[00:00.000 --> 00:05.360]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[00:05.360 --> 00:11.040]  Barack Obama intends to raise $90 billion over the next decade through a special fee
[00:11.040 --> 00:13.740]  on the largest financial firms.
[00:13.740 --> 00:19.600]  The fee would apply to roughly 50 firms, each with at least $50 billion in assets.
[00:19.600 --> 00:26.540]  A robot that can help detect and disarm explosives is now in service at Boston's Logan Airport.
[00:26.540 --> 00:32.080]  The robot, developed by Black Eye Robotics, is funded by Congressional Appropriations.
[00:32.080 --> 00:38.840]  An Israeli company, We See You Technologies, is building a system that would project images
[00:38.840 --> 00:44.880]  onto airport screens, such as symbols associated with a certain terrorist group or an image
[00:44.880 --> 00:49.780]  only a terrorist would recognize, causing their reactions to be detected.
[00:49.780 --> 00:55.360]  We See You has received grants from the Transportation Security Administration and the Department
[00:55.360 --> 00:59.440]  of Homeland Security.
[00:59.440 --> 01:04.280]  Representative Jan Schakowsky, a member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence,
[01:04.280 --> 01:08.840]  is preparing to introduce legislation aimed at ending the government's relationship with
[01:08.840 --> 01:11.880]  Blackwater and other armed contractors.
[01:11.880 --> 01:17.300]  A national coalition of groups opposed to Blackwater has issued an open letter to Congress
[01:17.300 --> 01:23.360]  urging support for Schakowsky's SOS Act and have called on Congress to investigate the
[01:23.360 --> 01:28.800]  Justice Department's handling of the criminal case against the Blackwater operatives, alleged
[01:28.800 --> 01:33.240]  to have killed 14 Iraqis in the Nisour Square Massacre.
[01:33.240 --> 01:39.400]  On New Year's Eve, Federal Judge Ricardo Urbina threw out the case, alleging prosecutorial
[01:39.400 --> 01:40.560]  misconduct.
[01:40.560 --> 01:45.920]  Schakowsky noted, �These men and women are not part of the U.S. military or government,
[01:45.920 --> 01:51.560]  though their behavior has on numerous occasions severely damaged the credibility and security
[01:51.560 --> 01:55.520]  of our military and harmed our relationship with other governments.�
[01:55.520 --> 02:01.600]  This news brief brought to you by the International News Net.
[02:01.600 --> 02:07.840]  Congressman Dennis Kucinich wants to impose a 75 percent tax on the massive bonuses bankers
[02:07.840 --> 02:12.680]  are planning to pay themselves based on the windfall profits they earned from the taxpayer
[02:12.680 --> 02:13.680]  bailout.
[02:13.680 --> 02:16.920]  Tuesday, he introduced the Responsible Bankers Act.
[02:16.920 --> 02:22.800]  Kucinich, a leading critic of the government's unlimited support to Wall Street, remarked,
[02:22.800 --> 02:28.120]  �Bankers are preparing to pay themselves record bonuses rather than lending and investing
[02:28.120 --> 02:34.600]  in American economic prosperity.� Kucinich went on, �Bankers' failures to self-regulate
[02:34.600 --> 02:38.480]  were the direct cause of the crisis we are in today.
[02:38.480 --> 02:43.440]  They need to be told the money they are making is a public trust, not something they have
[02:43.440 --> 02:45.160]  earned for good behavior.�
[02:45.160 --> 02:51.080]  Kucinich added, �The aim of the federal policy is to give banks the opportunity to
[02:51.080 --> 02:56.120]  clean up the mess they have created, but the bank executives still don�t get it.
[02:56.120 --> 03:15.960]  They think the profits they are making are for themselves.�
[03:27.120 --> 03:37.960]  �I said, �Down, press the man!� �Where you gonna run to?� �Down, press the man!�
[03:37.960 --> 03:44.960]  �Tell me where you gonna run to?� �Down, press the man!�
[03:44.960 --> 03:55.960]  �I said, �Where you gonna run to?� �Long, a long body!�
[03:55.960 --> 04:07.700]  �Where you gonna run to?� �Down, press the man!�
[04:07.700 --> 04:20.820]  �Where you gonna run to?� �Long, a long body!�
[04:20.820 --> 04:28.700]  All right.
[04:28.700 --> 04:34.020]  When you run to the sea, it will be boiling down, Tresser man.
[04:34.020 --> 04:36.460]  Where are you going to run?
