[00:00.000 --> 00:11.080]  JPMorgan Chase and HSBC were hit with two lawsuits Wednesday by investors who accused
[00:11.080 --> 00:16.000]  them of conspiring to drive down silver prices and reaping hundreds of millions of dollars
[00:16.000 --> 00:21.000]  in illegal profits. The banks, among the world's largest, were accused of manipulating the
[00:21.000 --> 00:26.600]  market for COMEX, silver futures and options. The two plaintiffs each said they lost money
[00:26.600 --> 00:33.120]  because of the alleged manipulation. UN officials are investigating whether a sewage spill was
[00:33.120 --> 00:38.040]  responsible for an outbreak of cholera in Haiti that has claimed the lives of over 300
[00:38.040 --> 00:43.200]  people. UN investigators collected samples Wednesday from a sewage spill leaking behind
[00:43.200 --> 00:48.320]  a Nepalese peacekeeping base which potentially infected a river system at the source of the
[00:48.320 --> 00:56.000]  outbreak. The strand of cholera in Haiti matches a strand common in Nepal. The UK Guardian
[00:56.000 --> 01:01.480]  reports it has asked the British government to declassify Afghanistan war documents in
[01:01.480 --> 01:06.280]  accordance with the Freedom of Information law that contain information about the killing
[01:06.280 --> 01:11.960]  of Afghan civilians by British forces. The documents show some 21 incidents where Afghan
[01:11.960 --> 01:18.520]  civilians were killed, among them children and the mentally handicapped. A special Inspector
[01:18.520 --> 01:23.920]  General for Afghanistan Reconstructions audit Wednesday showed the US was unable to account
[01:23.920 --> 01:31.560]  for $18 billion in contracts for Afghanistan awarded since 2007. SIGAR is mandated by Congress
[01:31.560 --> 01:36.600]  to look at all US government agencies to examine how reconstruction money is being spent in
[01:36.600 --> 01:44.080]  Afghanistan. The years prior to 2007, during which time the US spent $37 billion on reconstruction,
[01:44.080 --> 01:49.680]  could not be audited due to lack of proper record keeping. To this day, no central database
[01:49.680 --> 01:54.960]  exists to track contracts. There are four contracting organizations within the Department
[01:54.960 --> 02:00.000]  of Defense alone and they do not coordinate and share information. The audit also showed
[02:00.000 --> 02:04.800]  the US awarded lucrative contracts to firms which failed to fulfill them and were not
[02:04.800 --> 02:09.480]  held accountable until after they were paid. Critics said a large portion of the missing
[02:09.480 --> 02:17.000]  billions likely went toward bribes. US drones fired two missiles in the Pakistani tribal
[02:17.000 --> 02:22.400]  region of North Waziristan Thursday, killing seven alleged militants. It was the third
[02:22.400 --> 02:27.600]  attack there in the past 24 hours. The region is home to hundreds of Pakistan and foreign
[02:27.600 --> 02:33.360]  militants, many belonging to or allied with Al Qaeda and the Taliban. It is also the base
[02:33.360 --> 02:38.560]  of a powerful insurgent group, US officials say is behind many attacks just across the
[02:38.560 --> 02:43.120]  border in Afghanistan. There have been at least 20 US missile strikes in Pakistan's
[02:43.120 --> 02:48.400]  tribal regions this month. The Pakistani army is widely believed to provide intelligence
[02:48.400 --> 02:53.640]  for drone attacks and allows drones to take off from a base in Pakistan. Human rights
[02:53.640 --> 02:57.760]  groups have called US drone attacks, quote, extrajudicial killings.
[02:57.760 --> 03:01.760]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[03:01.760 --> 03:10.760]  You are listening to the Rule of Law Radio Network at ruleoflawradio.com, live free speech
[03:10.760 --> 03:17.760]  talk radio at its best.
[03:40.760 --> 03:50.760]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? Bad boys,
[03:50.760 --> 03:56.760]  bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when they come for you? When you were eight
[03:56.760 --> 04:01.760]  and you had bad traits, you'd go to school and learn the golden rule. So why are you
[04:01.760 --> 04:07.760]  acting like a bloody fool? If you get high and you must get cool. Bad boys, bad boys,
[04:07.760 --> 04:12.760]  whatcha gonna do? All right, bad boys, bad boys, what are you gonna do when we come for
[04:12.760 --> 04:25.760]  you? Tonight is Thursday, October 28, 2010. This is the Rule of Law Radio Show on ruleoflawradio.com.
[04:25.760 --> 04:30.760]  And I just wanted to make an announcement about concerning elections. This coming Tuesday
[04:30.760 --> 04:35.560]  night Tom Cotty will be doing live election coverage here on Rule of Law Radio Network.
[04:35.560 --> 04:41.960]  This show is at 6 p.m. Central Time Tuesdays and Thursdays and have not participated in
[04:41.960 --> 04:49.360]  early voting yet here in Travis County. However, for those of you who have not voted yet, what
[04:49.360 --> 04:54.760]  I'm going to do for y'all, well, let me just back up. We gotta get the incumbents out,
[04:54.760 --> 05:01.720]  okay? Number one, we have to get the incumbents out. Now, I have found every election sometimes
[05:01.720 --> 05:07.560]  it can be a difficult task to determine just who the incumbents are. I mean, yes, you know,
[05:07.560 --> 05:11.480]  the biggies, it's pretty obvious, the governor, you know, lieutenant governor, who your state
[05:11.480 --> 05:15.960]  rep is and who your state senator is and stuff like that. But there's always a lot of other
[05:15.960 --> 05:21.560]  places, these county commissioners or, you know, railroad commissioners and all these
[05:21.560 --> 05:27.440]  justices of the peace and different judges and different places of the county commissioner's
[05:27.440 --> 05:32.320]  court and all these things. It's sometimes not so obvious who the incumbents are. I may
[05:32.320 --> 05:38.280]  not have ever heard of these people. Well, they don't make it real easy on you to find
[05:38.280 --> 05:43.200]  out who the incumbents are. I mean, you can go to some of the, you can Google or not Google
[05:43.200 --> 05:48.520]  but, you know, Ixquick, some of these people's names that are on the ballot and even on their
[05:48.520 --> 05:55.080]  websites the incumbents are hesitant to let you know that they are incumbents because they
[05:55.080 --> 06:01.000]  know that the populace is angry and wants all the incumbents out. So I have done the
[06:01.000 --> 06:08.680]  research for you, took me about an hour or so and I went through everyone on all the
[06:08.680 --> 06:15.240]  different places on the ballot here in Travis County except for your state reps. I'm going
[06:15.240 --> 06:21.520]  to assume that folks know who their state rep is or who their state senator is. I mean,
[06:21.520 --> 06:25.800]  obviously here in Austin District 14 it's Kirk Watson. You know we're going to be wanting
[06:25.800 --> 06:32.000]  to get him out. So later this evening or tomorrow I will post on the Rule of Law Radio website
[06:32.000 --> 06:37.560]  all the places and who the incumbents are so you can vote against them people and what
[06:37.560 --> 06:43.360]  I recommend, I kind of go along with Richard Reza's strategy, we would love to put in our
[06:43.360 --> 06:48.920]  own people. We would love to put in these libertarian candidates but unfortunately right
[06:48.920 --> 06:55.240]  now a vote for these third party candidates basically is just a vote for the incumbents.
[06:55.240 --> 07:01.120]  We're just not strong enough yet to put in our own people. So in races where there's
[07:01.120 --> 07:07.320]  a democrat and a republican and a libertarian, if the democrat is the incumbent, I'm voting
[07:07.320 --> 07:11.280]  for the republican. If the republican is the incumbent, I'm voting for the democrat. I'm
[07:11.280 --> 07:16.160]  going to vote for the strongest candidate that I believe has a chance to get the incumbent
[07:16.160 --> 07:21.960]  out. First things first, we have to get out the incumbents. And now a lot of these races,
[07:21.960 --> 07:26.800]  it will be the incumbent and there will be no other main candidate, I mean main party
[07:26.800 --> 07:31.460]  candidate. The incumbent will be like a democrat and then there will be a libertarian running
[07:31.460 --> 07:34.560]  against them. Well obviously in those cases we're going to vote the libertarian. I would
[07:34.560 --> 07:40.040]  love to vote just straight libertarian ticket but again unfortunately is my opinion as well
[07:40.040 --> 07:45.440]  as Richard Reeves from Outside the Box Politics that a vote in these particular situations
[07:45.440 --> 07:49.080]  a vote for the third party candidate is just, you're basically, you may as well just vote
[07:49.080 --> 07:56.440]  for the incumbent. Can I make a comment? Yes. I was in North Carolina, a primary election,
[07:56.440 --> 08:02.920]  two incumbents in the primary. It was clear the only way they made it to the primary is
[08:02.920 --> 08:07.920]  so many people ran against them, they split the vote against the incumbent. Exactly. They
[08:07.920 --> 08:12.800]  got creamed in the primary. That's why Rick Perry is still in the governorship and I still
[08:12.800 --> 08:21.560]  have misgivings about Strayhorn. I'm wondering if she was put in there as some kind of a
[08:21.560 --> 08:28.320]  wild card to draw votes away from the democratic candidate last time, last election in order
[08:28.320 --> 08:35.400]  to keep Rick Perry in. So I'm not getting fooled again this time, all right? I am not
[08:35.400 --> 08:40.720]  a democrat but I'll tell you what, I am doing, I am voting strategically this time to get
[08:40.720 --> 08:45.120]  Rick Perry out. I mean as Richard Reeves said on his show the other day, he's like, you
[08:45.120 --> 08:48.560]  know, how long has this guy been in there and how much damage has he done? I mean, may
[08:48.560 --> 08:52.400]  as well start calling him King Perry. I mean, give him a scepter, give him a crown. What
[08:52.400 --> 08:57.600]  the heck? We got to get this guy out of here, no matter what. So anyway, I'm going to put
[08:57.600 --> 09:03.600]  the list of the incumbents on the website, like I said, either later tonight, maybe tomorrow
[09:03.600 --> 09:09.400]  for folks who haven't voted yet. I'm going to do that for all the places except for your
[09:09.400 --> 09:15.680]  state rep and your U.S. House rep, okay? I don't have time to do all that research. I'm
[09:15.680 --> 09:21.800]  going to assume that you know who your state senator is and who your state rep is and who
[09:21.800 --> 09:27.840]  your U.S. rep is, okay? Especially we've got to get Lloyd Doggett out of there. So that's
[09:27.840 --> 09:32.880]  one announcement I was going to make for you folks. Also another announcement, speaking
[09:32.880 --> 09:39.520]  of Richard Reeves, this coming Wednesday is going to be Richard Reeves' last show. He
[09:39.520 --> 09:44.080]  is hanging up the mic for a while. He's not doing his cable access show anymore. He just
[09:44.080 --> 09:49.000]  doesn't have time. He's got too much activist work and too much family responsibilities
[09:49.000 --> 09:53.240]  right now to continue his show. That is highly unfortunate. We love Richard Reeves. He's
[09:53.240 --> 09:58.920]  been a close, dear friend of mine for many years and I sure will miss hearing him on
[09:58.920 --> 10:04.640]  the radio. However, the good news, so it's bittersweet news there. We have to say goodbye
[10:04.640 --> 10:10.960]  to Richard Reeves but he is welcome to come back any time. But in his place, we're bringing
[10:10.960 --> 10:17.120]  on Matt Medina and Cody Hess from We Are Change San Antonio. Their radio show is going to
[10:17.120 --> 10:22.520]  be called Truth Exposed Radio with We Are Change San Antonio. We're looking forward
[10:22.520 --> 10:27.920]  to bringing them on. I've known Matt for, well, almost a year now, maybe a little over
[10:27.920 --> 10:34.280]  six, nine months. I started working with Matt back in last February, I believe it was, January,
[10:34.280 --> 10:40.720]  February when we were organizing the Architects for Engineers conference here in Austin, Texas.
[10:40.720 --> 10:47.240]  So Matt is a great guy and he's been on the show several times. He's been taking it to
[10:47.240 --> 10:52.600]  the man in the courts, beating these tickets in San Antonio about signs and handing out
[10:52.600 --> 10:56.920]  flyers and stuff like that. So he's a true fighter and we're looking forward to having
[10:56.920 --> 11:03.680]  him on as well. Now, the other issue I wanted to address concerning emails to Randy and
[11:03.680 --> 11:11.040]  myself and some people that seem a little disgruntled that we're not answering their
[11:11.040 --> 11:18.520]  emails. Folks, listen, Randy and I get several hundred emails a day, several hundred. Randy
[11:18.520 --> 11:24.360]  probably gets over a thousand emails a day. Okay, we just can't answer all your emails.
[11:24.360 --> 11:29.960]  And a lot of these emails, people are writing and it's good. You're writing narratives,
[11:29.960 --> 11:36.360]  very detailed stories and you're wanting our help off the air for your situation. And folks,
[11:36.360 --> 11:43.360]  we just can't do that. Okay, Randy is busy 24-7 just about. He barely has time to sleep
[11:43.360 --> 11:49.600]  dealing with his mortgage business now. He's got people that are, their wives are in the
[11:49.600 --> 11:54.880]  hospital dying and they're losing their homes and getting kicked out on the street by the
[11:54.880 --> 12:01.600]  sheriff tomorrow. I mean, we just don't have time to help you folks with your legal situations
[12:01.600 --> 12:08.840]  off the air. That's why we do a radio show. Okay, so we may be able to answer some of
[12:08.840 --> 12:13.200]  your emails. We may not. I mean, it's gotten to the point where I just about can't deal
[12:13.200 --> 12:18.320]  with emails anymore unless it's business related to the network and it's a solicited email.
[12:18.320 --> 12:22.280]  We will do everything we can. We're doing this to help you folks, but please don't be
[12:22.280 --> 12:27.600]  offended and please don't be angry if we're not answering your emails and helping you
[12:27.600 --> 12:33.840]  off the air with your thing. Okay, that's why we do a radio show. So I entreat everyone,
[12:33.840 --> 12:39.200]  if you have legal issues that you've written to us about on emails and we have not responded,
[12:39.200 --> 12:46.360]  call in to the show. That's why we do a radio show. We have a lot of this time to help you.
[12:46.360 --> 12:53.280]  Okay, we do a four hour show on Friday nights, eight to midnight. Okay, I've given up doing
[12:53.280 --> 12:58.920]  gigs with my bands. All right, we don't do hardly any gigs anymore, especially not on
[12:58.920 --> 13:05.280]  Friday nights. I'm cutting into my musical career here for you guys. Randy has cut into
[13:05.280 --> 13:11.420]  everything for you guys. So has Eddie. We're paying for all of this out of our own pocket.
[13:11.420 --> 13:16.560]  We've allotted a certain amount of time every week to help you folks and it's called the
[13:16.560 --> 13:21.520]  radio show. All right, so we've got Monday nights, eight to ten central. We've got Thursday
[13:21.520 --> 13:26.920]  nights, eight to ten central. We've got four hour info marathon, Friday nights, eight to
[13:26.920 --> 13:33.040]  midnight central. That's four or five, six, that's eight hours a week that we have on
[13:33.040 --> 13:37.360]  the radio to help you folks. Now I realize a lot of people, they don't want to talk about
[13:37.360 --> 13:40.880]  their situation on the air because they feel it's personal and this and that. Just make
[13:40.880 --> 13:48.240]  up a name, folks. Okay, just say I'm Joe Blow from Indonesia or something. I mean it really
[13:48.240 --> 13:52.520]  doesn't matter but the point that I'm trying to make here is that we really, really want
[13:52.520 --> 13:56.400]  to help people but we just really, really don't have the time to do it off the air.
[13:56.400 --> 14:02.600]  So please call into the show. A lot of times we won't have any callers for like an hour
[14:02.600 --> 14:09.160]  and then the call board stacks up with like 25 callers in the last half hour of the show.
[14:09.160 --> 14:15.480]  What are we supposed to do with that? Okay, so call in and call in early. All right, so
[14:15.480 --> 14:20.880]  that's my little entreaty for you guys here. I mean if we didn't care about you all, we
[14:20.880 --> 14:25.360]  wouldn't be doing this but we need to help you on the air. Okay, we can't, we just do
[14:25.360 --> 14:34.240]  not have time to do it off the air. So okay, Randy, any comments?
[14:34.240 --> 14:41.080]  That is a problem and we do want to respond to everybody's difficulty and I hope you realize
[14:41.080 --> 14:49.580]  that I get emails that rip my heart out. I had someone call me today and ask me for help
[14:49.580 --> 14:56.120]  that he's going to get thrown out. They're going to do a foreclosure sale Tuesday. He
[14:56.120 --> 15:02.800]  said I haven't taken care of business like I should have but my wife has congestive heart
[15:02.800 --> 15:11.880]  failure and I never know if she's going to live through the next day. Geez, I hate this
[15:11.880 --> 15:16.180]  but this is what we have to deal with. This is what's happening and when somebody sends
[15:16.180 --> 15:25.800]  me an email and wants me to help them with a ticket or help them with a DUI, I look at
[15:25.800 --> 15:33.320]  that and I say I've got to set some priorities here. Who am I going to help? And frankly
[15:33.320 --> 15:41.920]  I'm getting so many that I can't help everybody no matter what. So we do have to set priorities.
[15:41.920 --> 15:45.960]  And if I responded to all the emails of people asking me to help them, there wouldn't be
[15:45.960 --> 15:51.840]  a radio network. Okay, I produce radio shows like four, six hours a day on top of everything
[15:51.840 --> 15:59.280]  else. We don't mean to apologize but we have to apologize. We can't do all of it and sure
[15:59.280 --> 16:05.120]  or not, we certainly don't mean to chastise our listeners for contacting us. That is not
[16:05.120 --> 16:12.320]  it at all. We just hope that you understand the position we find ourselves in. And help
[16:12.320 --> 16:19.200]  us. Help us keep up the struggle. Help us folks. We really do need help. Help us by
[16:19.200 --> 16:23.740]  calling in and asking us questions on the show instead of asking us questions on emails.
