[00:00.000 --> 00:05.120]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[00:05.120 --> 00:09.800]  Britain is at risk of a government deficit crisis worse than that of Greece, sparking
[00:09.800 --> 00:13.080]  fears over the economic stability of the country.
[00:13.080 --> 00:17.940]  The British pound fell last week when official figures revealed the government borrowed six
[00:17.940 --> 00:20.520]  billion dollars last month.
[00:20.520 --> 00:27.200]  Iran's police chief, General Ismail Moghadam, has accused the BBC of being an arm of MI6
[00:27.200 --> 00:31.720]  and warned the severe punishment of any Iranians contacting the broadcaster.
[00:31.720 --> 00:39.760]  Moghadam said, quote, the BBC is the arm of MI6 and Voice of America belongs to the CIA.
[00:39.760 --> 00:43.840]  In Iraq over the weekend, 10 Iraqis were killed and 20 wounded.
[00:43.840 --> 00:48.920]  Two US helicopter pilots were killed landing at a base in northern Iraq.
[00:48.920 --> 00:53.520]  Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki says his country will not sell the rights to any more
[00:53.520 --> 00:58.240]  of its oil fields to foreign companies.
[00:58.240 --> 01:03.880]  The chief author of the Bush administration's, quote, torture memo, John Yoo, told Justice
[01:03.880 --> 01:09.320]  Department investigators the president's war-making authority was so broad he had the constitutional
[01:09.320 --> 01:12.760]  power to order a village to be, quote, massacred.
[01:12.760 --> 01:17.400]  According to a new report Friday by the Office of Professional Responsibility, Yoo's views
[01:17.400 --> 01:22.360]  were deemed so out of step with legal precedent they prompted the Justice Department's internal
[01:22.360 --> 01:27.480]  watchdog to conclude he committed, quote, intentional professional misconduct.
[01:27.480 --> 01:31.360]  When he advised the CIA it could waterboard Al-Qaeda suspects.
[01:31.360 --> 01:36.600]  The OPR report concluded that Yoo, now a Berkeley law professor and his boss at the time, Jay
[01:36.600 --> 01:41.840]  Bybee, now a federal judge, should be referred to their state bar associations for possible
[01:41.840 --> 01:43.980]  disciplinary proceedings.
[01:43.980 --> 01:49.000]  At the core of the legal arguments were the views of Yoo, strongly backed by David Addington,
[01:49.000 --> 01:54.240]  Mike Cheney's legal counsel, that the president's wartime powers included the authority to override
[01:54.240 --> 02:00.600]  laws passed by Congress.
[02:00.600 --> 02:05.480]  The FBI and the Justice Department Friday officially closed their investigation into
[02:05.480 --> 02:11.520]  the 2001 mailings of anthrax-contaminated letters in New York and Florida concluding
[02:11.520 --> 02:17.640]  that U.S. Army medical researcher Bruce Ivins was responsible for the resulting five deaths.
[02:17.640 --> 02:23.720]  Ivins' lawyer Paul Kemp has ridiculed the government's findings.
[02:23.720 --> 02:29.680]  McClatchy News reports two field commanders warned General Stanley McChrystal repeatedly
[02:29.680 --> 02:34.280]  about a worthless Afghanistan outpost that was too costly to defend.
[02:34.280 --> 02:39.520]  The field commanders are now facing penalties after two high-level military investigations.
[02:39.520 --> 02:47.240]  The attack on combat outpost Keating brought the worst single U.S. combat loss of 2009.
[02:47.240 --> 02:52.720]  Officers shot four banks from California to Florida Friday, boosting to 20 the number
[02:52.720 --> 02:54.600]  of bank failures this year.
[02:54.600 --> 03:05.040]  Top of the hour news brought to you by INN World Report.
[03:05.040 --> 03:12.000]  You are listening to the Rule of Law Radio Network at ruleoflawradio.com, live free speech
[03:12.000 --> 03:19.000]  talk radio at its best.
[03:42.000 --> 03:52.440]  We got the one, death's the one, with a vision that is second to none.
[03:52.440 --> 04:00.720]  We got the one, yeah, death's the one, who's gonna do what they say can't be done.
[04:00.720 --> 04:15.480]  Now I'm down in Mount Denver, Medina, a true grassroots beat in Scandinavia.
[04:15.480 --> 04:26.440]  Out between my gates of Texas, the Republic and their work, the new sweetheart of the
[04:26.440 --> 04:27.440]  Lone Star State.
[04:27.440 --> 04:31.400]  I'm in the way, I'm in the way, I'm in the way.
[04:31.400 --> 04:33.800]  Not necessarily in that order.
[04:33.800 --> 04:38.320]  And tonight is Monday nights, which is Eddie Craig's night.
[04:38.320 --> 04:43.100]  So we are going to be going over some traffic issues tonight.
[04:43.100 --> 04:47.960]  And Eddie, you wanted to just go over some basics for folks who may just be tuning in.
[04:47.960 --> 04:48.960]  Yes I did.
[04:48.960 --> 04:51.960]  I know we've got a new listener or two out there tonight.
[04:51.960 --> 04:57.240]  I met a gentleman's father today who put me in touch with his son who said he'd be listening
[04:57.240 --> 05:04.600]  so this update is for him and for all those that may be joining us for the first time.
[05:04.600 --> 05:11.560]  Basic misconception is that you are required to have a driver's license in order to travel
[05:11.560 --> 05:13.240]  in your automobile.
[05:13.240 --> 05:15.440]  This is a fallacy.
[05:15.440 --> 05:21.520]  Another misconception is that you must relish control of your own property to the state
[05:21.520 --> 05:27.360]  by registering your private automobile as a motor vehicle, thus putting inspection stickers
[05:27.360 --> 05:31.480]  on it, license plates of the state and so on and so forth.
[05:31.480 --> 05:35.760]  This is also a fallacy.
[05:35.760 --> 05:40.600]  In all of this you will find that as you spend time with us and research the traffic laws
[05:40.600 --> 05:45.960]  with us on these Monday nights is that the key issues in Texas revolving around the right
[05:45.960 --> 05:53.320]  to travel versus being regulated as if we are in commerce all hinges on the driver's
[05:53.320 --> 05:54.920]  license.
[05:54.920 --> 06:00.560]  The driver's license in and of itself is the linchpin that holds the whole scheme together.
[06:00.560 --> 06:07.480]  Once we use the law to prove that the only type of license that exists in Texas is a
[06:07.480 --> 06:16.640]  form of commercial license, then by necessity all things related must have a commercial
[06:16.640 --> 06:18.440]  interest.
[06:18.440 --> 06:23.800]  You cannot be required to have a commercial license to operate a motor vehicle if the
[06:23.800 --> 06:30.520]  purpose of that motor vehicle can't be somehow attached to the purpose of operating in commerce.
[06:30.520 --> 06:34.440]  Otherwise, you would not need a commercial license to do so.
[06:34.440 --> 06:37.240]  Does that make sense, Randy?
[06:37.240 --> 06:44.080]  Makes sense to me, but then I heard this part before.
[06:44.080 --> 06:46.320]  Let's take hunting as an example.
[06:46.320 --> 06:50.120]  Do you need a hunting license if you're not hunting?
[06:50.120 --> 06:51.920]  No.
[06:51.920 --> 06:54.360]  Okay.
[06:54.360 --> 07:00.440]  If you're not operating in commerce, you don't need a commercial license.
[07:00.440 --> 07:04.320]  The simple way to show that this is the way it works and this is the fact of the way it
[07:04.320 --> 07:12.080]  is, if you go to Chapter 521.021, you see in the Texas Transportation Code where they
[07:12.080 --> 07:17.600]  say it is an offense for anyone to operate a motor vehicle upon the highways of this
[07:17.600 --> 07:22.640]  state without a license issued under this chapter.
[07:22.640 --> 07:29.120]  Well, that statement right there would cause them a problem, in my opinion, because that
[07:29.120 --> 07:35.800]  would mean that you can't operate under a license under 522 if that was to be taken
[07:35.800 --> 07:36.800]  verbatim.
[07:36.800 --> 07:38.800]  Now, wouldn't it?
[07:38.800 --> 07:44.400]  522.0 deals with the commercial driver's license, but 521.0 says that you have to have a license
[07:44.400 --> 07:46.880]  issued under this chapter.
[07:46.880 --> 07:52.760]  Well, there's only three things that are considered in the definition of a driver's license in
[07:52.760 --> 08:03.400]  Chapter 521.0, that is a temporary license, a learner's permit, and an occupational license.
[08:03.400 --> 08:06.400]  Now, let's look at those for a minute.
[08:06.400 --> 08:13.440]  Chapter 521.0 has an individual section that deals with each of these items.
[08:13.440 --> 08:16.040]  Let's start with the temporary license.
[08:16.040 --> 08:23.400]  It specifically states that a temporary license is issued to an out-of-state resident or an
[08:23.400 --> 08:31.360]  out-of-state applicant who is currently active duty military and serving outside the state.
[08:31.360 --> 08:37.080]  These are the types of folks that can apply for the temporary license.
[08:37.080 --> 08:42.760]  When the temporary license is issued, it is issued without a photograph.
[08:42.760 --> 08:49.720]  When those individuals come within Texas, the requirement is, is that within 45 days,
[08:49.720 --> 08:55.620]  they go down to the DPS depot, they get a picture taken, and the picture is then added
[08:55.620 --> 08:59.560]  to their license and the license is then reissued.
[08:59.560 --> 09:04.600]  So the first question that would raise is, one, when you made the application for the
[09:04.600 --> 09:10.360]  temporary license and you came in and had a picture added to the temporary license so
[09:10.360 --> 09:17.240]  that the license is no longer temporary, what kind of license does it become?
[09:17.240 --> 09:20.160]  It can't remain a temporary license.
[09:20.160 --> 09:26.840]  It will not, as we will show, meet the criteria of either of the other two types of licenses.
[09:26.840 --> 09:32.080]  So what kind of license does the temporary license become?
[09:32.080 --> 09:35.040]  Now let's go and look at the learner's permit.
[09:35.040 --> 09:40.800]  The learner's permit is issued to anyone under the age of 20 or any age, actually, that is
[09:40.800 --> 09:47.520]  learning to drive for the first time and that must have at least a 21-year-old licensed
[09:47.520 --> 09:54.720]  driver awake, conscious, sober, in the front seat with them at all times when they're operating
[09:54.720 --> 09:57.080]  a motor vehicle.
[09:57.080 --> 10:00.400]  But again, same question needs to be asked.
[10:00.400 --> 10:05.800]  Once the person with the learner's permit goes down and passes the written exam, then
[10:05.800 --> 10:09.560]  they go down and pass the driving exam.
[10:09.560 --> 10:15.840]  That temporary or that learner's permit then gets turned in and a new license with a photograph
[10:15.840 --> 10:18.280]  is issued in its place.
[10:18.280 --> 10:24.480]  What kind of license are you issued after the learner's permit is complete?
[10:24.480 --> 10:29.720]  It's not the temporary license because it's not going to meet the criteria for the temporary
[10:29.720 --> 10:30.720]  license.
[10:30.720 --> 10:33.880]  You're not an out-of-state resident or serving in the military out-of-state.
[10:33.880 --> 10:38.000]  So the license you get back can't be the temporary license.
[10:38.000 --> 10:39.840]  It can't be the learner's permit.
[10:39.840 --> 10:43.200]  That's what you just turned in to get the license.
[10:43.200 --> 10:48.000]  So the only one this leaves us to deal with is the occupational license.
[10:48.000 --> 10:55.680]  In the occupational license, it specifically states that this license is issued only by
[10:55.680 --> 11:02.540]  a judge upon petition to a court because you had to surrender your original license because
[11:02.540 --> 11:08.160]  of either a DUI conviction or an ALR review hearing that took it away from you through
[11:08.160 --> 11:11.120]  an administrative procedure.
[11:11.120 --> 11:19.180]  Now if that's the case, you can't get this license from a DPS depot unless you're carrying
[11:19.180 --> 11:22.640]  a court order in your hand.
[11:22.640 --> 11:28.780]  So most people that I'm aware of don't go down to the license depot with a court order
[11:28.780 --> 11:31.980]  in their hand to get a driver's license.
[11:31.980 --> 11:35.920]  So the occupational license is out of the picture.
[11:35.920 --> 11:42.740]  But again the question becomes, what license did you have to surrender in order for you
[11:42.740 --> 11:47.120]  to be issued this occupational license?
[11:47.120 --> 11:51.520]  Now there are not but two chapters in the entire transportation code that deal with
[11:51.520 --> 11:57.560]  the issuing of licenses for the purposes of operating a motor vehicle.
[11:57.560 --> 12:04.480]  They are chapter 521 which deals with the quote unquote driver's license of which all
[12:04.480 --> 12:10.760]  three of these things we just discussed, you can only have one of and they're the only
[12:10.760 --> 12:15.200]  things that can be in the definition of driver's license.
[12:15.200 --> 12:21.400]  And then you have chapter 522 which is the commercial driver's license.
[12:21.400 --> 12:26.760]  Now since these are the only two chapters and since these are the only types of licenses
[12:26.760 --> 12:34.680]  mentioned in law, the only possible answer to what kind of license did it become or what
[12:34.680 --> 12:41.360]  kind of license did you surrender is a commercial driver's license.
[12:41.360 --> 12:46.400]  When you get the temporary license turned in and they reissue, the license they issue
[12:46.400 --> 12:54.320]  you cannot come from under chapter 521 because the three types that 521 deals with are not
[12:54.320 --> 12:55.800]  the kind you get back.
[12:55.800 --> 12:57.680]  We just covered that.
[12:57.680 --> 13:05.160]  So the only remaining place that the license could be issued is 522.
[13:05.160 --> 13:10.320]  Same thing with the learner's permit and the same thing with having to surrender your original
[13:10.320 --> 13:12.880]  license to get the occupational license.
[13:12.880 --> 13:18.800]  The only license you could have surrendered is a commercial driver's license.
[13:18.800 --> 13:23.480]  Now most people out there are fully aware that the license they have in their wallet
[13:23.480 --> 13:28.960]  does not have CDL, commercial driver's license written on it.
[13:28.960 --> 13:30.520]  That's okay.
[13:30.520 --> 13:37.080]  If you look at the chart of motor vehicles that can be operated with a CDL and the other
[13:37.080 --> 13:43.680]  form of the CDL, you will see that this list of vehicles is exactly the same.
[13:43.680 --> 13:49.040]  The only difference between the license that is actually marked commercial and the one
[13:49.040 --> 13:56.240]  that isn't is that in 522 the commercial driver's license is the only one that is authorized
[13:56.240 --> 14:02.640]  to operate a motor vehicle that has a hazardous materials placard on it.
[14:02.640 --> 14:07.080]  That is the only difference.
[14:07.080 --> 14:13.900]  Through that process of elimination and simple straightforward logic, it would be otherwise
[14:13.900 --> 14:20.240]  impossible to argue that there's any other kind of license in Texas law.
[14:20.240 --> 14:27.640]  Now since you have to have a valid Texas driver's license in order to do any of these other
[14:27.640 --> 14:35.720]  things, you can't get insurance on a motor vehicle in Texas to cover you traveling in
[14:35.720 --> 14:41.240]  it if you don't have a driver's license.
[14:41.240 --> 14:47.880]  You can't use a motor vehicle on the road unless it's registered.
[14:47.880 --> 14:52.200]  You can't get it registered if you don't have insurance.
[14:52.200 --> 14:59.960]  Let's also not forget the fact that chapter 501 transportation code 501.004 specifically
[14:59.960 --> 15:06.000]  states that you are required or only that state-owned and political subdivision-owned
[15:06.000 --> 15:12.940]  vehicles must have a certificate of title and if you check vehicle registration in 502,
[15:12.940 --> 15:18.960]  you will see you cannot register that vehicle without a certificate of title.
[15:18.960 --> 15:25.440]  And 501.004 says the certificate of title applies only to state-owned and political
[15:25.440 --> 15:28.880]  subdivision-owned motor vehicles.
[15:28.880 --> 15:30.800]  Doesn't apply to us.
[15:30.800 --> 15:36.520]  By that standard, it doesn't apply to any motor vehicle owned by a company.
[15:36.520 --> 15:41.380]  It applies strictly to those owned by the state.
[15:41.380 --> 15:48.280]  So given that, that would lead you to believe that only a state vehicle by definition and
[15:48.280 --> 15:55.200]  by statute would be the only one that could be registered in the state.
[15:55.200 --> 15:59.760]  Because you must have the certificate of title and yet the certificate of title specifically
[15:59.760 --> 16:05.720]  states it applies to only one kind and that's those owned by government.
[16:05.720 --> 16:12.920]  Now, the key factors to remember in all this is that one, we the people did not give the
[16:12.920 --> 16:16.880]  legislature the authority to regulate us.
[16:16.880 --> 16:24.160]  We gave them specific power and authority to regulate persons known as legal entities.
[16:24.160 --> 16:27.960]  The people are not legal entities.
[16:27.960 --> 16:30.320]  We are living flesh and blood.
[16:30.320 --> 16:32.640]  We are the superior political power holder.
[16:32.640 --> 16:37.520]  If you don't believe that, check the Texas Constitution.
[16:37.520 --> 16:40.800]  All right.
[16:40.800 --> 16:45.600]  We'll be right back.
[16:45.600 --> 16:48.520]  And we've got a caller on the line, would you like to take a call?
[16:48.520 --> 16:49.520]  Yes, ma'am.
[16:49.520 --> 16:50.520]  Okay, great.
[16:50.520 --> 17:01.480]  This is the rule of law.
[17:01.480 --> 17:04.960]  You feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[17:04.960 --> 17:05.960]  Sorry.
