[00:00.000 --> 00:04.600]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[00:04.600 --> 00:09.200]  UK police have been entering private homes through open windows or unlocked doors as
[00:09.200 --> 00:12.960]  a warning to residents about a lack of security.
[00:12.960 --> 00:18.200]  Once inside, officers pick up any valuable items they see and leave them in a swag bag
[00:18.200 --> 00:19.920]  for the owner to find.
[00:19.920 --> 00:25.800]  They also leave a letter explaining how easy it was to break in.
[00:25.800 --> 00:30.880]  Kansas Attorney General Steve Six says his office will not join other state attorneys
[00:30.880 --> 00:36.120]  general in suing the federal government on the allegation that the new health care law
[00:36.120 --> 00:38.840]  is unconstitutional.
[00:38.840 --> 00:43.720]  The US Department of Health and Human Services wrote governors and state insurers Friday
[00:43.720 --> 00:48.220]  laying out requirements for high risk insurance pools for people who can't get affordable
[00:48.220 --> 00:51.320]  coverage because of a pre-existing condition.
[00:51.320 --> 00:55.680]  Health and Human Services will administer programs for those states that can't or
[00:55.680 --> 01:00.360]  won't comply by June 23rd.
[01:00.360 --> 01:04.400]  Protests are growing against Pope Benedict's planned trip to Britain where some lawyers
[01:04.400 --> 01:10.560]  question whether the Vatican's implicit statehood status should shield the Pope from prosecution
[01:10.560 --> 01:14.040]  over sex crimes by paedophile priests.
[01:14.040 --> 01:18.480]  More than 10,000 people have signed a petition against the Pope's four-day visit to England
[01:18.480 --> 01:24.080]  and Scotland in September which will cost UK taxpayers $22 million.
[01:24.080 --> 01:27.920]  Senior British lawyers are examining whether the Pope should have immunity as the head
[01:27.920 --> 01:33.120]  of state and whether he could be prosecuted under the principle of universal jurisdiction,
[01:33.120 --> 01:39.000]  a concept in international law that allows judges to issue warrants for nearly any visitor
[01:39.000 --> 01:42.680]  accused of grievous crimes no matter where they live.
[01:42.680 --> 01:48.000]  Geoffrey Robertson, a UN appeals judge who delivered key decisions on the illegality
[01:48.000 --> 01:53.680]  of conscripting child soldiers wrote in the UK Guardian Saturday, quote, the Vatican is
[01:53.680 --> 02:01.800]  not a state, it was a construct of Italian dictator Benito Mussolini.
[02:01.800 --> 02:08.320]  Last year General Electric, the IRS's biggest client, generated $10.3 billion in pre-tax
[02:08.320 --> 02:11.040]  income but ended up owing no taxes.
[02:11.040 --> 02:15.040]  In fact, it collected a tax benefit of $1.1 billion.
[02:15.040 --> 02:17.460]  How does GE do it?
[02:17.460 --> 02:20.240]  By splitting itself into GE and GE Capital.
[02:20.240 --> 02:28.000]  In 2009 GE Capital lost $6.5 billion in the US and made $4.3 billion overseas.
[02:28.000 --> 02:34.800]  Not only do the US losses offset overseas gains but GE can defer taxes on that overseas
[02:34.800 --> 02:35.800]  income indefinitely.
[02:35.800 --> 02:41.400]  The tax benefit of overseas operations is the biggest reason why multinationals end
[02:41.400 --> 02:44.560]  up with lower tax rates than the rest of us.
[02:44.560 --> 02:49.800]  Forbes.com says corporations are getting smarter, not just about doing more business in low
[02:49.800 --> 02:54.480]  tax countries but in moving their more valuable assets there as well.
[02:54.480 --> 03:12.280]  You are listening to the Rule Law Radio Network at RuleLawRadio.com, live free speech talk
[03:12.280 --> 03:32.080]  on the radio at its best.
[03:32.080 --> 03:58.400]  Thank you all for listening.
[03:58.400 --> 04:05.400]  You go to school and learn the golden rule So why are you acting like a bloody fool?
[04:05.400 --> 04:07.400]  It's because you get high and you must get cool
[04:07.400 --> 04:18.400]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do? Oh, what you gonna do when they come for you?
[04:18.400 --> 04:24.400]  You chuck it on that one, you chuck it on this one You chuck it on your mother and you chuck it on your father
[04:24.400 --> 04:29.400]  You chuck it on your brother and you chuck it on your sister You chuck it on that one and you chuck it on me
[04:29.400 --> 04:37.400]  Bad boys, bad boys, what you gonna do? Oh, what you gonna do when they come for you?
[04:37.400 --> 05:01.400]  This is Deborah Stevens. We're here with Randy Kelton, Eddie Craig, and tonight we were planning on having the Coopers on as guests. However, unfortunately, they had to cancel at the last minute. So, sorry folks, we're not going to have the Coopers on for y'all tonight.
[05:01.400 --> 05:23.400]  We're going to try to get them on again as soon as possible, as soon as they are well able. But in the meantime, we have Eddie. It's Monday night, traffic night. We've got Randy, we've got myself. So, Eddie is going to proceed as planned, as normal, with some information on traffic and other things. So, go ahead, Eddie. Thanks.
[05:23.400 --> 05:46.400]  All right. Well, I got to say, I'm honestly a little disappointed. I was really looking forward to getting a chance to talk to the Coopers tonight. I really like this guy's style and what he's standing for right now. He is one of the converted folks. He was law enforcement. He saw the light and the ridiculousness of what was going on and decided to do something about it. So, he is to be praised for that.
[05:46.400 --> 06:07.400]  So, mainly what I want to go over tonight is I want to talk about something dealing with arrest in the cases of these misdemeanor cases and so on and so forth. I've been researching some case law for the last couple of weeks on this subject as well as some other dissertations on it.
[06:07.400 --> 06:26.400]  It comes to me that we have a problem with the legislature, one, not bothering to read the rules that are in place, two, not ensuring those rules are in compliance with the constitutional mandates the people have given them to work under, and three, general stupidity.
[06:26.400 --> 06:45.400]  Now, when you go through the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 14 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Chapter 14, tells what happens in an arrest without warrant, and you'll see at the very beginning of Chapter 14 that it specifically states that a police officer, law enforcement officer,
[06:45.400 --> 07:06.400]  or any person may arrest for a felony or a breach of the peace committed in their presence. Okay? Then you have Subsection B, which was added much later, and here's my problem with Subsection B.
[07:06.400 --> 07:22.400]  Subsection B is a slight variation of Subsection A, and basically this is all B says. A peace officer may arrest an offender without a warrant for any offense committed in his presence or within his view.
[07:22.400 --> 07:46.400]  Now, grant, understand this. This is the exact reading of A. A peace officer or any other person may, without a warrant, arrest an offender when the offense is committed in his presence or within his view, if the offense is, one, classed as a felony or as an offense against the public peace, commonly known as a breach of the peace.
[07:46.400 --> 08:05.400]  All right? Then they added B, which says forget that in A, an officer can arrest without a warrant for anything that he sees happen. So what do I have a problem about this for? Well, I'll tell you that now.
[08:05.400 --> 08:28.400]  It would seem that in the original understanding of what a breach of the peace was and what the requisites of an arrest without warrant were, that a misdemeanor charge must have a warrant issued before an arrest could occur,
[08:28.400 --> 08:44.400]  unless that misdemeanor was directly surrounded by the circumstances indicative of a breach of the peace. Now, as Randy puts it, and his understanding of it is that they have simply declared every violation a breach of the peace.
[08:44.400 --> 08:59.400]  Well, guess what? It's not. It only constitutes a breach of the peace if there is significant and imminent danger of physical violence or altercation.
[08:59.400 --> 09:08.400]  It can't simply be that the legislature just declared everything a breach of the peace. It doesn't happen that way.
[09:08.400 --> 09:21.400]  And here is something I want to read to you. At the common law, an officer had no authority to make an arrest for a misdemeanor, though committed in his presence, unless it involved a breach of the peace.
[09:21.400 --> 09:39.400]  The right of personal liberty is a very high prerogative right, and to deprive one of that right without due process of law, we must find specific authority for doing so. It cannot be left to inference for some strained construction of statute or ordinance.
[09:39.400 --> 10:02.400]  That's State v. Lutz, L-U-T-Z, 101 Southeast 434. Now, here's another one. The court said that before a summary arrest can be made for a breach of the peace, not only must overt acts be committed in the presence of the officer, but they must be violent and dangerous acts of some sort.
[10:02.400 --> 10:23.400]  Okay? Now, that's just a small inkling of what's to come in this, but the fact of the matter is that without a breach of the peace, arrest in a misdemeanor case has always been considered absolutely unlawful.
[10:23.400 --> 10:33.400]  Okay? Now they've got you where they can arrest you for anything under the sun they want to. They don't follow the rules in taking you before a magistrate.
[10:33.400 --> 10:46.400]  The courts cover their behinds by stating that, oh, well, he can wait three days and that's not an unreasonable delay if he's got a good excuse, and so on and so forth.
[10:46.400 --> 10:58.400]  To say that the courts and law enforcement are not in collusion to control the population through these statutory means is delusional at best.
[10:58.400 --> 11:17.400]  Okay? These statutory implementations the legislature creates, that's all they're about is control. They're not about public safety. They're not about justice. They're about control over you and I, and that's it.
[11:17.400 --> 11:34.400]  With that control, they can then determine that, hey, you didn't do something that we liked or you did something we didn't like. Therefore, we've got this statute that says we can now make you pay us money because we didn't like it.
[11:34.400 --> 11:51.400]  It doesn't matter that you didn't hurt anybody. It doesn't matter you made no attempt to hurt anybody. This is just a statute we wrote so that we can get you to pay us money anytime we decide to charge you with it.
[11:51.400 --> 11:58.400]  And we, good little individual sheeple that we are, have let them get away with it.
[11:58.400 --> 12:05.400]  That's got to stop. Okay? It's absolutely got to stop.
[12:05.400 --> 12:14.400]  And so one of the ways that we're going to have to do this is we're simply going to have to start going after these folks, tooth and nail.
[12:14.400 --> 12:27.400]  We're going to have to challenge the courts at every turn on their idiocy in interpreting constitutional provisions that require no interpretation.
[12:27.400 --> 12:35.400]  When it says you shall do something, Mr. Public Servant, that's the end of it. You shall do it.
[12:35.400 --> 12:45.400]  It's just like that billboard that they've got out there with God speaking that says, which part of thou shalt not did you not understand?
[12:45.400 --> 13:03.400]  Okay? The Constitution was written to tell these morons what they could and could not do. To let these same morons be responsible for interpreting what that means is ludicrous.
[13:03.400 --> 13:11.400]  We give them the power to determine whether or not they're in violation of the very rules we put in place to tell them no.
[13:11.400 --> 13:22.400]  And then we wonder how they get away with coming up with an interpretation that's in direct violation of the language and intent of the Constitution itself.
[13:22.400 --> 13:39.400]  Let's take, for example, Article 1, Section 10 of the Bill of Rights, where the legislature has saw fit to amend the Constitution to put it in direct conflict with its own provisions under Article 5, Section 12 and Article 5, Section 17.
[13:39.400 --> 13:52.400]  Okay? They have made it where now, in order to put you in jail, as long as that jail time is less than one year, they don't have to indict you.
[13:52.400 --> 14:01.400]  They don't have to do anything but charge you and send you up in front of a judge to find you guilty and send you up the river for a year.
[14:01.400 --> 14:10.400]  No more indictment. That was too much trouble. We weren't getting enough people in jail and extracting probation fines from them.
[14:10.400 --> 14:15.400]  So to facilitate our money-making ventures, we needed a way around that.
[14:15.400 --> 14:21.400]  Hey, legislature, convince the public it's okay to amend the Bill of Rights.
[14:21.400 --> 14:37.400]  Okay? Not any other provision of the Constitution, but the Bill of Rights. Tell the people it's in their best interest to throw away the requirement for an indictment before we can send them to jail.
[14:37.400 --> 14:45.400]  Anybody out there honestly think the people were that stupid?
[14:45.400 --> 14:56.400]  Now, considering that Article 5, Section 17 specifically states that a grand jury will check into all misdemeanor cases
[14:56.400 --> 15:08.400]  and hand down an indictment if they find probable cause to do so, is in direct conflict with this amendment to Article 1, Section 10.
[15:08.400 --> 15:18.400]  Okay? Direct conflict. It is also in direct conflict with Article 5, Section 12B.
[15:18.400 --> 15:22.400]  Now, I am currently working on both Section 17 and Section 12B.
[15:22.400 --> 15:34.400]  I am updating my Prosecutor to Show Authority motion to include those sections specifically because where the city attorney is attempting to act on behalf of the state,
[15:34.400 --> 15:41.400]  the city attorney is actually not allowed to sign an information.
[15:41.400 --> 15:49.400]  The law is very clear. In the instance of an information, according to Chapter 21 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
[15:49.400 --> 15:58.400]  that information can only be signed by a district attorney or a county attorney. It cannot be signed by a city attorney.
[15:58.400 --> 16:11.400]  Now, that's just on top of the constitutional provisions under Article 5, Section 21 that specifically says that only a county or district attorney can represent the state.
[16:11.400 --> 16:25.400]  Therefore, I am updating this motion to challenge the constitutionality of Chapter 45, Section 45.201 as being unconstitutional on its face
[16:25.400 --> 16:33.400]  for stating that all prosecutions in a municipal court will be done by the city attorney.
[16:33.400 --> 16:38.400]  I hear the music coming up, so we'll continue this on the other side of the break.
[16:38.400 --> 17:00.400]  Y'all hang on. This is Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, Randy Kelton, Rule of Law Radio, and we will be right back after these messages, folks, so please hang on.
[17:00.400 --> 17:09.400]  It is so enlightening to listen to 90.1 FM, but finding things on the Internet isn't so easy, and neither is finding like-minded people to share it with.
[17:09.400 --> 17:12.400]  Oh, well, I guess you haven't heard of Brave New Books, then.
[17:12.400 --> 17:13.400]  Brave New Books?
[17:13.400 --> 17:20.400]  Yes. Brave New Books has all the books and DVDs you're looking for by authors like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, Angie Edward Griffin.
[17:20.400 --> 17:24.400]  They even stock inner food, Berkey products, and Calvin Soaps.
[17:24.400 --> 17:26.400]  There's no way a place like that exists.
[17:26.400 --> 17:31.400]  Go check it out for yourself. It's downtown at 1904 Guadalupe Street, just south of UT.
[17:31.400 --> 17:35.400]  Oh, by UT, there's never anywhere to park down there.
[17:35.400 --> 17:43.400]  Actually, they now offer a free hour of parking for paying customers at the 500 MLK parking facility, just behind the bookstore.
[17:43.400 --> 17:46.400]  It does exist, but when are they open?
[17:46.400 --> 17:59.400]  Monday through Saturday, 11 AM to 9 PM, and 1 to 6 PM on Sundays, so give them a call at 512-480-2503, or check out their events page at bravenewbookstore.com.
[18:16.400 --> 18:18.400]  Don't know what they're hiding.
[18:18.400 --> 18:21.400]  Don't have the answer.
[18:21.400 --> 18:23.400]  Open up your body.
[18:23.400 --> 18:26.400]  We are expert Christians.
[18:26.400 --> 18:28.400]  Look what we're getting at.
[18:28.400 --> 18:31.400]  And they don't have the answer.
[18:31.400 --> 18:33.400]  So can't slip inside.
[18:33.400 --> 18:34.400]  Don't matter no issues.
[18:34.400 --> 18:36.400]  For see, Lord, how they want with them.
[18:36.400 --> 18:37.400]  Make it easy.
[18:37.400 --> 18:39.400]  They might talk way too politically.
[18:39.400 --> 18:42.400]  And them getting mad and angry.
[18:42.400 --> 18:47.400]  But they're not standing up and fight and fight for the freedom and the free.
[18:47.400 --> 18:51.400]  And they like them love slavery and get handouts from the government.
[18:51.400 --> 18:53.400]  Look what we're getting.
[18:53.400 --> 18:56.400]  We are expert Christians.
[18:56.400 --> 18:58.400]  Don't know what they're hiding.
[18:58.400 --> 19:01.400]  Don't have the answer.
[19:01.400 --> 19:03.400]  Open up your body.
[19:03.400 --> 19:06.400]  We are expert Christians.
[19:06.400 --> 19:08.400]  Look what we're getting.
[19:08.400 --> 19:11.400]  And they don't have the answer.
[19:11.400 --> 19:13.400]  So can't slip inside.
[19:13.400 --> 19:14.400]  Tyranny.
[19:14.400 --> 19:15.400]  They might tear you.
[19:15.400 --> 19:16.400]  They might tear me.
