[00:00.000 --> 00:10.200]  As the oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico grows larger by the hour, Sarah Palin told a Republican
[00:10.200 --> 00:14.960]  audience in Kansas City Saturday the spill was, quote, very tragic, but we've got to
[00:14.960 --> 00:21.280]  tap domestically because energy security will be the key to our prosperity.
[00:21.280 --> 00:26.520]  The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation closed seven more banks Friday, bringing the total
[00:26.520 --> 00:28.520]  to 64 for the year.
[00:28.520 --> 00:32.960]  It cost the agency just over $7 billion.
[00:32.960 --> 00:38.440]  More than 3,000 European Jews, including prominent intellectuals, have signed a petition speaking
[00:38.440 --> 00:43.200]  out against Israeli settlement policies and warning that systematic support for the Israeli
[00:43.200 --> 00:44.680]  government is dangerous.
[00:44.680 --> 00:48.880]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[00:48.880 --> 00:53.240]  Disturbing evidence that honeybees are in terminal decline has emerged from the U.S.,
[00:53.240 --> 00:57.080]  where for the fourth year in a row, more than a third of colonies have failed to survive
[00:57.080 --> 00:58.080]  the winter.
[00:58.080 --> 01:03.400]  The decline of the country's 2.4 million beehives began in 2006, when a phenomenon
[01:03.400 --> 01:08.360]  dubbed colony collapse disorder led to the disappearance of hundreds of thousands of
[01:08.360 --> 01:09.360]  colonies.
[01:09.360 --> 01:13.600]  Since then, more than 3 million colonies in the U.S. and billions of honeybees worldwide
[01:13.600 --> 01:14.600]  have died.
[01:14.600 --> 01:19.040]  The collapse in the global honeybee population is a major threat to crops.
[01:19.040 --> 01:23.600]  It is estimated that a third of everything we eat depends upon honeybee pollination.
[01:23.600 --> 01:30.080]  U.S. scientists have found 121 different pesticides in the samples of bees, wax and pollen, lending
[01:30.080 --> 01:33.280]  credence to the notion that pesticides are a key problem.
[01:33.280 --> 01:38.600]  A review of honeybee deaths by the World Organization for Animal Health last week pointed the finger
[01:38.600 --> 01:49.440]  at the irresponsible use of pesticides.
[01:49.440 --> 01:54.680]  The Pentagon Monday released long-classified statistics about the total size of the U.S.
[01:54.680 --> 01:58.640]  nuclear arsenal, part of an effort to make the case that the country is honoring its
[01:58.640 --> 02:02.200]  treaty commitments to shrink its inventory of weapons.
[02:02.200 --> 02:07.520]  The U.S. initiative is being cast by the White House as a small but significant step toward
[02:07.520 --> 02:12.680]  allowing the world to measure whether Barack Obama makes good on his promise of reducing
[02:12.680 --> 02:15.640]  U.S. reliance on nuclear defense.
[02:15.640 --> 02:20.120]  For years, intelligence officials have objected to publishing numbers of the U.S. nuclear
[02:20.120 --> 02:24.760]  arsenal, concerned that the figures might help terrorist groups calculate the minimum
[02:24.760 --> 02:27.640]  nuclear fuel needed for a weapon.
[02:27.640 --> 02:32.320]  But administration officials said reputable websites that track such issues have long
[02:32.320 --> 02:38.040]  noted that U.S. weapons designers need an average of 8.8 pounds of plutonium.
[02:38.040 --> 02:43.280]  India, Pakistan and Israel, which have all refused to sign the treaty, have not revealed
[02:43.280 --> 02:46.480]  numbers.
[02:46.480 --> 02:50.400]  For more details on these stories, visit www.innworldreport.net.
[02:50.400 --> 03:05.400]  You are listening to the Rule of Law Radio Network at ruleoflawradio.com, live free speech
[03:05.400 --> 03:34.640]  talk radio at its best.
[04:06.280 --> 04:27.020]  What are you going to do when they come for you?
[04:27.020 --> 04:33.940]  Bad boys, bad boys, what are you going to do when we come for you?
[04:33.940 --> 04:48.840]  We've got tools of ingenuity, due process, tonight is Monday night, Eddie's night and
[04:48.840 --> 04:54.160]  Eddie you said you want to go over the enacting clause some more.
[04:54.160 --> 04:59.840]  Yes, I would like to go a little deeper into that if I may tonight, but before we get into
[04:59.840 --> 05:03.640]  that, you know I figured something out today, everybody knows about the bill that Arizona
[05:03.640 --> 05:07.840]  just passed regarding the immigration law, right?
[05:07.840 --> 05:13.480]  I finally figured out what Obama's biggest problem with that bill is and that's going
[05:13.480 --> 05:16.960]  to be if he's ever traveling through Arizona and gets pulled over, they're going to come
[05:16.960 --> 05:25.600]  up and say license, registration, proof of citizenship and birth certificate.
[05:25.600 --> 05:26.600]  He's got a problem.
[05:26.600 --> 05:31.440]  Yes, he does, he's not going to be able to produce any of that.
[05:31.440 --> 05:37.700]  Oh, but anyway, it's just kind of ridiculous the way they're doing things up in the federal
[05:37.700 --> 05:40.920]  government over telling the states what they can't do when they're the ones refusing to
[05:40.920 --> 05:43.620]  enforce the laws that are in place.
[05:43.620 --> 05:46.760]  But in any case, let's go through what we're talking about here tonight with the enacting
[05:46.760 --> 05:47.760]  clause.
[05:47.760 --> 05:53.000]  Now as we know, the enacting clause of the state constitution makes it very, very clear,
[05:53.000 --> 05:58.240]  Article 3, Section 29, enacting clause of laws.
[05:58.240 --> 06:05.920]  The enacting clause of all laws shall be, be it enacted by the legislature of the state
[06:05.920 --> 06:06.920]  of Texas.
[06:06.920 --> 06:13.360]  Now that is a constitutional requirement for anything that is calling itself a law.
[06:13.360 --> 06:18.520]  So those of you that have access to your internet browser right now, go to the Texas Government
[06:18.520 --> 06:25.960]  Code, all right, Section 554.001, definitions.
[06:25.960 --> 06:32.140]  Now this particular chapter deals with protection for reporting violations of law.
[06:32.140 --> 06:41.040]  And here it says under sub-item one, law means a state or federal statute, an ordinance of
[06:41.040 --> 06:48.360]  a local governmental entity, or a rule adopted under a statute or ordinance.
[06:48.360 --> 06:57.120]  Now question, what type of people can a rule adopted under a statute or ordinance be binding
[06:57.120 --> 06:58.680]  upon?
[06:58.680 --> 07:00.560]  How can it be binding upon us?
[07:00.560 --> 07:04.600]  One, we normally don't see any of the rules.
[07:04.600 --> 07:08.100]  We don't work for the company that makes the rules.
[07:08.100 --> 07:12.280]  So how can the rule be a law?
[07:12.280 --> 07:16.840]  Second thing is, an ordinance of a local government entity.
[07:16.840 --> 07:19.520]  How can that be a law?
[07:19.520 --> 07:22.520]  It doesn't have an enacting clause.
[07:22.520 --> 07:27.080]  Not only does it not have the enacting clause, it wasn't passed by the legislature, which
[07:27.080 --> 07:34.320]  specifically is named in the enacting clause as being the only entity available under that
[07:34.320 --> 07:37.760]  power or to use that power.
[07:37.760 --> 07:44.320]  And I can't find any place in the Constitution that delegates it any lower than the legislature.
[07:44.320 --> 07:49.760]  Nor the legislature can't delegate it any lower than the legislature because we the
[07:49.760 --> 07:53.520]  people did not grant them the power to do that.
[07:53.520 --> 07:59.100]  Now let me give you some examples of why this section is important to us.
[07:59.100 --> 08:05.280]  Number two, local governmental entity means a political subdivision of the state including
[08:05.280 --> 08:14.960]  a county, municipality, public school district, or special purpose district or authority.
[08:14.960 --> 08:21.880]  Now how did any of these entities get the authority to make law that could possibly
[08:21.880 --> 08:25.600]  be binding upon the people of Texas?
[08:25.600 --> 08:32.520]  Okay, we've got all these lower subsets of governmental entities that the legislature
[08:32.520 --> 08:41.400]  is saying can create law and the state constitution says no, you can't.
[08:41.400 --> 08:44.080]  So let's see how they argue that later on.
[08:44.080 --> 08:47.760]  But while we're waiting on that argument to take place, let's look at some of the other
[08:47.760 --> 08:50.040]  things that we've got going on here.
[08:50.040 --> 08:56.200]  I've got several chapters of the various codes up, most of which are the government code,
[08:56.200 --> 08:58.520]  but let me read you something here.
[08:58.520 --> 09:04.080]  Government code section 26.045, original criminal jurisdiction.
[09:04.080 --> 09:10.480]  Now this section falls under chapter 26 which deals with constitutional county courts.
[09:10.480 --> 09:17.220]  And it says here in subsection A, except as provided by subsection C, a county court has
[09:17.220 --> 09:23.400]  exclusive original jurisdiction of misdemeanors other than misdemeanors involving official
[09:23.400 --> 09:31.360]  misconduct and cases in which the highest fine that may be imposed is $500 or less.
[09:31.360 --> 09:38.360]  So the constitutional county court does not have jurisdiction of any official misconduct
[09:38.360 --> 09:46.520]  case or any case where the highest fine that is imposed is $500 or less.
[09:46.520 --> 09:53.980]  Then you go down subsection B, except as provided by subsection C, a county court has jurisdiction
[09:53.980 --> 09:59.760]  in the forfeiture and final judgment of bonds and recognizes taken in criminal cases within
[09:59.760 --> 10:03.380]  the court's jurisdiction.
[10:03.380 --> 10:07.680]  Then we get to subsection C. Now this is interesting.
[10:07.680 --> 10:13.960]  Except as provided by subsections D and F, a county court that is in a county with a
[10:13.960 --> 10:22.240]  criminal district court does not have any criminal jurisdiction.
[10:22.240 --> 10:23.240]  You get that?
[10:23.240 --> 10:32.080]  If there's a district court, except as provided by subsections D and F, a county court that
[10:32.080 --> 10:38.660]  is in a county with a criminal district court does not have any criminal jurisdiction.
[10:38.660 --> 10:40.720]  So what does D and F say?
[10:40.720 --> 10:48.800]  D says a county court in a county with a population of 2 million or more has original jurisdiction
[10:48.800 --> 10:57.760]  over cases alleging a violation of section 25.093 or 094 education code.
[10:57.760 --> 11:06.000]  Subsection E, subsection C and D do not affect the jurisdiction of a statutory county court.
[11:06.000 --> 11:13.040]  And F, a county court has concurrent jurisdiction with a municipal court in cases that arise
[11:13.040 --> 11:19.960]  in the municipality's extraterritorial jurisdiction and that arise under an ordinance of the municipality
[11:19.960 --> 11:27.280]  applicable to the extraterritorial jurisdiction under section 216.902 local government code.
[11:27.280 --> 11:32.320]  I'm going to have to read that a few times.
[11:32.320 --> 11:37.920]  But it's basically saying that the constitutional county court has concurrent jurisdiction in
[11:37.920 --> 11:44.920]  this case with a municipal court that arise under an ordinance of the municipality.
[11:44.920 --> 11:51.280]  And that ordinance applies to the extraterritorial jurisdiction as set forth under 216.902 local
[11:51.280 --> 11:53.160]  government code.
[11:53.160 --> 12:00.320]  Now again, the problem I'm having with this is the statutory county court, in other words,
[12:00.320 --> 12:07.840]  a corporate court created by statute and not by constitution has criminal jurisdiction
[12:07.840 --> 12:12.960]  where the constitutional county court has none.
[12:12.960 --> 12:19.120]  Somehow or other, there appears to be a problem there because the ability to act according
[12:19.120 --> 12:27.480]  to the constitution as a constitutional county court does not appear to be available to the
[12:27.480 --> 12:33.800]  county court under certain criminal cases because they have no jurisdiction over such
[12:33.800 --> 12:34.800]  cases.
[12:34.800 --> 12:39.520]  Now why do you think they would separate that type of power from a constitutional county
[12:39.520 --> 12:43.320]  court?
[12:43.320 --> 12:50.080]  Now let's look at a couple of other sections here that we're going through on this.
[12:50.080 --> 13:01.360]  Let's look at government code, section 27.031, subsection C. This deals with jurisdiction.
[13:01.360 --> 13:08.840]  And it's subchapter B, jurisdiction and powers of justice courts.
[13:08.840 --> 13:14.280]  Subsection C says a justice court has concurrent jurisdiction with a municipal court in cases
[13:14.280 --> 13:21.320]  that arise in the municipality's extraterritorial jurisdiction and that arise under an ordinance
[13:21.320 --> 13:28.760]  of the municipality applicable to the extraterritorial jurisdiction under section 216.902 local government
[13:28.760 --> 13:30.040]  code.
[13:30.040 --> 13:37.320]  Now the question I've got to ask is how does a county court gain enforcement authority
[13:37.320 --> 13:42.880]  over a corporate ordinance of a municipality?
[13:42.880 --> 13:47.800]  Really didn't we have the argument one evening that it's impossible for this one to have
[13:47.800 --> 13:50.400]  jurisdiction over that one because?
[13:50.400 --> 14:04.800]  This one, that one, we're talking about a municipal prosecutor prosecuting a state law.
[14:04.800 --> 14:13.560]  So how in the world does this get to be where it is here in these results because it strikes
[14:13.560 --> 14:21.800]  me kind of odd that a justice of the peace court is now responsible and has jurisdiction
[14:21.800 --> 14:26.720]  over a municipal ordinance.
[14:26.720 --> 14:31.960]  And I just don't see that being valid.
[14:31.960 --> 14:35.400]  It's essentially a corporate rule.
[14:35.400 --> 14:37.400]  Exactly.
[14:37.400 --> 14:48.640]  So by what remote method do you come up with the idea that a county court that has nothing
[14:48.640 --> 14:55.880]  to any other power under the municipality itself is suddenly responsible of having a
[14:55.880 --> 14:59.000]  jurisdiction concurrent under ordinances?
[14:59.000 --> 15:04.960]  The other question is how does a municipality get extraterritorial jurisdiction?
[15:04.960 --> 15:09.640]  That's an oxymoron statement, isn't it?
[15:09.640 --> 15:15.480]  There's statutes that authorize the municipality to exercise jurisdiction for a certain distance
[15:15.480 --> 15:18.160]  beyond their borders.
[15:18.160 --> 15:23.000]  My son-in-law had a lot of problems with that in Bridgeport, Texas.
[15:23.000 --> 15:29.080]  He had a dairy farm and they're trying to enforce extraterritorial jurisdiction over
[15:29.080 --> 15:30.080]  his dairy farm.
[15:30.080 --> 15:33.720]  I think they were upset that his cows were taking a dump in the yard.
[15:33.720 --> 15:40.520]  Ah, well, I'd have taken him to the courthouse and let him have that one.
[15:40.520 --> 15:45.920]  But be that as it may, that bothers me, okay, for obvious reasons.
[15:45.920 --> 15:49.060]  We've got these people doing all this.
[15:49.060 --> 15:52.200]  But let's look at something else here.
[15:52.200 --> 15:54.600]  Now let's look at another location.
[15:54.600 --> 16:02.720]  This is Section 22.1105, Government Code, and this is the Chapter 22, Dealing with Appellate
[16:02.720 --> 16:04.000]  Courts.
[16:04.000 --> 16:10.360]  Now this is talking about judicial instruction related to certain alleged child offenders,
[16:10.360 --> 16:17.360]  okay, meaning children, minors that have violated some alleged law.
[16:17.360 --> 16:23.960]  Section A, each judge of a court with jurisdiction to hear a complaint against a child alleging
[16:23.960 --> 16:30.840]  a violation of a misdemeanor offense punishable by fine only, other than a traffic offense
[16:30.840 --> 16:35.400]  or public intoxication, or a violation of a penal ordinance.