[17:05.960 --> 17:08.880]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[17:08.880 --> 17:09.880]  What?
[17:09.880 --> 17:13.720]  If so, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[17:13.720 --> 17:19.160]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt and like millions of other Americans, I was diagnosed with stupidity
[17:19.160 --> 17:20.360]  at an early age.
[17:20.360 --> 17:24.360]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home
[17:24.360 --> 17:26.440]  in America, the television.
[17:26.440 --> 17:31.480]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity, but there is hope.
[17:31.480 --> 17:35.240]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering
[17:35.240 --> 17:37.560]  from sports zombieism recover.
[17:37.560 --> 17:41.760]  And because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries
[17:41.760 --> 17:43.840]  without feeling tired or uninterested.
[17:43.840 --> 17:51.800]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity, then you need to call 512-480-2503
[17:51.800 --> 17:55.880]  or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[17:55.880 --> 17:59.240]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary
[17:59.240 --> 18:12.760]  and an overall increase in mental functioning.
[18:12.760 --> 18:30.900]  The
[18:30.900 --> 18:34.900]  They have no answer, also can't sleep inside.
[18:34.900 --> 18:38.900]  They don't know his prophecy, Lord, how the war will come, take it easy.
[18:38.900 --> 18:43.900]  They don't know the way to political end, then getting mad and angry.
[18:43.900 --> 18:48.900]  But they must stand up and fight and fight for the freedom and be free.
[18:48.900 --> 18:54.900]  When they like them, love slavery and get hanged out from the government's hand again.
[18:54.900 --> 19:04.900]  The idiots, the Christians, they don't have the answer.
[19:04.900 --> 19:14.900]  The idiots, the Christians, and they don't have the answer.
[19:14.900 --> 19:24.900]  They don't hear me, they don't hear you, they don't hear me, Lord, they don't hear the country.
[19:24.900 --> 19:29.900]  They don't hear of the constitution, they don't repeat the treaty, they don't give a damn about it.
[19:29.900 --> 19:34.900]  You don't see how this country, how they lead we, they lead we, you see.
[19:34.900 --> 19:36.900]  Like we blind and we crazy.
[19:36.900 --> 19:44.900]  Okay, we are back. We're taking your calls, 512-646-1984.
[19:44.900 --> 19:47.900]  And we've got Ken from Texas.
[19:47.900 --> 19:50.900]  Ken, thanks for calling in. What's on your mind tonight?
[19:50.900 --> 19:55.900]  Well, I'm still trying to pick myself up off the floor.
[19:55.900 --> 19:58.900]  Okay, hold on, Ken. You've got a real bad connection.
[19:58.900 --> 20:01.900]  Can you please call back in?
[20:01.900 --> 20:06.900]  We can, yeah, please call back in. We can hardly understand anything you're saying.
[20:06.900 --> 20:09.900]  All right, thanks.
[20:09.900 --> 20:15.900]  Okay. All right, Eddie, please continue. This is good stuff.
[20:15.900 --> 20:24.900]  All right. Now, the plates that I have on my car that the gentleman noticed, as I said before, they're handmade plates.
[20:24.900 --> 20:39.900]  They say nothing more on them than the Republic of Texas, the sovereign nation, and private vehicle in vinyl letters that have been put on there and clear coated so they'll stay on the plate.
[20:39.900 --> 20:41.900]  That's all that's on the front and back.
[20:41.900 --> 20:48.900]  There are no state stickers or anything like that on the windshield of my car, no inspection, nothing of that sort.
[20:48.900 --> 20:54.900]  And the reason for that is, is because I do not operate a motor vehicle.
[20:54.900 --> 21:02.900]  I travel in my private conveyance, which in fundamental terms is known as the right to travel.
[21:02.900 --> 21:18.900]  The courts have ruled for many, many decades now, over and over and over again at virtually every level in virtually every state, that the right to travel and the right to liberty are synonymous.
[21:18.900 --> 21:29.900]  You cannot call people free and then restrict them in their ability to provide their own locomotion at their own place and time.
[21:29.900 --> 21:37.900]  You can't tell somebody they're free to go wherever they want and then say, but only if you do it the way we want to let you do it.
[21:37.900 --> 21:40.900]  That's not free.
[21:40.900 --> 21:46.900]  We never granted anybody the authority to regulate us.
[21:46.900 --> 21:58.900]  Yes, they can regulate the use of the roads for the purpose of business, but the people's business is not a business of gain, meaning commercial in nature.
[21:58.900 --> 22:13.900]  So the people's business is not subject to regulation, and our right to travel from place to place on our own timetable and by our own methods is entirely within our right of liberty.
[22:13.900 --> 22:22.900]  Now, by that same token, lots of people out there love to scream and argue, but if we didn't have rules and regulations, people would just go nuts and kill each other.
[22:22.900 --> 22:29.900]  Well, I don't really see that we wiped each other out before we got to the point of having these things.
[22:29.900 --> 22:36.900]  Everybody has always wanted to say if we don't control this, we don't control that, then it'll just be chaos.
[22:36.900 --> 22:39.900]  The problem is it hasn't been chaos.
[22:39.900 --> 22:41.900]  These laws didn't exist through history.
[22:41.900 --> 22:43.900]  They're recent.
[22:43.900 --> 22:55.900]  There have been other forms of laws, but none nearly so restrictive and oppressive and numerous as the ones we have to wade through today.
[22:55.900 --> 22:57.900]  Why?
[22:57.900 --> 22:59.900]  I can give you a good idea.
[22:59.900 --> 23:07.900]  If you notice, most of these laws that they want you to obey have a fee attached to them.
[23:07.900 --> 23:17.900]  Do this, get this license or this permit, and then you can do this right along with that, and we won't say anything more to you about it.
[23:17.900 --> 23:18.900]  Just give us money.
[23:18.900 --> 23:21.900]  We'll be quiet.
[23:21.900 --> 23:25.900]  That's the reason for such large growth and regulation and everything else.
[23:25.900 --> 23:34.900]  It's a way to find a way to say that you're doing something they don't like so they can charge you a fee for it.
[23:34.900 --> 23:40.900]  And a little over 11 years ago, I got sick of that situation.
[23:40.900 --> 23:49.900]  So I made it my duty to study everything I could about the Texas traffic law and several other species of law.
[23:49.900 --> 23:55.900]  I just happened to get pretty good at this one.
[23:55.900 --> 24:00.900]  We gave a traffic law seminar on October 24th and 25th, wasn't it, Deborah?
[24:00.900 --> 24:02.900]  Yes, that's correct.
[24:02.900 --> 24:07.900]  October 24th and 25th there in Austin, Texas.
[24:07.900 --> 24:12.900]  So far, we've heard lots of good, positive information from the people that were there.
[24:12.900 --> 24:13.900]  They're using the information.
[24:13.900 --> 24:19.900]  Even people from out of state came to this, and they have bought the seminar material.
[24:19.900 --> 24:28.900]  They're using the information and the research that I've put together for Texas to figure out how to research and put together the laws in their own state.
[24:28.900 --> 24:38.900]  They are working diligently to find out how their state has stolen an essential substantive right of the people from them like I've managed to do here.
[24:38.900 --> 24:48.900]  And now I've made it my purpose to educate everybody on it that wants to know exactly why what's going on is wrong.
[24:48.900 --> 24:53.900]  It's one of the things that has made me decide to run for sheriff here in Nacogdoches County
[24:53.900 --> 25:02.900]  because I'm sick and tired of watching the status quo land on the backs of the people and it's not their burden to bear.
[25:02.900 --> 25:11.900]  So all that being said, if there's anybody out there listening that's got anything to comment over anything that they've learned from the traffic seminar
[25:11.900 --> 25:18.900]  or any of the events they've had going on lately, please give us a call and let's get you on the air and talk about it.
[25:18.900 --> 25:30.900]  Now, that motion that I was reading on one of the last shows here, last couple shows, I've got the initial public intoxication version of that completed now.
[25:30.900 --> 25:40.900]  I am now transitioning it over to the traffic version, which 90 percent of the arguments are identical because of the process involved.
[25:40.900 --> 25:49.900]  They are identical since the charges more or less for the grade Class C misdemeanor are identical.
[25:49.900 --> 25:52.900]  So since that's the case, most everything will work the same.
[25:52.900 --> 26:01.900]  The only difference is we have the portion in the transportation code that differs slightly from the code of criminal procedure
[26:01.900 --> 26:08.900]  in the length of time or the availability of a magistrate and how the officer is required to behave in that regard.
[26:08.900 --> 26:18.900]  In the case of something that's listed in the penal code, the officer is supposed to be operating under Chapter 14 and Chapter 15
[26:18.900 --> 26:22.900]  of the code of criminal procedure for what he is supposed to do.
[26:22.900 --> 26:30.900]  14.06B specifically states that in the case of an offense, Class C misdemeanor punishable by fine only,
[26:30.900 --> 26:36.900]  that the officer writes a citation and sends the person on their way, blah, blah, blah.
[26:36.900 --> 26:51.900]  And if they don't, then 14.06 Subsection A says that they are to take the person before a magistrate without unnecessary delay.
[26:51.900 --> 26:58.900]  But after that, it says, but not later than 48 hours.
[26:58.900 --> 27:07.900]  The problem we've got right now is that most every police officer has taken that but not later than 48 hours
[27:07.900 --> 27:16.900]  as a blanket method of allowing them to take you before a magistrate at their convenience or at the magistrate's convenience.
[27:16.900 --> 27:21.900]  That is not the purpose and intent of that statute.
[27:21.900 --> 27:29.900]  The purpose and intent of that statute is to give them 48 hours to exhaust all possibilities of getting you before a magistrate,
[27:29.900 --> 27:32.900]  which it covers in great detail.
[27:32.900 --> 27:38.900]  If you can't find the local magistrate, you take them to some magistrate somewhere else in the county,
[27:38.900 --> 27:42.900]  and you're required to find every one of them.
[27:42.900 --> 27:51.900]  If you can't find the local or one within the county, you are commanded to find one in any of the surrounding counties.
[27:51.900 --> 27:55.900]  If it takes you 48 hours to do that, so be it.
[27:55.900 --> 28:03.900]  But when 48 hours has expired and you haven't found the magistrate, you're required to turn them loose.
[28:03.900 --> 28:12.900]  Now, the only exception that that 48-hour rule would cover is if there is some form of state of emergency
[28:12.900 --> 28:20.900]  that would otherwise prevent the officer from being able to fulfill the duty of delivering you before a magistrate.
[28:20.900 --> 28:30.900]  Then that 48-hour period is coverage for the officer so he cannot be held liable for having to hold you that long.
[28:30.900 --> 28:40.900]  But when that officer does not act with due diligence to deliver you within that 48-hour period, that officer is guilty of a crime.
[28:40.900 --> 28:49.900]  He is guilty of a crime because nowhere in Texas law is there authority placed upon the hands and head of a police officer
[28:49.900 --> 28:56.900]  or his department to commit anybody to jail.
[28:56.900 --> 29:04.900]  That is reserved strictly to a magistrate who must issue a commitment order.
[29:04.900 --> 29:10.900]  Now, who can he issue the commitment order to? That's another big deal.
[29:10.900 --> 29:15.900]  According to law, he can only issue it to the sheriff.
[29:15.900 --> 29:26.900]  And the sheriff is then commanded to take the person into custody and keep them safely in his jail.
[29:26.900 --> 29:36.900]  There is nowhere in the law that I can find that allows a judge to remand you to a municipal jail.
[29:36.900 --> 29:38.900]  Nowhere.
[29:38.900 --> 29:42.900]  All right. Thanks, Eddie.
[29:42.900 --> 29:45.900]  All right. When we get back, it looks like we've got more callers on the line.
[29:45.900 --> 29:48.900]  Ken called back in, but then he dropped off.
[29:48.900 --> 29:51.900]  We've got Randy from Texas, Marty from Idaho.
[29:51.900 --> 29:59.900]  We'll be taking your calls on the other side. We'll be right back.
[29:59.900 --> 30:04.900]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[30:04.900 --> 30:08.900]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[30:08.900 --> 30:14.900]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[30:14.900 --> 30:20.900]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[30:20.900 --> 30:24.900]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[30:24.900 --> 30:26.900]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[30:26.900 --> 30:28.900]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[30:28.900 --> 30:33.900]  How to turn the financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[30:33.900 --> 30:38.900]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[30:38.900 --> 30:40.900]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[30:40.900 --> 30:48.900]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner, or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[30:48.900 --> 31:03.900]  That's ruleoflawradio.com, or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[31:03.900 --> 31:18.900]  Yeah, I got a warrant, and I'm going to solve them to the help of government them, prosecute them. Okay.
[31:18.900 --> 31:41.900]  Okay, we are back. We're going to your call.
[31:41.900 --> 31:46.900]  We've got Marty from Idaho, and Ken, if you'd like to call back in, please feel free.
[31:46.900 --> 31:51.900]  All right. Thanks, Marty. What do you have on your mind tonight? What's your question, comment?
[31:51.900 --> 31:55.900]  My question is, I think he kind of answered it while I was waiting.
[31:55.900 --> 32:01.900]  I'm not in Texas, and obviously you know you go all over the country, so what's the best?
[32:01.900 --> 32:06.900]  And then I think he was saying that he's teaching people, so it must be on your website to find out how to do this in your own state.
[32:06.900 --> 32:12.900]  Am I correct on that? To check on the driver's license deal and the registration?
[32:12.900 --> 32:23.900]  Well, what they're doing is I've got a seminar book that we sell with the seminar material that goes through the Texas law step-by-step for each of these things,
[32:23.900 --> 32:26.900]  registration, driver's license, insurance, all of that.
[32:26.900 --> 32:34.900]  It breaks the law down into individual bits, pieces, and definitions and shows that the law was never meant to apply to the people themselves.
[32:34.900 --> 32:42.900]  And then they go back and use that information to find that same correlation in their own statute within their state.
[32:42.900 --> 32:46.900]  And it's okay for, I mean, we regular people can do that?
[32:46.900 --> 32:51.900]  I'm regular people. I manage to do it.
[32:51.900 --> 32:55.900]  Okay. So you get this on your website, right?
[32:55.900 --> 32:58.900]  Yes, ma'am. You can order it from the website, most certainly.
[32:58.900 --> 32:59.900]  Okay.
[32:59.900 --> 33:04.900]  Now, do be aware it's a fairly large download because it's not only the seminar materials,
[33:04.900 --> 33:08.900]  but it's got years and years' worth of research material in it, too.
[33:08.900 --> 33:11.900]  Case law, you name it, it's in there.
[33:11.900 --> 33:14.900]  Oh, it's not just about the subject you're speaking of tonight?
[33:14.900 --> 33:21.900]  Well, it's almost all about traffic of some type in various states, court rulings.
[33:21.900 --> 33:25.900]  I mean, I've put everything, including paperwork, to file in court.
[33:25.900 --> 33:33.900]  Deborah and Randy and I have all contributed to that area as far as how to take it to court and fight it.
[33:33.900 --> 33:41.900]  Well, I mean, I don't really have anything to fight except that when my license comes up for renewal, do I want to go ahead and do it?
[33:41.900 --> 33:46.900]  It's like going along with the way it's been going. It's not really the right thing to do.
[33:46.900 --> 33:48.900]  You should really fight it, I guess, right?
[33:48.900 --> 33:53.900]  If you believe that you're being taken advantage of, then I would have to say yes.
[33:53.900 --> 33:54.900]  Sure.
[33:54.900 --> 33:57.900]  But that's a decision people can only make for themselves.
[33:57.900 --> 33:58.900]  Oh, absolutely.
[33:58.900 --> 33:59.900]  I can't make that for them.
[33:59.900 --> 34:00.900]  Yeah, I agree.
[34:00.900 --> 34:06.900]  I don't know how you got my number and that you had me, because I've been trying to call you,
[34:06.900 --> 34:11.900]  and all I could get was your radio station, so I don't know how you got my name in Idaho.
[34:11.900 --> 34:15.900]  Well, you are calling Rule of Law Radio Network.
[34:15.900 --> 34:18.900]  But I didn't get to speak to, like, the operator to take my name.
[34:18.900 --> 34:21.900]  That's because I don't have a call screener right now,
[34:21.900 --> 34:26.900]  and if you've called into the network before and someone has entered in your name
[34:26.900 --> 34:30.900]  and your state into the database, then that's what comes up.
[34:30.900 --> 34:32.900]  Okay, so this is good to know.
[34:32.900 --> 34:34.900]  Thanks, Deborah. Appreciate it.
[34:34.900 --> 34:35.900]  Okay, great.
[34:35.900 --> 34:39.900]  Okay, bye.
[34:39.900 --> 34:45.900]  Okay, we are going to go now to Randy in Texas.
[34:45.900 --> 34:49.900]  All right, Randy, what's on your mind tonight?
[34:49.900 --> 34:57.900]  I wanted to ask Eddie about, I've got a traffic citation from Oklahoma,
[34:57.900 --> 35:03.900]  and I went ahead and filed a demur back on the 6th of February,
[35:03.900 --> 35:11.900]  and I received today a notice of failure to comply with the terms of the citation.
[35:11.900 --> 35:14.900]  They're basically trying to say I failed to appear,
[35:14.900 --> 35:20.900]  you know, I did put my paperwork in on plenty of time.
[35:20.900 --> 35:26.900]  And I'm thinking, I'm wondering what I should do next.