[19:16.400 --> 19:18.400]  Lord, they might tear the country.
[19:18.400 --> 19:19.400]  Tyranny.
[19:19.400 --> 19:20.400]  They might tear me.
[19:20.400 --> 19:21.400]  They might tear you.
[19:21.400 --> 19:23.400]  And they might tear the country.
[19:23.400 --> 19:25.400]  Them not tear up the coffee toast.
[19:25.400 --> 19:26.400]  And them rip it in three.
[19:26.400 --> 19:28.400]  Them give a damn about you.
[19:28.400 --> 19:30.400]  You not see how this country.
[19:30.400 --> 19:31.400]  How them lead we.
[19:31.400 --> 19:32.400]  Them not lead me.
[19:32.400 --> 19:33.400]  You see.
[19:33.400 --> 19:35.400]  Like we blind and we crazy.
[19:35.400 --> 19:37.400]  Them lead in with the destruction.
[19:37.400 --> 19:38.400]  You see.
[19:38.400 --> 19:40.400]  Nuclear weapon and big gun.
[19:40.400 --> 19:43.400]  From a point from the country of money.
[19:43.400 --> 19:44.400]  Tyranny.
[19:44.400 --> 19:45.400]  They might tear you.
[19:45.400 --> 19:46.400]  They might tear me.
[19:46.400 --> 19:48.400]  Lord, they might tear the country.
[19:48.400 --> 19:49.400]  Tyranny.
[19:49.400 --> 19:50.400]  They might tear you.
[19:50.400 --> 19:51.400]  They might tear me.
[19:51.400 --> 19:53.400]  Lord, they tear the country.
[19:53.400 --> 19:57.400]  We are expert Christians.
[19:57.400 --> 19:59.400]  Don't know what they're hiding.
[19:59.400 --> 20:00.400]  All right.
[20:00.400 --> 20:01.400]  We are back.
[20:01.400 --> 20:05.400]  This is Eddie Craig, Andy Kelton, Debra Stevens, Rule of Law Radio.
[20:05.400 --> 20:06.400]  It is Monday night.
[20:06.400 --> 20:08.400]  We are talking about traffic.
[20:08.400 --> 20:19.400]  Right now I am talking about the legislatively enhanced ability to arrest without warrant in the case of misdemeanor offenses.
[20:19.400 --> 20:34.400]  And what I'm covering is case law information that I've uncovered that specifically states that an arrest without warrant for misdemeanor is absolutely prohibited except in cases of breach of the peace.
[20:34.400 --> 20:41.400]  And then we're also covering just exactly what constitutes a breach of the peace according to this same case law.
[20:41.400 --> 20:53.400]  And so far every case that I have read on this specifically shows, here is a good example, Yerkes v. Smith, 122 NW 223, 224.
[20:53.400 --> 20:55.400]  This is from 1909.
[20:55.400 --> 20:56.400]  Okay.
[20:56.400 --> 21:07.400]  This exception in cases of breaches of the peace has only been allowed by reason of the immediate danger to the safety of the community against crimes of violence.
[21:07.400 --> 21:19.400]  Now, when it says this exception, it's talking about to the power of arrest without warrant, the exceptions are for felony criminal acts or breaches of the peace.
[21:19.400 --> 21:29.400]  Those are the only times that a police officer is allowed under common law venue of any kind to arrest without a warrant.
[21:29.400 --> 21:31.400]  Okay.
[21:31.400 --> 21:44.400]  Now, what I was saying about 1401A and B, since 1401A gives the officer all the authority he needs to arrest for a felony or a breach of the peace,
[21:44.400 --> 21:59.400]  why in 1967 did the legislatures appear to believe it was necessary to add subsection B, which basically all it did was repeat subsection A,
[21:59.400 --> 22:08.400]  except it removed the requirement of there being a felony or a breach of the peace and just said, oh, heck, a peace officer can arrest for anything that he sees happen.
[22:08.400 --> 22:09.400]  Okay.
[22:09.400 --> 22:12.400]  What's the problem here?
[22:12.400 --> 22:16.400]  Well, first off, the law of the land doesn't allow that.
[22:16.400 --> 22:21.400]  Therefore, the legislature cannot alter the law of the land.
[22:21.400 --> 22:24.400]  What is the law of the land, the common law of the land?
[22:24.400 --> 22:27.400]  It is the basis that the constitutions are written on.
[22:27.400 --> 22:30.400]  Constitutions weren't written on statutory law.
[22:30.400 --> 22:33.400]  They were written on top of the common law.
[22:33.400 --> 22:42.400]  The common law was as it was understood by English law before we inherited it and made it a part of our law in this country.
[22:42.400 --> 22:44.400]  Okay.
[22:44.400 --> 22:56.400]  English common law is what we based our law upon, and English common law was based upon that created by the Magna Carta.
[22:56.400 --> 22:58.400]  Okay.
[22:58.400 --> 23:04.400]  Which basically meant that the king was bound and responsible to the people.
[23:04.400 --> 23:07.400]  That's what each of us are in our own right.
[23:07.400 --> 23:10.400]  As sovereign individuals, we are kings.
[23:10.400 --> 23:21.400]  But we are bound to the duty not to interfere with the rights of any other king or queen, to be more or less correct about all this.
[23:21.400 --> 23:30.400]  But the simple fact of the matter is an arrest without warrant has always been considered unlawful except in the felony and breach of the peace cases.
[23:30.400 --> 23:31.400]  All right.
[23:31.400 --> 23:34.400]  Now, let's look at a couple more of these cases.
[23:34.400 --> 23:48.400]  In Murray's Lessie versus Hoboken Implement Company is what it looks like, 18 Howe, that's 59 U.S., 272 and 276 from 1855, folks.
[23:48.400 --> 23:57.400]  It is manifest it was not left to the legislature power to exact any process which might be devised.
[23:57.400 --> 24:05.400]  The due process article is a restraint on the legislative as well as the executive and judicial powers of government
[24:05.400 --> 24:15.400]  and cannot be so construed as to leave Congress free to make any process due process of law by its mere will.
[24:15.400 --> 24:16.400]  Okay.
[24:16.400 --> 24:27.400]  That means that Congress nor the state legislatures can make any process they desire their process and declare it due process of law.
[24:27.400 --> 24:28.400]  No.
[24:28.400 --> 24:36.400]  There are certain vested rights that people have under the common law that dictates what constitutes due process.
[24:36.400 --> 24:41.400]  The states nor the United States Congress may depart from that.
[24:41.400 --> 24:52.400]  To depart from that is to take a vested right and remove it and replace it now with their idea of a vested privilege.
[24:52.400 --> 24:55.400]  So they can't just alter it at will.
[24:55.400 --> 25:02.400]  This is Twining versus New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78, 100 from 1908.
[25:02.400 --> 25:18.400]  What is due process of law may be ascertained by an examination of those settled usages and modes of proceedings existing in the common and statute law of England before the immigration of our ancestors.
[25:18.400 --> 25:24.400]  Gee, you would think the courts could understand this.
[25:24.400 --> 25:30.400]  The expressions due process of law and law of the land have the same meaning.
[25:30.400 --> 25:43.400]  The law intended by the Constitution is the common law that had come down to us from our forefathers as it existed and was understood and administered when that instrument was framed and adopted.
[25:43.400 --> 25:51.400]  State versus Doherty, 60 Maine 504, 509 from 1872.
[25:51.400 --> 25:52.400]  Okay.
[25:52.400 --> 25:53.400]  Now get this.
[25:53.400 --> 26:02.400]  Texas allegedly became one of the states of the union by treaty in 1845.
[26:02.400 --> 26:13.400]  So this is almost 30 years after we've been a part of the United States, okay, that these cases are coming down the pike.
[26:13.400 --> 26:16.400]  So they can't say they didn't know about them.
[26:16.400 --> 26:21.400]  They have known about them for a long, long time, okay?
[26:21.400 --> 26:22.400]  Let's see.
[26:22.400 --> 26:31.400]  In interpreting what due process of law is, it has been held that none of our liberties may be taken away except in accordance with established principles.
[26:31.400 --> 26:41.400]  That's Eckern versus McGovern, 154 Wisconsin, 157, and 142 Northwest, 595, 620.
[26:41.400 --> 26:44.400]  That's a 1913 case.
[26:44.400 --> 26:56.400]  At common law as a general rule, an arrest could not be made without warrant for an offense less than a felony except for a breach of the peace, okay?
[26:56.400 --> 27:03.400]  That is State versus Simms, 16 SC 486, all right?
[27:03.400 --> 27:08.400]  Now the Supreme Court of South Carolina is who stated that.
[27:08.400 --> 27:12.400]  So let's look at a couple of other ones here.
[27:12.400 --> 27:20.400]  The Supreme Court in the case of Butoff versus Blust, 5 Lansing, Rep. 84, 86.
[27:20.400 --> 27:30.400]  At common law, an arrest could not be made of a person charged with a misdemeanor except on warrant of a magistrate unless it involved a breach of the peace,
[27:30.400 --> 27:36.400]  in which case the offender might be arrested by any person present at its commission.
[27:36.400 --> 27:39.400]  Well, that fits right into 1401A.
[27:39.400 --> 27:48.400]  Any person in Texas can arrest for a felony or a breach of the peace committed in their presence, peace officer or not.
[27:48.400 --> 27:53.400]  So what was the purpose of subsection B?
[27:53.400 --> 28:02.400]  The only thing you can get by reading that is that its entire purpose was to wipe out the limitations of arrest without warrant
[28:02.400 --> 28:13.400]  that was placed by the common law on police officers and on magistrates trying to direct a police officer to secure an arrest.
[28:13.400 --> 28:21.400]  Right now, this same article allows within view of magistrate, a peace officer in 1402,
[28:21.400 --> 28:28.400]  a peace officer may arrest without warrant when a felony or breach of the peace has been committed in the presence or within the view of a magistrate,
[28:28.400 --> 28:32.400]  and such magistrate verbally orders the arrest of the offender.
[28:32.400 --> 28:33.400]  Well, look at that.
[28:33.400 --> 28:42.400]  Even a magistrate cannot order an arrest except in a felony or a breach of the peace that they are witnessing.
[28:42.400 --> 28:50.400]  So how is it the legislature determined that, oh, well, we'll just make it where the cops can arrest for anything?
[28:50.400 --> 28:55.400]  Even the magistrates can't order them to arrest without it being a breach of the peace or a felony,
[28:55.400 --> 29:01.400]  so where do they get off saying that the cops can just do it because they feel like it?
[29:01.400 --> 29:04.400]  Because that's all this has done.
[29:04.400 --> 29:14.400]  This has given a police officer all the excuse he needs to arrest you for any dang thing he decides is an offense
[29:14.400 --> 29:22.400]  and to take you to jail despite the clear language of the law that says you are to be taken immediately before a magistrate.
[29:22.400 --> 29:33.400]  And I was talking to Randy about this. I've been studying the case law dealing with the 1517 and 1406 issues on arrest without warrant and with warrant.
[29:33.400 --> 29:37.400]  And I'll pick that up on the other side when we've got the break coming up now.
[29:37.400 --> 29:43.400]  But if you all stay tuned after this next segment, hopefully I'll get this covered and we can start taking telephone calls.
[29:43.400 --> 29:59.400]  So we'll see you on the other side of the break.
[29:59.400 --> 30:04.400]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[30:04.400 --> 30:08.400]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[30:08.400 --> 30:14.400]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors and now you can win two.
[30:14.400 --> 30:20.400]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[30:20.400 --> 30:24.400]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[30:24.400 --> 30:26.400]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[30:26.400 --> 30:28.400]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[30:28.400 --> 30:33.400]  How to turn your financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[30:33.400 --> 30:38.400]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[30:38.400 --> 30:40.400]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[30:40.400 --> 30:49.400]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[30:49.400 --> 31:03.400]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email michaelmears at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[31:03.400 --> 31:19.400]  Yeah, I got a warrant and I'm going to solve them to the head of government to prosecute them. Okay.
[31:19.400 --> 31:34.400]  This person's a risk for Mr. Bush. This person's a risk for the teen. Well, I need a prosecutor to come and help me prosecute them wicked leader.
[31:34.400 --> 31:42.400]  Yeah, you see, they're all liars. They're liars. I tell you stories. I don't believe what they tell me.
[31:42.400 --> 31:47.400]  Three percent of Americans vote for Bush. So how the hell did he get the presidency?
[31:47.400 --> 31:59.400]  Okay, we're back. I thought Eddie was going to do the intro.
[31:59.400 --> 32:04.400]  Sorry. I'm sitting here studying up for this next segment. I'm sorry. I'm bad.
[32:04.400 --> 32:12.400]  Okay. And we see a caller on the board here. So just hang on the line, caller. We'll get to you. Go ahead, Eddie.
[32:12.400 --> 32:19.400]  All right. Now, I'm going to cover these two here real quick. Now, before I read this, I want you to understand.
[32:19.400 --> 32:27.400]  These are cases, all the cases that reference this section I'm about to read, they come from, they are cross-referenced.
[32:27.400 --> 32:38.400]  These cases were cited in Alabama, Michigan, Arizona, Oregon, Texas, Montana, and Wyoming.
[32:38.400 --> 32:43.400]  They have all cited the case that says the following.
[32:43.400 --> 32:49.400]  It must not be forgotten that there can be no arrest without due process of law.
[32:49.400 --> 32:57.400]  An arrest without warrant has never been lawful, except in those cases where the public security requires it.
[32:57.400 --> 33:05.400]  And this has only been recognized in felony and in breaches of the peace committed in the presence of the officer.
[33:05.400 --> 33:15.400]  Okay? Now, we go to Tillman versus Beard in 121 Michigan, 475 and 80 Northwest 248.
[33:15.400 --> 33:21.400]  Officers are justified in arresting without warrant only in cases of felony and breaches of the peace.
[33:21.400 --> 33:26.400]  This is elementary. It is needless to cite authorities.
[33:26.400 --> 33:31.400]  Well, gee, must have been better elementary back then than it is today.
[33:31.400 --> 33:37.400]  Now, let's go a little further here. In 6 Corpus Juris Secundum,
[33:37.400 --> 33:43.400]  it has always been a general rule for the common law that ordinarily an arrest should not be made without warrant,
[33:43.400 --> 33:49.400]  and that subject to well-defined exception, an arrest without warrant is deemed unlawful.
[33:49.400 --> 34:00.400]  This foundation principle of the common law designed and intended to protect the people against the abuses of arbitrary arrest is of ancient origin.
[34:00.400 --> 34:10.400]  It derives from assurances of Magna Carta and harmonizes with the spirit of our constitutional precepts that the people should be secure in their persons.
[34:10.400 --> 34:19.400]  Nevertheless, to this general rule that no man should be taken into custody of the law without the sanction of a warrant of other judicial authority,
[34:19.400 --> 34:27.400]  the processes of the early English common law in deference to the requirements of public security worded out a number of exceptions.
[34:27.400 --> 34:35.400]  These exceptions related in the main to cases involving felonies and suspected felonies and to breaches of the peace.
[34:35.400 --> 34:45.400]  That's State v. Mobley, 240, NC 476, 83, SE 2nd, 100, and 102 from 1954.
[34:45.400 --> 34:53.400]  Now, that Corpus Juris Secundum references 6 CJS, arrest 5, page 579.
[34:53.400 --> 35:06.400]  Now, in England under the common law, sheriffs, justices of the peace, coroners, constables, and watchmen were entrusted with special powers as conservators of the peace
[35:06.400 --> 35:11.400]  with authority to arrest felons and persons reasonably suspected of being felons.
[35:11.400 --> 35:19.400]  Conservators of the peace also had the authority to make arrests without warrants in case of a misdemeanor which involved a breach of the peace
[35:19.400 --> 35:23.400]  committed in the presence of the officer making the arrest.
[35:23.400 --> 35:25.400]  Okay?
[35:25.400 --> 35:28.400]  And again, lots of case law sites on that.
[35:28.400 --> 35:33.400]  Oreck v. State, 105, South, 465, 469.
[35:33.400 --> 35:40.400]  Graham v. State, 143, Georgia, 440, 85, SE 328, and 330.
[35:40.400 --> 35:44.400]  Kennedy v. State, 139, Mississippi, 579.
[35:44.400 --> 35:53.400]  Wilson v. Town of Morrisville, 222, North Carolina, 293, and 22, Southwest, 2nd, 907, and 911.
[35:53.400 --> 36:02.400]  People v. McGurn, 341, Illinois, 632, 173, Northeast, 754, and 756.
[36:02.400 --> 36:07.400]  See, this is scattered all out the states, all throughout the states.
[36:07.400 --> 36:08.400]  Okay?
[36:08.400 --> 36:12.400]  Just like the right to travel issue is scattered all throughout the states.