[16:35.400 --> 16:39.840]  I hear the music going to break, the folks hanging in there.
[16:39.840 --> 16:42.840]  We'll get on to this again when we get back on the other side of the break.
[16:42.840 --> 16:47.320]  This is Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we will be
[16:47.320 --> 17:01.800]  right back.
[17:01.800 --> 17:06.280]  Capital Coin and Bullion is your local source for rare coins, precious metals, and coin
[17:06.280 --> 17:08.720]  supplies in the Austin metro area.
[17:08.720 --> 17:10.760]  We also ship worldwide.
[17:10.760 --> 17:14.800]  We are a family-owned and operated business that offers competitive prices on your coin
[17:14.800 --> 17:15.800]  and metals purchases.
[17:15.800 --> 17:21.520]  We buy, sell, trade, and consign rare coins, gold and silver coin collections, precious
[17:21.520 --> 17:23.400]  metals, and scrap gold.
[17:23.400 --> 17:27.000]  We will purchase and sell gold and jewelry items as well.
[17:27.000 --> 17:29.600]  We offer daily specials on coins and bullion.
[17:29.600 --> 17:35.360]  We're located at 5448 Burnett Road, Suite 3, and we're open Monday through Friday,
[17:35.360 --> 17:39.560]  10 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturdays, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
[17:39.560 --> 17:42.720]  You are welcome to stop in our shop during regular business hours.
[17:42.720 --> 17:48.280]  Or call 512-646-6440 with any questions.
[17:48.280 --> 17:53.160]  Ask for Chad and say you've heard about us on Rule of Law Radio or 90.1 FM and get a
[17:53.160 --> 17:54.160]  special discount.
[17:54.160 --> 18:13.640]  That's Capital Coin and Bullion, 512-646-6440.
[18:24.160 --> 18:51.400]  We're open Monday through Friday, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturdays, 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.,
[18:51.400 --> 19:09.800]  Saturdays, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturdays, 10 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturdays, 10 a.m. to
[19:09.800 --> 19:10.800]  5 p.m.
[19:10.800 --> 19:11.800]  All right, we are back.
[19:11.800 --> 19:12.800]  Okay, we are talking about the enacting clause.
[19:12.800 --> 19:18.160]  Rule of Law Radio, where we get into things that they won't tell you on the regular news.
[19:18.160 --> 19:20.880]  All right, let's talk about this again now.
[19:20.880 --> 19:27.960]  In this enacting clause, we're sitting here and we're talking about how this judicial
[19:27.960 --> 19:33.840]  instruction related to certain alleged child offenders where it says that each judge of
[19:33.840 --> 19:38.400]  a court with jurisdiction to hear a complaint against a child alleging a violation of a
[19:38.400 --> 19:46.760]  misdemeanor offense punishable by fine only other than a traffic offense or public intoxication
[19:46.760 --> 19:56.360]  or a violation of a penal ordinance of a political subdivision other than a traffic offense.
[19:56.360 --> 20:00.880]  That just violates everything in the enacting clause.
[20:00.880 --> 20:02.280]  Did you understand that?
[20:02.280 --> 20:05.800]  A penal ordinance.
[20:05.800 --> 20:13.400]  How does a municipality create a penal ordinance?
[20:13.400 --> 20:23.880]  How does the ordinance get to be law that is compliant with the state constitution?
[20:23.880 --> 20:26.320]  How is it going to happen?
[20:26.320 --> 20:28.120]  It has no enacting clause.
[20:28.120 --> 20:37.020]  It is not passed by the state legislature as the enacting clause specifically requires.
[20:37.020 --> 20:44.360]  So how is it possible for a municipality or a county or a public school or any other type
[20:44.360 --> 20:53.080]  of governmental agency at the lower rungs making rules that we never see able to create
[20:53.080 --> 21:04.380]  law that we never voted on or approved of and can be used against us?
[21:04.380 --> 21:10.400]  Everything stinks and it's not the fish lunch.
[21:10.400 --> 21:12.840]  It's a lie, people.
[21:12.840 --> 21:19.920]  The very laws written are in direct conflict with the constitution that they are supposed
[21:19.920 --> 21:22.940]  to be in compliance with.
[21:22.940 --> 21:31.320]  This is dead bang in your face evidence and proof that this is what they're doing.
[21:31.320 --> 21:36.320]  They have thrown the constitution out the window.
[21:36.320 --> 21:37.640]  They don't read it.
[21:37.640 --> 21:39.160]  They don't understand it.
[21:39.160 --> 21:49.520]  They don't know it and they get away with it because neither do we.
[21:49.520 --> 21:56.560]  We do not spend the time educating our kids on who they are and that's true because most
[21:56.560 --> 22:01.080]  of us don't know who we are.
[22:01.080 --> 22:05.400]  How can we stand for something that we know nothing about?
[22:05.400 --> 22:10.000]  Why would we stand for something we know nothing about?
[22:10.000 --> 22:16.640]  It's very hard to have a belief that you've never even got formulated in your mind, right?
[22:16.640 --> 22:21.040]  We've all assumed for far too long that the government was acting in our best interest
[22:21.040 --> 22:24.080]  because that's why they were put in place, right?
[22:24.080 --> 22:27.360]  Surely they can't possibly get out of hand and want to do something other than what we
[22:27.360 --> 22:35.080]  told them they could and let's go back to some of the patriot mythology here for a minute.
[22:35.080 --> 22:39.960]  There is one truth to this corporate argument that they make.
[22:39.960 --> 22:48.040]  There's one absolute fundamental proof and that is that when you look at what they're
[22:48.040 --> 22:56.560]  doing it is all about the profit, the money, the bottom line and what is the mandate under
[22:56.560 --> 23:02.760]  law for any for-profit corporation.
[23:02.760 --> 23:12.400]  By law its officers are mandated to operate the business for the purpose and intent of
[23:12.400 --> 23:18.520]  generating a profit for the shareholders.
[23:18.520 --> 23:22.240]  That is by law.
[23:22.240 --> 23:30.920]  Now if these officers are working on behalf of the shareholders, who are the shareholders?
[23:30.920 --> 23:36.200]  Because I'm not getting any residual checks, are any of you?
[23:36.200 --> 23:44.080]  And if you are, other than welfare or something along that line, please tell me where to go
[23:44.080 --> 23:48.680]  sign up so I can get part of my money back.
[23:48.680 --> 23:56.240]  Because unless we're getting the money, it's being used for something other than the benefit
[23:56.240 --> 24:00.560]  of the people, wouldn't you think?
[24:00.560 --> 24:10.320]  Since when did the people write a constitution and declare that the corporate charter?
[24:10.320 --> 24:15.880]  And then at the same time tell the corporation it's just a suggestion.
[24:15.880 --> 24:18.960]  You don't really have to follow it.
[24:18.960 --> 24:25.340]  But you know, at least try to give the impression you are.
[24:25.340 --> 24:30.140]  We are where we are because of our ignorance and because of our apathy.
[24:30.140 --> 24:36.000]  So our purpose here on rule of law is to try to cure both.
[24:36.000 --> 24:41.640]  We do what we do to educate you to become more knowledgeable for ourselves, to give
[24:41.640 --> 24:49.080]  us the ability to help you and others like you, to basically help you wipe the sleepy
[24:49.080 --> 24:53.600]  and fuzziness out of your eyes and your brain so that you can begin to see what's being
[24:53.600 --> 24:59.240]  done to you and why it's being done to you.
[24:59.240 --> 25:05.040]  The more you go through the things that we should be teaching in school so that our kids
[25:05.040 --> 25:13.160]  know who they are, know why things were set up a certain way, not know how they are as
[25:13.160 --> 25:20.360]  much as why they were put in place originally and what rules bound them originally, can
[25:20.360 --> 25:25.720]  they begin to see where we are now?
[25:25.720 --> 25:32.800]  And the worst mistake we can make if we ever get our hands back over this in full control,
[25:32.800 --> 25:39.080]  the worst mistake we will make is to once again allow them to create it as a for-profit
[25:39.080 --> 25:46.440]  corporation rather than a people-servant government.
[25:46.440 --> 25:50.160]  That is all they are supposed to be.
[25:50.160 --> 25:56.480]  No government should have more money in its treasury than it can use in the year in which
[25:56.480 --> 26:03.800]  it is collected for the benefit of the people as a whole.
[26:03.800 --> 26:14.080]  It is not there to serve any one group, any one class, any singular private purpose.
[26:14.080 --> 26:21.860]  The government is not allowed to spend one penny that can't be accounted for and used
[26:21.860 --> 26:27.080]  for the benefit of the people as a whole.
[26:27.080 --> 26:29.160]  It's just not.
[26:29.160 --> 26:32.400]  We did not allow that.
[26:32.400 --> 26:39.400]  They have usurped that power, though, because we fell asleep.
[26:39.400 --> 26:44.080]  It's how we wound up with the driver's license and registration and insurance conundrum that
[26:44.080 --> 26:45.080]  we're in.
[26:45.080 --> 26:49.280]  It's how we wound up with the Department of Homeland Security.
[26:49.280 --> 26:54.360]  It's how we wound up with government officials that are unaccountable to the public.
[26:54.360 --> 26:59.200]  It's how we wound up with a Congress and a state legislature that could care less what
[26:59.200 --> 27:05.680]  the people have to say about the running of the government or the spending of the money.
[27:05.680 --> 27:12.440]  They don't care because they don't respect us, and they don't respect us because we've
[27:12.440 --> 27:16.220]  just been a bunch of lumps sitting around doing everything they've set up to this point.
[27:16.220 --> 27:21.320]  How would they respect us?
[27:21.320 --> 27:24.200]  I read a book once.
[27:24.200 --> 27:31.120]  The title of it is called Hope, and it's about this guy, a constitutionalist who manages
[27:31.120 --> 27:36.200]  to get himself elected president of the United States and then spends his entire time as
[27:36.200 --> 27:42.460]  president trying to enforce the original Bill of Rights.
[27:42.460 --> 27:46.880]  There are assassination attempts against him and all kinds of things through the story
[27:46.880 --> 27:52.560]  in this book, and he's trying to explain to his Secret Service guy that's in charge of
[27:52.560 --> 27:58.680]  his detail why he's doing what he's doing and the problems that he faces by doing it.
[27:58.680 --> 28:03.360]  One of the things that he tells him is, the biggest problem I face is the genie in the
[28:03.360 --> 28:05.840]  bottom.
[28:05.840 --> 28:14.680]  Really meant by that was that we have allowed certain aspects of the private sector, namely
[28:14.680 --> 28:19.320]  those corporate individuals that control most all the major business and everything in the
[28:19.320 --> 28:31.000]  country, and the government sector to profit and steal and benefit off the backs of the
[28:31.000 --> 28:40.280]  people for so long that they have come to look at it as their right and as theirs to
[28:40.280 --> 28:42.200]  do with as they will.
[28:42.200 --> 28:43.680]  It's okay that they steal it.
[28:43.680 --> 28:46.480]  They deserve it.
[28:46.480 --> 28:49.120]  That's their thoughts on it.
[28:49.120 --> 28:55.480]  The problem is that now I am trying to take that and give it back to those to whom it
[28:55.480 --> 29:00.480]  rightfully belongs, which naturally upsets those that have stolen it for all this time
[29:00.480 --> 29:04.280]  and come to look at it as theirs.
[29:04.280 --> 29:07.680]  How do you solve that conundrum?
[29:07.680 --> 29:13.000]  People that have never fought to be free in their life have suddenly decided that they
[29:13.000 --> 29:19.040]  want to be free and they want what's rightfully theirs, but those that have made their fortunes
[29:19.040 --> 29:24.300]  and living off the backs of those same people that are waking up now believe they're completely
[29:24.300 --> 29:28.880]  entitled and have an absolute right to everything they've stolen.
[29:28.880 --> 29:33.120]  How do you put that genie back in the bottle?
[29:33.120 --> 29:34.560]  Well that's where we're at.
[29:34.560 --> 29:36.560]  How do we get him back in the bottle?
[29:36.560 --> 29:39.760]  All right, we're going to break again.
[29:39.760 --> 29:43.720]  I'll be wrapping this up, so we'll start taking phone calls on the other side.
[29:43.720 --> 29:48.120]  This is Eddie Craig, Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Rule of Law Radio, and we'll be right
[29:48.120 --> 30:01.440]  back after this break.
[30:01.440 --> 30:05.620]  My name is Randall Kelton and I co-host on Rule of Law Radio.
[30:05.620 --> 30:10.420]  We specialize in showing people how to strike back against corrupt public officials.
[30:10.420 --> 30:14.840]  With the mortgage crisis worsening, we set our sights on finding a remedy for people
[30:14.840 --> 30:16.980]  who have been cheated by their lenders.
[30:16.980 --> 30:21.160]  If you have a mortgage or have paid yours off, you have probably been cheated out of
[30:21.160 --> 30:23.520]  thousands, but there is a remedy.
[30:23.520 --> 30:32.800]  Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call me at 512-430-4140 and find out how to use the
[30:32.800 --> 30:38.380]  consumer protection laws to recover what the lenders have stolen through fraud and deception.
[30:38.380 --> 30:43.180]  We will prepare for you a qualified written request that will expose the fraud and put
[30:43.180 --> 30:45.080]  the lenders on the dime.
[30:45.080 --> 30:49.140]  Consumer fraud is bankrupting this country and it's time to fight back.
[30:49.140 --> 30:58.800]  Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call 512-430-4140 and get the information you need to stop the
[30:58.800 --> 31:02.120]  money changers in their tracks.
[31:02.120 --> 31:05.280]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[31:05.280 --> 31:12.040]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary, the affordable, easy to understand, 4-CD course
[31:12.040 --> 31:15.360]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[31:15.360 --> 31:19.760]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[31:19.760 --> 31:24.520]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[31:24.520 --> 31:29.760]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course and now you can too.
[31:29.760 --> 31:34.600]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[31:34.600 --> 31:40.200]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the
[31:40.200 --> 31:43.960]  principles and practices that control our American courts.
[31:43.960 --> 31:50.680]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[31:50.680 --> 31:53.000]  pro se tactics and much more.
[31:53.000 --> 32:01.080]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[32:01.080 --> 32:14.600]  Yeah, I got a warrant and I'm going to solve that to the head of government then prosecute
[32:14.600 --> 32:15.600]  them.
[32:15.600 --> 32:16.600]  Okay.
[32:16.600 --> 32:17.600]  Hold still.
[32:17.600 --> 32:37.280]  I need a prosecutor to come and help me prosecute them wicked leaders, you see.
[32:37.280 --> 32:56.760]  I need a prosecutor to come and help me prosecute them wicked leaders, you see.
[32:56.760 --> 33:15.760]  I need a prosecutor to come and help me prosecute them wicked leaders, you see.
[33:15.760 --> 33:24.760]  I need a prosecutor to come and help me prosecute them wicked leaders, you see.
[33:24.760 --> 33:30.120]  I need a prosecutor to come and help me prosecute them wicked leaders, you see.
[33:30.120 --> 33:31.380]  All right.
[33:31.380 --> 33:32.880]  We are back.
[33:32.880 --> 33:47.080]  Now, normally, this is traffic night, so if you have questions or comments on traffic
[33:47.080 --> 33:51.260]  or anything that we've talked about so far, please feel free to call in.
[33:51.260 --> 33:58.060]  So we'll go ahead and open up the telephone lines, 512-646-1984, and while we're waiting
[33:58.060 --> 34:04.220]  on callers to come in, Randy, you had some observations or something you wanted to talk
[34:04.220 --> 34:05.220]  about?
[34:05.220 --> 34:06.220]  No.
[34:06.220 --> 34:10.460]  I was trying to butt out at your night, and frankly, you went over those things, and I'm
[34:10.460 --> 34:15.900]  listening to them, and I feel like, you know, it's good for me to listen to that because
[34:15.900 --> 34:20.020]  I feel like people who listen to me when I do that.