[35:26.900 --> 35:28.900]  I mean, I've got several options here,
[35:28.900 --> 35:32.900]  but I'm trying to figure out should I go do everything at once
[35:32.900 --> 35:36.900]  and just, you know, do everything I can toward them,
[35:36.900 --> 35:41.900]  which would include, like, a tort letter for a federal suit,
[35:41.900 --> 35:44.900]  bar grievance against judge and prosecutor,
[35:44.900 --> 35:47.900]  judicial complaint against the judge,
[35:47.900 --> 35:49.900]  go after the judge.
[35:49.900 --> 35:51.900]  I believe the judge has a private practice.
[35:51.900 --> 35:55.900]  Go ahead and file bar grievances to the point that he's out of practice.
[35:55.900 --> 35:58.900]  Go after their oath of office, liquidate their bonds,
[35:58.900 --> 36:04.900]  and then do a writ of mandamus to the higher court,
[36:04.900 --> 36:06.900]  and do all that, or should I do it?
[36:06.900 --> 36:08.900]  And the last thing is,
[36:08.900 --> 36:11.900]  do you think I could get away with going to the postal service
[36:11.900 --> 36:18.900]  and sticking the postal inspectors on them for mail fraud?
[36:18.900 --> 36:20.900]  Well, not unless you've got something that can prove it.
[36:20.900 --> 36:23.900]  However, one thing I'd highly recommend you do,
[36:23.900 --> 36:27.900]  considering that you are an out-of-stater,
[36:27.900 --> 36:29.900]  go to the online statutes for Oklahoma
[36:29.900 --> 36:34.900]  and see what the specific requirements for serving notice to an out-of-stater is
[36:34.900 --> 36:36.900]  and see if they comply.
[36:36.900 --> 36:38.900]  That would be the first thing.
[36:38.900 --> 36:42.900]  Here in Texas, there's a different requirement that must be followed
[36:42.900 --> 36:48.900]  to serve someone who is out of the state versus someone that is in it.
[36:48.900 --> 36:54.900]  So find out how they were required to notice you since you're out of state.
[36:54.900 --> 36:57.900]  See if they did that.
[36:57.900 --> 36:59.900]  Again, just like you would here in Texas,
[36:59.900 --> 37:06.900]  go through their procedure and see what procedure were they supposed to do and did not do.
[37:06.900 --> 37:11.900]  Well, unfortunately, I've gone through the, looked at the, I mean, you know,
[37:11.900 --> 37:19.900]  compared to here in Texas, their stuff is really kind of weak, their statutes.
[37:19.900 --> 37:22.900]  I mean, there's a lot of gaps in them.
[37:22.900 --> 37:26.900]  And I haven't found anything like that looking through it.
[37:26.900 --> 37:32.900]  And I was hoping there might be somebody on the call tonight that would be able to call in
[37:32.900 --> 37:35.900]  and knows the Oklahoma statutes better than I do
[37:35.900 --> 37:40.900]  because I'm trying to, you know, match them up to what we have.
[37:40.900 --> 37:42.900]  And it's been really hard because there's a lot.
[37:42.900 --> 37:47.900]  I mean, I was looking for the, like, in the penal code there
[37:47.900 --> 37:49.900]  for something like official oppression and all that,
[37:49.900 --> 37:54.900]  and it's just not there that I can find, at least not in the online stuff.
[37:54.900 --> 37:59.900]  And I'm assuming that it's a full version of it, but maybe they didn't.
[37:59.900 --> 38:01.900]  Well, don't necessarily make that assumption.
[38:01.900 --> 38:05.900]  Arkansas makes it very clear that nothing online can be relied upon.
[38:05.900 --> 38:11.900]  The only manuals or quotations they'll accept are directly out of their own printed books in Arkansas.
[38:11.900 --> 38:15.900]  And the stuff they put online, they tell you right up front,
[38:15.900 --> 38:19.900]  we don't care if it's online or not, how accurate it is or isn't, we don't care.
[38:19.900 --> 38:23.900]  We only accept information out of the books.
[38:23.900 --> 38:27.900]  So where could I get it being here in Austin?
[38:27.900 --> 38:31.900]  I mean, could I get it down at the law libraries down at UT?
[38:31.900 --> 38:33.900]  You could find case law, I'm sure.
[38:33.900 --> 38:35.900]  I don't know about the rest of it.
[38:35.900 --> 38:45.900]  You might call a junior college in Oklahoma that has a criminal justice program.
[38:45.900 --> 38:46.900]  Okay.
[38:46.900 --> 38:51.900]  They will almost certainly have a concise version for their students.
[38:51.900 --> 38:57.900]  I know here in Texas, every junior college has a criminal justice program,
[38:57.900 --> 39:03.900]  and they've got a little book for about eight bucks that has penal code,
[39:03.900 --> 39:09.900]  code of current procedure, rules of civil procedure, I think.
[39:09.900 --> 39:14.900]  Not rules of civil procedure, family code, property code, transportation code.
[39:14.900 --> 39:17.900]  It's all in one little volume.
[39:17.900 --> 39:23.900]  They've probably got that in Oklahoma for their wannabe cops.
[39:23.900 --> 39:25.900]  Gotcha.
[39:25.900 --> 39:31.900]  That's a good idea because I just don't, you know, I'm not trusting what's online,
[39:31.900 --> 39:34.900]  but it's all I got for now.
[39:34.900 --> 39:37.900]  Now, what about going after everything at one whole hog,
[39:37.900 --> 39:41.900]  or should I kind of graduate myself at them?
[39:41.900 --> 39:46.900]  Well, that part would kind of be up to you.
[39:46.900 --> 39:52.900]  It kind of goes to how the strategy works.
[39:52.900 --> 39:54.900]  Me, I like to just clobber them.
[39:54.900 --> 39:57.900]  Now, did they deny all of your motions up front, Randy?
[39:57.900 --> 39:59.900]  No.
[39:59.900 --> 40:05.900]  According to their code of criminal procedure,
[40:05.900 --> 40:10.900]  if I raise an issue about subject matter jurisdiction or jurisdiction,
[40:10.900 --> 40:19.900]  they're supposed to immediately go and give me a date for hearing.
[40:19.900 --> 40:21.900]  They didn't do any of that.
[40:21.900 --> 40:23.900]  I mean, I didn't get anything until I got this back.
[40:23.900 --> 40:24.900]  Okay.
[40:24.900 --> 40:28.900]  Well, then you have, then you've already got them on procedure.
[40:28.900 --> 40:32.900]  Now you can argue that they have not followed their own procedure.
[40:32.900 --> 40:37.900]  If they were required to immediately schedule you for a hearing to settle subject matter jurisdiction,
[40:37.900 --> 40:41.900]  which you've been waiting on to hear about, and they've moved the trial without it,
[40:41.900 --> 40:45.900]  that's a violation of their procedure.
[40:45.900 --> 40:46.900]  Right.
[40:46.900 --> 40:53.900]  Well, I mean, my argument was, hey, look, we didn't even have an examining trial or any type of a probable cause hearing,
[40:53.900 --> 40:57.900]  which would be your next step, even if I was to show up.
[40:57.900 --> 41:03.900]  Now, have you checked the Oklahoma statutes to see if they do that?
[41:03.900 --> 41:17.900]  Yeah, again, it's not super, super clear, but in the sense of if you're arrested, they have to take you to that hearing.
[41:17.900 --> 41:18.900]  Okay.
[41:18.900 --> 41:25.900]  I'm assuming if I have a ticket, how do I skip that step?
[41:25.900 --> 41:33.900]  Well, it would seem, according to the legal black hole we've found between the transportation code and the criminal code,
[41:33.900 --> 41:42.900]  that it is entirely possible that the Oklahoma legislatures have done what the Texas legislature has done,
[41:42.900 --> 41:49.900]  and that is try to formulate a method of accusing the people of a criminal act
[41:49.900 --> 41:58.900]  by providing no legal method of remedy by giving them the opportunity to have an examining trial like they do in any other criminal case.
[41:58.900 --> 42:09.900]  That's the only way I can see how there is a complete lack of unity between the mandates of what is supposed to happen
[42:09.900 --> 42:15.900]  after arrest in the transportation code and what actually happens in the code of criminal procedure,
[42:15.900 --> 42:26.900]  because the code of criminal procedure says in 1406 and 1517 that its application is to all things enumerated in this code,
[42:26.900 --> 42:29.900]  meaning the code of criminal procedure.
[42:29.900 --> 42:35.900]  Well, nowhere in that code does it enumerate an offense of the transportation code.
[42:35.900 --> 42:40.900]  It says who has jurisdiction over certain offenses under the transportation code,
[42:40.900 --> 42:52.900]  but nowhere does it say how any citation issued in relation to a transportation code offense is to be handled in the procedure.
[42:52.900 --> 42:57.900]  It specifically says a citation issued in accordance with 14.06.
[42:57.900 --> 43:07.900]  Well, are they issuing you a transportation code citation under 1406 or under provision of the transportation code?
[43:07.900 --> 43:14.900]  If they're issuing it under the transportation code, the 1406 provisions do not apply.
[43:14.900 --> 43:17.900]  So what is the procedure?
[43:17.900 --> 43:22.900]  So all those accused of a transportation code offense fall between the cracks.
[43:22.900 --> 43:27.900]  We can't get a due process hearing, a probable cause hearing.
[43:27.900 --> 43:32.900]  We can't get an arraignment because, now this is the part I like, and think about this.
[43:32.900 --> 43:45.900]  We'll cover this when we get back, but this is an interesting aspect of how this is working according to statute.
[43:45.900 --> 43:47.900]  All right, we'll be right back, Randy.
[43:47.900 --> 43:49.900]  Hang on the line.
[43:49.900 --> 43:59.900]  Callers, if you'd like to call in, 512-646-1984.
[43:59.900 --> 44:08.900]  Attention, an important product from hempusa.org, microplant powder, will change your life by removing all types of positive toxins,
[44:08.900 --> 44:15.900]  such as heavy metals, parasites, bacteria, viruses, and fungus from the digestive tract and stomach wall so you can absorb nutrients.
[44:15.900 --> 44:24.900]  Microplant powder is 89% silica and packed with a negative charge that attracts positive toxins from the blood, organ, spine, and brain.
[44:24.900 --> 44:30.900]  This product has the ability to rebuild cartilage and bone, which allows synovial fluid to return to the joints.
[44:30.900 --> 44:36.900]  Silica is a precursor to calcium, meaning the body turns silica into calcium and is great for the heart.
[44:36.900 --> 44:42.900]  There is no better time than now to have microplant powder on your shelf or in your storage shelter.
[44:42.900 --> 44:45.900]  And with an unlimited shelf life, you can store it anywhere.
[44:45.900 --> 44:50.900]  Call 908-691-2608 or visit hempusa.org.
[44:50.900 --> 44:59.900]  It's a great way to change your life, so call 908-691-2608 or visit us at hempusa.org today.
[45:20.900 --> 45:42.900]  Okay, we are back.
[45:42.900 --> 45:51.900]  We're speaking with Randy in Texas, and callers, if you'd like to call in, 512-646-1984.
[45:51.900 --> 45:52.900]  Go ahead, Randy.
[45:52.900 --> 46:06.900]  I also wanted to ask you, Eddie, do you have kind of a skeleton for a fed suit for traffic in the violations of the federal civil rights and stuff?
[46:06.900 --> 46:08.900]  Not for the fed suit.
[46:08.900 --> 46:10.900]  I think I've got enough on this motion.
[46:10.900 --> 46:15.900]  I've just finished this motion once Randy goes over it with me, and we look at it.
[46:15.900 --> 46:21.900]  I think the arguments that I've made as counterallegations in this motion would go very well in a suit here in the state.
[46:21.900 --> 46:29.900]  They would also go well in a federal suit secondary, but I'd rather go after them in the state first, so I know.
[46:29.900 --> 46:34.900]  Well, yeah, I'm going to go fed because they're in Oklahoma, which actually works to my advantage,
[46:34.900 --> 46:45.900]  because I mean I don't think they really want to come down here to Austin, Texas and face a jury and go through all the BS that we can put them through if I can do it.
[46:45.900 --> 46:50.900]  No, they probably wouldn't, but you've got to get them to that point first.
[46:50.900 --> 46:56.900]  Right, and so what I'm trying to do is put together something that says, look, I'm going to, you know, here's my tort letter.
[46:56.900 --> 47:00.900]  I'm going to see you in federal court, and this is what I'm going to go after you for.
[47:00.900 --> 47:11.900]  Right. Now, you can go after them if you can show, which it seems like you can, that they've acted in violation of their statutes and thus acted in detriment to your rights.
[47:11.900 --> 47:12.900]  Right.
[47:12.900 --> 47:14.900]  So if you do that, that shouldn't be a problem.
[47:14.900 --> 47:27.900]  Now, there's that guy that's up in Washington State that's done that RICO suit that he's filed with the federal government and attached several states to it, and they pretty much leave him alone now.
[47:27.900 --> 47:30.900]  Do you have a copy of that?
[47:30.900 --> 47:31.900]  I do somewhere.
[47:31.900 --> 47:33.900]  I'll have to look it up and get it to you.
[47:33.900 --> 47:39.900]  It's a fairly thick, it's 60, 70 pages worth of RICO.
[47:39.900 --> 47:45.900]  Well, I'm looking at kind of what Charlie Sprinkle did out in California in the 70s against Reagan and his wife.
[47:45.900 --> 47:49.900]  Right, and that's exactly what I'm hoping to do here.
[47:49.900 --> 47:55.900]  But remember, Charlie filed his at the state level first, and then he took them to federal.
[47:55.900 --> 47:58.900]  Well, see, I don't think – I can't do that, I don't think.
[47:58.900 --> 48:02.900]  I mean, I don't really want to try and do it in the Oklahoma courts.
[48:02.900 --> 48:04.900]  I don't want to set foot up there until –
[48:04.900 --> 48:05.900]  No, no, I understand.
[48:05.900 --> 48:06.900]  I understand that.
[48:06.900 --> 48:12.900]  But Charlie was in California, and he went after the folks in California, so he didn't have to go federal.
[48:12.900 --> 48:16.900]  If you went after them in Oklahoma, you would.
[48:16.900 --> 48:17.900]  Right.
[48:17.900 --> 48:25.900]  Okay, well, if you got any other advice on this thing, or I'd like to talk to you, you know, I'll try to get ahold of you if you're –
[48:25.900 --> 48:29.900]  just kind of go over it, maybe some of what you're working on, I'm working on, we can work together on,
[48:29.900 --> 48:36.900]  because I think we're all trying to get the same thing put together to stop these guys wherever they are.
[48:36.900 --> 48:42.900]  That's what I'm hoping.
[48:42.900 --> 48:49.900]  Well, one other thing on this notice they sent me, they've got a thing here that says Judge Court Clerk,
[48:49.900 --> 48:57.900]  and then there's a – somebody wrote in the clerk's name, and then it says by, and then there's some initials.
[48:57.900 --> 49:01.900]  And it doesn't look like it's the initials of the court clerk, Nancy.
[49:01.900 --> 49:06.900]  Yeah, it's somebody certifying they've acted on her behalf.
[49:06.900 --> 49:12.900]  The other thing you'd want to find out is who it was and do they have the authority to act on her behalf.
[49:12.900 --> 49:16.900]  Well, how would you know with just initials R-N?
[49:16.900 --> 49:21.900]  Well, first thing I'd do is call up there and say, do you have anybody that works there with those initials?
[49:21.900 --> 49:25.900]  And what's their position? Who are they?
[49:25.900 --> 49:28.900]  Right.
[49:28.900 --> 49:35.900]  All right, well, that's pretty much all I got on this, unless y'all have some enlightenment to throw my way.
[49:35.900 --> 49:41.900]  Don't have any right to second from myself, but how about you, Randy?
[49:41.900 --> 49:48.900]  Well, just as a sage piece of advice, keep your dog close to the house.
[49:48.900 --> 49:50.900]  I'm going to bring him over to your house.
[49:50.900 --> 49:57.900]  Don't let him eat your motions.
[49:57.900 --> 50:03.900]  For those of you that don't know, that's a running joke with Randy and us.
[50:03.900 --> 50:05.900]  Anything else, Randy?
[50:05.900 --> 50:06.900]  That's it for me.
[50:06.900 --> 50:07.900]  Thanks, guys.
[50:07.900 --> 50:08.900]  Okay.
[50:08.900 --> 50:09.900]  Good night.
[50:09.900 --> 50:10.900]  Good night.
[50:10.900 --> 50:13.900]  Now, before we pick up the next caller, do we have any more, Deborah?
[50:13.900 --> 50:14.900]  No, we don't have any more right now.
[50:14.900 --> 50:15.900]  Okay.
[50:15.900 --> 50:25.900]  What I was going to say before going to break is I was going over a motion for this gentleman last night on the public intoxication case that he's got,
[50:25.900 --> 50:33.900]  and I was going through the criteria for the flowchart that we were talking about before we had the seminar and we tried to work out since then,
[50:33.900 --> 50:38.900]  but there's a whole lot of minutiae that would go into this.
[50:38.900 --> 50:48.900]  However, I've got more or less a high-level overview of the flow of how these things are supposed to work in relation to the individual codes,
[50:48.900 --> 50:51.900]  and so we'll start it like this.
[50:51.900 --> 50:55.900]  Texas transportation code, officer pulls you over.
[50:55.900 --> 51:01.900]  He pulls you over into the auspices of Section 543 transportation code.
[51:01.900 --> 51:12.900]  That's where the officer has the authority to write tickets and so on and so forth for anybody violating any section or part of Subtitle C, okay?
[51:12.900 --> 51:20.900]  Now, depending upon what the officer does at that point, he issues a citation, you go your merry way.
[51:20.900 --> 51:25.900]  Later on when you come in, here's where the legal black hole comes in.
[51:25.900 --> 51:28.900]  We have two possible options.
