[00:00.000 --> 00:04.000] This news brief brought to you by the International News Net. [00:04.000 --> 00:10.000] Forty-four million, or one in seven people in the US, lived in poverty in 2009, [00:10.000 --> 00:13.000] an increase of four million from the year before. [00:13.000 --> 00:18.000] The poverty rate climbed to fourteen point three percent, the highest since 1994. [00:18.000 --> 00:22.000] The rise was steepest for children, with one in five residents under eighteen [00:22.000 --> 00:26.000] living below the poverty line. [00:26.000 --> 00:32.000] Pennsylvania's Homeland Security Office has awarded a $125,000 contract [00:32.000 --> 00:36.000] to the Institute of Terrorism Research and Response, [00:36.000 --> 00:39.000] a company with extensive links to the Israeli government, [00:39.000 --> 00:44.000] to spy on anti-drilling activists. [00:44.000 --> 00:50.000] The Israeli government officially approved plans Thursday to buy 20 F-35 stealth fighter jets [00:50.000 --> 00:55.000] from defense giant Lockheed Martin for $2.75 billion. [00:55.000 --> 01:02.000] The planes are capable of reaching Iran undetected by radar. [01:02.000 --> 01:07.000] The Nation magazine says companies linked to the private security firm Blackwater, [01:07.000 --> 01:13.000] now called Zee Services, have provided intelligence, training and security services [01:13.000 --> 01:19.000] for Monsanto, Chevron, the Walt Disney Company, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines, [01:19.000 --> 01:23.000] and banking giants Deutsche Bank and Barclays. [01:23.000 --> 01:29.000] Blackwater's work for corporations was contracted using companies owned by Blackwater's owner [01:29.000 --> 01:35.000] and founder Eric Prince, Total Intelligence Solutions, and the Terrorism Research Center. [01:35.000 --> 01:42.000] Disney hired the companies to do a threat assessment for potential film locations in Morocco. [01:42.000 --> 01:46.000] Deutsche Bank hired them to assess Chinese intelligence and Barclays [01:46.000 --> 01:50.000] to perform background checks on Saudi businessmen. [01:50.000 --> 01:54.000] Total Intelligence sought to become an intel arm of Monsanto, [01:54.000 --> 01:58.000] offering to provide operatives to infiltrate activist groups [01:58.000 --> 02:04.000] organizing against the agribusiness giant in 2008 and 2009. [02:04.000 --> 02:07.000] The International Monetary Fund has warned the U.S. and Europe [02:07.000 --> 02:14.000] face the worst jobs crisis since the 1930s and risked an explosion of social unrest. [02:14.000 --> 02:17.000] IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn said, [02:17.000 --> 02:21.000] the great recession has left behind a wasteland of unemployment, [02:21.000 --> 02:28.000] adding high and long-lasting unemployment represents a risk to the stability of existing democracies. [02:28.000 --> 02:34.000] An IMF International Labor Federation report found 30 million jobs have been lost since the crisis, [02:34.000 --> 02:38.000] three-quarters of which were in the richer economies. [02:38.000 --> 02:42.000] Global unemployment has reached 210 million. [02:42.000 --> 02:50.000] The IMF said there may be a link between rising inequality within Western economies and deflating demand. [03:12.000 --> 03:29.000] Well, bad boy, what you want, what you want, what you gonna do [03:29.000 --> 03:43.000] When everything's unbroken for you, tell me what you gonna do, what you gonna do [03:43.000 --> 03:54.000] Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when they come for you [03:54.000 --> 03:59.000] When you were eight and you had bad dreams, you go to school and learn the golden rule [03:59.000 --> 04:05.000] So why are you acting like a bloody fool, if you get hot then you must get cool [04:05.000 --> 04:16.000] Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do, what you gonna do when they come for you [04:16.000 --> 04:20.000] You took it on that one, you took it on this one, you took it on that one [04:20.000 --> 04:27.000] This is The Rule of Law, tonight is Thursday, September 16th, it's 8 p.m. Central Time. [04:27.000 --> 04:33.000] I'm Deborah Stevens, here with Randy Kelton and Eddie Craig. [04:33.000 --> 04:40.000] And tonight I want to introduce our newest sponsor, Stephen Rogers from Shintrition. [04:40.000 --> 04:43.000] Stephen, thank you so much for joining us tonight. [04:43.000 --> 04:45.000] Well, thanks for having me on, to all of you. [04:45.000 --> 04:50.000] And thank you very much, Deborah, for introducing Shintrition to Austin [04:50.000 --> 04:52.000] or being one of the hosts that do that. [04:52.000 --> 04:55.000] Catherine Albrecht also, as you know, is a big fan of Shintrition [04:55.000 --> 04:58.000] and she really put it around Austin. [04:58.000 --> 05:04.000] Yes, and you did send me some product and I did get it earlier this week [05:04.000 --> 05:07.000] and I've been taking it and I really love it a lot. [05:07.000 --> 05:12.000] I can tell you, one of the primary ingredients is spirulina powder. [05:12.000 --> 05:13.000] There's also hemp seed powder. [05:13.000 --> 05:15.000] I'm going to let you talk about some of the other ingredients, [05:15.000 --> 05:20.000] but I've been taking spirulina for about 20 years, so I'm well accustomed to that. [05:20.000 --> 05:23.000] And I tell you, I'm going to need more than one scoop a day of this stuff. [05:23.000 --> 05:27.000] I really, really like it. [05:27.000 --> 05:33.000] You want to be careful because it's the highest milligram dosage of adaptogenic herbs found anywhere. [05:33.000 --> 05:35.000] My background is classical Chinese medicine. [05:35.000 --> 05:39.000] I've also been trained in chiropractic and nutrition. [05:39.000 --> 05:47.000] And this product went through about 12 years of trial and improvement [05:47.000 --> 05:54.000] with about 2,000 patients in private practice, the product that you're taking right now. [05:54.000 --> 05:56.000] And there's 40 ingredients in that product. [05:56.000 --> 06:01.000] And it took a long time to get them just right so they're synergistically balanced [06:01.000 --> 06:05.000] and you get the effects that you obviously felt from the first time you'd taken it. [06:05.000 --> 06:10.000] The biggest thing that this combination, you talked about spirulina and hemp seed, [06:10.000 --> 06:11.000] I use those as a delivery system. [06:11.000 --> 06:15.000] The real impact of this product are the adaptogenic herbs. [06:15.000 --> 06:20.000] And a lot of people don't know what those are, but the key word in here is adapt. [06:20.000 --> 06:25.000] What we don't realize every day is that we're under all kinds of stressors, [06:25.000 --> 06:28.000] mental, emotional, physical, environmental, spiritual stressors. [06:28.000 --> 06:31.000] I mean, we are just bombarded with stressors. [06:31.000 --> 06:37.000] And the key to optimum health is how do we metabolize those stressors? [06:37.000 --> 06:40.000] Now, a lot of people, when they think of stress, they just think about psychological stress, [06:40.000 --> 06:42.000] the emotional stress or mental stress. [06:42.000 --> 06:45.000] But everything in one way or another causes stress. [06:45.000 --> 06:46.000] We can't get away from it. [06:46.000 --> 06:50.000] But again, the key to optimum health is how do we metabolize it? [06:50.000 --> 06:53.000] Now, when we're young, our adrenals are strong, our endocrine system is strong. [06:53.000 --> 06:57.000] So our body mobilizes when stressors attack us, [06:57.000 --> 07:01.000] whether they're microbes or environmental toxins or emotional stress. [07:01.000 --> 07:09.000] And we respond and we metabolize all the stress as eustress, that's E-U-S-T-R-E-S-S. [07:09.000 --> 07:11.000] And that's anabolic, meaning it builds us up. [07:11.000 --> 07:12.000] We grow from it. [07:12.000 --> 07:14.000] We get healthier from it. [07:14.000 --> 07:16.000] Older and our adrenals decline. [07:16.000 --> 07:21.000] Everything becomes catabolic or distressful, which begins to break us down, [07:21.000 --> 07:24.000] and it becomes disease in the body. [07:24.000 --> 07:27.000] So that's what this combination really does, [07:27.000 --> 07:34.000] is it helps to restore those adrenals and the life force in the body so we adapt better. [07:34.000 --> 07:35.000] Absolutely. [07:35.000 --> 07:42.000] And this is a pretty impressive list of proprietary adaptogenic and tonic herbal blend that you have here, [07:42.000 --> 07:43.000] a very impressive list of herbs. [07:43.000 --> 07:47.000] You've got holey basil leaf powder, lyceum fruit powder, [07:47.000 --> 07:57.000] faux tea, American ginseng root, astragalus root, and just a whole list more. [07:57.000 --> 07:58.000] There's licorice. [07:58.000 --> 08:01.000] There's rhodiola. [08:01.000 --> 08:03.000] I mean, it just goes on and on. [08:03.000 --> 08:05.000] And definitely you can feel the results. [08:05.000 --> 08:08.000] And welcome to have you on board here. [08:08.000 --> 08:11.000] And folks, if you'd like to get some of this centrition, again, [08:11.000 --> 08:18.000] there's the superfoods blend with hemp seed and spirulina and acai or acai, [08:18.000 --> 08:20.000] as some people pronounce it, berry fruit powder. [08:20.000 --> 08:22.000] I mean, it just goes on and on. [08:22.000 --> 08:26.000] You can purchase that at ruleoflawradio.com. [08:26.000 --> 08:31.000] And if you scroll down right underneath where all the photos are of all the hosts on the network, [08:31.000 --> 08:38.000] you'll see the banner right there for centrition. [08:38.000 --> 08:44.000] So please go there, and your purchases absolutely do support this network. [08:44.000 --> 08:48.000] So we encourage everyone to please support the sponsors of this network. [08:48.000 --> 08:51.000] You can click on the banner, feel more energy and less stress. [08:51.000 --> 08:57.000] And it really is a healthy, a very healthy product to take, and we appreciate that. [08:57.000 --> 09:04.000] So why don't you tell us a little more about this herbal blend and your background? [09:04.000 --> 09:08.000] You have a master's degree in oriental medicine. [09:08.000 --> 09:15.000] You're obviously very schooled and very researched in these types of herbal blends. [09:15.000 --> 09:19.000] Well, back in 1993, I got myself in a real jam. [09:19.000 --> 09:24.000] I was suffering from alcohol and cocaine addiction. [09:24.000 --> 09:28.000] And as you probably are aware of, many of your listeners, [09:28.000 --> 09:31.000] that kind of lifestyle will deplete the adrenals and the endocrine system [09:31.000 --> 09:36.000] and just leave person pretty much in a state of chronic illness. [09:36.000 --> 09:40.000] Well, lucky enough, the Creator was looking out for me, [09:40.000 --> 09:44.000] and I got locked up for 18 months for a possession charge. [09:44.000 --> 09:49.000] And while I was going through my recovery, if you would, in prison, [09:49.000 --> 09:52.000] I began to study while I was in there. [09:52.000 --> 09:57.000] And it motivated me when I got out to not only begin to heal my life, [09:57.000 --> 10:01.000] but to learn more so that I could help others that were going through [10:01.000 --> 10:03.000] the same thing that I was going through, [10:03.000 --> 10:07.000] whether it was addiction or just chronic illness and disease. [10:07.000 --> 10:12.000] And I found that there's a certain class of herbs that we call adaptogens, [10:12.000 --> 10:14.000] the West and the East, they call them tonic herbs, [10:14.000 --> 10:20.000] and they grow in very extreme environments, 14,000 feet, sometimes 40 below, [10:20.000 --> 10:22.000] a year-long harsh environment. [10:22.000 --> 10:25.000] And what they learn to do is to survive and thrive, [10:25.000 --> 10:27.000] and that's the key word, thrive in these environments. [10:27.000 --> 10:31.000] And they develop certain phytochemicals that allow them to do that. [10:31.000 --> 10:34.000] So when we ingest those phytochemicals, guess what? [10:34.000 --> 10:39.000] We not only learn how to survive better, but to thrive better. [10:39.000 --> 10:43.000] Now, they were given the name adaptogens by some famous Russian scientists [10:43.000 --> 10:49.000] who utilized them for their famous Olympic athletes [10:49.000 --> 10:53.000] who were infamous for overtraining and using steroids. [10:53.000 --> 10:56.000] So they used these to help them in the recovery process [10:56.000 --> 11:00.000] and to adapt to the psychological and physical stress that they were going through, [11:00.000 --> 11:03.000] and they worked wonders, hence the name adaptogens. [11:03.000 --> 11:07.000] Like I said before, they were called tonic herbs in the East. [11:07.000 --> 11:13.000] Now, what makes them really unique more than any other plant or botanical on the planet [11:13.000 --> 11:19.000] is that if you have a deficient condition in your body or an excessive condition in your body, [11:19.000 --> 11:21.000] an adaptogen will bring you back to homeostasis. [11:21.000 --> 11:22.000] That's all it's ever doing. [11:22.000 --> 11:24.000] It will never take you out of balance. [11:24.000 --> 11:30.000] Now, the key to oxygen and health is how well we adapt or how well we stay in balance. [11:30.000 --> 11:31.000] That's the key. [11:31.000 --> 11:35.000] Most people are out of balance all the time. [11:35.000 --> 11:39.000] Now, they're not out of balance much, because if you were out of balance much, you'd be dead. [11:39.000 --> 11:42.000] Your body's fighting all day long to maintain homeostasis. [11:42.000 --> 11:47.000] Now, people who have oxygen and health, they use very little life force to maintain homeostasis. [11:47.000 --> 11:51.000] People who are usually chronically ill and sick, they're still somewhat in balance, [11:51.000 --> 11:56.000] but they're using all their life force and their reserve to maintain that balance. [11:56.000 --> 12:06.000] What adaptogens do is they lessen the load that your body has to perform to maintain homeostasis or balance. [12:06.000 --> 12:09.000] So we have the widest array of adaptogens here. [12:09.000 --> 12:12.000] We also have the highest milligram dose of adaptogens. [12:12.000 --> 12:15.000] Also, we use superfoods and hemp protein. [12:15.000 --> 12:17.000] The reason why I use hemp protein, hemp seed protein, [12:17.000 --> 12:21.000] is because it's one of the most bioavailable food sources on the planet, [12:21.000 --> 12:23.000] and it acts as a great delivery system. [12:23.000 --> 12:27.000] If we're taking just herbs, the body's not conditioned to taking them all the time. [12:27.000 --> 12:32.000] So we lose a lot of the bioavailability, meaning the body doesn't assimilate all of them. [12:32.000 --> 12:36.000] So if you put a very bioavailable food source in there with it, [12:36.000 --> 12:40.000] it acts as a great carrier, and the body will begin to absorb more of these herbs. [12:40.000 --> 12:42.000] So that's why you feel it instantly. [12:42.000 --> 12:47.000] In fact, if you go on my Web site, I give a 110 percent guarantee. [12:47.000 --> 12:51.000] That means if you don't like this product, if it doesn't do what I say it does, [12:51.000 --> 12:54.000] you mail it back, I give you all of your money, and 10 percent I'll give you. [12:54.000 --> 13:00.000] No one's ever taken me up on that offer because it does what I say it's going to do. [13:00.000 --> 13:01.000] That's fantastic. [13:01.000 --> 13:04.000] I've never heard of a 110 percent guarantee, [13:04.000 --> 13:10.000] and plus on top of it no one's ever taken you up on it, and I certainly can see why. [13:10.000 --> 13:13.000] Well, you know, and also I'm offering tonight, if they go in, [13:13.000 --> 13:19.000] when they click on your banner ad on your site, or if they go through to my cart, [13:19.000 --> 13:25.000] getchen.com, G-E-T-S-H-E-N dot com, they will see a coupon code there. [13:25.000 --> 13:28.000] And if they put in rule of law, they will get 10 percent off. [13:28.000 --> 13:34.000] Also, if they go to the Barton Springs Daily Juice, they carry our product. [13:34.000 --> 13:37.000] They can also go in there and get 20 percent off and just try it. [13:37.000 --> 13:41.000] They will actually take a scoop, and they will put in one of their famous smoothies [13:41.000 --> 13:43.000] and mix it up for you, and you can try it, [13:43.000 --> 13:47.000] so if you're just a little leery about buying something over the web for the first time, [13:47.000 --> 13:49.000] and it will give you 20 percent off in your drink. [13:49.000 --> 13:52.000] Okay, my personal favorite drink to mix it in there is Curious George. [13:52.000 --> 13:56.000] It's banana and hemp milk, or not hemp milk, but rice milk. [13:56.000 --> 13:59.000] My wife, she actually likes the banana nut. [13:59.000 --> 14:02.000] It's banana, apple, and peanut butter, and they put a scoop of centrician in it. [14:02.000 --> 14:07.000] But it's only in the Barton Springs Daily Juice. [14:07.000 --> 14:09.000] Well, that's fantastic. [14:09.000 --> 14:14.000] Yeah, and it is carried by certain other stores in Austin. [14:14.000 --> 14:16.000] You were mentioning People's Pharmacy also carries it. [14:16.000 --> 14:20.000] But folks, we want you to buy it from rule of law radio, okay, [14:20.000 --> 14:25.000] so that you can support the network and support this radio show, of course. [14:25.000 --> 14:26.000] Sorry about that. [14:26.000 --> 14:28.000] No, no, no, absolutely. [14:28.000 --> 14:33.000] People should stop by the Barton Springs place and get a smoothie just to try it out. [14:33.000 --> 14:37.000] But guaranteed, you're going to love it. [14:37.000 --> 14:41.000] And I haven't seen a product that has this many herbs and this kind of blend. [14:41.000 --> 14:44.000] I mean, like I said, I've been taking spirulina for years, [14:44.000 --> 14:49.000] and some of these other herbs as well, but never all put together in one product like this. [14:49.000 --> 14:50.000] So I'm pretty impressed. [14:50.000 --> 14:56.000] You know, it took a lot of years, and I was in really, really bad shape when I first started, [14:56.000 --> 15:00.000] when I got out of prison and I first started messing around with these herbs. [15:00.000 --> 15:04.000] I was boiling them in a pot, on the stove in a pot. [15:04.000 --> 15:07.000] And I started out with four of them and just playing with them. [15:07.000 --> 15:13.000] And then I just dove into it in college and figured out there was a whole array of these [15:13.000 --> 15:17.000] atonic herbs that really were not being utilized that much in nutrition. [15:17.000 --> 15:22.000] You know, we're so treatment-based, even in natural medicine, we're treatment-based. [15:22.000 --> 15:25.000] People come in through the door and they want the chief complaint fixed. [15:25.000 --> 15:30.000] So rather than thinking about wellness and using an herb that you can use in all cases, [15:30.000 --> 15:35.000] like adaptogen, we would use specific types of herbs and food stuff [15:35.000 --> 15:38.000] to treat that particular patient for whatever their illness is. [15:38.000 --> 15:42.000] So even though we think we're practicing wellness or holistic medicine, [15:42.000 --> 15:47.000] we're really practicing chief