[00:00.000 --> 00:04.320] This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet. [00:04.320 --> 00:08.000] Former Cuban President Fidel Castro has said for the first time [00:08.000 --> 00:11.520] the Cuban Revolution persecuted gays in its early years. [00:11.520 --> 00:16.480] In the 1960s and 70s thousands of homosexuals were sent to forced labor camps [00:16.480 --> 00:20.920] without trial. In 1979 homosexuality was decriminalized [00:20.920 --> 00:24.800] and more recently there have been efforts to legalize same-sex unions. [00:24.800 --> 00:28.800] Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair [00:28.800 --> 00:32.600] praises George Bush in his new memoir. Blair wrote [00:32.600 --> 00:36.760] I was asked which of the political leaders I had met had most integrity. [00:36.760 --> 00:40.600] I listed George near the top in what was a fairly liberal audience. [00:40.600 --> 00:44.360] Some people were aghast, others tittered thinking I was joking. [00:44.360 --> 00:48.960] But I meant it. He had genuine integrity and as much political courage as any [00:48.960 --> 00:50.200] leader I ever met. [00:50.200 --> 00:53.600] In Maputo Mozambique [00:53.600 --> 00:58.080] clashes have broken out between police and protesters riled by rising food [00:58.080 --> 00:58.720] prices. [00:58.720 --> 01:01.920] Police shot six protesters including one boy. [01:01.920 --> 01:06.640] The price of bread has risen 30 percent this year following droughts in Eastern Europe. [01:06.640 --> 01:12.040] While most Americans have struggled to make ends meet during the recession [01:12.040 --> 01:14.760] some members of Congress have actually grown richer. [01:14.760 --> 01:18.640] According to the congressional newspaper The Hill, the collective net worth of the [01:18.640 --> 01:20.720] 50 richest members of the Congress [01:20.720 --> 01:24.480] was at least 1.4 billion dollars in 2009 [01:24.480 --> 01:28.560] up more than 85 million from the year before. Made up of 30 house [01:28.560 --> 01:30.120] members and 20 senators [01:30.120 --> 01:34.600] the list comprises 27 Democrats including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi [01:34.600 --> 01:38.600] and 23 Republicans. Topping the list is Senator John Kerry [01:38.600 --> 01:41.680] who's declared net worth was 189 million [01:41.680 --> 01:45.960] an increase of 20 million over 2008. Kerry came under fire [01:45.960 --> 01:49.240] for avoiding taxes on his seven million dollar yacht. [01:49.240 --> 01:52.640] The environmental group Greenpeace [01:52.640 --> 01:57.000] claims to have halted offshore drilling by a British oil company in the Arctic [01:57.000 --> 02:00.040] after four climbers occupied the rig Tuesday. [02:00.040 --> 02:03.960] Greenpeace said the four protesters invaded a small flotilla [02:03.960 --> 02:08.160] of armed Danish Navy and police boats in Baffin Bay off Greenland [02:08.160 --> 02:11.600] guarding the rig since the Greenpeace ship Esperanza [02:11.600 --> 02:16.240] arrived last week. The rigs are operated by the oil exploration company Can Energy [02:16.240 --> 02:20.120] which prompted worldwide alarm amongst environmentalists [02:20.120 --> 02:24.120] after disclosing it had found the first evidence of oil or gas deposits [02:24.120 --> 02:27.920] under the Arctic. Several oil giants including Exxon [02:27.920 --> 02:31.400] Chevron and Shell are waiting for permission from Greenland [02:31.400 --> 02:35.280] to begin deep sea drilling in the Arctic's pristine waters. [02:35.280 --> 02:38.600] Campaigners claim this has led to a dangerous rush [02:38.600 --> 02:42.080] to exploit one of the world's last major untapped reserves [02:42.080 --> 02:46.240] in one of its most fragile locations. The US Geological Survey [02:46.240 --> 02:49.280] estimates there may be 90 billion barrels of oil [02:49.280 --> 02:56.280] and 50 trillion cubic meters of gas across the Arctic. [03:20.280 --> 03:24.280] Bad Boys! [03:24.280 --> 03:29.280] What you want? What you want? What you gonna do? [03:29.280 --> 03:32.280] We're gonna show you something broken for you. [03:32.280 --> 03:36.280] Tell me! [03:36.280 --> 03:41.280] What you wanna do? What you gonna do? [03:41.280 --> 03:42.280] Yeah! [03:42.280 --> 03:44.280] Bad Boys! Bad Boys! [03:44.280 --> 03:47.280] What you gonna do? What you gonna do? [03:47.280 --> 03:50.280] When they come for you? [03:50.280 --> 03:54.280] What you gonna do? What you gonna do when they come for you? [03:54.280 --> 03:57.280] When you were 8 years old and had bad trees [03:57.280 --> 03:59.280] you go to school and learn the golden rule [03:59.280 --> 04:02.280] So why are you acting like a bloody fool? [04:02.280 --> 04:05.280] If you get cocked and you must get crewed [04:05.280 --> 04:06.280] Bad Boys! Bad Boys! [04:06.280 --> 04:09.280] What you gonna do? What you gonna do? [04:09.280 --> 04:12.280] When they come for you? [04:12.280 --> 04:14.280] What you gonna do? What you gonna do? [04:14.280 --> 04:27.280] Hi, folks. Good evening. This is Eddie Craig, Rule of Law Radio. Debra Stevens, Randy Kelton. [04:27.280 --> 04:32.880] We are trying to get Randy connected with us here, so he should be on shortly. Tonight, [04:32.880 --> 04:37.760] there is some details I would like to go over on the issue that I began discussing with [04:37.760 --> 04:46.200] Randy on last Thursday regarding the use of criminal complaints to prosecute certain cases [04:46.200 --> 04:54.160] here in Texas, specifically the ones that are fine-only or malaprohibita offenses. Okay? [04:54.160 --> 04:59.200] So I've written my arguments down and I've fleshed out the details on them. And what [04:59.200 --> 05:05.720] I'd like to do first is lay this out for you folks and get you to thinking about it. And [05:05.720 --> 05:09.200] if you have any questions or comments on it, we'd love to hear from you when we start taking [05:09.200 --> 05:14.480] calls. We'll also be ready to take calls for your other issues. So anything you got when [05:14.480 --> 05:23.040] we open up the phone lines, please feel free. The call-in number is 512-646-1984. Okay. [05:23.040 --> 05:27.640] Now this is the way that I've set this up here. I've got my arguments basically numbered [05:27.640 --> 05:39.560] one to 12. Number one is, Pursuant Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 1.23, 21.02802 [05:39.560 --> 05:51.560] Sub-Item 8 and 45.019 Sub-Section A Sub-Item 7 and 30.00049, all criminal complaints and [05:51.560 --> 05:57.360] grand jury indictments in Texas must conclude with the statement against the peace and [05:57.360 --> 06:04.280] dignity of the state. Number two, according to Black's Law Dictionary, 6th edition on [06:04.280 --> 06:12.200] page 62, against the peace is defined as a technical phrase used in alleging a breach [06:12.200 --> 06:19.680] of the peace. Okay. Number three, there is also the consideration of both Bouvier's Law [06:19.680 --> 06:26.320] Dictionary from 1856 and the above cited Black's Law upon the same page that against the form [06:26.320 --> 06:32.320] of the statute is defined as technical words which must be used in framing an indictment [06:32.320 --> 06:39.480] for a breach of the statute prohibiting the act complained of. Now understand that. There [06:39.480 --> 06:47.880] is breach of the peace and there is against the form of the statute or breach of the statute [06:47.880 --> 06:54.880] would be the simpler way of saying it. Okay. They're not one and the same thing. Malaprohibita [06:54.880 --> 07:04.000] is a breach of a statute that's just unlawful because of statute itself prohibiting it, [07:04.000 --> 07:10.400] not that the act itself would otherwise be criminal because it causes no harm to anyone. [07:10.400 --> 07:16.160] So according to this, this lends us to the next argument. These definitions in number [07:16.160 --> 07:21.000] four that we spoke of in two and three, I'm dealing with in number four, these definitions [07:21.000 --> 07:26.960] appear to draw a legal distinction between a malaprohibita offense and an actual felony [07:26.960 --> 07:35.720] or breach of the peace type offense. Okay. Number five, these distinctions then lend themselves [07:35.720 --> 07:42.440] to the creation of the inference that the act complained of in the actual criminal complaint [07:42.440 --> 07:49.760] consists of all the necessary elements consistent with either a felony or an actual breach of [07:49.760 --> 07:58.040] the peace. And it does that because it says against the peace as the closing to the body [07:58.040 --> 08:07.040] of the complaint. It says it also on the indictment. Number six, in summarizing the various court [08:07.040 --> 08:12.560] cases I've researched, the courts have consistently ruled that a breach of the peace occurs only [08:12.560 --> 08:19.920] when there is an overt act of violence or use of inflammatory language that is either [08:19.920 --> 08:27.680] in progress or is imminent and that is intended to cause harm to another or to property or [08:27.680 --> 08:36.840] is intended to incite others to do same. Okay. Therefore, not all misdemeanors constitute [08:36.840 --> 08:43.120] a breach of the peace because not all of them contain the element of an overt act of violence [08:43.120 --> 08:49.960] or incendiary language for the purpose of committing violence or inciting violence. [08:49.960 --> 08:57.960] So they're not breaches of the peace. Number seven, not a single traffic or other malaprohibita [08:57.960 --> 09:04.160] offense punishable by fine only that I can find anywhere in Texas law has the necessary [09:04.160 --> 09:10.000] element of an overt act of violence or incendiary language to constitute the breach of the peace [09:10.000 --> 09:17.200] like I just said. Number eight, this then creates the additional argument that the one [09:17.200 --> 09:23.120] swearing to the veracity of the contents and signing the complaint has just committed an [09:23.120 --> 09:31.640] act of perjury or aggravated perjury. Number nine, this argument exists because the complaint [09:31.640 --> 09:36.920] is sworn and signed with the intent that the one accused within the complaint of having [09:36.920 --> 09:42.240] perpetrated the act is to be made to answer and to suffer punishment according to the [09:42.240 --> 09:49.460] allegations made in the complaint. Now, I'll go back and cover that part here in a minute. [09:49.460 --> 09:56.600] Number 10, the complaint by using the mandatory phrase against the peace is alleging that [09:56.600 --> 10:02.440] the act complained of did in fact constitute a breach of the peace rather than a breach [10:02.440 --> 10:09.320] of the form of the statute. The complaint alleges that a breach of the peace has occurred [10:09.320 --> 10:17.160] despite there being no overt act of violence or incendiary language either having or intended [10:17.160 --> 10:25.080] to incite an act of violence or destruction of property. Okay? Because the necessary element, [10:25.080 --> 10:31.640] number 11, of the overt act is nonexistent, the complaint is false upon its face by alleging [10:31.640 --> 10:36.800] that there was such an act involved and that the accused perpetrated the act in question [10:36.800 --> 10:44.080] with such intent. And number 12, therefore the complaint being signed under penalty of [10:44.080 --> 10:52.440] perjury and containing a knowingly false misrepresentation and inference by the accuser is proof positive [10:52.440 --> 10:58.840] of fraud being perpetrated upon the court, false allegations being made against the accused [10:58.840 --> 11:04.920] and criminal collusion between the accuser, the prosecution and the judge to cause harm [11:04.920 --> 11:11.480] to the accused through keeping this complaint active when it is invalid upon its face by [11:11.480 --> 11:19.240] its very statement. Now, back up at the top there where I was talking about going over [11:19.240 --> 11:24.880] number 10 where the phrase against the peace is alleging the act complained of did in fact [11:24.880 --> 11:32.560] constitute a breach of the peace, you can't sue them for filing the criminal complaint. [11:32.560 --> 11:41.420] So you don't have a cause of action because they filed a false complaint. Okay? Other than [11:41.420 --> 11:49.640] once the complaint is withdrawn, now you have a cause of action for malicious prosecution. [11:49.640 --> 11:57.760] Okay? But as Randy made note, you cannot sue somebody just because they filed a criminal [11:57.760 --> 12:04.120] complaint regardless of the intentions and motive for which they filed it. But once you [12:04.120 --> 12:10.580] make the argument that the complaint is false upon its face where it must be withdrawn, [12:10.580 --> 12:15.320] now that the complaint is withdrawn, it was decided in your favor that the complaint was [12:15.320 --> 12:21.160] invalid. The case was dismissed because of an invalid complaint. You now have standing [12:21.160 --> 12:31.080] and grounds for a cause of action under malicious prosecution. So out of all the people that [12:31.080 --> 12:35.720] I'm associated with that do legal research and everything, I sent them a copy of this [12:35.720 --> 12:42.960] and I've asked them to go through it, pick it apart, provide case law for or against, [12:42.960 --> 12:48.480] send me their comments. I want to know what people think of this argument because on its [12:48.480 --> 12:54.460] face the courts and the prosecutors are trying to have their cake and eat it too. They're [12:54.460 --> 13:01.820] making false claims of a breach of the peace in the criminal complaint, yet the act being [13:01.820 --> 13:10.600] complained of in no way constitutes such a breach. Now if this thing is to be signed [13:10.600 --> 13:18.840] and sworn under penalty of perjury that its entire contents is true and correct and it's [13:18.840 --> 13:26.040] not, something's wrong. And if the courts are saying that doesn't matter, something's [13:26.040 --> 13:35.320] wrong because you can't have it both ways. Either the complaint is valid or it is not [13:35.320 --> 13:42.560] valid. There is no halfway mark. And if it contains a false statement of fact, then it [13:42.560 --> 13:50.360] is invalid. The only thing that I can see the court doing, which I don't believe they [13:50.360 --> 13:58.840] will even try to do, is to overturn 230 plus years of case law stating what a breach of [13:58.840 --> 14:08.280] the peace actually is. And that the overt act against persons or property for the act [14:08.280 --> 14:17.640] of violence or inciting violence or other type of physical harm is the only thing that [14:17.640 --> 14:21.360] constitutes a breach of the peace. And the court now wants to argue, well, that doesn't [14:21.360 --> 14:31.360] matter. I don't see how they're going to get away with that. But that's the argument [14:31.360 --> 14:35.680] that I've developed based upon the information contained in these criminal complaints and [14:35.680 --> 14:40.920] based upon the information in the law dictionaries. Now you'll notice, like I said, there is a [14:40.920 --> 14:47.280] distinction being drawn in the law dictionary between an offense against a statute that's [14:47.280 --> 14:56.440] just malaprohibita and an actual breach of the peace. They are not one and the same thing. [14:56.440 --> 15:04.160] If that's the case, that would mean that malaprohibita and fine-only offenses that do not involve [15:04.160 --> 15:10.520] the incendiary language or the overt act, constituting a violent act against persons [15:10.520 --> 15:20.360] or property, doesn't qualify as a breach of the peace, it cannot be criminal. It therefore [15:20.360 --> 15:31.960] can only be a civil problem that goes against the form of the statute. Because all criminal [15:31.960 --> 15:39.160] complaints and criminal indictments by law must state it's a breach of the peace or [15:39.160 --> 15:50.200] a felony by saying against the peace in the complaint. That's my theory, folks. And until [15:50.200 --> 15:57.200] proven wrong, which I'm, if it's possible, someone will do, I'm sticking to it. Debra, [15:57.200 --> 16:02.800] you got any commentary on that? Well, it sounds pretty valid to me. I think we have Randy [16:02.800 --> 16:09.440] up on the line. Randy, so what do you have to say about it? Well, I've talked about this [16:09.440 --> 16:19.400] before with Eddie. On its face, it looks like a very strong argument. But when it comes [16:19.400 --> 16:28.200] to actually getting this adjudicated, I think this is going to be a fight. We are asking [16:28.200 --> 16:38.480] the courts again to throw out, if not 200 years, a pretty large number of years of adjudication [16:38.480 --> 16:45.660] where complaints are filed without regard to that term against peace. Okay, we'll be [16:45.660 --> 16:50.560] right back on the other side. This is Randy Calvin, Eddie Craig, Debra Stevens, rule of [16:50.560 --> 17:06.800] law. We'll be right back. Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, [17:06.800 --> 17:12.560] precious metals, and coin supplies in the Austin metro area. We also ship worldwide. [17:12.560 --> 17:16.600] We are a family-owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin [17:16.600 --> 17:22.120] and metals purchases. We buy, sell, trade, and consign rare coins, gold and silver coin [17:22.120 --> 17:27.440] collections, precious metals, and scrap gold. We will purchase and sell gold and jewelry [17:27.440 --> 17:34.040] items as well. We offer daily specials on coins and bullion. We're located at 5448 Barnett [17:34.040 --> 17:39.960] Road, Suite 3, and we're open Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturdays, 10 [17:39.960 --> 17:44.480] a.m. to 5 p.m. You are welcome to stop in our shop during regular business hours or [17:44.480 --> 17:52.200] call 512-646-6440 with any questions. Ask for Chad and say you heard about us on Rule [17:52.200 --> 18:15.200] of Law Radio or 90.1-FM. That's Capital Coin and Bullion, 512-646-6440. [18:22.200 --> 18:49.200] We are open Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. to 5 p.m. to 6 p.m. to 5 p.m. [18:49.200 --> 19:10.400] to 6 p.m. to 5 p.m. to 6 p.m. to 6 p.m. to 5 p.m. to 5 p.m. to 5 p.m. to 5 a.m. decorated [19:10.400 --> 19:11.400] items. [19:11.400 --> 19:12.900] What's your answer? [19:13.000 --> 19:14.400] So, please, please, please. [19:14.500 --> 19:15.400] Here, I'm here. [19:15.500 --> 19:19.400] Them a tear you, them a tear me, Lord, them a tear the country. [19:19.500 --> 19:20.400] Here, I'm here. [19:20.500 --> 19:24.400] Them a tear me, them a tear you and them a tear the country. [19:24.500 --> 19:29.400] Them a tear up the casketous and them rip it in three, then give a damn about who. [19:29.500 --> 19:34.400] You know, see how this country, how them a lead we, them a lead we, you see. [19:34.500 --> 19:39.400] Like we blind and we crazy, them lead in with destruction, you see. [19:39.400 --> 19:44.400] You play weapon and big gun, then my point from the country, I love me. [19:44.400 --> 19:49.400] Here I am, then I fear you, then I fear me, Lord, then I fear the country. [19:49.400 --> 19:54.400] Here I am, then I fear you, then I fear me, Lord, then I fear the country. [19:54.400 --> 19:59.400] We are the Christians. [19:59.400 --> 20:04.400] We don't have the answers. [20:04.400 --> 20:09.400] But we ask the Christians. [20:09.400 --> 20:14.400] They don't have the answers. [20:14.400 --> 20:19.400] We have to question, it's about the working scheme, them look on him like on the Christian clean. [20:19.400 --> 20:24.400] We have to question why they need to we hold nuclear weapon in our country. [20:24.400 --> 20:29.400] When I find no bomb, no gun, why the hell we have children to see? [20:29.400 --> 20:34.400] I send them overseas in army and Lord may lead, what them do to me? [20:34.400 --> 20:39.400] Them not been gone crazy, no them won't be, I'll come tell me. [20:39.400 --> 20:44.400] How multi sign, multi service, and multi join up for some army. [20:44.400 --> 20:49.400] Okay, folks, we are back. [20:49.400 --> 20:57.400] Okay, so I'm a little bit confused because on the one hand, Eddie's saying that they would have to throw out 200 years of case law [20:57.400 --> 21:00.400] in order to rule against Eddie's argument. [21:00.400 --> 21:05.400] But Randy, you're saying they would have to throw out 200 years of case law to rule in favor of Eddie's argument. [21:05.400 --> 21:07.400] So which one is it? What's going on here? [21:07.400 --> 21:18.400] Well, I'm not saying 200 years, but what Eddie's saying is based on this, [21:18.400 --> 21:32.400] they would have to at least throw out that section of 1406, that section B that they put in in 65 [21:32.400 --> 21:36.400] that allowed a police officer to arrest for anything he chose. [21:36.400 --> 21:39.400] They would have to take that part out. [21:39.400 --> 21:41.400] Well, not necessarily. [21:41.400 --> 21:49.400] What they wouldn't have to is because these would then become civil offenses for which arrest cannot be had. [21:49.400 --> 21:57.400] The malaprohibita has always been what we first got insulted over by the definition of a victimless crime. [21:57.400 --> 22:02.400] And a victimless crime by definition really cannot exist. [22:02.400 --> 22:08.400] Somebody has to have been harmed, and there has to be somebody that committed that harm. [22:08.400 --> 22:11.400] And those acts he could still arrest for. [22:11.400 --> 22:18.400] But the malaprohibita that does not involve a harm, they would have to be civil in nature from that point on, [22:18.400 --> 22:22.400] and the arrest would not be allowed. [22:22.400 --> 22:24.400] So they would not have to remove it. [22:24.400 --> 22:32.400] They'd just have to redefine these particular things as civil offenses rather than criminal. [22:32.400 --> 22:40.400] So anything that doesn't involve violence or the threat of violence. [22:40.400 --> 22:43.400] Correct. [22:43.400 --> 22:48.400] Or anything that would be a felony would also constitute a breach of the peace [22:48.400 --> 22:59.400] because there will be a harmed individual in every instance of a felony. [22:59.400 --> 23:05.400] It seems on its face when you consider it, it seems appropriate. [23:05.400 --> 23:13.400] It seems as though from that perspective it would fit the intent of the legislature. [23:13.400 --> 23:19.400] It would fit the intent of the Founding Fathers, too. [23:19.400 --> 23:24.400] Well, yeah, it seems to me just from a commonsense standpoint, [23:24.400 --> 23:27.400] especially looking at it from the point of view of the Founding Fathers, [23:27.400 --> 23:33.400] I don't think the Founding Fathers ever intended that anyone's liberty be taken away from them [23:33.400 --> 23:36.400] even just for the purpose of an arrest, [23:36.400 --> 23:42.400] unless it is found with probable cause right off the bat that that person is causing violence [23:42.400 --> 23:46.400] or causing some kind of physical damage to somebody else. [23:46.400 --> 23:51.400] I mean, just crimes against the state, i.e., you know, [23:51.400 --> 23:55.400] I just don't see how those should ever be arrestable offenses. [23:55.400 --> 23:58.400] I don't see how anybody should lose their liberty [23:58.400 --> 24:02.400] because of a so-called crime against the state. [24:02.400 --> 24:04.400] If you're not physically harming somebody else, [24:04.400 --> 24:07.400] I don't see how you're committing a crime anyway. [24:07.400 --> 24:10.400] That's the position of the Founding Fathers. [24:10.400 --> 24:15.400] So I'd have to agree with Eddie on this one. [24:15.400 --> 24:19.400] That's always been the majority of the patriot community's position as well. [24:19.400 --> 24:23.400] How can you accuse me of a crime when you can't produce an injured party [24:23.400 --> 24:28.400] and then Randy's argument that the courts have put forward [24:28.400 --> 24:33.400] that the state argues harm because of violation of the statute? [24:33.400 --> 24:37.400] Well, the state has no evidence of a harm. [24:37.400 --> 24:41.400] All they would have in that case would be the agreement by the public, [24:41.400 --> 24:47.400] the presumed agreement by the public, to abide by that civil statute. [24:47.400 --> 24:53.400] Now we're back to the radical interpretation of consent of the governed [24:53.400 --> 25:00.400] actually meaning what it says. [25:00.400 --> 25:02.400] You want to charge me a $500 fine for what? [25:02.400 --> 25:04.400] Oh, no, I'm not consenting to that. [25:04.400 --> 25:09.400] You can't show that I harmed anyone or anything in any way, shape, or form, [25:09.400 --> 25:11.400] and you want $500 of my money? [25:11.400 --> 25:17.400] No, I'm not consenting. [25:17.400 --> 25:22.400] And see, the utter idiocy of this criminal complaint system they've got [25:22.400 --> 25:25.400] is that when they make the complaint and charge a fine, [25:25.400 --> 25:28.400] does the person harmed get the money? [25:28.400 --> 25:32.400] No, the state keeps it all. [25:32.400 --> 25:37.400] Exactly what kind of justice does that entail when the state makes the [25:37.400 --> 25:42.400] accusation and then collects the money and then keeps it [25:42.400 --> 25:46.400] and nothing goes to the victim? [25:46.400 --> 25:50.400] And they're the ones that were actually harmed. [25:50.400 --> 25:58.400] I've had a problem with that for a long time as the way they do things. [25:58.400 --> 26:04.400] Yeah, these consumer protection laws, the FDCPA and the TCPA [26:04.400 --> 26:09.400] and the laws that Mike Mears deals with, those are exceptions to the rule. [26:09.400 --> 26:15.400] The victim of the crime actually gets the fine in that situation. [26:15.400 --> 26:21.400] Yeah, that is the actual exception to the rules because the majority of the [26:21.400 --> 26:29.400] time the victim will get nothing and the state will keep it all. [26:29.400 --> 26:37.400] I like the idea that a penalty for a criminal act go to the aggrieved party [26:37.400 --> 26:38.400] and not the state. [26:38.400 --> 26:44.400] It eliminates motivation of the state to prosecute for profit. [26:44.400 --> 26:46.400] Exactly. [26:46.400 --> 26:48.400] That's exactly right. [26:48.400 --> 26:49.400] It was never intended. [26:49.400 --> 26:53.400] There is no court in the land that's going to ever convince me with any [26:53.400 --> 26:56.400] amount of argument the Founding Fathers intended for our police to be [26:56.400 --> 26:58.400] revenue officers. [26:58.400 --> 27:02.400] After fighting everything over every tax you can imagine, they're going to [27:02.400 --> 27:04.400] say, oh, yeah, well, it's okay. [27:04.400 --> 27:09.400] I don't think so. [27:09.400 --> 27:14.400] And any judge that wants to argue that the history shows that they would is [27:14.400 --> 27:17.400] out of his ever-loving judicial bench tree. [27:17.400 --> 27:22.400] He's an idiot. [27:22.400 --> 27:28.400] Well, as I think about it, in terms of being in a position to argue this [27:28.400 --> 27:37.400] before a jury, I think this could become a rather compelling argument against [27:37.400 --> 27:44.400] the penal laws being a source of income for the state. [27:44.400 --> 27:48.400] They charge court costs already. [27:48.400 --> 27:58.400] Therefore, any fine should be a penalty instead of a fine, and the penalty [27:58.400 --> 28:01.400] would have to have an injured party. [28:01.400 --> 28:07.400] Yeah, a restitution-type penalty. [28:07.400 --> 28:14.400] It would be a radical shift, but the more I listen to it, the more it sounds [28:14.400 --> 28:18.400] sellable. [28:18.400 --> 28:21.400] That's good, because this is something unless somebody comes up with an [28:21.400 --> 28:24.400] ample way to refute it, this is going in the material to take before the [28:24.400 --> 28:26.400] legislature. [28:26.400 --> 28:28.400] That's what I'm thinking. [28:28.400 --> 28:34.400] With the mood of the public, nobody seems to be asleep anymore. [28:34.400 --> 28:41.400] The public seems to be well aware that the legal system and the entire system [28:41.400 --> 28:44.400] is in a terrible mess. [28:44.400 --> 28:51.400] This may be opportunity to get some serious changes in there to return [28:51.400 --> 28:56.400] criminal justice to its original intent of criminal justice and not as an [28:56.400 --> 29:07.400] unauthorized tax against the public, which it has become. [29:07.400 --> 29:13.400] And take the jacks off the boots of our thugs we've got as policemen and [29:13.400 --> 29:18.400] return them to real policemen like they were intended to be. [29:18.400 --> 29:20.400] Now, Randy, I'm a bit concerned. [29:20.400 --> 29:24.400] It sounds like you're beginning to agree with me. [29:24.400 --> 29:25.400] I must be losing my touch. [29:25.400 --> 29:28.400] I can't keep you on pins and needles anymore. [29:28.400 --> 29:35.400] I'm off my game today. [29:35.400 --> 29:39.400] All right, folks, if y'all would like to call in 512-646-1984, we do have a [29:39.400 --> 29:41.400] caller on the line, Anthony from Texas. [29:41.400 --> 29:44.400] Would you guys like to take Anthony's call and we get back? [29:44.400 --> 29:45.400] Yeah, sure. [29:45.400 --> 29:46.400] Okay, Anthony, just stay on the line. [29:46.400 --> 29:48.400] We're going to go to you when we get back on the other side. [29:48.400 --> 29:49.400] All right. [29:49.400 --> 30:01.400] And callers, if you'd like to call in 512-646-1984, we will be right back. [30:01.400 --> 30:04.400] Top ten reasons to question the official story of the Oklahoma City bombing. [30:04.400 --> 30:07.400] Reason number ten, what is on the surveillance tapes? [30:07.400 --> 30:09.400] There were many video surveillance cameras that recorded the morning of [30:09.400 --> 30:12.400] the bombing, yet the few of these that have been released do not show what [30:12.400 --> 30:14.400] transpired with the Ryder truck at the Murrah Building. [30:14.400 --> 30:17.400] Most recently, the government has claimed that all of the cameras that were [30:17.400 --> 30:20.400] in different buildings and maintained by different businesses were all having [30:20.400 --> 30:23.400] their tapes changed at the exact same time, 9.02 a.m. [30:23.400 --> 30:26.400] This is insulting to the memory of those who perished in the bombing. [30:26.400 --> 30:27.400] What is being hidden from us? [30:27.400 --> 30:31.400] For more information, please go to okcbombingtruth.com. [30:31.400 --> 30:34.400] Have you ever fed your family cornflakes or sent your kid off to school with a [30:34.400 --> 30:35.400] juice box? [30:35.400 --> 30:36.400] If so, look out. [30:36.400 --> 30:39.400] You might be sending them off to a lifetime of health problems. [30:39.400 --> 30:43.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht, and I'll identify the culprit in just a moment. [30:43.400 --> 30:47.400] Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for and [30:47.400 --> 30:50.400] creating a massive database of your personal information. [30:50.400 --> 30:51.400] That's creepy. [30:51.400 --> 30:53.400] But it doesn't have to be that way. [30:53.400 --> 30:56.400] Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine. [30:56.400 --> 31:00.400] Startpage.com doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches, [31:00.400 --> 31:03.400] or use tracking cookies, and they're third-party certified. [31:03.400 --> 31:07.400] If you don't like Big Brother spying on you, start over with Startpage. [31:07.400 --> 31:10.400] Great search results and total privacy. [31:10.400 --> 31:13.400] Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [31:13.400 --> 31:17.400] Many breakfast cereals, juice drinks, and other products contain high fructose [31:17.400 --> 31:18.400] corn syrup. [31:18.400 --> 31:21.400] Well, it's no secret that too much sugar will expand your waistline. [31:21.400 --> 31:24.400] When that sweetener is in the form of high fructose corn syrup, [31:24.400 --> 31:26.400] you put your body at risk for disease. [31:26.400 --> 31:30.400] We're talking high blood pressure, obesity, especially in children, [31:30.400 --> 31:34.400] high cholesterol, and insulin resistance that can lead to type 2 diabetes, [31:34.400 --> 31:35.400] and that's just part of it. [31:35.400 --> 31:38.400] Food manufacturers have to list their ingredients on all packaging. [31:38.400 --> 31:41.400] Unfortunately, many are now providing alternatives. [31:41.400 --> 31:44.400] So the next time you reach for the cookies, ketchup, or barbecue sauce, [31:44.400 --> 31:45.400] check the label. [31:45.400 --> 31:48.400] The life you save may be your child's. [31:48.400 --> 31:50.400] This is Dr. Katherine Albrecht. [31:50.400 --> 32:00.400] More news and information at KatherineAlbrecht.com. [32:20.400 --> 32:47.400] Thank you. [32:47.400 --> 33:04.400] Thank you. [33:04.400 --> 33:19.400] Thank you. [33:19.400 --> 33:34.400] Thank you. [33:34.400 --> 33:49.400] Thank you. [33:49.400 --> 34:16.400] Thank you. [34:16.400 --> 34:19.400] Okay, folks, we are back. [34:19.400 --> 34:21.400] We're taking your calls. [34:21.400 --> 34:24.400] We are going to speak with Anthony in Texas. [34:24.400 --> 34:25.400] Anthony, thanks for calling in. [34:25.400 --> 34:28.400] What's on your mind tonight? [34:28.400 --> 34:30.400] Hi, how are y'all doing? [34:30.400 --> 34:31.400] Pretty good. [34:31.400 --> 34:33.400] So give us the update, Anthony. [34:33.400 --> 34:38.400] Well, I haven't asked for my file yet because I don't want to call in. [34:38.400 --> 34:41.400] Because you were saying don't call in because then that helps them to get [34:41.400 --> 34:42.400] better prepared. [34:42.400 --> 34:45.400] Yeah, you just have to go down there and get a copy of the file. [34:45.400 --> 34:48.400] Yeah, I'm trying to get all my sister to get me that because I'm in school [34:48.400 --> 34:49.400] and all that stuff. [34:49.400 --> 34:51.400] I don't have that time for that. [34:51.400 --> 34:55.400] But I was asking how would I follow different motions at my arraignment or [34:55.400 --> 34:59.400] what motions should I follow at my arraignment? [34:59.400 --> 35:00.400] Because I'm not sure how to do that. [35:00.400 --> 35:08.400] I'm not like with who and how would you do that? [35:08.400 --> 35:09.400] Randy? [35:09.400 --> 35:10.400] Randy, are you still there? [35:10.400 --> 35:11.400] Wait a minute. [35:11.400 --> 35:14.400] This is Anthony. [35:14.400 --> 35:15.400] With the garage. [35:15.400 --> 