[51:28.900 --> 51:39.900]  If the transportation code actually did somehow or other fall under the auspices of the Code of Criminal Procedure as one of the things enumerated,
[51:39.900 --> 51:56.900]  immediately once you appear before the magistrate in response to that notice to appear on the ticket, the magistrate is immediately required to look at Article 15.17G as in George,
[51:56.900 --> 52:15.900]  which states very clearly that if a person in response to a citation issued, but here's the caveat, a citation issued under the criteria of 14.06B or C, okay?
[52:15.900 --> 52:23.900]  Then you are to do everything that's in this article, meaning 15.17.
[52:23.900 --> 52:35.900]  Now, if he goes and does that, he must immediately go from 15.17G as in George to 15.17B as in Bravo,
[52:35.900 --> 52:42.900]  because A deals with all of the things that the judge or the magistrate must do.
[52:42.900 --> 52:50.900]  However, that is short-circuited by the information in B which says what he must do.
[52:50.900 --> 52:57.900]  B stipulates that if the person is charged with a misdemeanor punishable by fine only,
[52:57.900 --> 53:13.900]  the magistrate may identify the accused with certainty and then notify them of a later date in which to appear at the county or statutory county court for the purpose of an arraignment.
[53:13.900 --> 53:23.900]  So get that. Chapter 543 Transportation Code, straight to 15.17G as in George, Code of Criminal Procedure,
[53:23.900 --> 53:30.900]  straight from 15.17G as in George to 15.17B as in Bravo.
[53:30.900 --> 53:38.900]  15.17B as in Bravo sends you to 26.01 Code of Criminal Procedure, Arraignment Hearing,
[53:38.900 --> 53:54.900]  where you run straight face first into a brick wall because it says an arraignment shall be held for the purposes of all felonies and misdemeanors punishable by imprisonment.
[53:54.900 --> 53:57.900]  We have hit a dead end.
[53:57.900 --> 54:06.900]  The original court had to surrender jurisdiction to send you to the county or statutory county court.
[54:06.900 --> 54:18.900]  The county or statutory county court has no jurisdiction because you cannot fall under the necessities of an arraignment according to 26.01.
[54:18.900 --> 54:29.900]  They can't remand you back to the original court because the original court won't have jurisdiction because an arraignment has still not been held.
[54:29.900 --> 54:32.900]  You are now in a vacuum.
[54:32.900 --> 54:36.900]  This is the legal black hole we were talking about.
[54:36.900 --> 54:49.900]  Where does someone cited for a transportation code offense go when they can't get anything as far as a process established under the law?
[54:49.900 --> 54:53.900]  Randy, I'd love to hear your comments on that, if you got any.
[54:53.900 --> 55:01.900]  We've been through that before and it looks like a legal black hole.
[55:01.900 --> 55:10.900]  It looks like in trying to structure the law so that it all interweaves and fits together, they missed a point.
[55:10.900 --> 55:12.900]  Yep.
[55:12.900 --> 55:25.900]  And in that point, they've got an issue because that pretty much means that those accused of class C misdemeanors are being prized of a right of substantive due process.
[55:25.900 --> 55:29.900]  And here's how that occurs.
[55:29.900 --> 55:47.900]  Since 1517A never gets performed, there's no opportunity to refer you to Chapter 16 where you are actually supposed to go through the entirety of an examining trial for the purpose of establishing probable cause.
[55:47.900 --> 55:50.900]  We never get there.
[55:50.900 --> 55:52.900]  Okay?
[55:52.900 --> 56:08.900]  Those of us accused of class C misdemeanors on a traffic citation or pretty much any other type of citation are denied the same level of due process as those accused of As and Bs and felonies.
[56:08.900 --> 56:18.900]  Now, we already know this is true because if they accuse us of a class C, they immediately deny us the right to assistance of counsel.
[56:18.900 --> 56:23.900]  Yet they still want to charge us under criminal statutes.
[56:23.900 --> 56:26.900]  I personally have a serious issue with this.
[56:26.900 --> 56:43.900]  Since the state constitution does not specify a division line over what type of crime is subject to the right to counsel and which one isn't, in its naive way it's simply stated in all criminal cases.
[56:43.900 --> 56:55.900]  And somehow our idiotic courts and justice system has determined that just because it's a class C crime, that doesn't qualify as all criminal cases.
[56:55.900 --> 57:02.900]  And so they attempt to deprive us of the right to due process by the assistance of counsel.
[57:02.900 --> 57:19.900]  In the same manner, they are now attempting to deprive us of the right to due process by failing to provide a method for us to get the same examining trial to establish probable cause that all the other misdemeanors and felonies get.
[57:19.900 --> 57:22.900]  We also cannot hold an arraignment.
[57:22.900 --> 57:31.900]  Now, 26.01 or 02 specifically says that an arraignment does two things and two things only.
[57:31.900 --> 57:40.900]  It fixes the identity of the accused and accepts his plea.
[57:40.900 --> 57:42.900]  That's it.
[57:42.900 --> 57:54.900]  Now, how many people have stood in front of a municipal or justice court judge and had the judge ask you, how do you plead?
[57:54.900 --> 57:57.900]  I have a problem with this.
[57:57.900 --> 58:07.900]  Since these courts have been directed to send you to the county court, where do they get the power to hold an arraignment to accept the plea?
[58:07.900 --> 58:13.900]  That specifically denied them in 15.17B.
[58:13.900 --> 58:17.900]  We'll go over that a little bit more when we get back after the break.
[58:17.900 --> 58:18.900]  All right.
[58:18.900 --> 58:22.900]  We also have Ken back on the line and Scott from Oregon.
[58:22.900 --> 58:23.900]  All right.
[58:22.900 --> 58:24.900]  Let's get Ken when we get back before we lose him again.
[58:24.900 --> 58:25.900]  Okay.
[58:25.900 --> 58:27.900]  We'll be back on the other side.
[58:27.900 --> 58:56.900]  We've got top of the hour news coming right up.
[58:57.900 --> 59:02.900]  This is Deborah Stevens from Rule of Law Radio.
[59:02.900 --> 59:11.900]  Many of you have been helped by the news and information you've received from 90.1 here in Austin over the years and now 90.1 needs your help.
[59:11.900 --> 59:21.900]  The operators of 90.1 are facing a long and expensive legal battle against the FCC to try to stay on the air as well as potentially being fined up to $20,000.
[59:21.900 --> 59:24.900]  Rule of Law Radio is not associated with 90.1.
[59:24.900 --> 59:29.900]  However, we have offered to help with legal matters as best we can and to pass on your donations.
[59:29.900 --> 59:47.900]  Please give as generously as you can by mailing your checks to Deborah Stevens, care of 90.1 Legal Fund, 1516 South Lamar, number 112, Austin, Texas, 78704, or giving through PayPal or credit card at ruleoflawradio.com.
[59:47.900 --> 59:56.900]  If you have ideas or other resources you'd like to contribute, please call 512-796-4197 and leave a message.
[59:56.900 --> 59:59.900]  Thank you, Austin.
[59:59.900 --> 01:00:03.900]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[01:00:03.900 --> 01:00:09.900]  In Iraq, rates of leukemia in children around Basra have tripled in the last 15 years.
[01:00:09.900 --> 01:00:18.900]  The American Journal of Public Health documented 700 cases of leukemia among children under 15 between 1992 and 2007.
[01:00:18.900 --> 01:00:30.900]  Researchers speculated increased exposure to byproducts of petroleum fires and benzene, war-related nerve agents, pesticides, and a widespread use of depleted uranium munition were to blame.
[01:00:30.900 --> 01:00:42.900]  Israel's Air Force Sunday introduced a fleet of huge pilotless planes that can remain in the air for a full day and could fly as far as the Persian Gulf, putting Iran within range.
[01:00:42.900 --> 01:00:49.900]  Israel has hinted at a military strike against Iran if world pressure fails to halt Tehran's nuclear program.
[01:00:49.900 --> 01:00:56.900]  Israel's military arsenal is funded mostly from a $30 billion U.S. military aid package.
[01:00:56.900 --> 01:01:03.900]  Unless the U.S. Congress bails them out, states will have to cut health coverage for low-income families and others without insurance.
[01:01:03.900 --> 01:01:13.900]  Lawmakers included higher Medicaid reimbursement funds for states in last year's economic stimulus bill, but the money will expire December 31st.
[01:01:13.900 --> 01:01:17.900]  Top of the hour news brought to you by INN World Report.
[01:01:17.900 --> 01:01:26.900]  Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reportedly authorized the assassination of senior Hamas official Mahmoud al-Mahfou.
[01:01:26.900 --> 01:01:32.900]  The U.K. Times Online says Netanyahu had a meeting with Mossad chief Mayor Dagan in early January.
[01:01:32.900 --> 01:01:35.900]  Citing Mossad sources, the Times said, quote,
[01:01:35.900 --> 01:01:43.900]  As the man who gives final authorization for such operations, Netanyahu was briefed on plans to kill Mahmoud al-Mahfou.
[01:01:43.900 --> 01:01:49.900]  Sources said Mossad had received intelligence that the Hamas commander was planning a Dubai trip.
[01:01:49.900 --> 01:01:56.900]  The paper said the team rehearsed the killing using a hotel room in Tel Aviv without alerting its owners.
[01:01:56.900 --> 01:02:03.900]  Thanks to Dubai's extensive system of closed-circuit TV cameras, the assassination team's movements were recorded.
[01:02:03.900 --> 01:02:10.900]  Dubai police released the identities of 11 people carrying European passports who allegedly were Mossad agents.
[01:02:10.900 --> 01:02:15.900]  Interpol has issued red notices for the 11 suspects to help find them.
[01:02:15.900 --> 01:02:23.900]  Dubai police threatened earlier to arrest Netanyahu if it determined Mossad was behind the assassination.
[01:02:23.900 --> 01:02:30.900]  After more than 16,000 drug-related murders, members of Mexican President Felipe Calderon's
[01:02:30.900 --> 01:02:36.900]  Conservative National Action Party, business lobbyists and the Catholic Church are agreeing with critics
[01:02:36.900 --> 01:02:40.900]  that the 50,000-strong army is not the solution to the problem.
[01:02:40.900 --> 01:02:46.900]  According to Time magazine, most criticism centers on gang-related violence, which has only worsened
[01:02:46.900 --> 01:02:51.900]  even as thousands of traffickers are jailed or extradited to the U.S.
[01:02:51.900 --> 01:02:56.900]  Top of the hour news brought to you by INN World Report.
[01:02:56.900 --> 01:03:13.900]  You are listening to the Rule of Law Radio Network at ruleoflawradio.com, live free speech talk radio at its best.
[01:03:27.900 --> 01:03:35.900]  Republicans and Republican nights, here's what we're talking about.
[01:03:35.900 --> 01:03:43.900]  Texas and this country need new leadership fast, and of that, damn, there's no room for doubt.
[01:03:43.900 --> 01:03:51.900]  We got the one, that's the one, with a vision that is second to none.
[01:03:51.900 --> 01:03:59.900]  We got the one, yeah, just the one, who's gonna do what they say can't be done.
[01:03:59.900 --> 01:04:07.900]  Well, I tell you, I've been from Medina, a true grassroots speech candidate.
[01:04:07.900 --> 01:04:24.900]  I'll be training my guitar to protect the Republican government, the new sweetheart of the Lone Star State.
[01:04:24.900 --> 01:04:31.900]  We got the power to change the way it is, to shut it all so that freedom can reign.
[01:04:31.900 --> 01:04:39.900]  If we just stick together like the birds on a feather, we can bring about most anything.
[01:04:39.900 --> 01:04:47.900]  We got the one, that's the one, with a vision that is second to none.
[01:04:47.900 --> 01:04:55.900]  We got the one, yeah, just the one, who's gonna do what they say can't be done.
[01:04:55.900 --> 01:05:03.900]  Now we're talking about Denver, Medina, a true grassroots people candidate.
[01:05:03.900 --> 01:05:16.900]  I'll be training my guitar to protect the Republican government, the new sweetheart of the Lone Star State.
[01:05:16.900 --> 01:05:25.900]  So what to do is such a short time to do it, Daisy Crockett's words really get rubbed down to you.
[01:05:25.900 --> 01:05:31.900]  Be sure you're right, and then just go ahead.
[01:05:31.900 --> 01:05:39.900]  We got the one, that's the one, with a vision that is second to none.
[01:05:39.900 --> 01:05:47.900]  We got the one, yeah, just the one, who's gonna do what they say can't be done.
[01:05:47.900 --> 01:05:55.900]  Now we're talking about Denver, Medina, a true grassroots people candidate.
[01:05:55.900 --> 01:06:11.900]  I'll just be training my guitar to protect the Republican government, the new sweetheart of the Lone Star State.
[01:06:11.900 --> 01:06:12.900]  We got the one.
[01:06:12.900 --> 01:06:14.900]  Okay, we're back.
[01:06:14.900 --> 01:06:19.900]  Deb Zewine, Deborah Medina, poor governor here in Texas.
[01:06:19.900 --> 01:06:22.900]  All right, looks like we got Ken back.
[01:06:22.900 --> 01:06:26.900]  Go ahead, Ken. Thanks for calling in. What's on your minds?
[01:06:26.900 --> 01:06:27.900]  Hi there.
[01:06:27.900 --> 01:06:37.900]  Eddie, I wanted to know if you could briefly go through some of the other relevant definitions that kind of support this argument.
[01:06:37.900 --> 01:06:44.900]  I've heard you go through them before on other shows, but I wasn't able to write them down quick enough.
[01:06:44.900 --> 01:06:52.900]  Okay, most of what you're dealing with here hinges on the terminology of person.
[01:06:52.900 --> 01:07:03.900]  In Texas law, it specifically states in Chapter 311 Government Code that all provisions and sections of law shall use the definitions of 311
[01:07:03.900 --> 01:07:13.900]  unless there is a specific exemption and changing of a definition within the section of statute itself.
[01:07:13.900 --> 01:07:19.900]  Now, when it says that it requires an explicit thing, it doesn't say that part in Chapter 311.
[01:07:19.900 --> 01:07:23.900]  It says that at the beginning of each of the codes themselves.
[01:07:23.900 --> 01:07:29.900]  In the beginning of the code, it will say something to the effect that Chapter 311 Government Code applies
[01:07:29.900 --> 01:07:37.900]  unless a specific exception excluding Chapter 311 is made within the statute.
[01:07:37.900 --> 01:07:40.900]  Now, so far, I've only found a couple of those.
[01:07:40.900 --> 01:07:49.900]  One is in the tax code, one is in the occupations code, and they are the only ones I've seen that specifically state
[01:07:49.900 --> 01:07:55.900]  the definition of person in Chapter 311 Government Code does not apply.
[01:07:55.900 --> 01:08:01.900]  The reason that's important, Chapter 311 Government Code very clearly shows
[01:08:01.900 --> 01:08:12.900]  that the term person includes only corporations, associations, government agencies, and governmental entities, and other legal entities.
[01:08:12.900 --> 01:08:23.900]  Basically meaning that the only thing the term person encompasses are statutory legal fictions like corporations.
[01:08:23.900 --> 01:08:32.900]  Transportation, look up black slot, definition of transportation because it's not defined in the code anywhere.
[01:08:32.900 --> 01:08:40.900]  Transportation, the movement of goods or services or persons from one place to another by means of a common carrier.
[01:08:40.900 --> 01:08:50.900]  Common carrier is a commercial carrier such as Greyhound, something of that nature, Amtrak, those are commercial carriers.
[01:08:50.900 --> 01:08:58.900]  Transport is just a subset of transportation, exactly the same deal.
[01:08:58.900 --> 01:09:01.900]  What is the legal definition of passenger?
[01:09:01.900 --> 01:09:04.900]  Someone says, well, you're operating a passenger vehicle.
[01:09:04.900 --> 01:09:05.900]  No, I'm not.
[01:09:05.900 --> 01:09:14.900]  By definition, a passenger is one that is paying someone to transport them from one place to another for compensation or hire, okay?
[01:09:14.900 --> 01:09:17.900]  Then you have the term traffic.
[01:09:17.900 --> 01:09:24.900]  Traffic by definition has a one-word definition all unto itself, commerce.
[01:09:24.900 --> 01:09:34.900]  So when they say that we are dealing with traffic statutes, we're dealing with commercial statutes, statutes regarding commerce.
[01:09:34.900 --> 01:09:45.900]  When they say we're dealing with transportation statutes, we're dealing with statutes that govern those engaged in commercial transportation functions.
[01:09:45.900 --> 01:09:52.900]  Trucking companies, Greyhound, Amtrak, those types of things.
[01:09:52.900 --> 01:10:02.900]  It's got nothing to do with the business and property of the people, nothing.
[01:10:02.900 --> 01:10:04.900]  Does that help?
[01:10:04.900 --> 01:10:16.900]  Okay, so those definitions clearly show that the codes as they try to convey to us are for commerce.
[01:10:16.900 --> 01:10:17.900]  That's correct.
[01:10:17.900 --> 01:10:25.900]  Now, if you want to verify that one bit further, look up the legal definition of the term license.
[01:10:25.900 --> 01:10:33.900]  A license is that thing which it would be otherwise illegal to perform an act without, okay?
[01:10:33.900 --> 01:10:39.900]  Now, what is the one thing that every license has attached to it?
[01:10:39.900 --> 01:10:45.900]  One thing, privilege.
[01:10:45.900 --> 01:10:47.900]  Well, that's the result of getting the license.
[01:10:47.900 --> 01:10:52.900]  What do you usually have to do before you get the license?
[01:10:52.900 --> 01:10:53.900]  Sign a contract.
[01:10:53.900 --> 01:10:55.900]  Pay a fee.
