:19:42.920 --> 01:19:45.920]  All right, Ms. Nancy, go ahead.
[01:19:45.920 --> 01:19:46.920]  Okay.
[01:19:46.920 --> 01:19:56.920]  Well, we told the kid lawyer how he could go about making a case because there was no case.
[01:19:56.920 --> 01:20:09.920]  I have a copy of each of the court proceedings in my possession, and so consequently, they went forward with this.
[01:20:09.920 --> 01:20:15.920]  They found somebody to, you know, he was about 88.
[01:20:15.920 --> 01:20:25.920]  When you get to be that old, it's easy enough to find a psychiatrist to declare you incompetent, especially if you want to be declared incompetent.
[01:20:25.920 --> 01:20:40.920]  And I have lost, all right, the kids intend to take the ranch, and they've already taken $300,000 that I had in the safe at the ranch.
[01:20:40.920 --> 01:21:04.920]  And he has the judge, I had a note, and the judge gave my son money from the note to take care for being a guardian for my husband, which was actually my buddy.
[01:21:04.920 --> 01:21:13.920]  And, you know, they have actually probably beaten my husband, that I don't know of, out of some money too, both of us.
[01:21:13.920 --> 01:21:18.920]  But anyway, you name it, and they threatened me with my life.
[01:21:18.920 --> 01:21:31.920]  They have now in debt, never been in debt in my life except for land, and they have violated the federal laws.
[01:21:31.920 --> 01:21:44.920]  You know, I am financially and emotionally, etc., so forth and so on, then you could call it abuse or whatever you want to call it.
[01:21:44.920 --> 01:21:45.920]  I forget what the name is.
[01:21:45.920 --> 01:21:51.920]  I can look it up, that you're not supposed to do that, old elderly people.
[01:21:51.920 --> 01:22:04.920]  And I've got those things, and like I said, there's been several lawyers on the case, on both.
[01:22:04.920 --> 01:22:12.920]  They've had two, and I've had one of my lawyers decided that she could no longer do it, her health was bad.
[01:22:12.920 --> 01:22:18.920]  And of course, there wasn't any money at the point, because they got it all tied up.
[01:22:18.920 --> 01:22:22.920]  They did the less tens on the only thing that I...
[01:22:22.920 --> 01:22:23.920]  Okay.
[01:22:23.920 --> 01:22:27.920]  Is all this dealing with a divorce court, or is this a probate court?
[01:22:27.920 --> 01:22:34.920]  Nancy, Nancy, is this a probate court or a divorce court?
[01:22:34.920 --> 01:22:41.920]  It was a divorce court, and it's been a probate court too, but it's still a divorce.
[01:22:41.920 --> 01:22:53.920]  We've had a final divorce, and he declared it a final divorce, and now then we've gone the whole spectrum back and forth.
[01:22:53.920 --> 01:22:54.920]  Okay.
[01:22:54.920 --> 01:23:00.920]  And he decided to declare me incompetent, and of course, couldn't.
[01:23:00.920 --> 01:23:07.920]  Well, have you filed any charges against this judge, or any judicial conduct complaints?
[01:23:07.920 --> 01:23:11.920]  No, I should file a judicial...
[01:23:11.920 --> 01:23:13.920]  Hell, he owes me money.
[01:23:13.920 --> 01:23:24.920]  He's the reason that I lost it, and I've never been in debt before in my life, and he's the reason that I'm in debt now.
[01:23:24.920 --> 01:23:28.920]  I mean, okay, I should write to the bar.
[01:23:28.920 --> 01:23:30.920]  Is that what you're saying?
[01:23:30.920 --> 01:23:33.920]  No, not to the bar, the judicial conduct committee.
[01:23:33.920 --> 01:23:38.920]  You make a judicial conduct complaint against him.
[01:23:38.920 --> 01:23:41.920]  Judicial conduct, okay.
[01:23:41.920 --> 01:23:51.920]  Yeah, and you can also file criminal charges if you can show what criminal harm he's caused against you or someone that you know.
[01:23:51.920 --> 01:24:02.920]  Okay, would loss of financial responsibility, which I still have, but I'm in debt, loss of finances and loss...
[01:24:02.920 --> 01:24:03.920]  Well, that's a lawsuit.
[01:24:03.920 --> 01:24:06.920]  That's a different thing.
[01:24:06.920 --> 01:24:10.920]  And you can't sue him if he's acting properly in his judge's capacity.
[01:24:10.920 --> 01:24:15.920]  So the first thing you have to show is that he was not acting properly in his judge's capacity.
[01:24:15.920 --> 01:24:19.920]  Therefore, he was not acting as a judge.
[01:24:19.920 --> 01:24:23.920]  Then he's susceptible to suit.
[01:24:23.920 --> 01:24:35.920]  Well, I'll tell you what, he uses the laws he likes, and if he doesn't like a law, he throws it out and makes his own, starting with a judge who is a mean type fellow.
[01:24:35.920 --> 01:24:46.920]  Well, again, family courts and things like that, they're probably some of the worst places to have to get into, especially in Texas.
[01:24:46.920 --> 01:24:49.920]  But those are the things you're going to have to look at first.
[01:24:49.920 --> 01:24:55.920]  You're going to have to look at what criminal things he may have done, what violations of law he may have committed,
[01:24:55.920 --> 01:25:03.920]  and then you're going to have to file the complaints with the Judicial Conduct Committee and criminal complaints if he has actual criminal acts.
[01:25:03.920 --> 01:25:07.920]  But that's where I'd recommend you start.
[01:25:07.920 --> 01:25:10.920]  With the Judicial Conduct Committee?
[01:25:10.920 --> 01:25:12.920]  Judicial Conduct Committee, yes.
[01:25:12.920 --> 01:25:13.920]  Okay.
[01:25:13.920 --> 01:25:14.920]  Okay.
[01:25:14.920 --> 01:25:15.920]  Thank you, myself.
[01:25:15.920 --> 01:25:17.920]  You're welcome.
[01:25:17.920 --> 01:25:20.920]  All right, now we're going to go to Nick in Texas.
[01:25:20.920 --> 01:25:22.920]  Nick, what can we do for you?
[01:25:22.920 --> 01:25:24.920]  Yeah, I have a few questions for you tonight, Eddie.