[04:36.460 --> 04:40.140]  Where are you going to hide when we come for you?
[04:40.140 --> 04:46.600]  Randy Kelton, Eddie Craig, Deborah Stevens, this is the rule of law.
[04:46.600 --> 04:49.820]  Got a whole bunch of material lined up for y'all tonight.
[04:49.820 --> 04:51.100]  I've got some stuff.
[04:51.100 --> 04:52.020]  Eddie's got stuff.
[04:52.020 --> 04:53.700]  Randy's got stuff.
[04:53.700 --> 05:01.060]  To start off with, I want to return to a topic that is very hot in the news
[05:01.060 --> 05:04.580]  lately, the naked body scanner machines.
[05:04.580 --> 05:08.660]  And to get back to the discussion from last Friday night when we had a very
[05:08.660 --> 05:14.420]  special guest, Phil, on, and I was mentioning the possibility of the back
[05:14.420 --> 05:19.780]  scatter machine coming to a neighborhood near you, well, it turns out I'm not
[05:19.780 --> 05:23.620]  such a conspiracy theorist, paranoid maniac after all.
[05:23.620 --> 05:27.060]  As it turns out, it's already here.
[05:27.060 --> 05:34.060]  The roaming, roving, back scatter vans coming to a neighborhood near you where
[05:34.060 --> 05:39.340]  they're going to drive down the street and shoot x-rays into your house and
[05:39.340 --> 05:43.660]  your car and see you naked in your house and everything in your house and
[05:43.660 --> 05:45.260]  everything that you're doing.
[05:45.260 --> 05:50.700]  So I wanted to start off by playing this very short clip, it's about two and a
[05:50.700 --> 05:55.460]  half minutes long, of basically this little infomercial.
[05:55.460 --> 06:00.420]  It's a sales pitch from a company called ASE or ASNE.
[06:00.420 --> 06:02.260]  We'll hear all about them.
[06:02.260 --> 06:08.260]  And they're roaming, roving, back scatter vans that they are trying to pitch to
[06:08.260 --> 06:12.860]  the government to sell, which I'm sure they've already bought plenty of them.
[06:12.860 --> 06:13.900]  So here we go.
[06:13.900 --> 06:19.300]  Without further ado, here's the laziest ad for the roaming, roving, back scatter
[06:19.300 --> 06:20.820]  van.
[06:20.820 --> 06:26.060]  The Z Backscatter Van from American Science and Engineering.
[06:26.060 --> 06:31.380]  From the outside, the ZVV looks like an ordinary delivery van, allowing it to
[06:31.380 --> 06:34.460]  blend in to urban and other landscapes.
[06:34.460 --> 06:39.380]  Yet, as it passes by cars, trucks, containers, and other objects, its
[06:39.380 --> 06:44.860]  unparalleled x-ray screening system provides photo-like images, detecting
[06:44.860 --> 06:49.260]  explosives, weapons, contraband, and stool weights.
[06:49.260 --> 06:54.420]  These images can be immediately analyzed by the operator seated in the ZVV's
[06:54.420 --> 06:56.060]  cab.
[06:56.060 --> 07:01.860]  The ZVV is the perfect screening tool for seaports, military bases, border
[07:01.860 --> 07:07.660]  crossings, checkpoints, and any other locations where illegal material or IEDs
[07:07.660 --> 07:12.420]  can be smuggled in via cars, trucks, or other vehicles.
[07:12.420 --> 07:18.060]  Using AS&E's unique back scatter technology, the ZVV produces electronically
[07:18.060 --> 07:23.300]  generated x-rays that detect substances containing low atomic number elements,
[07:23.300 --> 07:26.420]  such as carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen.
[07:26.420 --> 07:31.140]  These elements are often present in explosives and other contraband.
[07:31.140 --> 07:37.940]  The ZVV is an ideal tool for detecting these threats in vans, buses, cars,
[07:37.940 --> 07:43.260]  trucks, cargo containers, dumpsters, densely foliated trees and trucks, and
[07:43.260 --> 07:48.740]  any other object or containers where dangerous items can be concealed.
[07:48.740 --> 07:54.100]  The ZVV is not only incredibly effective, but also very easy to use.
[07:54.100 --> 07:58.420]  It can be operated by either one or two people, and is up and running
[07:58.420 --> 08:00.340]  within minutes.
[08:00.340 --> 08:04.820]  The operators can view the objects as they're being scanned, and by using
[08:04.820 --> 08:10.180]  AS&E's image analysis tools, they can manipulate, enhance, and save these
[08:10.180 --> 08:11.180]  images.