[01:10:55.900 --> 01:10:56.900]  Pay a fee.
[01:10:56.900 --> 01:10:57.900]  There you go.
[01:10:57.900 --> 01:11:08.900]  Okay, now, it has been ruled by the United States Supreme Court, the state may not convert a right into a privilege.
[01:11:08.900 --> 01:11:15.900]  License it and charge a fee for it.
[01:11:15.900 --> 01:11:19.900]  Okay, your rights cannot be converted into privileges.
[01:11:19.900 --> 01:11:26.900]  This is exactly why a right cannot be taxed and why a right cannot be regulated.
[01:11:26.900 --> 01:11:37.900]  If they can tax it or regulate it, they can remove it or block it or destroy it simply by setting the bar so high through the regulation
[01:11:37.900 --> 01:11:42.900]  or the tax that you cannot afford to exercise the right.
[01:11:42.900 --> 01:11:49.900]  That's specifically why such activity is prohibited to the legislature.
[01:11:49.900 --> 01:11:52.900]  Okay, that sounds excellent.
[01:11:52.900 --> 01:11:58.900]  Also, I hear some people I know are filing legal cases and the filing fees just keep getting higher and higher.
[01:11:58.900 --> 01:12:01.900]  It seems like they're doing that same thing with the courts.
[01:12:01.900 --> 01:12:02.900]  Yes, they are.
[01:12:02.900 --> 01:12:08.900]  They're trying to deny access to the courts by creating fees above and beyond anything allowed.
[01:12:08.900 --> 01:12:10.900]  But you know what?
[01:12:10.900 --> 01:12:14.900]  The people paid the taxes and created the courts.
[01:12:14.900 --> 01:12:19.900]  Why are we paying fees to our public servants to access our own courts?
[01:12:19.900 --> 01:12:29.900]  Why are we being made to pay in order to obtain justice that we hold dear and rightfully deserve to have every right to act upon?
[01:12:29.900 --> 01:12:34.900]  That's just another one of those things for revenue generation.
[01:12:34.900 --> 01:12:40.900]  Why are the people being made to pay to access their courts?
[01:12:40.900 --> 01:12:42.900]  We've already paid for them.
[01:12:42.900 --> 01:12:46.900]  Why are we being charged fees to get in?
[01:12:46.900 --> 01:12:47.900]  Well, that's excellent, Eddie.
[01:12:47.900 --> 01:12:49.900]  I have one other question.
[01:12:49.900 --> 01:12:51.900]  Thank you.
[01:12:51.900 --> 01:13:00.900]  I think I heard you mention the other night that there were instances when they might throw a party at the court and you might not appear.
[01:13:00.900 --> 01:13:06.900]  I was kind of curious about that because that may be a strategy that I'm considering.
[01:13:06.900 --> 01:13:11.900]  Well, in that regard, okay, now let me forewarn you here.
[01:13:11.900 --> 01:13:14.900]  Before they throw a party and you don't appear,
[01:13:14.900 --> 01:13:20.900]  make sure that you've crossed your T's and dotted your I's and not the other way around, okay?
[01:13:20.900 --> 01:13:22.900]  Yeah.
[01:13:22.900 --> 01:13:28.900]  When I'm invited to a party that I already know that the invitation by itself won't stand up,
[01:13:28.900 --> 01:13:34.900]  I have somewhere to go when I don't attend, okay?
[01:13:34.900 --> 01:13:39.900]  But if I haven't set that up and made that happen, I'll be there.
[01:13:39.900 --> 01:13:45.900]  You won't like it, but I'll be there.
[01:13:45.900 --> 01:13:46.900]  Okay.
[01:13:46.900 --> 01:13:52.900]  So by having somewhere else to go, you'd mean that it would just be inconvenient for you to be there at that time?
[01:13:52.900 --> 01:13:54.900]  Possibly, yes.
[01:13:54.900 --> 01:13:58.900]  But now in this case, take for instance the case here in Nacogdoches.
[01:13:58.900 --> 01:14:06.900]  The municipal court judge completely blew it in the fact that she did nothing she was required to do according to the Code of Criminal Procedure.
[01:14:06.900 --> 01:14:11.900]  The moment the officer and the judge acted outside of the duties established under law,
[01:14:11.900 --> 01:14:16.900]  they became trespassers ab initio, violators of the law.
[01:14:16.900 --> 01:14:22.900]  They became, every action they committed became fruit of the poison tree doctrine, okay?
[01:14:22.900 --> 01:14:26.900]  Therefore, nothing they did at any point was legal.
[01:14:26.900 --> 01:14:32.900]  I was no longer bound by anything they did because nothing they did was lawful.
[01:14:32.900 --> 01:14:36.900]  That's what I mean by I've already covered my bases.
[01:14:36.900 --> 01:14:42.900]  I have established and documented and submitted paperwork to the fact that you violated my due process,
[01:14:42.900 --> 01:14:46.900]  you violated this section of law, this section of law, and this section of law,
[01:14:46.900 --> 01:14:51.900]  which means you committed criminal acts in direct proportion to the duties of your office.
[01:14:51.900 --> 01:14:56.900]  You have no jurisdiction anywhere at any time.
[01:14:56.900 --> 01:15:03.900]  That's the one thing no judge can overcome is a lack of jurisdiction.
[01:15:03.900 --> 01:15:04.900]  Okay.
[01:15:04.900 --> 01:15:15.900]  So through your logic, then, you apply these fundamental rules of law that show that even if they did have jurisdiction,
[01:15:15.900 --> 01:15:21.900]  they violated fundamental practice, fundamental rights, and they've lost it.
[01:15:21.900 --> 01:15:22.900]  Correct.
[01:15:22.900 --> 01:15:25.900]  But that would be true of any court in any situation.
[01:15:25.900 --> 01:15:30.900]  The moment they violated your rights, they've screwed up.
[01:15:30.900 --> 01:15:36.900]  And it only takes one act at any point in the chain to make the whole chain worthless.
[01:15:36.900 --> 01:15:39.900]  I've run into them thinking differently about that, Eddie.
[01:15:39.900 --> 01:15:42.900]  Usually they think that, oh, well, we made an error.
[01:15:42.900 --> 01:15:43.900]  Thanks for pointing that out.
[01:15:43.900 --> 01:15:44.900]  You know what?
[01:15:44.900 --> 01:15:46.900]  Well, we're going to go ahead with the trial.
[01:15:46.900 --> 01:15:47.900]  Oh, yeah.
[01:15:47.900 --> 01:15:48.900]  You can appeal.
[01:15:48.900 --> 01:15:49.900]  That's right.
[01:15:49.900 --> 01:15:51.900]  And that's exactly how they like to do it.
[01:15:51.900 --> 01:15:58.900]  It may be because these lower court judges bank on the fact that they don't ever get appealed or that it's a trial de novo,
[01:15:58.900 --> 01:16:00.900]  so it never falls back on them.
[01:16:00.900 --> 01:16:04.900]  Because they're courts of no record, you get a trial de novo.
[01:16:04.900 --> 01:16:06.900]  Therefore, they never get appealed.
[01:16:06.900 --> 01:16:09.900]  Therefore, it's never on their record that they've been appealed.
[01:16:09.900 --> 01:16:14.900]  They're not held accountable for messing you over.
[01:16:14.900 --> 01:16:17.900]  What we're working on doing is changing that.
[01:16:17.900 --> 01:16:22.900]  I don't care if the higher-ups in the chain work you over or not.
[01:16:22.900 --> 01:16:26.900]  I'm going to do it myself with a lawsuit.
[01:16:26.900 --> 01:16:27.900]  Okay.
[01:16:27.900 --> 01:16:35.900]  So it's your belief and understanding that essentially the moment that they violate your right,
[01:16:35.900 --> 01:16:40.900]  that the process can stop right there and not go any further.
[01:16:40.900 --> 01:16:42.900]  They can't do so legally.
[01:16:42.900 --> 01:16:46.900]  But we'll get on the other side and hang on, and we'll finish that up on the other side, all right?
[01:16:46.900 --> 01:16:47.900]  Thank you.
[01:16:47.900 --> 01:16:48.900]  All right, Ken.
[01:16:48.900 --> 01:16:49.900]  Yeah, just stay on the line.
[01:16:49.900 --> 01:16:52.900]  We also have Scott and Frank on the line as well.
[01:16:52.900 --> 01:17:00.900]  We'll be taking your calls in just a moment.
[01:17:00.900 --> 01:17:01.900]  Hello, Austin.
[01:17:01.900 --> 01:17:06.900]  My name is Harlan Dietrich, owner of Brave New Books, a local independent bookstore here in town.
[01:17:06.900 --> 01:17:10.900]  Many of you are familiar with the bookstore and have attended some of our events.
[01:17:10.900 --> 01:17:16.900]  We've been proud to host speakers like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, Jim Mars, Catherine Aubrey, Webster Carpley, G. Edward Griffin,
[01:17:16.900 --> 01:17:19.900]  and many other heroic figures in the patriot movement.
[01:17:19.900 --> 01:17:21.900]  But now Brave New Books needs your help.
[01:17:21.900 --> 01:17:26.900]  In order to continue to provide a space for these events and be an outlet for hard-to-find materials,
[01:17:26.900 --> 01:17:30.900]  we're going to need you, Austin, to help spread the word about the bookstore.
[01:17:30.900 --> 01:17:34.900]  Please tell your friends and family about the wide variety of materials we offer.
[01:17:34.900 --> 01:17:38.900]  We also have DVD duplication capabilities for all you activists.
[01:17:38.900 --> 01:17:42.900]  Also, if you haven't visited us yet, please come down and show your support.
[01:17:42.900 --> 01:17:47.900]  It is so easy to support the big corporate chain stores that do nothing to further our message.
[01:17:47.900 --> 01:17:49.900]  Remember, you vote with your dollars.
[01:17:49.900 --> 01:17:50.900]  We're counting on you, Austin.
[01:17:50.900 --> 01:17:57.900]  If you need any information, please call 512-480-2503 or visit us at 1904 Guadalupe Street.
[01:17:57.900 --> 01:18:04.900]  Thank you, everyone.
[01:18:04.900 --> 01:18:11.900]  Thank you.
[01:18:34.900 --> 01:19:01.900]  Okay, we are back.
[01:19:01.900 --> 01:19:03.900]  We're speaking with Ken.
[01:19:03.900 --> 01:19:06.900]  Okay, Ken, go ahead.
[01:19:06.900 --> 01:19:15.900]  Okay, so, Eddie, we're talking about that the judge has to go through certain processes
[01:19:15.900 --> 01:19:21.900]  they have to afford you to do, due process, all of your rights, and all of their procedures.
[01:19:21.900 --> 01:19:23.900]  I'm paraphrasing.
[01:19:23.900 --> 01:19:32.900]  And the moment that they fail at that and run roughshod over us, that we can stop it right there.
[01:19:32.900 --> 01:19:34.900]  Is that what you're saying?
[01:19:34.900 --> 01:19:35.900]  That's exactly what I'm saying.
[01:19:35.900 --> 01:19:41.900]  Consider what the court does when it becomes evident that a police officer has violated the rights of the person arrested.
[01:19:41.900 --> 01:19:43.900]  He didn't read him his rights.
[01:19:43.900 --> 01:19:44.900]  He illegally searched his car.
[01:19:44.900 --> 01:19:46.900]  He illegally searched the individual.
[01:19:46.900 --> 01:19:49.900]  He abused the individual by excessive force.
[01:19:49.900 --> 01:19:58.900]  All of these things, at any point that it's found that the officer conducted himself in this manner, what happens?
[01:19:58.900 --> 01:19:59.900]  They have to throw the case out, usually.
[01:19:59.900 --> 01:20:00.900]  That's right.
[01:20:00.900 --> 01:20:02.900]  They have to throw it out.
[01:20:02.900 --> 01:20:11.900]  So what prevents that from going all the way up the line when the judge himself commits acts of the same nature?
[01:20:11.900 --> 01:20:13.900]  Well, they do like Jerry and I did today.
[01:20:13.900 --> 01:20:19.900]  We just wrote out some judicial conduct complaints.
[01:20:19.900 --> 01:20:26.900]  We'll be making criminal complaints, bar grievances, and motion to disqualify the judge.
[01:20:26.900 --> 01:20:38.900]  We put in there that the defendant has a right to a competent judge who can at least read and understand the English language.
[01:20:38.900 --> 01:20:39.900]  Yes.
[01:20:39.900 --> 01:20:42.900]  I'll be sure and let you guys know what I get in response.
[01:20:42.900 --> 01:20:54.900]  But I just sent a $5 million tort letter to the mayor of the city of Nacogdoches today naming the municipal court judge as one of the key respondents in the lawsuit that I intend to file
[01:20:54.900 --> 01:21:05.900]  because she not only violates my rights, but she violates the rights of every person that appears before her and she does it knowingly and willingly
[01:21:05.900 --> 01:21:12.900]  because as a public servant, she is deemed to know the law and she cannot be heard to say otherwise.
[01:21:12.900 --> 01:21:19.900]  When that judge does not follow law, they are acting in direct violation of law.
[01:21:19.900 --> 01:21:26.900]  And when they do that, isn't that why you're brought before them because they're saying you didn't follow the law?
[01:21:26.900 --> 01:21:29.900]  Right.
[01:21:29.900 --> 01:21:33.900]  So because they're sitting behind the bench and breaking the law, they're immune?
[01:21:33.900 --> 01:21:39.900]  I don't think so.
[01:21:39.900 --> 01:21:41.900]  Wow, that's pretty amazing.
[01:21:41.900 --> 01:21:47.900]  I'd sure like to listen to this audio once you post it up there.
[01:21:47.900 --> 01:21:49.900]  Well, it should be.
[01:21:49.900 --> 01:21:55.900]  That's up to Deborah there as to what that timeline is, but you're welcome to it.
[01:21:55.900 --> 01:21:56.900]  Well, thank you very much.
[01:21:56.900 --> 01:21:59.900]  I appreciate your great answers, Eddie, as usual.
[01:21:59.900 --> 01:22:00.900]  Yes, sir.
[01:22:00.900 --> 01:22:01.900]  Thank you.
[01:22:01.900 --> 01:22:02.900]  Okay.
[01:22:02.900 --> 01:22:03.900]  Good night now.
[01:22:03.900 --> 01:22:04.900]  Good night.
[01:22:04.900 --> 01:22:05.900]  Okay.
[01:22:05.900 --> 01:22:08.900]  We are going now to Scott in Oregon who's been hanging on the line for quite a while.
[01:22:08.900 --> 01:22:10.900]  Scott, thanks for calling in.
[01:22:10.900 --> 01:22:11.900]  What's on your mind tonight?
[01:22:11.900 --> 01:22:14.900]  Thank you for taking my call.
[01:22:14.900 --> 01:22:20.900]  I called a couple weeks ago actually and I've been looking at these tapes and trying to study them.
[01:22:20.900 --> 01:22:25.900]  I have an engineering degree and I still come through them a few times and I got a little lost.
[01:22:25.900 --> 01:22:31.900]  I was a whistleblower in Miami at a hospital at the U of M and, you know,
[01:22:31.900 --> 01:22:36.900]  I had one question about, you know how they say doctor shopping is illegal?
[01:22:36.900 --> 01:22:37.900]  How about police shopping?
[01:22:37.900 --> 01:22:39.900]  Is there anything illegal about police shopping?
[01:22:39.900 --> 01:22:41.900]  You go to one agency, you don't go to what you like.
[01:22:41.900 --> 01:22:45.900]  We'll go to another agency and we'll see if we can get what we like to there.
[01:22:45.900 --> 01:22:50.900]  Is there anything in the statutes because I couldn't find anything?
[01:22:50.900 --> 01:22:51.900]  Hello?
[01:22:51.900 --> 01:22:52.900]  Okay.
[01:22:52.900 --> 01:22:53.900]  I'm sorry.
[01:22:53.900 --> 01:23:00.900]  There is not a thing in the statutes to stop you from going to every policing agency that exists
[01:23:00.900 --> 01:23:05.900]  that could in any way possibly have jurisdiction.
[01:23:05.900 --> 01:23:11.900]  If one don't do their job, I go to the next one and try to get him to arrest the last one.
[01:23:11.900 --> 01:23:12.900]  There you go.
[01:23:12.900 --> 01:23:13.900]  All right.
[01:23:13.900 --> 01:23:17.900]  Another thing, I've done this case and this actually happened about two years ago,
[01:23:17.900 --> 01:23:20.900]  but I'm still fighting some parts of this.
[01:23:20.900 --> 01:23:28.900]  They said you have to be guilty to use a defense of entrapment.
[01:23:28.900 --> 01:23:29.900]  You have to be guilty.
[01:23:29.900 --> 01:23:36.900]  U of M said this stuff, they said I have an Ombudsman who's going to be between you
[01:23:36.900 --> 01:23:39.900]  and legal counsel just through Donna Shalala.
[01:23:39.900 --> 01:23:43.900]  We're going to use a VP of Human Resources, Paul Hudgens,
[01:23:43.900 --> 01:23:44.900]  and he's going to be the Ombudsman.
[01:23:44.900 --> 01:23:46.900]  We'll go through him.
[01:23:46.900 --> 01:23:49.900]  Well, I did everything he said and I ended up getting arrested for extortion.
[01:23:49.900 --> 01:23:52.900]  Even though I showed my whistleblower letter and everything else,
[01:23:52.900 --> 01:23:58.900]  I'll tell you afterwards, I'm just wondering is extortion mean you're guilty?
[01:23:58.900 --> 01:24:03.900]  I'm sorry, is saying it was entrapped mean you're guilty?
[01:24:03.900 --> 01:24:10.900]  Do you have to be guilty of something before you can claim entrapment?