[01:25:24.920 --> 01:25:26.920]  How are you doing, first of all?
[01:25:26.920 --> 01:25:27.920]  Well, doing all right.
[01:25:27.920 --> 01:25:28.920]  What's your question?
[01:25:28.920 --> 01:25:31.920]  All right, my question is about the grass cops.
[01:25:31.920 --> 01:25:43.920]  I was wondering, on another show you did earlier, you were saying that it was against another code, I mean, against another statute for them to make a government code.
[01:25:43.920 --> 01:25:47.920]  Is that type of regulation?
[01:25:47.920 --> 01:25:49.920]  Do you know of any?
[01:25:49.920 --> 01:25:50.920]  No.
[01:25:50.920 --> 01:25:51.920]  Okay.
[01:25:51.920 --> 01:25:53.920]  I'm not saying it's against a code.
[01:25:53.920 --> 01:25:54.920]  Okay.
[01:25:54.920 --> 01:25:57.920]  I'm saying that ordinances are not laws.
[01:25:57.920 --> 01:26:09.920]  They do not comply with Article III, Section 29 through 36, 54, or I'm sorry, 56 and 64 of the Texas Constitution regarding how laws are enacted
[01:26:09.920 --> 01:26:18.920]  and what must happen in order for that enactment to have the force in effect of law after it's been made into a properly signed, enrolled bill.
[01:26:18.920 --> 01:26:21.920]  It's got nothing to do with a code.
[01:26:21.920 --> 01:26:22.920]  Right.
[01:26:22.920 --> 01:26:23.920]  Okay.
[01:26:23.920 --> 01:26:24.920]  Okay.
[01:26:24.920 --> 01:26:28.920]  An ordinance is not a law.
[01:26:28.920 --> 01:26:50.920]  The legal questions you have to get answers to are the issues being, does a municipality act in its proprietary capacity as a corporation if its ordinance is based on no state law?
[01:26:50.920 --> 01:26:51.920]  All right.
[01:26:51.920 --> 01:26:55.920]  The reasonable answer to that is, of course.
[01:26:55.920 --> 01:27:07.920]  So if there's no state law underpinning what the ordinance is attempting to do, then the ordinance is enacted entirely as a corporate policy rule.
[01:27:07.920 --> 01:27:14.920]  Now, in any corporation, who is bound by corporate policy?
[01:27:14.920 --> 01:27:15.920]  The employees.
[01:27:15.920 --> 01:27:22.920]  And who else?
[01:27:22.920 --> 01:27:23.920]  I don't know what.
[01:27:23.920 --> 01:27:28.920]  Those that are contracted with the corporation.
[01:27:28.920 --> 01:27:31.920]  Why did they get the contract?
[01:27:31.920 --> 01:27:37.920]  Well, however anybody does get a contract, by agreement, of course.
[01:27:37.920 --> 01:27:41.920]  I don't remember a contract.
[01:27:41.920 --> 01:27:45.920]  Well, that's because you probably don't have one.
[01:27:45.920 --> 01:27:46.920]  Okay.
[01:27:46.920 --> 01:27:49.920]  Would that be something to ask them to discover?
[01:27:49.920 --> 01:27:53.920]  No, this is a legal issue you ask in your pleadings.
[01:27:53.920 --> 01:28:01.920]  What you can do is try to get basically an administrative determination as to certain things.
[01:28:01.920 --> 01:28:02.920]  Okay.
[01:28:02.920 --> 01:28:04.920]  It's called a declaratory judgment.
[01:28:04.920 --> 01:28:12.920]  The declaratory judgment, you're asking for answers or rulings on specific legal issues.
[01:28:12.920 --> 01:28:21.920]  You're making specific legal arguments as to how you believe the issue should be answered.
[01:28:21.920 --> 01:28:30.920]  And in the court, if they agree with you, then you get a binding ruling by a court that says, yes, this is the way things are.
[01:28:30.920 --> 01:28:51.920]  So one of your legal issues is, is an ordinance enacted entirely under a municipality's proprietary side rather than its governmental side if there is no underpinning state law or foundational state law?
[01:28:51.920 --> 01:28:54.920]  And, of course, that's going to have to be a yes.
[01:28:54.920 --> 01:29:05.920]  The other issue is, does a municipality act solely in a proprietary form rather than a governmental form when such an ordinance is at issue?
[01:29:05.920 --> 01:29:09.920]  And, again, that would have to be yes.
[01:29:09.920 --> 01:29:15.920]  Anything they're doing in an entirely proprietary sense is not binding on you.
[01:29:15.920 --> 01:29:18.920]  You have to consent to it.
[01:29:18.920 --> 01:29:22.920]  And that includes the cops?
[01:29:22.920 --> 01:29:25.920]  Well, again, that depends on what the cops are enforcing.
[01:29:25.920 --> 01:29:38.920]  If they're enforcing an ordinance that has no state law backing, then they're enforcing that ordinance illegally when you don't consent to accepting it and participating in it.
[01:29:38.920 --> 01:29:39.920]  All right.
[01:29:39.920 --> 01:29:41.920]  Okay.
[01:29:41.920 --> 01:29:42.920]  I appreciate that.
[01:29:42.920 --> 01:29:43.920]  All right.
[01:29:43.920 --> 01:29:44.920]  Thanks for calling in.
[01:29:44.920 --> 01:29:45.920]  Bye-bye.
[01:29:45.920 --> 01:29:46.920]  Bye-bye.
[01:29:46.920 --> 01:29:51.920]  All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio calling number 512-646-1984.
[01:29:51.920 --> 01:29:53.920]  We'll be right back after this break.
[01:29:53.920 --> 01:29:54.920]  J.P., you hang on.
[01:29:54.920 --> 01:30:01.920]  You are next.
[01:30:01.920 --> 01:30:06.920]  A homeless man steals 100 bucks if a judge gives him a 15-year sentence.
[01:30:06.920 --> 01:30:10.920]  The next day, a CEO who swindled 3 billion gets just 3 years.
[01:30:10.920 --> 01:30:11.920]  What gives?
[01:30:11.920 --> 01:30:14.920]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back with the details.
[01:30:14.920 --> 01:30:22.920]  Your search engine is watching you, recording all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information.