complaint medicine, even in natural medicine. [15:47.000 --> 15:51.000] So I tried to get away from that and build the body's reserves up, and that's what I did first. [15:51.000 --> 15:56.000] You can't really heal somebody if their body's completely depleted of chi or life force. [15:56.000 --> 15:58.000] You need to get that strong first. [15:58.000 --> 16:04.000] So that's where this product was really developed on from that premise. [16:04.000 --> 16:07.000] That's fantastic. [16:07.000 --> 16:10.000] Now one of the things we want to talk about tonight, Stephen, [16:10.000 --> 16:16.000] is the legal situation regarding herbs these days. [16:16.000 --> 16:22.000] And you were mentioning that Codex Alimentarius was snuck through a few months ago. [16:22.000 --> 16:27.000] We're about to go to break here, but when we get back, I would like to get into this [16:27.000 --> 16:33.000] and just what is Codex Alimentarius and how is that affecting your business now [16:33.000 --> 16:36.000] and what can we do about it? [16:36.000 --> 16:37.000] All right. [16:37.000 --> 16:38.000] We're going to break right now. [16:38.000 --> 16:41.000] We'll be right back with Stephen Rogers from Schentrition. [16:41.000 --> 16:46.000] You can find out more about it by clicking the banner on ruleoflawradio.com, [16:46.000 --> 16:50.000] the big green banner that says feel more energy and less stress [16:50.000 --> 16:55.000] right underneath the schedule and the photos of the other hosts on this network. [16:55.000 --> 17:12.000] We will be right back, folks. [17:25.000 --> 17:52.000] We'll be right back. [17:55.000 --> 18:14.000] After you use Schentrition, you'll believe in supplements again. [18:14.000 --> 18:29.000] Thank you. [18:29.000 --> 18:44.000] Thank you. [18:44.000 --> 18:59.000] Thank you. [18:59.000 --> 19:14.000] Thank you. [19:14.000 --> 19:29.000] Thank you. [19:29.000 --> 19:44.000] Thank you. [19:44.000 --> 19:59.000] Thank you. [19:59.000 --> 20:00.000] Okay, folks. [20:00.000 --> 20:05.000] We are back with our very special guest and newest sponsor, Stephen Rogers of Schentrition. [20:05.000 --> 20:11.000] Now, we want to discuss this Codex Alimentarius bill, which has been recently quietly passed [20:11.000 --> 20:15.000] into law by Congress by being piggybacked on another bill. [20:15.000 --> 20:19.000] Now, Stephen, I haven't studied the final version that was recently passed, [20:19.000 --> 20:22.000] but I have been following this for quite a number of years now, [20:22.000 --> 20:28.000] and some of the earlier versions of the bill were quite disturbing, to say the least. [20:28.000 --> 20:33.000] It would require people to get a doctor's prescription in order to have access to health supplements [20:33.000 --> 20:37.000] such as echinacea, colloidal silver, and even vitamin C. [20:37.000 --> 20:42.000] And from what I understand, from what I've read, you couldn't purchase any vitamins or herbs at all [20:42.000 --> 20:45.000] without a Western doctor's prescription anymore. [20:45.000 --> 20:51.000] Now, the holistic health community has been screaming bloody murder about this bill for quite some time now, [20:51.000 --> 20:54.000] and yet still it's been passed. [20:54.000 --> 20:58.000] So what are the terms of this bill that were actually passed into law, [20:58.000 --> 21:02.000] and what does it mean for folks like you and me? [21:02.000 --> 21:09.000] Well, what you were speaking of is what everyone's afraid that this bill will turn into. [21:09.000 --> 21:13.000] What actually got passed through I've read many times, and I did a show yesterday on it [21:13.000 --> 21:19.000] and read the actual bill or part of it that I was concerned about on the show, and it's very ambiguous. [21:19.000 --> 21:21.000] It doesn't actually say everything you said. [21:21.000 --> 21:26.000] Prior bills that were tried to pass, from my understanding, [21:26.000 --> 21:31.000] modeled what is going on in Norway and Germany right now, [21:31.000 --> 21:33.000] and that's exactly what you were talking about. [21:33.000 --> 21:34.000] Let me give you an example. [21:34.000 --> 21:38.000] If you go into, say, a fell food store in Norway, [21:38.000 --> 21:41.000] most of all of the products in there have very low milligram dosages, [21:41.000 --> 21:44.000] meaning they have no therapeutic or medicinal value. [21:44.000 --> 21:47.000] And if you took it for three or four months, you might get some value out of it, [21:47.000 --> 21:53.000] or you might just get some, I mean, it has, I guess, fibrin or something like that. [21:53.000 --> 21:57.000] But if you wanted to get any kind of herb or like my product or a nutritional product [21:57.000 --> 22:01.000] that has a high milligram dosage, meaning it's medicinal quality, [22:01.000 --> 22:06.000] you would have to go to a physician that's qualified to give you a prescription for it. [22:06.000 --> 22:12.000] So then guess who's controlling the whole process, the pharmaceutical company? [22:12.000 --> 22:15.000] Now, what we have been trying, well, I don't want to say we, [22:15.000 --> 22:20.000] but certain people in this country have been trying to do is to harmonize our laws [22:20.000 --> 22:24.000] with the laws of CODEX or the regulations of CODEX, [22:24.000 --> 22:28.000] which are set by the UN, the United Nations. [22:28.000 --> 22:32.000] Now, what I read did not say all of that. [22:32.000 --> 22:35.000] However, it did leave, and people can go read it. [22:35.000 --> 22:40.000] It's up on the, well, you know what, I will send that to you. [22:40.000 --> 22:42.000] You can put it up on your website where they can go read it. [22:42.000 --> 22:49.000] But in G, if they go down to G and read G, they will see there that it's very ambiguous. [22:49.000 --> 22:54.000] Basically, what it's saying is that an appointed official or a group of appointed officials [22:54.000 --> 23:06.000] by the president can determine what therapeutic levels of nutritional products [23:06.000 --> 23:14.000] and herbs are toxic or nontoxic, which ones are deemed valid or invalid. [23:14.000 --> 23:18.000] It doesn't really outline anything, which really scares me. [23:18.000 --> 23:22.000] I would rather it just be completely outlined so we know what we're up against. [23:22.000 --> 23:27.000] They have really left this thing wide open to be able to do just about anything they want to do. [23:27.000 --> 23:29.000] Now, will they do that? [23:29.000 --> 23:30.000] I don't know. [23:30.000 --> 23:31.000] I hope not. [23:31.000 --> 23:33.000] You know, I'm a little more optimistic. [23:33.000 --> 23:35.000] But here's the smoking gun. [23:35.000 --> 23:38.000] Here's the problem I have with all of this. [23:38.000 --> 23:43.000] If it really was benevolent and was for the consumer and to protect the consumer, [23:43.000 --> 23:49.000] then why in the world are they still using things like thimerosal, you know, mercury in vaccines? [23:49.000 --> 23:51.000] I mean, we know what mercury does. [23:51.000 --> 23:54.000] Why don't they already go ahead and regulate that and get that out of there? [23:54.000 --> 24:00.000] Why is it that we go, if they want to regulate all food stuff and they want to protect the consumer, [24:00.000 --> 24:06.000] why is it that we still eat things that are loaded with GMO or that are genetically modified? [24:06.000 --> 24:09.000] Why do we still eat things that are loaded with hydrogenated fats? [24:09.000 --> 24:10.000] We know what those do. [24:10.000 --> 24:11.000] And what about aspartame? [24:11.000 --> 24:12.000] Why is that approved? [24:12.000 --> 24:13.000] Why is it? [24:13.000 --> 24:14.000] Exactly. [24:14.000 --> 24:18.000] So that's the smoking gun to me that makes me say, OK, this is not benevolent. [24:18.000 --> 24:22.000] Because sometimes I do, I like to put my head in the sand and pretend that, you know, [24:22.000 --> 24:25.000] there's not people out there that really want to control everything like this. [24:25.000 --> 24:28.000] But I mean, it's just, it's a little too obvious. [24:28.000 --> 24:33.000] So I think what people really need to start doing is writing their congressmen and their senator, [24:33.000 --> 24:38.000] because every time that we've done that or called, we've been able to stop this thing in its tracks. [24:38.000 --> 24:45.000] And I really don't believe that it's going to end up like in Norway or in Germany, [24:45.000 --> 24:49.000] because there's shows like yours, the shows on yesterday and a hundred other shows out there [24:49.000 --> 24:51.000] that are talking about this right now. [24:51.000 --> 24:55.000] The reason why I'm optimistic is because Canada, and they go to the Canadians, [24:55.000 --> 24:58.000] the population up there, they stopped it dead in its tracks. [24:58.000 --> 25:03.000] And they're a lot more farther down the line to harmonizing all of their rules [25:03.000 --> 25:06.000] and regulations to the UN than we are. [25:06.000 --> 25:09.000] Well, Stephen, you touched on an important point here concerning the UN. [25:09.000 --> 25:17.000] This Codex Alimentarius Bill is all part of the evil UN Agenda 21 plan for population control [25:17.000 --> 25:22.000] and the abolishment of the individual's right to own private property, including our own bodies, [25:22.000 --> 25:26.000] and to control what we do and what we don't put into our own bodies. [25:26.000 --> 25:31.000] But as a sovereign nation, we have no duty to comply with a UN policy. [25:31.000 --> 25:37.000] We have to start looking at the big picture here and rejecting anything that is part of Agenda 21. [25:37.000 --> 25:40.000] Now, back to the Codex Alimentarius Bill, just what exactly are the terms? [25:40.000 --> 25:45.000] What are they planning to regulate and how, and how will this all be implemented? [25:45.000 --> 25:50.000] Well, we don't really know what is passed if you read it. [25:50.000 --> 25:51.000] It's very ambiguous. [25:51.000 --> 25:55.000] It doesn't say and list there that we're going to control vitamin C. [25:55.000 --> 25:57.000] We're going to make all these things hard to get. [25:57.000 --> 26:01.000] It really leaves a lot, like I said, it's very ambiguous. [26:01.000 --> 26:02.000] Go read it. [26:02.000 --> 26:03.000] They pretty much can do anything. [26:03.000 --> 26:05.000] It doesn't mean they will do anything. [26:05.000 --> 26:09.000] So would the FDA be setting up additional regulations to implement this, [26:09.000 --> 26:11.000] and would there be other agencies involved as well? [26:11.000 --> 26:18.000] There would be a group, but I'm sure the FDA would be involved with the WTC, the FAO, [26:18.000 --> 26:26.000] the federal agricultural, or not federal, but the agricultural organization, and one other body. [26:26.000 --> 26:30.000] Well, Codex itself, Codex, there's like four different ones involved in it. [26:30.000 --> 26:35.000] And, of course, there would be officials that would be appointed by Obama [26:35.000 --> 26:39.000] or whatever president, whoever is in the office at that time. [26:39.000 --> 26:41.000] There's another thing that bothers me too. [26:41.000 --> 26:46.000] If you go back and you look at Codex and you look at the doctor that actually said, [26:46.000 --> 26:53.000] he made the statement that these herbs and nutritional products can be toxins. [26:53.000 --> 26:56.000] Well, yes, they can. They can be full of toxins. [26:56.000 --> 27:00.000] But he basically just took a brush and said they're all toxins, you know, [27:00.000 --> 27:02.000] and they're not good for us. [27:02.000 --> 27:04.000] The language is all over the Internet. [27:04.000 --> 27:05.000] You can find it. [27:05.000 --> 27:08.000] But here's where I have a problem, that this individual, [27:08.000 --> 27:14.000] the company that did the testing and came up with this statement, [27:14.000 --> 27:18.000] he was actually the executive, one of the executives of the company. [27:18.000 --> 27:23.000] In this country, that would be a conflict of interest, as far as I know. [27:23.000 --> 27:25.000] And yet, in Europe, they can get away with doing that. [27:25.000 --> 27:30.000] And this body being an international body, certainly, you know, [27:30.000 --> 27:34.000] we have no way of fighting that at all. [27:34.000 --> 27:36.000] So that's where I have another problem too, [27:36.000 --> 27:39.000] is that you have an individual that actually has a conflict of interest [27:39.000 --> 27:42.000] and is part owner of the company that called them toxins. [27:42.000 --> 27:44.000] So these are the things that need to be pointed out, [27:44.000 --> 27:47.000] and they need to be brought out more and more to the general public, [27:47.000 --> 27:50.000] and there's a whole heck of a lot of people out there buying products right now [27:50.000 --> 27:53.000] that aren't thinking like me that their primary source of income [27:53.000 --> 27:55.000] comes from a nutritional product. [27:55.000 --> 27:58.000] They're just thinking about, okay, each month I buy a $47 product. [27:58.000 --> 28:01.000] But it's the people that stand up and complain [28:01.000 --> 28:03.000] that we're really going to get this stuff done. [28:03.000 --> 28:06.000] It's not me. [28:06.000 --> 28:12.000] So, Stephen, do you think that is Congress gearing up to pass any other laws [28:12.000 --> 28:16.000] to clarify this, or are they just planning on turning this whole thing over [28:16.000 --> 28:20.000] to the FDA to just pass, you know, for the FDA to just enact whatever rules [28:20.000 --> 28:25.000] and regulations they want to deal with this law? [28:25.000 --> 28:27.000] Well, I have no idea. [28:27.000 --> 28:29.000] I don't think anyone really does right now. [28:29.000 --> 28:32.000] We're just kind of in the waiting and seeing mode. [28:32.000 --> 28:33.000] I mean, it's there. [28:33.000 --> 28:34.000] It's been signed. [28:34.000 --> 28:35.000] The ink is on it. [28:35.000 --> 28:38.000] It went across the President's desk. [28:38.000 --> 28:40.000] So we'll just have to wait and see what they're going to do with it. [28:40.000 --> 28:44.000] I don't know what any other regulations are going to come more than anybody else. [28:44.000 --> 28:46.000] I don't want them to. [28:46.000 --> 28:48.000] Like I said before, I'm not optimistic. [28:48.000 --> 28:50.000] I just don't think people in this country will stand for it. [28:50.000 --> 28:53.000] If it does, if they start to implement it on a mass level, [28:53.000 --> 28:55.000] I just can't see it happening. [28:55.000 --> 28:58.000] Like I said, if they stopped it in Canada dead in its tracks, [28:58.000 --> 29:02.000] they would stop it here. [29:02.000 --> 29:03.000] Exactly. [29:03.000 --> 29:08.000] So apparently they have not implemented any rules and regulations yet. [29:08.000 --> 29:12.000] They're sort of in a waiting stage right now. [29:12.000 --> 29:16.000] Right, we just went through three years of a graduated plan on GMP standards. [29:16.000 --> 29:20.000] Now GMP standards means good manufacturing practices. [29:20.000 --> 29:24.000] And all of the manufacturers now need to be GMP compliant. [29:24.000 --> 29:25.000] And it put a lot of people out of business. [29:25.000 --> 29:28.000] And there's a lot of people out there still operating that aren't GMP compliant [29:28.000 --> 29:31.000] because they didn't have the tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of dollars [29:31.000 --> 29:35.000] to become GMP compliant. [29:35.000 --> 29:36.000] Absolutely. [29:36.000 --> 29:40.000] Now when we get back on the other side, I would like to discuss what exactly that means. [29:40.000 --> 29:41.000] Okay. [29:41.000 --> 29:45.000] Okay, we'll be back in just a moment on the other side of this break [29:45.000 --> 29:48.000] with Stephen Rogers from Schentrition. [29:48.000 --> 29:55.000] You can find out more information by clicking on the banner on ruleoflawradio.com. [29:55.000 --> 29:57.000] Feel more energy and less stress. [29:57.000 --> 30:01.000] We'll be right back, folks. [30:01.000 --> 30:05.000] Top 10 reasons to question the official story of the Oklahoma City bombing. [30:05.000 --> 30:07.000] Reason number 10, what is on the surveillance tapes? [30:07.000 --> 30:10.000] There were many video surveillance cameras that recorded the morning of the bombing. [30:10.000 --> 30:13.000] Yet the few of these that have been released do not show what transpired [30:13.000 --> 30:15.000] with the Ryder truck at the Murrah Building. [30:15.000 --> 30:17.000] Most recently, the government has claimed that all of the cameras [30:17.000 --> 30:20.000] that were in different buildings and maintained by different businesses [30:20.000 --> 30:24.000] were all having their tapes changed at the exact same time, 9.02 a.m. [30:24.000 --> 30:27.000] This is insulting to the memory of those who perished in the bombing. [30:27.000 --> 30:28.000] What is being hidden from us? [30:28.000 --> 30:32.000] For more information, please go to okcbombingtruth.com. [30:32.000 --> 30:36.000] The Chicago Blackhawks stunned the hockey world by coming out of nowhere [30:36.000 --> 30:38.000] to win the Western Conference Finals. [30:38.000 --> 30:41.000] Their secret weapon was a readily available health supplement. [30:41.000 --> 30:45.