35:19.400] I'm missing a part of the lead up. [35:19.400 --> 35:20.400] Okay. [35:20.400 --> 35:24.400] As far as he knows, this is Anthony with the situation in the garage. [35:24.400 --> 35:25.400] Remember, Randy? [35:25.400 --> 35:26.400] Yes, yes. [35:26.400 --> 35:27.400] Okay. [35:27.400 --> 35:33.400] And as far as we know, there hasn't been a case filed against him yet. [35:33.400 --> 35:36.400] The prosecutor is still holding on to the information. [35:36.400 --> 35:40.400] But he's got an arraignment coming up and they rescheduled the arraignment from [35:40.400 --> 35:44.400] the first time because there wasn't anything filed yet. [35:44.400 --> 35:47.400] And I told him that, you know, in that situation, [35:47.400 --> 35:52.400] he should have immediately filed a motion to dismiss. [35:52.400 --> 35:53.400] Okay. [35:53.400 --> 35:56.400] Yes, he should make special appearance, motion to dismiss, [35:56.400 --> 35:59.400] like a subject matter jurisdiction, illegal search and seizure, [35:59.400 --> 36:05.400] and arrest without warrant and probable cause. [36:05.400 --> 36:09.400] And I would do that at my arraignment, like the next one I have? [36:09.400 --> 36:10.400] Yes. [36:10.400 --> 36:11.400] But you do it in writing. [36:11.400 --> 36:13.400] You do it with written motions. [36:13.400 --> 36:15.400] Don't ever do it verbally. [36:15.400 --> 36:18.400] And how, where do I get these written motions? [36:18.400 --> 36:20.400] Well, you create them. [36:20.400 --> 36:23.400] You have to write them. [36:23.400 --> 36:24.400] I just write them out. [36:24.400 --> 36:28.400] Just write a piece of paper and just write out my motion to dismiss [36:28.400 --> 36:33.400] and for illegal search. [36:33.400 --> 36:35.400] Well, kind of. [36:35.400 --> 36:39.400] If you go to Randy's website, Juris Imprudens, Randy, [36:39.400 --> 36:41.400] you want to tell him because you'll know more about where they're [36:41.400 --> 36:43.400] actually located than I do. [36:43.400 --> 36:47.400] Yeah, and Randy, there's a lot of background noise on your end too. [36:47.400 --> 36:51.400] So we were having a hard time understanding Anthony just to let you know. [36:51.400 --> 36:54.400] Okay. [36:54.400 --> 37:03.400] Yes, you can go to Juris Imprudens, go to blanks or to Top Frog on the right. [37:03.400 --> 37:11.400] They can take you to the documents and research and look under blanks. [37:11.400 --> 37:21.400] But on your particular case, there are a number of documents you can file. [37:21.400 --> 37:28.400] What I'm thinking in particular is if you were arrested, [37:28.400 --> 37:31.400] you had to have had an examining trial. [37:31.400 --> 37:35.400] The magistrate had a duty to seal all the documents had in the hearing [37:35.400 --> 37:37.400] because the names were written across the seal for them [37:37.400 --> 37:40.400] to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction. [37:40.400 --> 37:45.400] Since that hasn't happened and the prosecutor has this file, [37:45.400 --> 37:48.400] you should file felony charges of tampering with the government document [37:48.400 --> 37:50.400] against the prosecuting attorney. [37:50.400 --> 37:52.400] Okay. [37:52.400 --> 37:55.400] Do you ever remember the time we made that claim in Williamson County [37:55.400 --> 38:00.400] and they got real excited about it? [38:00.400 --> 38:05.400] This thing of them bringing you to court when no one's ever filed a complaint [38:05.400 --> 38:12.400] against you, that complaint was commanded to be in the record of the court. [38:12.400 --> 38:17.400] It was commanded to be forwarded to the court by the magistrate [38:17.400 --> 38:22.400] who found probable cause and set bail. [38:22.400 --> 38:26.400] He didn't do that and that's why they can't try you [38:26.400 --> 38:33.400] because somebody misdirected the paperwork from the clerk of the court [38:33.400 --> 38:36.400] to someone else. [38:36.400 --> 38:41.400] Were you in Williamson County or Travis? [38:41.400 --> 38:44.400] No, I'm in San Patricio. [38:44.400 --> 38:46.400] Wait, you're in where? [38:46.400 --> 38:48.400] San Patricio. [38:48.400 --> 38:49.400] Oh, San Patricio County. [38:49.400 --> 38:51.400] Okay, so they're not aware about this. [38:51.400 --> 38:54.400] I was thinking you were at or near Austin. [38:54.400 --> 38:58.400] I must be mixing you up with someone else. [38:58.400 --> 39:01.400] They're not particularly aware of this argument. [39:01.400 --> 39:11.400] You might get out Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and look up 17.30. [39:11.400 --> 39:13.400] First look up 17.05. [39:13.400 --> 39:17.400] That says bail, when bail is taken. [39:17.400 --> 39:23.400] Bail is taken by a magistrate after an examining trial. [39:23.400 --> 39:26.400] That's the only time a magistrate can take bail. [39:26.400 --> 39:29.400] Well, in this case the magistrate took bail. [39:29.400 --> 39:33.400] Well, there had to be an examining trial for him to do that. [39:33.400 --> 39:39.400] 17.30 tells the magistrate what he's required to do with the paperwork [39:39.400 --> 39:41.400] after the examining trial. [39:41.400 --> 39:45.400] He's to certify all the proceedings. [39:45.400 --> 39:48.400] He can't seal all papers, all documents, head in the instrument, [39:48.400 --> 39:52.400] cause his name to be written across the seal of the envelope [39:52.400 --> 39:55.400] and forward it to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction. [39:55.400 --> 39:58.400] Well, apparently he didn't do that. [39:58.400 --> 40:04.400] And because of that you're being forced to come to court repeatedly [40:04.400 --> 40:06.400] with no charges filed against you. [40:06.400 --> 40:08.400] You've been arrested, bound at your liberty, [40:08.400 --> 40:11.400] but nobody's ever filed a criminal complaint against you [40:11.400 --> 40:15.400] with the court of competent jurisdiction. [40:15.400 --> 40:20.400] And the reason that didn't happen is the magistrate committed a violation [40:20.400 --> 40:25.400] of 37.10 Texas Penal Code, [40:25.400 --> 40:29.400] which is called tampering with a government document. [40:29.400 --> 40:35.400] And the attorney, whoever has these documents, [40:35.400 --> 40:40.400] also violated 37.10 because he has those documents [40:40.400 --> 40:43.400] to the exclusion of the clerk of the court. [40:43.400 --> 40:48.400] 37.10 says if anyone secrets a government document [40:48.400 --> 40:54.400] from the person or office it's directed to, that's a violation. [40:54.400 --> 40:58.400] That's what the magistrate did. [40:58.400 --> 41:02.400] He secreted them to the prosecuting attorney. [41:02.400 --> 41:08.400] That's also a violation of 37.10 in that the prosecuting attorney [41:08.400 --> 41:13.400] holds the documents to the exclusion of the clerk of the court. [41:13.400 --> 41:18.400] Therefore he's secreting the documents from the person or department [41:18.400 --> 41:20.400] they're directed to. [41:20.400 --> 41:24.400] I would go in with charges against both of them. [41:24.400 --> 41:30.400] And in the section on documents and research in the section on blanks, [41:30.400 --> 41:39.400] pull down the blank criminal complaint and fill it out. [41:39.400 --> 41:44.400] The criminal complaint is pretty self-explanatory. [41:44.400 --> 41:51.400] It says I, my name, have reason to believe and do believe, [41:51.400 --> 41:55.400] based on the following, that any state facts. [41:55.400 --> 42:02.400] You were arrested on a certain date, bail was set on that date, [42:02.400 --> 42:05.400] you were released on bail, you were ordered to court, [42:05.400 --> 42:10.400] and the records held by the magistrate in making the determination of bail [42:10.400 --> 42:12.400] were not in the possession of the court. [42:12.400 --> 42:13.400] Now, Randy, let me ask you something. [42:13.400 --> 42:18.400] Is there an age requirement to filing criminal complaints? [42:18.400 --> 42:19.400] Yes, there is. [42:19.400 --> 42:20.400] You have to be 18, right? [42:20.400 --> 42:21.400] I have to be 18. [42:21.400 --> 42:23.400] Are you 18 yet, Anthony? [42:23.400 --> 42:25.400] No, ma'am, I'm still 17. [42:25.400 --> 42:27.400] Okay, so he can't file a criminal complaint. [42:27.400 --> 42:28.400] That's why I asked that question. [42:28.400 --> 42:31.400] His parents can. [42:31.400 --> 42:34.400] His parents could, but what about the motions to dismiss [42:34.400 --> 42:37.400] and the other motions that he would file in his defense? [42:37.400 --> 42:38.400] He can file those. [42:38.400 --> 42:39.400] He's the one being prosecuted. [42:39.400 --> 42:40.400] He can file those. [42:40.400 --> 42:41.400] Right. [42:41.400 --> 42:45.400] Now, where would he get examples of these documents? [42:45.400 --> 42:47.400] Okay, let me explain motion then. [42:47.400 --> 42:52.400] We don't have every motion you can think of written up. [42:52.400 --> 42:57.400] A motion is simply a letter, like a business letter. [42:57.400 --> 43:01.400] A business letter has a specific form. [43:01.400 --> 43:06.400] A motion is similar in that it has a specific form. [43:06.400 --> 43:09.400] The heading on a business letter will generally have your name [43:09.400 --> 43:15.400] and address, the sender, and the name and address of the recipient. [43:15.400 --> 43:18.400] A motion has a somewhat different form, and it has the name [43:18.400 --> 43:23.400] of the plaintiff versus the name of the defendant. [43:23.400 --> 43:25.400] And it has a line, and then on the other side, [43:25.400 --> 43:29.400] it has the name of the court and the cause number. [43:29.400 --> 43:37.400] And underneath that, there's a music playing [43:37.400 --> 43:39.400] that tells us we're fixing to go to work. [43:39.400 --> 43:43.400] And when we come back from break, I'll get into more specifics [43:43.400 --> 43:47.400] of how to file a simple complaint. [43:47.400 --> 43:51.400] This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Root of Law Radio. [43:51.400 --> 43:53.400] We'll be right back. [43:53.400 --> 44:04.400] Special Roast Hemp Coffee from HempUSA.org. [44:04.400 --> 44:06.400] Our coffee grows in the dense volcanic rich soil, [44:06.400 --> 44:08.400] herbicide and pesticide free, [44:08.400 --> 44:10.400] and in the high altitudes of Guatemala [44:10.400 --> 44:13.400] in conditions that are ideal for natural growth [44:13.400 --> 44:14.400] of this high quality coffee. [44:14.400 --> 44:17.400] Try our mellow cup of coffee that is ground and roasted [44:17.400 --> 44:19.400] with 25% hemp seed from Canada [44:19.400 --> 44:23.400] with a wonderful nutty flavor that contains 18% protein. [44:23.400 --> 44:25.400] Our roasters bring a unique flavor [44:25.400 --> 44:28.400] that makes this the best cup of coffee you'll ever have. [44:28.400 --> 44:31.400] Try our new Special Roast Hemp Coffee from HempUSA.org [44:31.400 --> 44:34.400] and wake up your brain without the jitters. [44:34.400 --> 44:37.400] Our customers look forward to their next cup of hemp coffee. [44:37.400 --> 44:44.400] Visit us at HempUSA.org or call 908-691-2608. [44:44.400 --> 44:49.400] That's 908-691-2608 and see if you'll change your mind [44:49.400 --> 44:51.400] about drinking coffee again. [44:51.400 --> 44:56.400] Taste the difference, feel the difference at HempUSA.org today. [44:56.400 --> 45:16.400] If you did not have any problem, where you gonna go for one. [45:16.400 --> 45:21.400] If you could not wait any battle, would you perhaps pass me by. [45:21.400 --> 45:24.400] I have to stand down and I'm a soldier, a warrior of love, [45:24.400 --> 45:26.400] Scaffolding the keepers' heat. [45:26.400 --> 45:30.400] All they're taking is a misunderstanding. [45:30.400 --> 45:32.400] Somebody calls the police. [45:32.400 --> 45:56.400] Watching the sparks fly. [45:56.400 --> 45:58.400] Preaching isn't addiction. [45:58.400 --> 46:02.400] The hard work can leave you cold as nails. [46:02.400 --> 46:05.400] There's a hostility towards tranquility. [46:05.400 --> 46:08.400] A heavy load of safe and unscathed. [46:08.400 --> 46:11.400] The time is colliding with the compass. [46:11.400 --> 46:14.400] You find out after a while. [46:14.400 --> 46:16.400] It's not your moral standard. [46:16.400 --> 46:19.400] It's your patience that's on trial. [46:19.400 --> 46:41.400] Watching the sparks fly. [46:41.400 --> 46:42.400] Okay, we're back. [46:42.400 --> 46:45.400] Randy Kelton, Eddie Stevens, Debra Craig. [46:45.400 --> 46:46.400] Wait a minute. [46:46.400 --> 46:49.400] You got the names wrong. [46:49.400 --> 46:53.400] You got the whole thing all messed up, Randy. [46:53.400 --> 46:55.400] Is Jerry there? [46:55.400 --> 46:58.400] Just say it's Eddie, Randy, and Debra. [46:58.400 --> 46:59.400] How about that? [46:59.400 --> 47:02.400] Let's keep it simple. [47:02.400 --> 47:06.400] Okay, actually I was kind of distracted [47:06.400 --> 47:11.400] because this is a hard thing to do. [47:11.400 --> 47:16.400] I have someone young and energetic [47:16.400 --> 47:20.400] and wanting to take on the system. [47:20.400 --> 47:24.400] And I'm running through my mind trying to figure out [47:24.400 --> 47:27.400] how he can do that. [47:27.400 --> 47:32.400] And in the end, you can't. [47:32.400 --> 47:36.400] I know you don't like hearing this, [47:36.400 --> 47:39.400] but you're out of your league. [47:39.400 --> 47:42.400] You're dealing with a bunch of officials [47:42.400 --> 47:44.400] who absolutely could care less [47:44.400 --> 47:49.400] about the law they claim to adjudicate. [47:49.400 --> 47:53.400] We get people who have a lot of knowledge and experience [47:53.400 --> 47:57.400] and get before these guys, and it's very difficult. [47:57.400 --> 48:03.400] You neither have the knowledge or experience. [48:03.400 --> 48:07.400] Neither do you have the, well, let's say knowledge or experience. [48:07.400 --> 48:10.400] You have the knowledge, and primarily you don't have [48:10.400 --> 48:15.400] the experience of fighting for yourself [48:15.400 --> 48:23.400] in a structured capacity to be able to deal with these guys. [48:23.400 --> 48:28.400] It's like taking a third string guard [48:28.400 --> 48:32.400] and putting him in front of a first string center. [48:32.400 --> 48:34.400] You're going to get creamed. [48:34.400 --> 48:37.400] Anthony, what do your parents have to say about this? [48:37.400 --> 48:40.400] I mean, do your folks, are they wanting to help you [48:40.400 --> 48:42.400] fight this thing, pro se? [48:42.400 --> 48:43.400] Or what's going on? [48:43.400 --> 48:45.400] Are they listening to this show, too? [48:45.400 --> 48:46.400] I mean, what's happening? [48:46.400 --> 48:48.400] Yeah, we're recording it, too, [48:48.400 --> 48:51.400] so just in case if I don't get everything down, [48:51.400 --> 48:56.400] we can listen back and go on from there. [48:56.400 --> 49:00.400] They're the ones that need to pick up this mantle. [49:00.400 --> 49:02.400] They're the ones that need to file [49:02.400 --> 49:04.400] complaints against the officials. [49:04.400 --> 49:05.400] Okay. [49:05.400 --> 49:08.400] Especially the police officers that broke into the garage [49:08.400 --> 49:11.400] and searched it illegally. [49:11.400 --> 49:16.400] Right, because it's their property. [49:16.400 --> 49:22.400] And in this case, they can't claim that they could put a GPS device on it [49:22.400 --> 49:24.400] because they could just walk up there and stick it on it. [49:24.400 --> 49:29.400] They had to force them with loaded weapons to open the door, [49:29.400 --> 49:37.400] and they can't pretend like they didn't recognize that door as a barrier. [49:37.400 --> 49:39.400] So in this case... [49:39.400 --> 49:43.400] The same could be said for their brains. [49:43.400 --> 49:45.400] Well, at this point, police don't care anymore. [49:45.400 --> 49:48.400] They have no need to. [49:48.400 --> 49:56.400] Law is not adjudicated when the police violate the law. [49:56.400 --> 50:03.400] Under, I think it's 2204 B2A, [50:03.400 --> 50:08.400] what they committed was first-degree felony aggravated assault, [50:08.400 --> 50:12.400] but never ever has that been adjudicated. [50:12.400 --> 50:17.400] Now, assault against a public official acting in his official capacity, [50:17.400 --> 50:20.400] there are thousands of those, [50:20.400 --> 50:22.400] but a public official committing aggravated assault [50:22.400 --> 50:28.400] while acting under color of his authority, never ever has anyone been prosecuted [50:28.400 --> 50:31.400] for that first-degree felony. [50:31.400 --> 50:37.400] Well, Randy, as far as the motions that Anthony would file in his own case, [50:37.400 --> 50:41.400] I mean, we're talking likely motion to dismiss, [50:41.400 --> 50:44.400] especially at the arraignment if it turns out [50:44.400 --> 50:48.400] that there hasn't even been a case filed against him yet, things like that. [50:48.400 --> 50:53.400] Are there some examples of these kinds of documents on your website? [50:53.400 --> 50:55.400] Or you were mentioning something on the break [50:55.400 --> 50:58.400] about him going ahead and getting a public defender [50:58.400 --> 51:01.400] and then hammering on the public defender. [51:01.400 --> 51:04.400] What are some good strategies here for Anthony? [51:04.400 --> 51:06.400] Okay. [51:06.400 --> 51:08.400] Before you get a... [51:08.400 --> 51:12.400] I suggest that you ask for court-appointed counsel, [51:12.400 --> 51:15.400] and then the first thing you tell court-appointed counsel, [51:15.400 --> 51:20.400] you make one move I don't like, and I'll file a bar grievance against you. [51:20.400 --> 51:26.400] Now, if they don't like me filing it because I'm 17, I get my dad to file it. [51:26.400 --> 51:27.400] I did this... [51:27.400 --> 51:28.400] How do you file one of those? [51:28.400 --> 51:30.400] Oh, that's a piece of cake. [51:30.400 --> 51:36.400] You can go right on to the Texas Bar Association website, [51:36.400 --> 51:40.400] pull down the form, it's easy enough to fill out, [51:40.400 --> 51:46.400] and just send it right back to them. [51:46.400 --> 51:48.400] And who do I give it to, what I give it to the... [51:48.400 --> 51:51.400] You file that with the Bar Association. [51:51.400 --> 51:52.400] Oh, okay. [51:52.400 --> 51:54.400] Yeah, the instructions are right there on the side. [51:54.400 --> 51:55.400] All right. [51:55.400 --> 51:56.400] And that part is easy. [51:56.400 --> 52:01.400] This is what I did to my attorney when I forced them to appoint me counsel [52:01.400 --> 52:07.400] when they arrested me at the Secretary of State's building. [52:07.400 --> 52:10.400] And when I let my attorney know that one move I don't like, [52:10.400 --> 52:14.400] and I file a bar grievance against you, it terrified him. [52:14.400 --> 52:16.400] Now, Randy, what about filing a motion to dismiss? [52:16.400 --> 52:19.400] See, what I'm thinking is that the next time he's got this arraignment, [52:19.400 --> 52:22.400] they're still not going to have a case filed against him. [52:22.400 --> 52:27.400] I mean, the court rescheduled the first arraignment because there was no case. [52:27.400 --> 52:32.400] Can Anthony get himself together a motion to dismiss [52:32.400 --> 52:36.400] so that the next time there's an arraignment, [52:36.400 --> 52:41.400] see, what happened was the court told him to call ahead of time [52:41.400 --> 52:44.400] to find out if the case had been filed against him yet. [52:44.400 --> 52:47.400] And so, in other words, give the court a heads up. [52:47.400 --> 52:48.400] So that's exactly what happened. [52:48.400 --> 52:51.400] And then the court said, oh, yeah, well, you know, actually, [52:51.400 --> 52:53.400] there's not a case filed against you yet. [52:53.400 --> 52:55.400] So, yeah, we're going to reschedule the arraignment. [52:55.400 --> 52:58.400] And so what I told Anthony next time, don't call. [52:58.400 --> 53:01.400] Just show up for the arraignment hearing. [53:01.400 --> 53:05.400] And if there's no case filed against him, then file a motion to dismiss. [53:05.400 --> 53:07.400] Would we at least set him up with that? [53:07.400 --> 53:13.400] Well, the problem is, what's there to dismiss? [53:13.400 --> 53:14.400] There's no case. [53:14.400 --> 53:16.400] Well, then why are they calling him to arraign? [53:16.400 --> 53:21.400] If I charge the court with malicious prosecution. [53:21.400 --> 53:24.400] I'm sorry, not malicious prosecution, abusive process. [53:24.400 --> 53:27.400] What would they be arraigning if there's no case? [53:27.400 --> 53:33.400] That's it, abusive process in that the court has claimed authority [53:33.400 --> 53:36.400] to order him to appear before that court, [53:36.400 --> 53:40.400] and the court has no subject matter jurisdiction. [53:40.400 --> 53:45.400] Because nobody's ever accused him of a crime. [53:45.400 --> 53:56.400] So accuse the court of abusive process that moves the court to disqualify itself. [53:56.400 --> 54:03.400] And get your parents to talk to us on the line. [54:03.400 --> 54:09.400] I plan tomorrow to do a show on due process. [54:09.400 --> 54:12.400] We haven't done that in a long time. [54:12.400 --> 54:16.400] We were going to do it last week, but Mike Mears, we had Mike Mears on. [54:16.400 --> 54:23.400] So this week I'd like to do the first hour and a half to two hours on due process. [54:23.400 --> 54:29.400] We'll walk through what the police are required to do when they do an arrest, [54:29.400 --> 54:34.400] what they're actually doing, what crimes they're committing when they do that. [54:34.400 --> 54:37.400] It would be good if your parents were there, [54:37.400 --> 54:40.400] and we could talk to them afterward on the air. [54:40.400 --> 54:45.400] And once they've been through, they kind of have an idea of where we're going, [54:45.400 --> 54:48.400] then we can show them how to get there. [54:48.400 --> 54:51.400] By there he means listening in. [54:51.400 --> 54:56.400] Okay. [54:56.400 --> 54:59.400] So how would I go and file a motion to dismiss? [54:59.400 --> 55:02.400] Would I write out a motion for that? [55:02.400 --> 55:03.400] Yes. [55:03.400 --> 55:06.400] Okay, like I was saying about motions, a motion's like a letter. [55:06.400 --> 55:07.400] Okay. [55:07.400 --> 55:10.400] Except it starts out generally with jurisdiction, [55:10.400 --> 55:15.400] unless you're already in a court case in which the court is claiming jurisdiction, [55:15.400 --> 55:19.400] so you don't have to say why the court has jurisdiction. [55:19.400 --> 55:23.400] As a matter of fact, in this one you'll say why the court does not have jurisdiction. [55:23.400 --> 55:28.400] You start out with a pleading as opposed to a motion. [55:28.400 --> 55:34.400] Yeah, just don't file one of Randy's without grammar and spell check. [55:34.400 --> 55:41.400] Randy, do you have something on your website, a motion to dismiss somewhere? [55:41.400 --> 55:44.400] I've got motions to dismiss that have been filed in other cases. [55:44.400 --> 55:47.400] Okay, so then he would just need to make the proper changes. [55:47.400 --> 55:49.400] I'm trying to think. [55:49.400 --> 55:53.400] I have a set of motions and I'm trying to think of where I put them. [55:53.400 --> 55:55.400] A rather large set of motions, [55:55.400 --> 55:59.400] a motion to disqualify the prosecutor, arresting officer, magistrate. [55:59.400 --> 56:00.400] Yeah, I found that. [56:00.400 --> 56:01.400] I found that. [56:01.400 --> 56:07.400] I wrote something down to ask you about was the motion to challenge the jurisdiction. [56:07.400 --> 56:08.400] Oh, right. [56:08.400 --> 56:09.400] Good for you. [56:09.400 --> 56:10.400] You've been doing your homework. [56:10.400 --> 56:12.400] That set of motions. [56:12.400 --> 56:16.400] That set of motions has worked before. [56:16.400 --> 56:21.400] We need to just take those motions and adjust them to fit your case. [56:21.400 --> 56:24.400] And I can file these motions at my arraignment or would I? [56:24.400 --> 56:26.400] You file them beforehand. [56:26.400 --> 56:27.400] Beforehand? [56:27.400 --> 56:28.400] Yeah, you don't have to go there. [56:28.400 --> 56:30.400] You can mail them. [56:30.400 --> 56:31.400] I can. [56:31.400 --> 56:35.400] Would they get to the person that's supposed to be? [56:35.400 --> 56:37.400] You mail them to the clerk of the court. [56:37.400 --> 56:38.400] Okay. [56:38.400 --> 56:42.400] Mail them two copies. [56:42.400 --> 56:43.400] Let's see. [56:43.400 --> 56:44.400] What are you? [56:44.400 --> 56:48.400] Is this a municipal court or a county court you're going into? [56:48.400 --> 56:49.400] County. [56:49.400 --> 56:50.400] Okay. [56:50.400 --> 56:59.400] Then two copies to the clerk and put a letter in there with a stamp [56:59.400 --> 57:01.400] self-addressed envelope. [57:01.400 --> 57:05.400] The way I do this when I go to the post office, I'll have two copies. [57:05.400 --> 57:11.400] I'll take one copy with a manila folder and put them together, [57:11.400 --> 57:18.400] have the mail, the post office weigh it and stamp it. [57:18.400 --> 57:23.400] It's addressed to you from the clerk. [57:23.400 --> 57:26.400] And then I fold the folder over the first motion, [57:26.400 --> 57:32.400] stick it in the second envelope with the second motion and a letter. [57:32.400 --> 57:35.400] I have them weigh and stamp that. [57:35.400 --> 57:43.400] The letter asks the clerk to stamp these motions and stamp the second set [57:43.400 --> 57:47.400] and return them to you in the included envelope. [57:47.400 --> 57:49.400] What if they don't return them? [57:49.400 --> 57:50.400] It doesn't matter. [57:50.400 --> 57:51.400] They generally will. [57:51.400 --> 57:52.400] This is something the clerks always do. [57:52.400 --> 57:54.400] They get these every day. [57:54.400 --> 57:55.400] Yeah, they'll return it. [57:55.400 --> 57:56.400] Don't worry about that. [57:56.400 --> 57:57.400] Yeah. [57:57.400 --> 57:59.400] So if you don't receive it within seven or eight days, [57:59.400 --> 58:03.400] then you take a set down to the court, hand it to the clerk, [58:03.400 --> 58:06.400] take two sets, have her stamp one, keep it, stamp the other, [58:06.400 --> 58:08.400] and give it back to you. [58:08.400 --> 58:09.400] You can do it in person, [58:09.400 --> 58:14.400] but it's less problematic if you do it by mail. [58:14.400 --> 58:16.400] And we're about to go to break. [58:16.400 --> 58:17.400] I'll finish this up quickly. [58:17.400 --> 58:19.400] Then we need to go on to other callers. [58:19.400 --> 58:24.400] Yeah, and we'll go over all of this in greater detail tomorrow night [58:24.400 --> 58:27.400] when we do our show and due process. [58:27.400 --> 58:28.400] Okay. [58:28.400 --> 58:30.400] Yes, and have your parents there tomorrow night. [58:30.400 --> 58:31.400] Okay. [58:31.400 --> 58:34.400] They will find it interesting. [58:34.400 --> 58:36.400] I hope. [58:36.400 --> 58:37.400] Okay, folks. [58:37.400 --> 58:39.400] Listen, we're going to break, and when we get back, [58:39.400 --> 58:41.400] Randy's going to finish up on this, [58:41.400 --> 58:43.400] and then we're going to start going to the rest of your calls [58:43.400 --> 58:45.400] because the call board's really stacking up now. [58:45.400 --> 58:49.400] We've got Melissa, Carolyn, Brian, Marshall. [58:49.400 --> 59:02.400] We'll be back after the top of the hour news. [59:19.400 --> 59:44.400] We'll be right back. [59:44.400 --> 01:00:04.400] This news brief brought to you by the International News Next. [01:00:04.400 --> 01:00:06.400] Twelve NATO soldiers were killed Tuesday [01:00:06.400 --> 01:00:09.400] in roadside bombings in southern and eastern Afghanistan [01:00:09.400 --> 01:00:13.400] while insurgent attacks elsewhere claimed eight civilian lives, [01:00:13.400 --> 01:00:18.400] at least five US troops were among those killed. [01:00:18.400 --> 01:00:20.400] Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, [01:00:20.400 --> 01:00:24.400] who deployed 46,000 UK troops alongside US forces [01:00:24.400 --> 01:00:27.400] in the 2003 Iraq invasion, said Wednesday [01:00:27.400 --> 01:00:30.400] he did not regard the war as a mistake. [01:00:30.400 --> 01:00:34.400] Blair spoke on the publication of his memoirs, A Journey. [01:00:34.400 --> 01:00:36.400] Hundreds of thousands of Britons protested against the war [01:00:36.400 --> 01:00:38.400] in London and other cities. [01:00:38.400 --> 01:00:42.400] As the occupation progressed, the conflict became even more unpopular [01:00:42.400 --> 01:00:47.400] with Britain's openly deriding Blair. [01:00:47.400 --> 01:00:49.400] The World Food Programme warned Tuesday [01:00:49.400 --> 01:00:52.400] flood ravaged Pakistan faced a triple threat [01:00:52.400 --> 01:00:55.400] after the worst disaster in the country's history [01:00:55.400 --> 01:00:59.400] has left eight million people dependent on aid to survive. [01:00:59.400 --> 01:01:02.400] WFP Chief Josette Sheeran said, [01:01:02.400 --> 01:01:05.400] people have lost seeds, crops and their incomes, [01:01:05.400 --> 01:01:09.400] leaving them vulnerable to hunger, homelessness and desperation. [01:01:09.400 --> 01:01:15.400] The situation is extremely critical. [01:01:15.400 --> 01:01:19.400] In Iraq, insurgents have dismissed the US administration's announcement [01:01:19.400 --> 01:01:22.400] of a new dawn saying they will fight on [01:01:22.400 --> 01:01:25.400] until the last US soldier has left the country. [01:01:25.400 --> 01:01:29.400] Operation Iraqi Freedom, launched by George Bush seven years ago, [01:01:29.400 --> 01:01:33.400] ended Tuesday with the end of official US combat operations. [01:01:33.400 --> 01:01:37.400] However, Iraqi insurgent groups said it was business as usual. [01:01:37.400 --> 01:01:40.400] A senior official in the Iraqi Ba'ath Party, [01:01:40.400 --> 01:01:43.400] which remains heavily involved in the insurgency, said, [01:01:43.400 --> 01:01:45.400] nothing has changed at all. [01:01:45.400 --> 01:01:48.400] They can say combat is over, but there has been no ceasefire [01:01:48.400 --> 01:01:51.400] from the resistance and there will be no ceasefire [01:01:51.400 --> 01:01:54.400] while there is even a single American soldier in Iraq. [01:01:54.400 --> 01:01:57.400] He said US claims to have ceased offensive military operations [01:01:57.400 --> 01:02:01.400] were quote, a lie, pointing to the continued role [01:02:01.400 --> 01:02:04.400] of US special forces and intelligence units. [01:02:04.400 --> 01:02:08.400] US soldiers also continue to patrol the so-called trigger line territories, [01:02:08.400 --> 01:02:14.400] areas disputed between Iraqi Kurds and Arabs. [01:02:14.400 --> 01:02:18.400] On New York City's Wall Street, more than 100 people representing groups [01:02:18.400 --> 01:02:21.400] from across the country Wednesday called on unemployed people [01:02:21.400 --> 01:02:25.400] to join them for a march on Washington October 2nd. [01:02:25.400 --> 01:02:29.400] The movement One Nation Working Together is demanding jobs, [01:02:29.400 --> 01:02:32.400] justice and education for all Americans. [01:02:32.400 --> 01:02:39.400] Representatives of the NAACP, the AFL-CIO, United for Peace and Justice [01:02:39.400 --> 01:02:43.400] and ANSA Act Now to End War said, [01:02:43.400 --> 01:02:47.400] workers needed to pull together to demand jobs. [01:02:47.400 --> 01:02:51.400] Events are planned across the country for the rest of this week. [01:02:51.400 --> 01:02:55.400] For more information, visit onenationworkingtogether.org. [01:02:55.400 --> 01:03:00.400] This news brief brought to you by the International News Net. [01:03:00.400 --> 01:03:06.400] You are listening to the Rule of Law Radio Network at ruleoflawradio.com. [01:03:06.400 --> 01:03:10.400] Live free speech talk radio at its best. [01:03:10.400 --> 01:03:38.400] Music. [01:03:38.400 --> 01:04:05.400] Okay, this is Randy Kelton. [01:04:05.400 --> 01:04:12.400] This is Randy, Eddie and Deb at the Rule of Law Radio. [01:04:12.400 --> 01:04:19.400] Anthony, what I'm going through is really something that takes a little more time [01:04:19.400 --> 01:04:27.400] than we have today to adequately address this particular issue of how to file motions. [01:04:27.400 --> 01:04:31.400] So tomorrow I will do, first I will do the due process [01:04:31.400 --> 01:04:35.400] so we'll understand what motions to file and when to file them [01:04:35.400 --> 01:04:41.400] and then I'll go into how to file motions and how to construct motions. [01:04:41.400 --> 01:04:45.400] So listen in tomorrow night and it would be nice if you had your parents there [01:04:45.400 --> 01:04:47.400] and they can kind of come up to speed [01:04:47.400 --> 01:04:53.400] because this is the motion aspect that really goes to jurisdiction area. [01:04:53.400 --> 01:04:57.400] So I'll handle as much of that as I can tomorrow night. [01:04:57.400 --> 01:04:59.400] Okay, Anthony. [01:04:59.400 --> 01:05:00.400] Okay. [01:05:00.400 --> 01:05:03.400] We'll go over all this in great detail tomorrow night. [01:05:03.400 --> 01:05:04.400] Okay, good deal. [01:05:04.400 --> 01:05:06.400] All right, we've got a lot of callers on the line. [01:05:06.400 --> 01:05:09.400] We want to thank everyone for being so patient. [01:05:09.400 --> 01:05:10.400] We've got Melissa in Texas. [01:05:10.400 --> 01:05:11.400] Melissa, thanks for calling in. [01:05:11.400 --> 01:05:13.400] What's on your mind tonight? [01:05:13.400 --> 01:05:15.400] Hello? [01:05:15.400 --> 01:05:16.400] Yes, Melissa. [01:05:16.400 --> 01:05:18.400] What's your question for us tonight? [01:05:18.400 --> 01:05:25.400] My question is about two weeks ago I received a call from a law firm here in Austin. [01:05:25.400 --> 01:05:28.400] It's McCrary, McCliff and something or another. [01:05:28.400 --> 01:05:29.400] Okay, hold on one second. [01:05:29.400 --> 01:05:33.400] Melissa, I don't really get a chance to screen the calls when I'm on the air for my own show. [01:05:33.400 --> 01:05:35.400] Are you on a speaker phone? [01:05:35.400 --> 01:05:36.400] Excuse me? [01:05:36.400 --> 01:05:38.400] Are you on a speaker phone right now? [01:05:38.400 --> 01:05:39.400] Yes, I am on my own. [01:05:39.400 --> 01:05:42.400] Okay, yeah, we ask everyone please not to use a speaker phone [01:05:42.400 --> 01:05:46.400] and don't use a Bluetooth either and kind of hold the mouthpiece down by your chin [01:05:46.400 --> 01:05:48.400] so when you breathe you won't breathe into the mic. [01:05:48.400 --> 01:05:49.400] Okay, good. [01:05:49.400 --> 01:05:51.400] Now I've just at least tried to screen all the calls. [01:05:51.400 --> 01:05:53.400] All right, go ahead. [01:05:53.400 --> 01:05:55.400] Yes, I received a phone call from this law firm [01:05:55.400 --> 01:06:00.400] and they said that they're trying to reach me from a different address [01:06:00.400 --> 01:06:02.400] that I haven't lived at for three years, [01:06:02.400 --> 01:06:05.400] but somehow they got my current phone number [01:06:05.400 --> 01:06:11.400] and that I owe $6,000 in unpaid speeding tickets from three different jurisdictions [01:06:11.400 --> 01:06:15.400] and so would I please take care of this on the phone? [01:06:15.400 --> 01:06:21.400] And I said absolutely not and yeah, I was shocked [01:06:21.400 --> 01:06:26.400] and so they said if I didn't then the police were going to be here the next day to arrest me [01:06:26.400 --> 01:06:30.400] and they haven't showed up yet, but yeah, I don't know, yeah. [01:06:30.400 --> 01:06:33.400] Okay, I'm very familiar with this law firm. [01:06:33.400 --> 01:06:41.400] They are a debt collection law firm and they falsify the information that they put out there. [01:06:41.400 --> 01:06:45.400] Now they're representing themselves under some capacity. [01:06:45.400 --> 01:06:48.400] I'm sure Randy can come up with an argument here. [01:06:48.400 --> 01:06:52.400] They're threatening you to extort money from you. [01:06:52.400 --> 01:06:57.400] Yes, I feel very much felt that way, yeah. [01:06:57.400 --> 01:07:03.400] So first thing is you hit them with Mike Mears' information [01:07:03.400 --> 01:07:08.400] because that's all these attorneys at this agency are are debt collectors. [01:07:08.400 --> 01:07:11.400] That's all they are and they will falsify debt. [01:07:11.400 --> 01:07:13.400] I've watched them do it. [01:07:13.400 --> 01:07:15.400] They tried to do it to me. [01:07:15.400 --> 01:07:20.400] If they're calling from a government agency, the Mike Mears' method doesn't apply. [01:07:20.400 --> 01:07:21.400] They're not a government agency. [01:07:21.400 --> 01:07:22.400] Okay, good. [01:07:22.400 --> 01:07:24.400] They're a private debt collection law firm. [01:07:24.400 --> 01:07:28.400] Okay, then you absolutely can use the Mike Mears' method. [01:07:28.400 --> 01:07:32.400] And I said that unpaid tickets are not a debt. [01:07:32.400 --> 01:07:35.400] I would say even paid tickets are not debt. [01:07:35.400 --> 01:07:38.400] I mean they're not debt. [01:07:38.400 --> 01:07:40.400] Is that right? [01:07:40.400 --> 01:07:44.400] That's not necessarily true, but it doesn't matter. [01:07:44.400 --> 01:07:48.400] Those aren't the issues that you deal with with debt collectors. [01:07:48.400 --> 01:07:55.400] The issues that you deal with with debt collectors have to do with the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act [01:07:55.400 --> 01:07:57.400] and the Fair Credit Reporting Act. [01:07:57.400 --> 01:07:59.400] You look and see if they're in your credit report. [01:07:59.400 --> 01:08:02.400] You send a validation letter to the debt collector. [01:08:02.400 --> 01:08:05.400] You send a dispute letter to the original creditor. [01:08:05.400 --> 01:08:11.400] You let them know that they do not have your permission to contact you about this matter over the phone. [01:08:11.400 --> 01:08:14.400] And then you start logging every time they call you after that. [01:08:14.400 --> 01:08:17.400] Every time they call you after that it's $1,000. [01:08:17.400 --> 01:08:19.400] This has nothing to do with the debt. [01:08:19.400 --> 01:08:25.400] You go after them for consumer rights, consumer protections laws violations. [01:08:25.400 --> 01:08:26.400] Okay. [01:08:26.400 --> 01:08:29.400] And so I would highly recommend that you get the Mike Mears' method. [01:08:29.400 --> 01:08:32.400] You can get that off of our website. [01:08:32.400 --> 01:08:37.400] But you never want to argue with them about the debt or whether it's real or whether it's not real or anything like that [01:08:37.400 --> 01:08:39.400] because that doesn't matter. [01:08:39.400 --> 01:08:46.400] It's strictly about debt collection and the laws that they violate when they try to collect a debt. [01:08:46.400 --> 01:08:47.400] Okay. [01:08:47.400 --> 01:08:54.400] By any chance, did the first words out of their mouth, were they, this is an attempt to collect a debt? [01:08:54.400 --> 01:08:55.400] Yes. [01:08:55.400 --> 01:08:57.400] Okay, so they did give you the name Miranda. [01:08:57.400 --> 01:08:59.400] That was the first words out of their mouth? [01:08:59.400 --> 01:09:01.400] I believe so, yes, yes. [01:09:01.400 --> 01:09:03.400] But something to that effect, yes. [01:09:03.400 --> 01:09:06.400] And I said for who, from who? [01:09:06.400 --> 01:09:09.400] And as far as I knew, or as far as I know, I have known. [01:09:09.400 --> 01:09:25.400] And yes, they said it was for unpaid tickets and white settlements, I think the Dallas and no, Hillsboro and Whitney, Texas, yes. [01:09:25.400 --> 01:09:26.400] Okay. [01:09:26.400 --> 01:09:30.400] Are you, to your knowledge, you have no tickets out of those locations? [01:09:30.400 --> 01:09:31.400] Oh, yes, I do. [01:09:31.400 --> 01:09:32.400] Oh. [01:09:32.400 --> 01:09:33.400] Yes, I do. [01:09:33.400 --> 01:09:36.400] And I, my license has been expired since 2004. [01:09:36.400 --> 01:09:37.400] I don't pay my tickets. [01:09:37.400 --> 01:09:42.400] Yes, but that doesn't matter because it has to do with the debt collections practices of these attorneys. [01:09:42.400 --> 01:09:43.400] Right. [01:09:43.400 --> 01:09:51.400] I have pled not, I mean, I haven't pled guilty to any of these things, so I just, yes, I was just, but I was shocked that, you know, [01:09:51.400 --> 01:09:55.400] I didn't get a warrant notice or anything like that. [01:09:55.400 --> 01:09:58.400] Well, they did not get a warrant notice. [01:09:58.400 --> 01:10:05.400] One of them was from 2003, 2005, and 2006. [01:10:05.400 --> 01:10:06.400] That's what she said. [01:10:06.400 --> 01:10:14.400] Well, they're outside the ability to collect them anyway if they've never taken a trial over them, at least as far as that goes. [01:10:14.400 --> 01:10:23.400] But now the thing is, if they've actually issued a warrant for you, if the courts in question have, those warrants will still be sitting out there. [01:10:23.400 --> 01:10:27.400] Now, they will usually not be statewide. [01:10:27.400 --> 01:10:28.400] Okay. [01:10:28.400 --> 01:10:30.400] But they'll still be sitting out there. [01:10:30.400 --> 01:10:32.400] I see. [01:10:32.400 --> 01:10:39.400] And if you ever go through that locale and get stopped again, you very well could go to jail. [01:10:39.400 --> 01:10:47.400] And at which point they're going to have a real problem trying to proceed, but don't bet that they won't. [01:10:47.400 --> 01:10:50.400] Why would they have a problem trying to proceed? [01:10:50.400 --> 01:10:52.400] Because of the statute of limitations. [01:10:52.400 --> 01:10:55.400] If a complaint was never actually filed, they've blown it already. [01:10:55.400 --> 01:10:58.400] They have to file the complaint within two years. [01:10:58.400 --> 01:11:00.400] Oh. [01:11:00.400 --> 01:11:08.400] If the police officer never swore out a complaint, then there will not be an arrest warrant, or at least there shouldn't be, [01:11:08.400 --> 01:11:14.400] unless the magistrate based it strictly on the citation and then their butt's in a ringer. [01:11:14.400 --> 01:11:17.400] Oh, I did not know that. [01:11:17.400 --> 01:11:21.400] I thought that there was not a statute of limitations on people. [01:11:21.400 --> 01:11:26.400] Yeah, there's a two-year statute of limitations on their ability to try the case. [01:11:26.400 --> 01:11:28.400] I see. [01:11:28.400 --> 01:11:30.400] Okay. [01:11:30.400 --> 01:11:31.400] All right. [01:11:31.400 --> 01:11:39.400] Also, I wanted to add, in 2007, I was watching the news in McClinton County, [01:11:39.400 --> 01:11:48.400] and it said that they were dismissing 12,500 Class A and Class B misdemeanor cases that occurred between 2009 and 2006 [01:11:48.400 --> 01:11:53.400] because they had a backlog and they just didn't want to enter them into the records. [01:11:53.400 --> 01:11:54.400] And so guess what? [01:11:54.400 --> 01:11:57.400] Those people are freebie, 12,500. [01:11:57.400 --> 01:12:00.400] And you know what Class A and Class B misdemeanors are? [01:12:00.400 --> 01:12:04.400] But anyone who had a Class C misdemeanor was not going to be so lucky. [01:12:04.400 --> 01:12:06.400] I just thought that was interesting. [01:12:06.400 --> 01:12:07.400] It made me mad. [01:12:07.400 --> 01:12:09.400] It made me very angry. [01:12:09.400 --> 01:12:12.400] Class what was not going to be so lucky? [01:12:12.400 --> 01:12:13.400] Class C. [01:12:13.400 --> 01:12:14.400] Well, yeah. [01:12:14.400 --> 01:12:16.400] A and B doesn't generate revenue. [01:12:16.400 --> 01:12:18.400] Class C does. [01:12:18.400 --> 01:12:19.400] Right, but that was on the news. [01:12:19.400 --> 01:12:23.400] And then a year later, they have billboards up everywhere saying you've been warned, [01:12:23.400 --> 01:12:29.400] there's no place to hide, turn yourself in, or we're coming to get you. [01:12:29.400 --> 01:12:36.400] Class C misdemeanor, you understand the reason for that is a Class C misdemeanor is handled in a different court. [01:12:36.400 --> 01:12:44.400] This was the county court that was dismissing all these cases, not the municipal or justice court. [01:12:44.400 --> 01:12:51.400] But the report was with the Class C misdemeanor because there was too much revenue that had not been collected. [01:12:51.400 --> 01:12:53.400] So those people would not be so lucky. [01:12:53.400 --> 01:12:55.400] That's how the news story went. [01:12:55.400 --> 01:13:04.400] And that's kind of in your face saying basically criminals go free, but we're going after everyone's money. [01:13:04.400 --> 01:13:05.400] You know, I don't know. [01:13:05.400 --> 01:13:09.400] It made me lose faith in the justice system completely. [01:13:09.400 --> 01:13:11.400] Oh, you had some. [01:13:11.400 --> 01:13:13.400] I do have some, yes. [01:13:13.400 --> 01:13:16.400] And I continue to listen to your show for some reason. [01:13:16.400 --> 01:13:18.400] I don't know why. [01:13:18.400 --> 01:13:22.400] But yeah, I just thought that was interesting. [01:13:22.400 --> 01:13:25.400] It just made me, I was seething. [01:13:25.400 --> 01:13:28.400] I'm still angry about that. [01:13:28.400 --> 01:13:33.400] But yeah, because it's just such a money grab. [01:13:33.400 --> 01:13:38.400] I get pulled over for no tail light or my headlights out, and my license is expired, [01:13:38.400 --> 01:13:46.400] and then I get three tickets for that and driving on an invalid license and the speeding or whatever it is. [01:13:46.400 --> 01:13:53.400] You've been listening to us how long, and you still say you're driving on an invalid license? [01:13:53.400 --> 01:14:00.400] Well, well, I haven't had it validated, so I guess, I don't know. [01:14:00.400 --> 01:14:02.400] I guess I don't care. [01:14:02.400 --> 01:14:03.400] I don't know. [01:14:03.400 --> 01:14:05.400] What am I supposed to say? [01:14:05.400 --> 01:14:10.400] Well, the only thing you need to remember is you are living kind of dangerous, okay? [01:14:10.400 --> 01:14:14.400] The last thing in the world you want to be doing is passing through some locale [01:14:14.400 --> 01:14:19.400] and getting arrested 250 miles from home on an old outstanding warrant, [01:14:19.400 --> 01:14:27.400] because then they're going to ensure you return by charging you double the amount of money. [01:14:27.400 --> 01:14:30.400] Yes, that has happened. [01:14:30.400 --> 01:14:33.400] Yes, I have experienced that. [01:14:33.400 --> 01:14:36.400] So just FYI. [01:14:36.400 --> 01:14:38.400] Yes, I understand that. [01:14:38.400 --> 01:14:39.400] It's a big problem. [01:14:39.400 --> 01:14:47.400] I'm slowly going about getting them taken care of a month at a time, and that's what I do. [01:14:47.400 --> 01:14:55.400] But I had not gone through this with this particular law firm before and the way that they went about it, [01:14:55.400 --> 01:15:01.400] so I will look into the Mr. Mears method. [01:15:01.400 --> 01:15:03.400] Absolutely. [01:15:03.400 --> 01:15:07.400] This particular firm is absolutely a bunch of crooks. [01:15:07.400 --> 01:15:09.400] Okay, well, they sound like crooks on the phone. [01:15:09.400 --> 01:15:11.400] Well, thank you. [01:15:11.400 --> 01:15:12.400] All right, thanks, Melissa. [01:15:12.400 --> 01:15:13.400] All right, bye-bye. [01:15:13.400 --> 01:15:14.400] Bye-bye. [01:15:14.400 --> 01:15:21.400] All right, and at this point in time, I'm going to take the opportunity to start plugging some of our sponsors. [01:15:21.400 --> 01:15:26.400] We would really appreciate it here at Rule of Law Radio if you folks would support our sponsors. [01:15:26.400 --> 01:15:32.400] We've got Capital Coin and Bullion here in Austin, Texas. [01:15:32.400 --> 01:15:38.400] So please support Capital Coin and Bullion, 646-6440 is their phone number. [01:15:38.400 --> 01:15:42.400] You can mail order from them also, Precious Coins and Metals. [01:15:42.400 --> 01:15:48.400] Folks out there who haven't bought jurisdictionary yet, please purchase the jurisdictionary package. [01:15:48.400 --> 01:15:55.400] We'll teach you how to be a pro se litigant in a civil case, how to defend yourself against lawsuits, how to file lawsuits. [01:15:55.400 --> 01:15:59.400] These are things you need to understand even for criminal cases as well. [01:15:59.400 --> 01:16:03.400] So you can click on the banner here on ruleoflawradio.com. [01:16:03.400 --> 01:16:09.400] You scroll a little ways down and you'll see the banner, how to file a lawsuit, how to win without an attorney. [01:16:09.400 --> 01:16:14.400] Also the Mike Mears method of how to deal with debt collectors and creditors. [01:16:14.400 --> 01:16:21.400] That's the baby blue banner immediately to the left of the jurisdictionary banner. [01:16:21.400 --> 01:16:26.400] So we appreciate that folks would support our sponsors. [01:16:26.400 --> 01:16:29.400] Really do appreciate it, Brave New Books as well. [01:16:29.400 --> 01:16:33.400] Your support keeps us on the air. [01:16:33.400 --> 01:16:35.400] We do need your donations as well. [01:16:35.400 --> 01:16:43.400] You can get more information on that by clicking the donations button here on ruleoflawradio.com. [01:16:43.400 --> 01:16:46.400] When we get back, we'll be taking your calls. [01:16:46.400 --> 01:16:51.400] Tomorrow, Carolyn in Texas, Brian from Minnesota, Marshall from Oregon, and more. [01:16:51.400 --> 01:17:02.400] We'll be right back. [01:17:02.400 --> 01:17:09.400] Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals, and coin supplies in the Austin metro area. [01:17:09.400 --> 01:17:11.400] We also ship worldwide. [01:17:11.400 --> 01:17:17.400] We are a family-owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin and metals purchases. [01:17:17.400 --> 01:17:24.400] We buy, sell, trade, and consign rare coins, gold and silver coin collections, precious metals, and scrap gold. [01:17:24.400 --> 01:17:28.400] We will purchase and sell gold and jewelry items as well. [01:17:28.400 --> 01:17:30.400] We offer daily specials on coins and bullions. [01:17:30.400 --> 01:17:40.400] We're located at 5448 Barnett Road, Suite 3, and we're open Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturdays, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. [01:17:40.400 --> 01:17:49.400] You are welcome to stop in our shop during regular business hours or call 512-646-6440 with any questions. [01:17:49.400 --> 01:17:54.400] Ask for Chad and say you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or 90.1 FM. [01:17:54.400 --> 01:18:01.400] That's Capital Coin and Bullion, 512-646-6440. [01:18:01.400 --> 01:18:21.400] All right, folks, we are back. [01:18:21.400 --> 01:18:29.400] And of course, don't forget the Rule of Law Radio traffic seminar, of course. [01:18:29.400 --> 01:18:36.400] You can purchase the audio and the documents from Eddie Craig's and Rule of Law Radio's traffic seminar. [01:18:36.400 --> 01:18:40.400] That does go a long way to support this network and this show. [01:18:40.400 --> 01:18:44.400] We do depend on you, the listeners, to support our sponsors. [01:18:44.400 --> 01:18:52.400] We do depend on you, the listeners, to buy jurisdictionary, to get the Might, Mirrors method, to get the traffic seminar, and to support our sponsors. [01:18:52.400 --> 01:18:56.400] We do depend on your donations to keep us on the air. [01:18:56.400 --> 01:19:00.400] It's not free to run a radio show like this. [01:19:00.400 --> 01:19:01.400] It costs equipment. [01:19:01.400 --> 01:19:02.400] There's bandwidth. [01:19:02.400 --> 01:19:03.400] There's telephone usage. [01:19:03.400 --> 01:19:05.400] It goes on and on. [01:19:05.400 --> 01:19:18.400] Of course, our time as well is involved because we have to run the shows and put effort into the