[36:12.400 --> 36:16.400]  The case law that we have on this is from virtually every state in the Union.
[36:16.400 --> 36:19.400]  It has always been recognized as such.
[36:19.400 --> 36:28.400]  Now, another thing that I pointed out to Randy today is I've been researching the Texas Judicial Committee down there in Austin.
[36:28.400 --> 36:34.400]  These are the legislative members that are actual members of the Judicial Commission,
[36:34.400 --> 36:44.400]  the ones that formulate, create, and bring forward all the bills dealing with any judicial issue in the statutes.
[36:44.400 --> 36:49.400]  Now, one of those is from my area, Wayne Christian.
[36:49.400 --> 36:55.400]  Mr. Christian and I are going to be having a very heated face-to-face very soon
[36:55.400 --> 37:01.400]  over the changes they have made to the Code of Criminal Procedure, among others.
[37:01.400 --> 37:06.400]  Okay? Including Chapter 45 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,
[37:06.400 --> 37:12.400]  because I fully intend to challenge the constitutionality of 45.201,
[37:12.400 --> 37:17.400]  because it's in direct violation of the aforementioned constitutional provisions.
[37:17.400 --> 37:27.400]  Now, the chairman of the Judicial Committee in Austin is an attorney.
[37:27.400 --> 37:29.400]  Okay?
[37:29.400 --> 37:37.400]  He is the one that chairs everything about the bill that gets submitted before it goes up for vote.
[37:37.400 --> 37:43.400]  Does anybody see a conflict of interest here?
[37:43.400 --> 37:51.400]  Let's let the guys who are controlled by the rules write those rules.
[37:51.400 --> 37:57.400]  Let's get those that say what the Constitution limits and what they can do under those rules
[37:57.400 --> 38:04.400]  to be in charge of altering the constitutional amendments to allow them to violate those rules.
[38:04.400 --> 38:07.400]  What's the problem, people?
[38:07.400 --> 38:10.400]  Why do we allow them to do this?
[38:10.400 --> 38:17.400]  Why do we insist on remaining ignorant?
[38:17.400 --> 38:25.400]  We can't survive, not as individuals, not as communities, not as a state, not as a nation,
[38:25.400 --> 38:31.400]  from remaining apathetic and ignorant to the things that are being put in front of us by the people
[38:31.400 --> 38:40.400]  that we put up there to take care of things in a fashion that protects us and doesn't steal from us.
[38:40.400 --> 38:44.400]  Okay?
[38:44.400 --> 38:51.400]  It's just like when you take a child, you put them in your room full of fine china
[38:51.400 --> 38:57.400]  and tell them to knock themselves out, just don't touch or break anything.
[38:57.400 --> 39:02.400]  And what's that room going to look like when you come back?
[39:02.400 --> 39:09.400]  If you think for one minute that something in that room is not broken, not destroyed,
[39:09.400 --> 39:14.400]  or it isn't torn completely apart into an unrecognizable state,
[39:14.400 --> 39:22.400]  you are sadly mistaken or you have never had the experience of raising or babysitting a rambunctious child.
[39:22.400 --> 39:23.400]  Okay?
[39:23.400 --> 39:27.400]  I can tell you, when I was a kid, three, four years old,
[39:27.400 --> 39:33.400]  I was climbing the bookshelves attached to the walls, clean to the ceiling and jumping off on the furniture.
[39:33.400 --> 39:34.400]  Okay?
[39:34.400 --> 39:42.400]  And half the time I'd be bringing whatever was on the shelf with me.
[39:42.400 --> 39:46.400]  You're just, you have to treat these legislators
[39:46.400 --> 39:53.400]  and these public servants like they're petty children that don't know any better.
[39:53.400 --> 39:59.400]  If we don't control them, no one else is going to.
[39:59.400 --> 40:05.400]  We should be getting in their face every single time they do something like this
[40:05.400 --> 40:10.400]  and saying not only no, but hell no.
[40:10.400 --> 40:14.400]  Look at how quick everybody responded to the red light camera issues.
[40:14.400 --> 40:15.400]  All we got a problem.
[40:15.400 --> 40:17.400]  They're doing this, they're doing this, they're doing this.
[40:17.400 --> 40:19.400]  Yet they're still trying to put them in place.
[40:19.400 --> 40:21.400]  Why is that?
[40:21.400 --> 40:25.400]  Why is it we tell the public servant no, slap their hand,
[40:25.400 --> 40:32.400]  and the minute we turn our back, they go right back to doing the same thing just like that child would do?
[40:32.400 --> 40:37.400]  Because, Eddie, we should have knocked them clean out, cold-cocked them, not just slapped their hand.
[40:37.400 --> 40:38.400]  That's right.
[40:38.400 --> 40:42.400]  That child, after you smacked that hand once and the child ignored you,
[40:42.400 --> 40:44.400]  now it's time for a sore behind.
[40:44.400 --> 40:48.400]  Yeah, and also, Eddie, I don't treat them like they don't know any better,
[40:48.400 --> 40:50.400]  like they're doing these things because they don't know any better.
[40:50.400 --> 40:56.400]  I treat them like I know that they're doing it on purpose for nefarious reasons.
[40:56.400 --> 41:00.400]  Well, the thing about it is, Debra, when you read some of the stupid stuff they do,
[41:00.400 --> 41:07.400]  like what they did to 1401 by adding this subsection, it's clear they're stupid.
[41:07.400 --> 41:10.400]  It's clear they don't have a clue.
[41:10.400 --> 41:16.400]  I mean, they added verbiage to this that is essentially worthless
[41:16.400 --> 41:22.400]  as far as what it was allowing a police officer to do and do legally.
[41:22.400 --> 41:27.400]  Its sole purpose was to completely remove any responsibility on that officer
[41:27.400 --> 41:30.400]  for having to examine what he did before he did it.
[41:30.400 --> 41:32.400]  I think that they did that on purpose.
[41:32.400 --> 41:38.400]  Well, maybe, but out of the way, they're pretty stupid to think,
[41:38.400 --> 41:40.400]  I'm going to take it laying down.
[41:40.400 --> 41:44.400]  Yeah, it's a revenue scam because they get more money that way.
[41:44.400 --> 41:45.400]  That's true.
[41:45.400 --> 41:47.400]  It's all about the bucks, folks.
[41:47.400 --> 41:50.400]  They want your money, okay?
[41:50.400 --> 41:52.400]  They want my money.
[41:52.400 --> 41:57.400]  They're not happy with stealing it through the normal tax revenue channels.
[41:57.400 --> 42:04.400]  They want to come up with fines and fees that essentially are illegal taxes
[42:04.400 --> 42:14.400]  that we never authorized so that they can get revenue we never wanted them to have.
[42:14.400 --> 42:19.400]  It's like letting the child tell the parent exactly what their allowance is going to be
[42:19.400 --> 42:26.400]  when they want it paid and how often they want to raise.
[42:26.400 --> 42:33.400]  That's as ignorant as allowing Congress to vote their own pay raises these days.
[42:33.400 --> 42:38.400]  The Founding Fathers set up our rule of law with the belief that we,
[42:38.400 --> 42:45.400]  as a Christian nation, a moral nation, a sensible people,
[42:45.400 --> 42:49.400]  would forbid and prohibit government authority
[42:49.400 --> 42:57.400]  to be placed in the hands of unscrupulous men seeking the power of office.
[42:57.400 --> 43:03.400]  Instead, we have become a happy nation of get me my beer and my TV
[43:03.400 --> 43:06.400]  and leave me alone until bedtime.
[43:06.400 --> 43:09.400]  And we could care less what these people are doing.
[43:09.400 --> 43:14.400]  We could care less about who we're granting this authority and power to.
[43:14.400 --> 43:19.400]  And we could care less about what they do with it once they've got it in their hands.
[43:19.400 --> 43:25.400]  We have the perfect societal example in this moron in the Oval Office.
[43:25.400 --> 43:28.400]  He is a thief. He is a crook.
[43:28.400 --> 43:33.400]  He is an immoral, unconstitutional, un-American individual.
[43:33.400 --> 43:35.400]  I don't care how you slice him.
[43:35.400 --> 43:37.400]  Yeah, you tell him, Eddie. That's right.
[43:37.400 --> 43:39.400]  I'm just wondering why you're holding back.
[43:39.400 --> 43:41.400]  Why don't you say what's on your mind?
[43:41.400 --> 43:42.400]  I don't know.
[43:42.400 --> 43:44.400]  I don't want to quit being so restrained in the future.
[43:44.400 --> 43:46.400]  But again, we got a break coming up.
[43:46.400 --> 43:48.400]  I'll let that go for tonight,
[43:48.400 --> 43:50.400]  and we'll start picking up callers on the other side.
[43:50.400 --> 43:57.400]  So y'all hang in there.
[43:57.400 --> 44:00.400]  512-646-1984.
[44:00.400 --> 44:01.400]  Attention.
[44:01.400 --> 44:05.400]  An important product from hempusa.org, micro plant powder,
[44:05.400 --> 44:09.400]  will change your life by removing all types of positive toxins,
[44:09.400 --> 44:12.400]  body metals, parasites, bacteria, viruses, and fungus
[44:12.400 --> 44:16.400]  from the digestive tract and stomach wall so you can absorb nutrients.
[44:16.400 --> 44:19.400]  Micro plant powder is 89% silica
[44:19.400 --> 44:22.400]  and packed with a negative charge that attracts positive toxins
[44:22.400 --> 44:25.400]  from the blood, organs, spine, and brain.
[44:25.400 --> 44:28.400]  This product has the ability to rebuild cartilage and bone,
[44:28.400 --> 44:31.400]  which allows synovial fluid to return to the joints.
[44:31.400 --> 44:33.400]  Silica is a precursor to calcium,
[44:33.400 --> 44:37.400]  meaning the body turns silica into calcium and is great for the heart.
[44:37.400 --> 44:41.400]  There's no better time than now to have micro plant powder on your shelf
[44:41.400 --> 44:43.400]  or in your storage shelter.
[44:43.400 --> 44:46.400]  And with an unlimited shelf life, you can store it anywhere.
[44:46.400 --> 44:51.400]  Call 908-691-2608 or visit hempusa.org.
[44:51.400 --> 44:53.400]  It's a great way to change your life.
[44:53.400 --> 45:13.400]  So call 908-691-2608 or visit us at hempusa.org today.
[45:13.400 --> 45:24.400]  If you did not have any problem, where are you going to look for one? If you could not reach any battle, would your purpose necessarily die?
[45:24.400 --> 45:47.400]  Such a gentleman and a soldier, a warrior of love, scuffling and keeping peace. All they're taking is a misunderstanding, somebody calls the police.
[45:47.400 --> 46:00.400]  Why can't this fight stop? Why can't this fight stop?
[46:00.400 --> 46:05.400]  Break time isn't a fiction, hard work can leave you cold as nails.
[46:05.400 --> 46:11.400]  There's hostility, torture and cruelty, heavy loads of tape and unscathed.
[46:11.400 --> 46:17.400]  The time has gone on and with the counting, you find out after a while.
[46:17.400 --> 46:22.400]  It's not your moral standard, it's your patience that's on trial.
[46:22.400 --> 46:45.400]  Why can't this fight stop?
[46:52.400 --> 46:57.400]  Okay, we're back. We're going to your calls now.
[46:57.400 --> 47:06.400]  512-646-1984. We've got Dan on the line. Whoa, Dan.
[47:06.400 --> 47:08.400]  How are you doing, Dan?
[47:08.400 --> 47:13.400]  Yeah, Dan, that's not going to work. You're going to have to call back. It sounds like a hurricane on your end.
[47:13.400 --> 47:14.400]  Okay.
[47:14.400 --> 47:22.400]  Yeah, sorry about that. Okay, so callers, if you'd like to call in 512-646-1984.
[47:22.400 --> 47:29.400]  So, Randy, why don't you give some comments here on what the stuff that Eddie was talking about these last few segments.
[47:29.400 --> 47:37.400]  Well, I especially like the idea of being able to go after the prosecuting attorney on the constitutional issues,
[47:37.400 --> 47:44.400]  on his not being able to sign and information on the court not being able to pursue without information.
[47:44.400 --> 47:52.400]  I have some tickets and I intend to, when I go to court, take security with me.
[47:52.400 --> 48:01.400]  And first thing is ask for the bona fide aides of the judge and then the prosecutor.
[48:01.400 --> 48:09.400]  And when they can't come up with a license to practice law, I'm going to ask the city marshal to arrest the both of them.
[48:09.400 --> 48:12.400]  And, you know, they will move on from there.
[48:12.400 --> 48:24.400]  And then when we get to the issue of the city attorney attempting to represent the state, I'm going to ask the baby to arrest him again.
[48:24.400 --> 48:29.400]  Maybe we can get these issues in the court.
[48:29.400 --> 48:36.400]  Maybe, and I would most certainly like to get them on the floor of the legislature in front of these morons assembled
[48:36.400 --> 48:43.400]  because, I mean, it absolutely astounds me that they want to piecemeal changes into this,
[48:43.400 --> 48:51.400]  but they have not bothered to determine whether or not this piecemeal change results in a direct conflict with everything surrounding it.
[48:51.400 --> 49:01.400]  I mean, that's, if you've got the law so convoluted and corrupted that you can't go from point A to point B to point C to point D
[49:01.400 --> 49:09.400]  in a reasonable fashion and know that some other chapter with some other provision is not in conflict with any of these,
[49:09.400 --> 49:14.400]  then obviously you've got more on your plate than you ought to have.
[49:14.400 --> 49:17.400]  I think they know full well these are in conflict.
[49:17.400 --> 49:22.400]  They're just engineering. This is all issue-driven.
[49:22.400 --> 49:35.400]  Each one is trying to just create his own, you know, he's trying to serve his own interest, and they're not so concerned with the paramateria.
[49:35.400 --> 49:40.400]  Well, we're going to start making them concerned.
[49:40.400 --> 49:48.400]  And so here pretty soon, folks, I'm working on this. I'm almost done with it along with a few other motions for people that I've been working on
[49:48.400 --> 49:53.400]  just as hot and heavy as I could, but I've tried to integrate all of this as much as possible.
[49:53.400 --> 50:01.400]  This motion, prosecutor to show authority motion, will be an update here pretty quick to the seminar material for folks.
[50:01.400 --> 50:06.400]  So if you do wind up getting pulled over for anything, this is going to be one of the first ones you're going to want to file
[50:06.400 --> 50:12.400]  if they're going to try to hit you with a city attorney for the prosecution.
[50:12.400 --> 50:23.400]  Now, it's still a good read simply because it also deals with the issues of an information and an indictment being a prerequisite to any type of action.
[50:23.400 --> 50:36.400]  I am, in fact, trying to work up a completely separate motion that basically states it is prohibited for them to proceed without the indictment as there is no waiver of indictment.
[50:36.400 --> 50:47.400]  Because Article 5, Section 17 clearly states that in a misdemeanor case there must be a grand jury indictment, despite what Article 1, Section 10 says.
[50:47.400 --> 50:54.400]  That article, now this is something I wanted you to comment on, Randy, says they updated the Constitution
[50:54.400 --> 51:04.400]  and immediately put that updated section into conflict with pre-existing provisions of the Constitution.
[51:04.400 --> 51:10.400]  Does that not make the new addition void upon its face as it cannot be in conflict with itself?
[51:10.400 --> 51:20.400]  Well, that was going to be exactly my position. They're going to cite the Chapter 45, and I'm going to say like I did in the Federal Court when I asked,
[51:20.400 --> 51:28.400]  in Fort Lauderdale when I asked to videotape the courtroom, she said there's a rule prohibiting cameras in the courtroom.
[51:28.400 --> 51:37.400]  And I said, yes, Your Honor, I'm aware of that, but as I'm sure you know, that violates First Amendment to the Constitution, therefore you may not enforce it.
[51:37.400 --> 51:48.400]  If this statute violates a prior statute, then I maintain it is in paramateria. It was in paramateria with the law when it was passed.
[51:48.400 --> 51:54.400]  It's in violation of the Constitution, and you may not enforce it.
[51:54.400 --> 52:01.400]  Now, let me clarify something for you folks out there on Article 5, Section 17 of the Texas Constitution.
[52:01.400 --> 52:08.400]  There's been two amendments to this section, one in 1985 and one in 2001.
[52:08.400 --> 52:19.400]  At the very bottom of that section, there is a thing that says, temporary transition provision for Section 17, see Appendix Note 3.
[52:19.400 --> 52:30.400]  Now, I'm going to read Appendix Note 3 to you. Tell me if you notice what they did here and what the courts are continuously acting in violation of.
[52:30.400 --> 52:43.400]  3. House Joint Resolution No. 75, Section 9.01, 77th Legislature, Regular Session, 2001, Temporary Transition Provision.