[34:20.020 --> 34:23.860]  I'm listening to it, and I'm thinking, man, I've got to get these out and read them three
[34:23.860 --> 34:24.860]  or four times.
[34:24.860 --> 34:28.020]  I'm having trouble keeping up.
[34:28.020 --> 34:30.020]  You buried me.
[34:30.020 --> 34:37.160]  Well, I apologize for, as Randy originally put it, dealing with me on this information
[34:37.160 --> 34:42.260]  is like drinking from a fire hose, as I believe how he states it, and I apologize for that.
[34:42.260 --> 34:48.780]  I just figure that the slower I go, the more people are going to think I'm trying to belittle
[34:48.780 --> 34:52.940]  their ability to absorb and comprehend, and I don't wish anyone to have that feeling around
[34:52.940 --> 34:53.940]  me.
[34:53.940 --> 34:54.940]  If they want me to slow down, they can tell me.
[34:54.940 --> 34:55.940]  No.
[34:55.940 --> 34:58.860]  When he's going slow, he's actually talking to me.
[34:58.860 --> 35:02.060]  He's trying not to swallow, not to bury me.
[35:02.060 --> 35:11.900]  Actually, I call Eddie my walking tech manual, but it's good to hear that because it makes
[35:11.900 --> 35:20.580]  me think about when I'm walking through due process, and I'm pushing these statutes.
[35:20.580 --> 35:25.540]  I'm trying to find a way to back up and give referential index to each one and put together
[35:25.540 --> 35:26.540]  so that it makes sense.
[35:26.540 --> 35:27.540]  Hey, Randy.
[35:27.540 --> 35:28.540]  Randy.
[35:28.540 --> 35:30.220]  Randy, we're having some trouble, some technical difficulties on your end.
[35:30.220 --> 35:31.540]  There's getting a lot of feedback.
[35:31.540 --> 35:33.380]  Can you get closer to your mic?
[35:33.380 --> 35:35.100]  I am pretty close to it.
[35:35.100 --> 35:36.100]  Okay, that's better.
[35:36.100 --> 35:37.100]  Okay.
[35:37.100 --> 35:38.100]  Okay, yeah.
[35:38.100 --> 35:39.100]  That's about all I have to say.
[35:39.100 --> 35:42.100]  Make sure you don't have any speakers on or something like that.
[35:42.100 --> 35:43.100]  I don't have any speakers on.
[35:43.100 --> 35:44.100]  I don't have any fans on.
[35:44.100 --> 35:45.100]  I don't have anything on.
[35:45.100 --> 35:46.100]  Okay, good.
[35:46.100 --> 35:47.100]  Thanks.
[35:47.100 --> 35:48.100]  All right.
[35:48.100 --> 35:56.380]  So now that we know that there are certain things out there that can't be law, despite
[35:56.380 --> 36:00.940]  the legislature's great desire to delegate that authority to ever Tom, Dick, and Harry
[36:00.940 --> 36:06.100]  with a corporate title, what are we going to do about it?
[36:06.100 --> 36:09.220]  How are we going to counteract it?
[36:09.220 --> 36:15.580]  Well, as I said before, we are trying to find exactly how we're going to get on the floor
[36:15.580 --> 36:24.100]  of the Texas legislature before the body is assembled and make a little outline of exactly
[36:24.100 --> 36:27.740]  where the rights of the people are in relation to the Constitution and the statutes as a
[36:27.740 --> 36:34.940]  whole, or at least I hope we're able to do that, as well as go through step by step certain
[36:34.940 --> 36:39.700]  sections of due process, the Code of Criminal Procedure, Government Code, and Transportation
[36:39.700 --> 36:49.400]  Code of exactly how these laws are being used and abused by the courts, by the police departments,
[36:49.400 --> 36:54.940]  by the legislature themselves in the name of corporate profit, because that's all it's
[36:54.940 --> 36:55.940]  for, folks.
[36:55.940 --> 36:57.820]  It's for corporate profit.
[36:57.820 --> 37:05.260]  Nowhere in the Constitution does it say the people hereby establish the Republic of Texas
[37:05.260 --> 37:11.220]  as a for-profit corporation to generate revenue above and beyond the ability of all other
[37:11.220 --> 37:15.580]  states so that we can show a good bottom line.
[37:15.580 --> 37:22.980]  I don't think that's in the Constitution anywhere, but that's what's happening.
[37:22.980 --> 37:24.980]  That's how it's being run.
[37:24.980 --> 37:33.440]  In the eyes of those that are in office, we are nothing more than the low-level employees
[37:33.440 --> 37:40.060]  of the corporation, and we are duty-bound under the corporate policy and rules to do
[37:40.060 --> 37:46.860]  everything the corporate masters want to happen and order us to do.
[37:46.860 --> 37:48.500]  And you know what?
[37:48.500 --> 37:52.140]  I'm not drawing a paycheck for that.
[37:52.140 --> 37:57.580]  And if I'm not drawing a paycheck for it, I'm not working for them.
[37:57.580 --> 38:03.020]  And if I'm not working for them, I'm not bound by that policy.
[38:03.020 --> 38:07.460]  That's just my take on it, but hey, I'm just that way.
[38:07.460 --> 38:10.260]  What can I say?
[38:10.260 --> 38:15.340]  Now along that, you know, let's take a good example.
[38:15.340 --> 38:23.780]  I'm going to go down tomorrow and I'm going to sign up all of my dogs for welfare, okay?
[38:23.780 --> 38:26.140]  And I can guarantee you what's going to happen.
[38:26.140 --> 38:28.100]  You're going to go in there and you tell them, I want to sign up.
[38:28.100 --> 38:29.420]  I've got five or six dogs.
[38:29.420 --> 38:30.900]  I'm going to sign them all up for welfare.
[38:30.900 --> 38:34.580]  And they're going to look at you and say, wait a minute, dogs are not eligible to draw
[38:34.580 --> 38:35.580]  welfare.
[38:35.580 --> 38:39.820]  So I'm just going to look at them and say, wait a minute, let's see, one of the qualifications
[38:39.820 --> 38:40.900]  for drawing welfare.
[38:40.900 --> 38:42.380]  Let's take a look at your policy.
[38:42.380 --> 38:43.380]  Okay.
[38:43.380 --> 38:44.380]  Here's your policy.
[38:44.380 --> 38:47.580]  Yeah, my dogs are all mixed in color.
[38:47.580 --> 38:52.740]  They're unemployed, they're lazy, they don't speak English, they don't have any clue who
[38:52.740 --> 38:57.340]  their daddies are, yet they expect me to feed them, provide for them, give them medical
[38:57.340 --> 39:01.020]  care and build them a house, and every one of them just acts like they're guilty for
[39:01.020 --> 39:03.020]  being a dog.
[39:03.020 --> 39:11.460]  So starting Friday, my dogs will get their first check because I guarantee you, the problem
[39:11.460 --> 39:21.900]  we have is we are being subjugated to pay for the ludicrous asinine policies this corporation
[39:21.900 --> 39:30.180]  is making up at our expense to support individuals under exactly those circumstances.
[39:30.180 --> 39:37.900]  People that don't care, that think they deserve something for nothing, that think everyone
[39:37.900 --> 39:44.420]  owes them something because 200 years ago, someone either owned an ancestor of theirs
[39:44.420 --> 39:48.160]  or knew somebody that did.
[39:48.160 --> 39:54.200]  And the biggest problem we have is I've never owned one, none of the relatives in my memory
[39:54.200 --> 40:07.340]  have ever owned a slave or an indentured servant or a sweatshop or anything of that nature.
[40:07.340 --> 40:13.100]  But we've got people crossing the borders into this country, and especially Texas because
[40:13.100 --> 40:19.740]  of where we are in relation to those borders, we are carrying billions of dollars a year
[40:19.740 --> 40:26.460]  on the backs of the public because the corporate policy is everybody's more deserving than
[40:26.460 --> 40:30.540]  those that work and earn their living.
[40:30.540 --> 40:35.700]  And so is it any wonder that every Tom, Dick and Harry in the branch of government can
[40:35.700 --> 40:40.780]  create law binding upon somebody, okay?
[40:40.780 --> 40:44.020]  They're the ones that's most familiar with how many of these people they're supporting
[40:44.020 --> 40:48.700]  in their local area, so let's make a rule that everybody that has it can contribute
[40:48.700 --> 40:55.580]  their fair share to those that don't, whether they like it or not.
[40:55.580 --> 40:58.700]  It's getting to be the national theme, folks.
[40:58.700 --> 41:02.140]  And I don't have anything against foreign people, I don't have anything against people
[41:02.140 --> 41:05.040]  from other countries, I've been to many countries.
[41:05.040 --> 41:09.500]  In fact, I like a lot of them a lot better than I like most Americans that I've encountered
[41:09.500 --> 41:11.340]  lately.
[41:11.340 --> 41:14.940]  They know more about what our history is than we do.
[41:14.940 --> 41:20.820]  They understand the desire for freedom better than we do because they've had to fight for
[41:20.820 --> 41:22.440]  it their entire life.
[41:22.440 --> 41:29.180]  We haven't since the revolution, since the Civil War, we haven't really had to fight
[41:29.180 --> 41:33.620]  for freedom of the individual in this country in a very long time.
[41:33.620 --> 41:37.780]  And we've forgotten what it requires.
[41:37.780 --> 41:40.940]  It's a personal sacrifice nobody's willing to make anymore.
[41:40.940 --> 41:44.260]  Now, there are exceptions, of course.
[41:44.260 --> 41:50.220]  Those of you out there that are long-time listeners to this show, that listen to shows
[41:50.220 --> 41:57.380]  like it, that study to know where we came from, where we're going, and hopefully how
[41:57.380 --> 42:01.700]  to stop us from getting there the way we're getting there and becoming something we were
[42:01.700 --> 42:05.780]  never meant to be.
[42:05.780 --> 42:07.460]  I don't like where I see us going.
[42:07.460 --> 42:10.020]  I really, really don't.
[42:10.020 --> 42:15.860]  And so I've kind of made it my mission in life to educate as many folks as possible,
[42:15.860 --> 42:17.980]  as has Randy and Deborah.
[42:17.980 --> 42:23.260]  I mean, I feel so blessed and honored that they actually allow me to participate in this
[42:23.260 --> 42:28.980]  show and become a regular co-host with them, that they think enough of what I've got to
[42:28.980 --> 42:34.220]  say and what I've got to contribute that they let me on the air to talk to you folks.
[42:34.220 --> 42:35.500]  That's an honor for me.
[42:35.500 --> 42:39.340]  This is not something I ever dreamed of doing or ever considered doing or ever thought I
[42:39.340 --> 42:42.940]  could do reasonably well.
[42:42.940 --> 42:47.380]  But as the saying goes, God's never going to open a door for you that He's not going
[42:47.380 --> 42:49.340]  to equip you and prepare you to walk through.
[42:49.340 --> 42:52.980]  So I guess that's how I got here.
[42:52.980 --> 42:58.980]  And so for Randy and Deborah for allowing me to be here, thank you both very much in
[42:58.980 --> 43:00.260]  every way you can imagine.
[43:00.260 --> 43:01.260]  Thank you.
[43:01.260 --> 43:06.540]  And for those folks that are listening, that are supportive, and send me email and everything
[43:06.540 --> 43:12.260]  with their questions and comments and other information, thank you, too.
[43:12.260 --> 43:18.860]  Okay, and just a word for anyone who feels thankful.
[43:18.860 --> 43:23.300]  Look, Randy's beer font.
[43:23.300 --> 43:25.620]  Somehow or other I knew that was coming.
[43:25.620 --> 43:32.900]  Yeah, and Eddie, you know, the way I feel, the opportunity isn't mine to give.
[43:32.900 --> 43:40.900]  I mean, this is coming from the Lord, and we're just conduits, so we appreciate it.
[43:40.900 --> 43:44.820]  Yeah, but you and Randy had to agree, or I wouldn't be here.
[43:44.820 --> 43:47.820]  Well, didn't we all agree to agree?
[43:47.820 --> 43:50.380]  All right, we've got some callers.
[43:50.380 --> 43:55.300]  We've got Michael from Maryland, and Jerry from Oregon, Russell had just called in.
[43:55.300 --> 43:56.300]  Please call back in, Russell.
[43:56.300 --> 43:59.300]  We'll be right back.
[43:59.300 --> 44:07.060]  Attention, an important product from hempusa.org, micro plant powder, will change your life
[44:07.060 --> 44:12.260]  by removing all types of positive toxins, such as heavy metals, parasites, bacteria,
[44:12.260 --> 44:17.500]  viruses, and fungus from the digestive tract and stomach wall so you can absorb nutrients.
[44:17.500 --> 44:22.820]  Micro plant powder is 89% silica and packed with a negative charge that attracts positive
[44:22.820 --> 44:26.100]  toxins from the blood, organs, spine, and brain.
[44:26.100 --> 44:30.900]  This product has the ability to rebuild cartilage and bone, which allows synovial fluid to return
[44:30.900 --> 44:31.900]  to the joints.
[44:31.900 --> 44:36.740]  Silica is a precursor to calcium, meaning the body turns silica into calcium and is
[44:36.740 --> 44:38.140]  great for the heart.
[44:38.140 --> 44:43.020]  There is no better time than now to have micro plant powder on your shelf or in your storage
[44:43.020 --> 44:47.340]  shelter, and with an unlimited shelf life, you can store it anywhere.
[44:47.340 --> 44:52.620]  Call 908-691-2608 or visit hempusa.org.
[44:52.620 --> 45:00.220]  It's a great way to change your life, so call 908-691-2608 or visit us at hempusa.org today.
[45:00.220 --> 45:20.140]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one?
[45:20.140 --> 45:37.620]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one?
[45:37.620 --> 46:03.340]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one?
[46:03.340 --> 46:25.980]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one?
[46:25.980 --> 46:45.460]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one?
[46:45.460 --> 47:05.380]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one?
[47:05.380 --> 47:30.180]  If you did not have any problems, where are you going to look for one?
[47:30.180 --> 47:36.140]  All the state constitutions I've looked at so far have an enacting clause, and if you
[47:36.140 --> 47:42.460]  will look at your red light camera statutes, you will see that though the state legislature
[47:42.460 --> 47:49.660]  creates the ability for the red light cameras to be put in, the management and regulating
[47:49.660 --> 47:56.180]  and rules associated with that camera are by ordinance, which as we sat here and talked
[47:56.180 --> 48:02.220]  about, since the enacting clause of the Constitution says that all laws must have this enacting
[48:02.220 --> 48:07.740]  clause, and here in Texas it specifically states that that law must be passed by the
[48:07.740 --> 48:14.780]  legislature, that right there would blow a red light camera out of the water, because
[48:14.780 --> 48:19.820]  its operation is through ordinance, not through state law.
[48:19.820 --> 48:22.660]  So right there, that would shoot them down.
[48:22.660 --> 48:28.460]  Now the bills of pains and penalties, by definition, I've had a guy that I'm talking to who is
[48:28.460 --> 48:34.260]  actually a law student who's wondering whether or not that argument would work, because the
[48:34.260 --> 48:41.940]  Supreme Court has a certain test they use to determine whether or not an alleged law
[48:41.940 --> 48:49.340]  falls under the requirements of a bill of pains and penalties, but every law dictionary
[48:49.340 --> 49:00.860]  I've gone through shows there are only two criteria, that it is administrative or legislative
[49:00.860 --> 49:09.500]  in construction, and that it is punitive without judicial review.
[49:09.500 --> 49:14.500]  That's the definition I have found for it in virtually every law dictionary reference
[49:14.500 --> 49:17.340]  and case I can find.
[49:17.340 --> 49:26.260]  So why the Supreme Court believes they have to concoct yet another lame brain methodology
[49:26.260 --> 49:33.780]  to allow loopholes in where no loopholes previously existed is beyond me.
[49:33.780 --> 49:39.700]  So as Randy put it once before, that's where we have to argue that the case law determinations
[49:39.700 --> 49:50.660]  are done so either against law or ineptly, because there's just no way around that.
