[00:00.000 --> 00:04.440]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[00:04.440 --> 00:10.520]  Iranian lawmaker Zoray El Ahian says Tehran plans to file a lawsuit against the US over
[00:10.520 --> 00:15.040]  the inhumane policies adopted by Washington towards the people of Iran.
[00:15.040 --> 00:20.120]  El Ahian said the US violates human rights in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq.
[00:20.120 --> 00:25.560]  Two US drone attacks have left at least eight people dead in Pakistan's northwestern tribal
[00:25.560 --> 00:28.920]  region amid growing discontent over the issue.
[00:28.920 --> 00:33.160]  US drones have targeted the region several times over the past two days.
[00:33.160 --> 00:38.280]  About a thousand people, mostly civilians, have been killed over the past two years.
[00:38.280 --> 00:43.660]  A former US Department of Homeland Security agent was sentenced Friday to four and a half
[00:43.660 --> 00:49.280]  years in prison after coercing a female applicant to perform oral sex in exchange for her green
[00:49.280 --> 00:50.280]  card.
[00:50.280 --> 00:55.220]  The screening officer, Isaac Baku of the Bronx, told the woman if she failed to comply he
[00:55.220 --> 00:59.280]  would deny her application.
[00:59.280 --> 01:03.840]  Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, says more NATO troops will die
[01:03.840 --> 01:07.400]  in Afghanistan as violence mounts over the summer.
[01:07.400 --> 01:12.840]  Mullen's remarks came as the Taliban said they were holding captive one of two US servicemen
[01:12.840 --> 01:17.000]  who strayed into insurgent territory and that the other had been killed.
[01:17.000 --> 01:21.800]  It also comes less than a week since a major international conference in Kabul agreed
[01:21.800 --> 01:27.080]  the Afghan government should take responsibility for security by 2014.
[01:27.080 --> 01:32.360]  Mullen said there would be more violent incidents to come but the US military was doing everything
[01:32.360 --> 01:35.920]  possible to find the two missing Navy servicemen.
[01:35.920 --> 01:40.560]  The Afghan government said Sunday it was checking reports from villagers that civilians had
[01:40.560 --> 01:46.160]  been killed in a raid by foreign forces in Sangin, Helmand Province, Friday.
[01:46.160 --> 01:51.160]  Such incidents had triggered outrage among the population against international troops
[01:51.160 --> 01:57.400]  whose mission is to protect them.
[01:57.400 --> 02:02.520]  So far this year 11 people have died in house fires in Detroit where the utilities were
[02:02.520 --> 02:03.800]  turned off.
[02:03.800 --> 02:08.720]  Recent figures show Michigan's two primary gas and electricity companies, DT Energy and
[02:08.720 --> 02:15.800]  Consumers Energy, shot off over 160,000 households gas or electricity between January and May
[02:15.800 --> 02:17.540]  this year.
[02:17.540 --> 02:23.760]  Michigan has the second highest unemployment rate in the US at 13.2% while Detroit has
[02:23.760 --> 02:29.800]  a real unemployment level of nearly 50% when underemployed and part-time workers are factored
[02:29.800 --> 02:30.800]  in.
[02:30.800 --> 02:36.080]  The primary cause of utility shutoffs is the inability of workers to pay high energy bills.
[02:36.080 --> 02:41.600]  Michigan utility companies have been granted huge hikes in rates to consumers offsetting
[02:41.600 --> 02:43.580]  their loss of industrial business.
[02:43.580 --> 02:48.240]  In addition, most of Detroit's housing stock is not weatherized, leading to many bills
[02:48.240 --> 03:15.320]  of $500 a month and more.
[03:18.740 --> 03:19.240]  What!
[03:23.240 --> 03:24.240]  Bad Boy!
[03:24.240 --> 03:25.240]  What you want?
[03:25.240 --> 03:26.240]  What you want?
[03:26.240 --> 03:28.240]  What are you going to do?
[03:28.240 --> 03:34.240]  When the mission is so good for you?
[03:34.240 --> 03:37.240]  What you want to do?
[03:37.240 --> 03:39.240]  What you going to do?
[03:40.240 --> 03:41.240]  Yeah!
[03:42.240 --> 03:45.240]  Bad Boy, Bad Boy, what you going to do?
[03:45.240 --> 03:47.240]  What you going to do when they come for you?
[03:47.240 --> 03:50.240]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do?
[03:50.240 --> 03:53.240]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[03:53.240 --> 03:56.240]  When you work and you have bad traits
[03:56.240 --> 03:58.240]  You go to school and learn the golden rule
[03:58.240 --> 04:01.240]  So why are you acting like a bloody fool?
[04:01.240 --> 04:04.240]  If you get high and you must get cool
[04:04.240 --> 04:07.240]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do?
[04:07.240 --> 04:09.240]  Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?
[04:09.240 --> 04:12.240]  Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do?
[04:12.240 --> 04:13.240]  Whatcha gonna do?
[04:13.240 --> 04:15.240]  Alright folks, good evening
[04:15.240 --> 04:18.240]  This is Rule of Law Radio, Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens
[04:18.240 --> 04:20.240]  Randy Kelton is off tonight
[04:20.240 --> 04:22.240]  He has a lot of seminar work going on
[04:22.240 --> 04:26.240]  It is Monday night, which is our traffic discussion night
[04:26.240 --> 04:29.240]  Tonight I would like to start off with presenting you with some information
[04:29.240 --> 04:33.240]  that I was going through today out of the local government code
[04:33.240 --> 04:34.240]  for here in Texas
[04:34.240 --> 04:40.240]  This is section 87, which is removal of county officers from office
[04:40.240 --> 04:42.240]  and filling of vacancies
[04:42.240 --> 04:47.240]  Now when you're reading down through this, you're going to find some interesting things here
[04:47.240 --> 04:51.240]  Mainly it's got a list of who can be removed
[04:51.240 --> 04:55.240]  and the fact that they can be removed by a district judge
[04:55.240 --> 04:59.240]  There is nothing in this section, however, for removing a district judge
[04:59.240 --> 05:03.240]  which I find kind of odd, considering that at least in my district
[05:03.240 --> 05:07.240]  some of the biggest criminals here are the district judges
[05:07.240 --> 05:11.240]  and the least knowledgeable in the law are the district judges
[05:11.240 --> 05:19.240]  But the part that I wanted to go over real quick is how this occurs
[05:19.240 --> 05:22.240]  I want to read you a couple of the sections out of this
[05:22.240 --> 05:30.240]  Section 87.015, petition for removal, subsection A
[05:30.240 --> 05:36.240]  A proceeding for the removal of an officer is begun by filing a written petition for removal
[05:36.240 --> 05:40.240]  in a district court of the county in which the officer resides
[05:40.240 --> 05:42.240]  meaning the officer that you want removed
[05:42.240 --> 05:46.240]  However, a proceeding for the removal of a district attorney
[05:46.240 --> 05:50.240]  is begun by filing a written petition in a district court of
[05:50.240 --> 05:53.240]  one, the county in which the attorney resides
[05:53.240 --> 05:57.240]  or two, the county where the alleged cause of removal occurred
[05:57.240 --> 06:01.240]  if that county is in the county attorney's judicial district
[06:01.240 --> 06:08.240]  Subsection B, any resident of this state who has lived for at least six months
[06:08.240 --> 06:11.240]  in the county in which the petition is to be filed
[06:11.240 --> 06:14.240]  and who is not currently under indictment in the county
[06:14.240 --> 06:16.240]  may file the petition
[06:16.240 --> 06:19.240]  Now I'm going to break right there for just a second
[06:19.240 --> 06:22.240]  In Nacogdoches County, you go to a district judge
[06:22.240 --> 06:27.240]  and ask them to file a court document for any reason
[06:27.240 --> 06:31.240]  and they'll threaten you with the unlicensed practice of law
[06:31.240 --> 06:37.240]  They did that to someone that I sent to file a habeas corpus for her son
[06:37.240 --> 06:42.240]  The judge threatened her with the unlicensed practice of law
[06:42.240 --> 06:49.240]  when the law very specifically states that anyone can file a habeas corpus
[06:49.240 --> 06:55.240]  So, and not one district judge did it, but both district judges did it
[06:55.240 --> 07:00.240]  Both of them threatened her because she was not a licensed attorney
[07:00.240 --> 07:07.240]  So if that's not proof positive these gentlemen do not know the law, there it is
[07:07.240 --> 07:12.240]  Okay, now, let me continue on here
[07:12.240 --> 07:17.240]  The rest of Subsection B, at least one of the parties who files the petition
[07:17.240 --> 07:20.240]  must swear to it at or before the filing
[07:20.240 --> 07:27.240]  Subsection C, the petition must be addressed to the district judge of the court in which it is filed
[07:27.240 --> 07:33.240]  The petition must set forth the grounds alleged for the removal of the officer in plain and intelligible language
[07:33.240 --> 07:38.240]  and must cite the time and place of the occurrence of each act alleged as a ground for removal
[07:38.240 --> 07:42.240]  with as much certainty as the nature of the case permits
[07:42.240 --> 07:47.240]  Section 87.016, Citation of Officer
[07:47.240 --> 07:51.240]  Subsection A, after a petition for removal is filed
[07:51.240 --> 07:56.240]  the person filing the petition shall apply to the district judge in writing for an order
[07:56.240 --> 08:02.240]  requiring a citation and a certified copy of the petition to be served on the officer
[08:02.240 --> 08:08.240]  Subsection B, if the application for the order is made during the term of the court
[08:08.240 --> 08:13.240]  action may not be taken on the petition until the order is granted and entered in the minutes of the court
[08:13.240 --> 08:17.240]  If the application is made to the judge during the vacation of the court
[08:17.240 --> 08:20.240]  the judge shall indicate on the petition the action taken
[08:20.240 --> 08:24.240]  and shall have the action entered in the minutes of the court at the next term
[08:24.240 --> 08:30.240]  Subsection C, if the judge refuses to issue the order for citation
[08:30.240 --> 08:36.240]  the petition shall be dismissed at the cost of the person filing the petition
[08:36.240 --> 08:41.240]  The person may not take an appeal or writ of error from the judge's decision
[08:41.240 --> 08:47.240]  If the judge grants the order for citation, the clerk shall issue the citation with a certified copy of the petition
[08:47.240 --> 08:54.240]  The judge shall require the person filing the petition to pose security for costs in the manner provided for other cases
[08:54.240 --> 09:01.240]  Subsection D, the citation shall order the officer to appear and answer the petition on a date fixed by the judge
[09:01.240 --> 09:05.240]  after the fifth day after the date the citation is served
[09:05.240 --> 09:08.240]  The term is computed as it is in other suits
[09:08.240 --> 09:16.240]  Now, one more section here, 87.017, Suspension Pending Trial Temporary Appointee
[09:16.240 --> 09:22.240]  Subsection A, after the issuance of the order requiring citation of the officer
[09:22.240 --> 09:28.240]  the district judge may temporarily suspend the officer and may appoint another person to perform the duties of the office
[09:28.240 --> 09:36.240]  Subsection B, the judge may not suspend the officer until the person appointed to serve executes a bond
[09:36.240 --> 09:44.240]  with at least two good and sufficient sureties in an amount fixed by the judge and conditioned as required by the judge
[09:44.240 --> 09:53.240]  The bond shall be used to pay damages and costs to the suspended officer if the grounds for removal are found at trial to be insufficient or untrue
[09:53.240 --> 10:00.240]  In an action to recover on the bond, it is necessary to allege and prove that the temporary appointee actively aided
[10:00.240 --> 10:04.240]  and instigated the filing and prosecution of the removal action
[10:04.240 --> 10:10.240]  The suspended officer must also serve written notice on the temporary appointee and the appointee's bondsman
[10:10.240 --> 10:17.240]  within 90 days after the date the bond is executed, stating that the officer intends to hold them liable on the bond
[10:17.240 --> 10:19.240]  and stating the grounds for that liability
[10:19.240 --> 10:26.240]  If the final judgment establishes the officer's right to the office, the county shall pay the officer from the general fund of the county
[10:26.240 --> 10:30.240]  an amount equal to the compensation received by the temporary appointee
[10:30.240 --> 10:44.240]  Okay, my biggest problem here so far is 87.016. Subsection C, if the judge refuses to issue the order for citation
[10:44.240 --> 10:48.240]  the petition shall be dismissed at the cost of the person filing the petition
[10:48.240 --> 10:57.240]  Now, I don't know about you, but I have absolutely no faith that a judge is going to act against another public servant
[10:57.240 --> 11:00.240]  no matter what they've done
[11:00.240 --> 11:09.240]  So I can almost guarantee you that out of hand a judge is going to refuse the order for citation
[11:09.240 --> 11:18.240]  I know in this county they will because I've had first-hand experience with these judges refusing to abide by the law
[11:18.240 --> 11:24.240]  When I had the issues going on with the comptroller's office, I went down and filed an emergency injunction
[11:24.240 --> 11:32.240]  The judge insisted he had no jurisdiction because all tax collection matters must be taken through the court in Travis County
[11:32.240 --> 11:41.240]  What the judge failed to understand or take any notice of whatsoever is that the law is very specific
[11:41.240 --> 11:51.240]  Chapter 111 of the tax code specifically states that a collection action is initiated by the filing of a suit by the attorney general
[11:51.240 --> 11:57.240]  Well, there was no suit filed by the attorney general in my case
[11:57.240 --> 12:01.240]  There was no suit filed by the comptroller in my case
[12:01.240 --> 12:10.240]  Their officers just showed up with an armed goon squad full of automatic weapons and body armor and seized my business
[12:10.240 --> 12:13.240]  There was no suit
[12:13.240 --> 12:23.240]  So the letter of the law was not followed nor was it complied with in any way, shape, or form by anybody there, especially the judge
[12:23.240 --> 12:33.240]  who ignored that requirement of the law and refused to act upon my injunctive relief
[12:33.240 --> 12:42.240]  So folks, these people do not understand and even if they do, they do not care what the law says
[12:42.240 --> 12:47.240]  This is the reason we want to get in front of the legislature in Austin
[12:47.240 --> 12:54.240]  This is the reason why we need to assemble there en masse the day that we have this meeting
[12:54.240 --> 12:59.240]  We need to fill that gallery to overflowing
[12:59.240 --> 13:09.240]  And we need to make our presence felt, heard, seen, and announced that we've had enough
[13:09.240 --> 13:12.240]  We want this problem solved
[13:12.240 --> 13:14.240]  Here's the list of problems
[13:14.240 --> 13:20.240]  Here are the people's demands to correct the problem
[13:20.240 --> 13:27.240]  So when that day comes, as soon as we're able to get it set up and completed and we know when it is, we'll make sure we announce it on the show
[13:27.240 --> 13:38.240]  But folks, the information I gave out the other night on contacting the chairperson, the Speaker of the House for the state legislature
[13:38.240 --> 13:45.240]  Please put that to good use. Write in, call in, demand that they make this happen
[13:45.240 --> 13:52.240]  Demand that they assemble and listen to the petition of the people to tell them what they want fixed and why
[13:52.240 --> 13:56.240]  Because if we don't do it, it's not going to get done
[13:56.240 --> 14:05.240]  This section right here is going to be one of the first things, or one of the things out of the 50 I've got arranged already to be dealing with
[14:05.240 --> 14:12.240]  Which one of the primary issues I'm going to be bringing up down there is the absolute corruption of the justice system
[14:12.240 --> 14:22.240]  Right down from the clerk to every judge that will not obey the law, will not even read the law
[14:22.240 --> 14:27.240]  If we fix the judges, then we can fix the rest of it
[14:27.240 --> 14:34.240]  Because the judges are the linchpin that makes all the abuse viable for the government
[14:34.240 --> 14:43.240]  We put the judges under a magnifying glass in the hot sun and get that little bead drawed on them when we start seeing smoke curl up off their back
[14:43.240 --> 14:51.240]  We're going to get some action and it's going to be the kind we want. Let's make that happen
[14:51.240 --> 14:57.240]  Okay, Debra, you said there was an article that you may wish to mention tonight
[14:57.240 --> 15:13.240]  Yes, there's an article that came out just this past Friday actually concerning Arizona, this Arizona case
[15:13.240 --> 15:28.240]  It has to do with the federal lawsuit that has been filed by the federal government against the state of Arizona about Arizona's immigration law
[15:28.240 --> 15:30.240]  Which is not even an immigration law
[15:30.240 --> 15:41.240]  Basically what the law says is that if somebody has already been pulled over for a traffic stop like they ran a red light or they're suspected DUI or whatever
[15:41.240 --> 15:43.240]  Normal traffic stop
[15:43.240 --> 15:52.240]  If there's some kind of suspicion, reasonable suspicion on the part of the officer that the person he pulled over is not a U.S. citizen
[15:52.240 --> 15:58.240]  Like say for example they can't speak English, that would be a heads up
[15:58.240 --> 16:04.240]  Well then the officer would have the authority to request proof of immigration
[16:04.240 --> 16:14.240]  And if the person could not provide proof of citizenship status for the United States then the officer would then have the authority to arrest that person
[16:14.240 --> 16:19.240]  And turn them over to the U.S. immigration department
[16:19.240 --> 16:24.240]  I mean that's not a big deal people. I thought the police could already do that anyway
[16:24.240 --> 16:34.240]  I mean anytime you suspect somebody is not a proper citizen of this country, a documented citizen of this country, anybody could call immigration
[16:34.240 --> 16:45.240]  Okay so at any rate when we get back I'm going to read this article reporting on this hearing that was held, the first hearing in this case
[16:45.240 --> 16:49.240]  And you can tell right off the bat whose side the federal judge is on
[16:49.240 --> 16:56.240]  And it ain't the federal government so I'll tell you that. She had some very scathing remarks for the U.S. Solicitor General
[16:56.240 --> 17:23.240]  And I'll explain on the other side. We'll be right back
[17:26.240 --> 17:34.240]  We offer daily specials on coins and bullion. We're located at 5448 Barnett Road Suite 3
[17:34.240 --> 17:40.240]  And we're open Monday through Friday 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Saturdays 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
[17:40.240 --> 17:49.240]  You are welcome to stop in our shop during regular business hours or call 512-646-6440 with any questions
[17:49.240 --> 18:14.240]  Ask for Chad and say you heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or 90.1 FM. That's capital coin and bullion 512-646-6440
[18:14.240 --> 18:22.240]  Okay folks we're back. So yeah basically the Arizona law says that if you've already been pulled over for a traffic violation
[18:22.240 --> 18:32.240]  Or some kind of an alleged traffic violation and an officer suspects that you're not either a U.S. citizen or a citizen of a state or an American citizen
[18:32.240 --> 18:37.240]  Alright so please do not send me 10,000 Skype chats about don't you know the difference between a U.S. citizen and a man
[18:37.240 --> 18:50.240]  Don't even go there okay. So basically the bottom line is that if there's any reason to believe that the person is not a U.S. citizen
[18:50.240 --> 19:00.240]  Or an American citizen or a citizen of a state then the officer can request to see proof of their immigration status
[19:00.240 --> 19:08.240]  And if that's not provided or proper citizenship documentation for whichever type of citizen they may happen to be is not provided
[19:08.240 --> 19:16.240]  Then they can at that point arrest the person and turn them over to the immigration department
[19:16.240 --> 19:19.240]  Which I believe has been incorporated into the Department of Homeland Security
[19:19.240 --> 19:28.240]  Okay so I'm going to read this article from the Washington Post. This came out on Friday concerning what happened at this hearing
[19:28.240 --> 19:42.240]  The first hearing where the U.S. government, the federal government is petitioning to have basically that there would be no enforcement of this law until the end of this lawsuit
[19:42.240 --> 19:48.240]  Now the judge hasn't ruled on the case but like I said you can tell from reading this article whose side the judge is on already
[19:48.240 --> 19:59.240]  Okay here it is. A federal judge pushed back Thursday against a contention by the Obama Justice Department that a tough new Arizona immigration law set to take effect next week
[19:59.240 --> 20:06.240]  Would cause irreparable harm and intrude into the federal immigration enforcement
[20:06.240 --> 20:14.240]  The judge says why can't Arizona be as inhospitable as they wish to people who have entered or remain in the United States?