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll be right back to tell you how they did it. [30:45.000 --> 30:47.000] Privacy is under attack. [30:47.000 --> 30:50.000] When you give up data about yourself, you'll never get it back again. [30:50.000 --> 30:55.000] And once your privacy is gone, you'll find your freedoms will start to vanish too. [30:55.000 --> 31:00.000] So protect your rights, say no to surveillance, and keep your information to yourself. [31:00.000 --> 31:03.000] Privacy, it's worth hanging on to. [31:03.000 --> 31:06.000] This public service announcement is brought to you by StartPage.com, [31:06.000 --> 31:10.000] the private search engine alternative to Google, Yahoo, and Bing. [31:10.000 --> 31:13.000] Start over with StartPage. [31:13.000 --> 31:16.000] What shot the Blackhawks to victory? Vitamin D. [31:16.000 --> 31:20.000] When team members took a daily supplement, they caught fewer colds, [31:20.000 --> 31:23.000] recovered faster from injuries, and their game took off. [31:23.000 --> 31:25.000] And it's not just athletes who can benefit. [31:25.000 --> 31:28.000] Your body makes Vitamin D when sunlight hits your skin, [31:28.000 --> 31:32.000] but adults who work indoors and kids who watch a lot of TV probably don't get enough, [31:32.000 --> 31:36.000] putting them at risk for illness, bone problems, and even heart disease. [31:36.000 --> 31:40.000] Be sure you and your kids get 10 to 15 minutes of sun exposure several times a week, [31:40.000 --> 31:44.000] or ask your doctor about a daily natural Vitamin D supplement. [31:44.000 --> 31:48.000] You can learn more about this amazing vitamin at vitamindcouncil.org. [31:48.000 --> 32:11.000] This is Dr. Catherine Albrecht. More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [32:11.000 --> 32:16.000] Okay, folks, we're back with Stephen Rogers from Centrition. [32:16.000 --> 32:22.000] And yes, absolutely, as we were discussing on the previous segment, [32:22.000 --> 32:28.000] this is not something that is meant for the good of the people [32:28.000 --> 32:33.000] because they will not remove things like aspartame from the market. [32:33.000 --> 32:36.000] They will not prohibit the use of fluoride in the water. [32:36.000 --> 32:40.000] In fact, they want to up the fluoride. They want to put lithium in the water. [32:40.000 --> 32:42.000] It just gets worse and worse. [32:42.000 --> 32:48.000] On top of it all, now there is something called this Good Manufacturing Practices [32:48.000 --> 32:50.000] that they are imposing on folks. [32:50.000 --> 32:54.000] So Stephen, tell us a little bit about this GMP. [32:54.000 --> 33:03.000] All right, well, Good Manufacturing Practices started around 2007 to 2010 or 2008 to 2010. [33:03.000 --> 33:05.000] I think it was a three-year graduation process. [33:05.000 --> 33:08.000] I'm not a manufacturer, but I have manufacturers of products. [33:08.000 --> 33:14.000] Basically, the smallest companies were hit at the end and the biggest companies were hit in the beginning. [33:14.000 --> 33:18.000] And you had to go through – you had to be GMP compliant. [33:18.000 --> 33:25.000] Now, I'm going to play the devil's advocate here because I like everything that they wanted them to do. [33:25.000 --> 33:27.000] I just don't like the government regulating it. [33:27.000 --> 33:29.000] I want people to do it on their own. [33:29.000 --> 33:32.000] I want people to have a high level of integrity and say, you know what? [33:32.000 --> 33:36.000] I'm going to do all the testing that they require to protect the consumer. [33:36.000 --> 33:39.000] Now, I have – I got rid of five of my products. [33:39.000 --> 33:45.000] I have just Schentrition now because of the GMP compliancy that came down. [33:45.000 --> 33:48.000] And the reason why is just because of liability. [33:48.000 --> 33:54.000] My manufacturers didn't go out of business, but now they're not compliant of my other products, not Schentrition. [33:54.000 --> 34:02.000] So what happens is the FDA has contracted companies to go out there and they'll go into their facility [34:02.000 --> 34:05.000] and if they're not GMP compliant, they'll just find them [34:05.000 --> 34:08.000] and they'll just keep finding them and finding them until they find them out of business. [34:08.000 --> 34:11.000] Now, most of those people do a really good job. [34:11.000 --> 34:13.000] All of my manufacturers did a really good job. [34:13.000 --> 34:19.000] They just could – they were mom and pops and they could not afford the tens of thousands of dollars to become compliant. [34:19.000 --> 34:22.000] Now, there's a large group of people that think, well, that's – [34:22.000 --> 34:25.000] the pharmaceutical companies realize there's a lot of money in this. [34:25.000 --> 34:29.000] They couldn't discredit nutrition and nutritional products anymore. [34:29.000 --> 34:34.000] So now they'll just buy up all the manufacturing and put out all the other – they'll kill the competition. [34:34.000 --> 34:36.000] And that may be true, right? [34:36.000 --> 34:41.000] I'm not going to say it is or it isn't, but it may be – it sure looks like it anyway because they did it. [34:41.000 --> 34:49.000] But the biggest thing that GMP – that really bothers me about the whole GMP thing, [34:49.000 --> 34:59.000] other than putting people out of business and stuff, is it – is my particular manufacturer – [34:59.000 --> 35:03.000] and if you'll notice and you go in there and you see who owns these companies now, [35:03.000 --> 35:08.000] like one of my companies, I won't say the first name, but they're all ending now with pharmaceutical. [35:08.000 --> 35:17.000] And that bothers me because they don't have our best interests in mind when it comes to nutritional products at all. [35:17.000 --> 35:24.000] I mean, they don't – when they look at nutritional products, for the most part, they really think they have no therapeutic value. [35:24.000 --> 35:32.000] So I really – I have a problem with manufacturers out there that have a conflict of interest that really aren't passionate [35:32.000 --> 35:35.000] and believe in these products. [35:35.000 --> 35:39.000] So it kind of makes me think – if I'm thinking like a conspiracy theorist out there, [35:39.000 --> 35:43.000] it kind of makes me think that this is the calm before the storm. [35:43.000 --> 35:47.000] They buy up all the manufacturers or get control of the whole manufacturing process, [35:47.000 --> 35:50.000] and then the whole cards come down. [35:50.000 --> 35:54.000] Yeah, and then that's when Codex is easy to implement at that point. [35:54.000 --> 35:57.000] I mean, when you get control of the whole manufacturing process. [35:57.000 --> 36:04.000] So a lot of people don't even know this has went on, the whole GMP manufacturing – with the manufacturing side of it. [36:04.000 --> 36:12.000] And again, you want people to not have melamine in the milk coming from – or the dried milk coming from China and stuff like that. [36:12.000 --> 36:15.000] You want people to test, and of course some people don't. [36:15.000 --> 36:16.000] It slips through. [36:16.000 --> 36:19.000] You get a few bad apples, and that's how they implement this regulation. [36:19.000 --> 36:23.000] They take that and they put it all over every front page and all over the news. [36:23.000 --> 36:27.000] Then everybody gets behind it, yes, we've got to have this regulation, we've got to have this regulation. [36:27.000 --> 36:32.000] Instead of just using the free market principles or stop buying the products from those people, put them out of business. [36:32.000 --> 36:36.000] That will teach them a lesson, and we get more draconian laws. [36:36.000 --> 36:43.000] And that's the thing that scares the heck out of me. [36:43.000 --> 36:44.000] Right, absolutely. [36:44.000 --> 36:50.000] And you'll find out that when these kind of regulations come in, they use selective enforcement. [36:50.000 --> 37:01.000] They won't use it to punish the big guys who put melamine in the dried milk, like you're talking about, in all these giant manufacturing production plants. [37:01.000 --> 37:13.000] But if somebody like you or some other herbal blend producer does one little tiny thing wrong, well, then they're going to put you out of business. [37:13.000 --> 37:15.000] Oh, yes, most definitely. [37:15.000 --> 37:22.000] And again, like I said, I want people to play by the rules and to have a high level of integrity with their products. [37:22.000 --> 37:26.000] I mean, if you look at some of the testing they do with GMP, it's really good. [37:26.000 --> 37:33.000] I mean, they do all the heavy metal testing, all the toxins, other toxins and bacteria, and they test all of that. [37:33.000 --> 37:35.000] I mean, it's really, really stringent. [37:35.000 --> 37:41.000] But it put a lot of people out of business because to go through and do all those things and the upgrades that they had to do, [37:41.000 --> 37:46.000] most of the mom and pops out there just can't do it, and they're operating outside GMP compliance right now. [37:46.000 --> 37:54.000] Yeah, let's not forget the other aspect of that where if you are actually able to produce a good product that outsells the big guys [37:54.000 --> 37:58.000] and is safer than the big guys and is better for you than the big guys, [37:58.000 --> 38:05.000] then they'll still use the government as a hammer to put you out of business because you're too much competition for the big guys. [38:05.000 --> 38:07.000] Well, yeah, there's that too. [38:07.000 --> 38:08.000] Definitely. [38:08.000 --> 38:09.000] I agree. [38:09.000 --> 38:12.000] Well, let's hope gentrification becomes that. [38:12.000 --> 38:14.000] Indeed. [38:14.000 --> 38:20.000] I mean, basically what we're looking at now is a fascist state. [38:20.000 --> 38:29.000] It's a merger of the corporate with the government where basically the government protects the big corporate monopolies and the corporate cartels. [38:29.000 --> 38:31.000] It's not socialism. [38:31.000 --> 38:34.000] It's not leftism or communism by any means. [38:34.000 --> 38:39.000] It's certainly not capitalism. [38:39.000 --> 38:41.000] It's certainly very far from the free market. [38:41.000 --> 38:51.000] The only thing that it closely resembles is fascism, which is the merger of corporate and state and the government protection of monopolies and cartels. [38:51.000 --> 38:54.000] And so that's what happens when all this regulation comes in. [38:54.000 --> 39:03.000] It's really just a way to protect the big corporate monopolies and a way to stamp out the competition against them and to control the food supply. [39:03.000 --> 39:05.000] And I'm certainly not putting up with it. [39:05.000 --> 39:08.000] Anything that I can do to stop it, I'm doing. [39:08.000 --> 39:13.000] And one of the things I'm doing is supporting Stephen Rogers with gentrification as a sponsor. [39:13.000 --> 39:21.000] And I'm looking forward to participating in your products more in the future, Stephen. [39:21.000 --> 39:23.000] Well, thank you very much. [39:23.000 --> 39:24.000] Thank you. [39:24.000 --> 39:36.000] You know, it's a shame we've moved to the point now in corporatism or, as you say, fascism that we really can't fight them with our spending, our purchasing power anymore [39:36.000 --> 39:44.000] because so much of where we spend our product or spend our money has already just been bought up by them and we don't even know it. [39:44.000 --> 39:47.000] So a lot of people don't even know their nutritional products. [39:47.000 --> 39:54.000] You know, there's a few major manufacturers out there that really, you know, run this whole show. [39:54.000 --> 40:01.000] I mean, you may go into one of the stores or there's, you know, 100 different chains out there where you buy it off the shelf. [40:01.000 --> 40:08.000] But when it gets down to the manufacturing level, it's far less competitive. [40:08.000 --> 40:15.000] So Stephen, have you had any trouble as a result of this GMP or as a result of Codex Alimentarius yet? [40:15.000 --> 40:18.000] No, no, I'm compliant with everything. [40:18.000 --> 40:21.000] You know, I took care of it. [40:21.000 --> 40:25.000] I saw it coming and I said, well, you know, this thing's like a bulldozer and I'm an ant. [40:25.000 --> 40:31.000] You know, I better either get out of the way or, you know, I better do what they say do and I do. [40:31.000 --> 40:32.000] You know, I love what I do. [40:32.000 --> 40:33.000] That's the problem. [40:33.000 --> 40:36.000] And they count on all of us called creatives. [40:36.000 --> 40:37.000] You know, we love to create. [40:37.000 --> 40:38.000] We love to give. [40:38.000 --> 40:40.000] We love to do what we do. [40:40.000 --> 40:42.000] And we're going to keep doing it. [40:42.000 --> 40:48.000] You know, I'm not John Galt and I'm going to stop the motor of the world and move out in the woods somewhere in Colorado. [40:48.000 --> 40:50.000] It's just that's not feasible. [40:50.000 --> 40:51.000] People aren't going to do that. [40:51.000 --> 40:54.000] You know, we have to work. [40:54.000 --> 40:55.000] We have to get out and do what we do. [40:55.000 --> 40:58.000] You know, and I'm passionate about this so I'm going to do it. [40:58.000 --> 41:04.000] So I had to be compliant or get out of the business. [41:04.000 --> 41:05.000] Or fight them in court. [41:05.000 --> 41:07.000] I mean, fight them in court. [41:07.000 --> 41:11.000] And my business doesn't make that kind of money to fight them in court. [41:11.000 --> 41:14.000] It's hundreds of thousands of dollars once you get in there for this. [41:14.000 --> 41:18.000] So you have to have your SOPs in order, your standard operating procedures. [41:18.000 --> 41:22.000] You have to have all that in order because if the FDA or one of their contractors come in, [41:22.000 --> 41:27.000] you've got to make sure that you're compliant and you've followed all of their standard operating procedures. [41:27.000 --> 41:29.000] And as long as you do that, you're fine. [41:29.000 --> 41:32.000] Now, as far as this Codex Alimentarius and what's been split through, [41:32.000 --> 41:37.000] none of us really know because it's so ambiguous what's going to happen. [41:37.000 --> 41:39.000] We have to wait and see. [41:39.000 --> 41:42.000] And then everything could change, you know. [41:42.000 --> 41:45.000] It very well might get really bad here. [41:45.000 --> 41:46.000] Right. [41:46.000 --> 41:52.000] Well, especially because of the ambiguity, that's the part that seems so disturbing more than anything [41:52.000 --> 41:58.000] is that they're basically just leaving it open to the FDA to just do whatever they want, it would seem. [41:58.000 --> 41:59.000] It would seem. [41:59.000 --> 42:00.000] It would seem. [42:00.000 --> 42:05.000] You know, I'm hoping there are a little bit, there's some people in there that, you know, [42:05.000 --> 42:08.000] kind of think like us and that we'll stop that. [42:08.000 --> 42:14.000] You know, I can't imagine that everybody up there, when I say up there, I don't mean like higher, [42:14.000 --> 42:20.000] just, you know, the government and people that work in all these agencies, they all think alike. [42:20.000 --> 42:23.000] I'm sure there's some free thinkers in there. [42:23.000 --> 42:24.000] There has to be. [42:24.000 --> 42:26.000] There absolutely has to be. [42:26.000 --> 42:29.000] If there are, they certainly won't last long. [42:29.000 --> 42:33.000] You know, I was going to say if they are, they hide themselves [42:33.000 --> 42:41.000] and they do us favors in ways that are not so noticeable because there definitely are people [42:41.000 --> 42:44.000] that are on the inside that help us out. [42:44.000 --> 42:46.000] There's just no question about it. [42:46.000 --> 42:52.000] I mean, it's in the military, it's in the police departments, and once in a while they'll speak out, [42:52.000 --> 42:59.000] but I would say in response to what Randy said, if they speak out, they probably won't last long. [42:59.000 --> 43:05.000] But, you know, they pull little tricks and maneuvers on the inside in different ways to help us out [43:05.000 --> 43:07.000] without compromising themselves. [43:07.000 --> 43:09.000] I know that for sure. [43:09.000 --> 43:12.000] Folks, listen, we're coming up on a break. [43:12.000 --> 43:16.000] We've got one more segment with Stephen Rogers from Centrition. [43:16.000 --> 43:22.000] So if you would like to call in, 512-646-1984 to ask Stephen a question, [43:22.000 --> 43:27.000] and we'll be talking about some remedies, some possible remedies to this. [43:27.000 --> 43:33.000] Codex Alimentarius situation on the other side when we get back, as well as taking your calls. [43:33.000 --> 43:35.000] This is the rule of law. [43:35.000 --> 44:01.000] We'll be right back. [44:01.000 --> 44:05.000] Special roast hemp coffee from HempUSA.org. [44:05.000 --> 44:09.000] Our coffee grows in the dense volcanic rich soil, herbicide and pesticide free, [44:09.000 --> 44:15.000] and in the high altitudes of Guatemala in conditions that are ideal for natural growth of this high quality coffee. [44:15.000 --> 44:20.000] Try our mellow cup of coffee that is ground and roasted with 25% hemp seed from Canada. [44:20.000 --> 44:24.000] With a wonderful nutty flavor that contains 18% protein, [44:24.000 --> 44:29.000] our roasters bring a unique flavor that makes this the best cup of coffee you'll ever have. [44:29.000 --> 44:35.000] Try our new special roast hemp coffee from HempUSA.org and wake up your brain without the jitters. [44:35.000 --> 44:38.000] Our customers look forward to their next cup of hemp coffee. [44:38.000 --> 44:44.000] Visit us at HempUSA.org or call 908-691-2608. [44:44.000 --> 44:51.000] That's 908-691-2608, and see if you'll change your mind about drinking coffee again. [44:51.000 --> 44:57.000] Taste the difference, feel the difference at HempUSA.org today. [44:57.000 --> 45:15.000] If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one? [45:15.000 --> 45:21.000] If you could not wait any battle on, would you purposeless be done? [45:21.000 --> 45:27.000] Such a captain and a soldier, a warrior of love, scuffling and keeping peace. [45:27.000 --> 45:33.000] All they're taking is a misunderstanding, if somebody calls the police. [45:33.000 --> 45:48.000] Watching the sparks fly. [45:48.000 --> 45:51.000] Okay, folks, we're back. [45:51.000 --> 45:55.000] We've got one more segment with Stephen Rogers from Centrition. [45:55.000 --> 45:58.000] We're talking a little bit about the legal situation. [45:58.000 --> 46:02.000] Callers, if you'd like to call in 512-646-1984. [46:02.000 --> 46:10.000] And Stephen, you wanted to also discuss the fact that there's a whole industry out there of products [46:10.000 --> 46:17.000] that basically are synthetic forms of these herbal blends and synthetic forms of herbs. [46:17.000 --> 46:20.000] And so can you please extrapolate on that a little bit? [46:20.000 --> 46:21.000] What is that all about? [46:21.000 --> 46:26.000] Well, let me just, most nutritional products out there when they're sold, [46:26.000 --> 46:34.000] whole foods nutritional products, there's not a really big markup because, well, there is. [46:34.000 --> 46:37.000] I mean, there's considerable markup, but there's a lot of people that has to, [46:37.000 --> 46:42.000] the distributor, the retailer, the wholesaler, there's not much room in this business. [46:42.000 --> 46:46.000] That's why you won't see me on a lot of shelves, because it costs a lot to produce my product. [46:46.000 --> 46:49.000] And there's no room for a distributor to make any money. [46:49.000 --> 46:54.000] So the distributors own pretty much all the shelf space. [46:54.000 --> 46:55.000] You go to a distributor. [46:55.000 --> 46:58.000] You don't go into, like, Whole Foods and say, I want to put my product on your shelf. [46:58.000 --> 47:00.000] You go to UNFI, one of the big distributors. [47:00.000 --> 47:02.000] And so there has to be a lot of room. [47:02.000 --> 47:04.000] And there just isn't. [47:04.000 --> 47:10.000] Most people don't know this, but a pharmaceutical, usually their markup is in the thousands of percent. [47:10.000 --> 47:13.000] It can be one, two, three, four thousand percent markup. [47:13.000 --> 47:21.000] And pharmaceuticals, for the most part, are synthetic copies of botanical essences, or a lot of them are anyway. [47:21.000 --> 47:25.000] So what's happening in our business and has been happening for a long time, [47:25.000 --> 47:29.000] you're seeing less Whole Foods products and you're seeing more nutraceuticals, [47:29.000 --> 47:32.000] which are synthetic copies of botanical essences. [47:32.000 --> 47:33.000] And guess what? [47:33.000 --> 47:36.000] The reason why is because there's a lot bigger markup in it. [47:36.000 --> 47:38.000] There's a huge markup in it. [47:38.000 --> 47:45.000] If people knew what it actually took for them to make a nutraceutical and then resell it when they were making off of it, the markup, [47:45.000 --> 47:47.000] they would stop taking it just out of principle. [47:47.000 --> 47:50.000] I mean, it's crazy, the markup they're making. [47:50.000 --> 47:55.000] So there's been a lot of big grab out here in manufacturing, too, to move towards the nutraceuticals. [47:55.000 --> 47:58.000] And, you know, I've never used nutraceuticals in practice. [47:58.000 --> 48:00.000] And there are some good nutraceuticals out there. [48:00.000 --> 48:01.000] I'm not going to say they're bad. [48:01.000 --> 48:04.000] I believe that some pharmaceuticals are very helpful, too. [48:04.000 --> 48:08.000] My background is in integrative medicine. [48:08.000 --> 48:11.000] It's not, you know, I'm not too far to the right or too far to the left on that. [48:11.000 --> 48:12.000] Everything has its place. [48:12.000 --> 48:22.000] However, it looks like this, again, is just greed and gobbling up the marketplace out there and, you know, [48:22.000 --> 48:26.000] looking for a much bigger percentage by creating nutraceuticals. [48:26.000 --> 48:32.000] And so is this causing a lot of competition for the natural botanical extract products? [48:32.000 --> 48:35.000] Well, it's pushing out the competition. [48:35.000 --> 48:40.000] I mean, I just had a physician the other day in ND to stop using my product because he said, [48:40.000 --> 48:42.000] well, look at all the stuff that's in this product. [48:42.000 --> 48:44.000] I'm like, you're a natural doc. [48:44.000 --> 48:45.000] It's all synthetic. [48:45.000 --> 48:46.000] It's all nutraceuticals. [48:46.000 --> 48:49.000] And he says, yeah, but look at all of it I get. [48:49.000 --> 48:51.000] They can pack in there in one scoop. [48:51.000 --> 48:54.000] I'm like, but how much can your body really assimilate of that stuff, [48:54.000 --> 48:56.000] and is it natural for your body? [48:56.000 --> 48:57.000] Is it good? [48:57.000 --> 48:58.000] Is it okay? [48:58.000 --> 48:59.000] Maybe. [48:59.000 --> 49:00.000] I mean, I don't know. [49:00.000 --> 49:04.000] I don't know all the testing on it, but can it actually be better than the real thing [49:04.000 --> 49:09.000] that the Creator put here on the planet that our bodies are used to ingesting? [49:09.000 --> 49:11.000] I highly doubt it. [49:11.000 --> 49:14.000] But it came down to, you know, dollars and cents. [49:14.000 --> 49:16.000] You know, at the end of the day, that's what it's all about. [49:16.000 --> 49:19.000] It costs him a lot less money to put all of that stuff in that product, [49:19.000 --> 49:24.000] and he can make more money by giving it and giving it to his clients. [49:24.000 --> 49:26.000] That's too bad. [49:26.000 --> 49:27.000] That's too bad. [49:27.000 --> 49:28.000] It really is. [49:28.000 --> 49:33.000] Well, you know, I think that just on a positive note though, [49:33.000 --> 49:38.000] there is a growing community of health-conscious people that are seeing through all this, [49:38.000 --> 49:45.000] that are becoming aware because of things like aspartame and fluoride in the water [49:45.000 --> 49:50.000] and the samarasol in the vaccines and just some really glaring things out there [49:50.000 --> 49:56.000] that it's actually causing a response of people to wake up and say, wait a minute, [49:56.000 --> 50:00.000] you know, I need to be paying more attention about what I'm putting into my body here. [50:00.000 --> 50:05.000] And so even though you may have this market where you've got these, you know, [50:05.000 --> 50:10.000] maybe some masses who are somewhat dumbed down, oh, they're going to take the cheap thing [50:10.000 --> 50:14.000] or the doctors are going to, you know, pimp the cheap thing or whatever, [50:14.000 --> 50:18.000] you know, there is a growing number of people out there who are highly concerned [50:18.000 --> 50:25.000] about putting non-GMO foods into their body, organic foods and organic natural substances. [50:25.000 --> 50:31.000] I mean, it just, there's no way that these synthetic products could possibly be better [50:31.000 --> 50:32.000] than the real thing. [50:32.000 --> 50:36.000] And so I do think that that is encouraging, that there is a growing community there. [50:36.000 --> 50:42.000] And we were talking some on the break concerning some possible legal remedies [50:42.000 --> 50:45.000] to this Codex Alimentarius nightmare. [50:45.000 --> 50:51.000] And unfortunately, since it's so new, there, nothing is in practice yet. [50:51.000 --> 50:57.000] The FDA has not implemented any new regulations under this new Codex Alimentarius, [50:57.000 --> 50:59.000] so there's really nothing to sue over. [50:59.000 --> 51:00.000] No one's been harmed. [51:00.000 --> 51:03.000] No one has any standing to really do anything about it yet. [51:03.000 --> 51:06.000] So we just have to keep on our guard and keep a watch of, you know, [51:06.000 --> 51:10.000] when the other shoe is going to fall, so to speak, [51:10.000 --> 51:15.000] when they're going to try to do something about it and, you know, possibly plan ahead. [51:15.000 --> 51:20.000] And Eddie and I were discussing last night some possible remedies over this. [51:20.000 --> 51:25.000] Is to pressure our state legislatures over this [51:25.000 --> 51:28.000] and tell our state legislators we're not going to put up with this [51:28.000 --> 51:32.000] and use the nullification movement and the Tenth Amendment movement [51:32.000 --> 51:37.000] to get our state legislators to either pass laws or to not implement it. [51:37.000 --> 51:43.000] Because a lot of these federal mandates are basically unfunded federal mandates to the states. [51:43.000 --> 51:48.000] And if it's a situation where the states can just opt out, that's one thing, [51:48.000 --> 51:53.000] or we may build pressure to the legislatures to pass nullification bills against it [51:53.000 --> 51:57.000] and stuff like that that, you know, no, we're not going to let you come in [51:57.000 --> 52:01.000] and, you know, raid our health food stores over this sort of thing. [52:01.000 --> 52:05.000] So there's a number of remedies at hand that can be used [52:05.000 --> 52:08.000] depending on what they're going to do in the future. [52:08.000 --> 52:10.000] But again, it's just so new. [52:10.000 --> 52:14.000] And so just to get back to the product again, folks, [52:14.000 --> 52:18.000] this is definitely something that can help relieve the stress. [52:18.000 --> 52:22.000] And so, Stephen, would you just go over again about the product [52:22.000 --> 52:27.000] and how it was formulated and these herbs? [52:27.000 --> 52:32.000] Well, most people, if you ask them, are they under stress, they would say no, [52:32.000 --> 52:35.000] because it's really not the kind of thing that you want to admit to [52:35.000 --> 52:38.000] because we think it stresses psychological stress. [52:38.000 --> 52:42.000] We don't realize that everything, walking, breathing, talking, [52:42.000 --> 52:45.000] everything causes stress in one way or another. [52:45.000 --> 52:49.000] You know, the AMA had a study that said that the number one cause of all disease [52:49.000 --> 52:53.000] or distress or disease in the body is through stress. [52:53.000 --> 52:57.000] There's also another study that said 85% of every doctor's visit, [52:57.000 --> 53:02.000] and that's an MD, 85% are stress-related or stress-induced. [53:02.000 --> 53:04.000] So, I mean, that's huge. [53:04.000 --> 53:07.000] So that means that even though we may not be aware of it, [53:07.000 --> 53:09.000] that's what's bringing us in there. [53:09.000 --> 53:14.000] What pathogens do, along with this combination of superfoods, [53:14.000 --> 53:19.000] is they help the body deal with the negative aspects of stress. [53:19.000 --> 53:21.000] Again, we don't want stress to go away. [53:21.000 --> 53:24.000] We just want to metabolize it as anabolic, as eustress, [53:24.000 --> 53:27.000] something that we grow from and get stronger from. [53:27.000 --> 53:32.000] But if the body's weak and the body's deficient from chronic stress, [53:32.000 --> 53:37.000] then our body will begin to metabolize it as catabolic or as distress, [53:37.000 --> 53:40.000] as disease-causing and breaking us down. [53:40.000 --> 53:44.000] So that's what this product will do first and foremost, [53:44.000 --> 53:49.000] along with strengthening the energy in the body or the vital life force in the body. [53:49.000 --> 53:52.000] And I have, you know, Catherine Albrecht, she loves it. [53:52.000 --> 53:55.000] She calls it the ultimate wellness supplement. [53:55.000 --> 53:56.000] And it is. [53:56.000 --> 53:57.000] That's what it is. [53:57.000 --> 53:58.000] That's what I take. [53:58.000 --> 53:59.000] I don't take anything else. [53:59.000 --> 54:01.000] I take the ultimate wellness supplement. [54:01.000 --> 54:03.000] A lot of people do take nutraceuticals, [54:03.000 --> 54:05.000] and they'll take all of these synthetics and stuff, [54:05.000 --> 54:07.000] and say, well, look, this has so much more of this. [54:07.000 --> 54:08.000] I'm like, well, that's great. [54:08.000 --> 54:11.000] But if your body can't assimilate it, what good is it doing you? [54:11.000 --> 54:15.000] At least in my product, you're going to have a higher assimilation rate. [54:15.000 --> 54:17.000] I mean, the stuff is bioavailable. [54:17.000 --> 54:19.000] When you take it, you're going to feel it. [54:19.000 --> 54:23.000] If you can take those nutraceuticals and feel it afterwards, you're fine. [54:23.000 --> 54:25.000] But I doubt you can. [54:25.000 --> 54:26.000] Exactly. [54:26.000 --> 54:32.000] And I think the assimilation is the key here because it's pretty well known. [54:32.000 --> 54:35.000] Well, I mean, just like say for multivitamins, for example, [54:35.000 --> 54:39.000] I mean, you read the list of all the vitamins in the multivitamin. [54:39.000 --> 54:42.000] We've got this really like this one little tiny multivitamin, [54:42.000 --> 54:45.000] and it says it has like 100 vitamins in it. [54:45.000 --> 54:49.000] It's everything you need, you know, your recommended daily dosage [54:49.000 --> 54:52.000] or whatever recommended daily amount, the RDA. [54:52.000 --> 54:55.000] And I've got to tell you, well, for one thing, to digress on that, [54:55.000 --> 55:01.000] the RDA, the government RDA is not the recommended amount for you to be healthy. [55:01.000 --> 55:04.000] Like say, for example, the RDA for vitamin C, [55:04.000 --> 55:07.000] that's not the amount of vitamin C that your body really needs to be healthy. [55:07.000 --> 55:14.000] That's just barely the amount of vitamin C that you need to not get scurvy. [55:14.000 --> 55:18.000] Okay, so I don't really pay much attention to those RDAs anyway, [55:18.000 --> 55:21.000] but the point is it's all synthetic materials, [55:21.000 --> 55:23.000] and then they compact it in this little pill, [55:23.000 --> 55:29.000] and it's been proven that your body just hardly assimilates any of it at all. [55:29.000 --> 55:34.000] And so you have to look not just necessarily at, you know, the bang for the buck, [55:34.000 --> 55:38.000] so to speak, of how much you're getting, but, you know, the quality. [55:38.000 --> 55:43.000] It's about quality, and how is it really going to affect your health, [55:43.000 --> 55:47.000] and how is it really going to improve your state of wellness [55:47.000 --> 55:50.000] and your state of balance, as you say. [55:50.000 --> 55:53.000] Right, and you know, most of our macronutrients and micronutrients [55:53.000 --> 55:57.000] we should be getting from a whole food balanced diet. [55:57.000 --> 56:00.000] I say it's a supplement, and that's what it is. [56:00.000 --> 56:04.000] It's the supplement, you're a really good healthy diet. [56:04.000 --> 56:07.000] We should never take these products in place of that. [56:07.000 --> 56:13.000] And anyone who's interested, and we do, if they go on our Web site, [56:13.000 --> 56:17.000] we offer downloadable DVDs there and CDs, [56:17.000 --> 56:23.000] and they can find out how to eat a holistic balanced diet there on our Web site. [56:23.000 --> 56:25.000] Yeah, and that's the key. [56:25.000 --> 56:28.000] Yeah, I mean, you've got to get it through diet first. [56:28.000 --> 56:33.000] Absolutely, and I encourage folks to seek out your local farmer's markets. [56:33.000 --> 56:37.000] Where you live, there's a farmer's market every Saturday here in Austin. [56:37.000 --> 56:40.000] You know, eat holistic foods. [56:40.000 --> 56:42.000] Eat organic foods when you can. [56:42.000 --> 56:47.000] Try to avoid processed foods, because you're going to flood your body [56:47.000 --> 56:51.000] with bisphenol A and all these horrible chemicals, [56:51.000 --> 56:56.000] and it's just going to take that much more of your energy as you're saying, [56:56.000 --> 57:02.000] as you were talking about earlier, Stephen, to maintain that homeostasis. [57:02.000 --> 57:06.000] Whereas when you have an organic diet and a holistic diet, [57:06.000 --> 57:09.000] and a lot of people eat a macrobiotic diet, [57:09.000 --> 57:13.000] which means that everything is all pH balanced and stuff like that, [57:13.000 --> 57:18.000] then you won't have to use so much of your life energy to maintain that homeostasis. [57:18.000 --> 57:21.000] And so then when you take products like centrician, [57:21.000 --> 57:25.000] it's just going to bring your overall state of health and wellness to the next level. [57:25.000 --> 57:29.000] Definitely, and as you said, life force is really the key. [57:29.000 --> 57:35.000] In classical Chinese medicine, the abundant and unimpeded flow of life force [57:35.000 --> 57:39.000] is the key to health and all the operating or the optimum functioning [57:39.000 --> 57:44.000] of the 11 systems of the body, whether it be the reproductive, cardio. [57:44.000 --> 57:49.000] All these systems depend on abundant chi flowing through all the acupuncture [57:49.000 --> 57:52.000] meridians and the cells and tissues of the body. [57:52.000 --> 57:56.000] And when we're stressed or under chronic stress, it gets depleted. [57:56.000 --> 57:58.000] And people say, well, how do I know I'm under stress, [57:58.000 --> 58:00.000] or how do I know my chi is depleted? [58:00.000 --> 58:05.000] If you drink coffee, you can't get up in the morning, your chi is depleted. [58:05.000 --> 58:07.000] It's already depleted. [58:07.000 --> 58:10.000] What were you saying that if you drink coffee and you can't get up in the morning? [58:10.000 --> 58:14.000] If you drink coffee, if you drink coffee in the morning, that means that your body is depleted [58:14.000 --> 58:18.000] and coffee stimulates stress hormones to give you a pep. [58:18.000 --> 58:20.000] The body is already in a deficit. [58:20.000 --> 58:22.000] Right, exactly. [58:22.000 --> 58:26.000] All right, well, listen, Stephen, thank you so much for joining us tonight. [58:26.000 --> 58:28.000] We really appreciate it. [58:28.000 --> 58:30.000] Thank you very much for having me. [58:30.000 --> 58:33.000] Okay, folks, and again, you can find out more about centrician. [58:33.000 --> 58:35.000] Go to ruleoflawradio.com. [58:35.000 --> 58:38.000] And right below the list of the broadcasters in the schedule, [58:38.000 --> 58:42.000] you'll see the big green banner, feel more energy and less stress. [58:42.000 --> 58:45.000] And you can find out more about centrician and place your order. [58:45.000 --> 58:50.000] And your order will support this network and this radio show. [58:50.000 --> 58:52.000] Thank you very much, Stephen. [58:52.000 --> 58:53.000] Hey, thank you. [58:53.000 --> 58:54.000] I look forward to being on again. [58:54.000 --> 58:56.000] Okay, absolutely. [58:56.000 --> 58:58.000] We'll be back right after the top of the hour news. [58:58.000 --> 59:00.000] This is the Rule of Law. [59:00.000 --> 59:08.000] More energy, stronger immune power, improved sense of well-being. [59:08.000 --> 59:12.000] How many supplements have you heard boast of these benefits? [59:12.000 --> 59:15.000] The team behind centrician believes that supplements should [59:15.000 --> 59:18.000] over-deliver on their promises. [59:18.000 --> 59:21.000] And centrician does just that. [59:21.000 --> 59:25.000] Centrician utilizes the ancient healing wisdom of Chinese medicine. [59:25.000 --> 59:28.000] In conjunction with the science of modern nutrition, [59:28.000 --> 59:31.000] adaptogenic herbs serve as the healing component. [59:31.000 --> 59:38.000] And organic hemp protein in greens and superfoods act as a balanced nutrient base. [59:38.000 --> 59:42.000] Plus, centrician tastes great in just water. [59:42.000 --> 59:45.000] This powder supplement is everything you'd want in a product. [59:45.000 --> 59:48.000] And it's all natural. [59:48.000 --> 59:56.000] Visit centrician.com to order yours or call 1-866-497-7436. [59:56.000 --> 01:00:00.000] After you use centrician, you'll believe in supplements again. [01:00:00.000 --> 01:00:05.000] This news brief brought to you by the International News Net. [01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:08.000] The U.S. Central Command has proposed supplying Yemen [01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:13.000] with $1.2 billion in military equipment and training over the next six years, [01:00:13.000 --> 01:00:16.000] a significant escalation in the campaign against terrorism. [01:00:16.000 --> 01:00:20.000] Opponents fear U.S. weapons could be used against political enemies [01:00:20.000 --> 01:00:23.000] of President Ali Abdullah Saleh [01:00:23.000 --> 01:00:30.000] and provoke a backlash that could further destabilize the volatile impoverished country. [01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:36.000] Venezuelan author Eva Gohlinger claims the U.S. Agency of International Development [01:00:36.000 --> 01:00:40.000] is part of a U.S. counterinsurgency campaign, [01:00:40.000 --> 01:00:43.000] saying documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act [01:00:43.000 --> 01:00:49.000] reveal the sole intention of setting up the USAID office in Venezuela [01:00:49.000 --> 01:00:56.000] was to aid opposition forces in ousting President Hilo Chavez from power. [01:00:56.000 --> 01:01:00.000] Louisiana state officials say there's not enough money left to complete construction [01:01:00.000 --> 01:01:02.000] of the New Orleans levy system. [01:01:02.000 --> 01:01:06.000] Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Chairman Garrett Graves [01:01:06.000 --> 01:01:11.000] said Wednesday the Army Corps of Engineers will be short $1 billion. [01:01:11.000 --> 01:01:15.000] The state has also yet to be reimbursed by BP [01:01:15.000 --> 01:01:22.000] for the six miles of sand berms built to block oil from spoiling Gulf wetlands. [01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:26.000] Top Afghanistan commander General David Petraeus said [01:01:26.000 --> 01:01:30.000] night raids by U.S. special forces from May through July [01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:34.000] killed or captured 365 insurgent leaders [01:01:34.000 --> 01:01:39.000] and killed 1,031 Taliban rank-and-file fighters. [01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:43.000] Those figures were widely reported as highlighting the successes [01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:46.000] of special forces raids against the