content and learn the material that we can present to you guys. [01:19:18.400 --> 01:19:24.400] Okay, we are continuing on to your calls. [01:19:24.400 --> 01:19:27.400] And Randy, do you have the caller page up? [01:19:27.400 --> 01:19:30.400] My caller page has frozen temporarily. [01:19:30.400 --> 01:19:32.400] Mine's frozen as well. [01:19:32.400 --> 01:19:35.400] I was just trying to refresh and get it to come up. [01:19:35.400 --> 01:19:36.400] Okay. [01:19:36.400 --> 01:19:38.400] Eddie, do you have the caller page up? [01:19:38.400 --> 01:19:40.400] No, I don't. [01:19:40.400 --> 01:19:41.400] You want me to get it up? [01:19:41.400 --> 01:19:44.400] Yes, if you could, please. [01:19:44.400 --> 01:19:53.400] All right, folks, if you just hang on one moment so that we can get your calls up. [01:19:53.400 --> 01:20:04.400] We seem to have a minor Internet issue here because mine clicks out on a regular basis. [01:20:04.400 --> 01:20:06.400] We need to get more bandwidth here, folks. [01:20:06.400 --> 01:20:08.400] That's some upgrades that we need to make. [01:20:08.400 --> 01:20:13.400] So, again, we rely on your donations and your support. [01:20:13.400 --> 01:20:19.400] Yes, and above all, think Randy's Beer Fund. [01:20:19.400 --> 01:20:21.400] Randy's Forever Beer Fund. [01:20:21.400 --> 01:20:25.400] It's got $1.10 in it. [01:20:25.400 --> 01:20:28.400] Somebody gave me a dollar. [01:20:28.400 --> 01:20:30.400] I'm going to frame it. [01:20:30.400 --> 01:20:32.400] Okay, we're going now to Carolyn in Texas. [01:20:32.400 --> 01:20:33.400] Carolyn, thanks for calling in. [01:20:33.400 --> 01:20:35.400] What's on your mind tonight? [01:20:35.400 --> 01:20:36.400] Hi, can you hear me? [01:20:36.400 --> 01:20:38.400] Yes. [01:20:38.400 --> 01:20:40.400] Randy, you know who I am, obviously. [01:20:40.400 --> 01:20:42.400] I have a quick question for you. [01:20:42.400 --> 01:20:50.400] When I answered that joint discovery case management in my lawsuit rule 26F, [01:20:50.400 --> 01:20:56.400] the other side filed their answers and they are pressuring me to sign theirs [01:20:56.400 --> 01:20:58.400] because it's a joint discovery. [01:20:58.400 --> 01:21:02.400] And I told them I wasn't comfortable doing that and I had several issues with their answers. [01:21:02.400 --> 01:21:07.400] Okay, what we're talking about here is when you file a federal lawsuit, [01:21:07.400 --> 01:21:13.400] one of the first things the courts want you to do is confer with the other side [01:21:13.400 --> 01:21:17.400] and come up with a case management plan. [01:21:17.400 --> 01:21:23.400] How long do you want to take to name interested parties? [01:21:23.400 --> 01:21:27.400] A lot of times when you file a suit, you don't know who all the interested parties are. [01:21:27.400 --> 01:21:28.400] Right. [01:21:28.400 --> 01:21:31.400] And how long do you think it will take for discovery? [01:21:31.400 --> 01:21:34.400] There's a number of issues. [01:21:34.400 --> 01:21:41.400] And generally, in your case, have you looked at the case management plan [01:21:41.400 --> 01:21:46.400] the other side sent you? [01:21:46.400 --> 01:21:50.400] I don't think I got it. [01:21:50.400 --> 01:21:56.400] It's kind of hard for them to ask you to sign something that you haven't seen. [01:21:56.400 --> 01:22:00.400] Oh, yeah, I've got theirs right here in front of me and I've got mine [01:22:00.400 --> 01:22:03.400] and I've got some real issues with some of their answers. [01:22:03.400 --> 01:22:06.400] Okay, just let them know what the issues you have is. [01:22:06.400 --> 01:22:12.400] You know, this was a conference you were supposed to have at least 21 days [01:22:12.400 --> 01:22:18.400] before the case management hearing to kind of iron these out. [01:22:18.400 --> 01:22:28.400] Generally, the attorneys that operate in a venue will be aware of what the venue requires, [01:22:28.400 --> 01:22:31.400] what the courts want to see. [01:22:31.400 --> 01:22:36.400] So I would very much like to see that document so we can see how the courts... [01:22:36.400 --> 01:22:38.400] When did you sign your e-mail? [01:22:38.400 --> 01:22:40.400] I sent it to you. [01:22:40.400 --> 01:22:45.400] Well, I get probably $500 a day, so I probably didn't get to it yet. [01:22:45.400 --> 01:22:47.400] But I will look at that. [01:22:47.400 --> 01:22:54.400] And if it's not unreasonable, it's really just...this is nothing here is carved in stone. [01:22:54.400 --> 01:22:56.400] There's no time restraints on it. [01:22:56.400 --> 01:22:57.400] They're unreasonable. [01:22:57.400 --> 01:23:01.400] Like I've got to have interrogeries or whatever answered by, you know, [01:23:01.400 --> 01:23:06.400] done by September 31st or something, whatever ungodly day. [01:23:06.400 --> 01:23:09.400] Oh, that's easy. [01:23:09.400 --> 01:23:13.400] They do that because they don't have a problem. [01:23:13.400 --> 01:23:14.400] You send them interrogatories. [01:23:14.400 --> 01:23:16.400] They'll say deny, deny, deny, deny, deny. [01:23:16.400 --> 01:23:18.400] They can do that in about five minutes. [01:23:18.400 --> 01:23:21.400] They've already done that on their answer. [01:23:21.400 --> 01:23:23.400] So, you know, the answer is not interrogatory. [01:23:23.400 --> 01:23:24.400] You can't... [01:23:24.400 --> 01:23:25.400] No. [01:23:25.400 --> 01:23:26.400] Okay. [01:23:26.400 --> 01:23:27.400] Just be careful juxtaposing. [01:23:27.400 --> 01:23:29.400] And they just deny everything. [01:23:29.400 --> 01:23:30.400] Okay. [01:23:30.400 --> 01:23:31.400] That's standard procedure. [01:23:31.400 --> 01:23:32.400] Okay. [01:23:32.400 --> 01:23:34.400] So they'll send you interrogatories. [01:23:34.400 --> 01:23:37.400] Interrogatories are just questions they're asking. [01:23:37.400 --> 01:23:45.400] And excuse me, and you'll object to every one of them. [01:23:45.400 --> 01:23:46.400] Okay. [01:23:46.400 --> 01:23:50.400] And they'll send you stuff and you object to theirs. [01:23:50.400 --> 01:23:51.400] You'll send them stuff. [01:23:51.400 --> 01:23:52.400] They'll object to yours. [01:23:52.400 --> 01:23:56.400] And then you have to go to court and get them to compel. [01:23:56.400 --> 01:23:58.400] So that won't be difficult. [01:23:58.400 --> 01:23:59.400] One other thing. [01:23:59.400 --> 01:24:04.400] I have turned up some information on, I don't know if I'm pronouncing it right, [01:24:04.400 --> 01:24:07.400] MERS, M-E-R-S, MERS. [01:24:07.400 --> 01:24:08.400] MERS. [01:24:08.400 --> 01:24:09.400] MERS. [01:24:09.400 --> 01:24:10.400] Yeah. [01:24:10.400 --> 01:24:14.400] And I think they should be somehow or other brought into this suit because my note was [01:24:14.400 --> 01:24:16.400] obviously assigned to them. [01:24:16.400 --> 01:24:19.400] And there's a bunch of law cases that relate to them. [01:24:19.400 --> 01:24:20.400] Yes. [01:24:20.400 --> 01:24:21.400] We're well aware of those. [01:24:21.400 --> 01:24:23.400] Well, I didn't put them in any of my papers. [01:24:23.400 --> 01:24:26.400] Of course you didn't put them in any of yours because we didn't get to those yet. [01:24:26.400 --> 01:24:27.400] Right. [01:24:27.400 --> 01:24:29.400] We asked for the Rule 12. [01:24:29.400 --> 01:24:34.400] And once we have the Rule 12, we tried to draw the Rule 12 motion. [01:24:34.400 --> 01:24:35.400] Uh-huh. [01:24:35.400 --> 01:24:39.400] Did we get a motion in your case to dismiss for failure to state a claim of which recovery [01:24:39.400 --> 01:24:42.400] could be had? [01:24:42.400 --> 01:24:44.400] No. [01:24:44.400 --> 01:24:45.400] Darn. [01:24:45.400 --> 01:24:46.400] We're supposed to get that one. [01:24:46.400 --> 01:24:47.400] Okay. [01:24:47.400 --> 01:24:48.400] No. [01:24:48.400 --> 01:24:55.400] Then in that case, we will at one point file an amended pleading. [01:24:55.400 --> 01:24:56.400] Okay. [01:24:56.400 --> 01:25:01.400] And in the amended pleading, we raise all the issues we didn't raise in the first one. [01:25:01.400 --> 01:25:02.400] Okay. [01:25:02.400 --> 01:25:04.400] Don't you think that MERS thing is real important? [01:25:04.400 --> 01:25:05.400] Yes. [01:25:05.400 --> 01:25:08.400] I think the MERS thing is real important, but this is the wrong show to go into all of [01:25:08.400 --> 01:25:09.400] the... [01:25:09.400 --> 01:25:10.400] Okay. [01:25:10.400 --> 01:25:11.400] That's all right. [01:25:11.400 --> 01:25:12.400] I just wanted you to know I became aware of it. [01:25:12.400 --> 01:25:13.400] Yeah. [01:25:13.400 --> 01:25:14.400] We were very well aware of MERS. [01:25:14.400 --> 01:25:20.400] MERS is getting...if anybody has a mortgage out there and the lender has filed it with [01:25:20.400 --> 01:25:23.400] Mortgage Electronic Registration Service. [01:25:23.400 --> 01:25:24.400] Yep. [01:25:24.400 --> 01:25:27.400] Good chance you can get your mortgage trashed. [01:25:27.400 --> 01:25:31.400] Well, that's what they did, and I have the document. [01:25:31.400 --> 01:25:32.400] Yes. [01:25:32.400 --> 01:25:33.400] We're aware of that. [01:25:33.400 --> 01:25:38.400] We're very well aware of MERS, and there are a lot of other issues that were mentioned [01:25:38.400 --> 01:25:48.400] in the lawsuit but weren't made as...they were made as notice pleadings rather than a [01:25:48.400 --> 01:25:50.400] completely adjudicated pleading. [01:25:50.400 --> 01:25:55.400] And we plan to do that in the amended pleading. [01:25:55.400 --> 01:26:00.400] We give them all the details we didn't in the first one, but it's a little too...this [01:26:00.400 --> 01:26:04.400] is the wrong thing to go in here because I have to explain to everybody the strategy [01:26:04.400 --> 01:26:05.400] behind that. [01:26:05.400 --> 01:26:06.400] Okay. [01:26:06.400 --> 01:26:10.400] I just wanted you to know I found the document where they did that, where they assigned my [01:26:10.400 --> 01:26:11.400] notes. [01:26:11.400 --> 01:26:12.400] Oh, okay. [01:26:12.400 --> 01:26:13.400] Wonderful. [01:26:13.400 --> 01:26:14.400] Good. [01:26:14.400 --> 01:26:17.400] And then I have a hearing, joint hearing in front of the judge. [01:26:17.400 --> 01:26:18.400] Okay. [01:26:18.400 --> 01:26:19.400] Wait. [01:26:19.400 --> 01:26:20.400] Carolyn, wait a minute. [01:26:20.400 --> 01:26:21.400] These aren't questions. [01:26:21.400 --> 01:26:22.400] Let's do this off the air. [01:26:22.400 --> 01:26:23.400] Okay. [01:26:23.400 --> 01:26:24.400] Call me then. [01:26:24.400 --> 01:26:25.400] Okay. [01:26:25.400 --> 01:26:26.400] I'll try to reach you. [01:26:26.400 --> 01:26:27.400] Okay. [01:26:27.400 --> 01:26:28.400] Okay, yeah. [01:26:28.400 --> 01:26:31.400] Just so folks know, this is not Randy's personal phone number. [01:26:31.400 --> 01:26:32.400] This is a radio show. [01:26:32.400 --> 01:26:36.400] This is the rule of law radio show on the rule of law radio network. [01:26:36.400 --> 01:26:39.400] We're going out on about 20 a.m. and FM stations. [01:26:39.400 --> 01:26:42.400] So apparently over the last couple of months, I don't know what's been going on, but there's [01:26:42.400 --> 01:26:43.400] been a lot of confusion lately. [01:26:43.400 --> 01:26:47.400] People have been calling this number thinking that it's Randy's cell phone or something. [01:26:47.400 --> 01:26:51.400] So, Randy, I don't know what's happening if you're giving out the wrong number or what. [01:26:51.400 --> 01:26:53.400] No, I'm calling the right numbers. [01:26:53.400 --> 01:26:54.400] Okay. [01:26:54.400 --> 01:26:55.400] All right. [01:26:55.400 --> 01:26:56.400] Very good. [01:26:56.400 --> 01:26:59.400] Just to let folks know, this is the rule of law radio network show. [01:26:59.400 --> 01:27:00.400] So, all right. [01:27:00.400 --> 01:27:01.400] Thank you very much. [01:27:01.400 --> 01:27:05.400] We are going to go now to Brian from Minnesota. [01:27:05.400 --> 01:27:07.400] Brian, thanks for calling in. [01:27:07.400 --> 01:27:09.400] What's on your mind tonight? [01:27:09.400 --> 01:27:10.400] Hello, Deborah. [01:27:10.400 --> 01:27:14.400] Randy and Eddie, I was just, I'm calling back. [01:27:14.400 --> 01:27:20.400] I suppose I'm getting, I just purchased jurisdiction today, so I got that on the way. [01:27:20.400 --> 01:27:25.400] I'm kind of excited to do that and learn some more processes and things. [01:27:25.400 --> 01:27:31.400] I don't know if you're familiar with my, what I was talking about before or not, but I'm [01:27:31.400 --> 01:27:34.400] dealing with an illegal search and seizure case. [01:27:34.400 --> 01:27:40.400] I suppose as far as questions tonight, I have two things I was kind of looking for strategy [01:27:40.400 --> 01:27:41.400] for. [01:27:41.400 --> 01:27:46.400] One might be strategy on just an illegal search and seizure case. [01:27:46.400 --> 01:27:49.400] And then also, I'm kind of curious about what's a good strategy. [01:27:49.400 --> 01:27:56.400] I've heard you talk a lot about Miranda, the Miranda v. the United States court case a [01:27:56.400 --> 01:27:57.400] lot. [01:27:57.400 --> 01:28:01.400] I was wondering what's probably the best way or strategy to handle that in court, too, [01:28:01.400 --> 01:28:03.400] because I would imagine that's what they're going to use. [01:28:03.400 --> 01:28:04.400] Okay. [01:28:04.400 --> 01:28:05.400] Wait a minute. [01:28:05.400 --> 01:28:06.400] Wait a minute. [01:28:06.400 --> 01:28:10.400] We have no idea what you're talking about. [01:28:10.400 --> 01:28:11.400] Miranda? [01:28:11.400 --> 01:28:14.400] In what context Miranda? [01:28:14.400 --> 01:28:19.400] Isn't there a court case, isn't that the court case, referring to like anything you [01:28:19.400 --> 01:28:22.400] say can and will be used against you in a court of law? [01:28:22.400 --> 01:28:23.400] Yes, it is. [01:28:23.400 --> 01:28:30.400] But Miranda only is effective if they questioned you without giving, reading you your rights [01:28:30.400 --> 01:28:36.400] and then attempt to bring the information they secured based on that questioning into [01:28:36.400 --> 01:28:38.400] court to use against you. [01:28:38.400 --> 01:28:44.400] If they question you without reading you your rights, but don't develop any information [01:28:44.400 --> 01:28:49.400] they subsequently try to bring into court, then Miranda doesn't matter. [01:28:49.400 --> 01:28:50.400] Okay. [01:28:50.400 --> 01:28:52.400] Well, he questioned me. [01:28:52.400 --> 01:28:57.400] His whole reason, I suppose my angle with this is going to be he just kept saying I [01:28:57.400 --> 01:29:02.400] was acting suspicious, and that was his reason for searching for his, his reason for his [01:29:02.400 --> 01:29:05.400] search was that I was being suspicious. [01:29:05.400 --> 01:29:09.400] And then he was drawing a lot of conclusions like he said my hands were dirty and cuts [01:29:09.400 --> 01:29:14.400] in my hands without any supporting evidence saying that that was the thing was I just [01:29:14.400 --> 01:29:16.400] got done helping out. [01:29:16.400 --> 01:29:18.400] Somebody was having trouble with a car on the side of the road. [01:29:18.400 --> 01:29:19.400] Wait a minute. [01:29:19.400 --> 01:29:24.400] What crime did he think you committed that you had dirty cut hands for? [01:29:24.400 --> 01:29:29.400] He like and that's one of the charges I want to bring against him is coercion because he [01:29:29.400 --> 01:29:32.400] said he's like when he started questioning me. [01:29:32.400 --> 01:29:33.400] Okay, wait, we're about to. [01:29:33.400 --> 01:29:38.400] He thought that he thought that Brian had stolen a car because his fingernails were [01:29:38.400 --> 01:29:40.400] dirty is ridiculous. [01:29:40.400 --> 01:29:41.400] Yeah. [01:29:41.400 --> 01:29:42.400] Okay. [01:29:42.400 --> 01:29:43.400] Okay. [01:29:43.400 --> 01:29:44.400] Let's go back to this on the other side. [01:29:44.400 --> 01:29:45.400] Okay. [01:29:45.400 --> 01:29:51.400] This is Randy Deborah Eddie rule of law radio. [01:29:51.400 --> 01:29:54.400] We'll be right back. [01:29:54.400 --> 01:30:00.400] It's a crime to have dirty fingernails now. [01:30:00.400 --> 01:30:04.400] Christ fed the multitude with only one loaf of bread. [01:30:04.400 --> 01:30:06.400] Poor people, there's something for you. [01:30:06.400 --> 01:30:12.400] Austin's Own Caribbean, One Love Kitchen on the banks of Colorado River at 3109 East [01:30:12.400 --> 01:30:14.400] First Street is where you find One Love Kitchen. [01:30:14.400 --> 01:30:20.400] Jerk chicken, vegetarian restaurant Monday through Wednesday, lunch and dinner, $5.00. [01:30:20.400 --> 01:30:25.400] Friday and Saturday we got late night with Emperor Sound Crew, still $5.00 place. [01:30:25.400 --> 01:30:29.400] Jerk chicken and vegetarian place to beat One Love Kitchen, Austin, Texas. [01:30:29.400 --> 01:30:35.400] Have you ever fed your family cornflakes or sent your kid off to school with a juice box? [01:30:35.400 --> 01:30:36.400] If so, look out. [01:30:36.400 --> 01:30:39.400] You might be sending them off to a lifetime of health problems. [01:30:39.400 --> 01:30:43.400] I'm Dr. Catherine Albrecht and I'll identify the culprit in just a moment. [01:30:43.400 --> 01:30:48.400] Google is watching you, recording everything you've ever searched for and creating a massive [01:30:48.400 --> 01:30:50.400] database of your personal information. [01:30:50.400 --> 01:30:51.400] That's creepy. [01:30:51.400 --> 01:30:53.400] But it doesn't have to be that way. [01:30:53.400 --> 01:30:56.400] Startpage.com is the world's most private search engine. [01:30:56.400 --> 01:31:01.400] Startpage.com doesn't store your IP address, make a record of your searches or use tracking [01:31:01.400 --> 01:31:03.400] cookies and they're third party certified. [01:31:03.400 --> 01:31:07.400] If you don't like big brother spying on you, start over with Startpage. [01:31:07.400 --> 01:31:10.400] Great search results and total privacy. [01:31:10.400 --> 01:31:13.400] Startpage.com, the world's most private search engine. [01:31:13.400 --> 01:31:18.400] Many breakfast cereals, juice drinks and other products contain high fructose corn syrup. [01:31:18.400 --> 01:31:21.400] Well, it's no secret that too much sugar will expand your waistline. [01:31:21.400 --> 01:31:25.400] When that sweetener is in the form of high fructose corn syrup, you put your body at risk [01:31:25.400 --> 01:31:26.400] for disease. [01:31:26.400 --> 01:31:31.400] We're talking high blood pressure, obesity, especially in children, high cholesterol and [01:31:31.400 --> 01:31:35.400] insulin resistance that can lead to type 2 diabetes and that's just part of it. [01:31:35.400 --> 01:31:39.400] Food manufacturers have to list their ingredients on all packaging and fortunately many are [01:31:39.400 --> 01:31:41.400] now providing alternatives. [01:31:41.400 --> 01:31:45.400] So the next time you reach for the cookies, ketchup or barbecue sauce, check the label. [01:31:45.400 --> 01:31:48.400] The life you save may be your child's. [01:31:48.400 --> 01:31:49.400] This is Dr. Catherine Albrecht. [01:31:49.400 --> 01:32:02.400] More news and information at CatherineAlbrecht.com. [01:32:02.400 --> 01:32:30.400] Thank you very much. [01:32:32.400 --> 01:32:59.400] Okay, folks, we are back. [01:32:59.400 --> 01:33:05.400] We're speaking with Brian in Minnesota. [01:33:05.400 --> 01:33:08.400] Okay, go ahead, Brian. [01:33:08.400 --> 01:33:09.400] Yeah. [01:33:09.400 --> 01:33:16.400] So I guess that's the real issue with the case was when they started, you know, I wanted [01:33:16.400 --> 01:33:23.400] to file, since I had last talked to you, I went and I kind of had drawn up some, I drew [01:33:23.400 --> 01:33:29.400] up the criminal complaint and then also I went and filed the motion that Randy had suggested [01:33:29.400 --> 01:33:32.400] was a motion withdrawal to get it out of conciliation court. [01:33:32.400 --> 01:33:39.400] So my next, I suppose, questions in the matter I have now are concerning, like, and I suppose [01:33:39.400 --> 01:33:44.400] jurisdiction, jurisdiction answer lots of this for me, but what would be next as far [01:33:44.400 --> 01:33:46.400] as the criminal charges go? [01:33:46.400 --> 01:33:50.400] I'm supposed to bring, Randy said last time I need to bring up the criminal charges. [01:33:50.400 --> 01:33:56.400] I'm supposed to bring, Randy said last time I need to bring those to the DA, and I think [01:33:56.400 --> 01:33:57.400] I'm prepared to do that. [01:33:57.400 --> 01:34:01.400] My only question on the criminal complaint is they had what I'm not supposed to fill [01:34:01.400 --> 01:34:02.400] out. [01:34:02.400 --> 01:34:05.400] I used the state download form and they have a lot of stuff in here. [01:34:05.400 --> 01:34:06.400] I know I'm not supposed to use that. [01:34:06.400 --> 01:34:10.400] I kind of copied off that so I don't put all the, I put the criminal charges on separate [01:34:10.400 --> 01:34:16.400] forms and then also, but they have stuff in the, they have extra sheets here that, you [01:34:16.400 --> 01:34:22.400] know, say, do I issue a warrant or a summons and things like, things of that nature. [01:34:22.400 --> 01:34:25.400] I don't know if I need to fill that out or not. [01:34:25.400 --> 01:34:27.400] Well, you don't issue the warrant or the summons. [01:34:27.400 --> 01:34:28.400] The court would do that. [01:34:28.400 --> 01:34:30.400] Right. [01:34:30.400 --> 01:34:31.400] Okay. [01:34:31.400 --> 01:34:36.400] So I just have, it just has to be filled out with a statement of probable cause and then [01:34:36.400 --> 01:34:37.400] down, right? [01:34:37.400 --> 01:34:42.400] Yes, and take it to a notary and sign it before a notary. [01:34:42.400 --> 01:34:43.400] Okay. [01:34:43.400 --> 01:34:47.400] And then when the prosecutor refuses to act on it, then you make up complaints against [01:34:47.400 --> 01:34:50.400] the prosecutor. [01:34:50.400 --> 01:34:55.400] So I want to take this to the city attorney, which who is in charge of prosecuting the [01:34:55.400 --> 01:34:56.400] case as of now? [01:34:56.400 --> 01:34:57.400] No, no. [01:34:57.400 --> 01:34:59.400] I would take it to the district attorney. [01:34:59.400 --> 01:35:00.400] Oh, okay. [01:35:00.400 --> 01:35:01.400] The district attorney. [01:35:01.400 --> 01:35:04.400] And then when the district attorney refuses to act, which he absolutely most certainly [01:35:04.400 --> 01:35:10.400] will, then you take it to a district judge. [01:35:10.400 --> 01:35:11.400] Okay. [01:35:11.400 --> 01:35:15.400] So he'll refuse to act, then you take it to the grand jury, and that's what will start [01:35:15.400 --> 01:35:18.400] putting pressure back on these guys. [01:35:18.400 --> 01:35:25.400] It asks for the defendant's address and then his city and age and all kinds of stuff. [01:35:25.400 --> 01:35:26.400] Do I have to get that information? [01:35:26.400 --> 01:35:27.400] No. [01:35:27.400 --> 01:35:29.400] You just put the officer's name. [01:35:29.400 --> 01:35:32.400] If you have his badge number, then that's sufficient. [01:35:32.400 --> 01:35:33.400] Okay. [01:35:33.400 --> 01:35:39.400] Well, I guess concerning Miranda again, one of the things that never happened, it says [01:35:39.400 --> 01:35:44.400] here in the report that they handcuffed me and put me in the car for everyone's safety [01:35:44.400 --> 01:35:45.400] or whatever. [01:35:45.400 --> 01:35:50.400] But the thing is, I started asking the officer, I said, what narcotics? [01:35:50.400 --> 01:35:52.400] What proof of narcotics do you have on me? [01:35:52.400 --> 01:35:53.400] And he says, shut up. [01:35:53.400 --> 01:35:54.400] I'm not answering anything. [01:35:54.400 --> 01:35:55.400] I haven't Mirandized you yet. [01:35:55.400 --> 01:35:59.400] Now, through this whole 45-minute ordeal, he puts me in the back of the car and never [01:35:59.400 --> 01:36:02.400] once read me any Miranda rights. [01:36:02.400 --> 01:36:07.400] I mean, they ended up letting me go with nothing, but I don't know if that's a process violation [01:36:07.400 --> 01:36:08.400] there. [01:36:08.400 --> 01:36:10.400] I mean, isn't that technically an arrest? [01:36:10.400 --> 01:36:13.400] That is very technically an arrest. [01:36:13.400 --> 01:36:14.400] Okay. [01:36:14.400 --> 01:36:18.400] You know, they can claim whatever reason they did it for they want to, but that doesn't [01:36:18.400 --> 01:36:21.400] make an arrest less an arrest. [01:36:21.400 --> 01:36:31.400] If they'd say, well, I shot him 12 times for my own safety, that doesn't make it okay. [01:36:31.400 --> 01:36:34.400] So that could be an issue, too, that they never Mirandized me. [01:36:34.400 --> 01:36:40.400] No, they didn't charge you with anything, so Miranda never comes into play. [01:36:40.400 --> 01:36:41.400] Okay. [01:36:41.400 --> 01:36:49.400] So what would be a good strategy with these tough judges up here to handle illegal search [01:36:49.400 --> 01:36:51.400] and seizure? [01:36:51.400 --> 01:36:57.400] You've got a cause of action for false imprisonment. [01:36:57.400 --> 01:37:02.400] A good way to handle it is to file suit. [01:37:02.400 --> 01:37:03.400] Right. [01:37:03.400 --> 01:37:04.400] Civil. [01:37:04.400 --> 01:37:05.400] Civil suit. [01:37:05.400 --> 01:37:06.400] Okay. [01:37:06.400 --> 01:37:14.400] And in this case, at least in Texas and most certainly, most likely Minnesota as well, [01:37:14.400 --> 01:37:19.400] the state waives its sovereign immunity in the case of false imprisonment. [01:37:19.400 --> 01:37:23.400] But Jimmy, you only have one year, so how long has it been? [01:37:23.400 --> 01:37:28.400] It was April, so I need to get these civil charges in order quick. [01:37:28.400 --> 01:37:32.400] Yes, you need to send them a tort letter. [01:37:32.400 --> 01:37:33.400] Okay. [01:37:33.400 --> 01:37:38.400] Just send them a letter, notice them you've been harmed, notice them of an amount, [01:37:38.400 --> 01:37:47.400] and you need to look at some cases of false imprisonment to see what the juries have awarded. [01:37:47.400 --> 01:37:52.400] You can probably just go on the Internet and do some searches for false imprisonment [01:37:52.400 --> 01:38:00.400] Minnesota and look at some of the adjudications and use that kind of as a basis of how much [01:38:00.400 --> 01:38:10.400] to claim against the officers and tell the, if it's a municipality, send it to the mayor. [01:38:10.400 --> 01:38:15.400] If it's a county, send it to the county commissioners and tell them you've been harmed [01:38:15.400 --> 01:38:19.400] and this amount, make me wholly be sued. [01:38:19.400 --> 01:38:23.400] They need to get that generally 60 days before you can file suit. [01:38:23.400 --> 01:38:24.400] Oh, really? [01:38:24.400 --> 01:38:25.400] Yeah. [01:38:25.400 --> 01:38:28.400] That perfects your right. [01:38:28.400 --> 01:38:31.400] That exhausts your administrative remedies. [01:38:31.400 --> 01:38:34.400] Would that be the tort claim that I'd send him? [01:38:34.400 --> 01:38:37.400] That'd be the tort claim. [01:38:37.400 --> 01:38:38.400] Okay. [01:38:38.400 --> 01:38:45.400] Is that a good substitute for the state-provided civil claim forms? [01:38:45.400 --> 01:38:47.400] Yes. [01:38:47.400 --> 01:38:51.400] As a matter of fact, the civil claim form would do it. [01:38:51.400 --> 01:38:54.400] That would give them notice. [01:38:54.400 --> 01:38:59.400] If they have a form already, then you fill out their form and send it to them. [01:38:59.400 --> 01:39:00.400] They can't object to it. [01:39:00.400 --> 01:39:02.400] They've had notice. [01:39:02.400 --> 01:39:05.400] Okay. [01:39:05.400 --> 01:39:09.400] So I'm going to show up for the, because I had it in conciliation court. [01:39:09.400 --> 01:39:13.400] Randy, I talked to him recently and he explained that I needed to make a withdrawal [01:39:13.400 --> 01:39:15.400] and give it out of the small claims court. [01:39:15.400 --> 01:39:19.400] I would imagine I should still show up in case they show up. [01:39:19.400 --> 01:39:21.400] Absolutely. [01:39:21.400 --> 01:39:29.400] And then review that I filled out the form for that, the motion to withdraw. [01:39:29.400 --> 01:39:36.400] Notice the conciliation court that the claim you made exceeds the jurisdiction of this court. [01:39:36.400 --> 01:39:37.400] Okay. [01:39:37.400 --> 01:39:41.400] And then I kind of even went to, I went to explain that in my motion even. [01:39:41.400 --> 01:39:47.400] And so I should be able to just hand him criminal complaints right there. [01:39:47.400 --> 01:39:49.400] What is he? [01:39:49.400 --> 01:39:50.400] Huh? [01:39:50.400 --> 01:39:54.400] What is the person who sits in the head of the conciliation court? [01:39:54.400 --> 01:39:56.400] A referee. [01:39:56.400 --> 01:39:58.400] Okay, then he won't be a magistrate. [01:39:58.400 --> 01:40:01.400] He won't get the criminal complaints. [01:40:01.400 --> 01:40:03.400] But I can hand him that for reasoning. [01:40:03.400 --> 01:40:04.400] You don't need to give him reason. [01:40:04.400 --> 01:40:12.400] Once you notice him that you're making a claim that exceeds the dollar jurisdiction, [01:40:12.400 --> 01:40:17.400] the dollar amount of his jurisdiction, he can't do anything anyway. [01:40:17.400 --> 01:40:19.400] Okay. [01:40:19.400 --> 01:40:26.400] And as far as the criminal aspect side of it goes, you know, let's just say hypothetically [01:40:26.400 --> 01:40:33.400] they accept the criminal complaints. [01:40:33.400 --> 01:40:37.400] And then it goes, it would just go into, they would process it. [01:40:37.400 --> 01:40:41.400] And they would pick the, I would imagine they pick a... [01:40:41.400 --> 01:40:42.400] Yeah, they pick up the ball. [01:40:42.400 --> 01:40:45.400] You would have nothing to do with that. [01:40:45.400 --> 01:40:47.400] I would be a witness or something, wouldn't I? [01:40:47.400 --> 01:40:48.400] Exactly. [01:40:48.400 --> 01:40:50.400] You would only be a witness if you're called. [01:40:50.400 --> 01:40:56.400] When you file criminal complaints, it's the prosecution who handles the case. [01:40:56.400 --> 01:41:01.400] You have no more involvement other than if you're called as a witness. [01:41:01.400 --> 01:41:04.400] I would imagine I would want to keep tabs on this. [01:41:04.400 --> 01:41:08.400] So if for the civil case purposes, I would imagine though, right? [01:41:08.400 --> 01:41:10.400] Yes, absolutely. [01:41:10.400 --> 01:41:11.400] Okay. [01:41:11.400 --> 01:41:13.400] And is there a length of time? [01:41:13.400 --> 01:41:16.400] Does it usually take them a long time to get around to criminal charges? [01:41:16.400 --> 01:41:17.400] Oh, yeah. [01:41:17.400 --> 01:41:22.400] And you can, we always know exactly how long it's going to take them, forever. [01:41:22.400 --> 01:41:24.400] Yeah, yeah. [01:41:24.400 --> 01:41:26.400] They never will. [01:41:26.400 --> 01:41:28.400] So give them a reasonable amount of time. [01:41:28.400 --> 01:41:32.400] Generally, if you hammer the prosecutor, he'll tell you, [01:41:32.400 --> 01:41:34.400] I'm not going to prosecute these. [01:41:34.400 --> 01:41:36.400] That's what you need. [01:41:36.400 --> 01:41:41.400] Then you go after the prosecutor for obstruction of justice. [01:41:41.400 --> 01:41:46.400] You file that with a district judge and he'll refuse to take it. [01:41:46.400 --> 01:41:52.400] I suggest you don't do what I do and go in and hammer the judge in person, [01:41:52.400 --> 01:41:56.400] but just send it to him, certified mail. [01:41:56.400 --> 01:41:57.400] To the judge? [01:41:57.400 --> 01:41:59.400] Yeah, to the judge. [01:41:59.400 --> 01:42:00.400] Okay. [01:42:00.400 --> 01:42:02.400] So you're talking the Randy Kelton method here. [01:42:02.400 --> 01:42:03.400] Exactly. [01:42:03.400 --> 01:42:08.400] Set the judge up so that you can go to the grand jury with complaints against the judge. [01:42:08.400 --> 01:42:15.400] And the judge is essentially an innocent party, so he's going to scream the loudest. [01:42:15.400 --> 01:42:21.400] And when the district judge starts getting upset, everybody gets upset. [01:42:21.400 --> 01:42:27.400] I wanted to bring, there were two kind of different sections of charges I was going to bring, [01:42:27.400 --> 01:42:30.400] because I was going to bring charges against the officer, [01:42:30.400 --> 01:42:37.400] but then also charges against the people responsible for the officer being the police department. [01:42:37.400 --> 01:42:41.400] Would I want to wait for them to find him guilty of... [01:42:41.400 --> 01:42:46.400] No, no, no, you can name the department in the Monell sense, [01:42:46.400 --> 01:42:55.400] in that the officer was acting in accordance with established policy. [01:42:55.400 --> 01:43:03.400] And under Monell, everybody will recognize that case. [01:43:03.400 --> 01:43:09.400] If an employee is acting in compliance with city policy [01:43:09.400 --> 01:43:16.400] and he creates a tort, the city is liable for his actions. [01:43:16.400 --> 01:43:18.400] So you can sue the department. [01:43:18.400 --> 01:43:24.400] They're going to construe a suit against the officer as a suit against the department anyway. [01:43:24.400 --> 01:43:26.400] I don't have to worry about that, really. [01:43:26.400 --> 01:43:28.400] No, you don't have to worry about that. [01:43:28.400 --> 01:43:30.400] It'll all just happen. [01:43:30.400 --> 01:43:32.400] Yes, okay. [01:43:32.400 --> 01:43:34.400] We've got a bunch of callers. [01:43:34.400 --> 01:43:38.400] This is Randy Kelton, Eddie Craig, Debra Stevens. [01:43:38.400 --> 01:43:40.400] I got it right that time. [01:43:40.400 --> 01:43:41.400] We will all radio. [01:43:41.400 --> 01:43:47.400] When we get back, we're going to move to Marshall, in Oregon. [01:43:47.400 --> 01:43:49.400] Thank you guys for waiting. [01:43:49.400 --> 01:43:51.400] We'll try to get to all of you during the next segment. [01:43:51.400 --> 01:43:54.400] It's the last segment, so we'll move rather quickly. [01:43:54.400 --> 01:44:06.400] We'll be right back. [01:44:06.400 --> 01:44:14.400] Aerial spraying, chemtrails, the modified atmosphere, heavy metals and pesticides, [01:44:14.400 --> 01:44:18.400] carcinogens and chemical fibers all falling from the sky. [01:44:18.400 --> 01:44:21.400] You have a choice to keep your body clean. [01:44:21.400 --> 01:44:31.400] Detoxify with micro plant powder from musa.org or call 908-691-2608. [01:44:31.400 --> 01:44:36.400] It's odorless and tasteless and used in any liquid or food. [01:44:36.400 --> 01:44:40.400] Protect your