[20:14.240 --> 20:21.240]  U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton asked in appointed exchange with Deputy Solicitor General Edwin Needler
[20:21.240 --> 20:28.240]  Her comment came during a rare federal court hearing in the Justice Department's lawsuit against Arizona and Governor Jan Brewer
[20:28.240 --> 20:38.240]  Bolton, a Democratic appointee, also questioned a core part of the Justice Department's argument that she should declare the law unconstitutional
[20:38.240 --> 20:46.240]  Quote, that it is preempted by federal law because immigration enforcement is an exclusive federal prerogative
[20:46.240 --> 20:54.240]  How is there a preemption issue? the judge asked. I understand there may be other issues but you're arguing preemption
[20:54.240 --> 21:01.240]  Where is the preemption if everybody who is arrested for some crime has their immigration status checked?
[21:01.240 --> 21:08.240]  An issue in Thursday's hearing argued in a tan-colored special proceedings courtroom inside the federal courthouse
[21:08.240 --> 21:17.240]  Was whether Bolton would grant a preliminary injunction to stop the law from taking effect while the federal lawsuit proceeds
[21:17.240 --> 21:27.240]  As dozens of protesters marched outside, the hearing marked the first round in the Obama Administration's efforts to stop the state's crackdown on illegal immigration
[21:27.240 --> 21:33.240]  The tension in the courtroom reflected a broader national debate over what has become a political divisive issue
[21:33.240 --> 21:39.240]  Whether police should have the power to question people they suspect are in the United States illegally
[21:39.240 --> 21:48.240]  Quote, the regulation of immigration is unquestionably exclusively a federal power, Needler told a rapt courtroom
[21:48.240 --> 21:53.240]  Brewer, whose fierce criticism of the federal lawsuit has helped her popularity at home
[21:53.240 --> 21:59.240]  Watched silently from the front row drawing a good afternoon, Governor, from the judge
[21:59.240 --> 22:05.240]  Lawyers for Brewer argued with equal force that the legislation scheduled to take effect July 29th
[22:05.240 --> 22:13.240]  Is a legal expression of a sovereign state's rights to secure its borders against a tide of illegal immigration
[22:13.240 --> 22:17.240]  The federal government, the lawyers said, has failed to act
[22:17.240 --> 22:22.240]  Quote, we keep hearing that we can't really do anything about these illegal aliens
[22:22.240 --> 22:31.240]  Arizona should just deal with it, said John J. Borna, Arizona's lead attorney
[22:31.240 --> 22:36.240]  Well, the status quo is simply unacceptable
[22:36.240 --> 22:41.240]  The law, which Brewer signed in April, empowers police to question people they have
[22:41.240 --> 22:48.240]  Quote, reasonable suspicion are illegal immigrants and to send them to federal authorities for possible deportation
[22:48.240 --> 22:54.240]  President Obama, or should I say, Barry Sartaro, has strongly condemned the law
[22:54.240 --> 23:01.240]  And the Justice Department filed suit July 6, setting up an unusual clash between the federal government and the state
[23:01.240 --> 23:04.240]  Over who should enforce the nation's immigration laws
[23:04.240 --> 23:09.240]  Bolton did not indicate how she might rule, saying only that she will take the matter under advisement
[23:09.240 --> 23:14.240]  But she did subject Justice Department lawyers to some pointed questions
[23:14.240 --> 23:21.240]  Needler responded to her query about why Arizona authorities don't have the right to be inhospitable to illegal immigrants
[23:21.240 --> 23:26.240]  By saying the law has given the state the power to enforce immigration law
[23:26.240 --> 23:31.240]  Quote, in frankly an unprecedented and dramatic way
[23:31.240 --> 23:32.240]  All right, I'm going to break here
[23:32.240 --> 23:41.240]  I don't see how this Arizona law is granting the police with any power to enforce immigration issues whatsoever
[23:41.240 --> 23:46.240]  It just gives them the authority to question and check their immigration status
[23:46.240 --> 23:50.240]  And if they can't provide proof of it, then they turn them over to the feds
[23:50.240 --> 23:53.240]  Okay, again, I don't see what the big deal is
[23:53.240 --> 23:59.240]  Anybody can do that, anybody can call the immigration department if they suspect somebody is an illegal alien
[23:59.240 --> 24:03.240]  So whatever, at any rate, back to the article
[24:03.240 --> 24:08.240]  Quote, it is not for one of our states to be inhospitable in the way this statute does
[24:08.240 --> 24:14.240]  Needler said, citing his main argument, the legal doctrine of preemption
[24:14.240 --> 24:20.240]  Based on the Constitution's supremacy clause, it says federal law trumps state statutes
[24:20.240 --> 24:26.240]  Because the federal government has, quote, preeminent authority to regulate immigration matters
[24:26.240 --> 24:30.240]  The government's lawsuit argues the Arizona law must be struck down
[24:30.240 --> 24:33.240]  Bolton questioned key parts of that argument
[24:33.240 --> 24:38.240]  Especially relating to a section of the law that appears to require immigration status checks
[24:38.240 --> 24:45.240]  If police stop someone for another law enforcement purpose and suspect the person is an illegal immigrant
[24:45.240 --> 24:50.240]  Needler said the conflict with the federal law comes because the status checks are mandatory
[24:50.240 --> 24:58.240]  Which could lead to federal agencies being overwhelmed with deportation requests
[24:58.240 --> 25:06.240]  Top officials at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, whose agents will handle most of the calls from Arizona authorities
[25:06.240 --> 25:11.240]  If the law takes effect, have said they will not necessarily respond to every call
[25:11.240 --> 25:18.240]  Okay, folks, I just nearly fell out of my chair laughing when I read that paragraph in this article
[25:18.240 --> 25:23.240]  If I was the judge, I think I would have fallen out of the chair laughing on the bench
[25:23.240 --> 25:30.240]  Needler, this is the government solicitor general, is saying that there's a conflict with federal law
[25:30.240 --> 25:37.240]  Because basically the federal agencies would be overwhelmed with deportation requests
[25:37.240 --> 25:44.240]  Okay, if I was the judge, I would have said, Mr. Needler, can you please show me the statute
[25:44.240 --> 25:50.240]  That says that these agencies cannot be overwhelmed with deportation requests?
[25:50.240 --> 25:54.240]  I mean, how is that a conflict with federal law?
[25:54.240 --> 25:58.240]  I mean, this guy is a clown
[25:58.240 --> 26:03.240]  Well, that goes right along the same argument, though, that they'd be saying, you know
[26:03.240 --> 26:08.240]  How can you say there's too much oil in the Gulf to clean up so you're just not going to do it?
[26:08.240 --> 26:09.240]  Yeah, right, I know
[26:09.240 --> 26:15.240]  Well, there's a conflict with federal law because the agencies are just going to be overwhelmed with deportation requests
[26:15.240 --> 26:23.240]  Well, the Arizona attorney should have argued that the lack of enforcement by the federal government
[26:23.240 --> 26:30.240]  on those requirements of the immigration portions of the Constitution and the laws associated with it
[26:30.240 --> 26:33.240]  border on criminal neglect
[26:33.240 --> 26:35.240]  That's what he should have argued
[26:35.240 --> 26:43.240]  Yeah, well, that might be somewhere, but it did say earlier in the article that the solicitor
[26:43.240 --> 26:49.240]  I mean, not the solicitor, that the state of Arizona's attorney was arguing that the government
[26:49.240 --> 26:52.240]  That the federal government has failed to act, was the quote
[26:52.240 --> 26:59.240]  And so, yeah, but he does need to take it one step further that it is criminal neglect
[26:59.240 --> 27:00.240]  Okay, back to the art
[27:00.240 --> 27:07.240]  But still, I mean, if I was that judge, I would have said, can you please cite the statute and clause number?
[27:07.240 --> 27:09.240]  And what title is that, Mr. Needler?
[27:09.240 --> 27:17.240]  That of the federal law that says these agencies cannot be overwhelmed with requests
[27:17.240 --> 27:22.240]  I mean, just exactly what clause is that in which statute, Mr. Needler?
[27:22.240 --> 27:25.240]  I mean, what a ridiculous argument
[27:25.240 --> 27:29.240]  Okay, there's really no flexibility, Needler said
[27:29.240 --> 27:31.240]  Well, no, there's not
[27:31.240 --> 27:35.240]  I mean, you're either in this country legally or you're not
[27:35.240 --> 27:37.240]  Okay, back to the article
[27:37.240 --> 27:42.240]  He added that the Arizona law might lead to police harassment of U.S. citizens
[27:42.240 --> 27:50.240]  and is threatening to harm vital cooperation along the border with Mexican authorities who have strongly condemned the law
[27:50.240 --> 27:55.240]  Quote, these are very concrete harms, very substantial foreign policy concerns
[27:55.240 --> 28:02.240]  He said, Borama, that's the attorney for Arizona, Borama ridiculed the foreign policy concerns
[28:02.240 --> 28:07.240]  Quote, foreign outrage doesn't make the law preempted
[28:07.240 --> 28:12.240]  He said, he accused the Obama administration of ignoring requests from Brewer
[28:12.240 --> 28:16.240]  and numerous other governors for more help in securing the border
[28:16.240 --> 28:22.240]  Quote, you can't catch them if you don't know about them, he said, and they don't want to know about them
[28:22.240 --> 28:25.240]  Bolton is hearing six other lawsuits filed against the Arizona law
[28:25.240 --> 28:31.240]  A former Arizona state court judge, she was nominated for the federal bench by Bill Clinton
[28:31.240 --> 28:35.240]  but legal observers say she is hard to pigeonhole ideologically
[28:35.240 --> 28:38.240]  Outside the gleaming glass and white iron courthouse
[28:38.240 --> 28:41.240]  I don't know why that's necessary in the article
[28:41.240 --> 28:46.240]  Anyway, name for former Supreme Court Justice, Senator O'Connor, an angry subtext
[28:46.240 --> 28:51.240]  reflected the divide over how to handle the nation's estimated 12 million illegal immigrants
[28:51.240 --> 28:54.240]  Yeah, I think it's more like 30 or 40
[28:54.240 --> 29:01.240]  Anyway, opponents of the Arizona law clasped hands, prayed and held signs condemning it
[29:01.240 --> 29:05.240]  This law is racist, the police are harassing us because of our brown skin
[29:05.240 --> 29:10.240]  said Marcia Calderon, who sat next to a painting of the Virgin Mary affixed with a sign saying
[29:10.240 --> 29:15.240]  Stop SB 1070, as the immigration law is known
[29:15.240 --> 29:20.240]  Nearby, Brandy Barron waved an American flag and expressed her support for the law
[29:20.240 --> 29:23.240]  and her disgust at efforts to overturn it
[29:23.240 --> 29:26.240]  I am amazed that the Justice Department would have the nerve to sue us
[29:26.240 --> 29:30.240]  for trying to get laws that are already on the books enforced
[29:30.240 --> 29:31.240]  she said
[29:31.240 --> 29:34.240]  Indeed
[29:34.240 --> 29:37.240]  I mean, what's the big deal?
[29:37.240 --> 29:42.240]  You have to show, generally the police ask for all kinds of papers
[29:42.240 --> 29:47.240]  If they want to request the immigration papers too, and you can't show them
[29:47.240 --> 29:51.240]  Turn them over to the feds, I say, I like the Arizona law
[29:51.240 --> 29:56.240]  At any rate, that's the article, we'll get your comments on the other side
[29:56.240 --> 29:59.240]  512-646-1984
[30:01.240 --> 30:04.240]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM
[30:04.240 --> 30:07.240]  But finding things on the internet isn't so easy
[30:07.240 --> 30:10.240]  And neither is finding like-minded people to share it with
[30:10.240 --> 30:13.240]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then
[30:13.240 --> 30:14.240]  Brave New Books?