[49:50.660 --> 49:57.540]  If it is legislative or administrative and punitive without judicial review, it's a
[49:57.540 --> 50:01.180]  bill of attainder.
[50:01.180 --> 50:05.980]  That's as plainly put as it's ever existed in the history of our nation, that is a bill
[50:05.980 --> 50:09.900]  of attainder.
[50:09.900 --> 50:10.900]  I hope that helps.
[50:10.900 --> 50:15.620]  But I would look for that enacting clause first and foremost, because that would blow
[50:15.620 --> 50:19.340]  ordinances right out of the water.
[50:19.340 --> 50:22.340]  Okay?
[50:22.340 --> 50:23.340]  Who's our next caller?
[50:23.340 --> 50:24.340]  Okay.
[50:24.340 --> 50:27.340]  We've got Jerry in Oregon.
[50:27.340 --> 50:31.700]  Jerry, thanks for calling in.
[50:31.700 --> 50:34.860]  Ladies and gentlemen, by the name of Carl Miller.
[50:34.860 --> 50:37.500]  I'm sorry, will you repeat that please?
[50:37.500 --> 50:42.260]  Have you ever heard of a gentleman by the name of Carl Miller?
[50:42.260 --> 50:45.340]  Jerry, listen, we're having a hard time hearing you.
[50:45.340 --> 50:51.820]  Are you on a speaker phone or some other kind of a strange phone or a Bluetooth or something?
[50:51.820 --> 50:53.660]  No, no.
[50:53.660 --> 50:56.780]  Okay, just try to hold the phone a little closer to your mouth.
[50:56.780 --> 50:59.460]  We're having a hard time hearing you.
[50:59.460 --> 51:04.460]  I was wondering if you'd ever heard of a gentleman by the name of Carl Miller from Michigan.
[51:04.460 --> 51:12.660]  Yes, I've heard of him, but I've never spoken to him directly.
[51:12.660 --> 51:20.260]  He has a video on Google called Know Your Constitution, and it deftails perfectly with
[51:20.260 --> 51:23.460]  everything that your whole show is about.
[51:23.460 --> 51:27.460]  Wow, and he's a pretty smart guy.
[51:27.460 --> 51:34.460]  Well, he's also a Vietnam theater vet, Randy, that's something that you share in common
[51:34.460 --> 51:35.460]  with him.
[51:35.460 --> 51:38.460]  Yeah, that means he's old.
[51:38.460 --> 51:47.740]  Well, I was just kind of wondering if maybe you guys had seen his work, because he talks
[51:47.740 --> 51:53.220]  about the enacting clauses that Eddie was just going over, and he talks about arguing
[51:53.220 --> 52:01.020]  the merits of the case based on Supreme Court decision, and I've been trying to figure out
[52:01.020 --> 52:09.180]  a way to get ahold of the guy so maybe he could be a guest on your show.
[52:09.180 --> 52:11.220]  I'm game if he's still around.
[52:11.220 --> 52:17.580]  Okay, well, I was just kind of wondering if you'd heard of him or not, but if not, take
[52:17.580 --> 52:23.860]  a look at that Google video called Know Your Constitution, and I think you'll really be
[52:23.860 --> 52:29.140]  impressed because he's talking about everything that you guys cover, and his video was put
[52:29.140 --> 52:31.660]  out 10 or 12 years ago.
[52:31.660 --> 52:33.380]  All right.
[52:33.380 --> 52:37.860]  So, anyway, thank you, that was all I had.
[52:37.860 --> 52:38.860]  Thank you very much.
[52:38.860 --> 52:42.500]  Yes, sir, thank you.
[52:42.500 --> 52:43.500]  Thank you.
[52:43.500 --> 52:47.740]  Okay, we are going to go now to Danny in Texas.
[52:47.740 --> 52:49.380]  Danny, thanks for calling in.
[52:49.380 --> 52:50.940]  What's on your mind tonight?
[52:50.940 --> 52:59.860]  Well, not the usual, but this is more for you and the archives and everything, because
[52:59.860 --> 53:04.980]  the Friday night show, looking for it in the archives, because I wanted to play the first
[53:04.980 --> 53:10.780]  segment at a meeting tomorrow night, and I'm not finding it there, and I'm just hoping
[53:10.780 --> 53:14.420]  to get it there where I can get it to the meeting tomorrow night.
[53:14.420 --> 53:15.420]  Sure.
[53:15.420 --> 53:21.900]  Well, yeah, I'm sorry, I'm having a few technical difficulties over the weekend.
[53:21.900 --> 53:25.380]  I'll try to get that up as soon as I can.
[53:25.380 --> 53:26.380]  Yeah, I appreciate it.
[53:26.380 --> 53:29.420]  I thought it must have been something, because you usually get them popped up there pretty
[53:29.420 --> 53:30.420]  quick.
[53:30.420 --> 53:33.420]  Like the next morning or something, I usually find them.
[53:33.420 --> 53:34.420]  Yeah.
[53:34.420 --> 53:36.420]  Yeah, we've had it working overtime.
[53:36.420 --> 53:37.420]  Yeah.
[53:37.420 --> 53:40.420]  Okay, that's all I had for right now.
[53:40.420 --> 53:45.100]  Actually, Danny, I got your email, and I sent you an email back about that.
[53:45.100 --> 53:46.100]  Oh, okay.
[53:46.100 --> 53:47.100]  Well, I haven't found it yet, but okay.
[53:47.100 --> 53:48.100]  Okay.
[53:48.100 --> 53:49.100]  Just check your email.
[53:49.100 --> 53:50.100]  All right.
[53:50.100 --> 53:51.100]  Thank you, then.
[53:51.100 --> 53:52.100]  Okay, thanks.
[53:52.100 --> 53:53.100]  Bye.
[53:53.100 --> 53:54.100]  All right.
[53:54.100 --> 53:59.340]  Who else we got?
[53:59.340 --> 54:00.620]  That's all for now.
[54:00.620 --> 54:01.620]  That's all for now?
[54:01.620 --> 54:03.100]  Oh, come on, folks.
[54:03.100 --> 54:06.420]  Surely I've got... I said something tonight that either crossed a few wires, straightened
[54:06.420 --> 54:08.420]  a few hairs, or made somebody laugh.
[54:08.420 --> 54:14.220]  Come on, call in, ask your questions, discuss whatever we talked about tonight, or one of
[54:14.220 --> 54:17.620]  the other shows, or just whatever you've got.
[54:17.620 --> 54:21.420]  In the meantime, I'm going to let Randy wake up and talk a little bit.
[54:21.420 --> 54:28.940]  I was trying to sound especially intelligent tonight.
[54:28.940 --> 54:32.820]  It's worked so far, but go ahead and blow that illusion.
[54:32.820 --> 54:33.820]  Let's go.
[54:33.820 --> 54:39.100]  Well, I'm getting ready, as a matter of fact, the sixth.
[54:39.100 --> 54:47.660]  I have a hearing over some traffic issues, and I'm trying to get all of these pieces
[54:47.660 --> 54:48.660]  put together.
[54:48.660 --> 54:57.460]  So far, I think I have the original way to go after them structured.
[54:57.460 --> 55:09.220]  We start out with asking the judge and the prosecutor for their oath of office, and their
[55:09.220 --> 55:14.660] ... not their oath of office, their licensed practice law.
[55:14.660 --> 55:19.020]  That ought to jerk a knot in their shorts, and they're going to blow past that, and I'm
[55:19.020 --> 55:31.260]  looking at asking the bailiff to arrest the judge and the prosecutor first, and if I don't
[55:31.260 --> 55:40.340]  get beat into unconsciousness and drug out of the courtroom, then we go to the authority
[55:40.340 --> 55:46.580]  of the oath of office and all those things, besides their license to practice law, which
[55:46.580 --> 55:49.660]  neither one of them have.
[55:49.660 --> 55:56.820]  Then we go to the city's authority to enforce the law, which in this case, Austin, is large
[55:56.820 --> 56:03.060]  enough that they'll be able to establish that.
[56:03.060 --> 56:05.980]  Then where do we go next?
[56:05.980 --> 56:08.220]  Do we go to the officer yet?
[56:08.220 --> 56:12.340]  We got anything in between, Eddie, that I'm missing?
[56:12.340 --> 56:13.340]  Okay.
[56:13.340 --> 56:17.620]  Okay, run down yourself one more time, to make sure I got what you said right.
[56:17.620 --> 56:24.060]  Yeah, I want the judge's license to practice law and their oath of office, all the Rule
[56:24.060 --> 56:25.260]  12 challenge stuff.
[56:25.260 --> 56:26.260]  All three O's, right?
[56:26.260 --> 56:27.260]  Yes.
[56:27.260 --> 56:29.260]  And there are four O's.
[56:29.260 --> 56:30.860]  No, there's three.
[56:30.860 --> 56:34.700]  There's the state constitution, the state anti-bribery, and the federal constitution.
[56:34.700 --> 56:35.700]  And the federal.
[56:35.700 --> 56:36.700]  I thought there were two federals.
[56:36.700 --> 56:37.700]  Okay.
[56:37.700 --> 56:40.460]  So we want all three.
[56:40.460 --> 56:48.180]  Judge practice, bar card, bar card they'll have, license they won't.
[56:48.180 --> 56:59.460]  Then we go to the, is there anything I've missed before we get to the officer's credentials?
[56:59.460 --> 57:02.300]  Since it's Austin and they've got over two million, no.
[57:02.300 --> 57:03.300]  Well.
[57:03.300 --> 57:04.300]  Where do they?
[57:04.300 --> 57:10.900]  There's only the own bodies of the judge and the prosecutor, but also the lawful authority
[57:10.900 --> 57:15.980]  of the prosecutor to prosecute the case.
[57:15.980 --> 57:16.980]  Right.
[57:16.980 --> 57:22.700]  The prosecutor has no authority to, oh, I need to find out if they're enforcing city
[57:22.700 --> 57:25.740]  ordinance or state law.
[57:25.740 --> 57:26.780]  Correct.
[57:26.780 --> 57:30.980]  And if it's the city attorney or a hired gun attorney acting in place of the city attorney.
[57:30.980 --> 57:35.940]  Yeah, in this case, it's going to be a city attorney that have got a whole bunch of them.
[57:35.940 --> 57:39.060]  Well, but here's the thing, now be aware of this.
[57:39.060 --> 57:46.000]  Most municipalities hire the city attorney on a day-to-day basis for prosecuting cases.
[57:46.000 --> 57:51.020]  They have a rotational software system they use that they've got all the local attorneys
[57:51.020 --> 57:58.460]  that wish to do this programmed into, and it's supposed to throw them out like lottery,
[57:58.460 --> 58:00.460]  except it takes them in a strict rotation.
[58:00.460 --> 58:02.900]  Well, you're talking about court-appointed counsel.
[58:02.900 --> 58:06.700]  No, I'm talking about the prosecutor.
[58:06.700 --> 58:07.700]  Interesting.
[58:07.700 --> 58:10.020]  They're not always permanently hired.
[58:10.020 --> 58:11.740]  Good question.
[58:11.740 --> 58:13.540]  Okay, good.
[58:13.540 --> 58:18.260]  We'll go back to that when we get back from break.
[58:18.260 --> 58:23.940]  This is Randy Kelton, Eddie Stevens, Eddie Stevens, I owed you that one.
[58:23.940 --> 58:31.900]  Eddie Craig, Debra Stevens, the rule of law radio, the call lines are open, looks like
[58:31.900 --> 58:33.900]  we've got a couple of calls.
[58:33.900 --> 58:38.140]  Wendy from Tennessee, where has she been?
[58:38.140 --> 58:39.140]  My sweetheart.
[58:39.140 --> 58:47.820]  We'll take Wendy when we come back and then Ken from Texas, this is, I already said that.
[58:47.820 --> 58:54.820]  Anyway, we'll be...
[59:17.980 --> 59:21.980]  Okay.
[59:21.980 --> 59:25.980]  Okay.
[59:25.980 --> 59:29.980]  Okay.
[59:29.980 --> 59:33.980]  Okay.
[59:33.980 --> 59:37.980]  Okay.
[59:37.980 --> 59:41.980]  Okay.
[59:41.980 --> 59:47.980]  Okay.
[59:47.980 --> 59:51.980]  Okay.
[59:51.980 --> 59:55.980]  Okay.
[59:55.980 --> 59:59.980]  Okay.
[59:59.980 --> 01:00:03.980]  Okay.
[01:00:03.980 --> 01:00:05.980]  Okay.
[01:00:05.980 --> 01:00:11.980]  Okay.
[01:00:36.300 --> 01:00:40.300]  Okay.
[01:00:40.300 --> 01:00:44.300]  Okay.
[01:00:44.300 --> 01:00:48.300]  Okay.
[01:00:48.300 --> 01:00:52.300]  Okay.
[01:00:57.020 --> 01:01:01.020]  Okay.
[01:01:01.020 --> 01:01:05.420]  Journalist Gordon Duff says the website, Site Intelligence, rumored to be the voice of the
[01:01:05.420 --> 01:01:10.860]  Mossad, has placed the blame for the failed Times Square bombing on the Pakistani Taliban.
[01:01:10.860 --> 01:01:15.740]  Duff says this is the same group that has come up with numerous bin Laden audio tapes.
[01:01:15.740 --> 01:01:20.340]  Duff says although tiny and nearly totally unstaffed, whenever it is convenient for Israel
[01:01:20.340 --> 01:01:25.300]  to point a finger at someone, Site Intelligence, run by former Israel Defense Forces soldier
[01:01:25.300 --> 01:01:29.260]  Rita Katz, makes another unbelievable intelligence find.
[01:01:29.260 --> 01:01:34.420]  Duff says Site Intelligence finds are not only timely for Israel, but always tend to support
[01:01:34.420 --> 01:01:39.780]  mysterious organizations run from the Afghan and Pakistani border region.
[01:01:39.780 --> 01:01:44.580]  After the demise of Iraq, now eliminated as an Israeli competitor, all eyes turned to
[01:01:44.580 --> 01:01:47.580]  Pakistan, Islam's only nuclear state.
[01:01:47.580 --> 01:01:53.140]  To establish footholds to destabilize Pakistan, a pro-Indian Israeli government under President
[01:01:53.140 --> 01:02:00.180]  Hamid Karzai was installed in Kabul.
[01:02:00.180 --> 01:02:05.140]  Twice a week, a caravan of trucks lumbers out of Peshawar, northwest Pakistan, en route
[01:02:05.140 --> 01:02:11.180]  to Afghanistan, loaded with one of the most coveted substances, ammonium nitrate fertilizer.
[01:02:11.180 --> 01:02:17.300]  The LA Times reports the illicit caravan moves unhindered along the park Afghan highway,
[01:02:17.300 --> 01:02:22.180]  thanks to a string of bribes paid to police, politicians and bureaucrats.
[01:02:22.180 --> 01:02:27.700]  A single night shipment can move 85 tons, banned in Afghanistan.
[01:02:27.700 --> 01:02:32.100]  Ammonium nitrate is the basic ingredient of the Taliban's roadside bombs.
[01:02:32.100 --> 01:02:36.180]  The trucking owner said, quote, I know it's used to kill American soldiers, but people
[01:02:36.180 --> 01:02:40.980]  in the tribal areas don't have any choice but to do this, adding, quote, if they would
[01:02:40.980 --> 01:02:43.940]  give us another way to make money, we would take it.
[01:02:43.940 --> 01:02:48.300]  Western forces have suffered 361 deaths from roadside bombs.
[01:02:48.300 --> 01:02:53.740]  A shipment of 85 tons of ammonium nitrate could yield more than 2,500 bombs.