[01:24:10.900 --> 01:24:12.900]  It kind of implies that.
[01:24:12.900 --> 01:24:19.900]  In order to claim that you were entrapped, you say, yeah, I did this thing,
[01:24:19.900 --> 01:24:22.900]  but he trapped me into it.
[01:24:22.900 --> 01:24:28.900]  So yeah, it kind of implies guilt to claim entrapment.
[01:24:28.900 --> 01:24:33.900]  I'm not sure if that's a decisive answer 100% of the time if you're entrapped.
[01:24:33.900 --> 01:24:35.900]  Wait, hold on, hold on, listen.
[01:24:35.900 --> 01:24:37.900]  Listen, Scott, we can't hear you very well.
[01:24:37.900 --> 01:24:39.900]  Are you on a speaker phone?
[01:24:39.900 --> 01:24:40.900]  I'm on my cell phone.
[01:24:40.900 --> 01:24:41.900]  Can you hear it all right?
[01:24:41.900 --> 01:24:42.900]  Okay, yeah, that's a little better.
[01:24:42.900 --> 01:24:44.900]  Just try to keep it.
[01:24:44.900 --> 01:24:46.900]  I'll keep it a little closer to you.
[01:24:46.900 --> 01:24:47.900]  I'm moving to the middle of the room.
[01:24:47.900 --> 01:24:48.900]  Okay.
[01:24:48.900 --> 01:24:53.900]  You know, I'm trying to get a definitive answer because this is something
[01:24:53.900 --> 01:24:55.900]  my lawyer wrote in the e-mails to me.
[01:24:55.900 --> 01:24:59.900]  If you say that you were entrapped, you are guilty of the crime.
[01:24:59.900 --> 01:25:02.900]  I mean, it was a flat statement that would hold people down.
[01:25:02.900 --> 01:25:04.900]  He's kind of pretty well right there.
[01:25:04.900 --> 01:25:05.900]  Okay.
[01:25:05.900 --> 01:25:06.900]  Let's go.
[01:25:06.900 --> 01:25:08.900]  Wait a minute.
[01:25:08.900 --> 01:25:10.900]  We need to understand what's going on here.
[01:25:10.900 --> 01:25:18.900]  If you were directed to do that by a superior and you acted in good faith
[01:25:18.900 --> 01:25:23.900]  and reliance on competent authority, that's a defense to prosecution.
[01:25:23.900 --> 01:25:24.900]  I'm sorry.
[01:25:24.900 --> 01:25:27.900]  Let me write down what you're saying because he's saying he was the
[01:25:27.900 --> 01:25:28.900]  Ombudsman.
[01:25:28.900 --> 01:25:29.900]  He instructed me to do that.
[01:25:29.900 --> 01:25:30.900]  That was my defense.
[01:25:30.900 --> 01:25:33.900]  And he's saying, oh, you're guilty of extortion.
[01:25:33.900 --> 01:25:36.900]  I was falsely fired, obviously, retaliation.
[01:25:36.900 --> 01:25:41.900]  So I called him up and he said, well, you and I will write the agreement up.
[01:25:41.900 --> 01:25:42.900]  He told me what to write.
[01:25:42.900 --> 01:25:46.900]  I went ahead and wrote on the first part, we'll agree for 6.8 million for
[01:25:46.900 --> 01:25:50.900]  false firing, and this came from other court cases that had looked up on
[01:25:50.900 --> 01:25:54.900]  false firing and medical stuff, not from a QTAM, just from false firing.
[01:25:54.900 --> 01:25:55.900]  Then we went it down.
[01:25:55.900 --> 01:25:57.900]  He said, well, I don't want it to go public.
[01:25:57.900 --> 01:26:01.900]  If you don't want it to go public, then I'll need you to do this and this and
[01:26:01.900 --> 01:26:02.900]  this for biomeds.
[01:26:02.900 --> 01:26:04.900]  And that was considered extortion.
[01:26:04.900 --> 01:26:07.900]  I've already gone public by reporting it to the state.
[01:26:07.900 --> 01:26:08.900]  That was what it said.
[01:26:08.900 --> 01:26:09.900]  Okay.
[01:26:09.900 --> 01:26:13.900]  You acted in good faith reliance on competent authority.
[01:26:13.900 --> 01:26:14.900]  I'm sorry.
[01:26:14.900 --> 01:26:15.900]  Let's see.
[01:26:15.900 --> 01:26:19.900]  Good faith reliance.
[01:26:19.900 --> 01:26:22.900]  Reliant.
[01:26:22.900 --> 01:26:24.900]  I'm sorry.
[01:26:24.900 --> 01:26:25.900]  I don't hear you.
[01:26:25.900 --> 01:26:30.900]  Good faith reliance on competent authority.
[01:26:30.900 --> 01:26:31.900]  Okay.
[01:26:31.900 --> 01:26:34.900]  I have another question.
[01:26:34.900 --> 01:26:38.900]  The one person I am going to start a lawsuit against, and this is my trial,
[01:26:38.900 --> 01:26:40.900]  so see how good I can get it at it.
[01:26:40.900 --> 01:26:41.900]  Once again, I got stuck.
[01:26:41.900 --> 01:26:46.900]  I have all the testimony that says a security guard called the state
[01:26:46.900 --> 01:26:48.900]  attorney's intake office.
[01:26:48.900 --> 01:26:53.900]  I went to the intake office, and their code of ethics says she can only take
[01:26:53.900 --> 01:26:59.900]  calls from law enforcement officials or officers, period.
[01:26:59.900 --> 01:27:04.900]  But she accepted a call from a security guard and authorized police chief
[01:27:04.900 --> 01:27:09.900]  Timothy in the city of Miami police to go ahead and set up and record telephone
[01:27:09.900 --> 01:27:12.900]  calls and go ahead and prosecute me.
[01:27:12.900 --> 01:27:16.900]  And they selectively picked, I can show where there were 400 phone calls and
[01:27:16.900 --> 01:27:17.900]  only take three of them.
[01:27:17.900 --> 01:27:20.900]  So I'm going to go after this Mary Jo Truffaut.
[01:27:20.900 --> 01:27:25.900]  Now, I try to look at the statute that says she exceeded her authority or
[01:27:25.900 --> 01:27:28.900]  something or violated her code of ethics.
[01:27:28.900 --> 01:27:31.900]  I've gone through, well, I've been looking for about four or six hours
[01:27:31.900 --> 01:27:33.900]  through things, but I don't find anything related.
[01:27:33.900 --> 01:27:35.900]  Wait, I got bad news for you.
[01:27:35.900 --> 01:27:36.900]  I'm sorry?
[01:27:36.900 --> 01:27:38.900]  I got bad news for you.
[01:27:38.900 --> 01:27:39.900]  Yeah.
[01:27:39.900 --> 01:27:42.900]  When she told you that she could only talk to law enforcement?
[01:27:42.900 --> 01:27:43.900]  Yes.
[01:27:43.900 --> 01:27:45.900]  She lied.
[01:27:45.900 --> 01:27:46.900]  It's in their code of ethics.
[01:27:46.900 --> 01:27:47.900]  She didn't tell me.
[01:27:47.900 --> 01:27:50.900]  It's actually written and printed in their code of ethics.
[01:27:50.900 --> 01:27:52.900]  Are you saying that was inaccurate and that's public?
[01:27:52.900 --> 01:27:58.900]  Wait, are you saying that a prosecuting attorney in their code of ethics can
[01:27:58.900 --> 01:28:01.900]  only speak to police officers?
[01:28:01.900 --> 01:28:02.900]  No, I'm sorry.
[01:28:02.900 --> 01:28:03.900]  That's not what I'm saying.
[01:28:03.900 --> 01:28:07.900]  In the state attorney's office, there's a division in there called the
[01:28:07.900 --> 01:28:08.900]  intake office.
[01:28:08.900 --> 01:28:13.900]  In the intake office, there's two supervisors and three subordinates who
[01:28:13.900 --> 01:28:18.900]  get together with police officers when they call in for a crime and they
[01:28:18.900 --> 01:28:19.900]  have a discussion.
[01:28:19.900 --> 01:28:25.900]  It says in there it's got to exceed, it's got to be, I'm sorry, trial ready
[01:28:25.900 --> 01:28:27.900]  before they act on it.
[01:28:27.900 --> 01:28:29.900]  They go through a process and they act on it.
[01:28:29.900 --> 01:28:33.900]  But part of their code of ethics says, if you read this line by line, I can
[01:28:33.900 --> 01:28:36.900]  probably scan it and then email it over to you.
[01:28:36.900 --> 01:28:40.900]  But it says in there, their code of ethics for the intake office, specific
[01:28:40.900 --> 01:28:45.900]  to them, is they can only talk to police or authorized agents of the law
[01:28:45.900 --> 01:28:47.900]  enforcement division.
[01:28:47.900 --> 01:28:49.900]  Oh, okay.
[01:28:49.900 --> 01:28:52.900]  That's because of the peculiar position that they're in.
[01:28:52.900 --> 01:28:53.900]  Okay.
[01:28:53.900 --> 01:28:58.900]  So if they take a call from a security guard and he initiates it, and this
[01:28:58.900 --> 01:29:01.900]  is actually all in that position and the testimony in the court.
[01:29:01.900 --> 01:29:04.900]  All sworn, the 30 days went by, everything happened there.
[01:29:04.900 --> 01:29:05.900]  That's pretty well done.
[01:29:05.900 --> 01:29:10.900]  Now, I'd like to know what statute has that.
[01:29:10.900 --> 01:29:14.900]  The reason I had to wait to do this is because the judge gives you this
[01:29:14.900 --> 01:29:19.900]  funny about appeals, when you're saying appealing it, there's no appeal.
[01:29:19.900 --> 01:29:20.900]  They let you go on probation.
[01:29:20.900 --> 01:29:23.900]  You sign a paper and sign your rights away for an appeal.
[01:29:23.900 --> 01:29:24.900]  Wait a minute.
[01:29:24.900 --> 01:29:25.900]  You're confusing us.
[01:29:25.900 --> 01:29:27.900]  You're going in too many different directions.
[01:29:27.900 --> 01:29:28.900]  Okay.
[01:29:28.900 --> 01:29:29.900]  Let's just go in the one.
[01:29:29.900 --> 01:29:35.900]  What do you look under to get the state attorneys?
[01:29:35.900 --> 01:29:39.900]  They probably have a procedural manual.
[01:29:39.900 --> 01:29:45.900]  I would know for Florida, we'd need Mark Adams for that.
[01:29:45.900 --> 01:29:46.900]  Mark Adams?
[01:29:46.900 --> 01:29:47.900]  Yeah.
[01:29:47.900 --> 01:29:48.900]  We're about to go to break.
[01:29:48.900 --> 01:29:49.900]  Yeah.
[01:29:49.900 --> 01:29:50.900]  Hold on.
[01:29:50.900 --> 01:29:52.900]  We'll answer that on the other side, Scott.
[01:29:52.900 --> 01:29:53.900]  Thank you.
[01:29:53.900 --> 01:29:54.900]  Okay.
[01:29:54.900 --> 01:29:56.900]  He's in Oregon, by the way, not Florida.
[01:29:56.900 --> 01:29:59.900]  Oh, Oregon.
[01:29:59.900 --> 01:30:02.900]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[01:30:02.900 --> 01:30:05.900]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary.
[01:30:05.900 --> 01:30:12.900]  The affordable, easy to understand, four CD course that will show you how in 24 hours,
[01:30:12.900 --> 01:30:13.900]  step by step.
[01:30:13.900 --> 01:30:17.900]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[01:30:17.900 --> 01:30:21.900]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[01:30:21.900 --> 01:30:26.900]  Thousands have won with our step by step course, and now you can too.
[01:30:26.900 --> 01:30:32.900]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney with 22 years of case winning experience.
[01:30:32.900 --> 01:30:38.900]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand about the principles
[01:30:38.900 --> 01:30:41.900]  and practices that control our American courts.
[01:30:41.900 --> 01:30:47.900]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials, forms for civil cases,
[01:30:47.900 --> 01:30:50.900]  pro se tactics, and much more.
[01:30:50.900 --> 01:31:02.900]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner or call toll free, 866-LAW-EZ.
[01:31:20.900 --> 01:31:47.900]  Thank you.
[01:31:47.900 --> 01:32:00.900]  Okay, we're back.
[01:32:00.900 --> 01:32:02.900]  We're speaking with Scott in Oregon.
[01:32:02.900 --> 01:32:04.900]  So it's Oregon, Randy, not Florida.
[01:32:04.900 --> 01:32:05.900]  Yes, Oregon.
[01:32:05.900 --> 01:32:06.900]  I thought I heard you say Miami.
[01:32:06.900 --> 01:32:08.900]  The case was in Florida.
[01:32:08.900 --> 01:32:10.900]  You're escaping from Miami.
[01:32:10.900 --> 01:32:12.900]  Oh, the case was in Florida.
[01:32:12.900 --> 01:32:14.900]  Okay.
[01:32:14.900 --> 01:32:15.900]  Yeah, that's what I thought.
[01:32:15.900 --> 01:32:20.900]  You were the one that called in before when you were in Miami when this occurred.
[01:32:20.900 --> 01:32:21.900]  Yes.
[01:32:21.900 --> 01:32:23.900]  Now I'm in Oregon to escape Dade County.
[01:32:23.900 --> 01:32:25.900]  Too much bad stuff.
[01:32:25.900 --> 01:32:30.900]  I'm going to have to go back to do this, I guess, but I'm going to do the best I can.
[01:32:30.900 --> 01:32:37.900]  Do you have a complete narrative of everything this went on?
[01:32:37.900 --> 01:32:38.900]  I have a timeline.
[01:32:38.900 --> 01:32:42.900]  It's pretty much a narrative, but it's a complete one timeline.
[01:32:42.900 --> 01:32:43.900]  Good.
[01:32:43.900 --> 01:32:47.900]  Then when you talk to us about it, follow the timeline.
[01:32:47.900 --> 01:32:51.900]  I'm getting lost because you're moving around too much and I have no idea where you're at.
[01:32:51.900 --> 01:32:53.900]  Just very nervous.
[01:32:53.900 --> 01:32:54.900]  Pardon me?
[01:32:54.900 --> 01:32:56.900]  Just very nervous.
[01:32:56.900 --> 01:32:59.900]  Yeah, I can hear that in your voice.
[01:32:59.900 --> 01:33:09.900]  If you're looking for specific rules of an organization like the attorney general's office,
[01:33:09.900 --> 01:33:13.900]  generally they will have procedural manuals.
[01:33:13.900 --> 01:33:17.900]  In the DPS in Texas, they have a captain's policy manual.
[01:33:17.900 --> 01:33:22.900]  Every agency tends to have procedural manuals.
[01:33:22.900 --> 01:33:25.900]  That's where you'll find this kind of rule.
[01:33:25.900 --> 01:33:27.900]  It's going to be internal rules.
[01:33:27.900 --> 01:33:32.900]  It's not going to be law at all, so you won't be able to cite it or use it,
[01:33:32.900 --> 01:33:38.900]  other than to show that this person acted outside of normal procedure.
[01:33:38.900 --> 01:33:42.900]  Is there a statute or is there a law for that outside of acting?
[01:33:42.900 --> 01:33:45.900]  How do you go about suing them if you can't find any precedent?
[01:33:45.900 --> 01:33:47.900]  That's always good to go to the court.
[01:33:47.900 --> 01:33:49.900]  This just goes to internal rules.
[01:33:49.900 --> 01:33:53.900]  Internal rules aren't going to have precedent because they're not law.
[01:33:53.900 --> 01:33:54.900]  They're not law.
[01:33:54.900 --> 01:34:01.900]  The worst case is you could get a summary letter in her personnel file.
[01:34:01.900 --> 01:34:05.900]  Yeah, probably.
[01:34:05.900 --> 01:34:14.900]  Unless you can show that she acted if she violated policy and caused you harm as a result.
[01:34:14.900 --> 01:34:15.900]  Yeah, of course.
[01:34:15.900 --> 01:34:18.900]  She's the one who initiated the police chief of Miami,
[01:34:18.900 --> 01:34:22.900]  authorized him to go ahead and prosecute and go ahead and do all the surveillance
[01:34:22.900 --> 01:34:25.900]  and everything on me that was just out of sight.
[01:34:25.900 --> 01:34:28.900]  They cherry-picked three recordings out of 40.
[01:34:28.900 --> 01:34:37.900]  Can you show that the investigation of you was malicious on its face by the person who did it,
[01:34:37.900 --> 01:34:42.900]  or did they get bad information from somebody else?
[01:34:42.900 --> 01:34:44.900]  Let me explain.
[01:34:44.900 --> 01:34:49.900]  This security officer, University of Miami lives next door to the intake office,
[01:34:49.900 --> 01:34:53.900]  State of Germany's office, who hires these city Miami police to do off-duty work.
[01:34:53.900 --> 01:34:55.900]  It's one big family there.
[01:34:55.900 --> 01:34:58.900]  They're located within two blocks of each other.
[01:34:58.900 --> 01:35:03.900]  This intake officer, the supervisor in the state attorney's office,
[01:35:03.900 --> 01:35:09.900]  when they called and said, oh, you go to police chief Timothy on my authority and tell him I said it's okay.
[01:35:09.900 --> 01:35:10.900]  Wait, wait, wait.
[01:35:10.900 --> 01:35:12.900]  This is taking way too long.
[01:35:12.900 --> 01:35:13.900]  I'm sorry.
[01:35:13.900 --> 01:35:15.900]  We've got other callers we've got to get to.
[01:35:15.900 --> 01:35:16.900]  Okay.