[30:14.240 --> 30:18.240]  Yes, Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for
[30:18.240 --> 30:21.240]  Like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, Angie Everett Griffin
[30:21.240 --> 30:25.240]  They even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps
[30:25.240 --> 30:27.240]  There's no way a place like that exists
[30:27.240 --> 30:29.240]  Go check it out for yourself
[30:29.240 --> 30:33.240]  It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT
[30:33.240 --> 30:36.240]  By UT, there's never anywhere to park down there
[30:36.240 --> 30:40.240]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers
[30:40.240 --> 30:44.240]  at the 500 MLK parking facility, just behind the bookstore
[30:44.240 --> 30:47.240]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[30:47.240 --> 30:52.240]  Monday through Saturday, 11 AM to 9 PM, and 1 to 6 PM on Sundays
[30:52.240 --> 30:56.240]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503
[30:56.240 --> 30:59.240]  Or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com
[31:01.240 --> 31:04.240]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[31:04.240 --> 31:07.240]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary
[31:07.240 --> 31:11.240]  The affordable, easy to understand, 4 CD course
[31:11.240 --> 31:15.240]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step by step
[31:15.240 --> 31:19.240]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing
[31:19.240 --> 31:23.240]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself
[31:23.240 --> 31:26.240]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course
[31:26.240 --> 31:28.240]  and now you can too
[31:28.240 --> 31:31.240]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[31:31.240 --> 31:34.240]  with 22 years of case-winning experience
[31:34.240 --> 31:39.240]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[31:39.240 --> 31:43.240]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts
[31:43.240 --> 31:47.240]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials
[31:47.240 --> 31:52.240]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more
[31:52.240 --> 31:56.240]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[31:56.240 --> 32:15.240]  or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ
[32:26.240 --> 32:50.240]  Okay, folks, we are back
[32:50.240 --> 32:57.240]  Please call in 512-646-1984 to discuss this issue or any other issue
[32:57.240 --> 33:03.240]  Tonight is Monday night, July 26, so that means it's Eddie's night
[33:03.240 --> 33:09.240]  So if you folks have questions on traffic issues, this is the night to call in
[33:09.240 --> 33:14.240]  So, Eddie, do you have any comments on this Arizona law situation?
[33:14.240 --> 33:21.240]  Well, yeah, just like I said, if I was the Arizona attorney,
[33:21.240 --> 33:25.240]  I would have definitely brought up the criminality of the federal government
[33:25.240 --> 33:27.240]  in refusing to enforce the laws
[33:27.240 --> 33:32.240]  I would have sought to bring Obama directly to the courtroom
[33:32.240 --> 33:38.240]  to answer why he will not enforce the laws as he's required to do
[33:38.240 --> 33:39.240]  and took an oath to do
[33:39.240 --> 33:43.240]  Well, wait a minute, just in the defense of that, this is not the trial
[33:43.240 --> 33:48.240]  This is only a hearing on whether the judge should grant a preliminary injunction
[33:48.240 --> 33:52.240]  against the Arizona law being enforced while the lawsuit is in progress
[33:52.240 --> 34:01.240]  Exactly, and that's exactly why I would have demanded testimony from Obama to that regard
[34:01.240 --> 34:02.240]  Well, okay
[34:02.240 --> 34:07.240]  I mean, as the executive officer, he is the one that was required to enforce the laws
[34:07.240 --> 34:11.240]  that would have prevented the necessity of the Arizona law
[34:11.240 --> 34:17.240]  Yeah, I would love for him to have to stay on the witness stand
[34:17.240 --> 34:19.240]  because he's told senators this in private
[34:19.240 --> 34:22.240]  and senators have gone public about this statement
[34:22.240 --> 34:26.240]  that Obama has told the senators or some key senators
[34:26.240 --> 34:29.240]  that he is not going to enforce immigration laws
[34:29.240 --> 34:36.240]  he is not going to make sure that the border is secure until he gets his immigration reform
[34:36.240 --> 34:42.240]  i.e. amnesty for all the illegal aliens that are already in the country
[34:42.240 --> 34:46.240]  I'd love to hear him have to say that on the witness stand
[34:46.240 --> 34:49.240]  And I would love to see him go to jail for it
[34:49.240 --> 34:50.240]  Me too
[34:50.240 --> 34:52.240]  Well, he shouldn't be in office anyway
[34:52.240 --> 34:54.240]  He's an illegal immigrant himself
[34:54.240 --> 34:57.240]  And that's exactly why he doesn't want to do it
[34:57.240 --> 34:58.240]  Yeah, no kidding
[34:58.240 --> 35:01.240]  If we start checking IDs, it's just like the cartoon said
[35:01.240 --> 35:04.240]  Obama, don't go to Arizona, they require proof of citizenship
[35:04.240 --> 35:06.240]  Yeah, no kidding
[35:06.240 --> 35:09.240]  Well, I've got to get Gary Creep on the show again
[35:09.240 --> 35:15.240]  because he's got his lawsuit against Obama or Barry Sartaro, as it were
[35:15.240 --> 35:18.240]  in front of the Supreme Court right now
[35:18.240 --> 35:21.240]  because this is sort of a constitutional crisis here
[35:21.240 --> 35:25.240]  because you can't really technically impeach the man
[35:25.240 --> 35:28.240]  He never took office to begin with
[35:28.240 --> 35:33.240]  He has to be physically removed by the US Marshals or something
[35:33.240 --> 35:34.240]  He was never qualified
[35:34.240 --> 35:39.240]  The thing is, he's not entitled to any of the protections or processes
[35:39.240 --> 35:42.240]  that would have been afforded a president either
[35:42.240 --> 35:44.240]  Right, that's the whole point
[35:44.240 --> 35:52.240]  And all of the money he's expended now becomes a personal liability for him
[35:52.240 --> 35:54.240]  Think about that
[35:54.240 --> 36:01.240]  He has usurped the United States Treasury to the worst degree of every president
[36:01.240 --> 36:05.240]  since the beginning of time of this country
[36:05.240 --> 36:11.240]  He has in his less than a year and a half taken and stolen more money
[36:11.240 --> 36:15.240]  from the people of America and given it to private industry
[36:15.240 --> 36:23.240]  than the entire budget for every government office holder we've had since we began
[36:23.240 --> 36:29.240]  And every single one of his political appointees either worked for Goldman Sachs
[36:29.240 --> 36:35.240]  or are currently members of one of the three following organizations
[36:35.240 --> 36:40.240]  Bilderberg Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations
[36:40.240 --> 36:45.240]  or some combination of all of the above
[36:45.240 --> 36:49.240]  And Kagan is no exception, she's a Goldman Sachs herself
[36:49.240 --> 36:55.240]  I can't think of anybody on Capitol Hill worth keeping
[36:55.240 --> 36:58.240]  right down to the mailboy
[36:58.240 --> 37:03.240]  And half of them are all dual citizens of Israel as well, I might add
[37:03.240 --> 37:06.240]  So they have absolutely no allegiance to this country whatsoever
[37:06.240 --> 37:08.240]  or doing what's good for this nation
[37:08.240 --> 37:11.240]  Well, but the problem is you can't be a dual citizen
[37:11.240 --> 37:14.240]  No, I know, I know
[37:14.240 --> 37:23.240]  I mean, the people of America have just gotten way too understanding and apathetic
[37:23.240 --> 37:25.240]  Just way too much people
[37:25.240 --> 37:28.240]  Yeah, and that is another law that's not being enforced
[37:28.240 --> 37:31.240]  It's selective enforcement
[37:31.240 --> 37:35.240]  These special people, they get to keep both passports
[37:35.240 --> 37:39.240]  They get to keep their passport from Israel and they get to have an American passport too
[37:39.240 --> 37:41.240]  They get to have dual citizenship
[37:41.240 --> 37:43.240]  But the common man doesn't get to have dual citizenship
[37:43.240 --> 37:47.240]  You want to be a citizen here, you have to give up the citizenship of your other country
[37:47.240 --> 37:50.240]  So yeah, it's just laws are being broken everywhere
[37:50.240 --> 37:53.240]  It's total lawlessness, it's rampant
[37:53.240 --> 38:00.240]  It's like these people that declare, have the irrational declaration
[38:00.240 --> 38:03.240]  that nobody should be allowed to own a gun
[38:03.240 --> 38:05.240]  I mean, that's just utter stupidity
[38:05.240 --> 38:10.240]  Let's put this sign in our front yards, folks, and see how well they like it then
[38:10.240 --> 38:13.240]  Just put up a sign in your front yard that says
[38:13.240 --> 38:17.240]  This house protected by Smith and Wesson three nights a week
[38:17.240 --> 38:20.240]  You guess which three
[38:20.240 --> 38:24.240]  However, if you're looking for an easy mark
[38:24.240 --> 38:31.240]  My neighbor has declared his house a gun-free zone and refuses to own a gun
[38:31.240 --> 38:33.240]  His address is
[38:33.240 --> 38:35.240]  Yeah, and there's a big arrow pointing next door
[38:35.240 --> 38:38.240]  Yeah, there's somebody that has a sign in their front yard like that
[38:38.240 --> 38:40.240]  That's pretty good
[38:40.240 --> 38:46.240]  Yeah, and Geithner has said, and I don't know what business he has mouthing off about these kinds of things
[38:46.240 --> 38:48.240]  Because he's the Secretary of the Treasury
[38:48.240 --> 38:54.240]  Again, another Goldman Sachs and former Goldman Sachs member, Slack's, Goldman Slack's, I should call it
[38:54.240 --> 38:59.240]  He said that anybody who's on a no-fly list should not be allowed to own a gun
[38:59.240 --> 39:04.240]  Even though you have like toddlers that are on no-fly lists because of some kind of computer glitch
[39:04.240 --> 39:06.240]  Give me a break
[39:06.240 --> 39:08.240]  Well, we've got some callers on the line
[39:08.240 --> 39:10.240]  Eddie, you want to go to some calls?
[39:10.240 --> 39:11.240]  Yes, ma'am
[39:11.240 --> 39:14.240]  All right, we're going to go to Dan in Connecticut first
[39:14.240 --> 39:17.240]  And then we have two other callers, someone I haven't screened yet
[39:17.240 --> 39:19.240]  And then Jason, Dan, thanks for calling in
[39:19.240 --> 39:22.240]  You have any comments on these issues?
[39:22.240 --> 39:29.240]  Well, other than the fact that I'd love to see Barry Satoro actually testify on the stand, not much
[39:29.240 --> 39:32.240]  All right, well, what do you got for us tonight?
[39:32.240 --> 39:41.240]  Well, first of all, now that I was thinking of this, the Libertarian Party of Connecticut is having its convention on the 21st of August
[39:41.240 --> 39:46.240]  And we have an awesome keynote speaker
[39:46.240 --> 39:48.240]  Ron Paul?
[39:48.240 --> 39:52.240]  No, Randy Kellen
[39:52.240 --> 39:53.240]  Who's he?
[39:53.240 --> 39:58.240]  I don't know who he is. You guys may have heard of him
[39:58.240 --> 40:07.240]  But aside from that, we actually found the Secretary of State, and our state is not exactly the sharpest tool in her shed
[40:07.240 --> 40:09.240]  Or any shed for that matter
[40:09.240 --> 40:15.240]  She actually came out with a press release and a media campaign using state funds, mind you
[40:15.240 --> 40:24.240]  And what she's doing is she's actively encouraging unaffiliated voters, of which the voter rolls consist of 42 percent of those
[40:24.240 --> 40:30.240]  To register in the Democratic and Republican parties
[40:30.240 --> 40:39.240]  And she put that on a press release that she was urging these people to change their affiliation
[40:39.240 --> 40:43.240]  Well, that all worked out real well, huh?
[40:43.240 --> 40:53.240]  As a matter of fact, since she did that, what I went ahead and did is I filed a complaint with the Federal Elections Commission
[40:53.240 --> 40:58.240]  Since it probably cost more than $5,000 and it influenced the federal election
[40:58.240 --> 41:04.240]  And the same complaint was actually mailed to the Office, the State Office of Ethics
[41:04.240 --> 41:09.240]  And the same complaint was also mailed to the State Election Enforcement Commission
[41:09.240 --> 41:15.240]  And I also set it up as a tort letter to her in her personal capacity
[41:15.240 --> 41:22.240]  Where I basically said, stop doing this or, you know, respond within 60 days
[41:22.240 --> 41:28.240]  So essentially she threw a porcupine up in the air and now she's catching it
[41:28.240 --> 41:29.240]  Indeed
[41:29.240 --> 41:35.240]  Well, let's hope she's wearing a blindfold and no gloves
[41:35.240 --> 41:39.240]  I mean, you know, to do something like that is the Secretary of State
[41:39.240 --> 41:47.240]  And to throw that on the Secretary of State website and to, in violation of the law, misuse the state seal
[41:47.240 --> 41:53.240]  This is clearly not educational and that's the only grounds, you know, of what she could have done this
[41:53.240 --> 42:02.240]  To misuse the state seal like that, you know, she's probably going to go to jail for like at least a year over this
[42:02.240 --> 42:04.240]  That's all?
[42:04.240 --> 42:08.240]  Oh, yeah, not quite
[42:08.240 --> 42:15.240]  There's also Connecticut General Statute 9-355, which is an election law addressing official fraud or neglect
[42:15.240 --> 42:17.240]  That's another year
[42:17.240 --> 42:20.240]  So it's probably going to be two at least
[42:20.240 --> 42:21.240]  And basically
[42:21.240 --> 42:26.240]  Well, let's see, will any of that put her on a no-fly list to prevent her from owning a gun?
[42:26.240 --> 42:33.240]  Well, considering the amount of money from the State Treasury that she used to pull this off
[42:33.240 --> 42:45.240]  That would probably make her a felon, in which case she will not own a gun anytime soon anyway
[42:45.240 --> 42:54.240]  Well, we act like we should expect this to be something different from these individuals
[42:54.240 --> 42:59.240]  Yeah, this seems more like the status quo, I would say
[42:59.240 --> 43:06.240]  Well, yeah, I mean the status quo like five months ago was her actually closing down a state historic landmark
[43:06.240 --> 43:15.240]  And opening it up only exclusively to people who were elected as Democrats and holding an exclusive Democrat only swearing-in ceremony
[43:15.240 --> 43:16.240]  Interesting
[43:16.240 --> 43:22.240]  Well, you know, I think we need to make a change to the dictionary definition of politician
[43:22.240 --> 43:30.240]  It really needs to just be changed to please see criminal with a dress code
[43:30.240 --> 43:38.240]  Yeah, but this one, I was particularly amazed that she fell off the election slash ethics tree
[43:38.240 --> 43:42.240]  And she hit every branch on the way down in terms of statutory violations
[43:42.240 --> 43:43.240]  Indeed
[43:43.240 --> 43:45.240]  All right, Dan, well thanks, we're going to break
[43:45.240 --> 43:48.240]  Thank you for calling in and giving us the update
[43:48.240 --> 43:51.240]  Oh, not a problem, I thought you'd find that amusing anyway
[43:51.240 --> 43:52.240]  Okay, great
[43:52.240 --> 43:54.240]  All right, we'll be back on the other side, folks
[43:54.240 --> 44:22.240]  We're going to go to Mohammed in Louisiana and then Jason in Texas
[44:54.240 --> 45:01.240]  So call 908-691-2608 or visit us at hempusa.org today
[45:24.240 --> 45:40.240]  All right, watching the spark slide
[45:40.240 --> 45:44.240]  This is the rule of law, Randy Kelton is on seminar
[45:44.240 --> 45:49.240]  We got Eddie Craig and Deborah Stevens here coming at you tonight
[45:49.240 --> 45:54.240]  We're taking your calls, folks, if you'd like to call in and ask questions, talk on the air, make comments
[45:54.240 --> 46:00.240]  512-646-1984 like the George Orwell book, that is the number
[46:00.240 --> 46:08.240]  If you just want to listen, please tune in to the stream at ruleoflawradio.com
[46:08.240 --> 46:12.240]  If you don't have internet, you can also listen on the listener line
[46:12.240 --> 46:19.240]  If you just want to listen, 512-485-9010
[46:19.240 --> 46:24.240]  And folks, even if you're out there in a city where you can listen to us on the AM and FM airwaves
[46:24.240 --> 46:31.240]  Please tune in to ruleoflawradio.com and pick up the stream anyway so we can get our numbers up on Shoutcast
[46:31.240 --> 46:35.240]  All right, in the meantime, we are going to your calls
[46:35.240 --> 46:37.240]  We've got Mohammed in Louisiana
[46:37.240 --> 46:39.240]  Mohammed, thanks for calling in
[46:39.240 --> 46:42.240]  What is on your mind tonight?
[46:42.240 --> 46:49.240]  All right, I don't know a lot about the more complicated political things you all talk about
[46:49.240 --> 46:55.240]  But I do have a story and some questions about, and it's political
[46:55.240 --> 46:58.240]  And it's related to the political and the legal system and all that
[46:58.240 --> 47:00.240]  Okay, go ahead, what's your question?