[01:03:18.300 --> 01:03:33.740]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty, I read his book and he says he cares not for
[01:03:33.740 --> 01:03:42.740]  the unsightly, These warm hunters come by that term rightly,
[01:03:42.740 --> 01:03:49.740]  I won't pay for the war with my body, Ain't gonna pay for the car with my money,
[01:03:49.740 --> 01:03:58.740]  I won't pay for the fun with my body, Their plans wicked and their logic shoddy,
[01:03:58.740 --> 01:04:06.740]  Ain't gonna pay for the oil with my body, I won't pay for the boys with my money,
[01:04:06.740 --> 01:04:13.740]  Ain't gonna pay for the kids with my body, Their whole agenda smells funny,
[01:04:13.740 --> 01:04:27.740]  I won't fight in a war of my own, That one would be led back to the throne,
[01:04:27.740 --> 01:04:37.740]  I won't pay for a war of my own, They live in glass houses so I can watch them
[01:04:37.740 --> 01:04:43.740]  throw gold, I won't fight in a war I can win,
[01:04:43.740 --> 01:04:50.740]  I can never win the one that they have me in, That one I lose long before it begins,
[01:04:50.740 --> 01:05:00.740]  I won't pay for a war I can win, When I'm fighting in my own war,
[01:05:00.740 --> 01:05:14.740]  It's such a peaceful feeling, When I'm paying for my own war,
[01:05:14.740 --> 01:05:24.740]  I take time for the healing, Yeah,
[01:05:24.740 --> 01:05:34.740]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty, I read his book and he says he cares not
[01:05:34.740 --> 01:05:44.740]  for the unsightly, These fear mongers come by that time rightly,
[01:05:44.740 --> 01:05:52.740]  Yeah, Yeah
[01:05:52.740 --> 01:05:58.740]  Okay, we are back, the rule of law.
[01:05:58.740 --> 01:06:04.740]  We're going to your calls now, we've got Wendy in Tennessee, Ken and Dan,
[01:06:04.740 --> 01:06:05.740]  we're gonna go to Wendy.
[01:06:05.740 --> 01:06:08.740]  Wendy, thanks for calling in, what's on your mind tonight?
[01:06:08.740 --> 01:06:10.740]  Hey, how y'all doing tonight?
[01:06:10.740 --> 01:06:11.740]  Pretty good.
[01:06:11.740 --> 01:06:16.740]  Well, I was...
[01:06:16.740 --> 01:06:17.740]  That was short.
[01:06:17.740 --> 01:06:19.740]  Wendy?
[01:06:19.740 --> 01:06:22.740]  Wendy, go ahead.
[01:06:22.740 --> 01:06:24.740]  Sorry, we dropped you for a second, go ahead.
[01:06:24.740 --> 01:06:30.740]  Okay, anyway, I'll go back to where I was talking about, on APA with not only traffic,
[01:06:30.740 --> 01:06:35.740]  but errors with the Tennessee Department of Agriculture, of course, as usual,
[01:06:35.740 --> 01:06:38.740]  they have...
[01:06:38.740 --> 01:06:44.740]  Well, we're in the process of suing them, okay, because they've had some problems.
[01:06:44.740 --> 01:06:48.740]  I've just got distracted for a second, I can't think of where I'm going to,
[01:06:48.740 --> 01:06:51.740]  but I'm going to go to another subject because it's on my mind, okay?
[01:06:51.740 --> 01:06:55.740]  On these arrest warrants, I've got errors in several other peoples,
[01:06:55.740 --> 01:07:01.740]  and this is in the city, okay, municipality, a mayoral city,
[01:07:01.740 --> 01:07:04.740]  that lies in Blount County, right?
[01:07:04.740 --> 01:07:08.740]  On these arrest warrants, on the probable cause determination,
[01:07:08.740 --> 01:07:12.740]  a little area, it's based on the affidavit of complaint,
[01:07:12.740 --> 01:07:16.740]  I find there's probable cause to believe that on the date set for above
[01:07:16.740 --> 01:07:19.740]  in Coffey County, Tennessee.
[01:07:19.740 --> 01:07:22.740]  Where is Coffey County?
[01:07:22.740 --> 01:07:26.740]  Why do they do that?
[01:07:26.740 --> 01:07:31.740]  Well, as I understand, if it's similar to Texas,
[01:07:31.740 --> 01:07:39.740]  any magistrate can take any complaint, felony or misdemeanor, within the state,
[01:07:39.740 --> 01:07:43.740]  and then they forward, they can issue a warrant and then forward the complaint
[01:07:43.740 --> 01:07:49.740]  to the clerk of the court of jurisdiction that has original jurisdiction.
[01:07:49.740 --> 01:07:53.740]  But this is a Blount County magistrate who's on this, okay?
[01:07:53.740 --> 01:07:59.740]  Yeah, any magistrate in the state can take a complaint for any crime in the state.
[01:07:59.740 --> 01:08:04.740]  All they can do is issue a warrant and then they're to forward the records
[01:08:04.740 --> 01:08:09.740]  to the clerk of the court of original jurisdiction.
[01:08:09.740 --> 01:08:14.740]  Just the way it is in Texas, and most likely that way in Tennessee,
[01:08:14.740 --> 01:08:22.740]  that's where if a guy's in Chattanooga and he's committed a crime in Memphis
[01:08:22.740 --> 01:08:26.740]  and someone sees him in Chattanooga and goes to the JP and says,
[01:08:26.740 --> 01:08:30.740]  this guy committed a crime in Memphis and files a complaint,
[01:08:30.740 --> 01:08:35.740]  since it's in the same state, the magistrate can issue a warrant
[01:08:35.740 --> 01:08:38.740]  and have him arrested and taken back to Memphis.
[01:08:38.740 --> 01:08:41.740]  Okay, this is signed by a judicial commissioner, okay?
[01:08:41.740 --> 01:08:45.740]  These are all of these arrest warrants of different people.
[01:08:45.740 --> 01:08:49.740]  It's Coffee County, Tennessee.
[01:08:49.740 --> 01:08:54.740]  Are they claiming that the offense occurred in Coffee County?
[01:08:54.740 --> 01:08:58.740]  It says, I'll read this little statement, a probable cause determination.
[01:08:58.740 --> 01:09:03.740]  Based on the affidavit of a complaint, I find there is probable cause to believe
[01:09:03.740 --> 01:09:07.740]  that on the date set forth above in Coffee County, Tennessee,
[01:09:07.740 --> 01:09:11.740]  the defendant committed offenses or violation of TCA,
[01:09:11.740 --> 01:09:18.740]  this one is 43-6-104, force and effect.
[01:09:18.740 --> 01:09:21.740]  But the other ones are all Coffee County too.
[01:09:21.740 --> 01:09:23.740]  What is the nature of these allegations?
[01:09:23.740 --> 01:09:29.740]  The nature of these allegations is movement of other materials, okay?
[01:09:29.740 --> 01:09:36.740]  This is bills, it's moving live organisms or other materials capable of harboring plants.
[01:09:36.740 --> 01:09:42.740]  It's actually rules and regulations, it's not criminal offense.
[01:09:42.740 --> 01:09:47.740]  They're issuing warrants for violating rules and regulations?
[01:09:47.740 --> 01:09:51.740]  Oh, yeah, they put G-button jail too for them.
[01:09:51.740 --> 01:09:59.740]  Is it alleged that the offense occurred in Coffee County?
[01:09:59.740 --> 01:10:03.740]  No, it's in Blount County.
[01:10:03.740 --> 01:10:08.740]  Well, now, wait a minute, doesn't that complaint you just read say that you have reason
[01:10:08.740 --> 01:10:12.740]  or they have reason to believe and do believe that in that county you committed that offense
[01:10:12.740 --> 01:10:14.740]  or someone committed that offense?
[01:10:14.740 --> 01:10:19.740]  Absolutely, and every one of these risk warrants from everybody, you know,
[01:10:19.740 --> 01:10:24.740]  that was charged in Blount County, it says Coffee County, Tennessee.
[01:10:24.740 --> 01:10:26.740]  Okay, well, then you have a defective complaint.
[01:10:26.740 --> 01:10:28.740]  Mm-hmm.
[01:10:28.740 --> 01:10:32.740]  Was the warrant issued in Blount County?
[01:10:32.740 --> 01:10:36.740]  Yes.
[01:10:36.740 --> 01:10:39.740]  But, Wendy, you do know that if you'll check your statutes,
[01:10:39.740 --> 01:10:42.740]  there may be a charge of aggravated perjury in there.
[01:10:42.740 --> 01:10:45.740]  Oh, there is.
[01:10:45.740 --> 01:10:48.740]  I know that one.
[01:10:48.740 --> 01:10:49.740]  Yeah, there is.
[01:10:49.740 --> 01:10:51.740]  Is that not wild?
[01:10:51.740 --> 01:10:55.740]  But everybody, I've got like five, six different risk warrants,
[01:10:55.740 --> 01:10:58.740]  and it all says Coffee County, Tennessee.
[01:10:58.740 --> 01:11:01.740]  Are they committing fraud on everybody?
[01:11:01.740 --> 01:11:04.740]  Coffee County, Tennessee cannot have original jurisdiction
[01:11:04.740 --> 01:11:09.740]  on an act allegedly committed in Blount County, Tennessee.
[01:11:09.740 --> 01:11:13.740]  Absolutely.
[01:11:13.740 --> 01:11:17.740]  So, if Coffee County, if they arrested you in Blount,
[01:11:17.740 --> 01:11:24.740]  they would have to transport you to Coffee, and Coffee would have a problem.
[01:11:24.740 --> 01:11:27.740]  Absolutely.
[01:11:27.740 --> 01:11:33.740]  Have these complaints been forwarded to any magistrate in Coffee County?
[01:11:33.740 --> 01:11:34.740]  Not that I know of.
[01:11:34.740 --> 01:11:37.740]  I need to check on Coffee County, then.
[01:11:37.740 --> 01:11:40.740]  I would sure want to talk to Coffee County about this.
[01:11:40.740 --> 01:11:41.740]  Mm-hmm.
[01:11:41.740 --> 01:11:48.740]  Because if you get arrested on these, you're going to sue Coffee County.
[01:11:48.740 --> 01:11:51.740]  Yeah, I need to get to Oath of Office Barbara,
[01:11:51.740 --> 01:12:00.740]  and this judicial commissioner, too, she signed it.
[01:12:00.740 --> 01:12:04.740]  So she actually committed false swearing and perjury.
[01:12:04.740 --> 01:12:05.740]  It sure sounds that way.
[01:12:05.740 --> 01:12:07.740]  Mm-hmm.
[01:12:07.740 --> 01:12:10.740]  It says this offense occurred in Blount County, Tennessee.
[01:12:10.740 --> 01:12:18.740]  This offense is a Class A misdemeanor set out in the TCA 43-6X112.
[01:12:18.740 --> 01:12:23.740]  It says on the document that the offense occurred in Blount County?
[01:12:23.740 --> 01:12:29.740]  Yeah, in the affidavit of complaint.
[01:12:29.740 --> 01:12:31.740]  My, this is interesting.
[01:12:31.740 --> 01:12:32.740]  Mm-hmm.
[01:12:32.740 --> 01:12:36.740]  So the complaint alleges Blount.
[01:12:36.740 --> 01:12:39.740]  Who put Coffee on there, and why?
[01:12:39.740 --> 01:12:41.740]  I don't know. Why?
[01:12:41.740 --> 01:12:47.740]  These guys, it sounds like they're going out of their way to screw these things up.
[01:12:47.740 --> 01:12:48.740]  You have no idea.
[01:12:48.740 --> 01:12:53.740]  The things I found, I mean, I asked for the bonds,
[01:12:53.740 --> 01:13:00.740]  and it took me a while to get the bonds, and these bonds were written in 1979.
[01:13:00.740 --> 01:13:07.740]  And these people wasn't elected until like 2006.
[01:13:07.740 --> 01:13:10.740]  Wait, I'm having some technical difficulty.
[01:13:10.740 --> 01:13:12.740]  I missed part of that.
[01:13:12.740 --> 01:13:19.740]  The bonds, their surety bonds are 1979 surety bonds
[01:13:19.740 --> 01:13:25.740]  with people that was not elected or appointed until 2006.
[01:13:25.740 --> 01:13:28.740]  My, that's what I keep saying.
[01:13:28.740 --> 01:13:33.740]  The deeper you dig, the uglier it gets.
[01:13:33.740 --> 01:13:35.740]  It's like these people go out of their way
[01:13:35.740 --> 01:13:39.740]  to create as big a mess for themselves as they possibly can.
[01:13:39.740 --> 01:13:42.740]  Well, when we asked for the open records request on their surety bonds
[01:13:42.740 --> 01:13:46.740]  and oath of offices for the City of Maryland employees,
[01:13:46.740 --> 01:13:49.740]  they said that they didn't have any.
[01:13:49.740 --> 01:13:52.740]  Well, when we sent them a copy of their charter,
[01:13:52.740 --> 01:13:54.740]  they said they were supposed to have one.
[01:13:54.740 --> 01:13:58.740]  They came up with these bonds and stuff for 1979.
[01:13:58.740 --> 01:14:03.740]  You should move for co-warranto removal from office.
[01:14:03.740 --> 01:14:05.740]  Well, that goes to the whole city.
[01:14:05.740 --> 01:14:08.740]  Yeah. That'll work.
[01:14:08.740 --> 01:14:11.740]  It will. Oh, yeah.
[01:14:11.740 --> 01:14:15.740]  See, in one of our last court cases, right,
[01:14:15.740 --> 01:14:18.740]  Melanie Day was the city attorney.
[01:14:18.740 --> 01:14:21.740]  You know, she got up and testified she was the city attorney
[01:14:21.740 --> 01:14:26.740]  because they had one of Bill's cases there, right, where they was after him.
[01:14:26.740 --> 01:14:27.740]  And she jumped up.
[01:14:27.740 --> 01:14:29.740]  She said, I'm the city of Maryville's attorney,
[01:14:29.740 --> 01:14:31.740]  and I have nothing on the docket today.
[01:14:31.740 --> 01:14:34.740]  Why is she representing the county official in her capacity?
[01:14:34.740 --> 01:14:38.740]  She's city of Maryville attorney.
[01:14:38.740 --> 01:14:41.740]  Is there a restriction?
[01:14:41.740 --> 01:14:49.740]  Okay, city attorneys may be able to practice law outside, just being a city attorney.
[01:14:49.740 --> 01:14:56.740]  In Texas, a county or district attorney is not allowed to practice law.
[01:14:56.740 --> 01:14:59.740]  But I think municipal attorneys are.
[01:14:59.740 --> 01:15:08.740]  Okay. And well, which is weird is when I asked for the contract of that city attorney,
[01:15:08.740 --> 01:15:10.740]  she's not the city attorney.
[01:15:10.740 --> 01:15:12.740]  Another man is David Black.
[01:15:12.740 --> 01:15:15.740]  How did he get there?
[01:15:15.740 --> 01:15:18.740]  And she's representing herself as a city attorney.
[01:15:18.740 --> 01:15:20.740]  That's impersonating a public official.
[01:15:20.740 --> 01:15:22.740]  Absolutely.
[01:15:22.740 --> 01:15:27.740]  Somehow I'm not surprised that you didn't miss that one.
[01:15:27.740 --> 01:15:30.740]  It's constantly beating up on these people, you know.
[01:15:30.740 --> 01:15:32.740]  So I wrote to the governor.
[01:15:32.740 --> 01:15:40.740]  Of course, the governor sent me a bogus letter back to an Olson, Garth Olson.
[01:15:40.740 --> 01:15:43.740]  So is that your surname?
[01:15:43.740 --> 01:15:44.740]  Well, it must be.
[01:15:44.740 --> 01:15:46.740]  It must be my split personality.
[01:15:46.740 --> 01:15:49.740]  But yes, I thought that was interesting because I told him,
[01:15:49.740 --> 01:15:52.740]  and it was his responsibility, and I was going to sue his butt
[01:15:52.740 --> 01:16:04.740]  because this APA, the Department of Agriculture Department, is under his duty, his care.
[01:16:04.740 --> 01:16:06.740]  Well, they didn't give me administrative hearing,
[01:16:06.740 --> 01:16:09.740]  and all the times they arrested us and everything else,
[01:16:09.740 --> 01:16:14.740]  and on their rules and regulations, it must be a civil warning.