[16:23.740 --> 16:27.840]  That will help us. Donations will help us. And another great way that you can help us
[16:27.840 --> 16:32.320]  folks is all our listeners that are listening to us right now, to this show, why don't you
[16:32.320 --> 16:37.040]  tune in and listen to some of the other shows on this great network. You know, even if you're,
[16:37.040 --> 16:42.560]  even if you don't have time, just tune in to the stream and turn the volume off if you
[16:42.560 --> 16:46.920]  have to deal with your kids. Just so that we can get our stream numbers up. Give me
[16:46.920 --> 16:54.520]  a second. I got a phone to pick. Okay. My beer fund is dry. Your fund is dry too. Okay.
[16:54.520 --> 16:58.240]  We are going to break. Folks, please tune in to all the great shows on this network.
[16:58.240 --> 17:05.800]  We'll be right back. Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious
[17:05.800 --> 17:11.840]  metals and coin supplies in the Austin metro area. We also ship worldwide. We are a family
[17:11.840 --> 17:16.840]  owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin and metals purchases.
[17:16.840 --> 17:22.040]  We buy, sell, trade and consign rare coins, gold and silver coin collections, precious
[17:22.040 --> 17:27.760]  metals and scrap gold. We will purchase and sell gold and jewelry items as well. We offer
[17:27.760 --> 17:34.600]  daily specials on coins and bullion. We're located at 5448 Burnett Road Suite 3 and we're
[17:34.600 --> 17:40.520]  open Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturdays, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. You are welcome
[17:40.520 --> 17:48.800]  to stop in our shop during regular business hours or call 512-646-6440 with any questions.
[17:48.800 --> 17:54.040]  Ask for Chad and say you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or 90.1 FM. That's Capital
[17:54.040 --> 18:03.480]  Coin and Bullion, 512-646-6440. Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls,
[18:03.480 --> 18:09.320]  letters or even lawsuits? Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[18:09.320 --> 18:13.640]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you
[18:13.640 --> 18:19.040]  can win two. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using
[18:19.040 --> 18:24.800]  federal civil rights statutes, what to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons,
[18:24.800 --> 18:28.720]  how to answer letters and phone calls, how to get debt collectors out of your credit
[18:28.720 --> 18:34.080]  report, how to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away. The
[18:34.080 --> 18:39.200]  Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors. Personal
[18:39.200 --> 18:44.600]  consultation is available as well. For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[18:44.600 --> 18:50.000]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com. That's
[18:50.000 --> 18:59.400]  ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors
[18:59.400 --> 19:06.400]  now.
[19:06.400 --> 19:24.320]  Okay, folks. We are back and we're going to hear from Randy and his story. He's going
[19:24.320 --> 19:28.400]  to tell about something that happened to him earlier this week. But first, I just wanted
[19:28.400 --> 19:34.720]  to plug again, folks, even if you're listening to us right now on one of our AM or FM affiliates
[19:34.720 --> 19:40.200]  around the country, when you can, if you can, if you're at home or whatever, tune in to
[19:40.200 --> 19:45.920]  the stream. We need people to go to ruleoflawradio.com and click on that stream. Click on the button
[19:45.920 --> 19:50.620]  to pull the stream on your computer so that we can get our numbers up on Shoutcast. If
[19:50.620 --> 19:56.840]  you can't give us a dime, that would help us a lot. We need to get our stream numbers
[19:56.840 --> 20:03.280]  up on Shoutcast so that I can start advertising and marketing and promoting this network so
[20:03.280 --> 20:08.120]  we can get more affiliates and get the word out to more people so we can help more people
[20:08.120 --> 20:12.400]  so we can get sponsors. But we have to get those stream numbers up and not just on our
[20:12.400 --> 20:18.080]  show but the other shows as well. So folks that enjoy the show, please listen to the
[20:18.080 --> 20:22.260]  other shows on the network. And if you're busy at those times or you have to deal with
[20:22.260 --> 20:28.000]  your kids or whatever and you can't listen, just tune in to the stream anyway and just
[20:28.000 --> 20:34.000]  be pulling it from your computer. That will help us tremendously. Pulling the streams,
[20:34.000 --> 20:39.640]  that is the best way that folks can help us is to go to ruleoflawradio.com and pull that
[20:39.640 --> 20:45.000]  stream whenever I have, whenever I'm producing live shows on the air, even if you like listening
[20:45.000 --> 20:48.800]  to us on the radio. So I really encourage folks to do that.
[20:48.800 --> 20:57.520]  So now Randy. So Randy had an experience earlier this week concerning a habeas corpus that
[20:57.520 --> 21:02.000]  he's written for Tom Delay. So Randy, why don't you tell us about this?
[21:02.000 --> 21:08.440]  Yes, and I want to start out with a little word to Judge Dietz. Judge Dietz is a district
[21:08.440 --> 21:15.640]  judge here in Travis County. And I just want him to know I've been thrown out of better
[21:15.640 --> 21:27.960]  courthouses than his. I went to Judge Dietz's court. It seems that the Tom Delay case is
[21:27.960 --> 21:35.840]  finally coming to court. And Tom Delay did not take a deal. Good for him. Because case
[21:35.840 --> 21:41.480]  against him is bogus. So he didn't take the deal. He's going to court. They were, I just
[21:41.480 --> 21:49.560]  found out the day before that they were picking a jury in his case. So I had filed a writ
[21:49.560 --> 21:57.360]  of habeas corpus in the Tom Delay case early on when the case began. And Dick DeGera and
[21:57.360 --> 22:06.960]  his attorney and the judge, well actually the judge refused to hear the writ. And that's
[22:06.960 --> 22:14.600]  illegal. I'll be going after him for that. And Dick DeGera, Tom Delay's attorney, called
[22:14.600 --> 22:19.680]  me and asked me if I had filed a writ in the case. And I said, yes I did. He said, well
[22:19.680 --> 22:23.560]  I'm the attorney of record and I didn't authorize that. I don't care what you authorized. You
[22:23.560 --> 22:30.600]  should have filed it yourself. Well he hung up on me. So it's a couple years later. Tom
[22:30.600 --> 22:38.840]  Delay's going to trial. And I went down to the court while they were doing jury selection.
[22:38.840 --> 22:43.720]  And when they went to lunch, I went up to Tom Delay and I said, Tom Delay, how does
[22:43.720 --> 22:50.400]  it feel to get screwed by the prosecutor? What are you talking about? Here, I handed
[22:50.400 --> 22:57.920]  him a copy of the writ of habeas corpus I filed in his case. Now let me clarify that
[22:57.920 --> 23:07.480]  I have no real interest in Tom Delay. The interest I do have is in due process. Ron
[23:07.480 --> 23:16.640]  Earl, as a political ploy, took out the Speaker of the House, third most powerful political
[23:16.640 --> 23:26.000]  official in the country, and did it totally outside law. I don't care so much about Tom
[23:26.000 --> 23:34.680]  Delay. What I care about is all these other people that the prosecutors are screwing by
[23:34.680 --> 23:42.720]  not following law. Now Tom Delay may be in a position to bring enough political pressure
[23:42.720 --> 23:50.200]  to bear to force this prosecutor to follow the law the way it's written. That's the
[23:50.200 --> 23:56.280]  reason I filed it. Well, they came back from lunch and started picking the jury and I stood
[23:56.280 --> 24:02.280]  up in the courtroom and told the judge, I have business with the court that supersedes
[24:02.280 --> 24:08.020]  any business now before the court. And the judge said, are you the one with the writ
[24:08.020 --> 24:14.880]  of habeas corpus? Yes, I am. And he went on to inform me how he was not going to waste
[24:14.880 --> 24:22.960]  these good people's time with that writ. Ordered me to leave the courtroom and say nothing.
[24:22.960 --> 24:30.960]  Well, I had made a minor error, tactical error. When I gave the bailiff a copy of the writ
[24:30.960 --> 24:39.320]  and demanded that he give it to the judge, I told him that if the judge does not act
[24:39.320 --> 24:44.360]  on that writ, I'm going to ask you to arrest that judge, because I didn't want this to
[24:44.360 --> 24:51.600]  come as a surprise to him. I wanted his refusal to be well rehearsed so he didn't do anything
[24:51.600 --> 24:59.320]  stupid. Well, it was a minor tactical error because when the judge ordered me out of the
[24:59.320 --> 25:04.600]  courtroom, I was looking around for the bailiff so I could ask the bailiff to arrest the judge.
[25:04.600 --> 25:10.640]  But for some unknown reason, the bailiff was nowhere to be found. He actually went up and
[25:10.640 --> 25:17.160]  sat down by the judge, Randy. I didn't see him up there. He was sitting down right next
[25:17.160 --> 25:23.640]  to the court clerk. I missed him. So I was sure looking for him. I said, I need a bailiff.
[25:23.640 --> 25:27.720]  And I certainly didn't see him stand up. I think he was hiding from you, Randy. I think
[25:27.720 --> 25:33.260]  he put on his chicken suit. Maybe that's why I couldn't see him. But that's what I wanted
[25:33.260 --> 25:39.900]  to do. And I would have probably went to jail if I had. It would have been annoying and
[25:39.900 --> 25:45.800]  uncomfortable, but I would have gotten a better shot at the judge. As it is, I do have my
[25:45.800 --> 25:54.040]  shot at the judge. Since the judge denied an original writ, I get to go after him for
[25:54.040 --> 26:01.280]  official oppression and obstruction of justice. So now we'll be going after Judge Dietz directly
[26:01.280 --> 26:08.840]  with the grand jury, see if we can't get him indicted. I've got three grand juries, either
[26:08.840 --> 26:13.760]  three or five grand juries. I think it's three grand juries every three months in Travis
[26:13.760 --> 26:21.240]  County. Or maybe it's two grand juries, two grand juries every three months. I wonder
[26:21.240 --> 26:30.080]  what my chances are over the next couple of years of finding a grand jury member who has
[26:30.080 --> 26:38.720]  an axe to grind against Judge Dietz. One indictment, whether he gets prosecuted or not, would
[26:38.720 --> 26:45.480]  effectively end his career. Yeah, Randy, that Judge Dietz, he's the guy that refused to
[26:45.480 --> 26:52.360]  give us our temporary restraining order against what's his name, Stephen Lee. Yes, he is.
[26:52.360 --> 26:56.680]  And he was sitting there saying, well, why isn't the U.S. attorney here? And we kept
[26:56.680 --> 27:01.960]  telling him, because we're not suing the FCC. We're not suing the federal government. We're
[27:01.960 --> 27:08.320]  suing this guy personally. The U.S. attorney has no business representing him. But no,
[27:08.320 --> 27:15.040]  the guy just Dietz would not hear it at all. These judges are not impressed by sovereign
[27:15.040 --> 27:21.560]  citizens. Well, they're just not impressed by anything. Thomas Jefferson said when the
[27:21.560 --> 27:26.880]  people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there
[27:26.880 --> 27:31.520]  is liberty. Well, it's pretty obvious Dietz feared the U.S. attorney because he wasn't
[27:31.520 --> 27:35.760]  going to do anything without the U.S. attorney involved. He certainly feared the U.S. attorney
[27:35.760 --> 27:43.160]  more than me. And now we'll see if we can't get his attention. So one of the points of
[27:43.160 --> 27:51.800]  this is, is when you're exercising your rights and when you're exercising the law, it doesn't
[27:51.800 --> 28:01.400]  make any difference what the individuals do. We have a very good jurisprudence. I'm jurisprudence.
[28:01.400 --> 28:08.160]  Grand jury. No, no, no. I'm thinking a jury. Corpus Juris. Corpus Juris. I lost the word.
[28:08.160 --> 28:16.320]  Very good corpus juris. Body of law. It has all the checks and balances we need in there.
[28:16.320 --> 28:23.400]  And there has to be because these public officials are so corrupt. You know, they're all a bunch
[28:23.400 --> 28:30.680]  of low down, rotten, conniving scoundrels. And the problem with that is, is they tend
[28:30.680 --> 28:37.120]  to feed on one another. So they need these tools in place to protect themselves from
[28:37.120 --> 28:47.200]  each other. And right now, that's exactly what's needed. Now we have a politician, actually
[28:47.200 --> 28:55.360]  two politicians, Tom DeLay and Ron Earl, who's ex-district attorney. We have a current district
[28:55.360 --> 29:01.120]  attorney now. And the problem the current district attorney has, is the current district
[29:01.120 --> 29:06.120]  attorney can't claim they didn't know about all of these issues in the Ridley-Habes Corpus
[29:06.120 --> 29:12.680]  because they've had it for a couple of years. The judge in the case had it removed from
[29:12.680 --> 29:18.160]  the court record, but he didn't take it out of the prosecutor's file. So the prosecutor
[29:18.160 --> 29:23.640]  still has it. When I go to the grand jury, I'll take the prosecutor with me. Well, I'll
[29:23.640 --> 29:27.040]  actually go for him. First, I'm going to go down and file with the prosecutor and get
[29:27.040 --> 29:32.920]  the prosecutor to refuse to act. So then I get to go to the prosecutor for refusing to
[29:32.920 --> 29:38.560]  take criminal complaints against the district judge. Now this is all in state, this is all
[29:38.560 --> 29:43.920]  in state court now, folks. Yes, this is here in the state. That's why we were so flabbergasted
[29:43.920 --> 29:48.440]  about this state district judge being so terrified of a U.S. prosecutor. U.S. prosecutor doesn't
[29:48.440 --> 29:54.720]  even have your jurisdiction in this court. It's crazy. They all sleep in the same bed.
[29:54.720 --> 30:24.640]  I don't want to know. Okay. We'll be right back.
[30:25.640 --> 30:39.360]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment to tell you why handing over your
[30:39.360 --> 30:45.000]  driver's license could have a whole new meaning. Your search engine is watching you, recording
[30:45.000 --> 30:50.760]  all your searches and creating a massive database of your personal information. That's creepy.
[30:50.760 --> 30:56.000]  But it doesn't have to be that way. Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine.
[30:56.000 --> 31:00.120]  Startpage doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking
[31:00.120 --> 31:05.120]  cookies and they're third party certified. If you don't like big brother spying on you,
[31:05.120 --> 31:10.880]  start over with Startpage. Great search results and total privacy. Startpage.com, the world's
[31:10.880 --> 31:15.760]  most private search engine. Would you share your address with perfect strangers? Probably
[31:15.760 --> 31:19.920]  not. But if you hand your driver's license to a store clerk, you may be sharing even
[31:19.920 --> 31:25.400]  more. Licenses contain a goldmine of digital information like height, weight, address and
[31:25.400 --> 31:31.340]  birthdate. Stores can scan this into their databases to create marketing profiles. Overweight,
[31:31.340 --> 31:35.520]  you might get targeted advertising for the latest diet pill, all because you were carding.
[31:35.520 --> 31:40.880]  Here's a tip to make your next ID request less invasive. Place removable white tape
[31:40.880 --> 31:45.320]  over the magnetic strip and barcodes on your driver's license. The clerk will be able to
[31:45.320 --> 31:51.160]  make a visual verification but won't be able to download your data. I'm Dr. Katherine Albrecht.
[31:51.160 --> 32:16.640]  For more news and information at KatherineAlbrecht.com.
[32:51.160 --> 33:05.040]  Okay, folks, we're back. We got a caller, Brian, on the line. Brian, just hang on while
[33:05.040 --> 33:16.480]  Randy finishes about this writ. Yes, I wanted to talk about how to extract remedy and why
[33:16.480 --> 33:21.760]  it's okay that he threw me out of the court house, out of the courtroom. You know, most
[33:21.760 --> 33:31.280]  people get all upset and feel defeated and mistreated. I don't. I feel like the judge
[33:31.280 --> 33:39.920]  gave me opportunity. And if we're going to fight the system, we need to understand that.
[33:39.920 --> 33:45.520]  We have a really good corpus juris. And those who put it in place didn't put it in place
[33:45.520 --> 33:51.720]  because they were good guys. They put it in place because they were scoundrels. And they
[33:51.720 --> 33:55.840]  knew they were scoundrels and they assumed everybody else is a scoundrel. So they had
[33:55.840 --> 34:03.880]  to put something in place to protect themselves. But regardless of why they did it, it's there.
[34:03.880 --> 34:11.600]  And it's up to us to use it and exercise it. This is like a chess match. And everything's
[34:11.600 --> 34:20.560]  a pawn move until we get to the grand jury. Everything I'm doing is to set them up. I'm
[34:20.560 --> 34:28.960]  giving public officials opportunity to screw up until that judge ordered me out of that
[34:28.960 --> 34:37.680]  courtroom without hearing the writ. Had he heard the writ and then denied it immediately,
[34:37.680 --> 34:44.640]  I might have had a problem. But he was far too arrogant for that. He just refused to
[34:44.640 --> 34:53.640]  hear the writ. Didn't want to waste all these good people's time with this nonsense. Oh,
[34:53.640 --> 35:01.760]  so you think a writ of habeas corpus filed for the benefit of the ex Speaker of the House
[35:01.760 --> 35:09.600]  of the United States is nonsense. Do you? Well, we'll see what a grand jury of my peers
[35:09.600 --> 35:19.000]  thinks about your arrogance. So for me, that was a gift. I'll take that gift to the district
[35:19.000 --> 35:27.760]  attorney. I already took it to Judge Herb Evans. He's the justice of the peace there
[35:27.760 --> 35:35.720]  in the county courthouse. And he did this song and dance and seltzer down your pants.
[35:35.720 --> 35:42.040]  Fed me a bunch of nonsense about it. Who and when I can file and what judge could take
[35:42.040 --> 35:47.800]  a writ of habeas corpus. Said, well, Judge Deese was just there as an administrative
[35:47.800 --> 35:52.480]  judge. He is not a criminal judge. And he was just sitting in. And you can't file this
[35:52.480 --> 35:58.560]  with the administrative judge. And I said, Herb, where'd you get that? Did you just make
[35:58.560 --> 36:08.400]  that up? I can't find it in the law. So what I said, what I say, Eddie, Eddie was there.