[01:30:22.920 --> 01:30:23.920]  That's creepy.
[01:30:23.920 --> 01:30:25.920]  But it doesn't have to be that way.
[01:30:25.920 --> 01:30:28.920]  Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:28.920 --> 01:30:34.920]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified.
[01:30:34.920 --> 01:30:39.920]  If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage.
[01:30:39.920 --> 01:30:41.920]  Great search results and total privacy.
[01:30:41.920 --> 01:30:44.920]  Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine.
[01:30:44.920 --> 01:30:51.920]  Two years ago in Louisiana, Roy Brown, a black homeless man, robbed a bank and made off with $100.
[01:30:51.920 --> 01:30:58.920]  Remorseful, he surrendered to police the next day, returned the money, and pleaded guilty, saying his mama didn't raise him that way.
[01:30:58.920 --> 01:31:01.920]  The judge was unmoved and sentenced him to 15 years.
[01:31:01.920 --> 01:31:07.920]  Just one day later, a Virginia judge handed down a mere 40-month prison sentence to Paul Allen,
[01:31:07.920 --> 01:31:12.920]  a white investment tycoon who helped embezzle more than $3 billion.
[01:31:12.920 --> 01:31:17.920]  Paul Allen will be back on the golf course before Roy Brown is even up for parole.
[01:31:17.920 --> 01:31:19.920]  Could anything be more unfair?
[01:31:19.920 --> 01:31:24.920]  Obviously, discrimination is alive and well in our courts, and it's a crying shame.
[01:31:24.920 --> 01:31:25.920]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht.
[01:31:25.920 --> 01:31:30.920]  More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:31:30.920 --> 01:31:35.920]  Here at Zombie Killer Ammo and Guns, we believe that the Second Amendment guarantees our rights as citizens
[01:31:35.920 --> 01:31:38.920]  to be able to defend ourselves and our loved ones.
[01:31:38.920 --> 01:31:43.920]  We also believe that the right to carry weapons comes with the responsibility of being safe and smart about guns.
[01:31:43.920 --> 01:31:50.920]  So if you're going to be in the Corpus Christi area, give us a call at 361-704-6103,
[01:31:50.920 --> 01:31:54.920]  ask for Chris or Portia, and mention this radio ad for a 10% discount.
[01:31:54.920 --> 01:31:56.920]  We can ship ammo, parts, and accessories.
[01:31:56.920 --> 01:32:00.920]  Like us on Facebook at Zombie Killers, LLC.
[01:32:00.920 --> 01:32:03.920]  Nutritious food is real body armor.
[01:32:03.920 --> 01:32:09.920]  It burns muscle, burns fat, improves digestion, and feeds the entire body the nutrients it needs.
[01:32:09.920 --> 01:32:13.920]  Did you know the U.S. government banned a hemp plant from growing in the United States
[01:32:13.920 --> 01:32:17.920]  and classified it as a Schedule I drug to hide it behind a marijuana plant?
[01:32:17.920 --> 01:32:23.920]  People have been confused about this plant for over 80 years, and many still don't know what hemp is.
[01:32:23.920 --> 01:32:27.920]  So now you know hemp is not marijuana, and marijuana is not hemp.
[01:32:27.920 --> 01:32:30.920]  They are different varieties of the same species.
[01:32:30.920 --> 01:32:33.920]  HempUSA.org wants the world to know these basic facts,
[01:32:33.920 --> 01:32:39.920]  and to help people understand that hemp protein powder is the best kept health secret you need to know about.
[01:32:39.920 --> 01:32:48.920]  Remember, hemp protein powder contains 53% protein, is gluten-free, anti-inflammatory, non-GMO, and is loaded with nutrients.
[01:32:48.920 --> 01:32:57.920]  Call 888-910-4367, 888-910-4367, and see what our powder, seeds, and oil can do for you.
[01:32:57.920 --> 01:33:00.920]  HempUSA.org
[01:33:00.920 --> 01:33:25.920]  You're listening to the Logos Radio Network at logosradio.com.
[01:33:30.920 --> 01:33:35.920]  All right, folks.
[01:33:35.920 --> 01:33:36.920]  We are back.
[01:33:36.920 --> 01:33:38.920]  This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:33:38.920 --> 01:33:39.920]  All right.
[01:33:39.920 --> 01:33:41.920]  Now we're going to go to JP in Texas.
[01:33:41.920 --> 01:33:42.920]  JP is my last caller.
[01:33:42.920 --> 01:33:43.920]  I need some more.
[01:33:43.920 --> 01:33:46.920]  512-646-1984.
[01:33:46.920 --> 01:33:48.920]  JP, what can we do for you?
[01:33:48.920 --> 01:33:49.920]  Evening, Eddie.
[01:33:49.920 --> 01:33:57.920]  I got a pretty classic case of a false arrest, but it's been the proceedings since then in which I've suffered two more false arrests
[01:33:57.920 --> 01:34:05.920]  that are the interesting points, and I have a question to finish up with as soon as I lay some groundwork.
[01:34:05.920 --> 01:34:06.920]  Okay.
[01:34:06.920 --> 01:34:14.920]  I pulled over for a transportation code violation, and on the offense report, the officer basically admits that he arrested me for these offenses,
[01:34:14.920 --> 01:34:23.920]  which were fair to produce an ID, which I did, just not a driver's license, and failure to have and display registration, and the other six offenses.
[01:34:23.920 --> 01:34:27.920]  So long story short, I go to jail. I get out.
[01:34:27.920 --> 01:34:29.920]  I go to a hearing.
[01:34:29.920 --> 01:34:36.920]  They arrest me for failure to appear while I'm at the hearing.
[01:34:36.920 --> 01:34:38.920]  They pull me out of the courtroom.
[01:34:38.920 --> 01:34:39.920]  They take me to jail.
[01:34:39.920 --> 01:34:43.920]  The cops tell me that I'm not there, and they take me to jail.
[01:34:43.920 --> 01:34:44.920]  Okay.
[01:34:44.920 --> 01:34:45.920]  That happened.
[01:34:45.920 --> 01:34:55.920]  So I go to the hearing for that, the classy misdemeanor of failing to appear, which is in violation of 3810.