[01:16:14.740 --> 01:16:17.740]  Oh, Wendy, you are still having far too much fun.
[01:16:17.740 --> 01:16:21.740]  We're about to run out of time, and the phone lines are filling up.
[01:16:21.740 --> 01:16:23.740]  I am so glad to hear from you.
[01:16:23.740 --> 01:16:24.740]  It's been such a long time.
[01:16:24.740 --> 01:16:27.740]  Well, I'll call back another day, but I will figure this one out.
[01:16:27.740 --> 01:16:29.740]  Thank you.
[01:16:29.740 --> 01:16:31.740]  Because I told the governor I want all these people removed from office
[01:16:31.740 --> 01:16:34.740]  and arrested at once.
[01:16:34.740 --> 01:16:36.740]  Well, look up poor Wanto.
[01:16:36.740 --> 01:16:37.740]  Okay, I sure will.
[01:16:37.740 --> 01:16:38.740]  I'll talk to y'all later.
[01:16:38.740 --> 01:16:39.740]  Bye.
[01:16:39.740 --> 01:16:40.740]  Thank you, Wendy.
[01:16:40.740 --> 01:16:41.740]  Okay, bye.
[01:16:41.740 --> 01:16:45.740]  This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig.
[01:16:45.740 --> 01:16:51.740]  We'll be taking more calls on the other side.
[01:16:51.740 --> 01:16:53.740]  We've got Ken, Dan, and Mark.
[01:16:53.740 --> 01:17:00.740]  We'll take you as soon as we get back.
[01:17:00.740 --> 01:17:03.740]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM,
[01:17:03.740 --> 01:17:06.740]  but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy,
[01:17:06.740 --> 01:17:09.740]  and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[01:17:09.740 --> 01:17:12.740]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[01:17:12.740 --> 01:17:13.740]  Brave New Books?
[01:17:13.740 --> 01:17:16.740]  Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for
[01:17:16.740 --> 01:17:19.740]  by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and G. Edward Griffin.
[01:17:19.740 --> 01:17:23.740]  They even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[01:17:23.740 --> 01:17:26.740]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[01:17:26.740 --> 01:17:27.740]  Go check it out for yourself.
[01:17:27.740 --> 01:17:31.740]  It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[01:17:31.740 --> 01:17:35.740]  By UT, there's never anywhere to park down there.
[01:17:35.740 --> 01:17:38.740]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers
[01:17:38.740 --> 01:17:42.740]  at the 500 MLK parking facility, just behind the bookstore.
[01:17:42.740 --> 01:17:46.740]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[01:17:46.740 --> 01:17:51.740]  Monday through Saturday, 11 AM to 9 PM, and 1 to 6 PM on Sundays.
[01:17:51.740 --> 01:17:55.740]  So give them a call at 512-480-2503,
[01:17:55.740 --> 01:18:20.740]  or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[01:18:25.740 --> 01:18:30.740]  I was blindsided, but now I can see your plans
[01:18:30.740 --> 01:18:35.740]  You put the fear in my pocket, took the money from my hands
[01:18:35.740 --> 01:18:44.740]  Ain't gonna fool me with that same old trick again
[01:18:44.740 --> 01:19:00.740]  Ain't gonna...
[01:19:00.740 --> 01:19:05.740]  Ain't gonna drive me with that same old sucker punch
[01:19:05.740 --> 01:19:10.740]  I get it now, but then I must have been out of touch
[01:19:10.740 --> 01:19:15.740]  Back then you had room to move, but now you're feeling the crunch
[01:19:15.740 --> 01:19:36.740]  Ain't gonna get me with that same old sucker punch
[01:19:36.740 --> 01:19:40.740]  Ain't gonna...
[01:19:40.740 --> 01:19:45.740]  Ain't gonna please me with that same old sad man song
[01:19:45.740 --> 01:19:50.740]  You thought you were right, but now you got it all wrong
[01:19:50.740 --> 01:19:55.740]  It was a weak moment for me, but I had the power all along
[01:19:55.740 --> 01:20:20.740]  Ain't gonna please me with that same old sad man song
[01:20:20.740 --> 01:20:25.740]  Ain't gonna bore me with that same old bundle of lies
[01:20:25.740 --> 01:20:30.740]  Your arrogance is absurd, don't know why you even try
[01:20:30.740 --> 01:20:35.740]  I'm gonna see my sweet republic reanalyze
[01:20:35.740 --> 01:20:41.740]  Ain't gonna blind me with that same old bucket of lies
[01:20:41.740 --> 01:20:52.740]  Okay, we're taking our calls. We've got Ken, Dan, and Marcus. Ken, thanks for calling in. What's on your mind tonight?
[01:20:52.740 --> 01:21:09.740]  Hi there. Yeah, this is Ken in Texas, and I wanted to see if Randy could tell us a little bit more information about the requirement that we are brought before a magistrate.
[01:21:09.740 --> 01:21:24.740]  And I've heard bits and pieces over it, but I was hoping he could kind of go into the significance of how it hurts us if we don't go to a magistrate and how it helps them.
[01:21:24.740 --> 01:21:31.740]  Okay, I'll give a good example. I was arrested at the Secretary of State's building.
[01:21:31.740 --> 01:21:41.740]  And the reason I was arrested is because a sergeant on the DPS lost his cool and acted really ignorant.
[01:21:41.740 --> 01:21:55.740]  Now, had he known that if he arrested me for any reason, he would have to take me directly to the nearest magistrate and explain himself,
[01:21:55.740 --> 01:22:07.740]  he would have been a lot more careful. But as it was, he could have me arrested and thrown in jail all night, and then they'd just let me out the next day with no charges.
[01:22:07.740 --> 01:22:14.740]  So now I'm going after him, and I may wind up ending his career.
[01:22:14.740 --> 01:22:26.740]  It was intended that the police have the power to arrest for an on-site offense if it's involved violence.
[01:22:26.740 --> 01:22:31.740]  And Eddie and I have discussed that part on disorderly conduct.
[01:22:31.740 --> 01:22:38.740]  But it was not intended that the police officer hold the key to the jailhouse door.
[01:22:38.740 --> 01:22:47.740]  He could arrest, but he was required to take the person directly to the nearest magistrate and explain himself.
[01:22:47.740 --> 01:22:58.740]  And it's not because they didn't trust the police. They wanted the public not to fear the police.
[01:22:58.740 --> 01:23:00.740]  This would be the examining trial.
[01:23:00.740 --> 01:23:09.740]  Examining trial, right. Magistration, if you type Magistration into Microsoft Word, it'll pull a little red line under it.
[01:23:09.740 --> 01:23:10.740]  Right.
[01:23:10.740 --> 01:23:11.740]  Doesn't recognize it.
[01:23:11.740 --> 01:23:13.740]  That's part of the scam, isn't it?
[01:23:13.740 --> 01:23:21.740]  That is exactly part of the scam. That's something they made up. It's not in the book.
[01:23:21.740 --> 01:23:34.740]  In the book, there is examining trial. And examining trial is a whole chapter in the Code of Criminal Procedure that stipulates how an examining trial is to be done.
[01:23:34.740 --> 01:23:43.740]  And if anybody has any question, go to New York. They do it. They do it precisely how they're supposed to.
[01:23:43.740 --> 01:23:56.740]  They hold you long enough to get you an attorney appointed, and they have attorneys that they appoint for that specific purpose and that purpose only.
[01:23:56.740 --> 01:24:02.740]  And it's in Texas state law that the courts authorize to do that.
[01:24:02.740 --> 01:24:07.740]  They hold you long enough to get an attorney appointed, and then they bring you before the magistrate.
[01:24:07.740 --> 01:24:15.740]  The prosecutor tells his side. Your attorney tells your side. The judge decides whether or not you answer the charge.
[01:24:15.740 --> 01:24:20.740]  That's how it should be. Had that happened in my case, they'd have tossed it.
[01:24:20.740 --> 01:24:29.740]  And then the prosecution wouldn't have had to go through all those contortions and then wind up having me sue the crapola out of them.
[01:24:29.740 --> 01:24:33.740]  Had that been in place, this would not have happened.
[01:24:33.740 --> 01:24:46.740]  If the police officer is commanded to take you directly to a magistrate and the magistrate is commanded to do an examining trial, we cannot have a police state.
[01:24:46.740 --> 01:24:51.740]  In Texas law, is there an exclusion where they do not have to give you one?
[01:24:51.740 --> 01:24:55.740]  No. There is no exclusion.
[01:24:55.740 --> 01:25:01.740]  So they've created one on their own behalf to say that they limit those to felonies only.
[01:25:01.740 --> 01:25:04.740]  They just made that up. That's not in law anywhere.
[01:25:04.740 --> 01:25:09.740]  Right. That's what I'm saying. They created it on their own behalf, but it's not in the law.
[01:25:09.740 --> 01:25:13.740]  Yeah. They just decided, well, we don't want to bother.
[01:25:13.740 --> 01:25:17.740]  So if it's a felony, even then they don't.
[01:25:17.740 --> 01:25:21.740]  You know, they say that, but they don't give you an examining trial anyway.
[01:25:21.740 --> 01:25:27.740]  Because what they say is, is after indictment, you don't have a right to an examining trial.
[01:25:27.740 --> 01:25:39.740]  Well, that's true. The problem is, if a felony is presented to a grand jury and the grand jury finds a true bill,
[01:25:39.740 --> 01:25:54.740]  2022 says that the true bill cannot be recorded in the minutes of the court until the clerk issues a capious and the person is arrested.
[01:25:54.740 --> 01:26:00.740]  When the person is arrested, he must have an examining trial.
[01:26:00.740 --> 01:26:05.740]  So there can't be an indictment until the person's been arrested.
[01:26:05.740 --> 01:26:10.740]  If he's been arrested, then by statute, he had a right to an examining trial.
[01:26:10.740 --> 01:26:18.740]  There would already been one. So after indictment, of course, you don't have a right to examine trial. You already had one.
[01:26:18.740 --> 01:26:26.740]  But what they have done is turned that on its head and said, well, after indictment, you don't have a right to an examining trial.
[01:26:26.740 --> 01:26:29.740]  Therefore, we don't have to give you one before indictment.
[01:26:29.740 --> 01:26:38.740]  Well, I don't know how they got to that logic. That's not even specious logic. That's stupid logic.
[01:26:38.740 --> 01:26:44.740]  How does that effect tie into the rules of evidence?
[01:26:44.740 --> 01:26:48.740]  The rules of evidence would only go to Miranda.
[01:26:48.740 --> 01:27:01.740]  It wouldn't go to this particular issue other than if the officer fails to take him before magistrate, he becomes a criminal.
[01:27:01.740 --> 01:27:07.740]  And as a criminal, then he's disqualified as a credible witness.
[01:27:07.740 --> 01:27:13.740]  And any evidence they may discover after he's violated a due process right,
[01:27:13.740 --> 01:27:18.740]  the officer himself being disqualified, he can't bring that evidence.
[01:27:18.740 --> 01:27:23.740]  At least that's the rules of evidence. That's not by the way they actually do it.
[01:27:23.740 --> 01:27:27.740]  The courts right now really don't care.
[01:27:27.740 --> 01:27:38.740]  OK. Well, I thought there might have been an exclusion of evidence if it's just brought right into the court without going through a magistrate.
[01:27:38.740 --> 01:27:41.740]  No, not necessarily.
[01:27:41.740 --> 01:27:50.740]  If the evidence wasn't secured consequent to the arrest or subsequent to the arrest,
[01:27:50.740 --> 01:27:57.740]  if they questioned you without reading you your rights, that's really where that goes to.
[01:27:57.740 --> 01:28:09.740]  The only other issue of not bringing before a magistrate is whether or not the officer himself is qualified to testify because he becomes a criminal.
[01:28:09.740 --> 01:28:24.740]  And so we can claim that the witness is, what's the term, you disqualify the witness as a credible witness.
[01:28:24.740 --> 01:28:33.740]  But other than that, it doesn't really go to the evidence unless they fail to read you your rights
[01:28:33.740 --> 01:28:41.740]  and then questioned you and secured evidence that they would intend to bring into court.
[01:28:41.740 --> 01:28:48.740]  Well, are they still taking people directly to jail and then holding them while the prosecutor tries to make a plea bargain?
[01:28:48.740 --> 01:28:54.740]  Absolutely. It's a matter of policy.
[01:28:54.740 --> 01:29:03.740]  And as soon as I get through these court cases in the city of Austin, we're going to go to court and we're going to talk about that in a civil trial.
[01:29:03.740 --> 01:29:05.740]  Big one.
[01:29:05.740 --> 01:29:16.740]  It seems to me that the prosecutor or that position, not the one person, but that position has created this perfect storm because it's convenient for him.
[01:29:16.740 --> 01:29:23.740]  Exactly. That's exactly what my real habeas corpus goes to. I accuse the prosecutor of everything.
[01:29:23.740 --> 01:29:27.740]  We're about to go to break here and the calls are really stacking up.
[01:29:27.740 --> 01:29:29.740]  Okay. Thank you for going into that, Randy.
[01:29:29.740 --> 01:29:34.740]  Thanks. That's a good question. And I don't go through that often enough.
[01:29:34.740 --> 01:29:39.740]  I need to go back and run back through the due process stuff some more.
[01:29:39.740 --> 01:30:00.740]  Okay. This is Randy Kelton, Deborah Stevens, Eddie Craig, Rule of Law Radio. We'll be back and take Dan, Marcus, Pat, Jim on the other side.
[01:30:00.740 --> 01:30:04.740]  My name is Randall Kelton and I co-host on Rule of Law Radio.
[01:30:04.740 --> 01:30:09.740]  We specialize in showing people how to strike back against corrupt public officials.
[01:30:09.740 --> 01:30:15.740]  With the mortgage crisis worsening, we set our sights on finding a remedy for people who have been cheated by their lenders.
[01:30:15.740 --> 01:30:22.740]  If you have a mortgage or have paid yours off, you have probably been cheated out of thousands, but there is a remedy.
[01:30:22.740 --> 01:30:37.740]  Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call me at 512-430-4140 and find out how to use the consumer protection laws to recover what the lenders have stolen through fraud and deception.
[01:30:37.740 --> 01:30:43.740]  We will prepare for you a qualified written request that will expose the fraud and put the lenders on the dime.
[01:30:43.740 --> 01:30:48.740]  Lender fraud is bankrupting this country and it's time to fight back.
[01:30:48.740 --> 01:31:00.740]  Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call 512-430-4140 and get the information you need to stop the money changers in their tracks.
[01:31:00.740 --> 01:31:05.740]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:31:05.740 --> 01:31:09.740]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears Proven Method.
[01:31:09.740 --> 01:31:15.740]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[01:31:15.740 --> 01:31:21.740]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:31:21.740 --> 01:31:25.740]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[01:31:25.740 --> 01:31:27.740]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[01:31:27.740 --> 01:31:29.740]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[01:31:29.740 --> 01:31:34.740]  How to turn your financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:31:34.740 --> 01:31:39.740]  The Michael Mears Proven Method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:31:39.740 --> 01:31:41.740]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:31:41.740 --> 01:31:50.740]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:31:50.740 --> 01:32:01.740]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:32:01.740 --> 01:32:11.740]  Yeah, who you want to check? Could you take me for free, Tony? What do you want, chick? I'm not free, Tony. You can't check me. Oh, I'm sorry.
[01:32:11.740 --> 01:32:15.740]  Don't let them check you in the morning. Check you in the evening. Put a check in your body.
[01:32:15.740 --> 01:32:20.740]  And then when you go computer reading, you can't hide me safe from nobody.
[01:32:20.740 --> 01:32:25.740]  Well, mister, check in your mouth. Check in your daddy. Check in your grandpa and the granny.
[01:32:25.740 --> 01:32:30.740]  Check in on me. Check in on your baby. Check in on your family, whole family.