[36:08.400 --> 36:13.120]  That's pretty close to what you said. He's telling me all this stuff. Now he knows it's
[36:13.120 --> 36:20.200]  horse manure. He knows that I know it's horse manure because I've been before Herb before
[36:20.200 --> 36:25.240]  trying to get him to take criminal complaints. And he's giving me a similar song and dance.
[36:25.240 --> 36:33.240]  And one time we spent about 45 minutes in a rather protracted give and take. And he
[36:33.240 --> 36:35.840]  finally just threw up his hands and said, well, I don't care what you say. I'm not
[36:35.840 --> 36:41.480]  going to do it. So he knew I knew. But he had a room full of people, a bunch of which
[36:41.480 --> 36:46.600]  I brought in with me, which was Eddie and Carolyn and Steve and several folks and a
[36:46.600 --> 36:51.960]  couple of people from Alex Jones's show. So he knew a lot of people were listening. So
[36:51.960 --> 37:00.000]  he did this jurist song and dance and I stonked all over his song and dance. And he finally
[37:00.000 --> 37:05.760]  just refused to take the complaint against Judge Dietz. I can't imagine him not taking
[37:05.760 --> 37:11.440]  a criminal complaint against the district judge. But now I get to go file criminal charges
[37:11.440 --> 37:22.720]  against Herb Evans. Herb Evans is a good one to file criminal charges against because frankly
[37:22.720 --> 37:33.800]  he really appears to be a good and fair, semi-fair judge. At least he's very polite. He's not
[37:33.800 --> 37:40.400]  one of these jerks that belittle individuals that come before him. And it seems everybody
[37:40.400 --> 37:48.480]  likes Herb. So he is the right one to go after. I'll go down and ask the grand jury to indict
[37:48.480 --> 38:03.000]  Herb, the honorable Herb, for not taking criminal complaints against a higher level public official.
[38:03.000 --> 38:11.680]  And it will be clear that I'm going after Herb just because he was afraid to go after
[38:11.680 --> 38:19.000]  a higher level official. Do you want to go after the guy who's essentially innocent?
[38:19.000 --> 38:28.880]  He's just kind of stuck in a bad spot. If Dietz lets Herb get indicted, Dietz will become
[38:28.880 --> 38:35.760]  the scum of the courthouse. And frankly, Dietz is really not the scum of the courthouse.
[38:35.760 --> 38:42.960]  There's some scummier judges down there. But if he lets Dietz get indicted because of what
[38:42.960 --> 38:51.400]  he did, he's not going to be well liked around there. And he probably won't like himself.
[38:51.400 --> 38:58.400]  But I will go to the district attorney with criminal charges against Herb. And the district
[38:58.400 --> 39:00.760]  attorney is going to like Herb. And he's not going to want to mess with Herb. And he's
[39:00.760 --> 39:08.160]  going to refuse to take my complaint. At least I hope he does. Because now I get to go after
[39:08.160 --> 39:15.400]  the district attorney. When you go to a grand jury, the first thing you want to hand to
[39:15.400 --> 39:22.920]  the grand jury is a criminal complaint against the district attorney. Because the only one
[39:22.920 --> 39:29.920]  who will tend to interfere with your access to the grand jury is the district attorney.
[39:29.920 --> 39:37.440]  But when the complaints are against the district attorney himself, then it becomes a very sticky
[39:37.440 --> 39:43.560]  situation for him to come down and open his mouth. And frankly, the district attorney
[39:43.560 --> 39:49.920]  is going to recognize the routine. I've ran it on him a couple of times. So I suspect
[39:49.920 --> 39:54.800]  they know I'm coming. We have a new district attorney. It's our first year in office. She's
[39:54.800 --> 40:03.920]  not likely to feel as confident in her position as Ron Earl did. And she's going to know that
[40:03.920 --> 40:09.080]  I'm the one that got all of the highest judges in Texas put before a grand jury a couple
[40:09.080 --> 40:16.680]  years ago, the Court of Criminal Appeals. So this is going to be an interesting dynamic
[40:16.680 --> 40:22.360]  to see what the prosecutor does. It may turn out that we actually have a smart prosecutor.
[40:22.360 --> 40:27.320]  And if the prosecutor's really smart, he'll take my complaint, give it to the grand jury,
[40:27.320 --> 40:32.960]  argue against indictment, get it thrown out. Somehow I don't think she's going to be that
[40:32.960 --> 40:39.920]  smart. Somehow I think she's going to stand in my way, and then I get to go after her,
[40:39.920 --> 40:46.280]  which is wonderful, which is exactly what I want. And my point of all this is, we as
[40:46.280 --> 40:55.560]  sovereigns have powers and abilities far beyond those of mortal judges and prosecutors. We
[40:55.560 --> 41:02.520]  can do things they can't even think about doing. The only reason these officials are
[41:02.520 --> 41:10.960]  acting in violation of law is because you and I have not done our jobs. We have not
[41:10.960 --> 41:21.120]  went in as sovereign citizens and exercised our sovereign duty, which is to report crime.
[41:21.120 --> 41:30.640]  If we start doing that, if we start reporting crime against, by public officials, we will
[41:30.640 --> 41:41.360]  change everything. Because the one thing they know for sure is you never know what a grand
[41:41.360 --> 41:49.680]  jury will do. The prosecutor, the judge, no one has any direct control over the grand
[41:49.680 --> 41:58.960]  jury. All they have is the ability to schmooze. Well, that may work and it may not, and they
[41:58.960 --> 42:05.520]  know it. Going to the grand jury against a public official is like playing Russian roulette
[42:05.520 --> 42:16.480]  with their career. We get one indictment. If the grand jury votes to indict, Judge Dietz,
[42:16.480 --> 42:25.240]  his career is over. Herb Evans, prosecutor and attorney, no way that prosecutor get reelected.
[42:25.240 --> 42:32.360]  The prosecutor will be removed from office immediately, even if the corrupt judges subsequently
[42:32.360 --> 42:38.520]  throw out the indictment, which they almost certainly will because they're corrupt. And
[42:38.520 --> 42:43.360]  prosecutor gets back in office, it'll so discredit him, they won't have a chance in another office
[42:43.360 --> 42:50.480]  and probably wouldn't run anyway because prosecutor wouldn't want to risk another shot at the
[42:50.480 --> 43:01.480]  grand jury and maybe actually getting prosecuted. We have this power. We can wield it with relative
[43:01.480 --> 43:11.520]  impunity and the powers that be will do everything they can to hide that fact from you. I have
[43:11.520 --> 43:17.780]  asked a bailiff to drag more than one judge off the bench and throw him in jail and never
[43:17.780 --> 43:26.360]  have I been threatened with contempt to court not once. They know how vulnerable they are.
[43:26.360 --> 43:34.280]  They don't want you to know how vulnerable they are. But I do. Okay. When we come back
[43:34.280 --> 43:42.440]  on the other side, we'll start taking calls. And doesn't have to be on point. I made my
[43:42.440 --> 43:49.080]  point. Now let's go to some interesting issues. This is Randy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Eddie
[43:49.080 --> 44:01.400]  Craig, Rule of Law Radio. We'll be right back on the other side.
[44:01.400 --> 44:08.760]  More energy, stronger immune power, improved sense of wellbeing. How many supplements have
[44:08.760 --> 44:14.440]  you heard boast of these benefits? The team behind Centrition believes that supplements
[44:14.440 --> 44:21.960]  should over deliver on their promises. And Centrition does just that. Centrition utilizes
[44:21.960 --> 44:26.960]  the ancient healing wisdom of Chinese medicine in conjunction with the science of modern
[44:26.960 --> 44:32.700]  nutrition. Adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing component and organic hemp protein
[44:32.700 --> 44:39.920]  and greens and superfoods act as a balanced nutrient base. Plus Centrition tastes great
[44:39.920 --> 44:47.360]  in just water. This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product and it's all natural.
[44:47.360 --> 44:57.600]  Visit Centrition.com to order yours or call 1-866-497-7436. After you use Centrition,
[44:57.600 --> 45:11.760]  you'll believe in supplements again. Aerial spray, chemtrails, the modified atmosphere,
[45:11.760 --> 45:18.600]  heavy metals and pesticides, carcinogens and chemical fibers all falling from the sky.
[45:18.600 --> 45:26.520]  You have a choice to keep your body clean. Detoxify with micro plant powder from HempUSA.org
[45:26.520 --> 45:36.640]  or call 908-691-2608. It's odorless and tasteless and used in any liquid or food. Protect your
[45:36.640 --> 45:43.880]  family now with micro plant powder. Cleaning out heavy metals, parasites and toxins. Order
[45:43.880 --> 45:51.720]  it now for daily intake and stock it now for long term storage. Visit HempUSA.org or call
[45:51.720 --> 45:58.720]  908-691-2608 today.
[46:51.720 --> 47:07.720]  The friction is an addiction. The hard work can leave you helplessness. There's hostility,
[47:07.720 --> 47:23.720]  there's drunken cruelty. Heavy loads of safe and unscathed. The time is colliding with
[47:23.720 --> 47:32.720]  the constant. You find out after a while. It's not your moral standard. It's your patience
[47:32.720 --> 47:35.720]  that's on track. Watch the sparks fly.
[47:35.720 --> 47:38.720]  Brian, thanks for calling in. What's on your mind tonight?
[47:38.720 --> 47:42.720]  Well, I've got a couple of questions. How are you all doing tonight?
[47:42.720 --> 47:45.720]  Doing good.
[47:45.720 --> 47:49.720]  My first question is, Randy, if we start filling your beer fund with a bunch of money, how
[47:49.720 --> 47:52.720]  are you going to answer all our questions?
[47:52.720 --> 47:54.720]  Two beers is all I eat.
[47:54.720 --> 47:57.720]  A little word, but he'll answer.
[47:57.720 --> 48:06.720]  Actually, just so everybody knows, I am essentially allergic to yeast. That stuff will set me
[48:06.720 --> 48:08.720]  on fire.
[48:08.720 --> 48:10.720]  So only whiskey?
[48:10.720 --> 48:16.720]  The beer fund is really a running joke. I'm a lightweight.
[48:16.720 --> 48:21.720]  What if I told you I am too?
[48:21.720 --> 48:23.720]  Okay, go ahead. Do you have a question?
[48:23.720 --> 48:29.720]  To help you guys out, there's several times I've wanted to call in and I've sat there
[48:29.720 --> 48:33.720]  and I've looked through the archives and it seems like magic. Almost every time there
[48:33.720 --> 48:37.720]  was something I was looking for, it just popped up right there in the archives and it was
[48:37.720 --> 48:39.720]  like, how did that happen?
[48:39.720 --> 48:48.720]  Call us anyway because we get into subjects and sometimes I'm about due process and I
[48:48.720 --> 48:53.720]  realize one time, it's been months since we talked about due process, so if you have
[48:53.720 --> 48:58.720]  questions, bring them up anyway even if you find them because we have a lot of other
[48:58.720 --> 49:05.720]  people that are just reluctant to call in and we don't get those issues brought out.
[49:05.720 --> 49:09.720]  We need them brought back up over and over so we can re-talk about them.
[49:09.720 --> 49:14.720]  Okay, well that brings up one. How about, I'm trying to look everywhere for the episode
[49:14.720 --> 49:19.720]  where you guys were talking about Minnesota judges and I found where you've talked bits
[49:19.720 --> 49:23.720]  and pieces, but I'm trying to find out, you guys have talked a lot about how corrupt
[49:23.720 --> 49:27.720]  Minnesota is and they can legislate from the bench, but I know that you guys were talking
[49:27.720 --> 49:32.720]  about one specific episode where you were talking probably more about it and I haven't
[49:32.720 --> 49:36.720]  been able to find it. I've gone almost all the way back through December of last year.
[49:36.720 --> 49:38.720]  Would you guys remember talking about it?
[49:38.720 --> 49:39.720]  No.
[49:39.720 --> 49:41.720]  That's probably with Gail.
[49:41.720 --> 49:47.720]  Yeah, the thing is, I'm sorry folks, I just do not have time to document the archives
[49:47.720 --> 49:53.720]  that much, especially not every, you know, sub-conversation and all these things.
[49:53.720 --> 49:59.720]  That's why I have set up the archive page as a blog and so folks, I need your help.
[49:59.720 --> 50:01.720]  This is another way that you can help us.
[50:01.720 --> 50:07.720]  All right, as you're listening to the show, if you feel so inclined, take some notes
[50:07.720 --> 50:14.720]  and after I post the archive, then post your own description of the archive as a comment
[50:14.720 --> 50:18.720]  and that will help me, it will help all the rest of the listeners, but there's no way
[50:18.720 --> 50:23.720]  that I can produce a show and be on the air and screen calls and document the content
[50:23.720 --> 50:27.720]  of the show and document all the archives descriptions. That's not possible.
[50:27.720 --> 50:29.720]  I need your help, folks, to do that.
[50:29.720 --> 50:36.720]  Maybe we should ask our callers, at least on occasion, to go into that and post a comment
[50:36.720 --> 50:38.720]  about what we talked about.
[50:38.720 --> 50:40.720]  Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
[50:40.720 --> 50:44.720]  And what you thought about it, you know, just so, you don't have to document our,
[50:44.720 --> 50:50.720]  necessarily document our show, but just put in a little comment of what we talked about
[50:50.720 --> 50:54.720]  and what, you know, what you thought about how we answered, whether you liked it
[50:54.720 --> 50:59.720]  or didn't like it, just so if people want to know what's went on, they can go through
[50:59.720 --> 51:07.720]  this and kind of get an idea of what we talked about. We are extremely busy.
[51:07.720 --> 51:15.720]  Chapman, there's Bob Chapman, he documents his show meticulously and I don't know
[51:15.720 --> 51:17.720]  where he gets that time.
[51:17.720 --> 51:23.720]  Well, he's probably sitting there making notes during the show.
[51:23.720 --> 51:27.720]  Well, he's got to be younger than me because he can multitask.
[51:27.720 --> 51:32.720]  I can't be, Deborah says, didn't you read my Skype? I said, no, I can't read the Skype
[51:32.720 --> 51:36.720]  and talk. I can't do two things at once. I don't know how he gets his stuff
[51:36.720 --> 51:40.720]  so meticulously documented. I envy him for that.
[51:40.720 --> 51:43.720]  And unless he may have someone else doing it.
[51:43.720 --> 51:45.720]  He probably has somebody else doing it.
[51:45.720 --> 51:50.720]  And we can't, we really are, this, everything comes out of our pockets
[51:50.720 --> 51:54.720]  and we have to struggle to keep up. I know most people work a job
[51:54.720 --> 51:58.720]  and then they come home. We don't do that. We never come home.
[51:58.720 --> 52:02.720]  The job is home. We never stop. So if you could do that,
[52:02.720 --> 52:05.720]  it would be a great assistance to us.
[52:05.720 --> 52:10.720]  Would it ease your minds to know that I've been documenting it?
[52:10.720 --> 52:13.720]  Probably, I just have to find the time to enter it in,
[52:13.720 --> 52:16.720]  but I've been documenting it all the way through the beginning of the year
[52:16.720 --> 52:20.720]  into last December so I have to find the time to go enter that in.
[52:20.720 --> 52:23.720]  That would be great. We really appreciate that, Brian.
[52:23.720 --> 52:28.720]  This is a problem. We have some shows sometimes that are really good.
[52:28.720 --> 52:32.720]  I have people call in and I want to say go to this show,
[52:32.720 --> 52:35.720]  but I don't remember which one it was.
[52:35.720 --> 52:38.720]  I think I'm coming up with a pretty good list.
[52:38.720 --> 52:40.720]  How do I find the time to get in there and do that?
[52:40.720 --> 52:44.720]  Especially when I'm trying to break down Minnesota statues.
[52:44.720 --> 52:49.720]  Welcome to our world, Brian.
[52:49.720 --> 52:54.720]  Yeah, we're breaking down statues from every state in the country just about.
[52:54.720 --> 52:57.720]  Well, it's great, too, when I find something where Eddie goes,
[52:57.720 --> 52:59.720]  you know, I found something yesterday where Eddie's like,
[52:59.720 --> 53:02.720]  I was going through Minnesota code and it's just impossible,
[53:02.720 --> 53:06.720]  and it's great that I can just go, I don't know what he's talking about.
[53:06.720 --> 53:12.720]  There is somewhere, I think Jeff Sedgwick can find it for me,
[53:12.720 --> 53:16.720]  there is a cross-reference that cross-references all of the statues
[53:16.720 --> 53:20.720]  from the different states, and I really need that.
[53:20.720 --> 53:21.720]  That would be a great asset.
[53:21.720 --> 53:23.720]  A number of people have talked about it,
[53:23.720 --> 53:25.720]  and they've even mentioned it on the show,
[53:25.720 --> 53:30.720]  but I didn't get it logged in, I didn't get it written down where it's at.
[53:30.720 --> 53:34.720]  If anybody can find that for me, I'd very much like to see it.
[53:34.720 --> 53:37.720]  Yes, I'd like to see it too.
[53:37.720 --> 53:44.720]  Basically, all of the states are based on the federal requirements,
[53:44.720 --> 53:50.720]  and the feds have encouraged all of the states to adopt a uniform
[53:50.720 --> 53:54.720]  penal code, criminal procedure, and civil code,
[53:54.720 --> 53:58.720]  so that no matter what state I'm in,
[53:58.720 --> 54:04.720]  I can be held responsible for generally knowing what the law is.
[54:04.720 --> 54:08.720]  There may be minor variations within a particular state,
[54:08.720 --> 54:15.720]  but I can move around the country and not be overly concerned
[54:15.720 --> 54:17.720]  about not understanding the law.
[54:17.720 --> 54:21.720]  Anybody who's traveled to foreign countries understands this concern.
[54:21.720 --> 54:25.720]  When I went to Thailand, when I was in the military,
[54:25.720 --> 54:30.720]  they told us if you drop a Thai note,
[54:30.720 --> 54:35.720]  whatever you do, do not catch it with your foot,
[54:35.720 --> 54:40.720]  because in Thailand, the head was exalted,
[54:40.720 --> 54:45.720]  the foot was insulting and lowly.