[47:00.240 --> 47:05.240]  Okay, so basically way back then, my iPod was stolen
[47:05.240 --> 47:10.240]  Back in February, my iPod was stolen while I was on a school bus
[47:10.240 --> 47:13.240]  We had undeniable video evidence of this
[47:13.240 --> 47:18.240]  And after several weeks of, you know, we complained until the resource officer did all that
[47:18.240 --> 47:23.240]  The school board didn't do anything until, you know, my mom actually complained to them
[47:23.240 --> 47:26.240]  With a formal email and all that
[47:26.240 --> 47:31.240]  And they proceeded and they went through the processes
[47:31.240 --> 47:35.240]  They arrested for theft of an iPod belonging to me, he pled guilty
[47:35.240 --> 47:41.240]  He received suspended sentence and unsupervised probation for six months
[47:41.240 --> 47:45.240]  But still no iPod, still no restitution
[47:45.240 --> 47:46.240]  They never gave the iPod back
[47:46.240 --> 47:50.240]  I think I remember your father calling in about this story
[47:50.240 --> 47:57.240]  And what was discussed was that criminal charges should be filed against the parents
[47:57.240 --> 48:04.240]  And the child who still has your iPod for possession of stolen property
[48:04.240 --> 48:07.240]  That is a separate crime other than theft
[48:07.240 --> 48:10.240]  But when I tried to do that, I was actually at the DA
[48:10.240 --> 48:19.240]  And when we tried to do that, the DA told me that you can't do that because it's still the same
[48:19.240 --> 48:21.240]  Well, it's not the same
[48:21.240 --> 48:23.240]  He doesn't know what he's talking about
[48:23.240 --> 48:24.240]  Double jeopardy or something
[48:24.240 --> 48:27.240]  Yeah, he doesn't know what he's talking about, but it's not the same
[48:27.240 --> 48:30.240]  It's a separate law and he needs to
[48:30.240 --> 48:35.240]  And we told your father that criminal charges need to be filed against the parents
[48:35.240 --> 48:38.240]  The parents haven't had any charges filed against them yet
[48:38.240 --> 48:43.240]  Because since the child is technically a minor, the parents are responsible for what the child does
[48:43.240 --> 48:47.240]  And all the property that's in the house
[48:47.240 --> 48:48.240]  Okay
[48:48.240 --> 48:55.240]  Possession of stolen property, he's been charged with stealing the property originally, but that's the child
[48:55.240 --> 49:00.240]  Now you need to press charges against the parents for possession of stolen property
[49:00.240 --> 49:05.240]  Separate offense, the DA knows this, they just don't want to do the job and the legwork
[49:05.240 --> 49:09.240]  And if they don't, yeah, and nothing has been filed against the parents yet
[49:09.240 --> 49:12.240]  So you all need to go after the parents
[49:12.240 --> 49:14.240]  Okay
[49:14.240 --> 49:15.240]  Okay
[49:15.240 --> 49:20.240]  What if the DA won't touch it? What if they're like, you know, they already told me
[49:20.240 --> 49:24.240]  And take it directly to the grand jury and take criminal charges against the DA along with it
[49:24.240 --> 49:26.240]  Yeah, go to the grand jury
[49:26.240 --> 49:29.240]  The DA is aiding and abetting a criminal act
[49:29.240 --> 49:30.240]  You bet
[49:30.240 --> 49:35.240]  By fusing to act upon it when he has knowledge it exists
[49:35.240 --> 49:37.240]  Right
[49:37.240 --> 49:41.240]  So you file criminal charges against the district attorney as well
[49:41.240 --> 49:42.240]  Okay
[49:42.240 --> 49:46.240]  And you can take them directly, your parents will have to of course
[49:46.240 --> 49:52.240]  But you'll need to go with them because you're the primary witness and the complainant
[49:52.240 --> 49:54.240]  And you would go directly to the grand jury
[49:54.240 --> 50:00.240]  And also what about filing a bar grievance against the district attorney as well?
[50:00.240 --> 50:02.240]  I would do that immediately
[50:02.240 --> 50:03.240]  Immediately
[50:03.240 --> 50:09.240]  I would file one for every time I've gone in and asked and for every lie I've been told
[50:09.240 --> 50:12.240]  We can't do that because of reason one
[50:12.240 --> 50:14.240]  We can't do that because of reason two
[50:14.240 --> 50:20.240]  Well, to me that's going to generate barcode complaint one and barcode complaint two
[50:20.240 --> 50:21.240]  Or I'm sorry, barcode
[50:21.240 --> 50:23.240]  Bar grievance
[50:23.240 --> 50:24.240]  Yeah, bar grievance
[50:24.240 --> 50:25.240]  Bar grievance one, yeah
[50:25.240 --> 50:28.240]  The bar grievances will ruin his career
[50:28.240 --> 50:32.240]  So you file those with the state bar
[50:32.240 --> 50:33.240]  So bar grievances
[50:33.240 --> 50:37.240]  You get his bond yanked out from under him and he cannot remain a district attorney
[50:37.240 --> 50:38.240]  That's right
[50:38.240 --> 50:41.240]  He's out of luck, he'll be working at McDonald's
[50:41.240 --> 50:42.240]  That's nice
[50:42.240 --> 50:43.240]  In fact
[50:43.240 --> 50:44.240]  He'll be more than he actually worth
[50:44.240 --> 50:46.240]  Yeah, I know, that's for sure
[50:46.240 --> 50:51.240]  But there is a case where some corrupt district attorney lost his bar card
[50:51.240 --> 50:55.240]  And he ended up being the managers of an Applebee's or something
[50:55.240 --> 50:59.240]  I mean, which is way more than what he was worth in that case
[50:59.240 --> 51:02.240]  But yeah, you can ruin his career with the bar grievances
[51:02.240 --> 51:03.240]  Okay
[51:03.240 --> 51:08.240]  Now also something else happened today, I don't know
[51:08.240 --> 51:10.240]  I didn't even know my dad was gone earlier
[51:10.240 --> 51:17.240]  But today he actually came to our door with another iPod
[51:17.240 --> 51:23.240]  And I was at work at the time, I work at school
[51:23.240 --> 51:29.240]  He came home and he gave it to my dad and he was like, can you drop the charges?
[51:29.240 --> 51:32.240]  Which my dad said, no
[51:32.240 --> 51:34.240]  And he left off
[51:34.240 --> 51:37.240]  So when I got home, he gave it to me and I took a look at it
[51:37.240 --> 51:40.240]  And I was like, this isn't my iPod
[51:40.240 --> 51:43.240]  It's 8 gigs, mine's 32
[51:43.240 --> 51:47.240]  And it has a different serial number, I just checked it
[51:47.240 --> 51:52.240]  And I looked at some of the things, none of it was my stuff
[51:52.240 --> 51:56.240]  And when I hit email to see if it had my email
[51:56.240 --> 51:59.240]  It's somebody else's email that was written in it
[51:59.240 --> 52:01.240]  It was probably another stolen one
[52:01.240 --> 52:06.240]  You better get rid of that because then they might come after you for possession of stolen property
[52:06.240 --> 52:08.240]  The kid probably stole
[52:08.240 --> 52:12.240]  Tomorrow we're going to call the DA and ask if it's stolen property
[52:12.240 --> 52:17.240]  Now wait a minute, who is currently in possession of this other iPod?
[52:17.240 --> 52:22.240]  Well right now, I was just given it by
[52:22.240 --> 52:24.240]  This same kid?
[52:24.240 --> 52:31.240]  The person who stole it gave it to my dad and my dad gave it to me
[52:31.240 --> 52:35.240]  So right now it's like sitting on my nightstand or something
[52:35.240 --> 52:38.240]  Okay, here's the problem
[52:38.240 --> 52:42.240]  It's very possible you've just been set up
[52:42.240 --> 52:45.240]  Yeah, really
[52:45.240 --> 52:50.240]  You need to immediately take that iPod to the police station
[52:50.240 --> 52:54.240]  And you need to inform them exactly where it originated from
[52:54.240 --> 52:56.240]  And exactly how it happened
[52:56.240 --> 52:57.240]  Right
[52:57.240 --> 53:04.240]  And that you believe he has now committed the same crime against someone else
[53:04.240 --> 53:08.240]  All right, I will definitely write this down
[53:08.240 --> 53:10.240]  Okay, and you can listen to this archive
[53:10.240 --> 53:16.240]  I'll have the archive posted about 15, 20, 30 minutes after the show is over tonight
[53:16.240 --> 53:18.240]  You can download the archive
[53:18.240 --> 53:25.240]  Your call came in at 8.45 p.m., which is three-fourths of the way through the first hour
[53:25.240 --> 53:30.240]  So you can go back and listen to the archive and listen to what we told you as well
[53:30.240 --> 53:35.240]  But yeah, you need to go to the police, bring that iPod back, tell them your story
[53:35.240 --> 53:42.240]  Tell them that you believe that this other kid has now committed the same crime again of stealing iPods
[53:42.240 --> 53:51.240]  And trying to set you up and that you want this child to have charges against him for possession of stolen property
[53:51.240 --> 53:55.240]  Because he's still got your iPod
[53:55.240 --> 53:57.240]  All right, yes ma'am, thank you
[53:57.240 --> 54:03.240]  Okay, and the bar grievances against the district attorney too, okay?
[54:03.240 --> 54:05.240]  And the bar grievances
[54:05.240 --> 54:06.240]  Okay
[54:06.240 --> 54:07.240]  All right
[54:07.240 --> 54:10.240]  Don't forget those, those are going to be very helpful and a lot of fun
[54:10.240 --> 54:11.240]  Yeah
[54:11.240 --> 54:17.240]  My dad was telling me something about it earlier, something about like, it was just like kicking them in the teeth
[54:17.240 --> 54:20.240]  Yeah, that's right, he could lose his job
[54:20.240 --> 54:25.240]  Yeah, well, DA also stands for dumb ASS
[54:25.240 --> 54:29.240]  Yeah, I would definitely agree with that after my experience
[54:29.240 --> 54:33.240]  All right, Mohammed, do you have any other questions?
[54:33.240 --> 54:35.240]  No ma'am, thank you very much
[54:35.240 --> 54:37.240]  All right, thank you Mohammed
[54:37.240 --> 54:39.240]  All right, that's excellent folks
[54:39.240 --> 54:45.240]  We have the youth calling in now and this is exactly what Frederick Graves was talking about
[54:45.240 --> 54:52.240]  The youth, the children then need to learn the law as well as us
[54:52.240 --> 54:59.240]  It's quite necessary and right now Frederick Graves is having a fundraiser for his American Justice Foundation
[54:59.240 --> 55:06.240]  And I would please encourage everyone out there to go to AmericanJusticeFoundation.com
[55:06.240 --> 55:11.240]  His organization, he needs the money to take it to the federal level
[55:11.240 --> 55:17.240]  He is going to be pushing to basically get public legal education in the schools
[55:17.240 --> 55:21.240]  So folks out there, please go to American Justice Foundation
[55:21.240 --> 55:23.240]  There's a deadline for the funds that he needs to raise
[55:23.240 --> 55:27.240]  He needs to raise $3,000 by I think the middle of next month
[55:27.240 --> 55:34.240]  So folks, any donation you can make would be much appreciated to AmericanJusticeFoundation.com
[55:34.240 --> 55:36.240]  Dr. Frederick Graves
[55:36.240 --> 55:38.240]  All right, we are going to continue to take your calls
[55:38.240 --> 55:43.240]  Folks, if you'd like to call in, 512-646-1984
[55:43.240 --> 55:45.240]  We've got Jason in Texas
[55:45.240 --> 55:47.240]  Jason, thanks for calling in
[55:47.240 --> 55:48.240]  What's on your mind tonight?
[55:48.240 --> 55:52.240]  Hey guys, I wish I was where Mohammed is when I was his age
[55:52.240 --> 55:55.240]  It would be great if you guys were around then
[55:55.240 --> 56:01.240]  Randy, I've got a question about the transportation code
[56:01.240 --> 56:07.240]  Do you know where I can find I've been trolling the transportation code for the better part of about two hours
[56:07.240 --> 56:17.240]  and I can't find the requirements I guess you'd say for officers towing your vehicle after a traffic stop
[56:17.240 --> 56:24.240]  What they're required to do and when they can't tow your vehicle
[56:24.240 --> 56:26.240]  Section 542, I do believe
[56:26.240 --> 56:29.240]  It's either 541 or 542
[56:29.240 --> 56:32.240]  Okay
[56:32.240 --> 56:36.240]  But again, they're only allowed to tow a motor vehicle
[56:36.240 --> 56:41.240]  Never ever a private vehicle, only a motor vehicle
[56:41.240 --> 56:44.240]  Okay, I called that I guess about two weeks ago
[56:44.240 --> 56:51.240]  I'm the guy who was arrested in front of his house when the cops said my pistol was visible in plain view when it wasn't
[56:51.240 --> 56:52.240]  Right
[56:52.240 --> 56:55.240]  So I am now going to set up my own deal
[56:55.240 --> 57:01.240]  I went and pulled my file and the lawyers got some motions in there that I can see through pretty easily
[57:01.240 --> 57:03.240]  I'm pretty sure the judge has shoot it down
[57:03.240 --> 57:06.240]  So I'm pretty much doing my own leg work now
[57:06.240 --> 57:09.240]  And he'll be getting the bar agreements for that
[57:09.240 --> 57:14.240]  But I'm going to start with the officers and disqualify them for their actions
[57:14.240 --> 57:18.240]  I figured I can't get them on stopping me because they got a call
[57:18.240 --> 57:22.240]  So they had probable cause to stop me, probable cause to search my van
[57:22.240 --> 57:26.240]  Ah, but you can get them on aggravated perjury
[57:26.240 --> 57:30.240]  And you can get them on malicious prosecution
[57:30.240 --> 57:33.240]  Aggravated perjury on which part?
[57:33.240 --> 57:41.240]  When they swore out a complaint against you that you did this, that was a false statement, was it not?
[57:41.240 --> 57:42.240]  Sure
[57:42.240 --> 57:49.240]  And they did it with the purpose and intent of causing you harm by allowing you to be fined and or arrested, did they not?
[57:49.240 --> 57:51.240]  Yeah, exactly
[57:51.240 --> 57:53.240]  That's malicious
[57:53.240 --> 57:56.240]  Okay, let me write all this down real quick
[57:56.240 --> 58:00.240]  Okay, and then so now I'm looking for, I'll go back to that
[58:00.240 --> 58:06.240]  But I'm looking to disqualify them for showing my vehicle and also the magistrate later on
[58:06.240 --> 58:10.240]  Okay, well hang on just a second, we're about to go to break
[58:10.240 --> 58:15.240]  This is Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton is doing one of his seminars so he is off tonight
[58:15.240 --> 58:20.240]  Rule of Law Radio, hang on to the other side folks, we'll be right back after this break
[58:20.240 --> 58:26.240]  Yes, and we've also got Anthony from California, so Jason we're going to go right back to you after the top of the hour news
[58:26.240 --> 58:50.240]  And then we'll go to Anthony, callers if you'd like to call in, 512-646-1984, we will be right back
[58:56.240 --> 58:58.240]  Thank you
[59:26.240 --> 59:28.240]  Thank you
[59:56.240 --> 01:00:03.240]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Network
[01:00:03.240 --> 01:00:08.240]  Roadside bombs killed five US troops in southern Afghanistan Saturday
[01:00:08.240 --> 01:00:17.240]  NATO spokesman Colonel Rafael Torres said one third of improvised explosive devices or IEDs wound or kill innocent civilians
[01:00:17.240 --> 01:00:27.240]  In Iowa a 300 foot long breach in Lake Delhi Dam Saturday sent water cascading downstream and hundreds of people fleeing for safety
[01:00:27.240 --> 01:00:31.240]  Dam operation manager David Fink called the breach catastrophic
[01:00:31.240 --> 01:00:37.240]  The dam 45 miles north of Cedar Rapids failed following massive rainfall
[01:00:37.240 --> 01:00:43.240]  Consumer Reports has found seven of ten Blue Cross Blue Shield affiliates examined
[01:00:43.240 --> 01:00:48.240]  Had a mass surpluses more than three times the level regulators deemed necessary
[01:00:48.240 --> 01:00:55.240]  At the close of 2009, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona had a surplus of 717 million
[01:00:55.240 --> 01:00:58.240]  More than seven times the regulatory minimum
[01:00:58.240 --> 01:01:03.240]  The same year the company raised premiums for individuals up to 18 percent
[01:01:03.240 --> 01:01:12.240]  A huge cage of secret US military files has provided a devastating portrait of the failing war in Afghanistan
[01:01:12.240 --> 01:01:20.240]  The documents disclosed by the website WikiLeaks reveal how coalition forces have killed hundreds of civilians in unreported incidents
[01:01:20.240 --> 01:01:27.240]  Taliban attacks have soared and NATO commanders fear Pakistan and Iran of fueling the insurgency
[01:01:27.240 --> 01:01:36.240]  The disclosed has come from more than 90,000 records of incidents and intelligence reports in one of the biggest leaks in US military history
[01:01:36.240 --> 01:01:45.240]  The files made available to the UK Guardian, the New York Times and Der Spiegel give a blow-by-blow account of the fighting over the last six years
[01:01:45.240 --> 01:01:53.240]  The war logs detail how a secret black unit of special forces hunts down Taliban leaders for kill or capture without trial
[01:01:53.240 --> 01:01:58.240]  How the US covered up evidence the Taliban have acquired deadly surface-to-air missiles
[01:01:58.240 --> 01:02:04.240]  And how the Taliban's roadside bomb campaign has killed more than 2,000 civilians
[01:02:04.240 --> 01:02:10.240]  Former CIA director Michael Hayden says military action against Iran now seems more likely
[01:02:10.240 --> 01:02:17.240]  Because no matter what the US does diplomatically, Tehran keeps pushing ahead with its suspected nuclear program
[01:02:17.240 --> 01:02:23.240]  Hayden said during his tenure a strike against Iran was, quote, way down the list of options
[01:02:23.240 --> 01:02:26.240]  But he says such action now seems inexorable
[01:02:26.240 --> 01:02:33.240]  Hayden went on, Iran, left to its own devices, will get itself to that step right below a nuclear weapon
[01:02:33.240 --> 01:02:39.240]  That permanent breakout stage, so the needle isn't quite in the red for the international community
[01:02:39.240 --> 01:02:43.240]  He added that will be as destabilizing as they're actually having a weapon
[01:02:43.240 --> 01:02:49.240]  Russia, a one-time key ally of Iran, backed the latest UN sanctions last month
[01:02:49.240 --> 01:03:03.240]  Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad accused Russia's president last week of joining the US in spreading lies about its nuclear program
[01:03:19.240 --> 01:03:29.240]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty
[01:03:29.240 --> 01:03:37.240]  I read his book and it says it cares not for the unsightly
[01:03:37.240 --> 01:03:46.240]  These warmongers come by that term rightly
[01:03:46.240 --> 01:03:49.240]  I won't pay for the war with my body
[01:03:49.240 --> 01:03:52.240]  Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money
[01:03:52.240 --> 01:03:56.240]  I won't pay for the fun with my body
[01:03:56.240 --> 01:03:59.240]  All right, folks, we are back, Rule of Law Radio
[01:03:59.240 --> 01:04:02.240]  This is Monday night, our traffic night, we are on with Jason
[01:04:02.240 --> 01:04:06.240]  Jason, please go ahead
[01:04:06.240 --> 01:04:19.240]  There were about seven of them here at that time and they were all talking and going back and forth, so would that be conspiracy?