[01:32:30.740 --> 01:32:35.740]  Check in on your dog and the cat around me. Check in on the beef and you still go eat it.
[01:32:35.740 --> 01:32:40.740]  Check in on the fish, them all in the sea. Check in on the shark and the whale around me.
[01:32:40.740 --> 01:32:45.740]  You know, still mankind gone check crazy. They're the kind of thing man, they want to be be.
[01:32:45.740 --> 01:32:49.740]  Social security, they've got to tell me. Number when they give me, they repeat up the serum.
[01:32:49.740 --> 01:32:54.740]  Check in you in the morning. Check in you in the evening. Check in you all the dinner time.
[01:32:54.740 --> 01:33:01.740]  Experiment on mankind. But man, you know, say them lie. Well, we don't want no chip. Man, you have your body.
[01:33:01.740 --> 01:33:06.740]  Freedom or something. Man, you fight for it. You should tell them, they'll feel ready.
[01:33:06.740 --> 01:33:11.740]  Constitution set us free. Man, let them put no chip in your body.
[01:33:11.740 --> 01:33:16.740]  Put no chip in you dog or cat, you see. No, put no chip in on your cow and go eat it.
[01:33:16.740 --> 01:33:21.740]  No, put no chip in on the fish and go eat it. All in the whale and the shark in the sea.
[01:33:21.740 --> 01:33:25.740]  Put no chip in the little baby. Want to put the chip in a gun, boy, you see.
[01:33:25.740 --> 01:33:30.740]  Want to put the little chip in a high man's body. If me go hide in the Atlantic sea.
[01:33:30.740 --> 01:33:35.740]  Found it at the light, me say, gonna fly me. Satellite get mad, satellite get angry.
[01:33:35.740 --> 01:33:40.740]  Two chip them use, me say, crash up, you see. Me say, chip in on the morning. Chip in on the evening.
[01:33:40.740 --> 01:33:47.740]  Chip in on your body. Man, let them come come chip we. Put no chip in on the little baby.
[01:33:47.740 --> 01:33:51.740]  Chip in on the morning. Chip in on the evening. They want to come and not chip me.
[01:33:51.740 --> 01:33:56.740]  But they want to chip all in on the sea. And the shark and the whale around me.
[01:33:56.740 --> 01:34:01.740]  Want me say, chip for your mom, chip for your daddy. Chip for the damn little, little baby.
[01:34:01.740 --> 01:34:06.740]  Chip for the shark and the whale in the sea. Chip for the whale and the mull around me.
[01:34:06.740 --> 01:34:11.740]  Chip for the dog and the cat, you see. Even want to chip man the chicken around me.
[01:34:11.740 --> 01:34:22.740]  Okay, this is the rule of law. We're going to your calls. And we've got Pat in Texas.
[01:34:22.740 --> 01:34:29.740]  Pat, thanks for calling in. What's on your mind tonight? Pat, you there?
[01:34:29.740 --> 01:34:36.740]  Okay, Pat's up on the towers, Wendy. He probably can't hear us.
[01:34:36.740 --> 01:34:44.740]  Okay, we are going. Oh, wait, there he is. Pat, you there?
[01:34:44.740 --> 01:34:45.740]  Can you hear me?
[01:34:45.740 --> 01:34:46.740]  Yes, go ahead.
[01:34:46.740 --> 01:34:47.740]  Can you hear me?
[01:34:47.740 --> 01:34:50.740]  Yes, I can hear you. Go ahead, please.
[01:34:50.740 --> 01:34:51.740]  Can you hear me?
[01:34:51.740 --> 01:34:52.740]  Yes.
[01:34:52.740 --> 01:34:56.740]  I've got real bad reception. Yeah, I'm here.
[01:34:56.740 --> 01:34:58.740]  Okay, go ahead. What's on your mind?
[01:34:58.740 --> 01:35:10.740]  I heard Randy say earlier that the district attorney and I thought he also said the county attorney cannot practice law.
[01:35:10.740 --> 01:35:11.740]  Can you hear me?
[01:35:11.740 --> 01:35:14.740]  Yes, we can. Yes, we can. Go ahead.
[01:35:14.740 --> 01:35:15.740]  Hello.
[01:35:15.740 --> 01:35:19.740]  Yeah, the county attorney elected.
[01:35:19.740 --> 01:35:20.740]  Can you hear me?
[01:35:20.740 --> 01:35:26.740]  Yes, Pat's having trouble hearing us.
[01:35:26.740 --> 01:35:30.740]  Sorry, Robin.
[01:35:30.740 --> 01:35:31.740]  Did we lose him?
[01:35:31.740 --> 01:35:33.740]  Yeah, we lost him. Go ahead, Randy.
[01:35:33.740 --> 01:35:51.740]  Okay, yeah. The elected prosecuting attorney and district attorney and county attorney cannot practice law on the side while they're attorneys for the state, and that goes for their hired assistants as well.
[01:35:51.740 --> 01:36:00.740]  A municipal attorney can, but not a state's attorney.
[01:36:00.740 --> 01:36:03.740]  And that's all there is to that.
[01:36:03.740 --> 01:36:05.740]  Okay, since we lost Pat.
[01:36:05.740 --> 01:36:12.740]  Okay, let's continue. Yeah, we lost Pat. He's up on the tower way out in the boonies.
[01:36:12.740 --> 01:36:18.740]  We're going to go to Jim in Texas.
[01:36:18.740 --> 01:36:19.740]  Yeah, this is me.
[01:36:19.740 --> 01:36:21.740]  Go ahead, Jim. What's on your mind?
[01:36:21.740 --> 01:36:26.740]  Well, it's just I had a comment to make, and I visited with Randy, I mean, Eddie about this.
[01:36:26.740 --> 01:36:32.740]  The fellow before was talking about the both before magistrate.
[01:36:32.740 --> 01:36:41.740]  Tonight they arrested me, and they didn't really be reading my rights or anything, but they finally got me to the jail, and I told them I wanted to see a magistrate.
[01:36:41.740 --> 01:36:53.740]  They said, well, you can do that between 8 and 10 in the morning, and I said, no, the Supreme Court says I can see one immediately, and they said, well, why don't you call the Supreme Court then?
[01:36:53.740 --> 01:36:56.740]  Well, you need to get their names.
[01:36:56.740 --> 01:37:23.740]  Well, you know, I had a friend there, because it's 300 miles there, go down there and try to get it. I've got all this paperwork. I went down there personally to get this information, and they ran it back through the attorney general, and they would not give me that information. They said I had no right to it.
[01:37:23.740 --> 01:37:28.740]  Okay, that's going to depend on how you made the request.
[01:37:28.740 --> 01:37:30.740]  I put it in writing at the desk there.
[01:37:30.740 --> 01:37:32.740]  What did you ask for?
[01:37:32.740 --> 01:37:41.740]  I asked for all the names and all the information pertaining to my arrest that night, all the names and the badge numbers.
[01:37:41.740 --> 01:38:09.740]  Okay, this is one of the things about doing an information request. When I do information requests, I tend to ask for one piece of information in the request, because what they'll do is if you ask for several pieces and they can find one piece that they disagree with, then they hold up everything else based on the one they disagree with.
[01:38:09.740 --> 01:38:13.740]  And often, if they deny one, they just won't give you all the rest.
[01:38:13.740 --> 01:38:15.740]  Well, they wouldn't give me anything.
[01:38:15.740 --> 01:38:25.740]  Yes, so I request everything separately. And any time they give me a hard time, they get the scope and content request.
[01:38:25.740 --> 01:38:27.740]  Scope and content.
[01:38:27.740 --> 01:38:44.740]  Yeah, what I want to know is, so that I may be able to limit the scope of my request, tell me every record that you keep.
[01:38:44.740 --> 01:38:47.740]  Tell me what you call that record.
[01:38:47.740 --> 01:39:05.740]  Tell me the substantive scope and content of that record. Now, I'm not asking what to ask for any specific information that's in it. I just want to know generally what every record contains, what you call it, where you keep it, what format you keep it in, how I can request it.
[01:39:05.740 --> 01:39:10.740]  This is, it's a, I have it on my website is the scope and content.
[01:39:10.740 --> 01:39:11.740]  And I'll look it up.
[01:39:11.740 --> 01:39:25.740]  Now, this one's fun because you send that to them and they'll send you back a answer saying that the request is unclear, that they don't understand what I'm asking for.
[01:39:25.740 --> 01:39:32.740]  And I send them a response saying, if you don't understand what I'm asking for, talk to the legislature.
[01:39:32.740 --> 01:39:44.740]  This particular request is taken right out of 552 government code. If you don't understand what the law says, go ask the legislature what they meant.
[01:39:44.740 --> 01:39:56.740]  And they really hate this one. I had a captain on the sheriff's department spend six hours with me, going through every record they had.
[01:39:56.740 --> 01:40:06.740]  And when we were done, I gave him some very focused information requests. And once you've done the scope and content request with them, it gets their attention.
[01:40:06.740 --> 01:40:27.740]  Now, when I do open records, I'm hoping that they will violate it. I craft my requests in a way that I try to get them to wonder why I'm asking for this piece of information.
[01:40:27.740 --> 01:40:38.740]  And I'm laying in wait. Just go ahead and ask me why, Bubba, because when you ask me why I want this, that gets a 911 call.
[01:40:38.740 --> 01:40:45.740]  And you do that to them once, and then they realize you're laying in wait for them.
[01:40:45.740 --> 01:40:58.740]  If they make a request to the attorney general, when there are pre-existing determinations on that particular issue, I file a criminal complaint against them.
[01:40:58.740 --> 01:41:11.740]  Because the department is required to examine the existing opinions to determine if there is a pre-existing determination.
[01:41:11.740 --> 01:41:21.740]  And if they delay my access to the records based on a request wherein there is a pre-existing determination, they get a criminal complaint.
[01:41:21.740 --> 01:41:27.740]  It generally just takes one or two of those, and then you really get their attention.
[01:41:27.740 --> 01:41:29.740]  Okay. Does that make sense?
[01:41:29.740 --> 01:41:44.740]  Well, yeah, it makes a lack of knowledge of them. But I thought, you know, you go file it and put it in writing and ask for it. And it was a few weeks later I get this letter from the attorney general
[01:41:44.740 --> 01:41:59.740]  and that they had agreed with the department that, I don't know, I don't have it here handy right now. And then a few days or weeks or so after that I get one from the city basically saying the same thing.
[01:41:59.740 --> 01:42:20.740]  Okay. Rewrite your request. Ask for employment records for the time in which you were in the jail. You want to know all people who collected money from the state for labor in the jail during the time you were in there.
[01:42:20.740 --> 01:42:23.740]  Okay. That won't be hard to do because I don't know what night that was.
[01:42:23.740 --> 01:42:34.740]  Yeah, that goes to the money. And when you talk about the money, that's always open. Who got the money and what they got it for. That will give you the names.
[01:42:34.740 --> 01:42:47.740]  The thing they probably stopped you on was asking for information about the arrest itself, about the charges. That doesn't go to open records. That goes to discovery.
[01:42:47.740 --> 01:42:55.740]  And that's what they use to stop you with. So go back and look for administrative records you can ask them for.
[01:42:55.740 --> 01:42:56.740]  Okay.
[01:42:56.740 --> 01:43:01.740]  And I generally beat them up with the Open Records Act. I have a great time with it.
[01:43:01.740 --> 01:43:03.740]  All right.
[01:43:03.740 --> 01:43:24.740]  But try it that way and send them a tort letter. Send them a letter telling them that you were arrested and taken to jail as a matter of policy. You might want to write this down in the Monell sense, M-O-N-E-L-L.
[01:43:24.740 --> 01:43:26.740]  M-O-N-E-L-L?
[01:43:26.740 --> 01:43:30.740]  Yes. They will know exactly what that is.
[01:43:30.740 --> 01:43:32.740]  It's the Monell what now?
[01:43:32.740 --> 01:43:34.740]  The Monell sense.
[01:43:34.740 --> 01:43:35.740]  Sense?
[01:43:35.740 --> 01:43:40.740]  Yeah. Just in the sense of the Monell determination.
[01:43:40.740 --> 01:43:48.740]  Monell is the one that says if a city policy violates due process, the city is liable.
[01:43:48.740 --> 01:43:57.740]  Okay. We've got a number of callers. We're going to go to break. When we come back, we'll pick up on the other side and we need to move on.
[01:43:57.740 --> 01:44:07.740]  Thanks, Jim, for calling. We'll be right back.
[01:44:07.740 --> 01:44:19.740]  Aerial spring. Chemtrails. The modified atmosphere. Heavy metals and pesticides. Carcinogens and chemical fibers all falling from the sky.
[01:44:19.740 --> 01:44:32.740]  You have a choice to keep your body clean. Detoxify with micro plant powder from hempusa.org or call 908-691-2608.
[01:44:32.740 --> 01:44:40.740]  It's odorless and tasteless and used in any liquid or food. Protect your family now with micro plant powder.
[01:44:40.740 --> 01:44:49.740]  Cleaning out heavy metals, parasites and toxins. Water it now for daily intake and stock it now for long-term storage.
[01:44:49.740 --> 01:45:01.740]  Visit hempusa.org or call 908-691-2608 today.
[01:45:01.740 --> 01:45:23.740]  Hello. Oh, man. You're in jail. You got busted, man. Oh, man, I'm broke, dude.
[01:45:23.740 --> 01:45:36.740]  Some things in this world I will never understand. Some things I realize fully. Somebody's gonna police that policeman.
[01:45:36.740 --> 01:45:45.740]  Somebody's gonna police the police. There's always a room at the top of the hill.
[01:45:45.740 --> 01:45:53.740]  Things are great fine and it's lonely left too. They're wishing it with more than I position the bill.
[01:45:53.740 --> 01:46:00.740]  They know that if they don't do it, somebody will. Some things in this world I will never understand.
[01:46:00.740 --> 01:46:11.740]  All right. We're coming into the home stretch. We're taking your calls. We've got Dan from Texas. Thanks, Dan. What's on your mind tonight?
[01:46:11.740 --> 01:46:17.740]  Yeah. Hello, Deborah. Can you hear me? Yes, we can. Yeah, you can hear me okay. I'm on a cell phone.
[01:46:17.740 --> 01:46:22.740]  I was a little bit concerned, but I hear you all really well. Great. Go ahead. I was kind of curious.
[01:46:22.740 --> 01:46:28.740]  I've listened to your program a lot. I really enjoy it. I enjoy that program, but I don't get to listen to it all the time.
[01:46:28.740 --> 01:46:32.740]  And I wasn't sure what was going on with Randy and the City of Austin.
[01:46:32.740 --> 01:46:40.740]  Well, if you go to ruledlawradio.com, we have archives posted of every single show we've ever done.
[01:46:40.740 --> 01:46:49.740]  Yeah. On a personal note, this last week I got six dismissals on traffic tickets that have been kind of brewing and festering for about the last year or so.
[01:46:49.740 --> 01:46:54.740]  I had five of them in Williamson County and one in Gillespie County. They've all been dismissed.
[01:46:54.740 --> 01:47:00.740]  And Eddie had mentioned, you know, when he was talking about the City of Austin,
[01:47:00.740 --> 01:47:07.740]  he was talking about the state oath of office and the statement of elected appointed officer and the federal oath.
[01:47:07.740 --> 01:47:13.740]  And I'm guessing that he's referring to Title IV, Section 101 of the United States Code. Would that be correct?
[01:47:13.740 --> 01:47:18.740]  I'm not sure. I was thinking it was under Title V.
[01:47:18.740 --> 01:47:28.740]  Eddie has dropped off because he's got technical difficulties due to extreme weather circumstances up in East Texas right now.
[01:47:28.740 --> 01:47:36.740]  I've been trying to get him back on the line for like 10 minutes, and so he can't answer that question right now.
[01:47:36.740 --> 01:47:42.740]  Randy, if you ever get a chance to look into it, if you can get to a law library and look at the United States Code,
[01:47:42.740 --> 01:47:46.740]  okay, it's actually in Title IV, Section 101 and 102.