[54:45.720 --> 54:50.720]  If you put your foot on a note with the picture of the king in it,
[54:50.720 --> 54:54.720]  they would beat you half to death.
[54:54.720 --> 54:57.720]  Now, there's no way an American would tend to know that
[54:57.720 --> 55:01.720]  unless he was actually specifically told.
[55:01.720 --> 55:03.720]  That was the reason in the United States,
[55:03.720 --> 55:06.720]  we can go anywhere and feel relatively comfortable
[55:06.720 --> 55:09.720]  that we understand how the law works.
[55:09.720 --> 55:15.720]  The states have been encouraged to keep a uniform corpus juris.
[55:15.720 --> 55:21.720]  The point of that is what we talk about here is the corpus juris.
[55:21.720 --> 55:24.720]  The trick is we're in Texas,
[55:24.720 --> 55:28.720]  so we're intimately familiar with Texas statute,
[55:28.720 --> 55:32.720]  but it should cross-reference to most other states.
[55:32.720 --> 55:38.720]  Once you understand the basic underlying structure of what we're talking about,
[55:38.720 --> 55:45.720]  then all you have to do is go in and look for the things that are not the same.
[55:45.720 --> 55:47.720]  It saves you a whole lot of time.
[55:47.720 --> 55:50.720]  If we have this documented before we talk about these issues,
[55:50.720 --> 55:52.720]  it makes life a whole lot easier for everybody.
[55:52.720 --> 55:56.720]  Thank you, Brian, for helping us document.
[55:56.720 --> 55:59.720]  Definitely.
[55:59.720 --> 56:03.720]  Every time I'm looking around in the statute, it seems hopeless,
[56:03.720 --> 56:07.720]  and I can't find things that are similar to Texas statute,
[56:07.720 --> 56:09.720]  but then I find them there tucked away.
[56:09.720 --> 56:13.720]  How good of news is it that I found that for the grand jury,
[56:13.720 --> 56:19.720]  the grand jury requires an indictment on all complaints.
[56:19.720 --> 56:23.720]  I found it. It was tucked away, but it was hard to find.
[56:23.720 --> 56:28.720]  That's the same as Texas, misdemeanor and felony.
[56:28.720 --> 56:29.720]  Right.
[56:29.720 --> 56:30.720]  Oh, that'll be a lot of fun.
[56:30.720 --> 56:35.720]  Yeah, it was never meant that the state has the power to try the case
[56:35.720 --> 56:39.720]  without the jury of the peers determining there's a reason to have a case.
[56:39.720 --> 56:42.720]  That's what the grand jury is all about.
[56:42.720 --> 56:44.720]  Well, and what it seems, what it comes down to is, Eddie,
[56:44.720 --> 56:50.720]  it's the black hole you talk about, and I'm trying to outline the black hole now.
[56:50.720 --> 56:56.720]  And fortunately, I'm getting to the point where I'm trying to formulate a strategy
[56:56.720 --> 57:02.720]  and do more research than time I have allowed before I'm going to go for an arraignment.
[57:02.720 --> 57:06.720]  Well, again, welcome to our world.
[57:06.720 --> 57:08.720]  Okay, Brian, you're going to an arraignment.
[57:08.720 --> 57:11.720]  Have you been to an examining trial?
[57:11.720 --> 57:12.720]  No.
[57:12.720 --> 57:14.720]  Okay, look at that.
[57:14.720 --> 57:18.720]  So when you go to what they're going to call an arraignment,
[57:18.720 --> 57:22.720]  look at what Eddie's been talking about about due process,
[57:22.720 --> 57:26.720]  what we've been talking about about due process.
[57:26.720 --> 57:29.720]  Is this traffic or criminal?
[57:29.720 --> 57:30.720]  It's traffic.
[57:30.720 --> 57:35.720]  It's for, well, vehicle tax, so the tabs on the vehicle.
[57:35.720 --> 57:37.720]  Oh, okay, so you got a ticket.
[57:37.720 --> 57:38.720]  I got three of them.
[57:38.720 --> 57:39.720]  Okay, good.
[57:39.720 --> 57:46.720]  Then first thing to do is go after subject matter jurisdiction.
[57:46.720 --> 57:47.720]  Okay.
[57:47.720 --> 57:50.720]  Subject matter jurisdiction is a hoot.
[57:50.720 --> 57:53.720]  Well, and here's the, with the ticket, answer me this,
[57:53.720 --> 57:58.720]  because I was looking at Eddie's motions and whatnot and how to challenge their jurisdiction.
[57:58.720 --> 58:04.720]  The citation itself has the name of the municipality and the district on the heading.
[58:04.720 --> 58:09.720]  Yes, but what does your state statute say the requisites of a proper complaint are?
[58:09.720 --> 58:13.720]  Does the citation meet all of them?
[58:13.720 --> 58:17.720]  No, and that's the black hole I'm trying to figure out.
[58:17.720 --> 58:20.720]  Okay, you get that figure out, figured out.
[58:20.720 --> 58:25.720]  We're going to use you as our Minnesota reference.
[58:25.720 --> 58:26.720]  Awesome.
[58:26.720 --> 58:28.720]  I get a lot of people with Minnesota problems,
[58:28.720 --> 58:31.720]  and I don't have anyone in Minnesota to send them to.
[58:31.720 --> 58:34.720]  Well, could you guys take a look at my strategy quick here?
[58:34.720 --> 58:36.720]  Right after the break.
[58:36.720 --> 58:38.720]  We've got a full board of callers.
[58:38.720 --> 58:40.720]  We've got like eight callers on the line.
[58:40.720 --> 58:41.720]  Call in tomorrow night.
[58:41.720 --> 58:45.720]  We'll have a lot more time, and I'd like you to do this.
[58:45.720 --> 58:47.720]  Can I hang over for one question?
[58:47.720 --> 58:48.720]  Yes, one question.
[58:48.720 --> 58:51.720]  Just one, because we've got a full board of callers,
[58:51.720 --> 58:53.720]  and we just got through asking people to call in
[58:53.720 --> 58:56.720]  so that we can help them instead of writing us emails.
[58:56.720 --> 58:59.720]  Okay, we'll be right back, folks.
[58:59.720 --> 59:03.720]  The Bible remains the most popular book in the world,
[59:03.720 --> 59:07.720]  yet countless readers are frustrated because they struggle to understand it.
[59:07.720 --> 59:11.720]  Some new translations try to help by simplifying the text,
[59:11.720 --> 59:16.720]  but in the process can compromise the profound meaning of the Scripture.
[59:16.720 --> 59:18.720]  Enter the recovery version.
[59:18.720 --> 59:22.720]  First, this new translation is extremely faithful and accurate,
[59:22.720 --> 59:27.720]  but the real story is the more than 9,000 explanatory footnotes.
[59:27.720 --> 59:31.720]  Difficult and profound passages are opened up in a marvelous way,
[59:31.720 --> 59:34.720]  providing an entrance into the riches of the Word
[59:34.720 --> 59:37.720]  beyond which you've ever experienced before.
[59:37.720 --> 59:42.720]  Bibles for America would like to give you a free recovery version simply for the asking.
[59:42.720 --> 59:48.720]  This comprehensive yet compact study Bible is yours just by calling us toll-free
[59:48.720 --> 59:57.720]  at 1-888-551-0102 or by ordering online at freestudybible.com.
[59:57.720 --> 59:59.720]  That's freestudybible.com.
[59:59.720 --> 01:00:03.720]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[01:00:03.720 --> 01:00:08.720]  Financial analyst Eric Blair warns an engineered stock market crash is coming.
[01:00:08.720 --> 01:00:13.720]  The elite are jumping ship in droves and investors should get out ASAP.
[01:00:13.720 --> 01:00:15.720]  Analyst Tyler Durden wrote,
[01:00:15.720 --> 01:00:21.720]  after last week saw an insider selling-to-buy ratio of 1,411 to 1,
[01:00:21.720 --> 01:00:26.720]  this week the ratio has nearly doubled, hitting a ridiculous 2,340 to 1.
[01:00:26.720 --> 01:00:31.720]  CNBC reported Wednesday the insider sell-to-buy ratio
[01:00:31.720 --> 01:00:36.720]  was a staggering 3,177 to 1.
[01:00:36.720 --> 01:00:39.720]  Afghan President Hamid Karzai has extended the deadline
[01:00:39.720 --> 01:00:41.720]  for private security firms to disband,
[01:00:41.720 --> 01:00:46.720]  a move meant to preserve foreign reconstruction projects worth billions of dollars.
[01:00:46.720 --> 01:00:51.720]  Karzai had claimed private guards undermined his nation's army and police
[01:00:51.720 --> 01:00:54.720]  and said Afghan security forces should take on the job
[01:00:54.720 --> 01:00:57.720]  of providing protection for foreign aid workers.
[01:00:57.720 --> 01:00:59.720]  The deadline will be extended two months
[01:00:59.720 --> 01:01:05.720]  while officials come up with a timetable for phasing out the companies.
[01:01:05.720 --> 01:01:09.720]  Survivors of a tsunami that struck the western coast of Indonesia Monday
[01:01:09.720 --> 01:01:13.720]  say they were given little or no warning before disaster struck.
[01:01:13.720 --> 01:01:17.720]  At least 369 people are dead and 338 missing.
[01:01:17.720 --> 01:01:21.720]  Indonesia installed an expensive tsunami alarm boy system
[01:01:21.720 --> 01:01:27.720]  after 168,000 people were killed by the massive tsunami of 2004.
[01:01:27.720 --> 01:01:31.720]  People say the alarm system has never worked.
[01:01:31.720 --> 01:01:34.720]  NPR reported Thursday private prison corporations
[01:01:34.720 --> 01:01:37.720]  helped draft Arizona's anti-immigration law
[01:01:37.720 --> 01:01:40.720]  which requires police lock up anyone they stop
[01:01:40.720 --> 01:01:43.720]  who can't show proof they enter the country legally.
[01:01:43.720 --> 01:01:47.720]  The bill, which passed in April and has been stalled in federal courts,
[01:01:47.720 --> 01:01:50.720]  could send hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants to prison,
[01:01:50.720 --> 01:01:55.720]  resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars in profits for private prison companies.
[01:01:55.720 --> 01:01:59.720]  Arizona State Senator Russell Pierce says the new law was his idea,
[01:01:59.720 --> 01:02:02.720]  but instead of taking it to the Arizona State House,
[01:02:02.720 --> 01:02:04.720]  he pitched his idea of locking up immigrants
[01:02:04.720 --> 01:02:06.720]  to the Corrections Corporation of America,
[01:02:06.720 --> 01:02:09.720]  the largest private prison company in the US.
[01:02:09.720 --> 01:02:13.720]  CCA executives helped draft the legislation with Pierce.
[01:02:13.720 --> 01:02:15.720]  Once the bill was introduced,
[01:02:15.720 --> 01:02:21.720]  30 of the bill's 36 co-sponsors received donations from prison companies.
[01:02:21.720 --> 01:02:24.720]  Mikhail Gorbachev, former leader of the Soviet Union,
[01:02:24.720 --> 01:02:27.720]  says military victory in Afghanistan is impossible,
[01:02:27.720 --> 01:02:30.720]  warning the war risk turning into another Vietnam.
[01:02:30.720 --> 01:02:34.720]  Gorbachev, who pulled Russian troops out of Afghanistan in 1989
[01:02:34.720 --> 01:02:39.720]  after a 10-year war, said the US had no alternative but to withdraw troops.
[01:02:39.720 --> 01:02:44.720]  Gorbachev added that as the Soviets prepared to withdraw from Afghanistan 20 years ago,
[01:02:44.720 --> 01:02:46.720]  the US was training militants,
[01:02:46.720 --> 01:02:50.720]  the same ones who today are terrorizing Afghanistan.
[01:02:50.720 --> 01:02:54.720]  He said that because of this, withdrawal would be more difficult.
[01:03:20.720 --> 01:03:23.720]  They want to charge down Babylon,
[01:03:23.720 --> 01:03:25.720]  and burn down the whole nation.
[01:03:25.720 --> 01:03:28.720]  We tell them to operate the land rack,
[01:03:28.720 --> 01:03:31.720]  and we'll sell it to the Republicans and Democrats.
[01:03:31.720 --> 01:03:33.720]  Tell them I'm a libertarian.
[01:03:33.720 --> 01:03:35.720]  They'll sell me back to the Bolgons,
[01:03:35.720 --> 01:03:37.720]  and we'll come back.
[01:03:42.720 --> 01:03:44.720]  And what do we say?
[01:03:45.720 --> 01:03:47.720]  I tell them,
[01:03:47.720 --> 01:03:49.720]  That we want weapons.
[01:03:49.720 --> 01:03:51.720]  We want war.
[01:03:51.720 --> 01:03:53.720]  We want justice.
[01:03:53.720 --> 01:03:55.720]  We want war.
[01:03:55.720 --> 01:03:57.720]  We want romance.
[01:03:57.720 --> 01:04:00.720]  We want war.
[01:04:00.720 --> 01:04:02.720]  We want peace.
[01:04:02.720 --> 01:04:04.720]  We want war.
[01:04:04.720 --> 01:04:06.720]  We want peace.
[01:04:06.720 --> 01:04:08.720]  We want war.
[01:04:08.720 --> 01:04:10.720]  We want war.
[01:04:10.720 --> 01:04:13.720]  And all of them, when I talk, when I speak,
[01:04:13.720 --> 01:04:16.720]  they all say I was created equally.
[01:04:16.720 --> 01:04:42.720]  to chant them man, me chant up Babylon, because Babylon is wrong, the only right man, me say is the rest man, we take me say lord man, before we on the moon, to chant down Babylon, no not later, to let Babylon know, say we get him greater, we write the donkey, me say to Deleli, say Jesus Christ shall rescue him,
[01:04:42.720 --> 01:04:46.720]  and we will chant down my name.
[01:04:46.720 --> 01:04:51.720]  Chant for Chantimong, because the strings will run, chant for Chantimong.
[01:04:51.720 --> 01:04:53.720]  Ok folks we are back, we are taking your call.
[01:04:53.720 --> 01:05:00.720]  We do have a full board of callers right now, so we are going to try and do everything we can to get to everyone.
[01:05:00.720 --> 01:05:02.720]  And lets keep things efficient!
[01:05:02.720 --> 01:05:05.720]  Ok Brian you had one other question quickly.
[01:05:05.720 --> 01:05:09.720]  Yea in respects to everyone else, because this is the only night I can call in.
[01:05:09.720 --> 01:05:11.600]  I just wanted to know, and I haven't heard you guys ever
[01:05:11.600 --> 01:05:14.240]  talk about this, but do you have any experience with
[01:05:14.240 --> 01:05:18.840]  challenging the accepted fines clause in court?
[01:05:18.840 --> 01:05:19.920]  Ah, that's a good point.
[01:05:19.920 --> 01:05:21.840]  No, we haven't.
[01:05:21.840 --> 01:05:25.360]  But there's a set dollar limit on the ones here in Texas.
[01:05:25.360 --> 01:05:28.800]  The set dollar limit is $200 or less.
[01:05:28.800 --> 01:05:30.840]  And if you ask for a jury trial, the jury
[01:05:30.840 --> 01:05:32.520]  can set the amount.
[01:05:32.520 --> 01:05:35.400]  The difference here, however, is what they hit you with in
[01:05:35.400 --> 01:05:39.440]  court fees, which can greatly exceed what the fine
[01:05:39.440 --> 01:05:40.920]  itself is.
[01:05:40.920 --> 01:05:43.600]  So there's no doubt you're getting hit far and above and
[01:05:43.600 --> 01:05:45.640]  beyond what the penalty is worth.
[01:05:45.640 --> 01:05:46.200]  Wait a minute.
[01:05:46.200 --> 01:05:49.840]  How do they get extra court fees?
[01:05:49.840 --> 01:05:53.600]  As I remember reading the code, they're restricted on
[01:05:53.600 --> 01:05:56.240]  specifically what they can charge as court costs.
[01:05:56.240 --> 01:06:00.200]  Yeah, well, what they're limited to and what they do,
[01:06:00.200 --> 01:06:03.840]  as you well know, is two different things.
[01:06:03.840 --> 01:06:04.200]  OK, then.
[01:06:04.200 --> 01:06:10.400]  Do you think the citation for $40, the fine, or sorry,
[01:06:10.400 --> 01:06:14.080]  vehicle registration is $40, the citation is $130.
[01:06:14.080 --> 01:06:16.920]  If I got three of those citations, I mean, to me that
[01:06:16.920 --> 01:06:18.160]  seems a little excessive.
[01:06:20.480 --> 01:06:27.560]  Well, it's a $200 per event type of deal.
[01:06:27.560 --> 01:06:32.520]  For each offense, the maximum fine is $200.
[01:06:32.520 --> 01:06:34.640]  Do you have any suggestion on where I could do research on
[01:06:34.640 --> 01:06:36.840]  for this?
[01:06:36.840 --> 01:06:39.040]  Your statutes is going to be the only place that you're
[01:06:39.040 --> 01:06:41.640]  going to be able to do viable research on it.
[01:06:41.640 --> 01:06:44.520]  You need an annotated version of your statutes.
[01:06:44.520 --> 01:06:48.120]  Yeah, OK.
[01:06:48.120 --> 01:06:51.480]  Do you have a good legal library close by?
[01:06:51.480 --> 01:06:52.920]  Right, right.
[01:06:52.920 --> 01:06:53.880]  Yes, I do.
[01:06:53.880 --> 01:07:01.960]  OK, another suggestion is contact local attorneys and
[01:07:01.960 --> 01:07:04.920]  feed them a line of crapola.
[01:07:04.920 --> 01:07:08.080]  Tell them you're homeschooling your kids and you want to do a
[01:07:08.080 --> 01:07:12.680]  course in law.
[01:07:12.680 --> 01:07:18.160]  And ask the attorneys what sorts of litigation guides are
[01:07:18.160 --> 01:07:22.240]  available in Minnesota.