Taliban. [01:01:46.000 --> 01:01:50.000] But the stepped-up night raids in Kandahar province [01:01:50.000 --> 01:01:54.000] were matched by a sharp fall-off in the number of roadside bombs [01:01:54.000 --> 01:01:59.000] turned in by the local population, indicating the raids had backfired badly. [01:01:59.000 --> 01:02:04.000] Night raids, which are viewed as a violation of the sanctity of the home [01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:07.000] and generate large numbers of civilian casualties, [01:02:07.000 --> 01:02:13.000] are the single biggest factor in generating popular anger at U.S. and NATO forces. [01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:19.000] Khalil al-Tafakshi, head of the maps and colonies department in East Jerusalem, [01:02:19.000 --> 01:02:24.000] says Israelis never actually cease construction on the West Bank or in East Jerusalem [01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:28.000] and the number of home units in these areas has grown dramatically [01:02:28.000 --> 01:02:30.000] during the so-called moratorium. [01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:34.000] Al-Tafakshi says the population of the Jewish West Bank colonies [01:02:34.000 --> 01:02:38.000] was less than 300,000 people the day the moratorium was imposed [01:02:38.000 --> 01:02:41.000] and now the number has risen to 320,000. [01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:46.000] The Israeli population of occupied East Jerusalem was 193,000 [01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:51.000] the day the moratorium was imposed and today the number exceeds 200,000. [01:02:51.000 --> 01:03:17.000] Al-Tafakshi said there was no mechanism to monitor construction in the colonies. [01:03:17.000 --> 01:03:21.000] Yes! [01:03:21.000 --> 01:03:26.000] They want to chop down Babylon and burn down the whole nation [01:03:26.000 --> 01:03:29.000] but they don't want to make the land run. [01:03:29.000 --> 01:03:32.000] How much for the republicans and the ospreys, man? [01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:34.000] Tell them I'm in the back area. [01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:36.000] They say we're going to lose, but we're going to win. [01:03:36.000 --> 01:03:37.000] Come on! [01:03:37.000 --> 01:04:00.000] Alright, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio. [01:04:00.000 --> 01:04:03.000] Eddie Craig, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens. [01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:07.000] Okay, we're going to go ahead and open up the phone lines for those of you [01:04:07.000 --> 01:04:11.000] that have any questions, call-ins, comments or anything like that [01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:14.000] that you may want to have done, please get ready to do that. [01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:17.000] And while we're waiting on the phone bridge to get some folks on it, [01:04:17.000 --> 01:04:21.000] there is a piece of legislation that I've been working on this week [01:04:21.000 --> 01:04:24.000] that I want to give a basic introduction to. [01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:28.000] And the name of this act is going to be called [01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:33.000] the Judicially Usurped Standards of Total Immunity Challenge and Eradication Act, [01:04:33.000 --> 01:04:35.000] known as the Justice Act. [01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:41.000] The purpose of this act is to redefine government immunity. [01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:44.000] No more government immunity granted by government employees [01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:47.000] and government courts to protect them in their actions. [01:04:47.000 --> 01:04:51.000] The purpose of this act is to specifically outline the situations [01:04:51.000 --> 01:04:55.000] under which immunity exists and when it does not. [01:04:55.000 --> 01:05:02.000] And the penalties for any government official for violations of any of the laws [01:05:02.000 --> 01:05:09.000] and the rules they're supposed to be abiding by in the name of their job. [01:05:09.000 --> 01:05:14.000] One of the basic things this act defines is that no public servant is authorized [01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:20.000] to violate the law in order to enforce the law. [01:05:20.000 --> 01:05:25.000] So when it gets down into the nitty-gritty details, this is going to take away [01:05:25.000 --> 01:05:32.000] a lot of their ability to pursue acts of entrapment, [01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:38.000] to arrest without warrant in cases other than felonies and breach of the peace. [01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:43.000] It's going to take away their ability to basically do anything [01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:51.000] that the constitutions respectively or the laws that are in compliance with the constitutions respectively [01:05:51.000 --> 01:05:57.000] do not specifically authorize. [01:05:57.000 --> 01:06:01.000] Right now, I hopefully have it pretty comprehensive. [01:06:01.000 --> 01:06:07.000] Now that I've got the outline of it done the way that I want it, it's going to go through, [01:06:07.000 --> 01:06:14.000] and I'm going to try to make it more brief but still very direct in what it says [01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:17.000] so that it's not subject to bad interpretation. [01:06:17.000 --> 01:06:24.000] Now one of the things that people would find interesting in this is that this particular act [01:06:24.000 --> 01:06:30.000] contains a specific definition of what constitutes a crime. [01:06:30.000 --> 01:06:36.000] Another thing that this contains is a specific definition of person. [01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:43.000] And it stipulates that, and this is a chapter that's to be added to the Texas Government Code. [01:06:43.000 --> 01:06:47.000] Currently there is no Chapter 2 in the Texas Government Code. [01:06:47.000 --> 01:06:50.000] It goes from 1 to 21. [01:06:50.000 --> 01:06:52.000] There's nothing in between. [01:06:52.000 --> 01:06:56.000] And if there is, it's certainly not printed on the government website. [01:06:56.000 --> 01:07:02.000] So if there isn't an actual Chapter 2 that we have in existence anywhere, [01:07:02.000 --> 01:07:07.000] then this is going to be enacted as a new Chapter 2 to the Government Code. [01:07:07.000 --> 01:07:17.000] And it will supersede certain portions of the Code Construction Act the way that I've got it written. [01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:22.000] So this should be interesting for you. [01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:27.000] Let's take a look at what a public servant is in this thing. [01:07:27.000 --> 01:07:32.000] A public servant shall mean a person elected, selected, appointed, employed, [01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:36.000] or otherwise designated as one of the following, [01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:41.000] even if he has not yet qualified for office or assumed the duties thereof, [01:07:41.000 --> 01:07:49.000] an officer, employee, or agent of government, or a juror or grand juror, [01:07:49.000 --> 01:07:57.000] or an arbitrator, referee, or other person who is authorized by law [01:07:57.000 --> 01:08:02.000] or private written agreement to hear or determine a cause or controversy, [01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:09.000] or an attorney at law, or a notary public when participating in the performance [01:08:09.000 --> 01:08:15.000] of a governmental function, or a candidate for nomination or election to public office, [01:08:15.000 --> 01:08:20.000] or a person who is performing a governmental function under a claim of right, [01:08:20.000 --> 01:08:23.000] although he is not legally qualified to do so, [01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:29.000] or a person who is the officer of any publicly traded legal entity [01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:36.000] and who performs any act in an official capacity within the territorial boundaries of Texas. [01:08:36.000 --> 01:08:42.000] Now, the attorney at law and the person who is an officer of a publicly traded corporation [01:08:42.000 --> 01:08:48.000] are my additions to the penal code's definition of public servant. [01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:49.000] Okay? [01:08:49.000 --> 01:08:51.000] Everything else is what's already in the penal code. [01:08:51.000 --> 01:08:53.000] I just added those two. [01:08:53.000 --> 01:09:00.000] And since a publicly traded corporation owes a duty to the public in what it does, [01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:05.000] then the officers of that corporation, even though it's privately owned, [01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:08.000] are to be acting in the public interest. [01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:10.000] They're not allowed to defraud the public. [01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:12.000] They're not allowed to mislead the public. [01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:19.000] They're not allowed to violate the laws any more than any other public servant would be. [01:09:19.000 --> 01:09:24.000] So in a publicly traded corporation, the officers are public servants. [01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:29.000] This should do away with a lot of those things like Enron and World Net [01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:32.000] and all those other, or WorldCom, sorry, [01:09:32.000 --> 01:09:37.000] that stole all the money from the people through investments and such. [01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:41.000] This would land them directly, squarely under the same penalties [01:09:41.000 --> 01:09:48.000] as other government officials for violations of the laws in the Constitution. [01:09:48.000 --> 01:09:53.000] Now, since every attorney with a bar card is a judicial officer [01:09:53.000 --> 01:09:57.000] under the judicial branch of government according to the Texas Constitution, [01:09:57.000 --> 01:10:01.000] it's only fair that they be named as a public servant as well. [01:10:01.000 --> 01:10:07.000] That once again will also bring to light the illegality of the bar here in Texas. [01:10:07.000 --> 01:10:14.000] And I'm working on another piece of legislation to do away with the bar. [01:10:14.000 --> 01:10:21.000] Now, the definition of a private capacity and official capacity I've also defined in this, [01:10:21.000 --> 01:10:25.000] and you'll find this kind of interesting. [01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:31.000] Official capacity shall mean acting as a person on behalf of a legal entity, [01:10:31.000 --> 01:10:34.000] but the term shall expressly exclude from its interpretation [01:10:34.000 --> 01:10:40.000] and use the terms man or men acting in a private capacity. [01:10:40.000 --> 01:10:43.000] Now, let's look at what private capacity is. [01:10:43.000 --> 01:10:49.000] Private capacity shall mean one or more men acting on or in their own behalf or interest [01:10:49.000 --> 01:10:55.000] and not in an official capacity pursuant the Ninth Article of Amendment of the Constitution [01:10:55.000 --> 01:10:58.000] for the United States of America. [01:10:58.000 --> 01:11:00.000] Okay? [01:11:00.000 --> 01:11:05.000] So those are the different types of things I'm going at in this particular thing here. [01:11:05.000 --> 01:11:10.000] I am basically re-declaring the people's right to the common law [01:11:10.000 --> 01:11:13.000] to hold their public servants accountable, [01:11:13.000 --> 01:11:17.000] that the public servants may not give immunity to themselves [01:11:17.000 --> 01:11:21.000] because the people did not grant them immunity for anything. [01:11:21.000 --> 01:11:29.000] All this argument the courts have basically cooked up regarding the 11th Amendment is baloney. [01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:34.000] Nowhere in the 11th Amendment does the word give immunity to public servants. [01:11:34.000 --> 01:11:37.000] That does not appear in the 11th Amendment. [01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:45.000] It's inferred to one degree only that the public servant is immune or the state itself, [01:11:45.000 --> 01:11:54.000] not the public servant, but the state itself as a political body is immune from suit from any other state, [01:11:54.000 --> 01:12:03.000] the citizens of any other state or the federal government or any foreign nation. [01:12:03.000 --> 01:12:10.000] The state is not immune, nor are the public servants of the state immune, [01:12:10.000 --> 01:12:15.000] from actions brought by the people of that state. [01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:17.000] That is not spoken of anywhere. [01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:19.000] So Eddie, you bring up a good point. [01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:25.000] If the states are immune from lawsuit from other states or from the federal government, [01:12:25.000 --> 01:12:29.000] then what's up with the federal government suing Arizona? [01:12:29.000 --> 01:12:31.000] They shouldn't even be able to do that. [01:12:31.000 --> 01:12:33.000] They didn't sue Arizona. [01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:39.000] They sued specific officers of Arizona, which essentially is the same thing [01:12:39.000 --> 01:12:47.000] because the federal government can't sue any of the political offices of the states. [01:12:47.000 --> 01:12:58.000] That's forbidden in the federal Constitution under the 11th Amendment. [01:12:58.000 --> 01:12:59.000] All right. [01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:05.000] We've got some callers on the line, but before we go to the callers, Randy, you got any comments on this? [01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:13.000] One point, when you were talking about corporate officers, [01:13:13.000 --> 01:13:22.000] since we're being forced into a fascist state where the large corporations essentially run the government, [01:13:22.000 --> 01:13:30.000] it seems most appropriate that they should be thrown in the trough for the rest of the scoundrels. [01:13:30.000 --> 01:13:33.000] Well, that thought occurred to me as well. [01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:38.000] But I just figured that the best argument that I could make was that when they are publicly traded, [01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:44.000] they owe a duty to the public, just like any public servant does. [01:13:44.000 --> 01:13:52.000] And because they're under the control of the government of the state as a corporation created by the laws, [01:13:52.000 --> 01:13:56.000] then they have to abide by them just as much as anyone else does. [01:13:56.000 --> 01:14:00.000] And the fact that they use them to violate the Constitution or the rights of the people [01:14:00.000 --> 01:14:06.000] should make them just as accountable as we should be able to hold the public servants to. [01:14:06.000 --> 01:14:13.000] That's my opinion, but I honestly believe that's the way we ought to be able to do it. [01:14:13.000 --> 01:14:16.000] No more hiding behind the corporate veil. [01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:18.000] There's no immunity for public servants. [01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:22.000] There is no immunity for corporate officers. [01:14:22.000 --> 01:14:28.000] There is no immunity just because you're hiding behind a corporate veil. [01:14:28.000 --> 01:14:37.000] Your actions are just as punishable no matter where you sit. [01:14:37.000 --> 01:14:44.000] I don't think there is an immunity for corporate officers other than what they pay for. [01:14:44.000 --> 01:14:48.000] Well, it shields their assets and them from direct liability. [01:14:48.000 --> 01:14:50.000] That's what the corporate veil does. [01:14:50.000 --> 01:14:51.000] That's all it does. [01:14:51.000 --> 01:14:55.000] You can sue the corporation, but you can't sue the individual behind it [01:14:55.000 --> 01:15:00.000] without direct evidence that they did something involved in it. [01:15:00.000 --> 01:15:05.000] But the fact of the matter is, how does a corporation function to do what it does, [01:15:05.000 --> 01:15:12.000] legal or illegal, without the knowledge, consent, and manipulation of its officers? [01:15:12.000 --> 01:15:19.000] It's idiotic to argue that a corporation can do anything on its own. [01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:25.000] It can only do what the people that work in it and control it do. [01:15:25.000 --> 01:15:30.000] So responde superior should always go to the top. [01:15:30.000 --> 01:15:31.000] Exactly. [01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:34.000] It goes to the law of crudulence. [01:15:34.000 --> 01:15:37.000] Crud always sinks to the top. [01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:41.000] Yeah, and also it goes to the law of gun no kill, man kills. [01:15:41.000 --> 01:15:43.000] I mean, you can't blame the gun. [01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:45.000] It's the man that pulled the trigger. [01:15:45.000 --> 01:15:50.000] The corporation can't do anything without the officers making the decisions. [01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:52.000] I mean, it's a fictitious entity. [01:15:52.000 --> 01:15:56.000] Exactly. [01:15:56.000 --> 01:16:01.000] So just like anyone else, their asset should be able to be forfeited. [01:16:01.000 --> 01:16:04.000] Their person should be able to be arrested. [01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:08.000] They should be able to be charged with any criminal act just as anyone else did [01:16:08.000 --> 01:16:14.000] because it's impossible for the corporation to do it. [01:16:14.000 --> 01:16:19.000] Well, I don't know about their personal assets, but certainly criminally charged, yes. [01:16:19.000 --> 01:16:20.000] Well, but think about it, Debra. [01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:26.000] Now, if you told, let's say, for instance, you work for a large chemical corporation, [01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:32.000] very dangerous, highly hazardous chemicals, and you have a fleet of tanker trucks [01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:35.000] that are supposed to haul this material around. [01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:37.000] Well, I'll pick this up on the other side. [01:16:37.000 --> 01:16:38.000] I hear the great music. [01:16:38.000 --> 01:16:41.000] So folks, if you all hang in there, we'll pick this up on the other side, [01:16:41.000 --> 01:16:43.000] and then we'll start getting into your phone calls. [01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:46.000] This is rule of all