[08:11.180 --> 08:14.980]  The bottom line is that within minutes, your operator will know whether
[08:14.980 --> 08:18.700]  potentially dangerous materials are present.
[08:18.700 --> 08:23.340]  The ZVV provides still another important tool, radioactive threat
[08:23.340 --> 08:24.900]  detection.
[08:24.900 --> 08:29.580]  This feature can find both dirty bombs and nuclear devices.
[08:29.580 --> 08:34.180]  The ZVV is not only effective and mobile, but also safe.
[08:34.180 --> 08:38.260]  The radiation levels are very low, equivalent to the exposure passengers
[08:38.260 --> 08:42.860]  would receive if they flew in an airplane for 15 minutes.
[08:42.860 --> 08:47.700]  In summary, the ZVV is clearly the most effective screening vehicle on the
[08:47.700 --> 08:48.700]  market today.
[08:48.700 --> 08:53.380]  It's smaller, lighter, and safer than anything else available today, yet
[08:53.380 --> 08:58.300]  costs much less than other mobile x-ray screening systems.
[08:58.300 --> 09:04.980]  The ZVV, a solution for today's security officials.
[09:04.980 --> 09:14.580]  Okay, guys, there you have it from AS&E, the ZVV, the mobile back
[09:14.580 --> 09:18.820]  scatter machine coming to a neighborhood near you.
[09:18.820 --> 09:25.100]  And who knows how many times that van has driven up and down the street of
[09:25.100 --> 09:29.060]  my neighborhood, or yours for that matter.
[09:29.060 --> 09:35.500]  So now we've got to worry about these mobile back scatter machines driving all
[09:35.500 --> 09:40.940]  around and somehow be able to put up radiation detection systems on our
[09:40.940 --> 09:47.860]  properties to alarm and alert us when something like this could be going on.
[09:47.860 --> 09:53.700]  And this raises a number of questions here that I have for you guys, Eddie
[09:53.700 --> 09:55.620]  and Randy.
[09:55.620 --> 10:03.100]  One of them is, they mention in this ad something about radiation levels
[10:03.100 --> 10:07.060]  equivalent to being on an airplane for 15 minutes.
[10:07.060 --> 10:12.180]  I didn't realize that we were subjected to any kind of radiation levels just
[10:12.180 --> 10:15.940]  by being on an airplane, so I was curious about that.
[10:15.940 --> 10:21.820]  And it also raises another question I happened to hear on one of the other
[10:21.820 --> 10:26.460]  talkshow, Alex Jones show the other day, I think it was yesterday, a gentleman
[10:26.460 --> 10:30.420]  mentioning that they have the back scatter machines now as part of the
[10:30.420 --> 10:35.860]  standard security protocol in the Denver County Courthouse.
[10:35.860 --> 10:38.340]  And so this raises another question.
[10:38.340 --> 10:43.540]  It's not just for airports anymore, but it's now coming to a courthouse near
[10:43.540 --> 10:46.980]  you, and not just a federal courthouse, but a county courthouse.
[10:46.980 --> 10:53.580]  So what happens when someone like me gets a jury summons for jury duty, or
[10:53.580 --> 10:59.260]  perhaps a subpoena, or maybe if I'm a plaintiff in a lawsuit like I am now in
[10:59.260 --> 11:02.580]  several lawsuits, and it's time to go to court?
[11:02.580 --> 11:06.980]  And lo and behold, here's the naked body scanner machine, and I ain't going to
[11:06.980 --> 11:08.260]  go through it.
[11:08.260 --> 11:09.940]  And so what's going to happen?
[11:09.940 --> 11:13.580]  Am I going to be held in contempt of court for not answering the jury
[11:13.580 --> 11:17.780]  summons, or held in contempt of court for not answering the subpoena?
[11:17.780 --> 11:22.140]  Well, I tell you what, I'll sue the judge, I'll sue the court, I'll sue anybody
[11:22.140 --> 11:26.860]  and everybody and say, look, I showed up for the subpoena, I showed up for the
[11:26.860 --> 11:31.260]  jury summons, I'm here, but I ain't going through your back scatter naked
[11:31.260 --> 11:33.020]  body scanner machine.
[11:33.020 --> 11:37.180]  Now, Randy and I were discussing this yesterday, and he said, well, just wear
[11:37.180 --> 11:41.260]  the little tag, the radiation detection tag, and tell the security, if this
[11:41.260 --> 11:44.220]  thing goes off, I will sue you for radiation exposure.