[52:43.400 --> 52:54.400]  A. This section applies to the amendments to this Constitution proposed by House Joint Resolution No. 75, 77th Legislature, Regular Session, 2001.
[52:54.400 --> 53:09.400]  B. The reenactment of any provision of this Constitution for purposes of amendment does not revive a provision that may have been impliedly repealed by the adoption of a later amendment.
[53:09.400 --> 53:19.400]  Subsection C. The amendment of any provision of this Constitution does not affect vested rights.
[53:19.400 --> 53:32.400]  So, to the extent that the provision would have the effect of interfering with a vested right, the statute's unenforceable.
[53:32.400 --> 53:54.400]  Oh, not just the statute. According to this footnote right here, that amendment they made to Article 1, Section 10 cannot be in violation of a vested right. That vested right is Article 5, Section 17, requiring an indictment for a misdemeanor.
[53:54.400 --> 54:02.400]  Hmm. Well, the intellect thing.
[54:02.400 --> 54:27.400]  Given that, the amendment that they put in Article 1, Section 10 is in direct violation of a vested right under Article 5, Section 17. Therefore, the amendment is null and void as far as the language of states, except in the incarceration in a non-state penitentiary for a period of less than one year.
[54:27.400 --> 54:42.400]  Okay? That amendment is null and void on its face, because it violates a vested right under Article 5, Section 17.
[54:42.400 --> 54:49.400]  See, folks, this ain't rocket science. Common sense has its place, even if we're the only ones that have it.
[54:49.400 --> 54:54.400]  Okay, well the problem with common sense is it's so uncommon.
[54:54.400 --> 55:02.400]  Hmm. Well, hopefully that doesn't apply to our listeners.
[55:02.400 --> 55:06.400]  Oh, no, no, no. Present company accepted.
[55:06.400 --> 55:07.400]  Yes.
[55:07.400 --> 55:08.400]  Excluded.
[55:08.400 --> 55:32.400]  The point here being, okay, I don't honestly see, if we take this to the absolute extreme of how this is supposed to work, since the Texas Constitution, by the way they've got it set up, is actually nothing more than a corporate handbook for the state of Texas, not the Republic of Texas,
[55:32.400 --> 55:42.400]  but the state of Texas, that political corporation that isn't registered with the Secretary of State as required by law.
[55:42.400 --> 55:53.400]  Okay? Since it doesn't exist in Texas law as it's required to, how does it have any power to function?
[55:53.400 --> 56:06.400]  And since this is called the state of Texas Constitution, this is nothing more than a corporate policy handbook, which is why it's so damn easy to amend the thing.
[56:06.400 --> 56:13.400]  It's why they could say, oh, we only had 15 people vote this year. Well, out of that 15, how many of them voted on the amendment?
[56:13.400 --> 56:19.400]  Oh, we got eight. Good. That means we had a majority vote. Amend the Constitution.
[56:19.400 --> 56:24.400]  Those eight people changed it for the entire 12 million in the state.
[56:24.400 --> 56:28.400]  Uh-uh. Sorry. Doesn't work that way.
[56:28.400 --> 56:31.400]  Okay?
[56:31.400 --> 56:44.400]  Despite how they want to do things, when our government puts up a bill to vote on, okay, and they know there's a population of 12 million in the state that are eligible to vote,
[56:44.400 --> 56:53.400]  and they put it up and they set up the criteria that, okay, well, out of the 12 million, we only had an 8% voter turnout.
[56:53.400 --> 57:04.400]  And out of that 8%, we've got approximately 4.95% that voted against and the remainder voted for.
[57:04.400 --> 57:22.400]  So that really just means that 5.05% of Texans, or I'm sorry, anyway, the 4.95% of Texans just changed the Constitution for all of us, whether we voted or not.
[57:22.400 --> 57:26.400]  I got a problem with that.
[57:26.400 --> 57:36.400]  Basically, as our servants, the way I think this ought to work, and this is just my opinion, but I think it's a very valid opinion because of what it limits them to, okay?
[57:36.400 --> 57:41.400]  This would put such a severe constraint on how they could operate when it comes to doing this.
[57:41.400 --> 57:44.400]  It's not even funny.
[57:44.400 --> 57:51.400]  If the majority of the people that you know are eligible to vote within the state don't,
[57:51.400 --> 58:01.400]  then obviously they thought it wasn't worth even coming in and saying, no, we shouldn't have to come in and vote yes or no.
[58:01.400 --> 58:05.400]  This small group can't vote for me.
[58:05.400 --> 58:07.400]  No means no.
[58:07.400 --> 58:14.400]  I didn't even think it was worth my time to come in and tell you no because it was stupid for you to try.
[58:14.400 --> 58:18.400]  But anyway, we're about to go on break, so everybody please hang on.
[58:18.400 --> 58:20.400]  Debra, we got any callers?
[58:20.400 --> 58:26.400]  Norm from Texas and Dan from Texas, so we're going to go to Norm when we get back on the other side.
[58:26.400 --> 58:27.400]  All right, works for me.
[58:27.400 --> 58:28.400]  Y'all hang on, folks.
[58:28.400 --> 58:29.400]  We'll be right back.
[58:29.400 --> 58:52.400]  Okay.
[58:59.400 --> 59:24.400]  All right.
[59:24.400 --> 59:51.400]  All right.
[59:51.400 --> 01:00:04.400]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[01:00:04.400 --> 01:00:12.400]  German soldiers killed five Afghan troops Friday who were riding in two civilian cars that failed to stop at a checkpoint.
[01:00:12.400 --> 01:00:20.400]  It followed a clash Friday between German soldiers and Taliban fighters that killed three Germans and injured eight.
[01:00:20.400 --> 01:00:29.400]  Hejmatullah Atarzadeh, an Iranian diplomat abducted in Pakistan in 2008, says he believes the Israeli intelligence agency,
[01:00:29.400 --> 01:00:32.400]  Mossad, and the CIA were behind the abduction.
[01:00:32.400 --> 01:00:39.400]  Atarzadeh was rescued last week by Iranian intelligence forces in Pakistan.
[01:00:39.400 --> 01:00:46.400]  The American Civil Liberties Union says more than 800 complaints have been filed by families of civilians killed in U.S.
[01:00:46.400 --> 01:00:53.400]  military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. ACLU attorney Nazreen Abarji said the records, quote,
[01:00:53.400 --> 01:01:00.400]  illustrate that innocent civilian victims and their families are still not being appropriately compensated for their losses.
[01:01:00.400 --> 01:01:04.400]  This news brief brought to you by the International Newsnet.
[01:01:04.400 --> 01:01:15.400]  Angela Braley, CEO of health insurance giant Wellpoint, received a whopping 51 percent pay hike in 2009 to $13.1 million.
[01:01:15.400 --> 01:01:22.400]  The L.A. Times says at least three other Wellpoint executives got pay increases of up to 75 percent.
[01:01:22.400 --> 01:01:28.400]  During the health care debate, Wellpoint became the poster child for the abuses of the health insurance industry,
[01:01:28.400 --> 01:01:36.400]  pressuring lawmakers to support drastic reform and pushing Obama to add stronger cost control provisions to his health care blueprint.
[01:01:36.400 --> 01:01:39.400]  A Center for American Progress analysis found that, quote,
[01:01:39.400 --> 01:01:49.400]  double-digit hikes have been implemented or are pending in at least 11 other states where Wellpoint's Blue Cross Blue Shield companies are active.
[01:01:49.400 --> 01:01:56.400]  A Villanova University survey has found 85 percent of Roman Catholic diocese that responded
[01:01:56.400 --> 01:02:00.400]  had discovered embezzlement of church money in the last five years.
[01:02:00.400 --> 01:02:05.400]  Eleven percent reported that more than half a million dollars had been stolen.
[01:02:05.400 --> 01:02:12.400]  Specialists in church ethics say the Catholic Church has some of the most rigorous financial guidelines of any denomination,
[01:02:12.400 --> 01:02:16.400]  but the survey found guidelines were often ignored in parishes.
[01:02:16.400 --> 01:02:23.400]  Chuck Zeck and co-author Robert West, a professor of accounting at Villanova, did not set out to look for embezzlement.
[01:02:23.400 --> 01:02:28.400]  They were conducting a study of internal financial controls in Catholic diocese
[01:02:28.400 --> 01:02:35.400]  and sent a battery of questions to chief financial officers in the nation's 174 Catholic diocese.
[01:02:35.400 --> 01:02:42.400]  In October alone, three large cases of embezzlement surfaced, including one in Delray Beach, Florida,
[01:02:42.400 --> 01:03:06.400]  where two priests spent $8.6 million on trips to Las Vegas, dental work, property taxes, and other expenses over four decades.
[01:03:06.400 --> 01:03:25.400]  You are listening to the Rule of Law Radio Network at rulelawradio.com, live free speech talk radio at its best.
[01:03:25.400 --> 01:03:39.400]  It's all according to the will of the Almighty. I read his book and it says he cares not for the unsightly.
[01:03:39.400 --> 01:03:48.400]  These warmongers come by that term rightly.
[01:03:48.400 --> 01:03:59.400]  All right, we are back. Ain't going to pay for the war with our body.
[01:03:59.400 --> 01:04:04.400]  We ain't going to pay with our money anymore.
[01:04:04.400 --> 01:04:07.400]  They're wicked and their logic is shoddy.
[01:04:07.400 --> 01:04:14.400]  Words of the Three Shoes Posse, words of Jerry Stevens, Route 1.
[01:04:14.400 --> 01:04:21.400]  And we are going now to phone calls. Callers, if you'd like to call in, 512-646-1984.
[01:04:21.400 --> 01:04:25.400]  Norm in Texas. Norm, thanks for calling in. What's on your mind?
[01:04:25.400 --> 01:04:27.400]  Hello.
[01:04:27.400 --> 01:04:29.400]  Hello.
[01:04:29.400 --> 01:04:41.400]  Well, I'm heading to supposedly trial on Thursday in the lovely community of Red Oak for a citation.
[01:04:41.400 --> 01:04:51.400]  And it was pretty interesting how things have been set up.
[01:04:51.400 --> 01:04:59.400]  Unfortunately, I've gotten some of the information from you guys after our first little party,
[01:04:59.400 --> 01:05:06.400]  because when I went down there, first of all, I had to call.
[01:05:06.400 --> 01:05:13.400]  They don't even say, come in for an appointment. They just say, give us a call and we'll fax you something,
[01:05:13.400 --> 01:05:15.400]  sign it and fax it back.
[01:05:15.400 --> 01:05:22.400]  And so they invite you for the first party and then you get there and the judge is sitting at the table
[01:05:22.400 --> 01:05:27.400]  and he just says, guilty or not guilty?
[01:05:27.400 --> 01:05:33.400]  And that's how you're introduced to the whole procedure.
[01:05:33.400 --> 01:05:47.400]  So I did send a letter of inquiry to the prosecutor, who is a rented prosecutor, works for a law firm in downtown Dallas.
[01:05:47.400 --> 01:05:49.400]  Oh, goody.
[01:05:49.400 --> 01:05:56.400]  And have received no response, of course, and I had not received one at that time, even though a copy of it was in the file.
[01:05:56.400 --> 01:06:02.400]  Oh, by the way, I asked while I was waiting. Oh, that's another thing. There's no docket either.
[01:06:02.400 --> 01:06:08.400]  It was step right up and sign on in and we'll just go right down the line.
[01:06:08.400 --> 01:06:14.400]  Eddie, him working for a law firm and being a prosecutor, that's pretty much not allowed, right?
[01:06:14.400 --> 01:06:25.400]  Well, actually it is. He's a city attorney and as such is not an elected prosecutor.
[01:06:25.400 --> 01:06:34.400]  Oh, okay. Okay. But that's the entire gist of the motion to show authority that I've got is challenging his authority to act in that capacity.
[01:06:34.400 --> 01:06:38.400]  A city attorney cannot prosecute in the name of the state, period.
[01:06:38.400 --> 01:06:42.400]  Yeah, I was just responding to the question whether it could be both places.
[01:06:42.400 --> 01:06:52.400]  Yeah. Technically speaking, if you go by what the Constitution says, a city attorney cannot work for a law firm.
[01:06:52.400 --> 01:07:02.400]  Can't do it. He must, if he is going to fill the public capacity, he cannot hold another office or a private office outside of that.
[01:07:02.400 --> 01:07:11.400]  It's just like with the county and district attorneys, they're not allowed to practice law outside of what they do for the county or the district.
[01:07:11.400 --> 01:07:15.400]  They can't. If they do that, they relinquish their office.
[01:07:15.400 --> 01:07:17.400]  So that's a good argument.
[01:07:17.400 --> 01:07:18.400]  Okay.
[01:07:18.400 --> 01:07:27.400]  If he claims that he can step into the shoes of the state prosecutor, then he has to step out of the shoes of a private attorney.
[01:07:27.400 --> 01:07:30.400]  That's correct.
[01:07:30.400 --> 01:07:33.400]  That's another great argument. I'm going to like that one.
[01:07:33.400 --> 01:07:43.400]  And what particular statute would do that?
[01:07:43.400 --> 01:07:47.400]  You don't even want me to try to quote you that because there's only 20.
[01:07:47.400 --> 01:07:48.400]  Okay.
[01:07:48.400 --> 01:07:51.400]  That make it impossible for them to do so.
[01:07:51.400 --> 01:08:00.400]  That's the entire purpose of this brief that I have is to challenge the authority of the prosecuting attorney to do that.
[01:08:00.400 --> 01:08:02.400]  Okay.
[01:08:02.400 --> 01:08:05.400]  It is part of the traffic seminar material.
[01:08:05.400 --> 01:08:06.400]  Okay.
[01:08:06.400 --> 01:08:10.400]  So if you've purchased that, then all you need to do is just get this as an update to it.
[01:08:10.400 --> 01:08:20.400]  If you haven't, then I highly recommend you get it simply because it includes all the court documents and everything else you're going to need when it comes to fighting against these folks.
[01:08:20.400 --> 01:08:24.400]  Yeah, and it will bring you up to speed on the issues that we're talking about.
[01:08:24.400 --> 01:08:25.400]  Right.
[01:08:25.400 --> 01:08:34.400]  Well, as I mentioned, I sent the letter of inquiry to him and a copy of it was in the file.
[01:08:34.400 --> 01:08:43.400]  And before it was my turn to stand in queue there and get in front of the line, I asked both the bailiffs and the court clerk if I could see the file.
[01:08:43.400 --> 01:08:44.400]  And they said, are you an attorney?
[01:08:44.400 --> 01:08:45.400]  And I said, no.
[01:08:45.400 --> 01:08:49.400]  And they said, no, you can't see it.
[01:08:49.400 --> 01:08:53.400]  So they wouldn't allow me to look at the file before I got to the front of the queue.
[01:08:53.400 --> 01:08:57.400]  Well, they don't have a choice, especially if you have no representation.
[01:08:57.400 --> 01:09:14.400]  They have to allow you to see the file because you are allowed by law to see a copy of the complaint and the information no later than one day prior to trial so that you can say, I disagree with this, this, or this within those documents.
[01:09:14.400 --> 01:09:19.400]  And if they haven't given those to you before trial, then they're in the folder.
[01:09:19.400 --> 01:09:22.400]  And if they're in the folder, you have a right to look at it.
[01:09:22.400 --> 01:09:26.400]  Well, I was denied that by the clerk and the bailiff.
[01:09:26.400 --> 01:09:32.400]  Well, they complain to the judge when they do that because they don't have that authority.
[01:09:32.400 --> 01:09:33.400]  Okay.
[01:09:33.400 --> 01:09:36.400]  The law says you have the right to have it.
[01:09:36.400 --> 01:09:38.400]  Any cause for action there?
[01:09:38.400 --> 01:09:39.400]  Official oppression.
[01:09:39.400 --> 01:09:40.400]  Violation.
[01:09:40.400 --> 01:09:42.400]  Denial of a government document.
[01:09:42.400 --> 01:09:44.400]  That's tampering with a government document.
[01:09:44.400 --> 01:09:45.400]  All right.
[01:09:45.400 --> 01:09:46.400]  Wait a minute, wait a minute.
[01:09:46.400 --> 01:09:51.400]  You can't secrete a government document unless you aid it.
[01:09:51.400 --> 01:09:57.400]  Oh.
[01:09:57.400 --> 01:09:59.400]  And I don't tend to do that.
[01:09:59.400 --> 01:10:01.400]  I just want to use them for toilet paper.
[01:10:01.400 --> 01:10:02.400]  All right.
[01:10:02.400 --> 01:10:03.400]  Okay.
[01:10:03.400 --> 01:10:04.400]  Okay.