[01:04:19.240 --> 01:04:23.240]  Very well could be if they all agreed to the same thing
[01:04:23.240 --> 01:04:28.240]  They sure did because they were having a powwow and there was even a supervisor there on duty
[01:04:28.240 --> 01:04:35.240]  Then I would name every one of them, criminal conspiracy, and you're where?
[01:04:35.240 --> 01:04:38.240]  In New England County, Corpus Christi
[01:04:38.240 --> 01:04:44.240]  Okay, then I'd go with organized criminal activity under Chapter 71 Penal Code as well
[01:04:44.240 --> 01:04:46.240]  Okay, Penal Code
[01:04:46.240 --> 01:04:48.240]  All right, now real quick on to-
[01:04:48.240 --> 01:04:55.240]  Now, you also have a case of official misconduct, abuse of official capacity, and official oppression
[01:04:55.240 --> 01:05:02.240]  Abuse of official capacity is 39.02, official oppression is 39.03 Penal Code
[01:05:02.240 --> 01:05:08.240]  Okay, I'll have to check out all the elements for each one of those
[01:05:08.240 --> 01:05:14.240]  Okay, moving on real quick to the Magistrate, the Magistration as they like to call it
[01:05:14.240 --> 01:05:19.240]  That's the day I went down and got an open records request under the Penal Code
[01:05:19.240 --> 01:05:29.240]  Actually, Code of Criminal Procedure Article 15.17 says that an examining trial must be recorded
[01:05:29.240 --> 01:05:33.240]  And have you found any research as to what that exactly means?
[01:05:33.240 --> 01:05:38.240]  It doesn't say whether it's audio, video, or transcript
[01:05:38.240 --> 01:05:46.240]  There has to be a record. It can be by court reporter, it can be audio, video, or both
[01:05:46.240 --> 01:05:56.240]  Okay, so whenever I made my open records request, I just put audio, video, or transcript of cause number, yada, yada, on so-and-so day
[01:05:56.240 --> 01:06:03.240]  So we'll see how that comes up, but I pulled that to prove that during the, you know,
[01:06:03.240 --> 01:06:09.240]  I guess you could, if you wanted to call it an examining trial, that there was no testimony of the witness
[01:06:09.240 --> 01:06:15.240]  No, in an examining trial, you were allowed to do every single thing you would at regular trial
[01:06:15.240 --> 01:06:16.240]  Sure, sure
[01:06:16.240 --> 01:06:20.240]  Examine the evidence, cross-examine the witnesses, the whole nine yards
[01:06:20.240 --> 01:06:27.240]  Right, and I just wanted to show you, you know, make a record that the officer and or the jailer didn't testify in it
[01:06:27.240 --> 01:06:31.240]  You know, so the due process wasn't followed there
[01:06:31.240 --> 01:06:39.240]  And there was no, they didn't ask me for a plea and, which I don't believe they have to in that deal
[01:06:39.240 --> 01:06:47.240]  But also, where was I going with that?
[01:06:47.240 --> 01:06:55.240]  I just wanted to show basically that they didn't go through the due process of the magistrate, and then I could disqualify him, too
[01:06:55.240 --> 01:07:01.240]  Correct, you can show that he aided and abetted, or at the very least was negligent in his duties,
[01:07:01.240 --> 01:07:06.240]  which also is official misconduct and official oppression and abuse of official capacity
[01:07:06.240 --> 01:07:14.240]  Okay, well it looks like I got some homework to do, because like I said, my lawyer isn't going to do it for me, so I'm going to have to
[01:07:14.240 --> 01:07:15.240]  Yeah
[01:07:15.240 --> 01:07:21.240]  I'm doing this, but I guess I need to see how I can do this, because I'm going to have to do all this legwork myself
[01:07:21.240 --> 01:07:29.240]  and come up with all these motions and charges and stuff, and I know he's going to, is this something that I should spring on him,
[01:07:29.240 --> 01:07:33.240]  or is this something I should tell him about and tell him to get ready to fight for it, or?
[01:07:33.240 --> 01:07:42.240]  Well, here's the problem, if you have an attorney, okay, then the judge is not going to let you file anything on your own behalf
[01:07:42.240 --> 01:07:45.240]  You're going to have to bet on it
[01:07:45.240 --> 01:07:46.240]  Okay
[01:07:45.240 --> 01:07:55.240]  All right, so the only thing you can do as far as the criminal complaints are concerned is to take them and either try to file them with the judge,
[01:07:55.240 --> 01:08:06.240]  or magistrate rather, or to take them directly to the grand jury yourself, but if you go through anyone, you're going to get stalemated, roadblocked, or threatened
[01:08:06.240 --> 01:08:13.240]  Okay, and I haven't had, I've been reset on my pretrial hearing six times now, and
[01:08:13.240 --> 01:08:19.240]  Okay, why isn't your attorney moving for a denial of a speedy trial?
[01:08:19.240 --> 01:08:31.240]  I'm not sure yet, like I say, I don't think that, he keeps telling me, like I said in a previous call, he said that the prosecuting attorney agreed to move to dismiss it
[01:08:31.240 --> 01:08:38.240]  So I haven't seen that on any paper, and they're still wanting us to go to a pretrial hearing, and of course the judge has the final say on that bill
[01:08:38.240 --> 01:08:41.240]  He's got to approve that, but
[01:08:41.240 --> 01:08:51.240]  Yeah, the prosecuting attorney has to file a request for dismissal, which the judge has to approve, but it's extremely rare when a judge will not approve a dismissal
[01:08:51.240 --> 01:08:59.240]  when the prosecuting attorney states, we're wanting a dismissal because it's a false accusation, we have no proof there was no crime
[01:08:59.240 --> 01:09:09.240]  So any judge that wants to proceed after that has a severe issue about impartiality and a right of due process
[01:09:09.240 --> 01:09:16.240]  Right, now is that something that I should be able to go find in the court file? In my court file for the
[01:09:16.240 --> 01:09:28.240]  No, not necessarily if it's just a plea agreement or a discussion on dismissal, there's not necessarily going to be any paperwork generated unless the prosecuting attorney
[01:09:28.240 --> 01:09:32.240]  has already submitted his written request for dismissal
[01:09:32.240 --> 01:09:36.240]  Okay, I went and looked at my record last week and I didn't see anything
[01:09:36.240 --> 01:09:44.240]  Yeah, now there's also the possibility he has to submit something in writing because a judge would have to sign an order for the dismissal
[01:09:44.240 --> 01:09:48.240]  So there would have to be something in writing before it could even be granted
[01:09:48.240 --> 01:09:54.240]  Okay, and that would have to be in that file before our pretrial hearing, right?
[01:09:54.240 --> 01:09:59.240]  Well, not necessarily before, the prosecutor could file it at the hearing
[01:09:59.240 --> 01:10:09.240]  Okay, wow, I wish I could get a hold of that paper because it sure would save me a lot of time, but it's a good education
[01:10:09.240 --> 01:10:17.240]  Oh, believe me, you want to go to court to see this through to the end as far as being present when it's dismissed
[01:10:17.240 --> 01:10:26.240]  You want to make certain that you get a copy of the order and you want to make certain that you get a copy of everything that's in the possession of everybody
[01:10:26.240 --> 01:10:29.240]  that's not a protected work file record
[01:10:29.240 --> 01:10:34.240]  Okay, make sure it's dismissed with prejudice, huh?
[01:10:34.240 --> 01:10:41.240]  Yes, and you make very certain of that because you're going to need all of these documents when you go after these guys
[01:10:41.240 --> 01:10:43.240]  Okay, all right
[01:10:43.240 --> 01:10:48.240]  So make sure that whatever you get is a certified copy of whatever is there
[01:10:48.240 --> 01:10:51.240]  Right, which goes to something else I was wondering about
[01:10:51.240 --> 01:10:56.240]  In my court file, there was all the motions of my attorney to file those four of them
[01:10:56.240 --> 01:11:01.240]  And there was a form for I guess the judge's ruling on each one that was blank
[01:11:01.240 --> 01:11:03.240]  It was in that court file
[01:11:03.240 --> 01:11:07.240]  Okay, here's the thing about the rules in Texas
[01:11:07.240 --> 01:11:15.240]  Any order that goes unsigned on a filed motion is presumed to be a denial
[01:11:15.240 --> 01:11:17.240]  So keep that in mind
[01:11:17.240 --> 01:11:23.240]  It was completely blank. It was just the form, you know, that has fill in the blanks with nothing on it
[01:11:23.240 --> 01:11:30.240]  And the clerk would not certify those pages
[01:11:30.240 --> 01:11:37.240]  There was one for each motion in the file and she would not certify them
[01:11:37.240 --> 01:11:43.240]  Well, in that case, well, their blank, was it an order you said?
[01:11:43.240 --> 01:11:46.240]  Is that what it was, was a blank order?
[01:11:46.240 --> 01:11:47.240]  Yes
[01:11:47.240 --> 01:11:53.240]  Okay, yeah, I don't know why they wouldn't certify it as being blank when you got the copy
[01:11:53.240 --> 01:12:04.240]  That's just ignorant, but that being said, that's not really a big deal whether or not, if it's a blank order, whether or not it was certified
[01:12:04.240 --> 01:12:11.240]  Okay, all right, well, you give me a bunch to look through here so I'll get on and I'll call you all back I guess on Thursday
[01:12:11.240 --> 01:12:12.240]  Okay
[01:12:12.240 --> 01:12:15.240]  All right, thanks, Jason
[01:12:15.240 --> 01:12:18.240]  Okay, we're going now to Anthony in California
[01:12:18.240 --> 01:12:21.240]  After that, the call board is wide open
[01:12:21.240 --> 01:12:27.240]  So folks, we've got about another 45, 50 minutes here if you'd like to call in and ask us some questions or make comments
[01:12:27.240 --> 01:12:31.240]  512-646-1984
[01:12:31.240 --> 01:12:34.240]  Anthony, thanks for calling in, what's on your mind tonight?
[01:12:34.240 --> 01:12:37.240]  Yes, hi, can you hear me?
[01:12:37.240 --> 01:12:38.240]  Yes, go ahead
[01:12:38.240 --> 01:12:46.240]  Okay, yes, my background is pretty much, I have a banking background primarily in mortgages
[01:12:46.240 --> 01:12:51.240]  And I'm actually trying to help a friend from a foreclosure
[01:12:51.240 --> 01:13:06.240]  And I came across you guys actually from listening through Alex Jones and Randy Kelton just kind of stuck out there like someone that really was protecting the people
[01:13:06.240 --> 01:13:12.240]  So that's partially why I'm calling in because I was hoping I could speak with him, but it sounds like he's out
[01:13:12.240 --> 01:13:21.240]  He's actually giving a seminar tonight on mortgage fraud, so he's not here with us tonight, but he will be back on Thursday night
[01:13:21.240 --> 01:13:24.240]  But Eddie and I could speak with you
[01:13:24.240 --> 01:13:34.240]  Yes, it's funny you mention that because that's actually how my friend, that was her defense because if you look at constitutional money, gold and silver coins shall pay off
[01:13:34.240 --> 01:13:42.240]  That's Article 1, Section 2, I think which clause it is, Article 1, Section 2 though
[01:13:42.240 --> 01:13:50.240]  And basically she had someone, she hired some people to write up pleadings for her and she got a jury trial
[01:13:50.240 --> 01:13:57.240]  And so she beat the odds in California to get the actual trial on an unlawful container, it's really rare
[01:13:57.240 --> 01:14:09.240]  So we're on a good roll and I just wanted to continue that good streak and Randy seemed like he was really good at making the judges, the district attorneys obey so to speak
[01:14:09.240 --> 01:14:15.240]  Yeah, now the way that I know that Randy handles mortgage fraud issues because I understand what you're saying about the Constitution
[01:14:15.240 --> 01:14:25.240]  But there are legal tender laws and so that can get complicated because certain laws have been passed, but Randy doesn't deal with all of that
[01:14:25.240 --> 01:14:32.240]  And also you have to deal with HJR 192 which says that no longer can debts be paid but they have to be discharged
[01:14:32.240 --> 01:14:35.240]  So then there's the whole commercial aspect of it as well
[01:14:35.240 --> 01:14:44.240]  But the way that Randy deals with it is that he doesn't go to those issues, he doesn't approach things from that kind of a point of view
[01:14:44.240 --> 01:15:00.240]  He looks for legal violations, he looks for violations in law that have been made on the part of the banking industry because there are very specific laws regulating the mortgage industry from state to state and also at the federal level
[01:15:00.240 --> 01:15:16.240]  And pretty much every mortgage has literally hundreds of violations in the paperwork of the mortgage itself violating statutes at the federal level and at the state level
[01:15:16.240 --> 01:15:31.240]  And so what he does is he does an audit, a mortgage analysis audit of the mortgage paperwork itself and discovers what all of the violations are and then helps people write up lawsuits
[01:15:31.240 --> 01:15:35.240]  So you don't have to get into these constitutional issues
[01:15:35.240 --> 01:15:48.240]  Okay, the reason why I mention this is I took the jurisdictionary Dr. Graves and he does say you can bring, he recommends case law but if you really have to you can bring
[01:15:48.240 --> 01:16:00.240]  And since I don't really know how to use case law because I have a banking background not a legal background, I guess they could try Lois Law or Lexis Nexus I've heard
[01:16:00.240 --> 01:16:09.240]  Another thing was how do you, when a judge overrules you how do you make him make sure that he's not doing a frivolous overruling, how do you put him on?