[01:07:22.240 --> 01:07:25.280]  And then when you find out, ask them, do you have any old
[01:07:25.280 --> 01:07:29.120]  ones, because every time a new one comes out, all the law
[01:07:29.120 --> 01:07:33.360]  firms buy the new ones because every attorney wants to quote
[01:07:33.360 --> 01:07:36.160]  the most current law.
[01:07:36.160 --> 01:07:41.040]  So I had a woman in Amarillo who actually was homeschooling
[01:07:41.040 --> 01:07:44.640]  her kids and did want to give them a course.
[01:07:44.640 --> 01:07:46.480]  So I suggested she call some attorneys.
[01:07:46.480 --> 01:07:49.480]  The third attorney, she said, do you have any litigation
[01:07:49.480 --> 01:07:50.720]  guides, what do you have?
[01:07:50.720 --> 01:07:53.760]  And he told her, do you have any old ones?
[01:07:53.760 --> 01:07:59.600]  He said, do you have a pickup truck or a station wagon?
[01:07:59.600 --> 01:08:02.880]  Now, these manuals, these books, I'm looking at about 10
[01:08:02.880 --> 01:08:05.960]  of them on my shelf, they cost like $120 to
[01:08:05.960 --> 01:08:09.200]  $170 a piece.
[01:08:09.200 --> 01:08:13.880]  But he had these old ones that were absolutely worthless.
[01:08:13.880 --> 01:08:17.000]  Once the new ones come out, he does not want his people
[01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:18.760]  looking at the old ones.
[01:08:18.760 --> 01:08:19.720]  So he had stacks of them.
[01:08:19.720 --> 01:08:21.560]  Come and get them.
[01:08:21.560 --> 01:08:24.080]  You get the litigation guides, they tell you everything you
[01:08:24.080 --> 01:08:25.720]  need to know.
[01:08:25.720 --> 01:08:31.080]  And what you need to know is what the controlling cases are.
[01:08:31.080 --> 01:08:35.280]  There are thousands and thousands of cases out there.
[01:08:35.280 --> 01:08:37.960]  And when I first started doing research, I'm wondering, how
[01:08:37.960 --> 01:08:42.040]  on earth can these guys know what to cite?
[01:08:42.040 --> 01:08:48.560]  That's because the litigation guides, they handle the
[01:08:48.560 --> 01:08:50.880]  controlling cases.
[01:08:50.880 --> 01:08:54.000]  We filed a case in Nebraska.
[01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:58.440]  The judge denied our request for a temporary restraining
[01:08:58.440 --> 01:09:04.960]  order and gave us a six-page brief on why he denied it.
[01:09:04.960 --> 01:09:09.840]  And in there, there were 30 and 40-year-old cases.
[01:09:09.840 --> 01:09:12.720]  The judge will cite the controlling case.
[01:09:12.720 --> 01:09:14.160]  The attorneys don't.
[01:09:14.160 --> 01:09:17.760]  What the attorneys do will take the controlling case,
[01:09:17.760 --> 01:09:24.480]  jeopardize that case, and find the most current case that
[01:09:24.480 --> 01:09:28.440]  referenced the controlling case on the point that they're
[01:09:28.440 --> 01:09:29.800]  dealing with.
[01:09:29.800 --> 01:09:33.120]  And they cite the most current case.
[01:09:33.120 --> 01:09:34.960]  And that'll be specific to the state?
[01:09:34.960 --> 01:09:36.840]  Yeah, that'll be specific to the state.
[01:09:36.840 --> 01:09:40.520]  So they want the most current law.
[01:09:40.520 --> 01:09:43.600]  So if something's a year old or two years old,
[01:09:43.600 --> 01:09:45.320]  they don't touch it.
[01:09:45.320 --> 01:09:49.440]  So you call them, they give you all the litigation guides.
[01:09:49.440 --> 01:09:53.160]  I've got great reference material up here that costs me
[01:09:53.160 --> 01:09:55.680]  chump change.
[01:09:55.680 --> 01:09:58.080]  OK, so Brian, do you have anything else for us?
[01:09:58.080 --> 01:09:58.600]  No, that'll do it.
[01:09:58.600 --> 01:09:59.360]  Thank you very much.
[01:09:59.360 --> 01:10:01.640]  OK, great.
[01:10:01.640 --> 01:10:02.520]  That's all for now.
[01:10:02.520 --> 01:10:03.320]  OK, great.
[01:10:03.320 --> 01:10:04.560]  Awesome.
[01:10:04.560 --> 01:10:06.760]  OK, so we're going to go on now.
[01:10:06.760 --> 01:10:08.120]  We've got some first-time callers.
[01:10:08.120 --> 01:10:10.640]  We've got Rowdy in Texas.
[01:10:10.640 --> 01:10:12.600]  Rowdy, thanks for calling in.
[01:10:12.600 --> 01:10:13.520]  How are you tonight?
[01:10:13.520 --> 01:10:16.000]  What's on your mind?
[01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:19.320]  Good evening.
[01:10:19.320 --> 01:10:24.440]  Deborah, I just called to tell my brothers and sisters
[01:10:24.440 --> 01:10:28.880]  of Texas that it's a sad day in Texas for property rights.
[01:10:28.880 --> 01:10:32.560]  There was a trespass right to title
[01:10:32.560 --> 01:10:35.280]  case in Robertson County.
[01:10:35.280 --> 01:10:44.320]  And some real bad precedent was set today.
[01:10:44.320 --> 01:10:52.160]  There was a ruling which allowed the state
[01:10:52.160 --> 01:10:58.280]  to claim eschewment when there were known errors.
[01:10:58.280 --> 01:11:03.320]  And back up, what was that word you used?
[01:11:03.320 --> 01:11:05.520]  Eschewment.
[01:11:05.520 --> 01:11:06.840]  Spell that.
[01:11:06.840 --> 01:11:10.160]  E-S-C-H-T-T-E, eschewed.
[01:11:14.040 --> 01:11:15.600]  Are you familiar with that, Ramey?
[01:11:15.600 --> 01:11:18.640]  Absolutely never heard it before.
[01:11:18.640 --> 01:11:24.120]  Well, in title, it means that there are no known errors
[01:11:24.120 --> 01:11:28.440]  in the property eschewed to the state.
[01:11:28.440 --> 01:11:29.560]  Are you familiar with that?
[01:11:29.560 --> 01:11:32.240]  Yes, I am very familiar with that.
[01:11:32.240 --> 01:11:33.920]  OK.
[01:11:33.920 --> 01:11:37.680]  Well, there's a local attorney here in town
[01:11:37.680 --> 01:11:43.720]  that took not really an oil and gas lease.
[01:11:43.720 --> 01:11:46.480]  This has to do with some very valuable minerals
[01:11:46.480 --> 01:11:47.680]  in a large gas field.
[01:11:47.680 --> 01:11:50.040]  And there was a local attorney here in town
[01:11:50.040 --> 01:11:54.760]  that took a lease from the general land office.
[01:11:54.760 --> 01:11:56.160]  It's not really a lease.
[01:11:56.160 --> 01:11:58.680]  And he did it in bending the rules
[01:11:58.680 --> 01:12:00.320]  as he put in his discovery.
[01:12:00.320 --> 01:12:04.520]  And anyway, he was poured out at a hearing.
[01:12:04.520 --> 01:12:09.200]  But then he had himself appointed a district
[01:12:09.200 --> 01:12:12.560]  attorney for the district.
[01:12:12.560 --> 01:12:16.400]  And they were going to trial two weeks ago.
[01:12:16.400 --> 01:12:17.840]  And there was a recess.
[01:12:17.840 --> 01:12:21.200]  And I was hopeful that there was going
[01:12:21.200 --> 01:12:24.240]  to be some investigation on all the fraud and shenanigans
[01:12:24.240 --> 01:12:25.520]  that went on in the case.
[01:12:25.520 --> 01:12:27.840]  But that's not what happened.
[01:12:27.840 --> 01:12:39.960]  He used that power to abstain or claim
[01:12:39.960 --> 01:12:45.440]  20% of the minerals for himself or his clients or the state.
[01:12:45.440 --> 01:12:50.720]  I'm not really sure who's going to end up with it.
[01:12:50.720 --> 01:12:54.400]  But it's a sad day in Texas for property rights.
[01:12:54.400 --> 01:12:55.440]  I shouldn't be right.
[01:12:55.440 --> 01:12:57.160]  OK, I have it.
[01:12:57.160 --> 01:13:02.280]  E-S-C-H-E-A-T-M-E-N-T.
[01:13:02.280 --> 01:13:02.840]  Yes.
[01:13:02.840 --> 01:13:06.880]  The process of turning over unclaimed or abandoned property
[01:13:06.880 --> 01:13:08.960]  to the state authority.
[01:13:08.960 --> 01:13:09.480]  Yes.
[01:13:09.480 --> 01:13:13.160]  Such as if the person dies without a will.
[01:13:13.160 --> 01:13:15.040]  Yes.
[01:13:15.040 --> 01:13:22.560]  Now, who is the one who took the property?
[01:13:22.560 --> 01:13:28.120]  Well, it was either Epsilon under their oil and gas lease.
[01:13:28.120 --> 01:13:30.240]  Or it's not really an oil and gas lease.
[01:13:30.240 --> 01:13:33.320]  It's a version of an oil and gas lease.
[01:13:33.320 --> 01:13:37.240]  With the state of Texas, it could be a.
[01:13:37.240 --> 01:13:41.080]  How could a private entity take land
[01:13:41.080 --> 01:13:44.560]  that was supposed to be going to the state
[01:13:44.560 --> 01:13:47.320]  because there was no will for a deceased?
[01:13:47.320 --> 01:13:50.880]  Well, it's a very complicated case.
[01:13:50.880 --> 01:13:56.600]  It has to do with a world-renowned geologist
[01:13:56.600 --> 01:13:59.920]  that was the dad joiner's geologist.
[01:13:59.920 --> 01:14:01.840]  It was minerals that were bought in the 30s.
[01:14:01.840 --> 01:14:02.560]  It's not land.
[01:14:02.560 --> 01:14:04.320]  It's minerals.
[01:14:04.320 --> 01:14:13.240]  And so Terry, who I was told was a fine attorney,
[01:14:13.240 --> 01:14:17.080]  somehow got himself appointed as district attorney
[01:14:17.080 --> 01:14:19.920]  after he had been pulled out of the case.
[01:14:19.920 --> 01:14:23.440]  And then.
[01:14:23.440 --> 01:14:24.600]  Well, Rowdy, listen.
[01:14:24.600 --> 01:14:26.800]  So it's a sad day for property rights.
[01:14:26.800 --> 01:14:28.680]  But who's being harmed here?
[01:14:28.680 --> 01:14:31.200]  Is there somebody that could challenge this situation
[01:14:31.200 --> 01:14:33.520]  or an appeal that could be filed?
[01:14:33.520 --> 01:14:36.520]  Where should the property have gone to?
[01:14:36.520 --> 01:14:39.920]  Who is the injured party that could do something about this?
[01:14:39.920 --> 01:14:41.960]  To the heirs.
[01:14:41.960 --> 01:14:44.600]  It should have gone to the heirs.
[01:14:44.600 --> 01:14:47.960]  OK, so are the heirs going to challenge this?
[01:14:47.960 --> 01:14:50.760]  Well, they're pretty much exhausted.
[01:14:50.760 --> 01:14:55.360]  And the judge made his ruling today.
[01:14:55.360 --> 01:15:00.000]  So that's not for me to decide.
[01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:00.920]  They're very unhappy.
[01:15:04.200 --> 01:15:11.560]  The point is that Texas is one of the last bastions
[01:15:11.560 --> 01:15:13.040]  of private property.
[01:15:13.040 --> 01:15:18.040]  And it's being a land man for 15 years,
[01:15:18.040 --> 01:15:21.400]  it's very discouraging to see what went on.
[01:15:21.400 --> 01:15:25.000]  And of course, I didn't go to the trial because I was.
[01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:27.920]  OK, OK, let me interrupt.
[01:15:27.920 --> 01:15:30.920]  And I don't mean to cut you short.
[01:15:30.920 --> 01:15:31.560]  Yes, sir.
[01:15:31.560 --> 01:15:34.440]  But we have a whole bank of callers.
[01:15:34.440 --> 01:15:34.960]  Yes, sir.
[01:15:34.960 --> 01:15:41.280]  And the issue you're bringing, for me, is very intriguing.
[01:15:41.280 --> 01:15:44.600]  But our callers are not going to have a clue as to what
[01:15:44.600 --> 01:15:48.360]  you're talking about because it's such a focused issue.
[01:15:48.360 --> 01:15:51.680]  And it is clearly an issue that in order for us
[01:15:51.680 --> 01:15:54.960]  to understand what is really going on,
[01:15:54.960 --> 01:15:58.680]  it'll take a long time to frame the issue.
[01:15:58.680 --> 01:16:03.400]  What I'm going to suggest, OK, first a quick question.
[01:16:03.400 --> 01:16:05.680]  Are you one of the heirs?
[01:16:05.680 --> 01:16:06.800]  No, sir.
[01:16:06.800 --> 01:16:08.680]  So you don't have standing?
[01:16:08.680 --> 01:16:10.120]  No, sir.
[01:16:10.120 --> 01:16:15.800]  Could you get an heir to prepare a narrative?
[01:16:15.800 --> 01:16:16.880]  Oh, yes.
[01:16:16.880 --> 01:16:19.720]  That is the most important thing you can have.
[01:16:19.720 --> 01:16:25.120]  And to everybody listening in any issue, keep copious records,
[01:16:25.120 --> 01:16:28.960]  write everything down, and convert all the details
[01:16:28.960 --> 01:16:34.080]  into a story that an ordinary person can make sense of.
[01:16:34.080 --> 01:16:36.160]  Problem here is it's going to take too long for us to go
[01:16:36.160 --> 01:16:38.960]  through all these details to make sense of it.
[01:16:38.960 --> 01:16:40.200]  We'd need you to call back.
[01:16:40.200 --> 01:16:42.000]  Well, my question, I have a question I want to ask you.
[01:16:42.000 --> 01:16:44.600]  OK, then a quick question on the other side.
[01:16:44.600 --> 01:16:47.960]  And then maybe Friday night, we can go into more detail
[01:16:47.960 --> 01:16:49.640]  because we've got four hours.
[01:16:49.640 --> 01:16:52.760]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens and Craig,
[01:16:52.760 --> 01:16:54.600]  Rule of Law Radio.
[01:16:54.600 --> 01:16:56.760]  We'll be right back on the other side.
[01:17:01.760 --> 01:17:03.640]  Capital Coin and Bullion is your local force
[01:17:03.640 --> 01:17:05.880]  for rare coins, precious metals, and coin supplies
[01:17:05.880 --> 01:17:07.400]  in the Austin metro area.
[01:17:07.400 --> 01:17:09.120]  We also ship worldwide.
[01:17:09.120 --> 01:17:10.880]  We are a family-owned and operated business
[01:17:10.880 --> 01:17:14.080]  that offers competitive prices on your coin and metal purchases.
[01:17:14.080 --> 01:17:17.520]  We buy, sell, trade, and consign rare coins, gold,
[01:17:17.520 --> 01:17:20.320]  and silver coin collections, precious metals, and scrap gold.
[01:17:20.320 --> 01:17:22.520]  We purchase and sell gold and jewelry items.
[01:17:22.520 --> 01:17:25.080]  We offer daily specials on coins and bullion.
[01:17:25.080 --> 01:17:27.640]  We are located at 5448 Burnett Road,
[01:17:27.640 --> 01:17:30.120]  Suite 3 at the corner of Burnett and Shulmark.
[01:17:30.120 --> 01:17:34.240]  And we're open Mondays and Fridays 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 5.
[01:17:34.240 --> 01:17:36.920]  You are welcome to stop in our shop during regular business hours
[01:17:36.920 --> 01:17:42.120]  or call 512-646-6440 with any questions.
[01:17:42.120 --> 01:17:44.720]  Ask for Chad and say you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio
[01:17:44.720 --> 01:17:46.320]  or Texas Liberty Radio.
[01:17:46.320 --> 01:17:49.400]  That's Capital Coin and Bullion at the corner of Burnett and Shulmark
[01:17:49.400 --> 01:17:53.440]  and we're open Mondays and Fridays 10 to 6, Saturdays 10 to 5.
[01:17:53.440 --> 01:18:00.360]  That's Capital Coin and Bullion 512-646-6440.
[01:18:00.360 --> 01:18:03.520]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM,
[01:18:03.520 --> 01:18:06.160]  but finding things on the internet isn't so easy.
[01:18:06.160 --> 01:18:09.160]  And neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:18:09.160 --> 01:18:12.000]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[01:18:12.000 --> 01:18:13.360]  Brave New Books?
[01:18:13.360 --> 01:18:13.960]  Yes.
[01:18:13.960 --> 01:18:16.760]  Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for
[01:18:16.760 --> 01:18:20.400]  by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and Gilbert Griffin.
[01:18:20.400 --> 01:18:24.360]  They even stock Interfood, Berkey Products, and Calvin Soaps.
[01:18:24.360 --> 01:18:26.680]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:18:26.680 --> 01:18:28.080]  Go check it out for yourself.
[01:18:28.080 --> 01:18:32.520]  It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:18:32.520 --> 01:18:35.840]  By UT, there's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:18:35.840 --> 01:18:38.400]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking
[01:18:38.400 --> 01:18:41.880]  for paying customers at the 500 MLK Parking Facility,
[01:18:41.880 --> 01:18:44.120]  just behind the bookstore.
[01:18:44.120 --> 01:18:47.080]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:18:47.080 --> 01:18:51.880]  Monday through Saturday, 11 AM to 9 PM, and 1 to 6 PM on Sundays.
[01:18:51.880 --> 01:18:55.720]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503,
[01:18:55.720 --> 01:19:00.400]  or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:19:00.400 --> 01:19:10.400]  ["Ain't Gonna Blame Me"]
[01:19:30.400 --> 01:19:35.400]  You put the beer in my pocket, took the money from my ass,
[01:19:35.400 --> 01:19:39.880]  ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again.