radio. [01:16:46.000 --> 01:16:47.000] We got Paul from Mississippi. [01:16:47.000 --> 01:16:48.000] Mike from Texas just called in. [01:16:48.000 --> 01:16:50.000] Looks like he dropped off the line. [01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:53.000] So please call back in, Mike and Jeff. [01:16:53.000 --> 01:17:03.000] We'll be right back. [01:17:03.000 --> 01:17:06.000] Capital Coin and Bullion is your local force for rare coins, precious metals, [01:17:06.000 --> 01:17:09.000] and coin supplies in the Austin metro area. [01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:10.000] We also ship worldwide. [01:17:10.000 --> 01:17:14.000] We are a family-owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin [01:17:14.000 --> 01:17:15.000] and metal purchases. [01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:20.000] We buy, sell, trade, and confine rare coins, gold, and silver coin collections, [01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:21.000] precious metals, and scrap gold. [01:17:21.000 --> 01:17:23.000] We purchase and sell gold and jewelry items. [01:17:23.000 --> 01:17:26.000] We offer daily specials on coins and bullion. [01:17:26.000 --> 01:17:31.000] We are located at 5448 Burnett Road, Suite 3, at the corner of Burnett and Shulmark. [01:17:31.000 --> 01:17:35.000] And we're open Mondays and Fridays, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 5. [01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:38.000] You are welcome to stop in our shop during regular business hours [01:17:38.000 --> 01:17:43.000] or call 512-646-6440 with any questions. [01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:47.000] Ask for Chad and say you heard about us on Google Law Radio or Texas Liberty Radio. [01:17:47.000 --> 01:17:50.000] That's Capital Coin and Bullion at the corner of Burnett and Shulmark. [01:17:50.000 --> 01:17:54.000] And we're open Mondays and Fridays, 10 to 6, Saturdays, 10 to 5. [01:17:54.000 --> 01:18:05.000] That's Capital Coin and Bullion, 512-646-6440. [01:18:05.000 --> 01:18:29.000] All right, folks, this is Rule of Law Radio. [01:18:29.000 --> 01:18:30.000] We are back. [01:18:30.000 --> 01:18:33.000] Okay, just to pick this up real quick and get it out of the way [01:18:33.000 --> 01:18:35.000] so we can get to the callers. [01:18:35.000 --> 01:18:38.000] Say, for instance, you have a big chemical corporation. [01:18:38.000 --> 01:18:41.000] You have a fleet of trucks, and these trucks haul these dangerous, [01:18:41.000 --> 01:18:46.000] highly dangerous toxic chemicals all over the place for your company. [01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:52.000] And you as one of the officers of this corporation knows that in order to save money, [01:18:52.000 --> 01:18:57.000] you've ordered that maintenance on these trucks be cut down to the bare minimum [01:18:57.000 --> 01:19:00.000] to the point where the trucks are actually unsafe. [01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:02.000] And you're fully aware of this. [01:19:02.000 --> 01:19:08.000] And this vehicle goes out and has an accident or causes an accident or breaks down in such a way [01:19:08.000 --> 01:19:12.000] as these chemicals are released into the public and cause a harm. [01:19:12.000 --> 01:19:19.000] Why should the stockholders of the corporation be made liable for this particular officer's choice [01:19:19.000 --> 01:19:25.000] to save money by cutting back on the maintenance that he was responsible for having done? [01:19:25.000 --> 01:19:26.000] You see what I'm saying? [01:19:26.000 --> 01:19:29.000] You're punishing everybody that invested in the corporation [01:19:29.000 --> 01:19:34.000] instead of the guy that made the choice and the decision to put the corporation at risk. [01:19:34.000 --> 01:19:35.000] Right. [01:19:35.000 --> 01:19:38.000] Well, and also, you know, the reason I was starting to balk [01:19:38.000 --> 01:19:42.000] is because I was considering other entities like trusts where, you know, [01:19:42.000 --> 01:19:47.000] we have to be careful what we wish for because if we remove the veil in every situation, [01:19:47.000 --> 01:19:50.000] then that means we can't set up entities to protect ourselves either. [01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:56.000] And like in the situation with trusts, the trustees are not personally liable for the decisions [01:19:56.000 --> 01:19:59.000] that they make as officers of the trust. [01:19:59.000 --> 01:20:03.000] But, you know, as we were discussing this on the break, you said that that's a different animal [01:20:03.000 --> 01:20:07.000] because trusts are generally not incorporated entities. [01:20:07.000 --> 01:20:11.000] They're not publicly traded corporate entities that are incorporated. [01:20:11.000 --> 01:20:13.000] They don't have a public interface. [01:20:13.000 --> 01:20:17.000] A trust is almost always set up for a private interest, [01:20:17.000 --> 01:20:20.000] and really the only thing it does is manage funds and assets. [01:20:20.000 --> 01:20:22.000] It doesn't conduct a business. [01:20:22.000 --> 01:20:24.000] Right, right. [01:20:24.000 --> 01:20:29.000] And it most assuredly does not conduct a business for profit. [01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:30.000] Right. [01:20:30.000 --> 01:20:33.000] It may earn interest on investments and things like that, [01:20:33.000 --> 01:20:35.000] but again, that's the investment side. [01:20:35.000 --> 01:20:36.000] It's not the controlling side. [01:20:36.000 --> 01:20:37.000] Right. [01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:41.000] So that would, to me, would be the major difference between them. [01:20:41.000 --> 01:20:42.000] Okay. [01:20:42.000 --> 01:20:43.000] All right. [01:20:43.000 --> 01:20:47.000] Well, y'all ready to start taking the calls? [01:20:47.000 --> 01:20:48.000] I'm game. [01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:49.000] Here we go. [01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:52.000] We're going to first time caller Paul in Mississippi. [01:20:52.000 --> 01:20:54.000] Thanks for calling in. [01:20:54.000 --> 01:20:55.000] What's on your mind tonight? [01:20:55.000 --> 01:20:56.000] Thank you, Debra. [01:20:56.000 --> 01:21:00.000] I have a chicken dance story for Randy. [01:21:00.000 --> 01:21:05.000] Just a brief history on what's going on here. [01:21:05.000 --> 01:21:11.000] A friend of mine was ticketed three and a half years ago for illegal hunting [01:21:11.000 --> 01:21:15.000] and hunting after hours. [01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:22.000] His addiction was challenged with a bill of particulars, but the judge found him [01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:29.000] guilty anyway and fined him, I think, $3,500 and gave him 30 days to appeal. [01:21:29.000 --> 01:21:36.000] And fast forward to today, wondering if there was a warrant out for his arrest. [01:21:36.000 --> 01:21:38.000] He never paid the fine. [01:21:38.000 --> 01:21:47.000] I went to the Justice Court clerk today, this morning, and requested the court [01:21:47.000 --> 01:21:52.000] documents, the file, and my request was denied. [01:21:52.000 --> 01:22:01.000] Well, at that point, the facility there, it was a brand new facility. [01:22:01.000 --> 01:22:06.000] The sheriff's office shares one end of the building. [01:22:06.000 --> 01:22:12.000] The other end is the Justice Court office, and out back is a 40-acre prison. [01:22:12.000 --> 01:22:18.000] They've got the express lane set up to arrest, convict, and imprison everybody [01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:21.000] in Lafour County, Mississippi. [01:22:21.000 --> 01:22:28.000] So when the court refused to let me see the court files, I went and got a [01:22:28.000 --> 01:22:32.000] deputy and said, arrest her. [01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:37.000] Well, this deputy, I guess he was kind of down on the totem pole. [01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:38.000] He escorted me. [01:22:38.000 --> 01:22:40.000] He said, come on, follow me. [01:22:40.000 --> 01:22:44.000] He took me down the hall, down another hall to the, I've never heard this one [01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:49.000] before, to the undersheriff, and I introduced myself to the undersheriff and [01:22:49.000 --> 01:22:54.000] told him that I just witnessed a crime and said, go arrest her. [01:22:54.000 --> 01:22:56.000] And well, he started quizzing me. [01:22:56.000 --> 01:22:57.000] Who are you? [01:22:57.000 --> 01:23:00.000] Well, I had already introduced myself. [01:23:00.000 --> 01:23:02.000] Where are you from? [01:23:02.000 --> 01:23:08.000] Well, sir, with all due respect, I don't think that has any bearing on what's [01:23:08.000 --> 01:23:09.000] happening here. [01:23:09.000 --> 01:23:11.000] What kind of work do you do? [01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:14.000] Well, sir, the kind of work I do isn't important here. [01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:15.000] I just witnessed a crime. [01:23:15.000 --> 01:23:17.000] Go arrest her. [01:23:17.000 --> 01:23:24.000] Well, he mumbled something about the Attorney General, and then I said, well, [01:23:24.000 --> 01:23:29.000] I just called 911 to have this documented, and they have signs all over [01:23:29.000 --> 01:23:31.000] the front of the entrance there. [01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:32.000] It says no cell phones. [01:23:32.000 --> 01:23:35.000] I guess it probably rang. [01:23:35.000 --> 01:23:37.000] I'm not sure if it rang or not. [01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:42.000] But he said, take your phone call outside and, Deputy, escort him to the door. [01:23:42.000 --> 01:23:50.000] And I'll pause there for Randy, if you have any words of wisdom. [01:23:50.000 --> 01:23:54.000] Well, it sounds like obstruction of justice on their part. [01:23:54.000 --> 01:23:57.000] Sounds like interfering with a 911 call too. [01:23:57.000 --> 01:24:00.000] Big time. [01:24:00.000 --> 01:24:02.000] So file on them. [01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:11.000] It's better if you file against the one who protected the one who did it, [01:24:11.000 --> 01:24:16.000] because you bet. [01:24:16.000 --> 01:24:20.000] Then you go to the district attorney, the prosecutor attorney, and you file [01:24:20.000 --> 01:24:25.000] against the officer with the prosecutor attorney, depending on what your [01:24:25.000 --> 01:24:31.000] statutes are, shielding from prosecution, obstruction of justice, tampering [01:24:31.000 --> 01:24:34.000] with a witness. [01:24:34.000 --> 01:24:37.000] They force you to leave in Texas. [01:24:37.000 --> 01:24:38.000] There's a statute. [01:24:38.000 --> 01:24:43.000] I once had a judge run into the district court while I was talking to the [01:24:43.000 --> 01:24:48.000] bailiff, tell me to point his finger at me and said, Mr. Kelton, you're [01:24:48.000 --> 01:24:49.000] creating a disturbance. [01:24:49.000 --> 01:24:53.000] You get out of this courthouse or I'll have you arrested. [01:24:53.000 --> 01:24:56.000] Well, he didn't know that I was talking to the bailiff because the high [01:24:56.000 --> 01:25:00.000] sheriff of the county sent me to the bailiff to make a complaint against the [01:25:00.000 --> 01:25:01.000] district attorney. [01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:08.000] Well, in Texas there is a statute that says that if you threaten someone for [01:25:08.000 --> 01:25:13.000] the purpose of denying them access to a public building or for the purpose of [01:25:13.000 --> 01:25:20.000] interrupting their access to a public building, that's a terroristic threat. [01:25:20.000 --> 01:25:24.000] And I filed that with the attorney general here in Texas, and that was a [01:25:24.000 --> 01:25:27.000] hoot. [01:25:27.000 --> 01:25:31.000] This is the first time that I've tried something like this today, and yeah, [01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:32.000] it was a hoot. [01:25:32.000 --> 01:25:35.000] It was an adrenaline rush, and afterwards I really couldn't believe that I'd [01:25:35.000 --> 01:25:38.000] done it. [01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:40.000] A couple questions here. [01:25:40.000 --> 01:25:46.000] The bill of particulars that was filed and an attempt was made to stand and [01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:51.000] have them prove jurisdiction, well, they just railroaded this guy after the [01:25:51.000 --> 01:25:52.000] bill of particulars. [01:25:52.000 --> 01:25:56.000] Do you have any thoughts on... [01:25:56.000 --> 01:25:58.000] Here's what we did. [01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:03.000] Here's my position on subject matter jurisdiction. [01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:08.000] If the court didn't have subject matter jurisdiction, then it wasn't the [01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:11.000] court. [01:26:11.000 --> 01:26:16.000] Okay, if I go down to the uniform store and I rent myself a uniform and get me [01:26:16.000 --> 01:26:21.000] a shiny little badge and a bubblegum machine, put it on my car and pull you [01:26:21.000 --> 01:26:26.000] over, are you going to want to challenge my jurisdiction? [01:26:26.000 --> 01:26:28.000] Why, yes, sir. [01:26:28.000 --> 01:26:33.000] Or are you going to want me thrown in jail? [01:26:33.000 --> 01:26:36.000] This judge is impersonating a public official. [01:26:36.000 --> 01:26:39.000] If he doesn't have subject matter jurisdiction, then that's the point that [01:26:39.000 --> 01:26:40.000] should be brought to the judge. [01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:46.000] This thing about civil immunity, if you don't have subject matter [01:26:46.000 --> 01:26:50.000] jurisdiction, you don't have any immunity of any kind. [01:26:50.000 --> 01:26:52.000] All you have is theater. [01:26:52.000 --> 01:26:54.000] Exactly. [01:26:54.000 --> 01:26:58.000] And bad theater because it's going to come back to haunt you. [01:26:58.000 --> 01:27:03.000] The rest of the people in the courtroom, they think he got convicted. [01:27:03.000 --> 01:27:07.000] They think he got fined. [01:27:07.000 --> 01:27:09.000] But he's never paid the fine. [01:27:09.000 --> 01:27:11.000] We don't know if there's a warrant or not. [01:27:11.000 --> 01:27:13.000] They won't let us see the court file. [01:27:13.000 --> 01:27:16.000] Well, he ought to be filing criminal charges against the judge for acting [01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:18.000] without subject matter jurisdiction. [01:27:18.000 --> 01:27:19.000] Wait a minute. [01:27:19.000 --> 01:27:21.000] They won't let you see the court file. [01:27:21.000 --> 01:27:23.000] Who is they? [01:27:23.000 --> 01:27:27.000] The justice court clerk that I went to see this morning. [01:27:27.000 --> 01:27:31.000] I've had this before and I've done what you've done. [01:27:31.000 --> 01:27:35.000] That is a serious crime because court records are public. [01:27:35.000 --> 01:27:38.000] She asked me, was I an attorney? [01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:40.000] You don't have to be an attorney to look at a court record. [01:27:40.000 --> 01:27:42.000] They're public records. [01:27:42.000 --> 01:27:46.000] That's a big violation on her part. [01:27:46.000 --> 01:27:51.000] Well, what works well is now you open the door. [01:27:51.000 --> 01:27:54.000] Yeah, next time you go in there to try to get court records, [01:27:54.000 --> 01:27:58.000] bring yourself a recorder so that you can get it on video, [01:27:58.000 --> 01:28:02.000] like one of those little pens, you know, dig a pens or something. [01:28:02.000 --> 01:28:05.000] Or if you don't have one, a pocket MP3 recorder or something, [01:28:05.000 --> 01:28:10.000] you need to get it recorded, the court clerk denying you access to the record. [01:28:10.000 --> 01:28:13.000] Just tell them, I don't hear well. [01:28:13.000 --> 01:28:16.000] Will you look and speak clearly into my pen? [01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:19.000] Yeah, well, you may not want to do that because then it's real obvious. [01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:27.000] But, you know, just to have it with you is enough so that you can get the evidence. [01:28:27.000 --> 01:28:29.000] Let me address how to deal with this. [01:28:29.000 --> 01:28:32.000] They gave you a present. [01:28:32.000 --> 01:28:34.000] And let me preface this with, [01:28:34.000 --> 01:28:38.000] it's not about causing anybody to lose their job. [01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:42.000] It's not about getting anybody indicted. [01:28:42.000 --> 01:28:44.000] The law is not about that. [01:28:44.000 --> 01:28:46.000] It's not about punishment. [01:28:46.000 --> 01:28:48.000] It's about deterrence. [01:28:48.000 --> 01:28:53.000] And the likelihood of you getting the clerk or any of these officers indicted [01:28:53.000 --> 01:28:55.000] is somewhere between little and none. [01:28:55.000 --> 01:28:59.000] Right, well, it's about indictment for Eddie and me, that's for sure. [01:28:59.000 --> 01:29:00.000] Well, but it's about... [01:29:00.000 --> 01:29:02.000] Because that's what the deterrence is. [01:29:02.000 --> 01:29:06.000] Samples out of somebody so that it will deter the behavior of others. [01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:11.000] No one's ever going to get deterred if somebody doesn't go down at least once. [01:29:11.000 --> 01:29:12.000] Actually, they will. [01:29:12.000 --> 01:29:13.000] We'll see. [01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:15.000] It would be okay if they got indicted. [01:29:15.000 --> 01:29:16.000] We'll see. [01:29:16.000 --> 01:29:20.000] But when you go down to the prosecuting attorney [01:29:20.000 --> 01:29:24.000] and hand the prosecuting attorney a verified criminal affidavit [01:29:24.000 --> 01:29:29.000] accusing the officer who forced you to leave that building [01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:33.000] of obstruction of justice and shielding from prosecution [01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:37.000] and the prosecutor refuses to act, [01:29:37.000 --> 01:29:41.000] then you go to the grand jury with charges against the prosecutor. [01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:44.000] That's when it gets interesting. [01:29:44.000 --> 01:29:46.000] Okay, Paul, do you have anything else? [01:29:46.000 --> 01:29:48.000] No, that's good. [01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:50.000] I may call back tomorrow night. [01:29:50.000 --> 01:29:51.000] All right. [01:29:51.000 --> 01:29:52.000] All right, thanks. [01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:53.000] Thanks, Paul. [01:29:53.000 --> 01:29:54.000] Bye-bye. [01:29:54.000 --> 01:29:56.000] Okay, when we get back, we're going to go to Stephen, [01:29:56.000 --> 01:29:57.000] and then we've got Carlos. [01:29:57.000 --> 01:30:03.000] We'll be back on the other side of the