[01:16:09.240 --> 01:16:15.240]  That's the objection, that's when you do an objection, everything like Graves teaches in his course you just object to everything
[01:16:15.240 --> 01:16:24.240]  I mean you can't stop a judge from overruling you but when you object you're setting, you're laying everything out for your appeal
[01:16:24.240 --> 01:16:26.240]  Yes, I do remember that
[01:16:26.240 --> 01:16:38.240]  So you have to get as much on the record as possible in the trial court and you have to object when the judge starts violating case law and violating statute
[01:16:38.240 --> 01:16:43.240]  And when the judge is violating your rights you have to object, you can't just let things fly
[01:16:43.240 --> 01:16:50.240]  When the other, when the opposing party does things that they're not supposed to be doing and violating your rights you have to object
[01:16:50.240 --> 01:16:56.240]  Even if you get overruled because if you don't then you won't have that point for the appeal
[01:16:56.240 --> 01:16:59.240]  Alright we'll be right back Anthony, hang on the line
[01:16:59.240 --> 01:17:08.240]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM but finding things on the internet isn't so easy and neither is finding like minded people to share it with
[01:17:08.240 --> 01:17:11.240]  Oh well I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then
[01:17:11.240 --> 01:17:13.240]  Brave New Books?
[01:17:13.240 --> 01:17:20.240]  Yes, Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul and G. Edward Griffin
[01:17:20.240 --> 01:17:24.240]  They even stock inner food, Berkey products and Calvin Soaps
[01:17:24.240 --> 01:17:26.240]  There's no way a place like that exists
[01:17:26.240 --> 01:17:32.240]  Go check it out for yourself, it's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street just south of UT
[01:17:32.240 --> 01:17:35.240]  By UT, there's never anywhere to park down there
[01:17:35.240 --> 01:17:43.240]  Actually they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore
[01:17:43.240 --> 01:17:46.240]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:17:46.240 --> 01:17:51.240]  Monday through Saturday, 11 AM to 9 PM and 1 to 6 PM on Sundays
[01:17:51.240 --> 01:18:16.240]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com
[01:18:16.240 --> 01:18:22.240]  Okay here we go, we are back, we are speaking with Anthony in California
[01:18:22.240 --> 01:18:29.240]  And yes Anthony, the way I see it, the way that Randy handles mortgage fraud issues
[01:18:29.240 --> 01:18:37.240]  It's kind of similar to what Michael Mears does, the way Michael Mears handles third party debt collectors
[01:18:37.240 --> 01:18:43.240]  He doesn't address the debt, he doesn't address the payment of debt or how it can only be paid with gold and silver
[01:18:43.240 --> 01:18:48.240]  And the fact the banks won't take that, they want Federal Reserve notes, he doesn't even go to the issue of the debt at all
[01:18:48.240 --> 01:18:53.240]  Michael Mears, the way he handles third party debt collectors and creditors
[01:18:53.240 --> 01:18:59.240]  Is that he deals with civil rights violations, the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act
[01:18:59.240 --> 01:19:08.240]  The Fair Credit Reporting Act, when these creditors and debt collectors violate those laws
[01:19:08.240 --> 01:19:14.240]  Then you sue them and as they rack up the violations, like every time they call you on your cell phone
[01:19:14.240 --> 01:19:20.240]  And it costs you minutes, that's a $1500 fine under the TCPA Act
[01:19:20.240 --> 01:19:25.240]  And so you rack up all these violations, you get them to violate, which they are going to anyway
[01:19:25.240 --> 01:19:34.240]  They never abide by any of these civil rights acts regarding debt collection and reporting in the credit bureaus
[01:19:34.240 --> 01:19:42.240]  And so then you sue them and as part of the settlement agreement, you require that they dismiss
[01:19:42.240 --> 01:19:48.240]  They retire the account, is what it's called, and that they can't sell it to another debt collector and the whole thing goes away
[01:19:48.240 --> 01:19:53.240]  So it's not about the debt at all, well it's sort of similar to that, the way that Randy handles the mortgage issues
[01:19:53.240 --> 01:20:02.240]  He looks for violations of law in the mortgage itself and he says there's not one mortgage that is proper according to law
[01:20:02.240 --> 01:20:08.240]  So I would recommend that you would call in on Thursday for more information on that
[01:20:08.240 --> 01:20:14.240]  Because that is strictly statutory and you always want to use a statute when possible
[01:20:14.240 --> 01:20:23.240]  Because the statute is a statute and it's undebatable and unless it's been overturned by a court case, it stands
[01:20:23.240 --> 01:20:26.240]  Statute always stands above case law, so
[01:20:26.240 --> 01:20:34.240]  Okay, so statutes are above case law, so the credit river decision which basically said that
[01:20:34.240 --> 01:20:40.240]  You know, you've heard of the credit river decision, that is overruled by statutes
[01:20:40.240 --> 01:20:46.240]  Unless it specifically strikes down a law
[01:20:46.240 --> 01:20:56.240]  Okay, he was pretty much striking down, the credit river decision was striking down that there was no consideration, therefore
[01:20:56.240 --> 01:21:02.240]  Federal reserve notes are, he wouldn't even do the appeals because the bank tried to appeal with federal reserve notes
[01:21:02.240 --> 01:21:11.240]  And it was never overturned because the judge ruled in favor of the people instead of the federal reserve
[01:21:11.240 --> 01:21:16.240]  Well, I'm not specifically familiar with that case, but I do know that Randy is having great success
[01:21:16.240 --> 01:21:26.240]  Just strictly doing an analysis and audit of the mortgages and finding the violations of law that the banks have committed in the mortgages
[01:21:26.240 --> 01:21:33.240]  And then going after the banks and getting the entire mortgage dismissed and people come away with their houses
[01:21:33.240 --> 01:21:37.240]  So you would do a counterclaim or a countersuit?
[01:21:37.240 --> 01:21:42.240]  No, well if you've already been sued by the bank, yes, it would have to be a countersuit
[01:21:42.240 --> 01:21:51.240]  But if the bank hasn't come after you yet in a foreclosure proceeding, the time to sue the bank is before you go into foreclosure
[01:21:51.240 --> 01:21:52.240]  Okay
[01:21:52.240 --> 01:21:53.240]  Okay
[01:21:53.240 --> 01:22:00.240]  All right, you look for the, the best time to do it is if you're having no problem making your monthly payments whatsoever
[01:22:00.240 --> 01:22:10.240]  You, that's the best time to have your mortgage analysis done and get out from underneath the debt by having a mortgage analysis done of an audit
[01:22:10.240 --> 01:22:18.240]  A mortgage audit and find all the violations and then you're the plaintiff straight up and just sue the bank before anything happens
[01:22:18.240 --> 01:22:21.240]  Before you may even start to have trouble making payments
[01:22:21.240 --> 01:22:31.240]  Well, some advice that I was, or feedback I was going to give is in here in California there's a group trying to set up a class action pro se
[01:22:31.240 --> 01:22:37.240]  So it's not represented by attorney, we're all going to go in basically representing ourselves in a class action
[01:22:37.240 --> 01:22:46.240]  So we're going to start our own suit and then join with each other and the way we're going to approach it is that there is violations
[01:22:46.240 --> 01:22:57.240]  Because there's, there's disturbing the peace is a violation because a foreclosure proceeding if they sell a house when the market's down
[01:22:57.240 --> 01:23:06.240]  Not only are you, the trustee who's really a bank official just in another corporation is selling it at a loss
[01:23:06.240 --> 01:23:19.240]  That's actually an injury, that's a financial injury but there's actually a physical injury as well because if you're taken out of your community
[01:23:19.240 --> 01:23:24.240]  And basically thrown into a ghetto which is, and here in central California there's two and a half murders a day
[01:23:24.240 --> 01:23:33.240]  It's pretty much, you're safer in Iraq than you are in central LA and that's basically what they're trying to do is they're disturbing, they're really disturbing the peace
[01:23:33.240 --> 01:23:38.240]  Well has somebody actually already been thrown out of their house, has the house already been sold?
[01:23:38.240 --> 01:23:47.240]  Well there, some people in the group have already been foreclosed upon, most of them are in some type of foreclosure proceeding
[01:23:47.240 --> 01:23:56.240]  If you are, if somebody is in the foreclosure proceedings they need to sue the bank immediately, that's what will stop the foreclosure proceedings
[01:23:56.240 --> 01:24:07.240]  And you would do a, I've heard once you start a suit you have to consolidate the cases somehow, is that like a certain writ that you do to consolidate?
[01:24:07.240 --> 01:24:09.240]  I don't know what you mean
[01:24:09.240 --> 01:24:11.240]  There's a writ I can't remember
[01:24:11.240 --> 01:24:18.240]  I don't know what you mean by consolidate a case, I mean if, you would just file a lawsuit as a plaintiff
[01:24:18.240 --> 01:24:26.240]  Well because I think at least what's happening here in California is they're foreclosing, well start off non-judicial
[01:24:26.240 --> 01:24:35.240]  If you start a fight with them or you respond to their unlawful detainers which is basically a court summary judgment
[01:24:35.240 --> 01:24:41.240]  If you basically deny them and admit to them and you tell them that there's fraud involved
[01:24:41.240 --> 01:24:49.240]  It's basically, it's slowing them down but it's not stopping them so we're thinking of doing a, instead of another court
[01:24:49.240 --> 01:24:55.240]  Because a unlawful detainer is a specific court, it's kind of like family court, they can only do unlawful detainers
[01:24:55.240 --> 01:25:03.240]  Those certain judges that can only do certain things and this, and so what happened was they had to take you outside of that court
[01:25:03.240 --> 01:25:06.240]  And push you into another court to do a jury trial
[01:25:06.240 --> 01:25:12.240]  And what we're thinking about doing is maybe going to like a federal court or the Supreme Court in California
[01:25:12.240 --> 01:25:16.240]  Which is in San Francisco now, they used to have one in Los Angeles, they closed it down
[01:25:16.240 --> 01:25:24.240]  And now there's only one court now in San Francisco and so if you have two separate court cases there's a writ where you can
[01:25:24.240 --> 01:25:30.240]  Oh I see what you're saying, I think, why don't you call back in on Thursday night for Randy to answer some of these kinds of questions
[01:25:30.240 --> 01:25:33.240]  Because I don't think that's the way he approaches it
[01:25:33.240 --> 01:25:42.240]  But I do know that if somebody is in a foreclosure proceeding already, they need to sue the bank immediately to stop the foreclosure proceedings
[01:25:42.240 --> 01:25:49.240]  And he would be able to give you more information about that because that's what he's doing right now, he's giving a seminar about this exact issue
[01:25:49.240 --> 01:25:52.240]  Yeah, is he going to have another one soon?
[01:25:52.240 --> 01:25:56.240]  He's doing seminars all over the place, in fact he's in California right now
[01:25:56.240 --> 01:26:01.240]  Why don't you send him an email, go to, he's in San Diego right now I believe
[01:26:01.240 --> 01:26:10.240]  So why don't, go to ruleoflawradio.com and click on the contact button and send Randy an email
[01:26:10.240 --> 01:26:17.240]  And maybe you can get him to come because, where are you located right now?
[01:26:17.240 --> 01:26:24.240]  Well we're in Los Angeles, I'm in Los Angeles but the lawsuit that we're going to do is people throughout the county
[01:26:24.240 --> 01:26:28.240]  It's not, I'm in West LA but there's some people on Riverside and some people on
[01:26:28.240 --> 01:26:33.240]  I think he's actually planning on being in Los Angeles while he's out there
[01:26:33.240 --> 01:26:38.240]  So definitely send him an email and call back in on Thursday night if you would
[01:26:38.240 --> 01:26:42.240]  So he can a little bit better answer the questions, I'm sorry he's not here tonight
[01:26:42.240 --> 01:26:53.240]  It's okay, I think you've basically reaffirmed what my belief was that we need to really sue them instead of playing their little game
[01:26:53.240 --> 01:26:58.240]  Yeah you need to sue them, you need to have a forensic mortgage audit done first off the bat
[01:26:58.240 --> 01:27:04.240]  That's the first thing that needs to happen is that you find out what the violations are
[01:27:04.240 --> 01:27:09.240]  Yes and if you really think about it the banks, they do a true audit
[01:27:09.240 --> 01:27:14.240]  I'm thinking you really would have to subpoena in a court
[01:27:14.240 --> 01:27:19.240]  No, you don't have to subpoena anything, you have copies of the mortgage papers
[01:27:19.240 --> 01:27:23.240]  You get copies of everything when you take out a mortgage
[01:27:23.240 --> 01:27:27.240]  All right, people should be holding on to those documents
[01:27:27.240 --> 01:27:32.240]  If not then you don't have to subpoena anything, you just go to the bank and ask them to copy the mortgage file
[01:27:32.240 --> 01:27:35.240]  You go to a loan officer, you don't have to subpoena anything
[01:27:35.240 --> 01:27:41.240]  You just get a copy of all the mortgage documents and then Randy can do a forensic mortgage audit
[01:27:41.240 --> 01:27:46.240]  No she did hire someone, that was one of the first things she did was a forensic audit
[01:27:46.240 --> 01:27:52.240]  There's a guy here in California, I can't remember his name but he does something similar but here in California
[01:27:52.240 --> 01:27:57.240]  And that's actually what's saving them really is they did that and they claim the fraud
[01:27:57.240 --> 01:28:01.240]  So basically it sounds like he's doing what we're doing here in California
[01:28:01.240 --> 01:28:05.240]  But he's I guess educating the people in Southern California
[01:28:05.240 --> 01:28:14.240]  Los Angeles sounds like we're very close to what he's doing
[01:28:14.240 --> 01:28:17.240]  Yes, and Randy's not an attorney, we're not attorneys here
[01:28:17.240 --> 01:28:22.240]  We do things pro se and we help teach other people how to do things pro se
[01:28:22.240 --> 01:28:24.240]  Yeah, we're the same
[01:28:24.240 --> 01:28:28.240]  One other thing, I heard of Dr. Livingston, have you heard of him?
[01:28:28.240 --> 01:28:31.240]  He's had something called the ultimate lawsuit
[01:28:31.240 --> 01:28:40.240]  I thought he stood out because he really has these pleadings and he said he did like a thousand page pleading
[01:28:40.240 --> 01:28:46.240]  I mean that's a little overbearing for me but do you think that we would also be a
[01:28:46.240 --> 01:28:51.240]  I don't know who he is, I haven't heard of him, have you heard of him Randy?
[01:28:51.240 --> 01:28:54.240]  I mean I'm sorry, Eddie have you heard of him?
[01:28:54.240 --> 01:28:56.240]  No ma'am I have not
[01:28:56.240 --> 01:29:02.240]  I recommend Jurisdictionary to teach people how to file lawsuits and how to deal with lawsuits
[01:29:02.240 --> 01:29:08.240]  Okay so I'll review my Jurisdictionary, it's been a while since I've reviewed that and then I'll email Randy
[01:29:08.240 --> 01:29:11.240]  and hopefully we can maybe
[01:29:11.240 --> 01:29:18.240]  And Randy's other website that deals with the mortgages issue is remediesinrealestate.com
[01:29:18.240 --> 01:29:23.240]  and there's a phone number, he's got his office phone number posted on that website
[01:29:23.240 --> 01:29:27.240]  remediesinrealestate.com
[01:29:27.240 --> 01:29:30.240]  Okay
[01:29:30.240 --> 01:29:33.240]  Okay?
[01:29:33.240 --> 01:29:37.240]  Alright well thank you Anthony, thank you very much for calling in
[01:29:37.240 --> 01:29:38.240]  Thank you too, take care
[01:29:38.240 --> 01:29:42.240]  Okay when we get back on the other side we're going to go to Terry in Michigan
[01:29:42.240 --> 01:29:47.240]  After that the phone lines are wide open, we've got a half an hour left so folks if you'd like to call in
[01:29:47.240 --> 01:29:55.240]  512-646-1984 that's 512-646-1984 we'll be right back
[01:30:00.240 --> 01:30:06.240]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM but finding things on the internet isn't so easy
[01:30:06.240 --> 01:30:09.240]  and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with
[01:30:09.240 --> 01:30:12.240]  Oh well I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books then
[01:30:12.240 --> 01:30:13.240]  Brave New Books?
[01:30:13.240 --> 01:30:20.240]  Yes, Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul and G. Edward Griffin
[01:30:20.240 --> 01:30:24.240]  They even stock Interfood, Berkey Products and Calvin Soaps
[01:30:24.240 --> 01:30:26.240]  There's no way a place like that exists
[01:30:26.240 --> 01:30:32.240]  Go check it out for yourself, it's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street just south of UT
[01:30:32.240 --> 01:30:36.240]  Oh by UT, there's never anywhere to park down there
[01:30:36.240 --> 01:30:43.240]  Actually they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility just behind the bookstore
[01:30:43.240 --> 01:30:47.240]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:30:47.240 --> 01:30:52.240]  Monday through Saturday, 11 AM to 9 PM and 1 to 6 PM on Sundays
[01:30:52.240 --> 01:30:59.240]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503 or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com
[01:30:59.240 --> 01:31:05.240]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters or even lawsuits?