[01:19:39.880 --> 01:20:05.760]  Ain't gonna fool me, ain't gonna drop me with that same old sucker puns.
[01:20:05.760 --> 01:20:10.720]  I get it now, but then I must have been out too long.
[01:20:10.720 --> 01:20:15.680]  Back then you had room to move, but now you're feeling the crunch.
[01:20:15.680 --> 01:20:40.680]  Ain't gonna get me with that same old sucker puns.
[01:20:40.680 --> 01:20:45.680]  Ain't gonna please me with that same old sad song.
[01:20:45.680 --> 01:20:50.680]  You thought you were right, but now you've got it all wrong.
[01:20:50.680 --> 01:20:55.680]  It was a weak moment for me, but I had the power all along.
[01:20:55.680 --> 01:21:13.680]  Ain't gonna please me with that same old sad song.
[01:21:13.680 --> 01:21:17.680]  Okay, folks, we are back.
[01:21:17.680 --> 01:21:20.680]  Okay, we're taking your calls. We've got a full board of callers here.
[01:21:20.680 --> 01:21:23.680]  We're going now...
[01:21:23.680 --> 01:21:25.680]  We're going back to Rowdy in Texas.
[01:21:25.680 --> 01:21:28.680]  Okay, Rowdy, quickly, what's your question?
[01:21:28.680 --> 01:21:30.680]  My question is, in your experience,
[01:21:30.680 --> 01:21:37.680]  have you ever known or seen a participant of litigation be poured out
[01:21:37.680 --> 01:21:42.680]  and then poured out for lack of jurisdiction and then go back
[01:21:42.680 --> 01:21:47.680]  and have himself appointed district attorney to give himself jurisdiction
[01:21:47.680 --> 01:21:51.680]  when he doesn't live in the county?
[01:21:51.680 --> 01:21:55.680]  Okay, wait a minute, say that again, poured out?
[01:21:55.680 --> 01:21:56.680]  Yeah.
[01:21:56.680 --> 01:21:57.680]  What does that mean?
[01:21:57.680 --> 01:22:00.680]  He doesn't have to live in the county to be district attorney.
[01:22:00.680 --> 01:22:04.680]  The district covers several counties anyway.
[01:22:04.680 --> 01:22:08.680]  Okay.
[01:22:08.680 --> 01:22:12.680]  But now the question becomes, did he develop a conflict of interest
[01:22:12.680 --> 01:22:18.680]  that should have barred him from acting as district attorney in this given case?
[01:22:18.680 --> 01:22:22.680]  Did the district attorney receive any consideration
[01:22:22.680 --> 01:22:29.680]  or anything of value from the estate?
[01:22:29.680 --> 01:22:31.680]  Well, that's yet to be determined.
[01:22:31.680 --> 01:22:37.680]  I believe that he said that he was signing an affidavit that he wasn't,
[01:22:37.680 --> 01:22:43.680]  but he was representing a client that had a vested interest or so we thought.
[01:22:43.680 --> 01:22:44.680]  Oh, wait, wait, wait, okay, okay.
[01:22:44.680 --> 01:22:49.680]  He was representing a client that had a vested interest
[01:22:49.680 --> 01:22:53.680]  and then he became a district attorney
[01:22:53.680 --> 01:22:58.680]  and this sounds like a civil issue that wouldn't have a district attorney.
[01:22:58.680 --> 01:23:03.680]  Well, for achievement, you have to get either a district attorney
[01:23:03.680 --> 01:23:04.680]  or the attorney general.
[01:23:04.680 --> 01:23:10.680]  You have to file your achievement claim with one of the two parties
[01:23:10.680 --> 01:23:14.680]  and, of course, that didn't happen in the first instance,
[01:23:14.680 --> 01:23:19.680]  so he was poured out or nullified for lack of jurisdiction.
[01:23:19.680 --> 01:23:22.680]  And he absolutely has a conflict of interest.
[01:23:22.680 --> 01:23:26.680]  Okay, another question is this client that he allegedly had
[01:23:26.680 --> 01:23:29.680]  before he took the district attorney's position,
[01:23:29.680 --> 01:23:33.680]  did he continue to represent this client after he became district attorney?
[01:23:33.680 --> 01:23:36.680]  Wait, wait, it makes no difference.
[01:23:36.680 --> 01:23:38.680]  Wait, wait, wait, it does make a difference.
[01:23:38.680 --> 01:23:39.680]  Let him answer the question.
[01:23:39.680 --> 01:23:40.680]  Okay.
[01:23:40.680 --> 01:23:45.680]  Sir, I can't answer that because I don't have all the facts on that matter,
[01:23:45.680 --> 01:23:49.680]  but in my career I have never seen anything like this.
[01:23:49.680 --> 01:23:51.680]  Okay, well, here's the issue.
[01:23:51.680 --> 01:23:54.680]  If he did, that is a strict no-no.
[01:23:54.680 --> 01:23:57.680]  The Constitution says the county and district attorneys
[01:23:57.680 --> 01:24:02.680]  may not engage in private practice when they fill that position, period.
[01:24:02.680 --> 01:24:07.680]  Well, if they can't while they're in that position,
[01:24:07.680 --> 01:24:11.680]  but even if he wasn't in that position,
[01:24:11.680 --> 01:24:17.680]  if he represented a client in this same issue,
[01:24:17.680 --> 01:24:22.680]  he can't come back as a district attorney
[01:24:22.680 --> 01:24:32.680]  and litigate the same issue involving a client for whom he was an attorney of record.
[01:24:32.680 --> 01:24:36.680]  He has a conflict of interest here.
[01:24:36.680 --> 01:24:40.680]  It seems like no matter how he goes around it, he has a conflict of interest.
[01:24:40.680 --> 01:24:43.680]  And I would suggest you go to the grand jury
[01:24:43.680 --> 01:24:52.680]  and accuse the prosecuting or the district attorney of conspiracy.
[01:24:52.680 --> 01:24:56.680]  I'd have to figure out exactly what he's...
[01:24:56.680 --> 01:24:57.680]  Conspiracy to defraud.
[01:24:57.680 --> 01:24:59.680]  Well, what's he going to do with the achievement?
[01:24:59.680 --> 01:25:03.680]  It doesn't go to his client, it goes to the state.
[01:25:03.680 --> 01:25:05.680]  Right, so he's representing the state.
[01:25:05.680 --> 01:25:10.680]  Yeah, so it's hard to find a way to get at him.
[01:25:10.680 --> 01:25:11.680]  Why is he doing this?
[01:25:11.680 --> 01:25:14.680]  He's got to have another reason.
[01:25:14.680 --> 01:25:19.680]  Well, when he first did it, there's been a lot of fraud and shenanigans going on.
[01:25:19.680 --> 01:25:22.680]  I don't know if you've ever had any experience in Robertson County,
[01:25:22.680 --> 01:25:29.680]  but it's quite renowned for these type of situations.
[01:25:29.680 --> 01:25:30.680]  Okay, wait, wait.
[01:25:30.680 --> 01:25:35.680]  I don't mean to sound humorous, but unfortunately,
[01:25:35.680 --> 01:25:42.680]  we hear this about not only every county in Texas, but everywhere I go.
[01:25:42.680 --> 01:25:44.680]  And this is a common thing for me to say.
[01:25:44.680 --> 01:25:47.680]  Everywhere I go, everybody says,
[01:25:47.680 --> 01:25:51.680]  well, my county is the most corrupt county in the state.
[01:25:51.680 --> 01:25:56.680]  Yeah, there's one exception to that, Williamson County.
[01:25:56.680 --> 01:26:01.680]  Everybody says in every other county that Williamson County is the most corrupt county.
[01:26:01.680 --> 01:26:02.680]  Yeah, that could be.
[01:26:02.680 --> 01:26:04.680]  That's the county just north of Austin.
[01:26:04.680 --> 01:26:09.680]  But this is a common thing, and then it's unfortunate to have to say that,
[01:26:09.680 --> 01:26:18.680]  because the public has clearly lost confidence in the criminal justice system and in the courts.
[01:26:18.680 --> 01:26:22.680]  But what I'm trying to figure out, and we're actually running out of time here.
[01:26:22.680 --> 01:26:23.680]  We have so many callers.
[01:26:23.680 --> 01:26:25.680]  We need to get to them.
[01:26:25.680 --> 01:26:26.680]  It's too complex.
[01:26:26.680 --> 01:26:28.680]  When you call back.
[01:26:28.680 --> 01:26:32.680]  My concern was that I was hopeful that when he had himself appointed
[01:26:32.680 --> 01:26:36.680]  that he was going to actually investigate like a district attorney should,
[01:26:36.680 --> 01:26:41.680]  but that's not what happened, and it was disappointing to see that.
[01:26:41.680 --> 01:26:44.680]  Then let me make a suggestion.
[01:26:44.680 --> 01:26:47.680]  File Bargreevitz against him.
[01:26:47.680 --> 01:26:48.680]  Pardon me?
[01:26:48.680 --> 01:26:55.680]  File Bargreevitz, accuse him of acting as an attorney for the state in a matter
[01:26:55.680 --> 01:27:04.680]  for which he was an attorney for one of the litigants in the issue.
[01:27:04.680 --> 01:27:05.680]  Okay.
[01:27:05.680 --> 01:27:07.680]  Bargreevitz will hurt him.
[01:27:07.680 --> 01:27:11.680]  So apparently he's not the elected prosecuting attorney.
[01:27:11.680 --> 01:27:14.680]  He had himself appointed for some special purpose.
[01:27:14.680 --> 01:27:15.680]  Yes, sir.
[01:27:15.680 --> 01:27:19.680]  And a bargreevitz will hurt him big time.
[01:27:19.680 --> 01:27:25.680]  And if you can get those folks who have an interest in the case to file a bargreevitz
[01:27:25.680 --> 01:27:31.680]  as well, you may eliminate his ability to practice.
[01:27:31.680 --> 01:27:34.680]  Okay, but it is still set a bad precedent.
[01:27:34.680 --> 01:27:35.680]  Oh, it'll hurt him.
[01:27:35.680 --> 01:27:38.680]  A bargreevitz will hurt him big time.
[01:27:38.680 --> 01:27:44.680]  And tomorrow we can talk about bargreevitzes and how they hurt the attorneys.
[01:27:44.680 --> 01:27:48.680]  A valid bargreevitz, an invalid bargreevitz doesn't make any difference.
[01:27:48.680 --> 01:27:49.680]  It's going to hurt him anyway.
[01:27:49.680 --> 01:27:52.680]  But we're used up almost in a whole other segment.
[01:27:52.680 --> 01:27:56.680]  Yeah, we need to move on because we were going to give you like another couple of minutes,
[01:27:56.680 --> 01:28:00.680]  and now another whole segment has gone by.
[01:28:00.680 --> 01:28:01.680]  Thank you for your time.
[01:28:01.680 --> 01:28:03.680]  Okay, call back in tomorrow, Rowdy.
[01:28:03.680 --> 01:28:04.680]  Thank you.
[01:28:04.680 --> 01:28:05.680]  Okay, thank you.
[01:28:05.680 --> 01:28:09.680]  All right, we're going to go now to another first-time caller, John in Texas.
[01:28:09.680 --> 01:28:10.680]  John, thanks for calling in.
[01:28:10.680 --> 01:28:11.680]  What is on your mind tonight?
[01:28:11.680 --> 01:28:14.680]  We'll hold you over from the break.
[01:28:14.680 --> 01:28:15.680]  Go ahead.
[01:28:15.680 --> 01:28:16.680]  Good evening.
[01:28:16.680 --> 01:28:20.680]  I wanted to know who I'd be addressing you to,
[01:28:20.680 --> 01:28:28.680]  but I recently got a ticket in Bandera County just outside San Antonio here,
[01:28:28.680 --> 01:28:38.680]  and I had filed a motion in late August as I normally do for tickets,
[01:28:38.680 --> 01:28:45.680]  and a motion of discovery and also filed a request for a speedy trial.
[01:28:45.680 --> 01:28:52.680]  Well, I had my first court appearance in early October,
[01:28:52.680 --> 01:28:53.680]  and when I came to the...
[01:28:53.680 --> 01:28:55.680]  How did you plead?
[01:28:55.680 --> 01:28:57.680]  Oh, I plead not guilty.
[01:28:57.680 --> 01:29:00.680]  Did you file a challenge to jurisdiction?
[01:29:00.680 --> 01:29:01.680]  I'm sorry?
[01:29:01.680 --> 01:29:07.680]  Did you file a challenge to the subject matter jurisdiction of the court?
[01:29:07.680 --> 01:29:08.680]  No, I didn't.
[01:29:08.680 --> 01:29:14.680]  I suppose I have another method that's worked for me in the past.
[01:29:14.680 --> 01:29:15.680]  Okay, good.
[01:29:15.680 --> 01:29:17.680]  We're going to go to break it shortly,
[01:29:17.680 --> 01:29:22.680]  but this will probably be something we're going to want to address tomorrow
[01:29:22.680 --> 01:29:26.680]  if you can call in because we've got four hours tomorrow.
[01:29:26.680 --> 01:29:27.680]  Okay.
[01:29:27.680 --> 01:29:34.680]  You've got Eddie Craig here who is the traffic ticket guru.
[01:29:34.680 --> 01:29:36.680]  He will give you so many tools you won't believe it,
[01:29:36.680 --> 01:29:39.680]  and we would very much like to hear what you do.
[01:29:39.680 --> 01:29:40.680]  We'll come back on the other side.
[01:29:40.680 --> 01:29:41.680]  Yeah, come back.
[01:29:41.680 --> 01:29:42.680]  Stay there, John.
[01:29:42.680 --> 01:29:43.680]  Yeah, stay there.
[01:29:43.680 --> 01:29:44.680]  Okay.
[01:29:44.680 --> 01:29:45.680]  But we don't want to spend too much time.
[01:29:45.680 --> 01:29:46.680]  We've got so many callers.
[01:29:46.680 --> 01:29:47.680]  We don't want to cut them off.
[01:29:47.680 --> 01:29:48.680]  I'd really like you to call back tomorrow.
[01:29:48.680 --> 01:29:49.680]  Okay, stay there.
[01:29:49.680 --> 01:29:50.680]  Okay, hold on.
[01:29:50.680 --> 01:29:51.680]  We've got 10 seconds.
[01:29:51.680 --> 01:29:52.680]  Stay there.
[01:29:52.680 --> 01:29:53.680]  We have to go to break.
[01:29:53.680 --> 01:29:54.680]  We'll be right back, folks.
[01:29:54.680 --> 01:29:55.680]  This is Randy Kelton, Debra Craig.
[01:29:55.680 --> 01:29:56.680]  This is Eddie Craig.
[01:29:56.680 --> 01:29:59.680]  We'll be right back.
[01:29:59.680 --> 01:30:02.680]  Top 10 reasons to question the official story of the Oklahoma City bombing,
[01:30:02.680 --> 01:30:03.680]  reason number five.
[01:30:03.680 --> 01:30:07.680]  As witnessed by millions of viewers, the rescue efforts were interrupted several times
[01:30:07.680 --> 01:30:09.680]  due to the presence of other explosives.
[01:30:09.680 --> 01:30:14.680]  Government log entries indicate and witnesses report that after the initial devastating blast,
[01:30:14.680 --> 01:30:18.680]  a bomb complete with timer was discovered and removed from wreckage by the bomb squad.
[01:30:18.680 --> 01:30:22.680]  Yet we are told it's all due to baseless bomb scares or other contravences.
[01:30:22.680 --> 01:30:26.680]  So while officials try to sort out their stories, all we ask is who planted these bombs
[01:30:26.680 --> 01:30:28.680]  and why is the government lying about them?
[01:30:28.680 --> 01:30:33.680]  For more information, go to okcbombingtruth.com.
[01:30:33.680 --> 01:30:34.680]  Stop right there, young man.
[01:30:34.680 --> 01:30:35.680]  Are your hands clean?
[01:30:35.680 --> 01:30:39.680]  Crazy as it sounds, researchers have been lurking in public restrooms spying on people
[01:30:39.680 --> 01:30:42.680]  to make sure they wash their hands after using the facilities.
[01:30:42.680 --> 01:30:47.680]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be back in a moment to share their findings.
[01:30:47.680 --> 01:30:49.680]  Privacy is under attack.
[01:30:49.680 --> 01:30:52.680]  When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again.
[01:30:52.680 --> 01:30:57.680]  And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too.
[01:30:57.680 --> 01:31:02.680]  So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself.
[01:31:02.680 --> 01:31:05.680]  Privacy, it's worth hanging on to.
[01:31:05.680 --> 01:31:08.680]  This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com,
[01:31:08.680 --> 01:31:12.680]  the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing.
[01:31:12.680 --> 01:31:16.680]  Start over with StartPage.
[01:31:16.680 --> 01:31:19.680]  Researchers recently staked out public restrooms in four U.S. cities
[01:31:19.680 --> 01:31:23.680]  and found that only 15 percent of us failed to wash our hands before leaving.
[01:31:23.680 --> 01:31:28.680]  That's not bad compared to 2007 when nearly a quarter of people failed to address their hand hygiene.
[01:31:28.680 --> 01:31:33.680]  Women were the cleaner sex with 93 percent washing up compared to just 77 percent of men.
[01:31:33.680 --> 01:31:37.680]  Although statistics could use some improvement, I found the thought of people spending hours
[01:31:37.680 --> 01:31:42.680]  in dirty bathrooms watching and waiting while the rest of us go about our business downright bizarre.
[01:31:42.680 --> 01:31:45.680]  Yes, it's important to wash your hands before leaving the bathroom
[01:31:45.680 --> 01:31:50.680]  because it helps prevent the spread of disease, not because the bathroom police are watching.
[01:31:50.680 --> 01:31:55.680]  I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com.
[01:32:20.680 --> 01:32:49.680]  Okay, we are back folks.
[01:32:49.680 --> 01:32:52.680]  Are you taking your calls?