[01:34:55.920 --> 01:34:58.920]  He says I can't issue an arrest warrant for that.
[01:34:58.920 --> 01:34:59.920]  They didn't.
[01:34:59.920 --> 01:35:04.920]  So the judge tells me that I can go home this time.
[01:35:04.920 --> 01:35:06.920]  He issued a warrant for my arrest.
[01:35:06.920 --> 01:35:12.920]  Now, it's become very clear that the fictitious plaintiff isn't going to state their claim,
[01:35:12.920 --> 01:35:20.920]  and they keep using warrants of arrest to have me taken away from the court instead of to the court to be dealt with according to law.
[01:35:20.920 --> 01:35:23.920]  So I walk out of the courtroom.
[01:35:23.920 --> 01:35:26.920]  I go across the streets to the police station to file a complaint.
[01:35:26.920 --> 01:35:30.920]  They gang up on me and start yelling and screaming at me.
[01:35:30.920 --> 01:35:31.920]  So I leave.
[01:35:31.920 --> 01:35:33.920]  There's no remedy there.
[01:35:33.920 --> 01:35:40.920]  Realizing that they set me loose for a manhunt because I know what they want to do, because I feel like I'm being targeted,
[01:35:40.920 --> 01:35:48.920]  I go back into the courtroom, and I say I have business with the court, and I hear there's an arrest warrant for my arrest.
[01:35:48.920 --> 01:35:51.920]  And how do we proceed?
[01:35:51.920 --> 01:35:53.920]  And this wasn't interrupting anything.
[01:35:53.920 --> 01:35:55.920]  This is between victims.
[01:35:55.920 --> 01:36:02.920]  So the judge tells his policemen, bailiffs and policemen, to put me in custody,
[01:36:02.920 --> 01:36:12.920]  and they arrest me for hindering court proceedings, which is a Class B misdemeanor, which effectively kicks it into another court.
[01:36:12.920 --> 01:36:19.920]  So my main question for you is I've heard you talk about this subject before,
[01:36:19.920 --> 01:36:26.920]  and there obviously was no intent to fail to appear since I was there both times,
[01:36:26.920 --> 01:36:34.920]  is where does it say that – how should I say this?
[01:36:34.920 --> 01:36:41.920]  That they have – that that's not fair to appear, that the worst they could do is reset the court hearing, the court date?
[01:36:41.920 --> 01:36:44.920]  Well, it doesn't specifically say that.
[01:36:44.920 --> 01:36:45.920]  Okay.
[01:36:45.920 --> 01:36:47.920]  Well, I wasn't sure if it did or not.
[01:36:47.920 --> 01:36:49.920]  I just gleaned that from a –
[01:36:49.920 --> 01:36:52.920]  No, it's inferred by what isn't written.
[01:36:52.920 --> 01:36:53.920]  Okay.
[01:36:53.920 --> 01:36:57.920]  The way it works is when you're arrested without a warrant,
[01:36:57.920 --> 01:37:02.920]  that kicks in Chapter 14 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, arrest without warrant.
[01:37:02.920 --> 01:37:03.920]  Right.
[01:37:03.920 --> 01:37:10.920]  If you're issued a citation in lieu of being taken before a magistrate and you appear in compliance with that citation,
[01:37:10.920 --> 01:37:18.920]  that invokes 15.17g of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:37:18.920 --> 01:37:35.920]  In 15.17g, it speaks directly to failure to appear on the notice to appear under the provisions of 14.06c, which are A and B misdemeanors.
[01:37:35.920 --> 01:37:36.920]  Right.
[01:37:36.920 --> 01:37:37.920]  Okay.
[01:37:37.920 --> 01:37:48.920]  It specifically omits references to issuing warrants for Class Cs, which is 14.06b.
[01:37:48.920 --> 01:37:49.920]  Okay.
[01:37:49.920 --> 01:37:57.920]  What about issuing arrest warrants for Class D misdemeanors, which is in violation of Penal Code 3810e,
[01:37:57.920 --> 01:38:08.920]  which says if the originating charge is a Class D misdemeanor, then failure to appear in itself is punishable by fine only.
[01:38:08.920 --> 01:38:10.920]  Yeah, and?
[01:38:10.920 --> 01:38:14.920]  And it's happened three times.
[01:38:14.920 --> 01:38:24.920]  I have filed judicial complaints, and the judge was still sitting the second and third time I made my special appearance.
[01:38:24.920 --> 01:38:31.920]  However, he's gone now for whatever reason, I don't know.
[01:38:31.920 --> 01:38:34.920]  They issued these arrest warrants in violation of that.
[01:38:34.920 --> 01:38:44.920]  But then again, they also arrested me for Class C misdemeanors, which is, of course, in violation of 1223 of Penal Code.
[01:38:44.920 --> 01:38:53.920]  So, long story short, I suffered three false arrests, and I think they're just trying to rope it up me and wear me out.
[01:38:53.920 --> 01:38:58.920]  But now they have me on a Class B charge, which is a patent lie.
[01:38:58.920 --> 01:39:01.920]  I didn't disturb any proceedings.
[01:39:01.920 --> 01:39:04.920]  I just went in there to turn myself over to the court.
[01:39:04.920 --> 01:39:16.920]  And, you know, they've been getting really angry at me for calling them out on Transportation Code, which doesn't apply to me.
[01:39:16.920 --> 01:39:20.920]  Or that's my claim, at least.
[01:39:20.920 --> 01:39:23.920]  All right. I'm sorry. Say that one more time.
[01:39:23.920 --> 01:39:24.920]  That last part?
[01:39:24.920 --> 01:39:32.920]  That's my understanding of my claim that I wasn't required to produce driver's license as it's the Occupational License Instructional Permit,
[01:39:32.920 --> 01:39:37.920]  which is the claim of why I was arrested because I failed the ID, which I did ID.
[01:39:37.920 --> 01:39:44.920]  So I go to court and say I'm out there, and I'm just continuously getting arrested.
[01:39:44.920 --> 01:39:50.920]  So the main deal is I'm going to court Monday for failure to appear once again.
[01:39:50.920 --> 01:39:54.920]  And I challenge jurisdiction.
[01:39:54.920 --> 01:39:57.920]  I'm about to ask for fair notice.