[01:31:05.240 --> 01:31:09.240]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method
[01:31:09.240 --> 01:31:15.240]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two
[01:31:15.240 --> 01:31:21.240]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes
[01:31:21.240 --> 01:31:25.240]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail or court summons
[01:31:25.240 --> 01:31:27.240]  How to answer letters and phone calls
[01:31:27.240 --> 01:31:29.240]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report
[01:31:29.240 --> 01:31:34.240]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[01:31:34.240 --> 01:31:39.240]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors
[01:31:39.240 --> 01:31:41.240]  Personal consultation is available as well
[01:31:41.240 --> 01:31:47.240]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner
[01:31:47.240 --> 01:31:50.240]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com
[01:31:50.240 --> 01:31:58.240]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email michaelmears at yahoo.com
[01:31:58.240 --> 01:32:27.240]  Learn how to stop debt collectors now
[01:32:27.240 --> 01:32:30.240]  Okay, folks, this is the rule of law
[01:32:30.240 --> 01:32:33.240]  Randy Kelton, Craig, Deborah Stevens
[01:32:33.240 --> 01:32:36.240]  Randy has the evening off from the radio show tonight
[01:32:36.240 --> 01:32:43.240]  He is on seminar and we're taking your calls, 512-646-1984
[01:32:43.240 --> 01:32:51.240]  If you just want to listen, please call 512-485-9010
[01:32:51.240 --> 01:32:55.240]  The 1984 number is just for people who want to call and talk in the air
[01:32:55.240 --> 01:32:59.240]  It helps tremendously if folks call the listen line who just want to listen
[01:32:59.240 --> 01:33:03.240]  Because that keeps the call board freed up and it keeps us from getting confused
[01:33:03.240 --> 01:33:08.240]  So, folks, if you've called in already, please don't just stay on the line
[01:33:08.240 --> 01:33:11.240]  The 1984 number after we are done talking with you
[01:33:11.240 --> 01:33:15.240]  Because that gets really confusing for us because we think we have another caller on the board
[01:33:15.240 --> 01:33:24.240]  So please hang up and listen to the stream or the FMAM or call 512-485-9010 if you just want to listen
[01:33:24.240 --> 01:33:28.240]  All right, we're going to Terry in Michigan now
[01:33:28.240 --> 01:33:31.240]  Terry, thanks for calling in. What's on your mind tonight?
[01:33:31.240 --> 01:33:33.240]  Hi, how's it going?
[01:33:33.240 --> 01:33:35.240]  It's going pretty good
[01:33:35.240 --> 01:33:38.240]  Good. I think this is for Eddie
[01:33:38.240 --> 01:33:44.240]  I just moved and I went down to change my ID card, the address and stuff
[01:33:44.240 --> 01:33:50.240]  And right away the first thing they did was shove a voter registration in front of me
[01:33:50.240 --> 01:33:57.240]  And it seems like I recall hearing in the past that when you're dealing with property taxes
[01:33:57.240 --> 01:34:03.240]  That if you're a registered voter, you're kind of at a disadvantage
[01:34:03.240 --> 01:34:07.240]  I don't know. Do you remember what that was about or how that works?
[01:34:07.240 --> 01:34:12.240]  Because you're certifying you're a resident and or a U.S. citizen
[01:34:12.240 --> 01:34:20.240]  What I do on the voter card when I do it is I scratched out U.S. and put in American
[01:34:20.240 --> 01:34:29.240]  And then right after that, I put slash Texan, Texan National
[01:34:29.240 --> 01:34:36.240]  And basically anywhere where it had U.S. citizen, I altered it in that regard
[01:34:36.240 --> 01:34:44.240]  Okay. So my basic thing to do would be mark American and then Michigan National
[01:34:44.240 --> 01:34:46.240]  Correct
[01:34:46.240 --> 01:34:48.240]  Okay. Yeah, because I
[01:34:48.240 --> 01:34:53.240]  And then wherever it says voter, change that to elector
[01:34:53.240 --> 01:35:02.240]  Oh, okay. Yeah, and when I went to do that, I said, you know what?
[01:35:02.240 --> 01:35:09.240]  I think I'm going to make a call and see if I really want to fill that out or sign it
[01:35:09.240 --> 01:35:14.240]  Because I know when you go down and deal with these people with your property tax
[01:35:14.240 --> 01:35:18.240]  It's like, boy, they just treat you like some
[01:35:18.240 --> 01:35:23.240]  Well, they're going to do that anyway because they think they're all that in a bag of chips
[01:35:23.240 --> 01:35:29.240]  But until you teach them otherwise, they're going to maintain the status quo on that
[01:35:29.240 --> 01:35:34.240]  I've gone through several times. I always go down and fight my taxes
[01:35:34.240 --> 01:35:42.240]  And I even went and got certified as an appraiser and went in and they said, yeah, thank you very much
[01:35:42.240 --> 01:35:46.240]  You know, too bad we're raising your taxes anyway
[01:35:46.240 --> 01:35:52.240]  Yeah. Well, I don't know what the voter registration card looks like in the air and up in Michigan
[01:35:52.240 --> 01:35:56.240]  But check and see also if it says resident anywhere
[01:35:56.240 --> 01:36:04.240]  And if it does that, then I replace resident with domiciled
[01:36:04.240 --> 01:36:13.240]  Okay. All right. Well, that's a thing to do then
[01:36:13.240 --> 01:36:20.240]  The reason I do that is because resident is very clear in law. It is somewhat temporary or transient
[01:36:20.240 --> 01:36:28.240]  It is by no means a domiciled permanent inhabitant, but even an inhabitant, believe it or not
[01:36:28.240 --> 01:36:34.240]  Under the law dictionaries has a transient term associated with it
[01:36:34.240 --> 01:36:42.240]  Domiciled is the only one I can find that actually apprises it as to being permanent
[01:36:42.240 --> 01:36:52.240]  Okay. So when you go to fight your taxes and you show them that that's the way you signed up
[01:36:52.240 --> 01:36:56.240]  Then that's going to make a difference with them trying to deal with it
[01:36:56.240 --> 01:37:00.240]  It should because if you look at the laws, it's going to deal with real property
[01:37:00.240 --> 01:37:04.240]  It never deals with private property. It deals with real property
[01:37:04.240 --> 01:37:09.240]  It deals with personal property, but none of that is private property
[01:37:09.240 --> 01:37:16.240]  Plus almost always you will see two other terms that are interrelated in that tax liability
[01:37:16.240 --> 01:37:25.240]  Resident or person, and either one of those is sometimes parlayed into the term taxpayer
[01:37:25.240 --> 01:37:33.240]  You need to make sure as the rabbit trail goes that you are not any of those things as they are defined
[01:37:33.240 --> 01:37:36.240]  And you need to point that out to them
[01:37:36.240 --> 01:37:52.240]  Okay. Okay, so if I haven't signed up their vote yet, then there's not really much they can do so I do
[01:37:52.240 --> 01:37:59.240]  Yes and no. They're still going to move against your property because your property is on the tax roll
[01:37:59.240 --> 01:38:02.240]  Whether you are or not
[01:38:02.240 --> 01:38:04.240]  Okay
[01:38:04.240 --> 01:38:13.240]  So the first thing you need to be looking at is how to get your property off of that tax roll
[01:38:13.240 --> 01:38:41.240]  Now is this the main thing to do or if we start getting into the different classification there with the property
[01:38:41.240 --> 01:38:47.240]  Now I can't think of that, but all right, I guess I'll have to work on that
[01:38:47.240 --> 01:38:51.240]  But I remember you guys had talked about it before and you said in Texas you can't do it
[01:38:51.240 --> 01:38:58.240]  But in most of the other states you can classify your property different than
[01:38:58.240 --> 01:39:03.240]  Well if you can get your property classified as private property instead of real property
[01:39:03.240 --> 01:39:06.240]  Then you can get it deleted from the tax roll
[01:39:06.240 --> 01:39:07.240]  Oh really
[01:39:07.240 --> 01:39:11.240]  And that's something that I've been trying to research getting done
[01:39:11.240 --> 01:39:15.240]  There's a gentleman that apparently teaches people how to do this
[01:39:15.240 --> 01:39:19.240]  And I've been trying to get him on the show, but he hasn't responded to my emails for a while
[01:39:19.240 --> 01:39:21.240]  I think he's very, very busy
[01:39:21.240 --> 01:39:32.240]  But basically what you have to do is you ask for a list of all the public property in the county from the appraisal district
[01:39:32.240 --> 01:39:39.240]  And then you verify that your property is not on that list by writing them yet another letter
[01:39:39.240 --> 01:39:44.240]  And getting them to confirm that your property is not on the list of public property
[01:39:44.240 --> 01:39:48.240]  And then when they do that, then you ask them to reclassify your property as private property
[01:39:48.240 --> 01:39:54.240]  They won't do that, so then what you do is you have to sue the appraisal district in district court
[01:39:54.240 --> 01:40:01.240]  And get the judge to reclassify your property as private property and then you can get it off the tax roll
[01:40:01.240 --> 01:40:07.240]  And I'm not clear on all the steps or what exactly the content of the suit should be and these kinds of things
[01:40:07.240 --> 01:40:14.240]  But if you get your only real property can be taxed with property taxes, at least here in Texas
[01:40:14.240 --> 01:40:18.240]  And so you get it reclassified to private property and then you can get it off the tax roll
[01:40:18.240 --> 01:40:24.240]  And actually that's what one of our listeners did in South Texas, Pat and Metta
[01:40:24.240 --> 01:40:28.240]  They got their properties reclassified to private property
[01:40:28.240 --> 01:40:34.240]  But in their county, their property taxes are only like 30 bucks a year, so it's like no big deal
[01:40:34.240 --> 01:40:45.240]  But here in Travis County, especially in our area of town, I mean, we've got our taxes are over 4 grand this year for our property
[01:40:45.240 --> 01:40:48.240]  I mean, it's outrageous. It'll be 5 grand the following year
[01:40:48.240 --> 01:40:55.240]  And so there's such a huge revenue scheme going on for Austin Independent School District that
[01:40:55.240 --> 01:41:01.240]  And I know somebody who works for the school board
[01:41:01.240 --> 01:41:09.240]  And she said most of the money that is collected by property taxes goes to pay outrageous salaries
[01:41:09.240 --> 01:41:12.240]  She works for the state comptroller's office actually
[01:41:12.240 --> 01:41:16.240]  And she's seen all the expenditures for all these school districts
[01:41:16.240 --> 01:41:18.240]  And she says in Travis County, it's so corrupt
[01:41:18.240 --> 01:41:28.240]  What most of the money goes to is to pay outrageously high salaries for the superintendents of the school districts
[01:41:28.240 --> 01:41:32.240]  I mean, we're talking in the hundreds of thousands of dollars
[01:41:32.240 --> 01:41:38.240]  And then meanwhile the teachers get a pittance and the schools aren't properly maintained
[01:41:38.240 --> 01:41:43.240]  And then of course the children are indoctrinated with government propaganda
[01:41:43.240 --> 01:41:45.240]  So it's just a horrible situation
[01:41:45.240 --> 01:41:49.240]  And I don't appreciate having to fund it, okay?
[01:41:49.240 --> 01:41:56.240]  And so that's one thing that I intend on eventually doing something about once I get some time
[01:41:56.240 --> 01:42:00.240]  Now how would the private property thing tie in with land patents?
[01:42:00.240 --> 01:42:04.240]  It does not. We had a whole show on that
[01:42:04.240 --> 01:42:08.240]  Land patents will not get you out of property taxes
[01:42:08.240 --> 01:42:15.240]  Having a land patent will not help you reclassify your property from real property to private property
[01:42:15.240 --> 01:42:18.240]  They're two totally separate things
[01:42:18.240 --> 01:42:27.240]  And I forgot the gentleman who has the land patent website, Team Law, teamlaw.org
[01:42:27.240 --> 01:42:29.240]  He makes it very clear
[01:42:29.240 --> 01:42:36.240]  The only reason that he does the land patents is to help people get set up as constitutional electors
[01:42:36.240 --> 01:42:42.240]  And to me it's kind of, I don't know, I'm not so sure I agree with what he does
[01:42:42.240 --> 01:42:45.240]  Let's just put it that way
[01:42:45.240 --> 01:42:47.240]  Because it seems somewhat subversive to me
[01:42:47.240 --> 01:42:49.240]  But that's just my opinion
[01:42:49.240 --> 01:42:54.240]  But the bottom line is this and he says it on his website and he said it on the show many times
[01:42:54.240 --> 01:42:58.240]  Having your land patent has nothing to do with property taxes
[01:42:58.240 --> 01:43:00.240]  It will not get you out of property taxes
[01:43:00.240 --> 01:43:05.240]  It will not help you get your property reclassified from real property to private property
[01:43:05.240 --> 01:43:07.240]  So just don't even go there
[01:43:07.240 --> 01:43:15.240]  Don't even bother with the land patents unless you're into his trip concerning becoming a constitutional elector
[01:43:15.240 --> 01:43:19.240]  And they've got their own governors that they've elected and all these kinds of things
[01:43:19.240 --> 01:43:21.240]  And I don't know what they intend to do with it
[01:43:21.240 --> 01:43:27.240]  I mean, do they intend on using the militias to enforce their government that they've elected?
[01:43:27.240 --> 01:43:29.240]  I don't know, that's why I don't agree with it
[01:43:29.240 --> 01:43:32.240]  But at any rate, that's the deal with the land patents
[01:43:32.240 --> 01:43:34.240]  So I say don't bother
[01:43:34.240 --> 01:43:37.240]  It's not going to help you practically in the real world
[01:43:40.240 --> 01:43:42.240]  All right, Terry, thanks for calling in
[01:43:42.240 --> 01:43:43.240]  All right, thank you
[01:43:43.240 --> 01:43:44.240]  Thank you
[01:43:44.240 --> 01:43:47.240]  Okay, when we get back we're going to go to Danny in Texas
[01:43:47.240 --> 01:43:50.240]  Folks, we only have one more segment left
[01:43:50.240 --> 01:43:51.240]  This is the rule of law
[01:43:51.240 --> 01:43:53.240]  Randy Kelton is on seminar
[01:43:53.240 --> 01:43:55.240]  We've got Eddie Craig and Deborah Stevens
[01:43:55.240 --> 01:44:06.240]  We'll be right back
[01:44:06.240 --> 01:44:11.240]  Aerial spraying, chemtrails, the modified atmosphere
[01:44:11.240 --> 01:44:18.240]  Heavy metals and pesticides, carcinogens and chemical fibers all falling from the sky
[01:44:18.240 --> 01:44:21.240]  You have a choice to keep your body clean
[01:44:21.240 --> 01:44:26.240]  Detoxify with micro plant powder from hempusa.org
[01:44:26.240 --> 01:44:31.240]  Or call 908-691-2608
[01:44:31.240 --> 01:44:35.240]  It's odorless and tasteless and used in any liquid or food
[01:44:35.240 --> 01:44:39.240]  Protect your family now with micro plant powder
[01:44:39.240 --> 01:44:43.240]  Cleaning out heavy metals, parasites and toxins
[01:44:43.240 --> 01:44:48.240]  Order it now for daily intake and stock it now for long term storage
[01:44:48.240 --> 01:44:55.240]  Visit hempusa.org or call 908-691-2608 today
[01:45:07.240 --> 01:45:08.240]  Hello
[01:45:09.240 --> 01:45:11.240]  Oh man, you're in jail
[01:45:12.240 --> 01:45:13.240]  You got busted, man
[01:45:13.240 --> 01:45:23.240]  Okay folks, we're back, we're taking your calls
[01:45:23.240 --> 01:45:25.240]  We've got Danny from Texas
[01:45:25.240 --> 01:45:27.240]  Danny, thanks for calling in
[01:45:27.240 --> 01:45:28.240]  What is on your mind tonight?
[01:45:28.240 --> 01:45:32.240]  Just calling to give a little something to Eddie
[01:45:32.240 --> 01:45:35.240]  He was talking about the petition for removal earlier
[01:45:35.240 --> 01:45:39.240]  I was researching that some year or two ago
[01:45:39.240 --> 01:45:45.240]  And I had the idea of going and getting some of the pleadings that had previously been filed
[01:45:45.240 --> 01:45:52.240]  Or those kinds of things to see the right way to do it or the way that it's been accepted before
[01:45:52.240 --> 01:45:54.240]  You didn't find any, did you?