family now with micro plant powder. [01:44:40.400 --> 01:44:44.400] Cleaning out heavy metals, parasites and toxins. [01:44:44.400 --> 01:44:49.400] Order it now for daily intake and stock it now for long-term storage. [01:44:49.400 --> 01:45:18.400] Visit hempusa.org or call 908-691-2608 today. [01:45:18.400 --> 01:45:19.400] Okay, we're back. [01:45:19.400 --> 01:45:22.400] We are going to Marshall, in Oregon. [01:45:22.400 --> 01:45:23.400] Marshall, thanks for calling in. [01:45:23.400 --> 01:45:27.400] What is your question for us tonight? [01:45:27.400 --> 01:45:28.400] All right. [01:45:28.400 --> 01:45:32.400] Now, the traffic code generally, if not in full, only applies to those in commerce. [01:45:32.400 --> 01:45:35.400] Is that right? [01:45:35.400 --> 01:45:41.400] In the state of Texas, as far as I know, yes. [01:45:41.400 --> 01:45:50.400] So, if you can, in a brief way, define commerce, how is commerce defined? [01:45:50.400 --> 01:45:54.400] In terms of traffic code issues or, you know, if it applies to you or not. [01:45:54.400 --> 01:46:05.400] You are either transporting persons or property for hire or compensation. [01:46:05.400 --> 01:46:11.400] Well, let's say I have a yard trimming, grooming business and it's just myself. [01:46:11.400 --> 01:46:13.400] I don't have any employees or what have you. [01:46:13.400 --> 01:46:16.400] But I've got a truck and odds and ends and my gear and everything else. [01:46:16.400 --> 01:46:18.400] And it's a business. [01:46:18.400 --> 01:46:26.400] Okay, the question is, are you paid to transport something to the job site [01:46:26.400 --> 01:46:28.400] and away from the job site? [01:46:28.400 --> 01:46:30.400] Are you on the clock? [01:46:30.400 --> 01:46:35.400] A portion of my payment is to haul debris from somebody's property, for example. [01:46:35.400 --> 01:46:36.400] Okay. [01:46:36.400 --> 01:46:37.400] Ah, good. [01:46:37.400 --> 01:46:38.400] That's a good question. [01:46:38.400 --> 01:46:41.400] Yes, see, that's different because otherwise, if you're just like, [01:46:41.400 --> 01:46:44.400] if it's your lawnmower, et cetera, and your equipment, [01:46:44.400 --> 01:46:50.400] you technically are not engaged in commerce until you get to your destination. [01:46:50.400 --> 01:46:54.400] But if you're being paid to transport, like say, limbs and debris [01:46:54.400 --> 01:46:58.400] or trash somewhere else, then that technically could be commerce. [01:46:58.400 --> 01:47:00.400] No, no, no, that's not going to fall under. [01:47:00.400 --> 01:47:03.400] You're providing a service. [01:47:03.400 --> 01:47:09.400] You're being paid to do the job on the property. [01:47:09.400 --> 01:47:15.400] Once you load up all the property, all the limbs and debris on your truck [01:47:15.400 --> 01:47:19.400] and leave the property, you're not being paid anymore. [01:47:19.400 --> 01:47:25.400] If it's five miles or 100 miles to the dump, it makes no difference to you. [01:47:25.400 --> 01:47:29.400] Yes, so that doesn't really matter then. [01:47:29.400 --> 01:47:32.400] And I was just trying to use that as an example. [01:47:32.400 --> 01:47:37.400] What I'm trying to do or clarify is don't I, as an individual, [01:47:37.400 --> 01:47:42.400] whether I'm in business or not, with maybe some exceptions that you could help me clarify, [01:47:42.400 --> 01:47:47.400] also have the right to do business without having to have a license? [01:47:47.400 --> 01:47:48.400] Absolutely. [01:47:48.400 --> 01:47:53.400] Yes, it really depends upon whether or not the business you're involved in [01:47:53.400 --> 01:47:56.400] affects the public health and safety. [01:47:56.400 --> 01:47:58.400] The ones that affect the public health and safety, [01:47:58.400 --> 01:48:02.400] the state has the authority to regulate and require licensing [01:48:02.400 --> 01:48:09.400] and require certifications to prove competency to perform the acts involved in that business [01:48:09.400 --> 01:48:13.400] so that the public health and safety is protected. [01:48:13.400 --> 01:48:17.400] If it's left up to them to define public health and safety, doesn't that basically, [01:48:17.400 --> 01:48:21.400] and don't we see that where they kind of define it as almost anything? [01:48:21.400 --> 01:48:24.400] Well, that's what they're getting to, yes, [01:48:24.400 --> 01:48:27.400] but that's where we have to step in and say, oh, no, you don't. [01:48:27.400 --> 01:48:31.400] Well, and I have, this brings up another question too, Eddie, [01:48:31.400 --> 01:48:36.400] concerning the right to do business on the roadways. [01:48:36.400 --> 01:48:41.400] I mean, we obviously have a, that's what I was just, that's exactly where I was going to. [01:48:41.400 --> 01:48:45.400] We have a right to travel on the public thoroughfare, [01:48:45.400 --> 01:48:50.400] but if the public thoroughfare is truly owned by the public, [01:48:50.400 --> 01:48:53.400] then that means my tax dollars go to pay for it, [01:48:53.400 --> 01:49:01.400] and I'm sorry, but you don't have a right to profit off of the roads that I pay taxes for. [01:49:01.400 --> 01:49:03.400] You have the right to travel on the roads, [01:49:03.400 --> 01:49:10.400] but you don't have the right to make a profit and do business on that roadway that I'm paying tax dollars for. [01:49:10.400 --> 01:49:15.400] So no, you fundamentally do not have a right to do business on the roads. [01:49:15.400 --> 01:49:19.400] Yeah, the thing here is the way the courts have determined this, [01:49:19.400 --> 01:49:23.400] and I agree with their interpretation of this through the years, [01:49:23.400 --> 01:49:29.400] that the main purpose and use of the roads is for the benefit of the public, [01:49:29.400 --> 01:49:35.400] for their own personal business and pleasure to travel from point A to point B. [01:49:35.400 --> 01:49:38.400] The use of the roads as a place of business, however, [01:49:38.400 --> 01:49:43.400] has always been ruled to be an extraordinary use. [01:49:43.400 --> 01:49:47.400] That type of occupation upon the road puts additional wear and tear, [01:49:47.400 --> 01:49:54.400] and in some instances excessive wear and tear compared to the normal use. [01:49:54.400 --> 01:49:59.400] That's the way the courts have looked at it since these laws have existed. [01:49:59.400 --> 01:50:02.400] The normal force of use is for the public. [01:50:02.400 --> 01:50:06.400] The extraordinary use is for anybody using them as a place of business. [01:50:06.400 --> 01:50:10.400] One is done as a matter of right, the public use, [01:50:10.400 --> 01:50:16.400] and one is done as a matter of privilege, the business use. [01:50:16.400 --> 01:50:20.400] And any privilege can be regulated. [01:50:20.400 --> 01:50:23.400] It can be removed. [01:50:23.400 --> 01:50:28.400] Right, that's why privilege versus right in this case. [01:50:28.400 --> 01:50:32.400] Say, for example, then I have a computer consultancy business, [01:50:32.400 --> 01:50:38.400] and I use a vehicle to go to businesses, residences, or whomever. [01:50:38.400 --> 01:50:40.400] The same rules would apply. [01:50:40.400 --> 01:50:45.400] The business is conducted at the location, not upon the road. [01:50:45.400 --> 01:50:47.400] Understand. [01:50:47.400 --> 01:50:52.400] Right, you have to actually be transporting passengers or goods [01:50:52.400 --> 01:50:59.400] or other property from point A to point B for hire or compensation [01:50:59.400 --> 01:51:03.400] in order for it technically to be considered doing business on the roads. [01:51:03.400 --> 01:51:10.400] Like say even, for example, a farmer who's taking his produce to the farmer's market. [01:51:10.400 --> 01:51:14.400] That does not count as doing business on the roadway [01:51:14.400 --> 01:51:19.400] because he does not engage in commerce until he gets to the farmer's market. [01:51:19.400 --> 01:51:23.400] That's when he does his selling and buying. [01:51:23.400 --> 01:51:28.400] Doing business on the roadways is like say a taxi cab driver [01:51:28.400 --> 01:51:31.400] transporting a passenger from point A to point B, [01:51:31.400 --> 01:51:35.400] or like an 18-wheeler driver who's carrying, [01:51:35.400 --> 01:51:40.400] transporting a load from point A to point B for hire. [01:51:40.400 --> 01:51:45.400] But going to work is not doing business on the roadway. [01:51:45.400 --> 01:51:54.400] So it really is a pretty narrow venue of tasks or what have you [01:51:54.400 --> 01:52:00.400] that would apply then to this commerce which would require the license. [01:52:00.400 --> 01:52:02.400] Transporting passengers or, yeah, [01:52:02.400 --> 01:52:09.400] transporting property or passengers from point A to point B for compensation. [01:52:09.400 --> 01:52:14.400] That's the only, that's the definition of doing business on the road. [01:52:14.400 --> 01:52:16.400] Okay, so just again trying to help clarify. [01:52:16.400 --> 01:52:20.400] I think I'm getting it now, but if I say a home builder [01:52:20.400 --> 01:52:30.400] and I'm transporting materials from wherever I buy them to the location to be built, [01:52:30.400 --> 01:52:33.400] I'm not doing business over the roadway though, right? [01:52:33.400 --> 01:52:41.400] Not unless somebody pays you to bring the building materials from point A to point B. [01:52:41.400 --> 01:52:44.400] But if somebody just pays you to build the building, [01:52:44.400 --> 01:52:48.400] then no, you're not doing business on the road. [01:52:48.400 --> 01:52:52.400] Now, the exception to that would be if you're incorporating. [01:52:52.400 --> 01:52:57.400] Then you are acting on the commercial benefit of the legal entity [01:52:57.400 --> 01:53:06.400] and the transportation of that property would then be commerce [01:53:06.400 --> 01:53:12.400] because you are acting for the financial benefit and gain of another party. [01:53:12.400 --> 01:53:18.400] Well, if I'm operating in any kind of legal fiction, then that may apply. [01:53:18.400 --> 01:53:19.400] Correct. [01:53:19.400 --> 01:53:25.400] No, that's stuff about legal fiction and about you being a corporation [01:53:25.400 --> 01:53:28.400] because your name is in all caps. [01:53:28.400 --> 01:53:30.400] No, no, no. [01:53:30.400 --> 01:53:34.400] Eddie's talking about if you work for a corporation. [01:53:34.400 --> 01:53:38.400] For instance, if you work for a corporation like the companies that go around [01:53:38.400 --> 01:53:44.400] and build the modular houses, if you're doing what you're doing for their benefit, [01:53:44.400 --> 01:53:50.400] then you are engaging in commerce when you transport materials to and from a job site. [01:53:50.400 --> 01:53:52.400] There's no question of that. [01:53:52.400 --> 01:53:56.400] But if you are a private unincorporated home builder [01:53:56.400 --> 01:54:02.400] and you're buying the materials yourself and then taking them to the job site to put them in, [01:54:02.400 --> 01:54:10.400] you are not engaging in commerce during the transport of that property because it's your property. [01:54:10.400 --> 01:54:13.400] Well, I would expect that most home builders, [01:54:13.400 --> 01:54:16.400] even if they don't have employees, are probably incorporated. [01:54:16.400 --> 01:54:18.400] Maybe I'm wrong, but maybe that's a reason they shouldn't be [01:54:18.400 --> 01:54:21.400] or at least one reason why they should not incorporate. [01:54:21.400 --> 01:54:23.400] We need to look at that. [01:54:23.400 --> 01:54:24.400] I'm not sure, Eddie. [01:54:24.400 --> 01:54:27.400] Do you have something on that? [01:54:27.400 --> 01:54:33.400] Because the corporation becomes essentially a person. [01:54:33.400 --> 01:54:39.400] And if the corporation is not being paid for the transport... [01:54:39.400 --> 01:54:42.400] The corporation is always operating in commerce, though, Randy. [01:54:42.400 --> 01:54:44.400] That's the only reason it can exist. [01:54:44.400 --> 01:54:48.400] By law, the corporation is engaging in commerce from its inception. [01:54:48.400 --> 01:54:56.400] You're juxtaposing issues. So is a person who is providing a service, [01:54:56.400 --> 01:54:59.400] but he's not operating in commerce on the highway. [01:54:59.400 --> 01:55:07.400] Yeah, but there's a difference, Randy, because say he's a private home builder, a private contractor. [01:55:07.400 --> 01:55:14.400] The person who hired him to build the home is not necessarily paying him to transport the goods [01:55:14.400 --> 01:55:18.400] from the Home Depot or wherever to the job site. [01:55:18.400 --> 01:55:22.400] He's just paying that person to build the house. [01:55:22.400 --> 01:55:28.400] But however, if there's a corporate entity like Home Builders USA, [01:55:28.400 --> 01:55:34.400] just make something up, who has hired somebody to do this and that, [01:55:34.400 --> 01:55:40.400] and that person is being paid by the corporation to go to the Home Depot [01:55:40.400 --> 01:55:43.400] and pick up stuff and then bring it somewhere, [01:55:43.400 --> 01:55:48.400] then technically that would be engaging in commerce on the road [01:55:48.400 --> 01:55:53.400] because he's being paid to transport goods from point A to point B. [01:55:53.400 --> 01:56:03.400] If a trucking company is hired to haul product and the trucking company is a corporation, [01:56:03.400 --> 01:56:09.400] when they move their truck from their location to the location where they pick up the product, [01:56:09.400 --> 01:56:15.400] they're not in commerce. When they drop off the product at the location [01:56:15.400 --> 01:56:20.400] and drive the truck home empty, they're not in commerce because that's cost, [01:56:20.400 --> 01:56:27.400] they're not being paid for that time when the corporation who's building the building... [01:56:27.400 --> 01:56:29.400] You're crossing two things here though, Randy. [01:56:29.400 --> 01:56:34.400] No, you're trying to apply something that's inappropriate when the corporation... [01:56:34.400 --> 01:56:41.400] The law is very specific... I've never seen anything like that. [01:56:41.400 --> 01:56:48.400] Commerce went to making profit, doing something for profit. [01:56:48.400 --> 01:56:57.400] Hauling the material from the source to the location is a cost to the corporation. [01:56:57.400 --> 01:57:00.400] The only thing they're getting paid for is building the building. [01:57:00.400 --> 01:57:03.400] They're not getting paid for hauling that to the location. [01:57:03.400 --> 01:57:10.400] They're having to take that out of their own pocket to do that. That's a cost. [01:57:10.400 --> 01:57:18.400] Now, if they were charged the lender extra for transporting it from point A to point B, [01:57:18.400 --> 01:57:21.400] yeah, they'd be in commerce because then they're transporting for hire, [01:57:21.400 --> 01:57:24.400] but they're not transporting for hire over the highways. [01:57:24.400 --> 01:57:30.400] It's a necessary evil. It's a cost. It's just like the farmer who raises his crop. [01:57:30.400 --> 01:57:36.400] He has to get the crop from the field to the point of sale. That's not in commerce. [01:57:36.400 --> 01:57:42.400] But what you're talking about here is two separate types of beings. [01:57:42.400 --> 01:57:47.400] You have one whose entire existence is based upon legal privileges. [01:57:47.400 --> 01:57:54.400] Everything it does is a privilege. There is no right involved in a corporation. [01:57:54.400 --> 01:58:01.400] It exists as a creature of law, and it is guided and bound entirely by law. [01:58:01.400 --> 01:58:07.400] A private person is an individual. A human being doing the same thing is not. [01:58:07.400 --> 01:58:13.400] They have a certain right to do certain things when they're not engaging in that act. [01:58:13.400 --> 01:58:15.400] A corporation cannot make that claim. [01:58:15.400 --> 01:58:17.400] Okay, get your boxing gloves. I want to fight over this one. [01:58:17.400 --> 01:58:22.400] Okay. Well, what about the driver who works for the building company? [01:58:22.400 --> 01:58:26.400] He's getting paid to bring the goods from one place to the other. [01:58:26.400 --> 01:58:29.400] He is acting on behalf of the legal entity who is profiting. [01:58:29.400 --> 01:58:32.400] They are charging for his time. [01:58:32.400 --> 01:58:35.400] No matter what he's doing, they are billing the client for that time. [01:58:35.400 --> 01:58:39.400] They are getting paid, expense or otherwise. They're still getting paid. [01:58:39.400 --> 01:58:43.400] So that guy still is conducting business on the roadways. [01:58:43.400 --> 01:58:44.400] Yes, he is. [01:58:44.400 --> 01:58:46.400] No, he ain't. I disagree. [01:58:46.400 --> 01:58:51.400] Okay, all right. We're going to have to talk about this tomorrow. [01:58:51.400 --> 01:58:53.400] After the due process show. [01:58:53.400 --> 01:58:56.400] Tomorrow night, Randy and I are going to go over, and Eddie and I, [01:58:56.400 --> 01:59:22.400] all three of us are going to go over due process. [01:59:26.400 --> 01:59:30.400] I'm like a step in the grave. [01:59:30.400 --> 01:59:35.400] I'm dangerous, I'm dangerous. [01:59:35.400 --> 01:59:37.400] I'm like a step in the grave. [01:59:37.400 --> 01:59:42.400] I'm dangerous, I'm dangerous. [01:59:42.400 --> 01:59:57.400] I'm dangerous.