[01:39:57.920 --> 01:40:09.920]  And I'm, you know, calling them out on their threatening form letter that keeps sending me these summonses because they don't fulfill the form.
[01:40:09.920 --> 01:40:15.920]  They're supposed to send me these summonses.
[01:40:15.920 --> 01:40:27.920]  So no matter what I try with these guys, they just, you know, they're running me around avoiding all procedure, which, of course, is what your show is all about.
[01:40:27.920 --> 01:40:35.920]  But really my main question was what statutes that you just directed me to.
[01:40:35.920 --> 01:40:44.920]  So 1517G, 1406C, and those were all criminal procedure.
[01:40:44.920 --> 01:40:45.920]  Yeah.
[01:40:45.920 --> 01:40:46.920]  Okay.
[01:40:46.920 --> 01:40:48.920]  Okay.
[01:40:48.920 --> 01:40:55.920]  Well, okay, now when they try to tell you that you haven't been put into a custodial arrest,
[01:40:55.920 --> 01:41:01.920]  then they cannot actually say that 3810 would apply as a failure to appear anyway.
[01:41:01.920 --> 01:41:11.920]  If you argue that you were never under arrest, well, 3810 specifically says a person lawfully released from custody with or without bail.
[01:41:11.920 --> 01:41:16.920]  Well, how can you be in custody if you were never arrested according to them?
[01:41:16.920 --> 01:41:17.920]  Right.
[01:41:17.920 --> 01:41:24.920]  Now, of course, the ZZV state says that you are in a custodial arrest, so we know that that presumption is false.
[01:41:24.920 --> 01:41:34.920]  Even though they assert it all the time to get you to produce information that they can use against you, they try to say that because we never actually arrested you,
[01:41:34.920 --> 01:41:38.920]  you have to comply with our demand to produce this information.
[01:41:38.920 --> 01:41:40.920]  No, you don't.
[01:41:40.920 --> 01:41:47.920]  Whether they arrest you or not, you can never be compelled to produce information they can use against you.
[01:41:47.920 --> 01:41:49.920]  Right.
[01:41:49.920 --> 01:41:54.920]  But in the case of these arrests, like what you're talking about on the failure to appear,
[01:41:54.920 --> 01:42:06.920]  15.17G omits a reference to the section dealing with Class C fine onlys and specifically references only those A and B offenses.
[01:42:06.920 --> 01:42:15.920]  Even though the transportation code said that it is an offense to failure to not comply, it doesn't say what the offense is.
[01:42:15.920 --> 01:42:19.920]  It doesn't actually define an offense.
[01:42:19.920 --> 01:42:27.920]  In 543, I think it's 010 of the transportation code.
[01:42:27.920 --> 01:42:31.920]  But it does define what a crime is, and that's not an offense or a violation.
[01:42:31.920 --> 01:42:33.920]  Not in the transportation code, it doesn't.
[01:42:33.920 --> 01:42:35.920]  Not in the transportation code, that's true.
[01:42:35.920 --> 01:42:38.920]  That's in government code.
[01:42:38.920 --> 01:42:46.920]  But penal code says that Cs are not arrestable.
[01:42:46.920 --> 01:42:48.920]  Well, that's correct.
[01:42:48.920 --> 01:42:54.920]  Well, Cs, it's not that they're not arrestable.
[01:42:54.920 --> 01:42:58.920]  It's that you can't be incarcerated for them.
[01:42:58.920 --> 01:43:00.920]  There's a difference.
[01:43:00.920 --> 01:43:03.920]  Well, there's a difference between fine only and...
[01:43:03.920 --> 01:43:04.920]  No, no, no, no.
[01:43:04.920 --> 01:43:06.920]  Don't change subjects.
[01:43:06.920 --> 01:43:15.920]  There is a difference between being arrested for something and being incarcerated for something.
[01:43:15.920 --> 01:43:18.920]  Okay, well, I'm talking about being arrested for something.
[01:43:18.920 --> 01:43:27.920]  They can arrest you for a Class C if the Class C is a breach of the peace and they don't have a warrant.
[01:43:27.920 --> 01:43:31.920]  They can arrest you for a Class C if they have a warrant.
[01:43:31.920 --> 01:43:38.920]  The question is when and where can they get one and do they ever use one when they make these arrests?
[01:43:38.920 --> 01:43:45.920]  And the answer is almost always no.
[01:43:45.920 --> 01:43:46.920]  You still with me?
[01:43:46.920 --> 01:43:47.920]  Yes, sir.
[01:43:47.920 --> 01:43:48.920]  Okay, hang on.
[01:43:48.920 --> 01:43:49.920]  We'll finish this up on the other side.
[01:43:49.920 --> 01:43:52.920]  512-646-1984, folks.
[01:43:52.920 --> 01:43:53.920]  Give us a call.
[01:43:53.920 --> 01:43:54.920]  I got one segment left.
[01:43:54.920 --> 01:43:59.920]  We will be right back.
[01:43:59.920 --> 01:44:02.920]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[01:44:02.920 --> 01:44:03.920]  Sorry.
[01:44:03.920 --> 01:44:06.920]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[01:44:06.920 --> 01:44:07.920]  What?
[01:44:07.920 --> 01:44:11.920]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[01:44:11.920 --> 01:44:18.920]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[01:44:18.920 --> 01:44:24.920]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[01:44:24.920 --> 01:44:29.920]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[01:44:29.920 --> 01:44:35.920]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other Foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover.
[01:44:35.920 --> 01:44:42.920]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[01:44:42.920 --> 01:44:53.920]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:44:53.920 --> 01:44:59.920]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[01:44:59.920 --> 01:45:03.920]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:03.920 --> 01:45:14.920]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.920 --> 01:45:18.920]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.920 --> 01:45:27.920]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself. Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[01:45:27.920 --> 01:45:33.920]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.920 --> 01:45:42.920]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.920 --> 01:45:51.920]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.920 --> 01:46:13.920]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:46:13.920 --> 01:46:25.920]  All right, folks, we are back. This is Rule of Law Radio.
[01:46:25.920 --> 01:46:29.920]  All right. Right now, we're talking to JP. JP, go ahead.