[01:47:46.740 --> 01:47:52.740]  101 gives the language of the oath, and 102 says it has to be filed along with their state oath of office.
[01:47:52.740 --> 01:47:58.740]  So if you're checking county officials, you go to the county clerk office. That's where it should be.
[01:47:58.740 --> 01:48:06.740]  For state officials, it should be at the secretary of state's office for, you know, the governor and the attorney general.
[01:48:06.740 --> 01:48:11.740]  And every one that I've ever checked does not have it, okay?
[01:48:11.740 --> 01:48:16.740]  And what the law actually says, the federal law, is that every member of a state legislature
[01:48:16.740 --> 01:48:23.740]  and every executive judicial officer shall take an oath in the following form to it, and then it recites the language of the oath.
[01:48:23.740 --> 01:48:28.740]  Okay, and they don't do it. The Texas legislature does not take this oath, and I've checked the House
[01:48:28.740 --> 01:48:36.740]  and the Senate journals going back quite some ways, and they have not taken it for as far back as I've ever checked, okay?
[01:48:36.740 --> 01:48:44.740]  Which technically means that all the state laws that they passed are in violation of federal law, if you want to put a real point to it.
[01:48:44.740 --> 01:48:49.740]  Now, if you're raising this issue in City of Austin Municipal Court,
[01:48:49.740 --> 01:48:53.740]  I can guarantee you that the city judges and the prosecutors do not have this oath.
[01:48:53.740 --> 01:48:57.740]  But the place to find it and check and see if they do is with the city records.
[01:48:57.740 --> 01:49:01.740]  They made a change a few years back, and they filed their oaths locally.
[01:49:01.740 --> 01:49:05.740]  They filed their Texas state oath and statement of elect and appointed officer.
[01:49:05.740 --> 01:49:11.740]  If they even have those, they'd be filed locally with the city. So that'd be where you'd want to check.
[01:49:11.740 --> 01:49:16.740]  So good. So the city municipal clerk or the city secretary?
[01:49:16.740 --> 01:49:19.740]  They should have them. Thank you. That's awesome.
[01:49:19.740 --> 01:49:24.740]  Now, there was one thing I was going to say. I don't want to, you know, talk more than my limit,
[01:49:24.740 --> 01:49:31.740]  but I actually was involved with some people, and we kind of ran this issue with the federal court on kind of a preliminary.
[01:49:31.740 --> 01:49:36.740]  We didn't go as far as we would have liked, and the actual case, it was just a small part of a case
[01:49:36.740 --> 01:49:39.740]  which was dismissed for supposedly immunity grounds.
[01:49:39.740 --> 01:49:44.740]  They claimed that all these different officials we were suing, which was not everybody in Williamson County, by the way,
[01:49:44.740 --> 01:49:49.740]  that they all had judicial and prosecutorial immunity and everything like that.
[01:49:49.740 --> 01:49:55.740]  But in our original complaint, we did raise this oath issue as an element of the complaint, and they didn't answer.
[01:49:55.740 --> 01:50:06.740]  So we did a motion for summary judgment in federal court, which forced them to give us the best answer they could come up with, okay?
[01:50:06.740 --> 01:50:08.740]  And so what did they answer?
[01:50:08.740 --> 01:50:12.740]  Well, we were fighting the Attorney General of Texas because we were suing state defendants.
[01:50:12.740 --> 01:50:17.740]  We were suing John Bradley, District Attorney of Williamson County, and a judge named Michael Jurgen.
[01:50:17.740 --> 01:50:22.740]  So the AG of Texas was defending them because he defended state defendants.
[01:50:22.740 --> 01:50:29.740]  And we were also suing Williamson County defendants, the sheriff, the county attorney, and several of the county judges.
[01:50:29.740 --> 01:50:34.740]  And they were defended by a county attorney whose job was to defend the county in civil litigation.
[01:50:34.740 --> 01:50:39.740]  And we were suing a private attorney, and he had his own private attorney that was defending him.
[01:50:39.740 --> 01:50:42.740]  And he got three different answers.
[01:50:42.740 --> 01:50:44.740]  The AG basically said he had no answer.
[01:50:44.740 --> 01:50:51.740]  His only answer was that he couldn't find any case law to address this issue
[01:50:51.740 --> 01:50:55.740]  and that the Texas oath of office was good enough for government work in a nutshell.
[01:50:55.740 --> 01:51:01.740]  He said that they take the potential oath, just like the president's supposed to, and that's actually better,
[01:51:01.740 --> 01:51:05.740]  and it's an earlier oath in this institution, and on and on and on, okay?
[01:51:05.740 --> 01:51:10.740]  The county attorney, who was a gentleman that I really, really liked, and unfortunately he's passed away.
[01:51:10.740 --> 01:51:11.740]  I really liked him a lot.
[01:51:11.740 --> 01:51:13.740]  I just found that out.
[01:51:13.740 --> 01:51:16.740]  But he actually reached in and got some territorial law.
[01:51:16.740 --> 01:51:21.740]  He got some Indian law from, like, the 1890s, and he got something from Panama Canal.
[01:51:21.740 --> 01:51:24.740]  And so I got to make a response to that, and I pointed out that it was off point,
[01:51:24.740 --> 01:51:27.740]  that we were talking about requirements of state.
[01:51:27.740 --> 01:51:32.740]  He did find federal law, but it was territorial and Panama Canal law.
[01:51:32.740 --> 01:51:37.740]  And then the private came up with a case, a Texas case,
[01:51:37.740 --> 01:51:41.740]  which is probably what will be thrown at you if they respond.
[01:51:41.740 --> 01:51:45.740]  And it was in 1945, it's called Van Hodge v. State,
[01:51:45.740 --> 01:51:53.740]  where a Houston attorney actually raised this issue in kind of a round of play in a death penalty case, okay?
[01:51:53.740 --> 01:51:59.740]  But what happened was he appealed to the Court of Criminal Appeals and raised it for the first time on appeal.
[01:51:59.740 --> 01:52:06.740]  And what they ruled in their initial ruling was that he waived his right to raise that issue because he did not raise it at trial.
[01:52:06.740 --> 01:52:09.740]  And you can't raise it on appeal as a first attempt.
[01:52:09.740 --> 01:52:14.740]  So he came back, this lawyer, he actually asked the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas to disqualify themselves
[01:52:14.740 --> 01:52:16.740]  because they didn't have the oath either.
[01:52:16.740 --> 01:52:19.740]  And that's when they came out with their second opinion,
[01:52:19.740 --> 01:52:22.740]  where they said that their oath is close enough for government work
[01:52:22.740 --> 01:52:28.740]  and that if they ruled in his favor, that basically Texas wouldn't exist in a nutshell.
[01:52:28.740 --> 01:52:32.740]  Because the attorney had asked them to call on the governor to appoint a whole new panel of judges,
[01:52:32.740 --> 01:52:37.740]  and they said basically the governor doesn't have it either, so there's no appointment power left.
[01:52:37.740 --> 01:52:41.740]  So the man's death penalty was affirmed twice by the Court of Criminal Appeals,
[01:52:41.740 --> 01:52:48.740]  and the lawyer came back and filed a motion for rehearing, which was denied without even a written opinion.
[01:52:48.740 --> 01:52:52.740]  So his client should have died because back then they didn't mess around.
[01:52:52.740 --> 01:52:55.740]  About a month or two after he went through that little bit of appeals process,
[01:52:55.740 --> 01:52:58.740]  you were a dead man if you got a death sentence in Texas.
[01:52:58.740 --> 01:53:03.740]  But I found out later that his sentence was commuted to life in prison,
[01:53:03.740 --> 01:53:08.740]  and there's the makings of a very interesting story there that I haven't gotten to the bottom yet.
[01:53:08.740 --> 01:53:13.740]  But I think his sentence was commuted because this lawyer threatened to go federal with this issue,
[01:53:13.740 --> 01:53:15.740]  and Texas did not want that to happen.
[01:53:15.740 --> 01:53:18.740]  So what they did was they jury-rigged case law.
[01:53:18.740 --> 01:53:22.740]  Anybody that raises it in Texas will have this Van Hodge decision thrown at them,
[01:53:22.740 --> 01:53:28.740]  saying the Texas courts have ruled, the highest criminal court has ruled that our Texas oath is good enough.
[01:53:28.740 --> 01:53:36.740]  So we need to bring this issue in the federal court, and then we don't care what Texas ruled.
[01:53:36.740 --> 01:53:40.740]  I'll tell you, Randy, I would love, personally, we've met once or twice,
[01:53:40.740 --> 01:53:45.740]  and I know you're local and often, but I've got a wealth of information on this very issue
[01:53:45.740 --> 01:53:47.740]  that I would like to bring to you sometime.
[01:53:47.740 --> 01:53:48.740]  That's great, Dan.
[01:53:48.740 --> 01:53:50.740]  We would love to hear that.
[01:53:50.740 --> 01:53:52.740]  And I think it's an explosive issue.
[01:53:52.740 --> 01:53:54.740]  I mean, I think it's just incredible.
[01:53:54.740 --> 01:53:57.740]  It's unbelievable, the ramifications of this particular issue.
[01:53:57.740 --> 01:54:00.740]  Dan, can you send us some links and some documents?
[01:54:00.740 --> 01:54:01.740]  Yeah, I did.
[01:54:01.740 --> 01:54:05.740]  I sent an email to Randy with the, as a matter of fact, let me end on this,
[01:54:05.740 --> 01:54:08.740]  because I know you've all got a program to get on with.
[01:54:08.740 --> 01:54:12.740]  But particular law, this oath that is found in the United States Code today,
[01:54:12.740 --> 01:54:17.740]  was actually extracted from the very first federal law passed.
[01:54:17.740 --> 01:54:21.740]  So Congress came into session for the very first time, and the Constitution was ratified.
[01:54:21.740 --> 01:54:27.740]  It is the first federal law, and it was originally found at 1 Stat. 23,
[01:54:27.740 --> 01:54:30.740]  first statute book of the United States, page 23.
[01:54:30.740 --> 01:54:36.740]  And it was put into the United States Code in the 1920s when they started with the Code,
[01:54:36.740 --> 01:54:42.740]  and they would give a footnote to that 1 Stat. 23 reference is where they drew it out.
[01:54:42.740 --> 01:54:46.740]  But in 1947, if you look at later versions of the United States Code,
[01:54:46.740 --> 01:54:50.740]  you'll see that the statutory reference is no longer 1 Stat. 23.
[01:54:50.740 --> 01:54:57.740]  What it is is it's 61 Stat. Chapter 389, okay, in 1907.
[01:54:57.740 --> 01:55:02.740]  And the reason that the statutory reference changed was because in 1947,
[01:55:02.740 --> 01:55:07.740]  Title IV of the United States Code was included into positive law.
[01:55:07.740 --> 01:55:12.740]  And you have to go to the Office of Law Revision Council website to read up on what that means.
[01:55:12.740 --> 01:55:13.740]  Okay, that's great.
[01:55:13.740 --> 01:55:18.740]  And listen, we've got to let you go because we've only got about two and a half minutes left,
[01:55:18.740 --> 01:55:22.740]  and I wanted to get to Gary here quickly before the end of the show.
[01:55:22.740 --> 01:55:23.740]  Thanks for calling in, Gary.
[01:55:23.740 --> 01:55:25.740]  What's on your mind?
[01:55:25.740 --> 01:55:28.740]  Gary from Georgia, is that correct, Deborah?
[01:55:28.740 --> 01:55:29.740]  Yes, go ahead, Gary.
[01:55:29.740 --> 01:55:30.740]  Okay, thank you.
[01:55:30.740 --> 01:55:32.740]  I'll be very precise.
[01:55:32.740 --> 01:55:33.740]  I know what I want to say.
[01:55:33.740 --> 01:55:36.740]  Sorry, Andy's gone, but thank you.
[01:55:36.740 --> 01:55:44.740]  And especially, well, I'll free of you, but for bringing up the Administrative Procedures Act and also the ordinances.
[01:55:44.740 --> 01:55:51.740]  When we grow up, as Randy and many people think, or the military, they talk about ammunition.
[01:55:51.740 --> 01:55:53.740]  Anyway, what is the ordinance?
[01:55:53.740 --> 01:56:00.740]  And here we're having a bad time where they put people in jail for not cutting the grass and so forth.
[01:56:00.740 --> 01:56:03.740]  But then how did it become a crime?
[01:56:03.740 --> 01:56:06.740]  And you do not have a jury trial.
[01:56:06.740 --> 01:56:19.740]  So my position on that is that an ordinance pertains to only the county officials and people in commerce
[01:56:19.740 --> 01:56:25.740]  because the municipal corporation itself is operating in commerce.
[01:56:25.740 --> 01:56:33.740]  Anyone can go on to sites of Manta, manta, manta.com, or Dun & Bradstreet. We all know that.
[01:56:33.740 --> 01:56:43.740]  So violations of ordinance, the court cases I have here, they have every quarter's court within county.
[01:56:43.740 --> 01:56:54.740]  And it says that does not, the plain language of the Constitution does not include crimes.
[01:56:54.740 --> 01:56:57.740]  So therefore, ordinance is not really a crime.
[01:56:57.740 --> 01:57:00.740]  They don't give you the nature of the cause of action.
[01:57:00.740 --> 01:57:01.740]  I know you've got to go.
[01:57:01.740 --> 01:57:04.740]  So I'll call back another night.
[01:57:04.740 --> 01:57:06.740]  I have a lot of good information on that.
[01:57:06.740 --> 01:57:16.740]  And also a court case in Texas where the Municipal Court of Texas is carrying on a legal enterprise known as RICO.
[01:57:16.740 --> 01:57:20.740]  So God bless everybody and have a nice night.
[01:57:20.740 --> 01:57:22.740]  Thank you.
[01:57:22.740 --> 01:57:25.740]  Yes, and I like the RICO.
[01:57:25.740 --> 01:57:33.740]  I'm going to take them on without RICO, but I'm going to do the private attorney general and claim that, you know,
[01:57:33.740 --> 01:57:42.740]  ensue for myself and all others similarly situated and petition for injunctive relief
[01:57:42.740 --> 01:57:51.740]  and demand that the city return all of the monies they've collected in furtherance of this ongoing criminal conspiracy.
[01:57:51.740 --> 01:57:54.740]  So that should get really interesting.
[01:57:54.740 --> 01:57:55.740]  Very well.
[01:57:55.740 --> 01:57:56.740]  Very well.
[01:57:56.740 --> 01:57:58.740]  And also go to AmJury.
[01:57:58.740 --> 01:58:03.740]  It's loaded with private attorney general sites, sir, or I can send it to you from AmJury.
[01:58:03.740 --> 01:58:04.740]  Oh, send me some.
[01:58:04.740 --> 01:58:08.740]  I have a big file for you.
[01:58:08.740 --> 01:58:09.740]  All right.
[01:58:09.740 --> 01:58:14.740]  So you have these all annotated because I can get it online from Alexis.
[01:58:14.740 --> 01:58:15.740]  Wonderful.
[01:58:15.740 --> 01:58:16.740]  God bless you, sir.
[01:58:16.740 --> 01:58:17.740]  Have a nice night.
[01:58:17.740 --> 01:58:20.740]  Thank you.
[01:58:20.740 --> 01:58:22.740]  Okay, Deb, do you want to take us out?
[01:58:22.740 --> 01:58:23.740]  All right.
[01:58:23.740 --> 01:58:25.740]  We will be back on Thursday.
[01:58:25.740 --> 01:58:27.740]  I'm sorry to the rest of the callers.
[01:58:27.740 --> 01:58:29.740]  We didn't get to you.
[01:58:29.740 --> 01:58:32.740]  We will take your calls on Thursday.
[01:58:32.740 --> 01:58:34.740]  This is the rule of law.
[01:58:34.740 --> 01:58:50.740]  Brandi Kelton, Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens.
[01:59:04.740 --> 01:59:31.740]  Thank you very much.
[01:59:31.740 --> 01:59:58.740]  Thank you.