[11:44.220 --> 11:47.300]  Well, that may be Randy's remedy, but I'm not even going to go that far,
[11:47.300 --> 11:51.700]  because I'm not going to go through it, period.
[11:51.700 --> 11:54.420]  So what I want to know is, what is the remedy?
[11:54.420 --> 11:57.500]  What kind of criminal charges can we file against whom?
[11:57.500 --> 12:01.580]  And what kind of lawsuits can we file against whom for someone like me who
[12:01.580 --> 12:06.340]  would show up for a subpoena, or show up for jury summons, but say, hey, buddy,
[12:06.340 --> 12:09.780]  I ain't going through your machine, and no, you're not going to pat me down
[12:09.780 --> 12:10.620]  either.
[12:10.620 --> 12:14.540]  So either let me go, or I guess throw me in jail for contempt of court.
[12:14.540 --> 12:15.340]  I don't know.
[12:15.340 --> 12:20.780]  So guys, what do y'all think about this?
[12:20.780 --> 12:21.620]  Guy?
[12:21.620 --> 12:24.740]  I could volunteer for the pat down.
[12:24.740 --> 12:29.540]  You could, but I'm not.
[12:29.540 --> 12:33.260]  I mean, would someone like me actually be in contempt of court?
[12:33.260 --> 12:37.020]  I showed up.
[12:37.020 --> 12:38.540]  That's a good question.
[12:38.540 --> 12:39.740]  Yeah, I wouldn't.
[12:39.740 --> 12:44.500]  It would be want me, or sign this saying that I arrived,
[12:44.500 --> 12:46.740]  but you guys denied me entry, because I would not
[12:46.740 --> 12:51.980]  let you barbecue me with your radiation projecting device.
[12:51.980 --> 12:55.140]  I like that.
[12:55.140 --> 12:58.020]  I was invited to court, not a barbecue.
[12:58.020 --> 13:01.940]  Exactly, especially as the main course.
[13:01.940 --> 13:02.420]  Exactly.
[13:02.420 --> 13:11.500]  Well, I suspect this is going to raise a pretty loud cry.
[13:11.500 --> 13:16.500]  And this nonsense of there being no more radiation than you to get in an airplane
[13:16.500 --> 13:18.500]  for 15 minutes is horse poopy.
[13:18.500 --> 13:21.500]  Yeah, what is this radiation when you're in an airplane for 15 minutes?
[13:21.500 --> 13:23.500]  What is that all about?
[13:23.500 --> 13:24.500]  Beats me.
[13:24.500 --> 13:26.500]  I don't know of anything other than that.
[13:26.500 --> 13:28.500]  Randy's a pilot, so I mean, if anybody should know.
[13:28.500 --> 13:34.500]  Well, basically speaking, in any form of energy that is detectable
[13:34.500 --> 13:37.500]  is emitting some type of radiation, the point being whether or not
[13:37.500 --> 13:39.500]  it's ionizing radiation.
[13:39.500 --> 13:41.500]  No, that's not it.
[13:41.500 --> 13:47.500]  High frequency non-ionizing, ultra-high frequency non-ionizing radiation,
[13:47.500 --> 13:50.500]  that's what the article that I read the other day said,
[13:50.500 --> 13:53.500]  that it is as harmful as ionizing radiation.
[13:53.500 --> 13:54.500]  Yeah, they're trying.
[13:54.500 --> 13:56.500]  And jet planes produce that.
[13:56.500 --> 13:59.500]  And jet planes produce that in huge quantities.
[13:59.500 --> 14:03.500]  That's probably what they're talking about because they're trying to say
[14:03.500 --> 14:09.500]  that this is non-ionizing radiation, so it's OK.
[14:09.500 --> 14:16.500]  No, you're talking about the engine is throwing out gigahertz EMF.
[14:16.500 --> 14:18.500]  You didn't say EMF.
[14:18.500 --> 14:22.500]  That's what radiation is, electromagnetic radiation.
[14:22.500 --> 14:24.500]  That's what we're talking about.
[14:24.500 --> 14:26.500]  Not necessarily.
[14:26.500 --> 14:29.500]  High frequency can be other forms of radiation that are harmful to you.
[14:29.500 --> 14:32.500]  Well, sound, we're not talking about sound.
[14:32.500 --> 14:36.500]  We're talking about a transmitted EMF.
[14:36.500 --> 14:38.500]  But the engines still operate on the same thing.