[01:35:16.900 --> 01:35:23.900]  Did he give this person information that if a reasonable person had this information,
[01:35:23.900 --> 01:35:27.900]  consider it cause to initiate a prosecution or an investigation,
[01:35:27.900 --> 01:35:32.900]  whether or not it was valid or whether it was valid or not?
[01:35:32.900 --> 01:35:38.900]  All that says in testimony and statements is that I was told to go to police chief Timothy,
[01:35:38.900 --> 01:35:41.900]  and that's essentially where it ends with her involvement.
[01:35:41.900 --> 01:35:43.900]  No information was exchanged.
[01:35:43.900 --> 01:35:46.900]  She didn't receive whistle-blower information or anything.
[01:35:46.900 --> 01:35:49.900]  She received only the information that the security officer wanted.
[01:35:49.900 --> 01:35:54.900]  Are you saying that she acted in violation of some law or rule of office
[01:35:54.900 --> 01:35:57.900]  that in the process denied you a right?
[01:35:57.900 --> 01:35:58.900]  Yes.
[01:35:58.900 --> 01:35:59.900]  Yes.
[01:35:59.900 --> 01:36:02.900]  It says she's supposed to investigate me and accumulate all the papers.
[01:36:02.900 --> 01:36:04.900]  None of that was done.
[01:36:04.900 --> 01:36:06.900]  She didn't accumulate any documents on me.
[01:36:06.900 --> 01:36:08.900]  There was no report generated.
[01:36:08.900 --> 01:36:09.900]  Okay.
[01:36:09.900 --> 01:36:13.900]  This is still too complex to try to do in this venue.
[01:36:13.900 --> 01:36:15.900]  Okay.
[01:36:15.900 --> 01:36:19.900]  There's too many questions, I'd have to spend two hours asking you questions
[01:36:19.900 --> 01:36:24.900]  in order to be able to formulate a reasonable answer.
[01:36:24.900 --> 01:36:25.900]  I'm confused.
[01:36:25.900 --> 01:36:27.900]  I appreciate your time.
[01:36:27.900 --> 01:36:29.900]  I'm sorry I can't give you a better answer.
[01:36:29.900 --> 01:36:34.900]  It's just what you're talking about is pretty involved and complex.
[01:36:34.900 --> 01:36:38.900]  Very involved and very complex, but I still think I'll initially go for this act
[01:36:38.900 --> 01:36:43.900]  in good faith relying on good authority and getting a procedure manual
[01:36:43.900 --> 01:36:46.900]  to see what I can bring out to the public side.
[01:36:46.900 --> 01:36:47.900]  I appreciate your time, Bill.
[01:36:47.900 --> 01:36:48.900]  You have a blessed night.
[01:36:48.900 --> 01:36:49.900]  Okay.
[01:36:49.900 --> 01:36:50.900]  And thank you for calling.
[01:36:50.900 --> 01:36:52.900]  Thank you.
[01:36:52.900 --> 01:36:53.900]  Okay.
[01:36:53.900 --> 01:36:55.900]  We had Ken from New York, a first-time caller.
[01:36:55.900 --> 01:36:56.900]  Sorry, Ken.
[01:36:56.900 --> 01:36:57.900]  He dropped off the line.
[01:36:57.900 --> 01:37:00.900]  Ken, if you'd like to call back in, we'll take you right away.
[01:37:00.900 --> 01:37:03.900]  We're going to go to Mark in Washington next.
[01:37:03.900 --> 01:37:05.900]  Go ahead, Mark.
[01:37:05.900 --> 01:37:06.900]  Hi.
[01:37:06.900 --> 01:37:07.900]  A question for Eddie.
[01:37:07.900 --> 01:37:18.900]  What was that case that you mentioned regarding the court cannot write into a privilege?
[01:37:18.900 --> 01:37:26.900]  I'd have to look up the case law on it, but let me see what I can find on it right quick.
[01:37:26.900 --> 01:37:28.900]  Let's see.
[01:37:28.900 --> 01:37:29.900]  You were going to say something, Randy?
[01:37:29.900 --> 01:37:34.900]  Yeah, I was going to say there's probably a stack of those about a foot high.
[01:37:34.900 --> 01:37:35.900]  That's good to hear.
[01:37:35.900 --> 01:37:41.900]  That's been addressed often, so that shouldn't be hard to find.
[01:37:41.900 --> 01:37:43.900]  Okay.
[01:37:43.900 --> 01:37:45.900]  Are you in Texas?
[01:37:45.900 --> 01:37:46.900]  No.
[01:37:46.900 --> 01:37:49.900]  Oh, you can almost certainly find that in the state you're in.
[01:37:49.900 --> 01:37:52.900]  This goes to really basic law.
[01:37:52.900 --> 01:37:54.900]  Okay.
[01:37:54.900 --> 01:37:55.900]  All right.
[01:37:55.900 --> 01:38:03.900]  And then related to Eddie's earlier about the traffic and so on or the registration license,
[01:38:03.900 --> 01:38:05.900]  I was just kind of curious.
[01:38:05.900 --> 01:38:11.900]  I apologize if I missed this on another show or something about what maybe your history was once you had changed
[01:38:11.900 --> 01:38:18.900]  or gone to the non-registered or licensed person and your own plate and so on
[01:38:18.900 --> 01:38:24.900]  on what kind of response you had gotten from the locals first off and then maybe later down the road,
[01:38:24.900 --> 01:38:30.900]  and what if any different response you might have if you drive into different counties or even other states?
[01:38:30.900 --> 01:38:35.900]  Well, the truth is I drove around for almost two years before I ever got stopped.
[01:38:35.900 --> 01:38:37.900]  That's kind of amazing.
[01:38:37.900 --> 01:38:42.900]  Now, when I finally did get stopped here in my hometown of Nacogdoches, all they do is write you tickets,
[01:38:42.900 --> 01:38:45.900]  and then, of course, you go to court and do the usual blah, blah, blah.
[01:38:45.900 --> 01:38:46.900]  Right.
[01:38:46.900 --> 01:38:52.900]  I tend to file my paperwork, and suddenly I don't go to court no more.
[01:38:52.900 --> 01:38:54.900]  And that's not meant to be bragging.
[01:38:54.900 --> 01:39:01.900]  That just seems to be the fact that they don't wish to argue the merits once I show them what the merits actually are.
[01:39:01.900 --> 01:39:08.900]  In the case of right now, we've had since the seminar, just the seminar book alone all by itself
[01:39:08.900 --> 01:39:20.900]  has managed to completely run away a DPS trooper, a municipal judge and clerk, and what I guess, who was the other officer?
[01:39:20.900 --> 01:39:25.900]  Oh, it was another police officer in Houston.
[01:39:25.900 --> 01:39:30.900]  One of the listeners brought the information to his attention that why are you going to write my mother-in-law a ticket?
[01:39:30.900 --> 01:39:33.900]  You're only allowed to operate against commercial vehicles.
[01:39:33.900 --> 01:39:36.900]  And the cop got huffy and turned around and walked off.
[01:39:36.900 --> 01:39:39.900]  And he had pulled the lady over for speeding.
[01:39:39.900 --> 01:39:48.900]  In my case, city of Rockdale, they pulled me over, arrested me for about 30 minutes to an hour, turned around and let me go.
[01:39:48.900 --> 01:39:54.900]  And then a week later, after I'd given the officer a copy of the seminar book, a week later in the mail,
[01:39:54.900 --> 01:39:59.900]  I received a complete dismissal and my bond back.
[01:39:59.900 --> 01:40:04.900]  I never even had to go back to court, and I didn't even file the first piece of paperwork.
[01:40:04.900 --> 01:40:06.900]  That's awesome.
[01:40:06.900 --> 01:40:07.900]  All right.
[01:40:07.900 --> 01:40:10.900]  Well, thanks for the information and all the efforts you guys always do.
[01:40:10.900 --> 01:40:11.900]  Thank you.
[01:40:11.900 --> 01:40:12.900]  Bye.
[01:40:12.900 --> 01:40:13.900]  Yes, sir.
[01:40:13.900 --> 01:40:14.900]  All right.
[01:40:14.900 --> 01:40:15.900]  Thanks, Mark.
[01:40:15.900 --> 01:40:16.900]  All right.
[01:40:16.900 --> 01:40:17.900]  Now we're going to go to Frank.
[01:40:17.900 --> 01:40:18.900]  I can.
[01:40:18.900 --> 01:40:19.900]  What's on your mind tonight?
[01:40:19.900 --> 01:40:20.900]  First time caller.
[01:40:20.900 --> 01:40:21.900]  Hi.
[01:40:21.900 --> 01:40:23.900]  That's a traffic issue.
[01:40:23.900 --> 01:40:27.900]  I got railroaded in a small town in New York.
[01:40:27.900 --> 01:40:34.900]  And after that, most of the officers there let me drive around with no license, registration and insurance.
[01:40:34.900 --> 01:40:42.900]  They decided they weren't going to let me do that anymore, and they got their rough canine guy to come after me.
[01:40:42.900 --> 01:40:49.900]  And I basically told him to put all the tickets on the dashboard and I want the originals.
[01:40:49.900 --> 01:40:56.900]  And he snuck up on me and threw all the copies on my dashboard and took off.
[01:40:56.900 --> 01:40:57.900]  Look at the crap.
[01:40:57.900 --> 01:41:00.900]  Didn't even take my car or nothing.
[01:41:00.900 --> 01:41:10.900]  Because I had explained to all the other officers in town that what I was doing was justified and had lectures with them and everything.
[01:41:10.900 --> 01:41:17.900]  And they basically were fine with it, but I guess somebody up there didn't like it and they were going to stop that.
[01:41:17.900 --> 01:41:20.900]  Was there any chance his officers knew?
[01:41:20.900 --> 01:41:23.900]  No, he was hardcore.
[01:41:23.900 --> 01:41:26.900]  He was the canine guy.
[01:41:26.900 --> 01:41:36.900]  He smacked his truck into a tree, killed his dog, and I had to wait five months before I could try to school him in court.
[01:41:36.900 --> 01:41:44.900]  But when I got to court, the district attorney made an offer and I told him, are you representing the officer?
[01:41:44.900 --> 01:41:48.900]  And he shut his mouth and ran behind the judge.
[01:41:48.900 --> 01:41:51.900]  And I thought, well, this is peculiar.
[01:41:51.900 --> 01:41:58.900]  Now the judge started to act like his little guard dog and started barking at me, you want a trial, you want a trial, you want a trial.
[01:41:58.900 --> 01:42:02.900]  And I said, well, I'm totally intimidated now.
[01:42:02.900 --> 01:42:05.900]  I'm the last person in court, so I just shut my mouth.
[01:42:05.900 --> 01:42:12.900]  I took my paper and got the hell out of there before I got arrested or something and figured, oh, well, I didn't turn any paperwork in.
[01:42:12.900 --> 01:42:19.900]  I didn't turn any claim of right, no notice of understanding, nothing.
[01:42:19.900 --> 01:42:22.900]  What was the paper they offered you?
[01:42:22.900 --> 01:42:27.900]  They offered me a notice to appear for trial.
[01:42:27.900 --> 01:42:37.900]  So I said, I'm just going to get this over with and sue the judge for railroading me, intimidating me, calling me crazy, calling me insane.
[01:42:37.900 --> 01:42:43.900]  And I went into court and ran through his worst.
[01:42:43.900 --> 01:42:47.900]  I was the first one up there, he was going to set me up as an example.
[01:42:47.900 --> 01:42:56.900]  And they pulled that guy out of his wheelchair and they stood him up there and they proceeded with trial.
[01:42:56.900 --> 01:43:04.900]  And I was like, I expected, so I printed up the whole Constitution and I put that right on the bench.
[01:43:04.900 --> 01:43:06.900]  And I said, does this document apply in this courtroom?
[01:43:06.900 --> 01:43:08.900]  He said, no.
[01:43:08.900 --> 01:43:10.900]  I said, well, I object.
[01:43:10.900 --> 01:43:12.900]  Which Constitution?
[01:43:12.900 --> 01:43:15.900]  The Constitution of New York.
[01:43:15.900 --> 01:43:20.900]  I printed it up, 86 pages, and I put it right on the bench and I said, does this document apply?
[01:43:20.900 --> 01:43:23.900]  Now, the judge, who said this, the judge?
[01:43:23.900 --> 01:43:24.900]  The judge, yes.
[01:43:24.900 --> 01:43:26.900]  How many people were in court?
[01:43:26.900 --> 01:43:27.900]  Everybody.
[01:43:27.900 --> 01:43:28.900]  I was the first one up.
[01:43:28.900 --> 01:43:29.900]  There was like 200 people in there.
[01:43:29.900 --> 01:43:30.900]  No, no, no.
[01:43:30.900 --> 01:43:31.900]  Okay, fine.
[01:43:31.900 --> 01:43:32.900]  Did you need one other?
[01:43:32.900 --> 01:43:39.900]  Then all you need is a bunch of affidavits certifying they heard the judge confess to prison and open court.
[01:43:39.900 --> 01:43:41.900]  Great.
[01:43:41.900 --> 01:43:42.900]  Oh, hang on.
[01:43:42.900 --> 01:43:43.900]  I got it under.
[01:43:43.900 --> 01:43:44.900]  Okay, hang on the line, Frank.
[01:43:44.900 --> 01:43:46.900]  And then we'll go to Dominic.
[01:43:46.900 --> 01:43:59.900]  We'll be right back.
[01:43:59.900 --> 01:44:04.900]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls, letters, or even lawsuits?
[01:44:04.900 --> 01:44:08.900]  Stop debt collectors now with the Michael Mears proven method.
[01:44:08.900 --> 01:44:13.900]  Michael Mears has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors, and now you can win two.
[01:44:13.900 --> 01:44:19.900]  You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain English on how to win in court using federal civil rights statutes.
[01:44:19.900 --> 01:44:23.900]  What to do when contacted by phone, mail, or court summons.
[01:44:23.900 --> 01:44:25.900]  How to answer letters and phone calls.
[01:44:25.900 --> 01:44:27.900]  How to get debt collectors out of your credit report.
[01:44:27.900 --> 01:44:32.900]  How to turn your financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away.
[01:44:32.900 --> 01:44:37.900]  The Michael Mears proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors.
[01:44:37.900 --> 01:44:39.900]  Personal consultation is available as well.
[01:44:39.900 --> 01:44:45.900]  For more information, please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the blue Michael Mears banner.
[01:44:45.900 --> 01:44:48.900]  Or email michaelmears at yahoo.com.
[01:44:48.900 --> 01:44:50.900]  That's ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:44:50.900 --> 01:44:56.900]  Or email m-i-c-h-a-e-l-m-i-r-r-a-s at yahoo.com.
[01:44:56.900 --> 01:45:06.900]  To learn how to stop debt collectors now.
[01:45:06.900 --> 01:45:21.900]  Hello. Oh, man. In jail. You got busted, man. Oh, man. I'm broke, man.
[01:45:21.900 --> 01:45:29.900]  Some things in this world I will never understand. Some things I realize foolish.
[01:45:29.900 --> 01:45:33.900]  Somebody's going to police. I police.
[01:45:33.900 --> 01:45:38.900]  We are back. We're speaking with Frank in New York.
[01:45:38.900 --> 01:45:41.900]  Okay. Go ahead, Frank. You had something else for us?
[01:45:41.900 --> 01:45:52.900]  Yeah. Also, I wanted to know if I can get a – since I'm going to do a negative impairment with the –
[01:45:52.900 --> 01:45:59.900]  what do you call them? Attorney General of the – I don't know, the state or whatever. My friend did one.
[01:45:59.900 --> 01:46:09.900]  I want him to put me on a list to leave me alone. Basically, if I get pulled over, they run my sovereign name,
[01:46:09.900 --> 01:46:14.900]  and it comes up on the list, red flag, leave this guy alone. Good day, sir.
[01:46:14.900 --> 01:46:19.900]  Is there a list like that in Texas? Or you know of that list?
[01:46:19.900 --> 01:46:23.900]  If they have such a list, they won't admit it.
[01:46:23.900 --> 01:46:24.900]  Oh, they won't admit it.
[01:46:24.900 --> 01:46:26.900]  But I'm sure they have it.
[01:46:26.900 --> 01:46:34.900]  I'm sure they have it. So I'm going to do my negative impairment with the – I'm looking at the light of the land right now.
[01:46:34.900 --> 01:46:37.900]  This is my second experience with this whole thing.
[01:46:37.900 --> 01:46:41.900]  My first experience was in the town of Ulster, and they basically loved me there.
[01:46:41.900 --> 01:46:47.900]  From all the things I stood – I turned my papers in. They were very nice to me.
[01:46:47.900 --> 01:46:54.900]  I turned my claim of right, notice of understanding, and notice of intent, and stood on my hip for work like you said, Randy.
[01:46:54.900 --> 01:47:02.900]  It really helped me because I didn't stray. I didn't – I listened to your radio program, and you said, stay on your paperwork.
[01:47:02.900 --> 01:47:04.900]  Well, that's what I did, and it worked.
[01:47:04.900 --> 01:47:08.900]  And I got to the last phase, the last time they invited me to come.
[01:47:08.900 --> 01:47:13.900]  I said, I accept your invitation. I came there, and they said, well, we're going to offer you a deal.
[01:47:13.900 --> 01:47:16.900]  And I said, well, go ahead and offer.
[01:47:16.900 --> 01:47:24.900]  They said, we're going to give you a simple driving license. We're going to waive the fines, and we're going to waive the surcharge.
[01:47:24.900 --> 01:47:28.900]  We're going to – no, we're going to discharge the surcharge, they said.