[01:32:52.680 --> 01:32:55.680]  We're talking right now with John in Texas.
[01:32:55.680 --> 01:32:58.680]  Okay, John, go ahead.
[01:32:58.680 --> 01:33:10.680]  Okay, so my question was I had filed for a speed trial, and again that was in late August.
[01:33:10.680 --> 01:33:12.680]  And when I had my...
[01:33:12.680 --> 01:33:15.680]  Just one second, John, you're not on a speaker phone, are you?
[01:33:15.680 --> 01:33:16.680]  No.
[01:33:16.680 --> 01:33:18.680]  Okay, all right, go ahead.
[01:33:18.680 --> 01:33:28.680]  When I had my first court appearance, I spoke to the prosecutor and requested a jury trial.
[01:33:28.680 --> 01:33:32.680]  And then I went before the judge just to verify that.
[01:33:32.680 --> 01:33:37.680]  And the judge said I'd probably get a court date sometime in May or June.
[01:33:37.680 --> 01:33:42.680]  And I asked the judge, I said, well, John, I requested a speedy trial.
[01:33:42.680 --> 01:33:46.680]  And he kind of leaned back in his chair and said, well, it's a speedy trial.
[01:33:46.680 --> 01:33:48.680]  Most people don't understand it, blah, blah, blah.
[01:33:48.680 --> 01:33:53.680]  It really has to do with getting me to this stage.
[01:33:53.680 --> 01:34:01.680]  We just can't sit on this, you know, on these files and so forth.
[01:34:01.680 --> 01:34:08.680]  My question to you, whoever, is does this speedy trial really mean from the date that you file
[01:34:08.680 --> 01:34:14.680]  that you should have your court date within 90 days?
[01:34:14.680 --> 01:34:17.680]  There is not a set number of days.
[01:34:17.680 --> 01:34:22.680]  It all depends upon what the dockets and everything else look like.
[01:34:22.680 --> 01:34:29.680]  From what I've seen of the case law, there are judges that say that you've got this many days.
[01:34:29.680 --> 01:34:32.680]  There are judges that say you've got this many years.
[01:34:32.680 --> 01:34:39.680]  Texas law says they have up to two years to even file the complaint against you and get you to trial.
[01:34:39.680 --> 01:34:46.680]  However, once the prosecution process has begun, the speedy trial clock starts counting down.
[01:34:46.680 --> 01:34:49.680]  Okay, here's the problem.
[01:34:49.680 --> 01:35:00.680]  3202A, that was the Code of Criminal Procedure statute that said that a Class C misdemeanor
[01:35:00.680 --> 01:35:06.680]  must be brought to trial within, I think, 30 days.
[01:35:06.680 --> 01:35:17.680]  Problem is 3202A has been repealed as being unconstitutional as it required,
[01:35:17.680 --> 01:35:25.680]  it mandated a judicial decision of dismissal if the case was not brought within that time limit.
[01:35:25.680 --> 01:35:35.680]  And what the judiciary complained about is the legislature had no authority to mandated judicial decision.
[01:35:35.680 --> 01:35:38.680]  So it was overturned as being unconstitutional.
[01:35:38.680 --> 01:35:48.680]  And the traffic courts has taken that to mean that the constitutional right to a speedy trial has been repealed.
[01:35:48.680 --> 01:35:51.680]  But it has not.
[01:35:51.680 --> 01:36:05.680]  So what we have to argue is that the legislative intent that the definition of speedy was contained within 3202A,
[01:36:05.680 --> 01:36:14.680]  I'm sorry, with 60 days Class C misdemeanor, 90 Class B, 120 Class A, 180 felony,
[01:36:14.680 --> 01:36:21.680]  that those time limits are still valid as legislative intent.
[01:36:21.680 --> 01:36:33.680]  The courts, the municipal courts want to say speedy trial right just does not matter
[01:36:33.680 --> 01:36:39.680]  because the speedy trial act implementing the right was overturned.
[01:36:39.680 --> 01:36:42.680]  This is a difficult issue.
[01:36:42.680 --> 01:36:46.680]  And if we're going to get it fixed, we have to make the right argument.
[01:36:46.680 --> 01:36:47.680]  Right.
[01:36:47.680 --> 01:36:52.680]  But now my first question is, is what is this process you're using if you can tell us very shortly
[01:36:52.680 --> 01:37:00.680]  because from what I've seen, you should have never gotten this far to have to even worry about a speedy trial.
[01:37:00.680 --> 01:37:08.680]  Well, let me just say real quick, a friend of mine, mutual friend, Richard Reeves, turned me on to the program.
[01:37:08.680 --> 01:37:11.680]  So I've just been listening to you guys now for a couple of weeks.
[01:37:11.680 --> 01:37:13.680]  The Richard Reeves?
[01:37:13.680 --> 01:37:16.680]  Yeah, Richard Reeves.
[01:37:16.680 --> 01:37:17.680]  And I'm definitely hooked.
[01:37:17.680 --> 01:37:23.680]  And I know I've heard just a little bit about the method you use, so that's great.
[01:37:23.680 --> 01:37:27.680]  And I'm anxious to maybe learn more about it.
[01:37:27.680 --> 01:37:33.680]  The method that I used was given to me by my cousin who's used it over 100 times.
[01:37:33.680 --> 01:37:35.680]  She got it from a retired judge.
[01:37:35.680 --> 01:37:39.680]  But the motion is, it's two sentences.
[01:37:39.680 --> 01:37:43.680]  I hereby request all documentation regarding the legal annexation of the Republic of Texas
[01:37:43.680 --> 01:37:45.680]  and all documents thereof.
[01:37:45.680 --> 01:37:51.680]  Well, I've already had success for myself.
[01:37:51.680 --> 01:37:52.680]  This is my third...
[01:37:52.680 --> 01:37:53.680]  Wait, wait, wait, wait.
[01:37:53.680 --> 01:37:55.680]  Back up a little bit.
[01:37:55.680 --> 01:38:01.680]  He's requesting all of the documents concerning the legal annexation of the State of Texas?
[01:38:01.680 --> 01:38:03.680]  No, the Republic of Texas.
[01:38:03.680 --> 01:38:05.680]  I'm sorry, the Republic of Texas.
[01:38:05.680 --> 01:38:06.680]  Yes, sir.
[01:38:06.680 --> 01:38:12.680]  And I've won two cases for myself.
[01:38:12.680 --> 01:38:14.680]  This is my third.
[01:38:14.680 --> 01:38:19.680]  And I've already got nine for friends and family members.
[01:38:19.680 --> 01:38:21.680]  And they all just get dismissed outright.
[01:38:21.680 --> 01:38:25.680]  Now, my cousin has actually beaten this over 100 times.
[01:38:25.680 --> 01:38:26.680]  He's retired.
[01:38:26.680 --> 01:38:27.680]  This is all he does.
[01:38:27.680 --> 01:38:30.680]  He loves to get into court and do his thing.
[01:38:30.680 --> 01:38:35.680]  And he's had to argue with a few prosecutors, but it always gets dismissed.
[01:38:35.680 --> 01:38:36.680]  Okay.
[01:38:36.680 --> 01:38:38.680]  This is intriguing.
[01:38:38.680 --> 01:38:39.680]  Yep.
[01:38:39.680 --> 01:38:47.680]  Is this going to some issue as to the fact that the State of Texas was never actually
[01:38:47.680 --> 01:38:50.680]  properly annexed as a state?
[01:38:50.680 --> 01:38:51.680]  That's correct.
[01:38:51.680 --> 01:38:52.680]  That's correct.
[01:38:52.680 --> 01:38:57.680]  And, you know, I can make the argument, you can go to Austin there in the Capitol building
[01:38:57.680 --> 01:39:02.680]  and you see everywhere there, inside the Capitol building, only you see the seal of the Republic of Texas.
[01:39:02.680 --> 01:39:07.680]  All these courtrooms and everywhere else you see the seal of the State of Texas.
[01:39:07.680 --> 01:39:13.680]  But anyway, I am still not, you know, I was just, I didn't believe my own cousin.
[01:39:13.680 --> 01:39:16.680]  This was about 13 years ago when he first told me about it.
[01:39:16.680 --> 01:39:17.680]  And I put it off and put it off.
[01:39:17.680 --> 01:39:22.680]  And of course, as we see enforcement just going wild now, about two and a half years ago,
[01:39:22.680 --> 01:39:24.680]  I finally put it to the test.
[01:39:24.680 --> 01:39:29.680]  And to be honest with you, I didn't believe my own cousin, but he just keeps winning and winning.
[01:39:29.680 --> 01:39:33.680]  And of course, he's got a lot of brothers and he's got kids and he's gotten all of them off.
[01:39:33.680 --> 01:39:37.680]  We'd like to see some of these cases, like case numbers or something.
[01:39:37.680 --> 01:39:38.680]  Sure.
[01:39:38.680 --> 01:39:40.680]  I'm happy to show you my stuff.
[01:39:40.680 --> 01:39:41.680]  Wait, wait, wait, stop, stop, stop.
[01:39:41.680 --> 01:39:49.680]  How familiar are you, how familiar are you with this specific argument that's being made or pointed to?
[01:39:49.680 --> 01:39:52.680]  Well, you know, I'm a native Texan.
[01:39:52.680 --> 01:39:54.680]  We all had our one year of Texas history.
[01:39:54.680 --> 01:40:06.680]  I tried to study it and I guess, you know, maybe some of it has to do with the actual military occupation of Texas,
[01:40:06.680 --> 01:40:11.680]  you know, I think after the Civil War.
[01:40:11.680 --> 01:40:16.680]  Yeah, this is an issue that I find very interesting.
[01:40:16.680 --> 01:40:27.680]  I have a friend who claims that any objection to the fact that the Republic of Texas is a part of the United States
[01:40:27.680 --> 01:40:36.680]  was overridden by the Civil War as the Republic of Texas became the spoils of war.
[01:40:36.680 --> 01:40:37.680]  Right.
[01:40:37.680 --> 01:40:49.680]  Well, you know, again, I'm not an expert and I'll show you my dismissals and, you know, so far,
[01:40:49.680 --> 01:40:54.680]  I mean, I can refer you to my niece's boyfriend that I got off.
[01:40:54.680 --> 01:40:59.680]  I've gotten my boss off of a ticket and I've showed a woman at work how to do it
[01:40:59.680 --> 01:41:05.680]  and I've shown a few others and it works every time and they seem to run from it.
[01:41:05.680 --> 01:41:06.680]  You certainly have.
[01:41:06.680 --> 01:41:08.680]  And believe me, this is...
[01:41:08.680 --> 01:41:20.680]  Okay, let me explain why this intrigues me because most of the municipal judges I know are incredibly incompetent
[01:41:20.680 --> 01:41:25.680]  and you're talking about an issue that's very sophisticated.
[01:41:25.680 --> 01:41:28.680]  Well, but from what he's saying, it's not the judge that makes the determination.
[01:41:28.680 --> 01:41:32.680]  He accosts the prosecutor with it and the prosecutor requests the dismissal.
[01:41:32.680 --> 01:41:35.680]  Yeah, but the prosecutors are even more incompetent.
[01:41:35.680 --> 01:41:36.680]  Well, that's a whole other story.
[01:41:36.680 --> 01:41:38.680]  So how do they get this sophisticated?
[01:41:38.680 --> 01:41:39.680]  We'll see.
[01:41:39.680 --> 01:41:40.680]  Look, this is...
[01:41:40.680 --> 01:41:41.680]  Wait, wait, wait.
[01:41:41.680 --> 01:41:42.680]  There's a key here.
[01:41:42.680 --> 01:41:49.680]  Yeah, and I'm going to tell you what the key might be because this is what I've seen regarding this uppercase,
[01:41:49.680 --> 01:41:53.680]  lowercase stuff and some of these filing liens on these public officials.
[01:41:53.680 --> 01:41:57.680]  It's not so much that the argument itself is so valid.
[01:41:57.680 --> 01:42:02.680]  It's just that these low-level prosecutors and municipal judges are incompetent
[01:42:02.680 --> 01:42:06.680]  and they just don't want to have to deal with researching the issue out,
[01:42:06.680 --> 01:42:09.680]  so they just dismiss the case just because it's too much trouble to deal with.
[01:42:09.680 --> 01:42:13.680]  That doesn't necessarily mean that the argument itself is valid.
[01:42:13.680 --> 01:42:14.680]  Well...
[01:42:13.680 --> 01:42:14.680]  Good point.
[01:42:14.680 --> 01:42:19.680]  And now, Debra, I've actually thought about myself and one of the things I can say is like, you know,
[01:42:19.680 --> 01:42:23.680]  certainly, you know, when I tell people and I've gotten friends or family off and I say,
[01:42:23.680 --> 01:42:27.680]  hey, listen, don't think you can use this from bank robbery or murder, okay,
[01:42:27.680 --> 01:42:32.680]  but at least for a traffic ticket and possibly misdemeanors,
[01:42:32.680 --> 01:42:35.680]  my cousin who's been doing this for over 13 years,
[01:42:35.680 --> 01:42:39.680]  he lives in a little township here on the northeast side of San Antonio called Windcrest.
[01:42:39.680 --> 01:42:41.680]  Well, actually, he lives on the other side of it and there's 20 little towns
[01:42:41.680 --> 01:42:43.680]  and the speed limits are all 20 miles an hour.
[01:42:43.680 --> 01:42:45.680]  They'll give you a ticket for going 21.
[01:42:45.680 --> 01:42:49.680]  And he lived east of that, so he always had to cross through Windcrest to get into San Antonio
[01:42:49.680 --> 01:42:52.680]  and cross through Windcrest to get back home.
[01:42:52.680 --> 01:42:54.680]  So he got frustrated.
[01:42:54.680 --> 01:42:58.680]  He was acquainted with a retired judge that told him, try this,
[01:42:58.680 --> 01:43:03.680]  and he's been doing it and he just loves smoking in court.
[01:43:03.680 --> 01:43:06.680]  And I've considered both those.
[01:43:06.680 --> 01:43:08.680]  I mean, again, I'm open-minded.
[01:43:08.680 --> 01:43:11.680]  You guys know what really works, why it works, but I can...
[01:43:11.680 --> 01:43:12.680]  And I have thought about it.
[01:43:12.680 --> 01:43:15.680]  You know, they have to probably come to the mountain of documentation.
[01:43:15.680 --> 01:43:16.680]  They're just too lazy to do that.
[01:43:16.680 --> 01:43:20.680]  And so they have to answer it somehow and they just do it by dismissing it.
[01:43:20.680 --> 01:43:25.680]  But I'd be more than happy to show, I keep all my documentation
[01:43:25.680 --> 01:43:30.680]  and, you know, if you guys got a fact or something, I can send it to you
[01:43:30.680 --> 01:43:32.680]  and I'd be more than happy to show it to you.
[01:43:32.680 --> 01:43:33.680]  And it's real simple.
[01:43:33.680 --> 01:43:37.680]  I just explain really the wording, it's two sentences,
[01:43:37.680 --> 01:43:39.680]  and I just file that with a speedy trial.
[01:43:39.680 --> 01:43:40.680]  All right, great.
[01:43:40.680 --> 01:43:41.680]  This is Eddie.
[01:43:41.680 --> 01:43:42.680]  Do me a favor and send me an email.
[01:43:42.680 --> 01:43:46.680]  Just either email me the motion you do or something and let me take a look at it.
[01:43:46.680 --> 01:43:50.680]  And I've got a lot of information on what you're talking about on this
[01:43:50.680 --> 01:43:51.680]  and on Lincoln's setup of this.
[01:43:51.680 --> 01:43:53.680]  Okay, we got to go to break.
[01:43:53.680 --> 01:43:56.680]  John, you can call back in tomorrow night.
[01:43:56.680 --> 01:43:58.680]  We'll be right back, folks.
[01:44:00.680 --> 01:44:01.680]  More energy.
[01:44:01.680 --> 01:44:03.680]  Stronger immune power.
[01:44:03.680 --> 01:44:06.680]  Improved sense of well-being.
[01:44:06.680 --> 01:44:10.680]  How many supplements have you heard boast of these benefits?
[01:44:10.680 --> 01:44:16.680]  The team behind Centrition believes that supplements should over-deliver on their promises.
[01:44:16.680 --> 01:44:19.680]  And Centrition does just that.
[01:44:19.680 --> 01:44:24.680]  Centrition utilizes the ancient healing wisdom of Chinese medicine.
[01:44:24.680 --> 01:44:27.680]  In conjunction with the science of modern nutrition,
[01:44:27.680 --> 01:44:30.680]  adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing component,
[01:44:30.680 --> 01:44:36.680]  and organic hemp protein in greens and superfoods act as a balanced nutrient base.
[01:44:36.680 --> 01:44:40.680]  Plus, Centrition tastes great in just water.
[01:44:40.680 --> 01:44:46.680]  This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product, and it's all natural.
[01:44:46.680 --> 01:44:54.680]  Visit Centrition.com to order yours or call 1-866-497-7436.
[01:44:54.680 --> 01:44:59.680]  After you use Centrition, you'll believe in supplements again.
[01:44:59.680 --> 01:45:02.680]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:45:02.680 --> 01:45:06.680]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[01:45:06.680 --> 01:45:14.680]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[01:45:14.680 --> 01:45:18.680]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:45:18.680 --> 01:45:21.680]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:45:21.680 --> 01:45:26.680]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can, too.
[01:45:26.680 --> 01:45:33.680]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[01:45:33.680 --> 01:45:37.680]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:45:37.680 --> 01:45:42.680]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[01:45:42.680 --> 01:45:48.680]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:45:48.680 --> 01:45:51.680]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:45:51.680 --> 01:45:55.680]  Please visit RuleOfLawRadio.com and click on the banner
[01:45:55.680 --> 01:45:59.680]  or call toll-free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:45:59.680 --> 01:46:27.680]  Okay, folks, we're taking your calls.
[01:46:27.680 --> 01:46:30.680]  We've got one segment left.
[01:46:30.680 --> 01:46:33.680]  We're going now to Mark in Wisconsin.