break. [01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:06.000] Christ fed the multitudes with only one loaf of bread. [01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:09.000] Poor people, there's something for you. [01:30:09.000 --> 01:30:13.000] Austin's Own Caribbean, One Love Kitchen on the banks of the Colorado River. [01:30:13.000 --> 01:30:17.000] At 3109 East 1st Street is where you'll find One Love Kitchen. [01:30:17.000 --> 01:30:19.000] Jerk chicken, vegetarian restaurant. [01:30:19.000 --> 01:30:22.000] Monday through Wednesday, lunch and dinner, $5. [01:30:22.000 --> 01:30:25.000] Friday and Saturday, we got late night with Emperor Sound Crew. [01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:27.000] Still $5 place. [01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:33.000] Jerk chicken and vegetarian place to beat One Love Kitchen, Austin, Texas. [01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:35.000] Have you ever fed your family cornflakes [01:30:35.000 --> 01:30:37.000] or sent your kid off to school with a juice box? [01:30:37.000 --> 01:30:38.000] If so, look out. [01:30:38.000 --> 01:30:41.000] You might be sending them off to a lifetime of health problems. [01:30:41.000 --> 01:30:45.000] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll identify the culprit in just a moment. [01:30:45.000 --> 01:30:48.000] Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for [01:30:48.000 --> 01:30:52.000] and creating a massive database of your personal information. [01:30:52.000 --> 01:30:53.000] That's creepy. [01:30:53.000 --> 01:30:55.000] But it doesn't have to be that way. [01:30:55.000 --> 01:30:58.000] Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine. [01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:01.000] Startpage.com doesn't store your IP address, [01:31:01.000 --> 01:31:03.000] make a record of your searches or use tracking cookies, [01:31:03.000 --> 01:31:05.000] and they're third-party certified. [01:31:05.000 --> 01:31:09.000] If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage. [01:31:09.000 --> 01:31:12.000] Great search results and total privacy. [01:31:12.000 --> 01:31:15.000] Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:15.000 --> 01:31:18.000] Many breakfast cereals, juice drinks, and other products [01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:20.000] contain high fructose corn syrup. [01:31:20.000 --> 01:31:23.000] Well, it's no secret that too much sugar will expand your waistline. [01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:26.000] When that sweetener is in the form of high fructose corn syrup, [01:31:26.000 --> 01:31:28.000] you put your body at risk for disease. [01:31:28.000 --> 01:31:31.000] We're talking high blood pressure, obesity, especially in children, [01:31:31.000 --> 01:31:36.000] high cholesterol, and insulin resistance that can lead to type 2 diabetes. [01:31:36.000 --> 01:31:37.000] And that's just part of it. [01:31:37.000 --> 01:31:40.000] Food manufacturers have to list their ingredients on all packaging. [01:31:40.000 --> 01:31:43.000] Unfortunately, many are now providing alternatives. [01:31:43.000 --> 01:31:46.000] So the next time you reach for the cookies, ketchup, or barbecue sauce, [01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:47.000] check the label. [01:31:47.000 --> 01:31:50.000] The life you save may be your child's. [01:31:50.000 --> 01:31:52.000] This is Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:31:52.000 --> 01:31:55.000] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:31:55.000 --> 01:32:24.000] MUSIC [01:32:24.000 --> 01:32:25.000] Hi, folks. [01:32:25.000 --> 01:32:26.000] We are back. [01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:31.000] This is the rule of law, Randy Kelton, Eddie Craig, Debra Stevens. [01:32:31.000 --> 01:32:36.000] And before we go to the calls, I just want to put a plug in for all our sponsors [01:32:36.000 --> 01:32:39.000] and ask our listeners to please support our sponsors, [01:32:39.000 --> 01:32:44.000] because when you support our sponsors, you support this network and this radio show. [01:32:44.000 --> 01:32:52.000] We've had a decline, I would say, in donations and support of our sponsors. [01:32:52.000 --> 01:32:55.000] However, the listenership seems to be increasing. [01:32:55.000 --> 01:32:57.000] So there's not a problem with the show. [01:32:57.000 --> 01:33:01.000] There's not a problem with the content, because the show keeps growing. [01:33:01.000 --> 01:33:06.000] All the shows on this network are increasing in their numbers as far as listenership. [01:33:06.000 --> 01:33:11.000] So, folks, we really, really do need you to support our sponsors, [01:33:11.000 --> 01:33:14.000] because it's the only way that we're going to grow as a network. [01:33:14.000 --> 01:33:19.000] It's the only way that we're going to be able to expand and get on more AM and FM stations. [01:33:19.000 --> 01:33:21.000] It's the only way we're going to get syndicated. [01:33:21.000 --> 01:33:24.000] It's the only way we're going to get the message out to more people [01:33:24.000 --> 01:33:27.000] and actually try to make a business out of this, [01:33:27.000 --> 01:33:32.000] instead of it being basically just a hobby for Eddie and Randy and myself. [01:33:32.000 --> 01:33:35.000] I mean, we can only put so much time and effort into the network [01:33:35.000 --> 01:33:37.000] if we're not getting compensated for our time, [01:33:37.000 --> 01:33:40.000] because at some point we have to pay our own bills as well. [01:33:40.000 --> 01:33:45.000] So we really encourage folks out there to please support our sponsors. [01:33:45.000 --> 01:33:52.000] Main one is Capital Coin and Bullion at 5448 Burnett Road Suite No. 3. [01:33:52.000 --> 01:33:55.000] That's at the corner of Burnett and Shulmont. [01:33:55.000 --> 01:33:57.000] It's sort of in north central Austin. [01:33:57.000 --> 01:34:00.000] And folks out there who are listening online in other places, [01:34:00.000 --> 01:34:03.000] if you do not live in Austin, that's fine. [01:34:03.000 --> 01:34:05.000] You can still order. [01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:06.000] You can mail order. [01:34:06.000 --> 01:34:12.000] Give Chad a call, 512-646-6440 on normal business hours. [01:34:12.000 --> 01:34:17.000] You can also send an email, go to capitalcoinandbullion.com. [01:34:17.000 --> 01:34:22.000] That's just how it's spelled, with an A, C-A-P-I-T-A-L, [01:34:22.000 --> 01:34:28.000] capital coin and A and D, bullion, B-U-L-L-I-O-N.com, [01:34:28.000 --> 01:34:30.000] and place your order. [01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:32.000] You can buy or sell. [01:34:32.000 --> 01:34:36.000] He's got a wide variety of all kinds of gold and silver coins, numismatics, [01:34:36.000 --> 01:34:37.000] you name it. [01:34:37.000 --> 01:34:39.000] That's capitalcoinandbullion.com. [01:34:39.000 --> 01:34:43.000] Please stop by there and get yourselves some gold and silver [01:34:43.000 --> 01:34:45.000] before the prices skyrocket, [01:34:45.000 --> 01:34:48.000] before the manipulation ends by the banksters. [01:34:48.000 --> 01:34:50.000] There's also the Mike Mears method. [01:34:50.000 --> 01:34:53.000] Folks out there who may be having difficulty with debt collectors [01:34:53.000 --> 01:34:56.000] and creditors, please purchase the Mike Mears method. [01:34:56.000 --> 01:35:04.000] If you go to ruleoflawradio.com, scroll down right underneath the videos [01:35:04.000 --> 01:35:07.000] where you'll see the traffic seminar, also the traffic seminar, [01:35:07.000 --> 01:35:11.000] the baby blue banner, how to turn the tables on debt collectors. [01:35:11.000 --> 01:35:12.000] It's an animated GIF. [01:35:12.000 --> 01:35:16.000] Click on the baby blue Mike Mears proven method [01:35:16.000 --> 01:35:18.000] to get the Mike Mears method. [01:35:18.000 --> 01:35:20.000] He's won six cases in federal court. [01:35:20.000 --> 01:35:23.000] All of the callers who call in who have bought his method, [01:35:23.000 --> 01:35:27.000] bought his course have said that they have won their cases. [01:35:27.000 --> 01:35:29.000] He's got 100% track record. [01:35:29.000 --> 01:35:32.000] Also, jurisdictionary, right next to the Mike Mears banner. [01:35:32.000 --> 01:35:37.000] Win your lawsuit without a lawyer, jurisdictionary. [01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:41.000] This is a must for anyone who wants to engage [01:35:41.000 --> 01:35:43.000] in any kind of pro se actions at all, [01:35:43.000 --> 01:35:46.000] whether it be defending themselves criminally [01:35:46.000 --> 01:35:49.000] or filing a lawsuit or defending themselves against a lawsuit. [01:35:49.000 --> 01:35:52.000] Using the Mike Mears method, you've got to get jurisdictionary [01:35:52.000 --> 01:35:56.000] so you can learn the basics, the ABCs, so to speak. [01:35:56.000 --> 01:36:01.000] If you have a piano and you live in the Austin 90-mile radius area, [01:36:01.000 --> 01:36:04.000] Jerry Stevens Piano Service, my husband and folks, [01:36:04.000 --> 01:36:06.000] I was going to ask y'all to please click on the banner. [01:36:06.000 --> 01:36:10.000] Please click on the link because we need to get his new website [01:36:10.000 --> 01:36:14.000] into the search engines, HempUSA.org. [01:36:14.000 --> 01:36:15.000] They are a sponsor. [01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:17.000] Please support HempUSA.org. [01:36:17.000 --> 01:36:19.000] Get some products there. [01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:23.000] And, of course, our brand new sponsor, Shentrician, [01:36:23.000 --> 01:36:26.000] the big green banner right underneath of the list [01:36:26.000 --> 01:36:30.000] of all of our wonderful hosts on this network. [01:36:30.000 --> 01:36:33.000] Feel more energy and less stress. [01:36:33.000 --> 01:36:36.000] All of these purchases go to supportingruleoflawradio.com, [01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:39.000] supporting this network, supporting this radio show, [01:36:39.000 --> 01:36:42.000] so that we can take things to the next level. [01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:46.000] We very much need the listener support now more than ever. [01:36:46.000 --> 01:36:49.000] So, folks, please support all of our sponsors out there. [01:36:49.000 --> 01:36:53.000] Okay, we are now going to Stephen in Montana. [01:36:53.000 --> 01:36:55.000] And, of course, the traffic seminar. [01:36:55.000 --> 01:36:58.000] Do not forget Eddie's traffic seminar. [01:36:58.000 --> 01:37:02.000] There's the Buy Now button on ruleoflawradio.com [01:37:02.000 --> 01:37:06.000] right underneath the videos to get the traffic seminar. [01:37:06.000 --> 01:37:08.000] Proven results from that as well. [01:37:08.000 --> 01:37:10.000] Okay, we're going now to Stephen in Montana. [01:37:10.000 --> 01:37:12.000] Stephen, thanks for calling in. [01:37:12.000 --> 01:37:14.000] What's on your mind tonight? [01:37:14.000 --> 01:37:15.000] Hi, guys. [01:37:15.000 --> 01:37:17.000] I really don't know where to start. [01:37:17.000 --> 01:37:21.000] I got so much going on. [01:37:21.000 --> 01:37:25.000] I want to figure out some causes of action I might have. [01:37:25.000 --> 01:37:28.000] So first, before that, I have a real quick question [01:37:28.000 --> 01:37:34.000] on a motion to continuance that I filed a while back [01:37:34.000 --> 01:37:38.000] waiting on an order of writ of provision from the Supreme Court. [01:37:38.000 --> 01:37:46.000] In my motion for continuance, I said that I would waive my speedy trial rights [01:37:46.000 --> 01:37:51.000] until matters from the Supreme Court were heard. [01:37:51.000 --> 01:37:57.000] And then I said I would not waive them for one day more or one day less. [01:37:57.000 --> 01:38:07.000] And that's been about three months ago that I've heard back from the Supreme Court. [01:38:07.000 --> 01:38:10.000] But I forgot to put it in my word for clause. [01:38:10.000 --> 01:38:11.000] I mean, does that make a difference? [01:38:11.000 --> 01:38:18.000] If I waive a speedy trial right, do I make stipulations like that to it? [01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:22.000] Sure you can. [01:38:22.000 --> 01:38:32.000] In making the plea to the court, you don't have to waive your speedy trial right at all. [01:38:32.000 --> 01:38:35.000] But that's the delay you caused. [01:38:35.000 --> 01:38:43.000] You filed the motion for the writ, and that caused the delay. [01:38:43.000 --> 01:38:46.000] So that's attributed to you. [01:38:46.000 --> 01:38:51.000] Part of the time doesn't come out of the tolling of the limitations. [01:38:51.000 --> 01:38:56.000] So it wasn't necessary for you to waive anything or not waive anything. [01:38:56.000 --> 01:39:02.000] But as far as I know, you can put the stipulation anywhere you want to in it. [01:39:02.000 --> 01:39:03.000] Okay. [01:39:03.000 --> 01:39:05.000] Well, my motion was granted. [01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:12.000] The thing of it is the motion was granted, so I didn't go to trial. [01:39:12.000 --> 01:39:19.000] I put the motion in right before the time, like 10 days before trial, which was the last time I could. [01:39:19.000 --> 01:39:23.000] And because we were waiting on a writ of prohibition from the Supreme Court. [01:39:23.000 --> 01:39:31.000] And let's see here. [01:39:31.000 --> 01:39:35.000] And then so she granted the motion to continuance. [01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:38.000] And then we heard back from the Supreme Court like two months later. [01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:45.000] So that was that, and I only had like 15 days until my speedy trial was up. [01:39:45.000 --> 01:39:47.000] And so she granted my continuance. [01:39:47.000 --> 01:39:52.000] We heard back from the Supreme Court, and now it's been like three months. [01:39:52.000 --> 01:39:57.000] And I did get a public spreader, and he says, well, once I waived my rights, then I waive it forever. [01:39:57.000 --> 01:39:59.000] And I'm like, no, I didn't think that was right. [01:39:59.000 --> 01:40:02.000] But I didn't want him to make that sure. [01:40:02.000 --> 01:40:06.000] No, you had the stipulation in there. [01:40:06.000 --> 01:40:10.000] Absolutely, you don't waive it forever. [01:40:10.000 --> 01:40:14.000] Does it matter that I didn't put it in the wherefore clause? [01:40:14.000 --> 01:40:15.000] No. [01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:16.000] I don't know. [01:40:16.000 --> 01:40:17.000] Okay. [01:40:17.000 --> 01:40:21.000] That's a good question. [01:40:21.000 --> 01:40:29.000] I'm not an attorney, so I'm not that schooled in these minor specifics. [01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:32.000] So that is a good question. [01:40:32.000 --> 01:40:36.000] I would say it's not. [01:40:36.000 --> 01:40:43.000] It's all in the motion and continuance, and it's all, I just said, just specifically stated, [01:40:43.000 --> 01:40:48.000] I would waive my speedy trial rights, that accused will waive his speedy trial rights [01:40:48.000 --> 01:40:52.000] until the matters are heard from the Supreme Court to be attributable to the accused, [01:40:52.000 --> 01:40:57.000] not one day more or one day less than the fairness and the interest of justice. [01:40:57.000 --> 01:41:02.000] And that was in one of the paragraphs above, but I didn't put that in the wherefore clause. [01:41:02.000 --> 01:41:05.000] What did you put in the wherefore clause? [01:41:05.000 --> 01:41:08.000] Wherefore accused, respectfully petitioned, this court is granted continuance [01:41:08.000 --> 01:41:11.000] until matters are heard from the Supreme Court, attributable to the accused, [01:41:11.000 --> 01:41:17.000] and giving it time for accused to go over his defense with counsel. [01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:19.000] Okay. [01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:21.000] I wouldn't think so. [01:41:21.000 --> 01:41:26.000] I mean, the thing about motions is there's not some magic formula. [01:41:26.000 --> 01:41:37.000] A motion is really a letter to the judge, but generally you have to tell the judge what you want, [01:41:37.000 --> 01:41:45.000] give him the law that authorizes him to do what you want, and then ask him for what you want. [01:41:45.000 --> 01:41:53.000] So there's not some magic formula, and essentially a motion is kind of like a contract with the court. [01:41:53.000 --> 01:41:59.000] You ask the judge to do this thing under these circumstances, [01:41:59.000 --> 01:42:02.000] and if they accepted it, they accepted it under those circumstances. [01:42:02.000 --> 01:42:05.000] It's like a contract. [01:42:05.000 --> 01:42:06.000] Okay. [01:42:06.000 --> 01:42:11.000] Well, she granted it anyways, and this is also another funny thing she granted, [01:42:11.000 --> 01:42:23.000] because in there I put nine things that I was due process rights. [01:42:23.000 --> 01:42:27.000] I put that I should be able to have my continuous granted [01:42:27.000 --> 01:42:30.000] because I've been denied a judicial determination of this, [01:42:30.000 --> 01:42:35.000] denied a proof of jurisdiction on the record, denied a determination on the court, [01:42:35.000 --> 01:42:39.000] on the record of the notice and demand, denied the right to know the nature and cause, [01:42:39.000 --> 01:42:47.000] denied all discovery rights, denied the court recorder, denied the proof to show authority, [01:42:47.000 --> 01:42:52.000] and I put all these situations that I've been denied, and then she goes ahead and grants my petition. [01:42:52.000 --> 01:42:59.000] Does she think she is admitting to all that? [01:42:59.000 --> 01:43:03.000] She granted your petition. [01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:04.000] Yeah. [01:43:04.000 --> 01:43:05.000] A motion. [01:43:05.000 --> 01:43:07.000] Oh, no, she's not admitting to anything. [01:43:07.000 --> 01:43:12.000] She's just allowing you to raise the issue. [01:43:12.000 --> 01:43:14.000] Okay. [01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:15.000] Oh, wait a minute, wait a minute. [01:43:15.000 --> 01:43:17.000] Let me understand this. [01:43:17.000 --> 01:43:20.000] Was this heard in court? [01:43:20.000 --> 01:43:22.000] No, I haven't heard anything in court. [01:43:22.000 --> 01:43:27.000] Oh, so you just filed it, and the court allowed you to file it? [01:43:27.000 --> 01:43:31.000] The court allowed me to file it, and they granted it. [01:43:31.000 --> 01:43:33.000] They signed the order. [01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:38.000] They signed the order, and the defense didn't object, or the state didn't object. [01:43:38.000 --> 01:43:40.000] Oh, that's just for continuance. [01:43:40.000 --> 01:43:42.000] Oh, okay, yeah. [01:43:42.000 --> 01:43:44.000] Okay, listen, we're about to go to break. [01:43:44.000 --> 01:43:48.000] Let's finish up with Stephen on the other side. [01:43:48.000 --> 01:43:50.000] We've got a first-time caller, Grant from Texas. [01:43:50.000 --> 01:43:53.000] We've only got one segment left, so