[01:10:04.400 --> 01:10:10.400]  This goes to 1.24 Government Code, I mean, Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:10:10.400 --> 01:10:12.400]  All courts.
[01:10:12.400 --> 01:10:16.400]  I got to the front of the line and the judge says, guilty or not guilty.
[01:10:16.400 --> 01:10:24.400]  And I said, I told him I reserved my right to enter a plea until I received a response from the prosecutor's letter of inquiry.
[01:10:24.400 --> 01:10:29.400]  And he wasn't real pleased with that and he opened up the folder and started flipping through it.
[01:10:29.400 --> 01:10:36.400]  And he took that letter of inquiry out and started looking through it and, you know, kind of rolled his eyes and said, okay, one of these knuckleheads.
[01:10:36.400 --> 01:10:39.400]  And so...
[01:10:39.400 --> 01:10:41.400]  He said that or that's just the impression he gave?
[01:10:41.400 --> 01:10:42.400]  No, no.
[01:10:42.400 --> 01:10:44.400]  That's just the expression on his face.
[01:10:44.400 --> 01:10:48.400]  And so he fires at me again, guilty or not guilty.
[01:10:48.400 --> 01:11:01.400]  And for the second time, and this was a driver's license citation, and I just repeated, I began to repeat, I reserved my right to enter a plea.
[01:11:01.400 --> 01:11:08.400]  And at that point he said, did you have a license or not?
[01:11:08.400 --> 01:11:09.400]  And I just...
[01:11:09.400 --> 01:11:11.400]  That's when you say objection.
[01:11:11.400 --> 01:11:20.400]  I just continued, I finished my statement once again reserving my right to enter a plea until a later time.
[01:11:20.400 --> 01:11:22.400]  And he said, okay, fine.
[01:11:22.400 --> 01:11:32.400]  I'm going to enter a plea for you, not guilty, sir, respond to A, be here on April the 8th, and there you go.
[01:11:32.400 --> 01:11:36.400]  And he filled out the paperwork, did not ask me to sign it.
[01:11:36.400 --> 01:11:42.400]  And he wrote the word refused on the signature line in two places, which I didn't refuse to sign it.
[01:11:42.400 --> 01:11:44.400]  He didn't ask me to tell me to.
[01:11:44.400 --> 01:11:47.400]  That's tampering with the government document.
[01:11:47.400 --> 01:11:51.400]  First thing you need to do is find out if the judge is actually a practicing attorney.
[01:11:51.400 --> 01:11:53.400]  Very first thing you need to do.
[01:11:53.400 --> 01:12:05.400]  And you need to go on my site and pull down the out of the blank section of jurisprudence and pull down a blank bona fides and send him a bona fides.
[01:12:05.400 --> 01:12:06.400]  Okay.
[01:12:06.400 --> 01:12:11.400]  And apparently he's been there a while because they actually have his name on the citation.
[01:12:11.400 --> 01:12:14.400]  And, of course, the citations aren't valid.
[01:12:14.400 --> 01:12:21.400]  Well, yeah, but, I mean, it doesn't matter if he's been there a while or not, does he have a private practice in that town if he's an actual attorney?
[01:12:21.400 --> 01:12:34.400]  If he's just somebody they appointed as the magistrate of the court and that's the lowly cesspool they've got to pick from and he was the best of the bunch, I mean, the biggest herd in the pile, so to speak.
[01:12:34.400 --> 01:12:45.400]  It's interesting because the citation has some interesting verbiage on it because you are here by and notified to appear before Judge Curse and there's nothing else in the box.
[01:12:45.400 --> 01:12:51.400]  And then underneath it, it says, this citation is delinquent 10 days from.
[01:12:51.400 --> 01:12:53.400]  I wonder what that means.
[01:12:53.400 --> 01:12:56.400]  I agree.
[01:12:56.400 --> 01:13:00.400]  But once again, there's no time and date to show up.
[01:13:00.400 --> 01:13:26.400]  And I also filed a notice of defect pertaining to the citation, notice of a violation by the officer for issuing the citation violation, the transportation code, and notice of prosecution.
[01:13:26.400 --> 01:13:35.400]  Okay. How well and how familiar are you with the Chapter 521 and 522 of the transportation code?
[01:13:35.400 --> 01:13:38.400]  Well, I can pull it up and read it.
[01:13:38.400 --> 01:13:43.400]  Well, you might want to do that considering those are the two chapters dealing with licensing, okay?
[01:13:43.400 --> 01:13:44.400]  Right. Oh, yeah.
[01:13:44.400 --> 01:13:45.400]  Yeah, I understand all that.
[01:13:45.400 --> 01:14:05.400]  Okay. Moving forward, along with those notices, I also made a motion challenging jurisdiction and I sent those things in last Thursday because the judge made it expressively clear that any motions had to be filed seven days before trial.
[01:14:05.400 --> 01:14:13.400]  So those are the only things I got in were those three notices and the motion to challenge jurisdiction.
[01:14:13.400 --> 01:14:17.400]  Okay. Motion to challenge jurisdiction is a different animal.
[01:14:17.400 --> 01:14:18.400]  Uh-huh.
[01:14:18.400 --> 01:14:20.400]  That can be filed at any time.
[01:14:20.400 --> 01:14:28.400]  Okay. Well, from his attitude and his conversation, I don't think he'd pay any attention to it whatsoever.
[01:14:28.400 --> 01:14:31.400]  Okay. Then ask the bailiff to arrest him.
[01:14:31.400 --> 01:14:33.400]  Uh-huh.
[01:14:33.400 --> 01:14:36.400]  Ask him for his license to practice law.
[01:14:36.400 --> 01:14:37.400]  Uh-huh.
[01:14:37.400 --> 01:14:41.400]  And when he says he don't have to have one, ask the bailiff to arrest him.
[01:14:41.400 --> 01:14:42.400]  Okay.
[01:14:42.400 --> 01:14:44.400]  And then move to disqualify.
[01:14:44.400 --> 01:14:45.400]  All right.
[01:14:45.400 --> 01:14:49.400]  That puts him on a very specific legal dime.
[01:14:49.400 --> 01:14:52.400]  Okay.
[01:14:52.400 --> 01:14:55.400]  But don't get in the court and don't get him to throw you in jail.
[01:14:55.400 --> 01:14:58.400]  Is disqualify different from recusal?
[01:14:58.400 --> 01:15:00.400]  You bet it is.
[01:15:00.400 --> 01:15:02.400]  A recusal he can deny.
[01:15:02.400 --> 01:15:03.400]  Okay.
[01:15:03.400 --> 01:15:05.400]  Disqualification he cannot.
[01:15:05.400 --> 01:15:09.400]  Okay.
[01:15:09.400 --> 01:15:14.400]  Yeah, recusal is when he's, you're asking him to voluntarily step down.
[01:15:14.400 --> 01:15:26.400]  A motion to disqualify is, whoever makes a ruling on that is done by somebody else in authority to kick him off the bench whether he likes it or not.
[01:15:26.400 --> 01:15:32.400]  What kind of rule did he break when he just pointed, Mike asked me, did you have a license or not?
[01:15:32.400 --> 01:15:33.400]  He's acting at the prosecution.
[01:15:33.400 --> 01:15:35.400]  He's no longer unbiased and impartial.
[01:15:35.400 --> 01:15:39.400]  Okay, this is a municipal or JP court.
[01:15:39.400 --> 01:15:42.400]  They can do that.
[01:15:42.400 --> 01:15:43.400]  Since when?
[01:15:43.400 --> 01:15:47.400]  The judge can question the accused.
[01:15:47.400 --> 01:15:50.400]  Sure he can, but he can't act as the prosecution.
[01:15:50.400 --> 01:15:51.400]  He wasn't.
[01:15:51.400 --> 01:15:52.400]  He was questioning.
[01:15:52.400 --> 01:15:56.400]  Before the trial?
[01:15:56.400 --> 01:15:59.400]  Well, okay, you only ask one question at a time.
[01:15:59.400 --> 01:16:00.400]  Don't.
[01:16:00.400 --> 01:16:06.400]  You tricked me asking me a question and then changed the parameter afterward.
[01:16:06.400 --> 01:16:08.400]  This was the first time I walked in the door.
[01:16:08.400 --> 01:16:12.400]  This is what should have been the magistrate of hearing, which obviously was not.
[01:16:12.400 --> 01:16:13.400]  Yeah, okay.
[01:16:13.400 --> 01:16:15.400]  He can ask questions.
[01:16:15.400 --> 01:16:16.400]  Right.
[01:16:16.400 --> 01:16:19.400]  But he can't do anything until he's established jurisdiction.
[01:16:19.400 --> 01:16:20.400]  Right.
[01:16:20.400 --> 01:16:24.400]  So if he hasn't established jurisdiction, then you ask to be able to arrest him.
[01:16:24.400 --> 01:16:28.400]  Obviously he presumes a jurisdiction, you know, unless I question.
[01:16:28.400 --> 01:16:30.400]  Right.
[01:16:30.400 --> 01:16:31.400]  That's true.
[01:16:31.400 --> 01:16:33.400]  But you questioned it.
[01:16:33.400 --> 01:16:35.400]  Or did you?
[01:16:35.400 --> 01:16:36.400]  No.
[01:16:36.400 --> 01:16:39.400]  I pretty much, all I did was basically.
[01:16:39.400 --> 01:16:40.400]  Okay, hold on.
[01:16:40.400 --> 01:16:41.400]  We're about to go to break.
[01:16:41.400 --> 01:16:46.400]  Yes, and also we've got a very, very full call board right now.
[01:16:46.400 --> 01:16:49.400]  I don't even know if we're going to be able to get to all the calls by the end of the show.
[01:16:49.400 --> 01:16:50.400]  Right.
[01:16:50.400 --> 01:16:51.400]  Okay, so.
[01:16:51.400 --> 01:16:53.400]  Call back in Thursday or Thursday.
[01:16:53.400 --> 01:16:54.400]  Friday would probably be better.
[01:16:54.400 --> 01:16:55.400]  All right.
[01:16:55.400 --> 01:16:56.400]  Thanks, Norm.
[01:16:56.400 --> 01:16:57.400]  Thursday.
[01:16:57.400 --> 01:16:59.400]  We'll see y'all after the break.
[01:17:27.400 --> 01:17:29.400]  We'll see you after the break.
[01:17:57.400 --> 01:17:58.400]  We'll see you after the break.
[01:18:27.400 --> 01:18:29.400]  We'll see you after the break.
[01:18:58.400 --> 01:19:05.400]  Ain't gonna drop me with that same old sucker punch
[01:19:05.400 --> 01:19:10.400]  I get it now but then I must have been out of touch
[01:19:10.400 --> 01:19:15.400]  Back then you had room to move but now you're feeling the grudge
[01:19:15.400 --> 01:19:40.400]  Ain't gonna get me with that same old sucker punch
[01:19:40.400 --> 01:19:45.400]  Ain't gonna please me with that same old damn song
[01:19:45.400 --> 01:19:46.400]  You thought you were right
[01:19:46.400 --> 01:19:47.400]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:47.400 --> 01:19:49.400]  We're taking our calls.
[01:19:49.400 --> 01:19:53.400]  And I believe Randy has disappeared.
[01:19:53.400 --> 01:19:55.400]  I'm not exactly sure.
[01:19:55.400 --> 01:19:58.400]  He's been kind of ill today so I'm not exactly sure what's going on.
[01:19:58.400 --> 01:20:03.400]  I think he may have abandoned the show and we're not sure.
[01:20:03.400 --> 01:20:04.400]  So.
[01:20:04.400 --> 01:20:09.400]  No, I was just practicing one of Carl's Castadena's techniques where he makes himself disappear.
[01:20:09.400 --> 01:20:13.400]  Okay, well I was calling out for you on the break because I needed to talk to you about something and you weren't there.
[01:20:13.400 --> 01:20:17.400]  And so me and Eddie were like, Randy, Randy, where are you?
[01:20:17.400 --> 01:20:21.400]  So anyway now I had to bring the listeners into it because we weren't sure what was going on.
[01:20:21.400 --> 01:20:22.400]  Let's just go back to the show.
[01:20:22.400 --> 01:20:24.400]  But apparently he's back.
[01:20:24.400 --> 01:20:26.400]  So we're going to your calls now.
[01:20:26.400 --> 01:20:28.400]  Well, Randy, we are on the air already.
[01:20:28.400 --> 01:20:31.400]  Okay, so we're going to your calls now.
[01:20:31.400 --> 01:20:33.400]  We've got Terry in Michigan.
[01:20:33.400 --> 01:20:35.400]  Terry, thanks for calling in.
[01:20:35.400 --> 01:20:36.400]  What's on your mind tonight?
[01:20:36.400 --> 01:20:38.400]  Hey, thanks for taking my call.
[01:20:38.400 --> 01:20:48.400]  I had talked with you guys at the traffic seminar about a problem I have been having with a neighbor.
[01:20:48.400 --> 01:20:53.400]  He filed a suit against me for a prescriptive easement.
[01:20:53.400 --> 01:20:58.400]  And we went into court and they argued and pleaded for a prescriptive easement.
[01:20:58.400 --> 01:21:02.400]  The judge ruled against the prescriptive easement.
[01:21:02.400 --> 01:21:09.400]  But after the trial was completed, the judge granted a reciprocal negative easement.
[01:21:09.400 --> 01:21:14.400]  It was never argued and never pleaded, yet he gave it to him.
[01:21:14.400 --> 01:21:19.400]  And I wanted to go back and challenge subject matter jurisdiction on that.
[01:21:19.400 --> 01:21:25.400]  And I'm not really sure how I'd go about doing that or if that's the right thing to do.
[01:21:25.400 --> 01:21:31.400]  Did you research the judge's authority to sue Sponte to issue that ruling?
[01:21:31.400 --> 01:21:32.400]  I'm sorry?
[01:21:32.400 --> 01:21:39.400]  Did you research the authority of the judge to issue that particular ruling suing Sponte?
[01:21:39.400 --> 01:21:41.400]  That means without a motion.
[01:21:41.400 --> 01:21:42.400]  No, I haven't.
[01:21:42.400 --> 01:21:45.400]  Okay, there are certain things judges can do suing Sponte.
[01:21:45.400 --> 01:21:52.400]  If the other side has an absolute right to it and it's certain case law has said they can do that,
[01:21:52.400 --> 01:21:53.400]  he may be able to.
[01:21:53.400 --> 01:21:57.400]  You need to know that before you go after him.
[01:21:57.400 --> 01:21:59.400]  Okay.
[01:21:59.400 --> 01:22:06.400]  Now, if I do go after him, should I file a judicial misconduct and bar grievances against him?
[01:22:06.400 --> 01:22:08.400]  Absolutely.
[01:22:08.400 --> 01:22:13.400]  Okay, because I heard the other night you had said something to somebody that was going through a child custody thing
[01:22:13.400 --> 01:22:20.400]  and you said be careful about judicial misconduct grievances because you pissed the judge off.
[01:22:20.400 --> 01:22:26.400]  Well, that's because now, you know, he's going to lose his kids.
[01:22:26.400 --> 01:22:34.400]  I mean, it's one thing to be right, but it's not necessarily a good idea to be right
[01:22:34.400 --> 01:22:38.400]  in spite of the rest of your life and your children's life.
[01:22:38.400 --> 01:22:39.400]  Okay.
[01:22:39.400 --> 01:22:43.400]  So, you know, you have to decide here, everything's a crap shoot with the courts.
[01:22:43.400 --> 01:22:50.400]  They're corrupt as they can be and you can have all the law on your side and they still rule against you.
[01:22:50.400 --> 01:22:52.400]  So, it's always a crap shoot.
[01:22:52.400 --> 01:23:00.400]  When you start hammering a judge, you need to really have a reason for what you're doing.
[01:23:00.400 --> 01:23:04.400]  If you're in a position to where the judge has discretion over you,
[01:23:04.400 --> 01:23:06.400]  I suggest don't kick him too hard in the teeth.
[01:23:06.400 --> 01:23:10.400]  He'll exercise his discretion however he wants to.
[01:23:10.400 --> 01:23:17.400]  You only hammer the judge when you've got him with no way out.
[01:23:17.400 --> 01:23:22.400]  And if he had no authority to do that, then you hammer him.
[01:23:22.400 --> 01:23:23.400]  Okay.
[01:23:23.400 --> 01:23:25.400]  And that was called authority to do what again?
[01:23:25.400 --> 01:23:33.400]  If he had no authority to issue the ruling without a motion, that's adjudicating from the bench.
[01:23:33.400 --> 01:23:37.400]  Okay.
[01:23:37.400 --> 01:23:38.400]  All right.
[01:23:38.400 --> 01:23:41.400]  I guess I'll do some more research and see what I can find out.
[01:23:41.400 --> 01:23:44.400]  Hey, Terry, clarification, that's practicing law from the bench.