[01:45:54.240 --> 01:45:56.240]  Yeah, I did, several
[01:45:56.240 --> 01:45:57.240]  Oh
[01:45:57.240 --> 01:46:02.240]  Yeah, you go look in the annotated statutes and you get the annotations
[01:46:02.240 --> 01:46:05.240]  And you get some cases related to that topic
[01:46:05.240 --> 01:46:07.240]  So that's where I started
[01:46:07.240 --> 01:46:11.240]  And so I found particular cases from that
[01:46:11.240 --> 01:46:15.240]  And then contacted the clerk of the court there to get that
[01:46:15.240 --> 01:46:20.240]  So one was from against the sheriff in one of the northern counties
[01:46:20.240 --> 01:46:22.240]  I forgot what it was
[01:46:22.240 --> 01:46:25.240]  But yeah, well at the time they put this in though
[01:46:25.240 --> 01:46:28.240]  He was already under indictment for a number of things
[01:46:28.240 --> 01:46:31.240]  So I don't think he survived the petition
[01:46:31.240 --> 01:46:37.240]  But in that he had torched somebody's car
[01:46:37.240 --> 01:46:46.240]  And he was sending extra patrols through this apartment complex
[01:46:46.240 --> 01:46:51.240]  Where he had to live without paying any rent
[01:46:51.240 --> 01:46:55.240]  So that was part of the things they complained about in there
[01:46:55.240 --> 01:47:03.240]  And then in the 90s there were two in Harris County, one against the county judge and one against the DA
[01:47:03.240 --> 01:47:07.240]  I don't remember if either of those succeeded but they were filed there
[01:47:07.240 --> 01:47:12.240]  And the one that did succeed was against the DA in Fort Bend County
[01:47:12.240 --> 01:47:18.240]  And so I went there and looked through that file and got a copy of the petition
[01:47:18.240 --> 01:47:22.240]  But that original petition had over 100 signers on it
[01:47:22.240 --> 01:47:27.240]  So like Randy or somebody has said
[01:47:27.240 --> 01:47:30.240]  A lot of these things can't really do it, it's just law
[01:47:30.240 --> 01:47:32.240]  It's got to become kind of political
[01:47:32.240 --> 01:47:34.240]  So when you get 100 people willing to put their name down
[01:47:34.240 --> 01:47:36.240]  That's getting kind of political
[01:47:36.240 --> 01:47:41.240]  But some accusations against him, I don't remember all of it
[01:47:41.240 --> 01:47:44.240]  But part of it he was harboring a fugitive from justice
[01:47:44.240 --> 01:47:49.240]  Married a woman who was involved in some bank fraud or something
[01:47:49.240 --> 01:47:53.240]  And I don't know if she was hiding from the feds or what it was exactly now
[01:47:53.240 --> 01:47:59.240]  But some of this had some good interesting reading
[01:47:59.240 --> 01:48:04.240]  And I think I got copies of these in my computer, I could send them to you if you'd like
[01:48:04.240 --> 01:48:05.240]  Sure
[01:48:05.240 --> 01:48:09.240]  Okay, I'll do that, just want to pass that on to you
[01:48:09.240 --> 01:48:11.240]  Alright, I appreciate it
[01:48:11.240 --> 01:48:12.240]  Okay
[01:48:12.240 --> 01:48:16.240]  Yes, I'm always interested in reading anything that will increase my level of knowledge
[01:48:16.240 --> 01:48:21.240]  Regarding what we can do to them
[01:48:21.240 --> 01:48:22.240]  Yeah
[01:48:22.240 --> 01:48:27.240]  And suggestions on how to make it happen
[01:48:27.240 --> 01:48:30.240]  Okay, I just want to let you know about that
[01:48:30.240 --> 01:48:35.240]  Alright, well thank you much Danny
[01:48:35.240 --> 01:48:36.240]  Alright, thanks Danny
[01:48:36.240 --> 01:48:44.240]  Callers, we've got open phone lines 512-646-1984
[01:48:44.240 --> 01:48:48.240]  Alright, so we do have open phone lines, there's no callers on the board
[01:48:48.240 --> 01:48:50.240]  We've got about 10 minutes left
[01:48:50.240 --> 01:48:55.240]  So Eddie, why don't you tell us a little bit about these updates to the traffic seminar materials
[01:48:55.240 --> 01:48:57.240]  That you've got coming out soon
[01:48:57.240 --> 01:49:08.240]  Okay, I have been breaking my brain trying to get a complete set of motions from beginning to end
[01:49:08.240 --> 01:49:18.240]  Right up a complete step-by-step procedural process for how a traffic case usually flows from the moment of the stop
[01:49:18.240 --> 01:49:21.240]  Up to the time you appear in court
[01:49:21.240 --> 01:49:26.240]  I'm trying to make this as effortless as possible for educational purposes
[01:49:26.240 --> 01:49:31.240]  That does not mean you won't have to do some work, it does not mean you won't have to do some reading
[01:49:31.240 --> 01:49:38.240]  But for the most part it will already be laid out for you to learn and to use
[01:49:38.240 --> 01:49:45.240]  Now one very important aspect of dealing with these things is that no checklist is going to do the job
[01:49:45.240 --> 01:49:48.240]  You have to learn to think on your feet
[01:49:48.240 --> 01:49:53.240]  You have to learn how to address a dynamic and fluid situation
[01:49:53.240 --> 01:49:59.240]  If you can't do that, then it's time to start practicing and learning how
[01:49:59.240 --> 01:50:02.240]  Because these things are never set in stone
[01:50:02.240 --> 01:50:10.240]  There is no hard-coded step-by-step that's going to work in every case in every court with every judge
[01:50:10.240 --> 01:50:11.240]  It's just not
[01:50:11.240 --> 01:50:16.240]  The main reason being is that one judge may be willing to follow the law
[01:50:16.240 --> 01:50:20.240]  The other one may be completely unwilling to even acknowledge it exists
[01:50:20.240 --> 01:50:26.240]  And so you have to learn how to deal with those situations when they arise
[01:50:26.240 --> 01:50:31.240]  But we have a complete list of motions that we're going to be dealing with
[01:50:31.240 --> 01:50:38.240]  And I'll give you a quick example here of just which ones I've got done so far and the ones I'm still working on
[01:50:38.240 --> 01:50:47.240]  But right now we have ten pretrials and one after-the-fact pretrial along with some motions to disqualify
[01:50:47.240 --> 01:50:49.240]  Of which there are seven additional
[01:50:49.240 --> 01:50:52.240]  So right now you're talking 18 different motions
[01:50:52.240 --> 01:50:58.240]  The very first motion that you file at pretrial is your fair and impartial trial
[01:50:58.240 --> 01:51:00.240]  You file a motion for assistance of counsel
[01:51:00.240 --> 01:51:05.240]  You file a motion to dismiss for the citation not being a valid complaint
[01:51:05.240 --> 01:51:08.240]  You file a petition for the prosecutor to show authority
[01:51:08.240 --> 01:51:12.240]  You file a motion to dismiss under the Administrative Procedures Act
[01:51:12.240 --> 01:51:15.240]  You file a petition to demand a court of record
[01:51:15.240 --> 01:51:18.240]  You file a motion to dismiss no information
[01:51:18.240 --> 01:51:24.240]  A petition to provide a copy of indictment and information and no, they are not the same motion
[01:51:24.240 --> 01:51:27.240]  A petition for nature and cause of accusation
[01:51:27.240 --> 01:51:31.240]  A petition for the court to follow Texas Code of Criminal Procedure
[01:51:31.240 --> 01:51:35.240]  A petition for findings of facts and conclusions of law
[01:51:35.240 --> 01:51:40.240]  That is the one that you file after the judge blanket denies all the others
[01:51:40.240 --> 01:51:46.240]  That petition for finding of facts and conclusions of law is your arguments as to by what authority
[01:51:46.240 --> 01:51:54.240]  And by what statutory provision does this court dismiss without any review whatsoever
[01:51:54.240 --> 01:51:59.240]  The properly and timely filed motions of the defense
[01:51:59.240 --> 01:52:06.240]  What gave you that authority and what law are you using to make the determination you made in denying it
[01:52:06.240 --> 01:52:12.240]  We are basically going to build a paper trail under which we can bury these people
[01:52:12.240 --> 01:52:18.240]  Now folks this is going to be very important for this upcoming meeting with the legislature
[01:52:18.240 --> 01:52:22.240]  Every one of you that uses these documents in Texas
[01:52:22.240 --> 01:52:31.240]  Please, please, please make sure you get copies of the orders after they have been filed and denied by the judge
[01:52:31.240 --> 01:52:39.240]  Whether the judge denies it by signing it as denied or whether they refuse to sign it or even acknowledge the motion
[01:52:39.240 --> 01:52:48.240]  Make sure you get a copy of that and write it up and send it to me via email that here is the motion I filed
[01:52:48.240 --> 01:52:58.240]  The order was denied, they refused to file a finding of facts and conclusions of law on my request to do so
[01:52:58.240 --> 01:53:05.240]  What we want is ammunition to take before the legislature to prove the point of complete and utter abuse
[01:53:05.240 --> 01:53:10.240]  And corruption by the justices and the magistrates in Texas
[01:53:10.240 --> 01:53:14.240]  And folks we're not going to do it without your help
[01:53:14.240 --> 01:53:20.240]  I could fight a hundred battles a day and that won't be enough because I'm only one source
[01:53:20.240 --> 01:53:28.240]  We need to make this as diversified by persons, locations, counties, cities, you name it
[01:53:28.240 --> 01:53:32.240]  We want them from all over Texas where they're doing this
[01:53:32.240 --> 01:53:38.240]  Because when we stand in front of them down there and say you have judges all over the state that are doing this
[01:53:38.240 --> 01:53:43.240]  Knowingly and willingly, I want to be able to back that up with hard documentation
[01:53:43.240 --> 01:53:50.240]  So please help me out with that and if you use these motions, please make sure that you get copies of the orders
[01:53:50.240 --> 01:53:54.240]  Especially the fair and impartial trial
[01:53:54.240 --> 01:54:02.240]  If that gets denied, you immediately demand a signed copy of that order and you do two things with that signed copy
[01:54:02.240 --> 01:54:11.240]  You get a certified copy, you make additional copies of it, you take it right off the bat to the mayor and the city manager
[01:54:11.240 --> 01:54:21.240]  And you inform them that here is a signed order denying you the right of a fair and impartial trial by the judge of such and such court
[01:54:21.240 --> 01:54:26.240]  I will be sending a tort letter to you tomorrow with this as an attachment
[01:54:26.240 --> 01:54:32.240]  In the meantime, you better be figuring out what you're going to be doing about this judge
[01:54:32.240 --> 01:54:38.240]  You throw them into such a panic they have to go home and shovel out their pants
[01:54:38.240 --> 01:54:42.240]  Okay, Eddie
[01:54:42.240 --> 01:54:44.240]  And you went to imagery
[01:54:44.240 --> 01:54:50.240]  Yeah, well, the point being we want to put the fear of the people back into these public servants
[01:54:50.240 --> 01:54:51.240]  I call them public servants
[01:54:51.240 --> 01:54:58.240]  Right now they don't fear us, yeah, they don't fear us, they don't respect us, they believe themselves superior and above us
[01:54:58.240 --> 01:55:11.240]  We need to fix that quickly and we can do it best by puncturing their helium-filled heads that's got them floating so high
[01:55:11.240 --> 01:55:13.240]  So let's work on doing that
[01:55:13.240 --> 01:55:16.240]  The helium-filled heads of the public servants
[01:55:16.240 --> 01:55:18.240]  That's it
[01:55:18.240 --> 01:55:24.240]  Okay, well, Eddie, let me ask you a question here concerning my friend's traffic case that I've been helping him with
[01:55:24.240 --> 01:55:29.240]  And you already answered this for him, but I wanted to ask the question on the air because the listeners are likely to come up against this
[01:55:29.240 --> 01:55:37.240]  All right, he's filed a notice of appeal and his 17.02 code of criminal procedure bail has been denied
[01:55:37.240 --> 01:55:47.240]  Which is the constitutional bail bond which basically you submit an affidavit saying that your net worth is at least as much or more as the amount of the bond
[01:55:47.240 --> 01:55:56.240]  You don't have to pay the bond in cash, you can pay it in cash if you opt to, but the judges cannot require you to
[01:55:56.240 --> 01:56:02.240]  Well, the judge is trying to require him to do that, he wouldn't do that, the constitutional bail bond was denied
[01:56:02.240 --> 01:56:09.240]  And instead they're trying to get him to fill out this indigency affidavit paperwork
[01:56:09.240 --> 01:56:14.240]  And so he just sent him a tax return and says I don't need you guys to do my profit and loss statement for me
[01:56:14.240 --> 01:56:21.240]  Well, at any rate, it's kind of at a stalemate right now, the case isn't going anywhere because he can't push the appeal through
[01:56:21.240 --> 01:56:27.240]  Until either the indigency paperwork gets approved or he gets his bail bond
[01:56:27.240 --> 01:56:37.240]  Well, at any rate, in the meantime, the court has reported to the DPS office this ticket and so now his insurance rates are becoming affected
[01:56:37.240 --> 01:56:44.240]  So what is the remedy here because I know that in a lot of times in criminal cases, like if somebody is convicted of a crime
[01:56:44.240 --> 01:56:47.240]  They still go to prison while they're waiting for their appeal
[01:56:47.240 --> 01:56:56.240]  And so I don't know if it's lawful for them to go ahead and report this ticket to the DPS and then it will get pulled after the appeal goes through
[01:56:56.240 --> 01:57:00.240]  If he wins the appeal or what is the deal with that and what's the solution here?
[01:57:00.240 --> 01:57:07.240]  Well, the problem they face in these particular types of criminal cases is this is a fine-only offense
[01:57:07.240 --> 01:57:17.240]  So when they report that you've been convicted for the sole purpose of increasing your rates in order to force you to pay
[01:57:17.240 --> 01:57:24.240]  While it's still being sent through the appeals process, that right there is a problem
[01:57:24.240 --> 01:57:37.240]  Because that shows an intentional act by these judges to extort the money from you in order to prevent them reporting it
[01:57:37.240 --> 01:57:40.240]  In such a way as to cause your rates to go up immediately
[01:57:40.240 --> 01:57:46.240]  This is basically their way of strong-arming you into paying on their schedule and not your own
[01:57:46.240 --> 01:57:50.240]  At least not your own as in relation to your appeal process
[01:57:50.240 --> 01:57:58.240]  Either dropping the appeal or going ahead and paying double the amount of the traffic ticket, cash bond or whatever
[01:57:58.240 --> 01:58:01.240]  And so what should he do?
[01:58:01.240 --> 01:58:07.240]  Well, one of the things that he should do is first thing is I'd get rid of mandamus
[01:58:07.240 --> 01:58:12.240]  I would also file a bar grievance and a judicial conduct complaint in both cases
[01:58:12.240 --> 01:58:14.240]  Against the judge?
[01:58:14.240 --> 01:58:19.240]  Yes, if it's a lower court odds are the judge is an attorney as well as a magistrate
[01:58:19.240 --> 01:58:21.240]  Okay
[01:58:21.240 --> 01:58:23.240]  So I would file both in that regard
[01:58:23.240 --> 01:58:25.240]  Yes, a municipal judge
[01:58:25.240 --> 01:58:30.240]  Exactly, in that case a municipal judge is usually a practicing attorney
[01:58:30.240 --> 01:58:34.240]  All right, all right Eddie, thank you very much
[01:58:34.240 --> 01:58:39.240]  We're at the end of the show, we'll be back Thursday with Randy Kelton
[01:58:39.240 --> 01:58:41.240]  This is the rule of law
[01:58:41.240 --> 01:58:47.240]  Tomorrow night, I am in World Report Radio at 6 p.m. Central Time and Agenda 21 Talk at 8 p.m.
[01:58:47.240 --> 01:58:53.240]  Wednesday night is Outside of the Box Politics with Richard Reeves at 6 p.m. Central
[01:58:53.240 --> 01:59:21.240]  And then of course Radio Free Oklahoma at 8 and we'll see you guys Thursday night
[01:59:23.240 --> 01:59:37.240]  I'm like a stepping grave Watch my big size I'm dangerous I'm dangerous I'm like a stepping grave
[01:59:37.240 --> 01:59:42.240]  But don't fuck with my size I'm dangerous Dangerous
[01:59:42.240 --> 01:59:58.240]  You better treat me good It's a treat, let's move You better treat me good