[01:46:33.680 --> 01:46:35.680]  Mark, thanks for calling in.
[01:46:35.680 --> 01:46:37.680]  What is on your mind tonight?
[01:46:37.680 --> 01:46:45.680]  Actually, this is Susan in Indonesia, but I wanted to thank Eddie Craig for emailing me back.
[01:46:45.680 --> 01:46:47.680]  And I had a question.
[01:46:47.680 --> 01:46:53.680]  I'm putting together a grand jury indictment or actually just collecting evidence on it right now.
[01:46:53.680 --> 01:47:00.680]  And I've got a police chief where I found on the municipal code that he was to deliver suspects
[01:47:00.680 --> 01:47:08.680]  for disorderly conduct to the state circuit court, and he's been putting them in his own court.
[01:47:08.680 --> 01:47:13.680]  Now, does it make any sense to do an open records request to see what the breakdown is
[01:47:13.680 --> 01:47:17.680]  on how much he's getting paid for all these disorderly conduct charges
[01:47:17.680 --> 01:47:21.680]  for the purposes of accusing him for stealing from the state?
[01:47:21.680 --> 01:47:25.680]  Absolutely, and that would go to QUITAM.
[01:47:25.680 --> 01:47:27.680]  That was my second question.
[01:47:27.680 --> 01:47:34.680]  Do you guys have a good example of a QUITAM Quo Warento removal?
[01:47:34.680 --> 01:47:38.680]  Well, that's going to be applicable to what the state statutes in your area
[01:47:38.680 --> 01:47:41.680]  say the requisites for a QUITAM and a Quo Warento are.
[01:47:41.680 --> 01:47:42.680]  Okay, wait, wait.
[01:47:42.680 --> 01:47:45.680]  Let's break Quo Warento and QUITAM apart.
[01:47:45.680 --> 01:47:46.680]  They're not the same.
[01:47:46.680 --> 01:47:47.680]  I know that.
[01:47:47.680 --> 01:47:48.680]  That's why I said and.
[01:47:48.680 --> 01:47:50.680]  Yeah, okay.
[01:47:50.680 --> 01:47:59.680]  QUITAM, if the chief of police is misappropriating funds
[01:47:59.680 --> 01:48:07.680]  or is running a scam to where instead of taking the accused to the proper jurisdiction,
[01:48:07.680 --> 01:48:11.680]  is taking them to his own jurisdiction,
[01:48:11.680 --> 01:48:17.680]  where he subsequently receives some type of consideration,
[01:48:17.680 --> 01:48:22.680]  then you have more than just QUO Warento.
[01:48:22.680 --> 01:48:23.680]  I'd have to look at it,
[01:48:23.680 --> 01:48:31.680]  but it would seem like that would get into a lot of fraud and due process issues.
[01:48:31.680 --> 01:48:35.680]  Plus it would mean the court that's hearing the action would lack jurisdiction,
[01:48:35.680 --> 01:48:40.680]  which all their actions would then be subject to appeal for overturning as void.
[01:48:40.680 --> 01:48:42.680]  Yeah, there would be a nullity.
[01:48:42.680 --> 01:48:46.680]  That goes to QUITAM, the misappropriation of funds.
[01:48:46.680 --> 01:48:56.680]  But if he did that, then, and he did it improperly, that would go to QUO Warento.
[01:48:56.680 --> 01:49:03.680]  QUO Warento is where a public official has performed some act
[01:49:03.680 --> 01:49:07.680]  that subjects him to removal from office.
[01:49:07.680 --> 01:49:14.680]  And most states have some sort of QUO Warento removal provisions.
[01:49:14.680 --> 01:49:20.680]  Like, you know, when I talk about if a public official is indicted,
[01:49:20.680 --> 01:49:25.680]  like I'm trying to get, I'm going to try to get Judge Dietz indicted.
[01:49:25.680 --> 01:49:30.680]  If I get the indictment, the indictment is not a conviction.
[01:49:30.680 --> 01:49:32.680]  It's just an accusation.
[01:49:32.680 --> 01:49:35.680]  But if I get him indicted,
[01:49:35.680 --> 01:49:41.680]  the government code of taxes requires that under the QUO Warento provision
[01:49:41.680 --> 01:49:46.680]  that he be removed from office immediately.
[01:49:46.680 --> 01:49:50.680]  So I'm just trying to make the distinction between the differences,
[01:49:50.680 --> 01:49:53.680]  the differences between QUO Warento and QUO Warento.
[01:49:53.680 --> 01:49:54.680]  Do me a favor.
[01:49:54.680 --> 01:50:01.680]  Read Randy the definition of disorderly conduct in Wisconsin, will you please?
[01:50:01.680 --> 01:50:04.680]  My computer actually crashed today.
[01:50:04.680 --> 01:50:05.680]  Uh-oh.
[01:50:05.680 --> 01:50:07.680]  The hard drive caught on fire.
[01:50:07.680 --> 01:50:09.680]  Well, that's not a good thing.
[01:50:09.680 --> 01:50:14.680]  Did you do a smoke test?
[01:50:14.680 --> 01:50:17.680]  Actually, it includes a loud and boisterous,
[01:50:17.680 --> 01:50:20.680]  some sort of activity that might disturb someone.
[01:50:20.680 --> 01:50:24.680]  And it gets real ambiguous after that.
[01:50:24.680 --> 01:50:25.680]  You know that, Eddie.
[01:50:25.680 --> 01:50:26.680]  Yeah, that's what I was saying.
[01:50:26.680 --> 01:50:33.680]  It actually uses the term, let's see, this is Michael, right?
[01:50:33.680 --> 01:50:34.680]  Mark.
[01:50:34.680 --> 01:50:35.680]  Or Mark.
[01:50:35.680 --> 01:50:36.680]  Actually.
[01:50:36.680 --> 01:50:40.680]  I'm trying to find the email I sent to you.
[01:50:40.680 --> 01:50:43.680]  Oh, that's Joe Mama.
[01:50:43.680 --> 01:50:44.680]  Joe Mama.
[01:50:44.680 --> 01:50:45.680]  Okay, there we go.
[01:50:45.680 --> 01:50:46.680]  Madison Five.
[01:50:46.680 --> 01:50:47.680]  There we go.
[01:50:47.680 --> 01:50:48.680]  All right.
[01:50:48.680 --> 01:50:51.680]  This is the definition, Randy, of disorderly conduct in Wisconsin.
[01:50:51.680 --> 01:50:56.680]  Whoever in a public or private place engages in violent, abusive, indecent,
[01:50:56.680 --> 01:51:01.680]  profane, boisterous, unreasonably loud, or otherwise disorderly conduct.
[01:51:01.680 --> 01:51:06.680]  They're defining disorderly conduct with the term disorderly conduct.
[01:51:06.680 --> 01:51:10.680]  Under circumstances in which the conduct tends to cause or provoke a
[01:51:10.680 --> 01:51:14.680]  disturbance is guilty of a class B misdemeanor.
[01:51:14.680 --> 01:51:18.680]  Now, that's what they're trying to charge these five guys in Wisconsin with
[01:51:18.680 --> 01:51:22.680]  that carried into the, open carried into the restaurant.
[01:51:22.680 --> 01:51:28.680]  But I told him that if it was me, I would go directly after this statute for
[01:51:28.680 --> 01:51:34.680]  being vague and ambiguous and over broad in its application simply because it
[01:51:34.680 --> 01:51:38.680]  uses its own terms to define itself.
[01:51:38.680 --> 01:51:44.680]  It makes no clarification as to what the degree of anything is required or
[01:51:44.680 --> 01:51:50.680]  exactly what otherwise disorderly conduct would include or entail.
[01:51:50.680 --> 01:51:54.680]  Another interesting twist here, Eddie, is they have a municipal code for the
[01:51:54.680 --> 01:51:59.680]  city of Madison that says you can't open carry a gun when the Constitution and
[01:51:59.680 --> 01:52:02.680]  the Attorney General say you can.
[01:52:02.680 --> 01:52:06.680]  Right, and that ordinance should be challenged as unconstitutional in
[01:52:06.680 --> 01:52:08.680]  violation of state law.
[01:52:08.680 --> 01:52:12.680]  Actually, not only should it be unconstitutional, but whatever moron passed,
[01:52:12.680 --> 01:52:17.680]  it should be thrown out of office on another quote, warrant, or removal action.
[01:52:17.680 --> 01:52:20.680]  They should be in jail.
[01:52:20.680 --> 01:52:22.680]  Well, there's no way I can say that.
[01:52:22.680 --> 01:52:25.680]  Absolutely, they should be in jail.
[01:52:25.680 --> 01:52:28.680]  Yeah, that's what you go to the grand jury for.
[01:52:28.680 --> 01:52:34.680]  Coins, Virginia, 1821, still good law.
[01:52:34.680 --> 01:52:39.680]  These are individuals who are attempting to take jurisdiction where they don't
[01:52:39.680 --> 01:52:45.680]  have jurisdiction, where they're taking jurisdiction to limit your rights when
[01:52:45.680 --> 01:52:47.680]  they don't have that jurisdiction.
[01:52:47.680 --> 01:52:52.680]  And in Coins, Virginia, they call that treason to the Constitution.
[01:52:52.680 --> 01:52:59.680]  And they cannot for any reason enact a city ordinance that violates state law
[01:52:59.680 --> 01:53:03.680]  or the Constitution of the state.
[01:53:03.680 --> 01:53:09.680]  Such an ordinance would be void from its inception.
[01:53:09.680 --> 01:53:15.680]  And it can't be presumed that these public officials who are attempting to
[01:53:15.680 --> 01:53:21.680]  enforce an invalid ordinance are somehow ignorant of the fact that it's invalid.
[01:53:21.680 --> 01:53:22.680]  That's right.
[01:53:22.680 --> 01:53:27.680]  Hang on, I got a case you're going to love because this specifically says that
[01:53:27.680 --> 01:53:33.680]  any ministerial officer that attempts to enforce an unconstitutional statute,
[01:53:33.680 --> 01:53:38.680]  here we go, an unconstitutional statute affords no protection to a ministerial
[01:53:38.680 --> 01:53:41.680]  officer acting in pursuance thereof.
[01:53:41.680 --> 01:53:53.680]  That is Worsham v. Votsberger, that is Texas from 1910, 129, Southwest, 157.
[01:53:53.680 --> 01:53:54.680]  Wonderful.
[01:53:54.680 --> 01:53:57.680]  Have you shepardized that?
[01:53:57.680 --> 01:53:58.680]  Of course not.
[01:53:58.680 --> 01:53:59.680]  That's your job.
[01:53:59.680 --> 01:54:00.680]  I find them.
[01:54:00.680 --> 01:54:04.680]  You verify them.
[01:54:04.680 --> 01:54:05.680]  Okay.
[01:54:05.680 --> 01:54:06.680]  I just got choked.
[01:54:06.680 --> 01:54:10.680]  So my ultimate goal here, and I don't know if it's the right one, is I'd like
[01:54:10.680 --> 01:54:15.680]  to get this chief removed or get a severe black eye because he's allowing himself
[01:54:15.680 --> 01:54:22.680]  to be used as an instrument for what I believe are Ewan agendas.
[01:54:22.680 --> 01:54:24.680]  Well, who is using him?
[01:54:24.680 --> 01:54:29.680]  From the way this story went down, this is all his agenda.
[01:54:29.680 --> 01:54:33.680]  Well, I tend to believe that these people who may get to the higher ranks of
[01:54:33.680 --> 01:54:40.680]  police departments are put there because they have an agenda.
[01:54:40.680 --> 01:54:41.680]  Well, here's the thing.
[01:54:41.680 --> 01:54:45.680]  I don't know how it works in Wisconsin, but I know how it works in Texas.
[01:54:45.680 --> 01:54:51.680]  That chief of police is appointed by the mayor and the city manager.
[01:54:51.680 --> 01:54:55.680]  You need to find out who appoints the police chief in Wisconsin.
[01:54:55.680 --> 01:54:58.680]  And you need to go to them in droves as citizens.
[01:54:58.680 --> 01:55:01.680]  Here's my position.
[01:55:01.680 --> 01:55:08.680]  The only person who works for me in a public office is the director of the
[01:55:08.680 --> 01:55:09.680]  office.
[01:55:09.680 --> 01:55:12.680]  In this case, it's the mayor.
[01:55:12.680 --> 01:55:19.680]  If the police chief does anything that is illegal and improper, I must
[01:55:19.680 --> 01:55:26.680]  presume that the mayor specifically directed him to do so as respondeet
[01:55:26.680 --> 01:55:31.680]  is superior, respondeet, not respondent.
[01:55:31.680 --> 01:55:35.680]  It's respondeat.
[01:55:35.680 --> 01:55:38.680]  The only guy who works for me is the director.
[01:55:38.680 --> 01:55:43.680]  All the people who work under him work at his behest and under his direction.
[01:55:43.680 --> 01:55:49.680]  So if they commit criminal acts or improper acts, they do it in the persona
[01:55:49.680 --> 01:55:52.680]  of the director.
[01:55:52.680 --> 01:55:57.680]  The director of the Department of Public Safety used to recognize my voice.
[01:55:57.680 --> 01:56:02.680]  And, Randy, listen, we only have three minutes left, and if we're done with
[01:56:02.680 --> 01:56:04.680]  Mark, I wanted to try to take...
[01:56:04.680 --> 01:56:06.680]  Oh, well, he just dropped off the line.
[01:56:06.680 --> 01:56:07.680]  Yeah, let's dump Mark.
[01:56:07.680 --> 01:56:09.680]  He's a naked chump anyway.
[01:56:09.680 --> 01:56:10.680]  It's too late.
[01:56:10.680 --> 01:56:12.680]  We just lost the other caller that I wanted to take.
[01:56:12.680 --> 01:56:14.680]  So go ahead.
[01:56:14.680 --> 01:56:16.680]  That's what I was trying to tell you, that we're running out of time.
[01:56:16.680 --> 01:56:17.680]  Okay.
[01:56:17.680 --> 01:56:19.680]  That would be Del from Florida?
[01:56:19.680 --> 01:56:22.680]  No, there was someone from Michigan that I wanted to talk to.
[01:56:22.680 --> 01:56:26.680]  Just finish up with Mark, because we don't have time to go to another caller anyway.
[01:56:26.680 --> 01:56:29.680]  Okay, this is real important.
[01:56:29.680 --> 01:56:31.680]  Is respondeet superior?
[01:56:31.680 --> 01:56:37.680]  We as sovereigns must keep that in mind and not allow ourselves to get engaged
[01:56:37.680 --> 01:56:44.680]  in minor skirmishes with unimportant, low-level public officials.
[01:56:44.680 --> 01:56:53.680]  You and I, and each and all of us, individual citizens, we are the sovereigns.
[01:56:53.680 --> 01:56:59.680]  We don't waste our time with low-level officials.
[01:56:59.680 --> 01:57:03.680]  I used to regularly call the director of the Department of Public Safety.
[01:57:03.680 --> 01:57:11.680]  Any time a DPS officer gave me a problem, I assumed that the director himself
[01:57:11.680 --> 01:57:18.680]  sent that person to do that to me personally, because it was the director
[01:57:18.680 --> 01:57:23.680]  who I put in office through my public officials, through my elected officials.
[01:57:23.680 --> 01:57:25.680]  He hired all these other people.
[01:57:25.680 --> 01:57:33.680]  So in the case of a municipality, it is the mayor who is responsible for all the officials.
[01:57:33.680 --> 01:57:45.680]  He put them in their place, directed them, trained them. They're working under his direction and guidance.
[01:57:45.680 --> 01:57:51.680]  He is responsible. Let's keep our focus.
[01:57:51.680 --> 01:57:56.680]  Let's not get distracted by arguing with the chief of police.
[01:57:56.680 --> 01:58:00.680]  I know most people think the chief of police is important. He is not.
[01:58:00.680 --> 01:58:02.680]  He's not accountable to us. He's not an elected official.
[01:58:02.680 --> 01:58:07.680]  If you have a problem with the police, I've always had a problem with
[01:58:07.680 --> 01:58:11.680]  boycotting the police and throwing protests in front of a police station.
[01:58:11.680 --> 01:58:15.680]  It's not going to do any good. The police are not accountable to us.
[01:58:15.680 --> 01:58:19.680]  If you have a problem with the police, you need to protest city council.
[01:58:19.680 --> 01:58:25.680]  You need to protest city hall. The city council is the one that hired the police.
[01:58:25.680 --> 01:58:28.680]  Exactly. We need to keep our perspective.
[01:58:28.680 --> 01:58:32.680]  Okay, folks. We're running out of time here. Thanks for calling in, Mark.
[01:58:32.680 --> 01:58:33.680]  Thanks a lot.
[01:58:33.680 --> 01:58:36.680]  And other callers waiting. Sorry, we ran out of time.
[01:58:36.680 --> 01:58:39.680]  You can call in tomorrow night. This is the rule of law.
[01:58:39.680 --> 01:58:42.680]  Randy Kelton, Eddie Craig, and Deborah Stevens.
[01:58:42.680 --> 01:58:46.680]  We've got K-Beach Axiom for Liberty tomorrow night at 6 p.m. Central Time.
[01:58:46.680 --> 01:58:49.680]  Folks, please listen to the other shows on this network.
[01:58:49.680 --> 01:58:54.680]  We've got a stellar set of hosts here that have excellent shows.
[01:58:54.680 --> 01:58:58.680]  So everyone that's listening to us tonight needs to be listening to all the other shows, too.
[01:58:58.680 --> 01:58:59.680]  We'll be back.
[01:58:59.680 --> 01:59:28.680]  I'm like a stepping phrase, I don't want my size, I'm dangerous, dangerous.
[01:59:28.680 --> 01:59:36.680]  I'm like a stepping phrase, I don't want my size, I'm dangerous, dangerous.
[01:59:36.680 --> 01:59:43.680]  I'm like a stepping phrase, I don't want my size, I'm dangerous, dangerous.
[01:59:43.680 --> 01:59:59.680]  I'm like a stepping phrase, I'm dangerous, dangerous.