[01:46:29.920 --> 01:46:39.920]  All right. Well, how do you think I should approach this for this new judge about this failure to appear, which I did appear for, and they told me that I didn't appear.
[01:46:39.920 --> 01:46:46.920]  And his band of merry men thought the whole ordeal was as entertaining as could be.
[01:46:46.920 --> 01:46:50.920]  How do you think I should present this to this new judge and tell him that I was here?
[01:46:50.920 --> 01:46:52.920]  They arrested me because the judge...
[01:46:52.920 --> 01:46:55.920]  Well, whatever you present, you need to present in writing.
[01:46:55.920 --> 01:47:03.920]  You need to demand that the whole thing be declared, all the charges be dismissed because they were illegal on their face.
[01:47:03.920 --> 01:47:09.920]  But just do it as a motion to dismiss all the charges and to challenge the complaints.
[01:47:09.920 --> 01:47:13.920]  Okay. I have put in an affidavit on that.
[01:47:13.920 --> 01:47:22.920]  No, no, no. I didn't say anything about just an affidavit. Do a motion to dismiss and a motion to quash the complaints.
[01:47:22.920 --> 01:47:26.920]  Okay. I was planning on doing that, so I was hoping you'd say that.
[01:47:26.920 --> 01:47:27.920]  Okay.
[01:47:27.920 --> 01:47:28.920]  All right. Well, thank you very much, Eddie.
[01:47:28.920 --> 01:47:30.920]  You're welcome. Thanks for calling in.
[01:47:30.920 --> 01:47:31.920]  Yes, sir.
[01:47:31.920 --> 01:47:34.920]  All right, folks, I got about, oh, 11 minutes and I'm out of callers.
[01:47:34.920 --> 01:47:36.920]  I need some more up here.
[01:47:36.920 --> 01:47:41.920]  So it's 512-646-1984.
[01:47:41.920 --> 01:47:43.920]  Okay.
[01:47:43.920 --> 01:47:56.920]  Now, all things considered, when you listen to a lot of these stories about what's happening, who it's happening to, how it's being done, you can see that it's corrupt.
[01:47:56.920 --> 01:48:22.920]  But there's not always a pat answer on how to handle it because you're basically asking the system to provide you with the means to hold it accountable for what it does knowingly and intentionally in violation of all the other rules we've already put in place for it.
[01:48:22.920 --> 01:48:25.920]  Talk about an uphill battle.
[01:48:25.920 --> 01:48:31.920]  If they're not willing to listen to the rules in the first instance, why would they be willing to listen to it in the second?
[01:48:31.920 --> 01:48:34.920]  See the problem?
[01:48:34.920 --> 01:48:35.920]  They don't care.
[01:48:35.920 --> 01:48:40.920]  They believe they're invulnerable to accountability.
[01:48:40.920 --> 01:48:43.920]  And that is what we have to change.
[01:48:43.920 --> 01:48:51.920]  Because as long as they feel like they can get away with doing what they want, they will get away with doing what they want.
[01:48:51.920 --> 01:48:55.920]  And nothing you or I say or do is going to change that.
[01:48:55.920 --> 01:48:56.920]  Why?
[01:48:56.920 --> 01:49:04.920]  Because you and I alone have no power to resist their collective use of force against us.
[01:49:04.920 --> 01:49:31.920]  I mean, consider what that actually means. We put government in place for the specific and sole purpose of exercising collective force on behalf of the individual in order to protect individual rights and property against unlawful uses of force against those persons or property.
[01:49:31.920 --> 01:49:52.920]  Then, as time goes by, the very force we put in place to prevent such abuse does itself become the one doing the abusing by doing the very thing that we organized and gave it power to act to prevent.
[01:49:52.920 --> 01:49:57.920]  We have come full circle.
[01:49:57.920 --> 01:50:03.920]  It's a reverse circle.
[01:50:03.920 --> 01:50:06.920]  It's just it's ridiculous.
[01:50:06.920 --> 01:50:20.920]  We have gone all the way from here's the only lawful power you have protect individual rights to here's the only power you don't have.
[01:50:20.920 --> 01:50:27.920]  Okay, murdering me without making it look justifiable.
[01:50:27.920 --> 01:50:32.920]  And believe me, people, that's where we are.
[01:50:32.920 --> 01:50:41.920]  You're not going in in to any court before any of these judges in the hopes of seeking justice.
[01:50:41.920 --> 01:50:44.920]  You think you are.
[01:50:44.920 --> 01:50:47.920]  But that's just a dream.
[01:50:47.920 --> 01:50:55.920]  You're not going in there to accomplish anything that those people themselves don't wish you to accomplish.
[01:50:55.920 --> 01:50:57.920]  Because you won't.
[01:50:57.920 --> 01:51:05.920]  Doesn't matter how many of our rules that you put in their face to say, Look, you have to do this.
[01:51:05.920 --> 01:51:08.920]  When that actor can sit there and go, No, I don't.
[01:51:08.920 --> 01:51:10.920]  I don't care what it says, I can do what I want to.
[01:51:10.920 --> 01:51:14.920]  Why? Because the guy with the gun in the corner is on my side.
[01:51:14.920 --> 01:51:16.920]  And you don't have one.
[01:51:16.920 --> 01:51:24.920]  And you don't have enough people in this courtroom to stand up behind you that have one.
[01:51:24.920 --> 01:51:36.920]  And for every person you bring in here, then I can bring in at least one more to account for each of those you bring in and all of my guys will have guns and your guys won't.
[01:51:36.920 --> 01:51:44.920]  And then if you guys decide that you are going to come in here with guns, well, I'll just call all of them to come down here and declare this place a riot.
[01:51:44.920 --> 01:51:52.920]  And of course, if an even bigger crowd of you comes down here to hold me accountable, well, then we'll call in the governor with the National Guard.
[01:51:52.920 --> 01:52:06.920]  And then if that doesn't work, we'll call in the entire guard units from all those surrounding states or the federal armed forces to come in and help us put you down.
[01:52:06.920 --> 01:52:17.920]  It doesn't matter to me that the only thing you were doing was trying to hold me to my oath of office, to hold me to my lawful duty, and to hold me accountable for failing to do that lawful duty.
[01:52:17.920 --> 01:52:19.920]  That's all irrelevant.