[01:47:28.900 --> 01:47:37.900]  Well, I said, you know, if I had time to come here again, which I don't, 20 miles away, I said, I wouldn't accept your offer.
[01:47:37.900 --> 01:47:45.900]  But since you're a nice lady, and I know people who know you, I said, I'm going to accept that offer.
[01:47:45.900 --> 01:47:52.900]  And I did, and that was it. I had no registration, no license, no insurance charge.
[01:47:52.900 --> 01:47:55.900]  So are you still there?
[01:47:55.900 --> 01:47:56.900]  Yeah.
[01:47:56.900 --> 01:48:01.900]  Okay. Well, there's a couple things I'd recommend you do in this.
[01:48:01.900 --> 01:48:08.900]  When you've got all this going, one of the things that I'm going to start doing – and I got this idea from Tim, who said a friend of his does it.
[01:48:08.900 --> 01:48:12.900]  But actually, I've seen them do it, so it will be good to try.
[01:48:12.900 --> 01:48:25.900]  Whenever you go into these courts, folks, one of the first things you want to do is file a motion for a fair hearing or a fair trial, and let the judge deny it.
[01:48:25.900 --> 01:48:27.900]  All right.
[01:48:27.900 --> 01:48:33.900]  Let the judge deny your motion to have a fair trial.
[01:48:33.900 --> 01:48:37.900]  Just make sure that when the judge says, I'm denying all your motions, say, that's fine.
[01:48:37.900 --> 01:48:41.900]  I would just like a copy of that motion right there, please.
[01:48:41.900 --> 01:48:50.900]  Also, I would like people to know that if you file a fee schedule in your claim of right, when you put your claims down, if you file a fee schedule,
[01:48:50.900 --> 01:48:56.900]  and then they order you to go for a psychiatric evaluation, you ask them for an order and you want a copy of the order,
[01:48:56.900 --> 01:49:02.900]  and then you charge them $300 an hour or whatever you charge, $5,000 an hour or whatever.
[01:49:02.900 --> 01:49:04.900]  It doesn't matter what you charge.
[01:49:04.900 --> 01:49:11.900]  They shut up really quick, and they start to backpedal.
[01:49:11.900 --> 01:49:13.900]  That's what happened to me.
[01:49:13.900 --> 01:49:16.900]  You must have talked to Tim Turner.
[01:49:16.900 --> 01:49:17.900]  No, no.
[01:49:17.900 --> 01:49:24.900]  It's actually Robert Arthur Menard of the Free Man and the Land Society.
[01:49:24.900 --> 01:49:28.900]  I think it's the Elizabeth Lane Society now.
[01:49:28.900 --> 01:49:30.900]  Well, that's interesting.
[01:49:30.900 --> 01:49:35.900]  I went to one of Tim's seminars, and I've got a fee schedule somewhere.
[01:49:35.900 --> 01:49:36.900]  I need to dig that out.
[01:49:36.900 --> 01:49:38.900]  You've got to put that in.
[01:49:38.900 --> 01:49:50.900]  Once they pass the 14, 30 days or whatever you get to respond, they've got no rebuttal.
[01:49:50.900 --> 01:49:52.900]  Whatever's in your papers, stay.
[01:49:52.900 --> 01:49:55.900]  If it's lawful, it's got to stay in there.
[01:49:55.900 --> 01:49:58.900]  So I recommend it.
[01:49:58.900 --> 01:50:00.900]  Everybody put a fee schedule.
[01:50:00.900 --> 01:50:05.900]  It really cuts the crap.
[01:50:05.900 --> 01:50:07.900]  They stop ordering you.
[01:50:07.900 --> 01:50:08.900]  They stop arresting you.
[01:50:08.900 --> 01:50:09.900]  They stop putting you in jail.
[01:50:09.900 --> 01:50:14.900]  They stop doing all these things because you've got a fee schedule for everything.
[01:50:14.900 --> 01:50:15.900]  Sure, you can put me in jail.
[01:50:15.900 --> 01:50:18.900]  You've got all the gun, but I charge $2,000 an hour.
[01:50:18.900 --> 01:50:22.900]  I just want to let you know.
[01:50:22.900 --> 01:50:25.900]  They just don't like that.
[01:50:25.900 --> 01:50:29.900]  They don't like the idea that they're going to be responsible.
[01:50:29.900 --> 01:50:30.900]  Okay.
[01:50:30.900 --> 01:50:35.900]  How do you get authority to enforce the fee schedule?
[01:50:35.900 --> 01:50:41.900]  I've never heard of anybody enforcing this fee schedule, but it scares the daylights out of them
[01:50:41.900 --> 01:50:43.900]  because they have no clue.
[01:50:43.900 --> 01:50:45.900]  Like you said, Randy, they don't study law.
[01:50:45.900 --> 01:50:48.900]  They have no clue.
[01:50:48.900 --> 01:50:49.900]  Send a little bill for your fee schedule.
[01:50:49.900 --> 01:50:53.900]  I think you have to publish the fee schedule in public records.
[01:50:53.900 --> 01:50:54.900]  Exactly.
[01:50:54.900 --> 01:50:55.900]  It's published in the court.
[01:50:55.900 --> 01:50:58.900]  I mean, once you notarize it, it's notified.
[01:50:58.900 --> 01:51:00.900]  The public is notified.
[01:51:00.900 --> 01:51:07.900]  I mean, you can go further and publish it in the newspaper or publish it on YouTube or whatever,
[01:51:07.900 --> 01:51:10.900]  as long as it's public.
[01:51:10.900 --> 01:51:12.900]  It's notarized.
[01:51:12.900 --> 01:51:15.900]  You can post it on a website and it'll be published.
[01:51:15.900 --> 01:51:17.900]  Yeah, you can do a website.
[01:51:17.900 --> 01:51:20.900]  Anywhere in the public, though, I heard.
[01:51:20.900 --> 01:51:23.900]  Wherever it's public.
[01:51:23.900 --> 01:51:31.900]  You can put it in maybe the grocery store or where people want.
[01:51:31.900 --> 01:51:33.900]  Anybody will see it.
[01:51:33.900 --> 01:51:36.900]  As long as it's public.
[01:51:36.900 --> 01:51:37.900]  Okay.
[01:51:37.900 --> 01:51:39.900]  We're running out of time and we have one more caller.
[01:51:39.900 --> 01:51:42.900]  I'll call on again Thursday, I guess.
[01:51:42.900 --> 01:51:43.900]  Good.
[01:51:43.900 --> 01:51:44.900]  Good.
[01:51:44.900 --> 01:51:45.900]  Thank you.
[01:51:45.900 --> 01:51:46.900]  Okay.
[01:51:46.900 --> 01:51:47.900]  Thanks, Frank.
[01:51:47.900 --> 01:51:48.900]  Okay.
[01:51:48.900 --> 01:51:49.900]  We're going now to Dominic in Texas.
[01:51:49.900 --> 01:51:50.900]  Dominic, thanks for calling in.
[01:51:50.900 --> 01:51:52.900]  What's on your mind tonight?
[01:51:52.900 --> 01:51:54.900]  Thanks for taking my call.
[01:51:54.900 --> 01:52:01.900]  I'm going to go ahead and change the subject here, unless Randy has his finger on the Zapper button.
[01:52:01.900 --> 01:52:02.900]  Okay.
[01:52:02.900 --> 01:52:03.900]  Wait a minute, Dominic.
[01:52:03.900 --> 01:52:06.900]  Are you going to ask me another one of those hard questions that I can't answer?
[01:52:06.900 --> 01:52:07.900]  No, sir.
[01:52:07.900 --> 01:52:08.900]  I have some good news.
[01:52:08.900 --> 01:52:09.900]  Okay.
[01:52:09.900 --> 01:52:10.900]  Good.
[01:52:10.900 --> 01:52:13.900]  It's pertaining to that credit card situation.
[01:52:13.900 --> 01:52:19.900]  I sent them the paperwork that I received from the Michael Mears package,
[01:52:19.900 --> 01:52:25.900]  and the first letter I got back from them, they wanted a copy of my credit report for the past 30 days,
[01:52:25.900 --> 01:52:29.900]  and there was some letter explaining the dispute.
[01:52:29.900 --> 01:52:37.900]  Shortly after that, I received the information from TransUnion saying that they deleted the account.
[01:52:37.900 --> 01:52:47.900]  Shortly after that, I received three letters from the credit card apologizing profusely that it was all a big mistake.
[01:52:47.900 --> 01:52:49.900]  So they didn't want to play?
[01:52:49.900 --> 01:52:50.900]  They didn't want to play.
[01:52:50.900 --> 01:52:52.900]  Darn the luck.
[01:52:52.900 --> 01:52:54.900]  Yeah.
[01:52:54.900 --> 01:52:58.900]  So I take it Mike Mears' stuff was a good investment?
[01:52:58.900 --> 01:52:59.900]  Yes, sir.
[01:52:59.900 --> 01:53:01.900]  It didn't take any time at all.
[01:53:01.900 --> 01:53:07.900]  They just deleted it right from the beginning, right out of hand.
[01:53:07.900 --> 01:53:08.900]  Good news.
[01:53:08.900 --> 01:53:10.900]  I'm glad to hear that.
[01:53:10.900 --> 01:53:11.900]  That's awesome.
[01:53:11.900 --> 01:53:12.900]  Huh?
[01:53:12.900 --> 01:53:16.900]  We've been hearing a lot of success stories about the Michael Mears package, that's for sure.
[01:53:16.900 --> 01:53:19.900]  That's one of the old versions.
[01:53:19.900 --> 01:53:20.900]  Old versions?
[01:53:20.900 --> 01:53:21.900]  I'm sorry.
[01:53:21.900 --> 01:53:25.900]  I'm reading this thing here on my screen.
[01:53:25.900 --> 01:53:26.900]  I'm sorry.
[01:53:26.900 --> 01:53:29.900]  I was thinking out loud.
[01:53:29.900 --> 01:53:33.900]  Well, I just wanted to give you all the news about this.
[01:53:33.900 --> 01:53:36.900]  I said I'd keep you all informed of what's going on.
[01:53:36.900 --> 01:53:40.900]  But yeah, they said that it was all a big misunderstanding.
[01:53:40.900 --> 01:53:48.900]  They said that the amount that they had put on the 1099, the cancellation of debt for my income tax,
[01:53:48.900 --> 01:53:49.900]  that that was a mistake.
[01:53:49.900 --> 01:53:55.900]  And then they sent me another letter saying that something about my Social Security number
[01:53:55.900 --> 01:54:01.900]  and some other numbers that they had on their file, that's what caused the mistake.
[01:54:01.900 --> 01:54:06.900]  So it was just, like I said, three letters apologizing.
[01:54:06.900 --> 01:54:08.900]  You must have really got their attention.
[01:54:08.900 --> 01:54:14.900]  Yeah, it was a pretty good letter I sent them because I reformatted it for it to be pertaining to me
[01:54:14.900 --> 01:54:18.900]  because the one that comes with the package is just, like, general.
[01:54:18.900 --> 01:54:19.900]  Generic, yeah.
[01:54:19.900 --> 01:54:21.900]  Yeah, so I just.
[01:54:21.900 --> 01:54:25.900]  Well, Michael should be glad to hear that.
[01:54:25.900 --> 01:54:26.900]  Yeah.
[01:54:26.900 --> 01:54:27.900]  All right.
[01:54:27.900 --> 01:54:28.900]  Well, I'll let you all go.
[01:54:28.900 --> 01:54:29.900]  I know you all have other callers.
[01:54:29.900 --> 01:54:31.900]  It was just nice talking to you all.
[01:54:31.900 --> 01:54:32.900]  Okay.
[01:54:32.900 --> 01:54:35.900]  Well, actually, you're the only caller left right now, so.
[01:54:35.900 --> 01:54:39.900]  Yeah, people will wait till five minutes, till ten, and then call in.
[01:54:39.900 --> 01:54:44.900]  Okay, Dominic, go ahead and ask me the hard question I can't answer.
[01:54:44.900 --> 01:54:47.900]  I don't have any hard questions.
[01:54:47.900 --> 01:54:53.900]  Dominic calls in and just blows my strategies away.
[01:54:53.900 --> 01:54:58.900]  Only Randy, only Randy.
[01:54:58.900 --> 01:54:59.900]  Well, it's good.
[01:54:59.900 --> 01:55:02.900]  He makes me better, keeps me on my toes.
[01:55:02.900 --> 01:55:06.900]  And to the previous caller that wanted to know what the case law that I was citing was,
[01:55:06.900 --> 01:55:11.900]  okay, it is Murdoch v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105.
[01:55:11.900 --> 01:55:18.900]  No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it.
[01:55:18.900 --> 01:55:24.900]  A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by a federal Constitution.
[01:55:24.900 --> 01:55:32.900]  Now, you've got several others, Miller v. United States, 230 Federal 2nd, 436, 489.
[01:55:32.900 --> 01:55:37.900]  The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime.
[01:55:37.900 --> 01:55:41.900]  Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516.
[01:55:41.900 --> 01:55:45.900]  The state cannot diminish rights of the people.
[01:55:45.900 --> 01:55:50.900]  Shearer v. Cullen, 481 Federal 945.
[01:55:50.900 --> 01:55:56.900]  There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of Constitutional rights.
[01:55:56.900 --> 01:56:02.900]  And then finally you have Shuttleworth v. Birmingham, 373 U.S. 262.
[01:56:02.900 --> 01:56:10.900]  If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity, okay?
[01:56:10.900 --> 01:56:16.900]  Lots of case law on that.
[01:56:16.900 --> 01:56:19.900]  Yeah, I kind of figured there would be on that one.
[01:56:19.900 --> 01:56:25.900]  But we need to bring that case law up and wave it in front of a lot of our judges.
[01:56:25.900 --> 01:56:30.900]  I'd rather be in front of them waving a two-by-four saying read it or weep.
[01:56:30.900 --> 01:56:33.900]  All right, we've got one more caller, Jim from Texas.
[01:56:33.900 --> 01:56:35.900]  I did have one final question.
[01:56:35.900 --> 01:56:36.900]  Okay, go ahead, Dominic.
[01:56:36.900 --> 01:56:40.900]  What happened to the morning show with Mr. Bush and Ms. Blair?
[01:56:40.900 --> 01:56:42.900]  I have a post about that on the website.
[01:56:42.900 --> 01:56:43.900]  Oh, I hadn't seen that.
[01:56:43.900 --> 01:56:45.900]  Okay, well, you all have a good evening.
[01:56:45.900 --> 01:56:46.900]  All right, thanks.
[01:56:46.900 --> 01:56:47.900]  Bye-bye.
[01:56:47.900 --> 01:56:49.900]  Well, we did have another caller on the line.
[01:56:49.900 --> 01:56:51.900]  There he is, Jim from Texas.
[01:56:51.900 --> 01:56:52.900]  Jim, thanks for calling in.
[01:56:52.900 --> 01:56:54.900]  What's on your mind tonight?
[01:56:54.900 --> 01:56:58.900]  I had a quick question about the Speedy Trial.
[01:56:58.900 --> 01:57:04.900]  Is that just really too ambiguous to use anyway?
[01:57:04.900 --> 01:57:08.900]  Well, you should request a Speedy Trial immediately.
[01:57:08.900 --> 01:57:13.900]  One of the first documents you file should be a demand for Speedy Trial.
[01:57:13.900 --> 01:57:21.900]  The prosecutor will claim that the Speedy Trial Act has been overturned, and it has.
[01:57:21.900 --> 01:57:24.900]  But the right to a Speedy Trial has not been overturned.
[01:57:24.900 --> 01:57:27.900]  It's still in the Constitution.
[01:57:27.900 --> 01:57:34.900]  So the courts will try to ignore it that if you don't claim, if you don't demand a Speedy Trial,
[01:57:34.900 --> 01:57:38.900]  then they will presume that you waive it.
[01:57:38.900 --> 01:57:47.900]  Well, I had a ticket that I responded to by mail, appeared by mail, asked for a trial,
[01:57:47.900 --> 01:57:52.900]  and it's just been ignored, and it's rocking on now in a year.
[01:57:52.900 --> 01:57:57.900]  File a motion to dismiss two older prosecutors.
[01:57:57.900 --> 01:57:58.900]  Okay.
[01:57:58.900 --> 01:58:01.900]  Most likely they'll do that, or else they'll try to, they'll say,
[01:58:01.900 --> 01:58:07.900]  oops, this one fell through the cracks, we need to try to go bust this guy's chops.
[01:58:07.900 --> 01:58:11.900]  In which case you need to just start beating him up.
[01:58:11.900 --> 01:58:15.900]  We've got lots of tools to beat him up with.
[01:58:15.900 --> 01:58:21.900]  Jerry and I were just writing some motions to do that today, and just having a great time.
[01:58:21.900 --> 01:58:22.900]  All right.
[01:58:22.900 --> 01:58:26.900]  Yeah, well, that'll get the pot stirred anyway.
[01:58:26.900 --> 01:58:27.900]  All right.
[01:58:27.900 --> 01:58:28.900]  Thank you, Jim.
[01:58:28.900 --> 01:58:29.900]  Thank you.
[01:58:29.900 --> 01:58:30.900]  Okay.
[01:58:30.900 --> 01:58:31.900]  We'll be back on Thursday night.
[01:58:31.900 --> 01:58:38.900]  We'll be back on the Rule of Law with Randy, Eddie, and Deborah, and tomorrow night we've got INN World Reports
[01:58:38.900 --> 01:58:42.900]  and the Agenda 21 Talk Show.
[01:58:42.900 --> 01:59:05.900]  We'll catch y'all later this week.
[01:59:12.900 --> 01:59:37.900]  Thank you very much.
[01:59:37.900 --> 01:59:58.900]  Thank you.