we need to move along here. [01:43:53.000 --> 01:43:55.000] We also have Carlos from California. [01:43:55.000 --> 01:44:00.000] We'll be right back. [01:44:00.000 --> 01:44:07.000] Thank you. [01:44:07.000 --> 01:44:14.000] Aerial spraying, chemtrails, the modified atmosphere, heavy metals and pesticides, [01:44:14.000 --> 01:44:19.000] carcinogens and chemical fibers all falling from the sky. [01:44:19.000 --> 01:44:22.000] You have a choice to keep your body clean. [01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:32.000] Detoxify with microplant powder from hempusa.org or call 908-691-2608. [01:44:32.000 --> 01:44:37.000] It's odorless and tasteless and used in any liquid or food. [01:44:37.000 --> 01:44:41.000] Protect your family now with microplant powder. [01:44:41.000 --> 01:44:47.000] Cleaning out heavy metals, parasites and toxins, order it now for daily intake [01:44:47.000 --> 01:44:50.000] and stock it now for long-term storage. [01:44:50.000 --> 01:45:02.000] Hempusa.org or call 908-691-2608 today. [01:45:02.000 --> 01:45:23.000] Hello. Oh, man, you're in jail. You got busted, man. Oh, man, I'm broke, man. [01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:47.000] Okay, folks, we're back. [01:45:47.000 --> 01:45:49.000] We're talking with Stephen in Montana. [01:45:49.000 --> 01:45:53.000] Okay, we need to move along quickly here because we have other callers. [01:45:53.000 --> 01:45:54.000] It's the last segment. [01:45:54.000 --> 01:45:57.000] Randy, you were talking something about a motion for continuance. [01:45:57.000 --> 01:46:00.000] Yeah, it was a motion for continuance. All she granted was the continuance. [01:46:00.000 --> 01:46:02.000] Well, that's a good thing. [01:46:02.000 --> 01:46:06.000] Essentially, it's not going to make any difference what you put in there. [01:46:06.000 --> 01:46:19.000] You're only counted unless you wrote a specific waiver, a waiver of speedy trial. [01:46:19.000 --> 01:46:24.000] It's not going to count anyway. She just granted you a continuance. [01:46:24.000 --> 01:46:26.000] Yeah, she granted me a continuance. [01:46:26.000 --> 01:46:30.000] So I don't think I have a motion that is missed for lack of speedy trial now [01:46:30.000 --> 01:46:31.000] since we've heard the report. [01:46:31.000 --> 01:46:32.000] Yeah, sure you do. [01:46:32.000 --> 01:46:41.000] If the decision from the higher courts came down, that's when the clock starts again. [01:46:41.000 --> 01:46:42.000] Okay. [01:46:42.000 --> 01:46:43.000] Make the claim. [01:46:43.000 --> 01:46:48.000] It's only like five days. [01:46:48.000 --> 01:46:51.000] Okay, we'll make the claim. [01:46:51.000 --> 01:46:56.000] Okay. I'll call back tomorrow. I've got a whole bunch of stuff to go over with you guys. [01:46:56.000 --> 01:46:58.000] Okay, yeah, call back tomorrow when we have more time. [01:46:58.000 --> 01:47:01.000] And please call back earlier in the show too. [01:47:01.000 --> 01:47:02.000] Okay. [01:47:02.000 --> 01:47:03.000] All right, thanks. [01:47:03.000 --> 01:47:04.000] Bye-bye. [01:47:04.000 --> 01:47:07.000] Okay, we're going now to Grant in Texas. [01:47:07.000 --> 01:47:08.000] Grant, thanks for calling in. [01:47:08.000 --> 01:47:10.000] First time caller, what's on your mind tonight? [01:47:10.000 --> 01:47:11.000] What's your question for us? [01:47:11.000 --> 01:47:12.000] Yeah, thank you. [01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:14.000] I have two pretty concise questions. [01:47:14.000 --> 01:47:22.000] The first is I had a JP hearing that I won, and the other party had appealed it. [01:47:22.000 --> 01:47:28.000] And I've just been notified yesterday with the JP court, but I've never been served anything. [01:47:28.000 --> 01:47:32.000] Shouldn't I be served if they're bringing this to appeal? [01:47:32.000 --> 01:47:34.000] What were you notified? [01:47:34.000 --> 01:47:42.000] Well, the JP court told me that they appealed, I think on the 4th or the 5th, they appealed the ruling. [01:47:42.000 --> 01:47:46.000] I got the judgment in my favor, but the other party has appealed it. [01:47:46.000 --> 01:47:49.000] Okay, well, they've probably got time. [01:47:49.000 --> 01:47:52.000] They put in a notice of appeal to the court. [01:47:52.000 --> 01:47:58.000] They've got to do that within 10 days, but they haven't appealed it yet. [01:47:58.000 --> 01:48:02.000] Okay, I'll get served, like formally served. [01:48:02.000 --> 01:48:05.000] Yeah, when they file the appeal, they'll file a copy of it with you. [01:48:05.000 --> 01:48:06.000] They'll serve you. [01:48:06.000 --> 01:48:12.000] Okay, I just want to make sure they won't do anything behind my back and get some kind of default judgment. [01:48:12.000 --> 01:48:17.000] Here's a quick question I had was I have a suit that I had filed, and I got the response back, [01:48:17.000 --> 01:48:24.000] and they did a motion to dismiss it as prejudice, and they also did a motion for a more definite statement. [01:48:24.000 --> 01:48:29.000] I was just wondering, is the next step to wait for the judge to make a ruling on that? [01:48:29.000 --> 01:48:33.000] Yeah, the judge would have to rule on it. [01:48:33.000 --> 01:48:44.000] You know you really need to respond to it, and generally this is a federal, Rule 12 is kind of a knee jerk, [01:48:44.000 --> 01:48:49.000] especially after the heightened pleading standards. [01:48:49.000 --> 01:48:54.000] Now it seems like no matter what you file, they just knee jerk. [01:48:54.000 --> 01:49:01.000] File the Rule 12 and ask the judge to, maybe because it's kind of new, [01:49:01.000 --> 01:49:06.000] it's only been a year or so since the judge has raised the bar somewhat. [01:49:06.000 --> 01:49:16.000] So they're regularly asking the judge to look at the specificity of the allegation, [01:49:16.000 --> 01:49:25.000] so they do a kind of knee jerk, but it's in the case law that it's bad form to dismiss on a Rule 12 [01:49:25.000 --> 01:49:30.000] unless there's just nothing in the suit. [01:49:30.000 --> 01:49:37.000] Right, I was just wondering if I should even now be a little bit more specific with my allegations? [01:49:37.000 --> 01:49:42.000] Yes, generally in the response to it, then you get more specific. [01:49:42.000 --> 01:49:46.000] Okay, if I don't need to wait for the judge, I can move forward. [01:49:46.000 --> 01:49:51.000] Yeah, you need to give an answer, and well actually it kind of depends on you. [01:49:51.000 --> 01:49:55.000] You can do your specific answer in the Rule 12. [01:49:55.000 --> 01:49:56.000] Okay. [01:49:56.000 --> 01:50:02.000] Like you can ask the judge to treat this as a request for a more definite statement [01:50:02.000 --> 01:50:06.000] and offer this as the more definite statement. [01:50:06.000 --> 01:50:07.000] Okay, excellent. [01:50:07.000 --> 01:50:10.000] Okay, well thank you all for the information. [01:50:10.000 --> 01:50:11.000] I appreciate it. [01:50:11.000 --> 01:50:13.000] All right, thanks, Grant. [01:50:13.000 --> 01:50:17.000] Okay, we're going now to Carlos in California. [01:50:17.000 --> 01:50:18.000] Carlos, thanks for calling in. [01:50:18.000 --> 01:50:20.000] What's on your mind tonight? [01:50:20.000 --> 01:50:21.000] Good evening. [01:50:21.000 --> 01:50:25.000] I've got a couple quick things and one good thing to mention. [01:50:25.000 --> 01:50:31.000] But first of all, Randy, I know someone that's been trying to file a criminal complaint. [01:50:31.000 --> 01:50:35.000] He found the notary didn't do her job properly. [01:50:35.000 --> 01:50:40.000] She did something unlawful, and this person went to the police. [01:50:40.000 --> 01:50:41.000] They said, no, you have to go. [01:50:41.000 --> 01:50:43.000] They have her running around. [01:50:43.000 --> 01:50:46.000] What is the best and easiest way to file a criminal complaint? [01:50:46.000 --> 01:50:48.000] Okay, piece of cake. [01:50:48.000 --> 01:50:49.000] That's why I came here. [01:50:49.000 --> 01:50:59.000] You make up a criminal affidavit and just go down to the court and look in the criminal case files [01:50:59.000 --> 01:51:02.000] and look at a criminal complaint in there. [01:51:02.000 --> 01:51:10.000] They all use the same form, and they vary somewhat with jurisdictions. [01:51:10.000 --> 01:51:16.000] And get a copy of any criminal complaint and use that form. [01:51:16.000 --> 01:51:20.000] In the states, they don't require this, but in the Fed, they do. [01:51:20.000 --> 01:51:27.000] They require that you write the complaint in the language of the statute. [01:51:27.000 --> 01:51:33.000] And that's a good form in the state or in the federal. [01:51:33.000 --> 01:51:43.000] Like the primary one I like to do is, in Texas, it's 39.03, official oppression. [01:51:43.000 --> 01:51:48.000] The public official fails to perform a duty he's required to perform [01:51:48.000 --> 01:51:54.000] or exerts or purports to exert an authority he does not expressly have, [01:51:54.000 --> 01:51:57.000] and in the process denies the citizen full free access to a dorm. [01:51:57.000 --> 01:51:58.000] Right. [01:51:58.000 --> 01:52:07.000] They say the individual failed to perform a duty he's required to perform specifically, [01:52:07.000 --> 01:52:12.000] and then you state the duty and the details of how he failed to perform the duty. [01:52:12.000 --> 01:52:18.000] Or exerted or purported to exert an authority he did not specifically have, [01:52:18.000 --> 01:52:26.000] and then you explain what he did that was an expression of authority he didn't have. [01:52:26.000 --> 01:52:32.000] And then therefore, you start out with I have reason to believe and do believe [01:52:32.000 --> 01:52:36.000] based on the following, that he violated this law. [01:52:36.000 --> 01:52:42.000] You state the language of the law, and by doing this, and therefore, [01:52:42.000 --> 01:52:45.000] you're accusing him of committing this crime. [01:52:45.000 --> 01:52:50.000] Just look at how they write it up and write it up similar. [01:52:50.000 --> 01:52:54.000] Take it to a notary, sign it in front of a notary, [01:52:54.000 --> 01:53:02.000] and unless you can put the affidavit of fact in the complaint itself, [01:53:02.000 --> 01:53:07.000] or you can make the complaint just bare bones [01:53:07.000 --> 01:53:12.000] and then put a statement of facts as an affidavit with it, have that verified. [01:53:12.000 --> 01:53:17.000] That is a complaint as opposed to complaining. [01:53:17.000 --> 01:53:21.000] If you go to the police department and tell them these guys did dirty rotten stuff, [01:53:21.000 --> 01:53:23.000] that's complaining. [01:53:23.000 --> 01:53:28.000] And then the police department has a duty to prevent crime, [01:53:28.000 --> 01:53:33.000] so they will generally either look at it or if it's against a public official, [01:53:33.000 --> 01:53:34.000] they're just going to blow it off. [01:53:34.000 --> 01:53:36.000] They're not going to do anything. [01:53:36.000 --> 01:53:38.000] They're not required to. [01:53:38.000 --> 01:53:41.000] They have a certain amount of discretion. [01:53:41.000 --> 01:53:42.000] However... [01:53:42.000 --> 01:53:44.000] Should you report it to the police or no? [01:53:44.000 --> 01:53:46.000] I generally don't bother. [01:53:46.000 --> 01:53:48.000] If it's a public official... [01:53:48.000 --> 01:53:49.000] No, it's not a public official. [01:53:49.000 --> 01:53:51.000] It's just a notary. [01:53:51.000 --> 01:53:52.000] It's a notary. [01:53:52.000 --> 01:53:53.000] Then you can. [01:53:53.000 --> 01:53:54.000] They might. [01:53:54.000 --> 01:53:55.000] Wait a minute. [01:53:55.000 --> 01:53:56.000] A public official, a notary is a public official. [01:53:56.000 --> 01:53:59.000] A notary is an officer of the court. [01:53:59.000 --> 01:54:05.000] Yeah, but a notary is not close enough to the court that they tend to protect them. [01:54:05.000 --> 01:54:07.000] Well, there's still the point is there's still a public servant. [01:54:07.000 --> 01:54:08.000] I understand that, [01:54:08.000 --> 01:54:12.000] but the notaries are generally just ordinary people out here that are running the business [01:54:12.000 --> 01:54:15.000] and they happen to have a notary business. [01:54:15.000 --> 01:54:18.000] They're not considered a part of the court. [01:54:18.000 --> 01:54:22.000] They're not the people that these guys deal with every day, [01:54:22.000 --> 01:54:25.000] so they don't consider them a part of their little club. [01:54:25.000 --> 01:54:27.000] So they might actually go after them, [01:54:27.000 --> 01:54:31.000] but you really need to give them a written verified affidavit. [01:54:31.000 --> 01:54:36.000] Generally, they'll give you this form to fill out that's a voluntary statement. [01:54:36.000 --> 01:54:37.000] Right, right. [01:54:37.000 --> 01:54:42.000] If you want to... [01:54:42.000 --> 01:54:45.000] What is the point of going after the notary? [01:54:45.000 --> 01:54:48.000] How does it lead toward your outcome? [01:54:48.000 --> 01:54:58.000] Well, this notary did an unlawful...that notary did not have the president in front of this person. [01:54:58.000 --> 01:55:00.000] Now this person left their house. [01:55:00.000 --> 01:55:01.000] I mean, it's a big thing. [01:55:01.000 --> 01:55:02.000] That's a big thing. [01:55:02.000 --> 01:55:04.000] It's a huge thing for me. [01:55:04.000 --> 01:55:06.000] Yeah, that's a really huge thing. [01:55:06.000 --> 01:55:10.000] We're finding it in all cases in California. [01:55:10.000 --> 01:55:12.000] So it's a pattern? [01:55:12.000 --> 01:55:14.000] Yes, it's a pattern. [01:55:14.000 --> 01:55:18.000] Let me tell you a story about when I was a notary. [01:55:18.000 --> 01:55:23.000] I had a friend that went into the bail bond business. [01:55:23.000 --> 01:55:26.000] I helped him get in the bail bond business years ago, [01:55:26.000 --> 01:55:31.000] and he needed a notary to notarize his bail bond forms. [01:55:31.000 --> 01:55:35.000] So he set me up as a notary, and he called me another one day, [01:55:35.000 --> 01:55:39.000] and he wanted me to notarize a whole bunch of these blank documents. [01:55:39.000 --> 01:55:41.000] I said, wait a minute. [01:55:41.000 --> 01:55:44.000] I got to notarize it when the person's here. [01:55:44.000 --> 01:55:46.000] I said, well, this way everybody in the whole county does it. [01:55:46.000 --> 01:55:49.000] All of them do it this way. [01:55:49.000 --> 01:55:51.000] I said, okay. [01:55:51.000 --> 01:55:56.000] And then I wound up getting arrested when the sheriff's deputy tried to kill me [01:55:56.000 --> 01:56:02.000] and didn't get it done and then charged me to cover up what he did. [01:56:02.000 --> 01:56:05.000] And my friend came down and bailed me out. [01:56:05.000 --> 01:56:11.000] And when I read the bail form, I was the notary on it. [01:56:11.000 --> 01:56:15.000] I said, Jim, you sure this is okay? [01:56:15.000 --> 01:56:19.000] Well, maybe this could cause a problem. [01:56:19.000 --> 01:56:22.000] So it is common practice. [01:56:22.000 --> 01:56:23.000] Right, right. [01:56:23.000 --> 01:56:26.000] And it may just be common practice there where the notary just comes in, [01:56:26.000 --> 01:56:28.000] stamps a whole bunch of them. [01:56:28.000 --> 01:56:29.000] Right. [01:56:29.000 --> 01:56:34.000] But it's certainly a way to hammer them because it gives them opportunity to... [01:56:34.000 --> 01:56:38.000] Okay, one quick really important point for everybody, [01:56:38.000 --> 01:56:41.000] and that might knock their socks out, Randy. [01:56:41.000 --> 01:56:45.000] I went to a seminar in Arizona last weekend, [01:56:45.000 --> 01:56:51.000] and we had a banker, ex-banker, 30 years' experience in banking. [01:56:51.000 --> 01:56:53.000] I don't know if I've heard of him. [01:56:53.000 --> 01:56:54.000] Okay. [01:56:54.000 --> 01:56:55.000] No, this is what he said. [01:56:55.000 --> 01:56:56.000] You probably already heard it. [01:56:56.000 --> 01:56:59.000] He says that whenever someone's in bankruptcy, [01:56:59.000 --> 01:57:04.000] as soon as they file a bankruptcy, there is in the Pulling Services Agreement [01:57:04.000 --> 01:57:09.000] an insurance that triggers and pays off the debt. [01:57:09.000 --> 01:57:10.000] I'm just telling you to be creative. [01:57:10.000 --> 01:57:12.000] Oh, that is interesting. [01:57:12.000 --> 01:57:13.000] It is real interesting. [01:57:13.000 --> 01:57:15.000] But I'm not going to tell you to do it. [01:57:15.000 --> 01:57:17.000] I'm just going to tell you to be creative. [01:57:17.000 --> 01:57:18.000] Okay. [01:57:18.000 --> 01:57:21.000] The thing about the insurance, it's interesting, [01:57:21.000 --> 01:57:28.000] but I had someone raise that issue today that they got paid off by the mortgage insurance. [01:57:28.000 --> 01:57:29.000] Yes. [01:57:29.000 --> 01:57:30.000] And I told them well? [01:57:30.000 --> 01:57:32.000] The insurance is that you don't pay, okay? [01:57:32.000 --> 01:57:35.000] It's an insurance that they get on their own, [01:57:35.000 --> 01:57:37.000] and it triggers when you file bankruptcy. [01:57:37.000 --> 01:57:38.000] Okay. [01:57:38.000 --> 01:57:40.000] Here's why it doesn't help you. [01:57:40.000 --> 01:57:41.000] Okay. [01:57:41.000 --> 01:57:43.000] Because they're gambling. [01:57:43.000 --> 01:57:53.000] They placed this bet that they made a bet with the insurance company. [01:57:53.000 --> 01:57:58.000] They bet the property would be involved in bankruptcy, [01:57:58.000 --> 01:58:01.000] and the insurance company bet it wouldn't. [01:58:01.000 --> 01:58:03.000] The insurance company lost the bet. [01:58:03.000 --> 01:58:04.000] Okay. [01:58:04.000 --> 01:58:08.000] So it doesn't help you in alleviating your liability. [01:58:08.000 --> 01:58:10.000] It's not really a payoff of the mortgage. [01:58:10.000 --> 01:58:11.000] It's just an insurance claim. [01:58:11.000 --> 01:58:13.000] Yeah. [01:58:13.000 --> 01:58:14.000] All right, guys. [01:58:14.000 --> 01:58:15.000] I'll stand back now. [01:58:15.000 --> 01:58:16.000] Thank you. [01:58:16.000 --> 01:58:17.000] Okay. [01:58:17.000 --> 01:58:18.000] Thanks, Carlos. [01:58:18.000 --> 01:58:19.000] Okay, folks. [01:58:19.000 --> 01:58:20.000] We're out of time for this show. [01:58:20.000 --> 01:58:24.000] We'll be back tomorrow night for our four-hour info marathon, [01:58:24.000 --> 01:58:26.000] so line up your questions and call in early [01:58:26.000 --> 01:58:29.000] so that everybody doesn't stack up at the end. [01:58:29.000 --> 01:58:33.000] 512-646-1984 is the call-in number. [01:58:33.000 --> 01:58:37.000] 512-485-9010 is to listen only, [01:58:37.000 --> 01:58:40.000] but please listen online, ruleoflawradio.com, [01:58:40.000 --> 01:58:43.000] so we can get our stream numbers up, and please support our sponsors. [01:58:43.000 --> 01:58:46.000] Click on all the banner ads, even if you can't buy anything right now, [01:58:46.000 --> 01:58:50.000] just to increase the web traffic to their websites. [01:58:50.000 --> 01:58:52.000] Every little bit helps, folks. [01:58:52.000 --> 01:58:54.000] We'll be back tomorrow night. [01:58:54.000 --> 01:59:17.000] Thank you. [01:59:24.000 --> 01:59:51.000] We'll be back tomorrow night. [01:59:51.000 --> 02:00:05.000] Good night.