[01:52:19.920 --> 01:52:29.920]  I'm the one that sits on the throne up here, and you are just the peons that have to appear before me and accept my judgment and decree.
[01:52:29.920 --> 01:52:34.920]  If you don't think every judge thinks that way, then ask them.
[01:52:34.920 --> 01:52:36.920]  Judge, I object.
[01:52:36.920 --> 01:52:36.920]  Too bad.
[01:52:36.920 --> 01:52:37.920]  Sit down, shut up.
[01:52:37.920 --> 01:52:39.920]  You're overruled.
[01:52:39.920 --> 01:52:41.920]  That's the king getting his way.
[01:52:41.920 --> 01:52:46.920]  Judge, the law clearly states that you cannot do this unless this has been done.
[01:52:46.920 --> 01:52:53.920]  Well, I'm going to say that law is not properly written in that form, and so we're going to decide it works this way instead.
[01:52:53.920 --> 01:52:59.920]  That's the king and his decree.
[01:52:59.920 --> 01:53:08.920]  We are way, way overdue for watering the Tree of Liberty, folks.
[01:53:08.920 --> 01:53:13.920]  Way, way overdue.
[01:53:13.920 --> 01:53:17.920]  And it is withering where it stands.
[01:53:17.920 --> 01:53:20.920]  No question.
[01:53:20.920 --> 01:53:23.920]  Okay, all of a sudden I got a board full of people.
[01:53:23.920 --> 01:53:28.920]  I don't even think my call screeners had a chance to get to all these folks yet, but they all came up.
[01:53:28.920 --> 01:53:38.920]  So I'm going to give him just a second to catch me at least one that I can deal with here, and then we'll start taking these other calls in the last few minutes we got left.
[01:53:38.920 --> 01:53:41.920]  But understand something.
[01:53:41.920 --> 01:53:44.920]  The system doesn't care about you.
[01:53:44.920 --> 01:53:46.920]  It doesn't care about me.
[01:53:46.920 --> 01:53:48.920]  It doesn't care about right and wrong.
[01:53:48.920 --> 01:53:50.920]  It cares about its power.
[01:53:50.920 --> 01:53:53.920]  It cares about its wealth.
[01:53:53.920 --> 01:54:02.920]  And it cares about how much of that it can keep and use at all times.
[01:54:02.920 --> 01:54:08.920]  You and I are just a cog in the wheel of making that happen as far as the system is concerned.
[01:54:08.920 --> 01:54:14.920]  And again, that needs to change.
[01:54:14.920 --> 01:54:18.920]  So if that doesn't change, where do we go?
[01:54:18.920 --> 01:54:21.920]  What do we do?
[01:54:21.920 --> 01:54:25.920]  That's up to us to figure out and do something about.
[01:54:25.920 --> 01:54:26.920]  All right.
[01:54:26.920 --> 01:54:28.920]  I'm going to go ahead and take Alex in Texas.
[01:54:28.920 --> 01:54:30.920]  Alex, what can I do for you?
[01:54:30.920 --> 01:54:31.920]  Oh, hi, Eddie.
[01:54:31.920 --> 01:54:32.920]  How are you doing?
[01:54:32.920 --> 01:54:35.920]  I just have a quick question.
[01:54:35.920 --> 01:54:44.920]  I purchased this RV from the dealer, and they had promised me that it had a – or they had said it had a brand new roof installed.
[01:54:44.920 --> 01:54:46.920]  Well, I take it home.
[01:54:46.920 --> 01:54:48.920]  I have nothing but trouble with it.
[01:54:48.920 --> 01:54:51.920]  I have a professional –
[01:54:51.920 --> 01:54:52.920]  Trouble relating to the roof?
[01:54:52.920 --> 01:54:53.920]  Yes.
[01:54:53.920 --> 01:54:57.920]  And long story short, the roof was not sealed properly.
[01:54:57.920 --> 01:55:01.920]  They – underneath the roof, they would have – they didn't take off the old roof.
[01:55:01.920 --> 01:55:06.920]  It was just a shoddy job they did, you know, on that roof.
[01:55:06.920 --> 01:55:09.920]  Is there any – I mean, since it was –
[01:55:09.920 --> 01:55:10.920]  Well, of course.
[01:55:10.920 --> 01:55:11.920]  That's fraud.
[01:55:11.920 --> 01:55:17.920]  If they told you it had a properly installed new roof on it and it didn't, that's fraud.
[01:55:17.920 --> 01:55:18.920]  Okay.
[01:55:18.920 --> 01:55:20.920]  So how can I pursue this?
[01:55:20.920 --> 01:55:27.920]  You can get a written – you can get a written report by the people that you hired to check it out, okay,
[01:55:27.920 --> 01:55:32.920]  which you should have done before you purchased it, once you knew that this was the issue,
[01:55:32.920 --> 01:55:39.920]  because that's just going to make your fight harder to not have done it, but still.
[01:55:39.920 --> 01:55:44.920]  Does the documents from the original sale state that it included a new roof?
[01:55:44.920 --> 01:55:52.920]  You know, I got to go check those out, because I – it might not have not said that it had a new roof.
[01:55:52.920 --> 01:55:53.920]  Okay.
[01:55:53.920 --> 01:55:54.920]  Well, here's the thing.
[01:55:54.920 --> 01:55:59.920]  If you – anytime you're getting a representation about a piece of merchandise,
[01:55:59.920 --> 01:56:02.920]  you want that representation in writing.
[01:56:02.920 --> 01:56:03.920]  Okay.
[01:56:03.920 --> 01:56:04.920]  Period.
[01:56:04.920 --> 01:56:07.920]  All right.
[01:56:07.920 --> 01:56:14.920]  If you fail to do that, then making the claim, well, he said, she said, is going to be impossible to prove,
[01:56:14.920 --> 01:56:21.920]  when they're saying they didn't and you're saying they did, unless your witnesses are more believable than theirs.
[01:56:21.920 --> 01:56:22.920]  Okay.
[01:56:22.920 --> 01:56:26.920]  What about the fact that they promised a whole bunch of other lists of things that they –
[01:56:26.920 --> 01:56:28.920]  Did they write them down?
[01:56:28.920 --> 01:56:31.920]  Those they did and they didn't deliver.