[01:23:44.400 --> 01:23:46.400]  He's allowed to adjudicate from the bench.
[01:23:46.400 --> 01:23:47.400]  The bench is flying there.
[01:23:47.400 --> 01:23:49.400]  Yeah.
[01:23:49.400 --> 01:23:50.400]  No, no, no.
[01:23:50.400 --> 01:23:51.400]  Actually, that's right.
[01:23:51.400 --> 01:23:54.400]  He's adjudicating the case.
[01:23:54.400 --> 01:24:00.400]  The judge presides over the case, but he doesn't adjudicate the case.
[01:24:00.400 --> 01:24:03.400]  That's what the attorneys do.
[01:24:03.400 --> 01:24:07.400]  Yeah, that's what I was thinking because it didn't make any sense.
[01:24:07.400 --> 01:24:19.400]  I mean, to me, it looked like he was pretty much siding and working for the plaintiff and not being biased or non-biased.
[01:24:19.400 --> 01:24:23.400]  Right, right.
[01:24:23.400 --> 01:24:24.400]  Okay.
[01:24:24.400 --> 01:24:26.400]  Well, I appreciate your information.
[01:24:26.400 --> 01:24:27.400]  Yeah.
[01:24:27.400 --> 01:24:31.400]  Nothing takes the place of doing your homework.
[01:24:31.400 --> 01:24:33.400]  That's what I've been trying to do.
[01:24:33.400 --> 01:24:34.400]  Okay.
[01:24:34.400 --> 01:24:35.400]  Thanks a lot.
[01:24:35.400 --> 01:24:38.400]  Thanks, Terry.
[01:24:38.400 --> 01:24:41.400]  Okay, we're going now to Greg in Colorado.
[01:24:41.400 --> 01:24:43.400]  Greg, thanks for calling in.
[01:24:43.400 --> 01:24:45.400]  What's on your mind tonight?
[01:24:45.400 --> 01:24:54.400]  Hey, yeah, I'm working against a board of adjustment, and I'm trying to do all my homework that I can.
[01:24:54.400 --> 01:25:07.400]  I'm still struggling with trying to figure out how to file the tort letter to the officers that are trying to bring us forward to this board of adjustment for a zoning violation.
[01:25:07.400 --> 01:25:09.400]  Okay, tort letter is easy.
[01:25:09.400 --> 01:25:10.400]  It's not really filed.
[01:25:10.400 --> 01:25:21.400]  Tort letter is essentially just a business letter, your standard business letter, and you send it to whoever you're going to sue.
[01:25:21.400 --> 01:25:26.400]  If you're going to sue the officers in their personal capacity, you send it to them.
[01:25:26.400 --> 01:25:27.400]  Okay.
[01:25:27.400 --> 01:25:34.400]  If you're going to sue the officer in their official capacity, you send it to the head of the agency.
[01:25:34.400 --> 01:25:35.400]  Okay.
[01:25:35.400 --> 01:25:39.400]  And generally, if it's a municipal police department, you send it to the mayor.
[01:25:39.400 --> 01:25:46.400]  If it's a sheriff's department, you send it to the county commissioner's court.
[01:25:46.400 --> 01:25:48.400]  Okay.
[01:25:48.400 --> 01:25:54.400]  And then how do you move forward with the cause of action?
[01:25:54.400 --> 01:25:55.400]  Okay.
[01:25:55.400 --> 01:26:02.400]  First, you have to define your complaint against them in the terms of a cause of action.
[01:26:02.400 --> 01:26:03.400]  Okay.
[01:26:03.400 --> 01:26:09.400]  And the cause of action in civil is like a statute in criminal.
[01:26:09.400 --> 01:26:13.400]  Do you have a jurisdictionary course?
[01:26:13.400 --> 01:26:14.400]  No.
[01:26:14.400 --> 01:26:19.400]  Okay, you may want to get that because Dr. Graves lays that out for you in specific detail.
[01:26:19.400 --> 01:26:24.400]  That's all that course deals with is how to initiate lawsuits and causes of action.
[01:26:24.400 --> 01:26:25.400]  Okay.
[01:26:25.400 --> 01:26:29.400]  You can't beat that course.
[01:26:29.400 --> 01:26:33.400]  You'll be several steps ahead of the attorney once you've been through that.
[01:26:33.400 --> 01:26:34.400]  Great.
[01:26:34.400 --> 01:26:37.400]  Then you will understand the steps of the process.
[01:26:37.400 --> 01:26:38.400]  Okay.
[01:26:38.400 --> 01:26:41.400]  And then you'll be bad news.
[01:26:41.400 --> 01:26:44.400]  Okay.
[01:26:44.400 --> 01:26:50.400]  And then, you know, because I'm going through, when I look through the Constitution,
[01:26:50.400 --> 01:26:54.400]  there's like they're violating my due process of law.
[01:26:54.400 --> 01:26:59.400]  They're violating Amendment 7 where I have a right to trial by jury,
[01:26:59.400 --> 01:27:06.400]  and they're just dragging me through some three-panel board that's going to tell me if I'm guilty or not guilty.
[01:27:06.400 --> 01:27:13.400]  Well, that's an administrative process, and what is the possible punishment if you're found guilty?
[01:27:13.400 --> 01:27:17.400]  Imprisonment up to one year for every day that I'm in violation.
[01:27:17.400 --> 01:27:18.400]  Okay.
[01:27:18.400 --> 01:27:24.400]  That is a bill of attainder law, and you can fight it on those grounds alone.
[01:27:24.400 --> 01:27:35.400]  Any time that you can be imprisoned or lose property or any other right based upon an administrative or nonjudicial outcome,
[01:27:35.400 --> 01:27:41.400]  whether it be legislative or administrative, that's a bill of attainder by definition.
[01:27:41.400 --> 01:27:43.400]  And it's attainder?
[01:27:43.400 --> 01:27:46.400]  Attainder, A-T-T-A-I-N-D-E-R.
[01:27:46.400 --> 01:27:49.400]  Great.
[01:27:49.400 --> 01:27:50.400]  All right.
[01:27:50.400 --> 01:27:54.400]  And that is forbidden in every state Constitution.
[01:27:54.400 --> 01:27:56.400]  Great.
[01:27:56.400 --> 01:28:00.400]  And so I'm going to fight it on the grounds of?
[01:28:00.400 --> 01:28:01.400]  Constitutional violation.
[01:28:01.400 --> 01:28:03.400]  It is a bill of attainder statute.
[01:28:03.400 --> 01:28:05.400]  It is a bill of attainder.
[01:28:05.400 --> 01:28:06.400]  Great.
[01:28:06.400 --> 01:28:07.400]  All right.
[01:28:07.400 --> 01:28:11.400]  Well, I'll do some more work on that and get that to jurisdictionary.
[01:28:11.400 --> 01:28:12.400]  All right.
[01:28:12.400 --> 01:28:18.400]  Thanks for your time.
[01:28:18.400 --> 01:28:19.400]  All right.
[01:28:19.400 --> 01:28:20.400]  Who's next, Deborah?
[01:28:20.400 --> 01:28:22.400]  Yes, sir.
[01:28:22.400 --> 01:28:23.400]  Okay.
[01:28:23.400 --> 01:28:28.400]  We are now going to Michael in Texas.
[01:28:28.400 --> 01:28:29.400]  Michael, thanks for calling in.
[01:28:29.400 --> 01:28:31.400]  What's on your mind tonight?
[01:28:31.400 --> 01:28:33.400]  Well, I'm not sure if you guys any better.
[01:28:33.400 --> 01:28:34.400]  He couldn't stand it.
[01:28:34.400 --> 01:28:35.400]  Okay.
[01:28:35.400 --> 01:28:41.400]  Now, the situation is, I've discussed this with, I think, with Randy here previously about
[01:28:41.400 --> 01:28:45.400]  this Georgetown operation.
[01:28:45.400 --> 01:28:46.400]  Arnold Garza.
[01:28:46.400 --> 01:28:51.400]  Yeah, he went in and started a fight with the judge, and the judge threw him in jail
[01:28:51.400 --> 01:28:52.400]  for contempt.
[01:28:52.400 --> 01:28:58.400]  Well, he really didn't start a fight with him, but it turned out to be that, you know.
[01:28:58.400 --> 01:29:05.400]  He didn't explain himself well enough to the judge anyway that the contempt order is basically
[01:29:05.400 --> 01:29:12.400]  muted now because she suspended after the first writ was filed into her court three
[01:29:12.400 --> 01:29:13.400]  days later.
[01:29:13.400 --> 01:29:20.400]  The writ was filed on Thursday, and on Monday, the judge issued an order suspending the commitment,
[01:29:20.400 --> 01:29:22.400]  so for 180 days.
[01:29:22.400 --> 01:29:24.400]  So anyway, that was set aside momentarily.
[01:29:24.400 --> 01:29:32.400]  So when we went to take that suspension order over to the jail, magically, two more unspecified
[01:29:32.400 --> 01:29:37.400]  misdemeanor charges showed up, and the deputies over there didn't know what the heck was
[01:29:37.400 --> 01:29:39.400]  going on, where they were from, or anything like that.
[01:29:39.400 --> 01:29:41.400]  Well, when we went over to...
[01:29:41.400 --> 01:29:42.400]  Wait, wait.
[01:29:42.400 --> 01:29:43.400]  Hold on.
[01:29:43.400 --> 01:29:44.400]  We're about to go to break.
[01:29:44.400 --> 01:29:45.400]  Yeah.
[01:29:45.400 --> 01:29:46.400]  Can you hear the music, Greg?
[01:29:46.400 --> 01:29:47.400]  I'm sorry.
[01:29:47.400 --> 01:29:48.400]  Hello?
[01:29:48.400 --> 01:29:49.400]  Michael, can you hear the music?
[01:29:49.400 --> 01:29:50.400]  Yeah, I can hear the music.
[01:29:50.400 --> 01:29:51.400]  Okay, great.
[01:29:51.400 --> 01:29:52.400]  All right.
[01:29:52.400 --> 01:29:55.400]  So we'll be right back, and then we got Jim from Mississippi.
[01:29:55.400 --> 01:29:58.400]  Callers 512-646-1984.
[01:29:58.400 --> 01:30:04.400]  My name is Randall Kelton, and I co-host on Rule of Law Radio.
[01:30:04.400 --> 01:30:08.400]  We specialize in showing people how to strike back against corrupt public officials.
[01:30:08.400 --> 01:30:13.400]  With the mortgage crisis worsening, we set our sights on finding a remedy for people
[01:30:13.400 --> 01:30:15.400]  who have been cheated by their lenders.
[01:30:15.400 --> 01:30:19.400]  If you have a mortgage or have paid yours off, you have probably been cheated out of
[01:30:19.400 --> 01:30:21.400]  thousands, but there is a remedy.
[01:30:21.400 --> 01:30:31.400]  Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call me at 512-430-4140 and find out how to use the
[01:30:31.400 --> 01:30:36.400]  consumer protection laws to recover what the lenders have stolen through fraud and deception.
[01:30:36.400 --> 01:30:41.400]  We will prepare for you a qualified written request that will expose the fraud and put
[01:30:41.400 --> 01:30:43.400]  the lenders on the dime.
[01:30:43.400 --> 01:30:47.400]  Lender fraud is bankrupting this country, and it's time to fight back.
[01:30:47.400 --> 01:30:57.400]  Go to remediesinrealestate.com or call 512-430-4140 and get the information you need to stop the
[01:30:57.400 --> 01:31:00.400]  money changers in their tracks.
[01:31:00.400 --> 01:31:19.400]  Yeah, who you want to cheat? Who you take with me? Free Tully. Who you want to cheat?
[01:31:19.400 --> 01:31:44.400]  Okay, we're back. We're speaking with Michael in Texas.
[01:31:44.400 --> 01:31:47.400]  Okay, Michael, continue please.
[01:31:47.400 --> 01:31:53.400]  All right. Well, the situation was that we then went over to a Bales Bonds because I
[01:31:53.400 --> 01:31:57.400]  know that the Bales Bonds people have access to computers and information that the average
[01:31:57.400 --> 01:32:00.400]  Joe Blow and the public doesn't have.
[01:32:00.400 --> 01:32:06.400]  Well, they pulled up the two miscellaneous charges, and they were out of JP number four,
[01:32:06.400 --> 01:32:10.400]  which is out in Taylor, and they had a $5,000 bond breach on it.
[01:32:10.400 --> 01:32:18.400]  So we prepared a writ, went out to Taylor, and lo and behold on Wednesday the place was
[01:32:18.400 --> 01:32:24.400]  closed, so I went back on Thursday, and they said, well, these charges aren't in Taylor.
[01:32:24.400 --> 01:32:30.400]  I said, well, they're not. Well, they're all listed as JP four, so went back and filed
[01:32:30.400 --> 01:32:38.400]  another writ back into the original court and come to find out that all the hullabaloo
[01:32:38.400 --> 01:32:45.400]  was about keeping him in jail, Arnold Gars in jail, and this is my opinion of what happened
[01:32:45.400 --> 01:32:50.400]  here. My opinion isn't worth much because you're not paying for it, but here's what
[01:32:50.400 --> 01:32:51.400]  I believe happened.
[01:32:51.400 --> 01:32:58.400]  The attorney that was appointed to Arnold Gars of Keith Lauerman was pissed because
[01:32:58.400 --> 01:33:05.400]  Arnold would not accept him as an attorney, and he retaliated against Arnold by telling
[01:33:05.400 --> 01:33:10.400]  the judge that he thought the guy was incompetent because he couldn't communicate or wouldn't
[01:33:10.400 --> 01:33:14.400]  communicate with him, and then they got the psychiatrist to come in and confirm that,
[01:33:14.400 --> 01:33:17.400]  and all of a sudden Arnold's looking at the mental hospital.
[01:33:17.400 --> 01:33:24.400]  Whoa, whoa. Wait a minute. Hold on. How did they get a competency hearing?
[01:33:24.400 --> 01:33:27.400]  Well, they didn't have a competency hearing.
[01:33:27.400 --> 01:33:33.400]  Okay, you need to have his attorney, whoever was the attorney now, demand a Daubert's hearing.
[01:33:33.400 --> 01:33:41.400]  Well, the thing is, what he's saying, though, is that this attorney that he didn't want
[01:33:41.400 --> 01:33:43.400]  to have is the one that caused this to happen.
[01:33:43.400 --> 01:33:44.400]  Doesn't matter.
[01:33:44.400 --> 01:33:48.400]  Well, wait a second. But he's not positive that's what's going on. He said this was
[01:33:48.400 --> 01:33:49.400]  his opinion of what happened.
[01:33:49.400 --> 01:33:56.400]  Okay. If he's been declared incompetent, a psychologist had to do that.
[01:33:56.400 --> 01:33:59.400]  Correct. But doesn't it take two psychologists?
[01:33:59.400 --> 01:34:05.400]  No. It takes two to unscrew a light bulb.
[01:34:05.400 --> 01:34:06.400]  Okay.
[01:34:06.400 --> 01:34:10.400]  One to hold the light bulb and the other to turn the ladder, but they can't do it unless
[01:34:10.400 --> 01:34:16.400]  the light bulb wants to change. But no, it takes one. But whoever did this without a
[01:34:16.400 --> 01:34:22.400]  competency hearing, you need to have a Daubert's hearing to test the psychiatrist and then
[01:34:22.400 --> 01:34:27.400]  file a complaint with the Board of Psychology against the psychiatrist. That'll end his
[01:34:27.400 --> 01:34:32.400]  career. And he will be real excited about that.
[01:34:32.400 --> 01:34:33.400]  A Daubert's hearing?
[01:34:33.400 --> 01:34:40.400]  Yes, a Daubert's hearing. A Daubert's hearing is a hearing for the purpose to test the
[01:34:40.400 --> 01:34:49.400]  ability of a expert witness. Now, in case Dr. Reese is listening, it's a psychiatrist.
[01:34:49.400 --> 01:34:53.400]  It takes two psychiatrists to change a light bulb, not psychologists.
[01:34:53.400 --> 01:34:57.400]  Yeah. A Daubert's hearing, okay.
[01:34:57.400 --> 01:35:02.400]  Yes, a Daubert's hearing. And you need to get a bar grievance against that attorney
[01:35:02.400 --> 01:35:10.400]  for not adequately defending the client and one for improperly requiring a competency
[01:35:10.400 --> 01:35:14.400]  hearing. Two of them pretty well end his career.
[01:35:14.400 --> 01:35:17.400]  He's running for a judge up there in Williams County.
[01:35:17.400 --> 01:35:20.400]  This will hurt him really bad.
[01:35:20.400 --> 01:35:21.400]  Is that right?
[01:35:21.400 --> 01:35:22.400]  Yes, it will.