[01:56:31.920 --> 01:56:39.920]  Well, then you have a – you have a breach of contract dispute in that instance, which is different than fraud.
[01:56:39.920 --> 01:56:42.920]  The fraud would be a kick in the teeth.
[01:56:42.920 --> 01:56:44.920]  Okay?
[01:56:44.920 --> 01:56:48.920]  The breach is a slap on the wrist.
[01:56:48.920 --> 01:56:51.920]  Okay.
[01:56:51.920 --> 01:56:52.920]  All right.
[01:56:52.920 --> 01:56:58.920]  I guess let me figure out – through all my documents, make sure they – what they did and didn't include in writing.
[01:56:58.920 --> 01:57:00.920]  That would be a good start.
[01:57:00.920 --> 01:57:01.920]  Okay.
[01:57:01.920 --> 01:57:02.920]  Thank you.
[01:57:02.920 --> 01:57:03.920]  Okay.
[01:57:03.920 --> 01:57:04.920]  You're welcome.
[01:57:04.920 --> 01:57:05.920]  All right.
[01:57:05.920 --> 01:57:08.920]  Now we're going to go to Chris in Texas.
[01:57:08.920 --> 01:57:11.920]  Chris, we got about a minute and a half.
[01:57:11.920 --> 01:57:12.920]  What do you got?
[01:57:12.920 --> 01:57:20.920]  Eddie, I was just going in to tell you how awesome I think you are and how great it is to have somebody like you out there doing things for people like this.
[01:57:20.920 --> 01:57:23.920]  I'm an ex-Navy SEAL.
[01:57:23.920 --> 01:57:27.920]  When I came back to Texas, just my background caused me to get in trouble.
[01:57:27.920 --> 01:57:32.920]  And if I did something, if I laid my hands on somebody that was trying to harm me, I got in trouble.
[01:57:32.920 --> 01:57:39.920]  When I got in trouble, I paid $20,000 for a defense attorney.
[01:57:39.920 --> 01:57:43.920]  My defense attorney was a former assistant district attorney.
[01:57:43.920 --> 01:57:47.920]  Just imagine the railroading that I had to deal with there.
[01:57:47.920 --> 01:57:48.920]  Oh, yeah.
[01:57:48.920 --> 01:57:49.920]  I'm sure.
[01:57:49.920 --> 01:57:50.920]  And they always try to sell it.
[01:57:50.920 --> 01:57:51.920]  Well, I'm a former DA.
[01:57:51.920 --> 01:57:53.920]  I can do this and this and this.
[01:57:53.920 --> 01:57:54.920]  I know the system.
[01:57:54.920 --> 01:57:55.920]  You're right.
[01:57:55.920 --> 01:57:59.920]  I do know the system and exactly how to play it against you and me.
[01:57:59.920 --> 01:58:00.920]  Yeah.
[01:58:00.920 --> 01:58:01.920]  It's just ridiculous.
[01:58:01.920 --> 01:58:03.920]  I just want to tell you how awesome you are.
[01:58:03.920 --> 01:58:06.920]  Well, I appreciate the call-in and the kudos.
[01:58:06.920 --> 01:58:07.920]  I really do.
[01:58:07.920 --> 01:58:13.920]  And since you're in this area, Coach, if you close by, you may want to come down and take a gander at some of the classes on Sunday.
[01:58:13.920 --> 01:58:14.920]  Okay.
[01:58:14.920 --> 01:58:15.920]  Yeah, that would be awesome.
[01:58:15.920 --> 01:58:16.920]  All right.
[01:58:16.920 --> 01:58:17.920]  All right.
[01:58:17.920 --> 01:58:18.920]  Thank you, Coach.
[01:58:18.920 --> 01:58:19.920]  All right.
[01:58:19.920 --> 01:58:20.920]  Thanks for calling in, Chris.
[01:58:20.920 --> 01:58:21.920]  Greatly appreciated.
[01:58:21.920 --> 01:58:22.920]  All right, folks.
[01:58:22.920 --> 01:58:24.920]  This has been the Monday Night Rule of Law Radio Traffic Show.
[01:58:24.920 --> 01:58:25.920]  Thank you all that have listened.
[01:58:25.920 --> 01:58:27.920]  Thank you all that have called in.
[01:58:27.920 --> 01:58:30.920]  Thank you for the kind words of support.
[01:58:30.920 --> 01:58:34.920]  We also ask that you please remember to financially support the network and to make donations,
[01:58:34.920 --> 01:58:40.920]  because that's how we're making our living for the most part, for what, if you can call it a living.
[01:58:40.920 --> 01:58:42.920]  But somebody's got to do it.
[01:58:42.920 --> 01:58:43.920]  All right, folks.
[01:58:43.920 --> 01:58:44.920]  I want to thank you all.
[01:58:44.920 --> 01:58:45.920]  You all have a blessed week.
[01:58:45.920 --> 01:58:49.920]  Good night and God bless.
[01:58:49.920 --> 01:58:57.920]  Bibles for America is offering absolutely free a unique study Bible called the New Testament Recovery Version.
[01:58:57.920 --> 01:59:03.920]  The New Testament Recovery Version has over 9,000 footnotes that explain what the Bible says verse by verse,
[01:59:03.920 --> 01:59:07.920]  helping you to know God and to know the meaning of life.
[01:59:07.920 --> 01:59:10.920]  Order your free copy today from Bibles for America.
[01:59:10.920 --> 01:59:19.920]  Call us toll free at 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:19.920 --> 01:59:25.920]  This translation is highly accurate and it comes with over 13,000 cross references,
[01:59:25.920 --> 01:59:29.920]  plus charts and maps and an outline for every book of the Bible.
[01:59:29.920 --> 01:59:31.920]  This is truly a Bible you can understand.
[01:59:31.920 --> 01:59:40.920]  To get your free copy of the New Testament Recovery Version, call us toll free at 888-551-0102.
[01:59:40.920 --> 01:59:49.920]  That's 888-551-0102 or visit us online at bfa.org.
[01:59:49.920 --> 01:59:52.920]  Looking for some truth?
[01:59:52.920 --> 01:59:53.920]  You found it.
[01:59:53.920 --> 02:00:01.920]  Logosradionetwork.com