[01:35:22.400 --> 01:35:28.400]  Okay. All right. We can do that. That'll be the start.
[01:35:28.400 --> 01:35:31.400]  Yeah, I'm not fully understanding how he's still being held.
[01:35:31.400 --> 01:35:34.400]  Yes, sir. Because see, here's the thing.
[01:35:34.400 --> 01:35:35.400]  Wait, wait.
[01:35:35.400 --> 01:35:43.400]  Well, Mr. Garza, if you'll agree that you are incompetent to stand trial, we will release
[01:35:43.400 --> 01:35:45.400]  you on a personal recognition fine.
[01:35:45.400 --> 01:35:52.400]  Okay, stop. Stop. That's his standard stuff. Where is, okay, whose name is on the warrant?
[01:35:52.400 --> 01:35:56.400]  What JP's name is on the warrant?
[01:35:56.400 --> 01:36:03.400]  I don't know. I didn't see any warrant. These charges, the two charges that were pending
[01:36:03.400 --> 01:36:08.400]  have never shown up as a case. We've never seen any warrant, anything in it.
[01:36:08.400 --> 01:36:15.400]  Okay. Go to every magistrate in the county, primarily the JP's.
[01:36:15.400 --> 01:36:16.400]  Okay.
[01:36:16.400 --> 01:36:27.400]  Demand to see the warrant. And notice the JP of 15.16 Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:36:27.400 --> 01:36:34.400]  It commands the magistrate who issues a warrant to, after the execution of the warrant, to
[01:36:34.400 --> 01:36:38.400]  immediately make the warrant available for public inspection.
[01:36:38.400 --> 01:36:45.400]  Go to all of the magistrates, and when you don't get a warrant from any of them,
[01:36:45.400 --> 01:36:51.400]  then call the police and file a criminal charge against each one of them.
[01:36:51.400 --> 01:36:55.400]  You don't know which one it is, but it's one of them.
[01:36:55.400 --> 01:37:01.400]  Somebody has to have produced the warrant because the police said there is one.
[01:37:01.400 --> 01:37:07.400]  So you start filing on the judges. The judges are not going to be happy.
[01:37:07.400 --> 01:37:12.400]  Make up a judicial conduct complaint against each one of the judges.
[01:37:12.400 --> 01:37:19.400]  File those. The judges are going to be really unhappy at whoever is pushing these warrants around.
[01:37:19.400 --> 01:37:25.400]  And go to the county judge, the county clerk and demand to see the warrants.
[01:37:25.400 --> 01:37:29.400]  And if they don't have a warrant there, file a judicial conduct complaint against
[01:37:29.400 --> 01:37:35.400]  every county judge in the county. That's going to get their attention.
[01:37:35.400 --> 01:37:41.400]  And if you do it, as a third apparently uninterested party,
[01:37:41.400 --> 01:37:45.400]  that's really going to make them nuts because they can't even mention it to you.
[01:37:45.400 --> 01:37:51.400]  If anybody mentions it to you, you call the police. That's tampering with the witness.
[01:37:51.400 --> 01:37:53.400]  It's absolutely forbidden to even talk about it once it's filed.
[01:37:53.400 --> 01:37:55.400]  You can't talk about it. They can't talk about it.
[01:37:55.400 --> 01:37:59.400]  I see. So that gives them a problem.
[01:37:59.400 --> 01:38:03.400]  They got a third party in there taking shots at them.
[01:38:03.400 --> 01:38:07.400]  And they have no recourse. And they can go to Garza and say,
[01:38:07.400 --> 01:38:10.400]  does Garza know you? Oh yeah.
[01:38:10.400 --> 01:38:15.400]  Get somebody that he don't know to do it. Okay.
[01:38:15.400 --> 01:38:19.400]  And he can legitimately say, I don't know this guy from Adam.
[01:38:19.400 --> 01:38:23.400]  And that will drive the courts nuts. They are very corrupt.
[01:38:23.400 --> 01:38:28.400]  When it looks like they got somebody shooting at them from the outside,
[01:38:28.400 --> 01:38:30.400]  they get real concern.
[01:38:30.400 --> 01:38:35.400]  We had a good woman in jail, fourth DUI. She's looking 25 to life.
[01:38:35.400 --> 01:38:40.400]  I went in there, no connection to her. File a writ on her behalf.
[01:38:40.400 --> 01:38:43.400]  The jailer, well, I gave it to her first.
[01:38:43.400 --> 01:38:47.400]  And the jailer who does the notaries wouldn't notarize it.
[01:38:47.400 --> 01:38:51.400]  So Deborah and me and we took a camera crew down there and went to the jail
[01:38:51.400 --> 01:38:54.400]  and just raised a great big stink.
[01:38:54.400 --> 01:39:01.400]  And then I went in and filed the writ myself with a district judge there.
[01:39:01.400 --> 01:39:04.400]  And he was really, really unhappy.
[01:39:04.400 --> 01:39:08.400]  And I was not impressed with his unhappiness.
[01:39:08.400 --> 01:39:11.400]  And made it real clear to him I wasn't impressed. He was upset.
[01:39:11.400 --> 01:39:14.400]  Mr. Calvin, I don't have time for this. I have a jury to impound.
[01:39:14.400 --> 01:39:18.400]  Well, with all due respect, Your Honor, that's a writ of habeas corpus you're holding.
[01:39:18.400 --> 01:39:21.400]  And everything stands down before the writ.
[01:39:21.400 --> 01:39:23.400]  Well, Mr. Calvin, I have to have time to read it.
[01:39:23.400 --> 01:39:25.400]  Well, you just take your time while you're at it. Read these.
[01:39:25.400 --> 01:39:27.400]  And I gave him a whole stack of criminal complaints,
[01:39:27.400 --> 01:39:31.400]  which he refused to take and asked the bailiff to arrest him.
[01:39:31.400 --> 01:39:36.400]  The judge stormed out, you jerk.
[01:39:36.400 --> 01:39:39.400]  They bring her into court the next day.
[01:39:39.400 --> 01:39:42.400]  Her attorney goes out, talks to the prosecutor, comes in and says,
[01:39:42.400 --> 01:39:49.400]  if you'll take Class B misdemeanor, public intoxication time served,
[01:39:49.400 --> 01:39:54.400]  he'll do the deal just to get you out of his jail.
[01:39:54.400 --> 01:39:58.400]  The third party come in and start shooting at them.
[01:39:58.400 --> 01:40:03.400]  Then they start looking in their closets. They all know they're dirty.
[01:40:03.400 --> 01:40:04.400]  Yeah.
[01:40:04.400 --> 01:40:07.400]  And when they think they got somebody they can't control looking at them,
[01:40:07.400 --> 01:40:09.400]  they get real scared real fast.
[01:40:09.400 --> 01:40:12.400]  Debra can tell you about that.
[01:40:12.400 --> 01:40:18.400]  She nailed the county attorney big time in Williamson County.
[01:40:18.400 --> 01:40:20.400]  That's what I suggest.
[01:40:20.400 --> 01:40:25.400]  That warrant has to be made available for the public immediately after execution
[01:40:25.400 --> 01:40:28.400]  to keep exactly this from happening.
[01:40:28.400 --> 01:40:34.400]  Rewrite the warrant, take it to the Court of Criminal Appeals.
[01:40:34.400 --> 01:40:35.400]  Rewrite the warrant.
[01:40:35.400 --> 01:40:37.400]  I meant writ.
[01:40:37.400 --> 01:40:38.400]  Oh, okay.
[01:40:38.400 --> 01:40:42.400]  I've got one pending in the Court of Criminal Appeals right now.
[01:40:42.400 --> 01:40:44.400]  On this guy?
[01:40:44.400 --> 01:40:45.400]  Yes.
[01:40:45.400 --> 01:40:48.400]  Okay, go down there and how long have they had it?
[01:40:48.400 --> 01:40:51.400]  Just a couple days, just last the end of last week.
[01:40:51.400 --> 01:40:55.400]  Okay, go down Monday and ask the clerk if the Court of Criminal Appeals
[01:40:55.400 --> 01:40:57.400]  has met and heard anything.
[01:40:57.400 --> 01:41:01.400]  And if he says yes, file criminal charges against him.
[01:41:01.400 --> 01:41:05.400]  Everything stands down before the writ, everything.
[01:41:05.400 --> 01:41:07.400]  Uh-huh.
[01:41:07.400 --> 01:41:08.400]  I did that to him once.
[01:41:08.400 --> 01:41:10.400]  Somebody needs to do it to him again.
[01:41:10.400 --> 01:41:11.400]  Uh-huh.
[01:41:11.400 --> 01:41:13.400]  And just stir up as much stink as you can.
[01:41:13.400 --> 01:41:16.400]  They're going to want this guy out of there to get you guys off his back.
[01:41:16.400 --> 01:41:19.400]  Right, right.
[01:41:19.400 --> 01:41:21.400]  Okay, any other?
[01:41:21.400 --> 01:41:22.400]  That's it.
[01:41:22.400 --> 01:41:23.400]  Okay.
[01:41:23.400 --> 01:41:24.400]  Thank you, sir.
[01:41:24.400 --> 01:41:27.400]  Good luck and if you have any questions on how to prepare the documents,
[01:41:27.400 --> 01:41:28.400]  give me a call.
[01:41:28.400 --> 01:41:29.400]  See you.
[01:41:29.400 --> 01:41:30.400]  Okey-doke.
[01:41:30.400 --> 01:41:32.400]  Okay, great.
[01:41:32.400 --> 01:41:37.400]  All right, we are going now to Jim in Mississippi.
[01:41:37.400 --> 01:41:38.400]  Jim, thanks for calling in.
[01:41:38.400 --> 01:41:40.400]  What's on your mind tonight?
[01:41:40.400 --> 01:41:45.400]  Well, I would like to propose for your consideration that we have
[01:41:45.400 --> 01:41:53.400]  a dangerous misnomer in this country that all religions should share
[01:41:53.400 --> 01:41:58.400]  and hold constitutional standing.
[01:41:58.400 --> 01:41:59.400]  What?
[01:41:59.400 --> 01:42:02.400]  You're kidding.
[01:42:02.400 --> 01:42:06.400]  You want to superimpose religion on the state?
[01:42:06.400 --> 01:42:10.400]  I thought the Bible told you not to do that.
[01:42:10.400 --> 01:42:16.400]  What I'm saying is that we need to qualify what religions should hold
[01:42:16.400 --> 01:42:18.400]  constitutional standing.
[01:42:18.400 --> 01:42:21.400]  None should hold constitutional standing.
[01:42:21.400 --> 01:42:23.400]  No, I disagree totally.
[01:42:23.400 --> 01:42:24.400]  Religions stand on their own.
[01:42:24.400 --> 01:42:27.400]  They don't need any government to justify them.
[01:42:27.400 --> 01:42:33.400]  Yes, and also the First Amendment says that Congress shall make no law
[01:42:33.400 --> 01:42:36.400]  infringing on the freedom of religion.
[01:42:36.400 --> 01:42:42.400]  And if you start getting into delineating which ones, no way.
[01:42:42.400 --> 01:42:43.400]  No way.
[01:42:43.400 --> 01:42:49.400]  What happens when you have one that is on its face subversive?
[01:42:49.400 --> 01:42:53.400]  That's between their God and their conscience.
[01:42:53.400 --> 01:42:54.400]  Yeah.
[01:42:54.400 --> 01:42:56.400]  It's not your business or mine.
[01:42:56.400 --> 01:42:57.400]  That's right.
[01:42:57.400 --> 01:42:59.400]  Therefore, judge not.
[01:42:59.400 --> 01:43:01.400]  This is deep water.
[01:43:01.400 --> 01:43:03.400]  I disagree totally.
[01:43:03.400 --> 01:43:07.400]  That's where I think the preamble of the Constitution plays a vital role.
[01:43:07.400 --> 01:43:13.400]  I mean, listen, if you're going to have a religion that, you know,
[01:43:13.400 --> 01:43:18.400]  that it's pleasing to God to do human sacrifices or something,
[01:43:18.400 --> 01:43:24.400]  I mean, something like that is not going to be constitutionally protected
[01:43:24.400 --> 01:43:27.400]  under the First Amendment for freedom of religion.
[01:43:27.400 --> 01:43:29.400]  Murder is still murder.
[01:43:29.400 --> 01:43:32.400]  So I don't quite know what you're getting at.
[01:43:32.400 --> 01:43:34.400]  And sorry if we seem to kind of land on you.
[01:43:34.400 --> 01:43:36.400]  We don't mean to do that.
[01:43:36.400 --> 01:43:37.400]  That's a perfect example.
[01:43:37.400 --> 01:43:38.400]  Okay.
[01:43:38.400 --> 01:43:39.400]  Well, too bad.
[01:43:39.400 --> 01:43:40.400]  Hold on.
[01:43:40.400 --> 01:43:41.400]  Too bad.
[01:43:41.400 --> 01:43:42.400]  Let's pick this up on the other side.
[01:43:42.400 --> 01:43:46.400]  This is going to be fun.
[01:43:46.400 --> 01:43:47.400]  Yeah, too bad.
[01:43:47.400 --> 01:43:48.400]  Murder is still murder.
[01:43:48.400 --> 01:43:53.400]  And you can't say, well, it's okay because God told me to do it.
[01:43:53.400 --> 01:43:54.400]  That's not going to fly.
[01:43:54.400 --> 01:43:59.400]  That's not protected under First Amendment.
[01:43:59.400 --> 01:44:04.400]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:44:04.400 --> 01:44:08.400]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:44:08.400 --> 01:44:12.400]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors,
[01:44:12.400 --> 01:44:14.400]  and now you can win too.
[01:44:14.400 --> 01:44:18.400]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court
[01:44:18.400 --> 01:44:20.400]  using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:44:20.400 --> 01:44:24.400]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[01:44:24.400 --> 01:44:26.400]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[01:44:26.400 --> 01:44:28.400]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[01:44:28.400 --> 01:44:33.400]  How to turn to financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:44:33.400 --> 01:44:38.400]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:38.400 --> 01:44:40.400]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:40.400 --> 01:44:43.400]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:44:43.400 --> 01:44:49.400]  and click on the blue Michael Mears banner or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:44:49.400 --> 01:44:57.400]  That's ruleoflawradio.com or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com
[01:44:57.400 --> 01:45:00.400]  to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:45:00.400 --> 01:45:21.400]  MUSIC
[01:45:21.400 --> 01:45:30.400]  Some things in this world I will never understand. Some things I realize fully.
[01:45:30.400 --> 01:45:38.400]  Somebody's gonna police that policeman. Somebody's gonna police the bully.
[01:45:38.400 --> 01:45:43.400]  There's always a room at the top of the hill.
[01:45:43.400 --> 01:45:47.400]  I hear through the grapevine and it's lonely there too.
[01:45:47.400 --> 01:45:51.400]  They're wishing it was more than I position the bill.
[01:45:51.400 --> 01:45:55.400]  They know that if they don't do it, somebody will.
[01:45:55.400 --> 01:46:03.400]  Some things in this world I will never understand. Some things I realize fully.
[01:46:03.400 --> 01:46:11.400]  Somebody's gonna police that policeman. Somebody's gonna police the bully.
[01:46:11.400 --> 01:46:17.400]  I know they will. Yeah, they're gonna put the bill.
[01:46:17.400 --> 01:46:21.400]  Because I don't see so much interest in this deal.
[01:46:21.400 --> 01:46:24.400]  I know they will never fail.
[01:46:24.400 --> 01:46:29.400]  Okay, this is Randy Kelton, Debra Steven, Eddie Craig.
[01:46:29.400 --> 01:46:35.400]  We're back and we were talking to Jim in Mississippi.
[01:46:35.400 --> 01:46:37.400]  Is that right? Yeah, don't jump. Okay.
[01:46:37.400 --> 01:46:39.400]  Yes, Jim in Mississippi.
[01:46:39.400 --> 01:46:42.400]  Okay, I kind of jumped on you a little quick.
[01:46:42.400 --> 01:46:46.400]  And I didn't give you time to really explain what you were talking about.
[01:46:46.400 --> 01:46:49.400]  And I apologize for that.
[01:46:49.400 --> 01:46:53.400]  Explain to us what you were really getting at.
[01:46:53.400 --> 01:47:01.400]  Well, I perceive that the religion of Islam has been the subversion.
[01:47:01.400 --> 01:47:04.400]  And I think its doctrines are pretty...
[01:47:04.400 --> 01:47:09.400]  What are you referring to, subversion?
[01:47:09.400 --> 01:47:18.400]  That they wish to have this country ruled by Sharia law and replace the constitutional government.
[01:47:18.400 --> 01:47:21.400]  Okay, wait, wait. Okay, stop. Stop. Wait a minute. Wait a minute.
[01:47:21.400 --> 01:47:29.400]  I have a question. Would you rather it be ruled by Christian law?
[01:47:29.400 --> 01:47:31.400]  Wait a minute. I have a different question.
[01:47:31.400 --> 01:47:34.400]  Who's more right here?
[01:47:34.400 --> 01:47:40.400]  Yes, and also I have something else to point out regarding what subversion and what sedition is.
[01:47:40.400 --> 01:47:44.400]  And I just read something about that in Texas law.
[01:47:44.400 --> 01:47:52.400]  And it says that by force of overthrow, violent overthrow, you can't do that.
[01:47:52.400 --> 01:47:57.400]  However, planning to do it and making a plan in your mind that,
[01:47:57.400 --> 01:48:03.400]  well, I want the government now to be ruled by Arabic religious doctrine.
[01:48:03.400 --> 01:48:09.400]  Okay, just having that belief or having that faith system doesn't necessarily make it subversive
[01:48:09.400 --> 01:48:13.400]  unless the person plans on doing it forcefully and violently.
[01:48:13.400 --> 01:48:16.400]  But if you plan on making those changes in our government,
[01:48:16.400 --> 01:48:22.400]  legitimately like having constitutional amendments passed, say for example,
[01:48:22.400 --> 01:48:27.400]  having laws, changing laws in the legislature or voting people into office
[01:48:27.400 --> 01:48:31.400]  who would pass different laws to make it be that way,
[01:48:31.400 --> 01:48:37.400]  well then that is a legitimate change of government that is not subversive.
[01:48:37.400 --> 01:48:43.400]  Or you could even send people out to try to convince other people to follow your belief system.
[01:48:43.400 --> 01:48:48.400]  Sure, just because somebody wants to change the law or change the government
[01:48:48.400 --> 01:48:54.400]  to make it follow Arabic doctrines, that doesn't mean that they're subversive.
[01:48:54.400 --> 01:48:58.400]  That doesn't mean that the faith of the religion itself is subversive.
[01:48:58.400 --> 01:49:01.400]  What if there was one that was?
[01:49:01.400 --> 01:49:04.400]  Then they would be in violation of a specific statute.
[01:49:04.400 --> 01:49:06.400]  We don't need any special law for that.
[01:49:06.400 --> 01:49:09.400]  And I also say that just because you think something in your mind
[01:49:09.400 --> 01:49:12.400]  or believe something in a certain way,
[01:49:12.400 --> 01:49:16.400]  that doesn't mean that you're committing any subversive act.
[01:49:16.400 --> 01:49:22.400]  I mean, it all boils down to what people do, not what people think, okay,
[01:49:22.400 --> 01:49:25.400]  or what they feel in their heart or believe.
[01:49:25.400 --> 01:49:29.400]  Right, God can hold you responsible for what you believe in your heart.
[01:49:29.400 --> 01:49:33.400]  Yeah, but we hold you, man holds you responsible for what you do.
[01:49:33.400 --> 01:49:36.400]  Yeah, however, we don't want the government doing that.
[01:49:36.400 --> 01:49:37.400]  No, I don't think so.
[01:49:37.400 --> 01:49:41.400]  And that's where we're going toward and what you're proposing terrifies me.
[01:49:41.400 --> 01:49:44.400]  Yes, absolutely, you know.
[01:49:44.400 --> 01:49:49.400]  Just the idea that we would condemn a religion because it's a religion
[01:49:49.400 --> 01:49:54.400]  and ask that one religion be set above another, that's terrifying.
[01:49:54.400 --> 01:49:56.400]  You understand that.
[01:49:56.400 --> 01:50:00.400]  More people through history have been murdered in the name of religion
[01:50:00.400 --> 01:50:03.400]  than in all of the wars in history.
[01:50:03.400 --> 01:50:05.400]  That should warn us.
[01:50:05.400 --> 01:50:06.400]  Be careful.
[01:50:06.400 --> 01:50:07.400]  Can I offer something?
[01:50:07.400 --> 01:50:08.400]  Yeah.
[01:50:08.400 --> 01:50:15.400]  I think that as long as religions are reasonably balanced,
[01:50:15.400 --> 01:50:19.400]  and this is through the voice of the people in any given state,
[01:50:19.400 --> 01:50:21.400]  they can use this formula,
[01:50:21.400 --> 01:50:28.400]  as long as in their conscience that religions are harmoniously balanced
[01:50:28.400 --> 01:50:32.400]  with the principles of the preamble of the U.S. Constitution,
[01:50:32.400 --> 01:50:38.400]  then it could be understood as having constitutional standing.
[01:50:38.400 --> 01:50:50.400]  If you have a religion that espouses human sacrifices or subversion,
[01:50:50.400 --> 01:50:52.400]  then how can that be in balance?
[01:50:52.400 --> 01:50:55.400]  Wait a minute, you need to be careful here.
[01:50:55.400 --> 01:50:57.400]  You're stepping off into deep water.
[01:50:57.400 --> 01:50:58.400]  This is crazy.
[01:50:58.400 --> 01:51:00.400]  You need to try to read that Old Testament.
[01:51:00.400 --> 01:51:01.400]  This is absolutely crazy.
[01:51:01.400 --> 01:51:02.400]  I'm sorry.
[01:51:02.400 --> 01:51:09.400]  You understand that the Muslims and the Christians are both Jewish sects.
[01:51:09.400 --> 01:51:13.400]  They're a root of the same religion.
[01:51:13.400 --> 01:51:15.400]  Muhammad went one way, Jesus went another way.
[01:51:15.400 --> 01:51:16.400]  No, that's not exactly true.
[01:51:16.400 --> 01:51:18.400]  That's exactly true.
[01:51:18.400 --> 01:51:19.400]  No, it's not.
[01:51:19.400 --> 01:51:23.400]  Jacob, no, they were both descended from Abraham,
[01:51:23.400 --> 01:51:28.400]  and it was Ishmael that went one way,
[01:51:28.400 --> 01:51:31.400]  and Jacob went the other way.
[01:51:31.400 --> 01:51:35.400]  It was Jesus who separated from the Jews into Christianity.
[01:51:35.400 --> 01:51:40.400]  It was Muhammad who separated from the Jews into the Muslim belief.
[01:51:40.400 --> 01:51:42.400]  These are both Jewish sects.
[01:51:42.400 --> 01:51:44.400]  They're both from the same religion.
[01:51:44.400 --> 01:51:51.400]  You guys, we all carry a common history, and both are equally bloody.
[01:51:51.400 --> 01:51:54.400]  Look, the whole point is none of that even matters.
[01:51:54.400 --> 01:51:55.400]  Right.
[01:51:55.400 --> 01:52:03.400]  You can't have the government, and I'm just going to apply this beyond religious beliefs.
[01:52:03.400 --> 01:52:11.400]  I am in complete disagreement with the government having anything to do with prohibiting
[01:52:11.400 --> 01:52:22.400]  or issuing penalties for things that people think or say or write down.
[01:52:22.400 --> 01:52:28.400]  Anything that you are, unless it's, it depends, unless it's under oath
[01:52:28.400 --> 01:52:31.400]  and you've perjured yourself in writing or something like that,
[01:52:31.400 --> 01:52:36.400]  but just because you think a certain way or believe a certain saying
[01:52:36.400 --> 01:52:40.400]  or hold to a certain belief system in religion or say something,
[01:52:40.400 --> 01:52:46.400]  this is why I hate all these hate crimes, speaking of hate, all these hate laws.
[01:52:46.400 --> 01:52:50.400]  Whatever happened to the First Amendment, protection of freedom of speech,
[01:52:50.400 --> 01:52:54.400]  protection of freedom of religion, the government, I do not believe,
[01:52:54.400 --> 01:52:59.400]  I completely, 100% disagree that the government should have anything to do
[01:52:59.400 --> 01:53:04.400]  with restricting or penalizing or even protecting for that matter,
[01:53:04.400 --> 01:53:10.400]  giving out privileges to certain groups because they feel a certain way
[01:53:10.400 --> 01:53:15.400]  or think a certain way or profess to believe a certain way or say certain things.
[01:53:15.400 --> 01:53:20.400]  No, the government shouldn't penalize or offer privileges for things
[01:53:20.400 --> 01:53:25.400]  that people think or believe or say, period, in a story, all right?
[01:53:25.400 --> 01:53:28.400]  Only for what people do.
[01:53:28.400 --> 01:53:34.400]  You should have the absolute right to believe any way you want to as long as you agree with me.
[01:53:34.400 --> 01:53:37.400]  If you don't agree with me, I want the government to kick your behind.
[01:53:37.400 --> 01:53:38.400]  Yeah, give me a break.
[01:53:38.400 --> 01:53:40.400]  I'm not being facetious here.
[01:53:40.400 --> 01:53:45.400]  This is a really slippery slope, and it's my position.
[01:53:45.400 --> 01:53:47.400]  I want to believe however I choose,
[01:53:47.400 --> 01:53:50.400]  and I don't want the government to have anything to say about it.
[01:53:50.400 --> 01:53:51.400]  You know what?
[01:53:51.400 --> 01:53:53.400]  I believe that there shouldn't even be a government.
[01:53:53.400 --> 01:53:56.400]  So what does that make me, seditious?
[01:53:56.400 --> 01:54:02.400]  Okay, but the difference is here, I'm not going to go firebomb Washington, D.C.,
[01:54:02.400 --> 01:54:09.400]  but what I would do is I would teach people the fundamental basic principles
[01:54:09.400 --> 01:54:15.400]  of the Christian belief system and of libertarianism and things like that
[01:54:15.400 --> 01:54:19.400]  and try to educate people into a higher consciousness to realize
[01:54:19.400 --> 01:54:24.400]  that we really don't need government and that we should slowly roll back
[01:54:24.400 --> 01:54:27.400]  on big government, less and less and less.
[01:54:27.400 --> 01:54:31.400]  Yes, and I need to qualify a statement.
[01:54:31.400 --> 01:54:35.400]  Before you do that, I would jump in and say, slowly roll back?
[01:54:35.400 --> 01:54:36.400]  Oh, hell no.
[01:54:36.400 --> 01:54:41.400]  Well, what I'm saying, but the point is how you roll it back,
[01:54:41.400 --> 01:54:46.400]  through legislative change, through the court systems, legitimate channels,
[01:54:46.400 --> 01:54:52.400]  not let's go take down the government with violent overthrow.
[01:54:52.400 --> 01:54:56.400]  So you have to be careful, and even if somebody did believe
[01:54:56.400 --> 01:55:03.400]  that we should go firebomb Washington, D.C., well, so what?
[01:55:03.400 --> 01:55:07.400]  Unless they actually do it, who cares?
[01:55:07.400 --> 01:55:12.400]  Yeah, and let me qualify a statement I made about more people being killed
[01:55:12.400 --> 01:55:15.400]  in the name of religion than in all the wars in history.
[01:55:15.400 --> 01:55:18.400]  That wasn't because of the religions.
[01:55:18.400 --> 01:55:23.400]  It was because of people purporting to act in the name of those religions.
[01:55:23.400 --> 01:55:25.400]  That's what's scary.
[01:55:25.400 --> 01:55:29.400]  There's nothing basically wrong with the Muslim belief system
[01:55:29.400 --> 01:55:32.400]  so long as they keep it within themselves.
[01:55:32.400 --> 01:55:37.400]  Yes, and here's the other thing about his constitutional standing.
[01:55:37.400 --> 01:55:44.400]  People have to realize what the goal, what the role of the Constitution really is.
[01:55:44.400 --> 01:55:46.400]  It's not an expansive document.
[01:55:46.400 --> 01:55:49.400]  It is not a document that grants privileges.
[01:55:49.400 --> 01:55:55.400]  It's not a document that allows us or government to do certain things.
[01:55:55.400 --> 01:56:00.400]  The Constitution, and especially the Bill of Rights, is a restrictive document.
[01:56:00.400 --> 01:56:04.400]  It puts severe limitations on the government, okay?
[01:56:04.400 --> 01:56:08.400]  It doesn't give standing or give some kind of special, you know,
[01:56:08.400 --> 01:56:12.400]  privileged stance to certain groups of people.
[01:56:12.400 --> 01:56:14.400]  That's why I don't believe in group rights.
[01:56:14.400 --> 01:56:20.400]  There is no such thing as group rights, women's rights or minority's rights or gay rights.
[01:56:20.400 --> 01:56:24.400]  There is no such thing because we are not a collective.
[01:56:24.400 --> 01:56:26.400]  That is a collectivist mentality.
[01:56:26.400 --> 01:56:32.400]  We don't have, we're not like a brick of cheese and we slice off individuals from,
[01:56:32.400 --> 01:56:36.400]  you know, like slices of cheese and that makes who we are.
[01:56:36.400 --> 01:56:40.400]  No, we are a group because we started off as individuals
[01:56:40.400 --> 01:56:44.400]  and we came together in agreement to be a group, okay?
[01:56:44.400 --> 01:56:46.400]  Good point, good point.
[01:56:46.400 --> 01:56:49.400]  Unless you're just, you know, you're naturally a man or a woman,
[01:56:49.400 --> 01:56:50.400]  well then you don't make that choice.
[01:56:50.400 --> 01:56:54.400]  But the whole point is the Constitution, the role of government and the Constitution
[01:56:54.400 --> 01:57:00.400]  is not to grant any kind of privileged stance to any group of people,
[01:57:00.400 --> 01:57:03.400]  whether it is a religious group or any other group.
[01:57:03.400 --> 01:57:08.400]  The Constitution is to restrict government from infringing on our life,
[01:57:08.400 --> 01:57:11.400]  liberty and property without due process.
[01:57:11.400 --> 01:57:16.400]  So I think people need to come to a new way of thinking about the role of government
[01:57:16.400 --> 01:57:18.400]  and what the Constitution really is.
[01:57:18.400 --> 01:57:20.400]  Yeah, that's a good point.
[01:57:20.400 --> 01:57:24.400]  I got caught up in the argument and I missed the most important point.
[01:57:24.400 --> 01:57:28.400]  And sorry, Marcus, we got caught up in one we wanted to get to you,
[01:57:28.400 --> 01:57:34.400]  but we kind of got caught up in this rather divisive issue.
[01:57:34.400 --> 01:57:38.400]  And Jim, I hope you don't think we're deliberately stepping on you,
[01:57:38.400 --> 01:57:41.400]  but this is really, I think, an important issue.
[01:57:41.400 --> 01:57:44.400]  It is, and that's why I wanted to talk about the role of the Constitution
[01:57:44.400 --> 01:57:47.400]  and the government to get it actually off of the religious issue
[01:57:47.400 --> 01:57:49.400]  because this goes beyond religion.
[01:57:49.400 --> 01:57:52.400]  This is about what the role of government really is,
[01:57:52.400 --> 01:57:57.400]  and it's not to protect or privilege certain groups,
[01:57:57.400 --> 01:58:03.400]  and it sure as heck is not to provide services.
[01:58:03.400 --> 01:58:06.400]  It's to keep them out of our hair.
[01:58:06.400 --> 01:58:12.400]  The only role of government is that we contract law enforcement
[01:58:12.400 --> 01:58:18.400]  to protect our life, liberty and property so that we don't have to do it ourselves.
[01:58:18.400 --> 01:58:21.400]  And we do have the authority to do it ourselves.
[01:58:21.400 --> 01:58:23.400]  If somebody's coming after us trying to kill us,
[01:58:23.400 --> 01:58:26.400]  I have the right to defend myself and my life, okay?
[01:58:26.400 --> 01:58:29.400]  But at any rate, that's the role of government.
[01:58:29.400 --> 01:58:31.400]  We have to talk about the role of government and the role of Constitution
[01:58:31.400 --> 01:58:34.400]  before we start asking the government to do a bunch of things for us
[01:58:34.400 --> 01:58:40.400]  because we really don't want the government to do anything for us, period.
[01:58:40.400 --> 01:58:42.400]  They're not here to offer us services.
[01:58:42.400 --> 01:58:47.400]  The more services, the more privileges the government grants to us,
[01:58:47.400 --> 01:58:52.400]  the more we allow that, the more our liberty and our freedoms will be taken from us.
[01:58:52.400 --> 01:58:54.400]  We cannot allow that.
[01:58:54.400 --> 01:58:56.400]  All right, we will be back Thursday night.
[01:58:56.400 --> 01:58:58.400]  Sorry, Marcus, call back in.
[01:58:58.400 --> 01:59:20.400]  I'm like a stepping grave, I don't know what's my size, I'm dangerous, dangerous.
[01:59:20.400 --> 01:59:42.400]  I'm like a stepping grave, I don't know what's my size, I'm dangerous, dangerous.
[01:59:42.400 --> 01:59:59.400]  I'm like a stepping grave, I don't know what's my size, I'm dangerous.