[14:38.500 --> 14:41.500]  They're fueled, but...
[14:41.500 --> 14:46.500]  There would have to be something in the engine to create a transmitting source.
[14:46.500 --> 14:52.500]  Now, they'll certainly radiate sound vibration, but not in the gigahertz range.
[14:52.500 --> 14:53.500]  There's nothing in there.
[14:53.500 --> 14:54.500]  This isn't about sound.
[14:54.500 --> 14:56.500]  This is about energy.
[14:56.500 --> 14:58.500]  Yeah, you've got your communications arrays
[14:58.500 --> 15:02.500]  and everything else that are on these aircraft.
[15:02.500 --> 15:06.500]  I mean, there's all kinds of things on these aircraft that emit EMF radiation,
[15:06.500 --> 15:09.500]  which is very sensitive EMF radiation to boot,
[15:09.500 --> 15:13.500]  which is exactly why they don't want you having electronic devices on
[15:13.500 --> 15:18.500]  during takeoff and landing, because it interferes with their devices.
[15:18.500 --> 15:22.500]  Well, they have the onboard radar, but that's a directional EMF.
[15:22.500 --> 15:25.500]  You're not going to get that back behind it.
[15:25.500 --> 15:29.500]  Now, you'd certainly get toasted in front of it.
[15:29.500 --> 15:33.500]  Well, the whole thing sounds like a lame excuse to me.
[15:33.500 --> 15:37.500]  And the rest of it would go to radio communication.
[15:37.500 --> 15:41.500]  And for the most part, radio communication is not ultra-high frequency
[15:41.500 --> 15:48.500]  unless the guys in the cockpit are using a cell phone.
[15:48.500 --> 15:52.500]  There are frequencies allotted to the airwaves.
[15:52.500 --> 15:53.500]  Well, it's no excuse.
[15:53.500 --> 15:54.500]  It's no excuse.
[15:54.500 --> 15:57.500]  It's a lame excuse, any which way you slice it,
[15:57.500 --> 16:01.500]  because even if it's non-ionizing radiation,
[16:01.500 --> 16:06.500]  there is plenty of scientific evidence to show that even non-ionizing radiation
[16:06.500 --> 16:09.500]  can be just as harmful as ionizing radiation.
[16:09.500 --> 16:15.500]  I mean, they are literally wanting to drive down the street
[16:15.500 --> 16:20.500]  and fry us all with X-rays and gamma rays.
[16:20.500 --> 16:21.500]  What the heck?
[16:21.500 --> 16:23.500]  In our own homes?
[16:23.500 --> 16:27.500]  Aside from that, the courts have already ruled on these infrared detectors
[16:27.500 --> 16:31.500]  that they could locate you in your house.
[16:31.500 --> 16:34.500]  The courts have ruled that they cannot use that
[16:34.500 --> 16:38.500]  unless they have sufficient probable cause for a search warrant.
[16:38.500 --> 16:40.500]  Okay, well, listen, we're going to break.
[16:40.500 --> 16:41.500]  We have a caller.
[16:41.500 --> 16:45.500]  As far as the backscatter machines in the courthouse,
[16:45.500 --> 16:46.500]  I just got a Skype chat.
[16:46.500 --> 16:47.500]  My call screener says,
[16:47.500 --> 16:54.500]  let the attorney in front of me go through twice and let him have his turn.
[16:54.500 --> 17:00.500]  Okay, we'll be right back, and we're going to go to Dominic in Texas.
[17:00.500 --> 17:03.500]  Do you feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics?
[17:03.500 --> 17:04.500]  Sorry.
[17:04.500 --> 17:07.500]  Are you confused by words like the Constitution or the Federal Reserve?
[17:07.500 --> 17:08.500]  What?
[17:08.500 --> 17:12.500]  No, you may be diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today, stupidity.
[17:12.500 --> 17:16.500]  Hi, my name is Steve Holt, and like millions of other Americans,
[17:16.500 --> 17:19.500]  I was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age.
[17:19.500 --> 17:22.500]  I had no idea that the number one cause of the disease
[17:22.500 --> 17:25.500]  is found in almost every home in America, the television.
[17:25.500 --> 17:29.500]  Unfortunately, that puts most Americans at risk of catching stupidity,
[17:29.500 --> 17:30.500]  but there is hope.
[17:30.500 --> 17:32.500]  The staff at Brave New Books have helped me
[17:32.500 --> 17:36.500]  and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism recover,
[17:36.500 --> 17:38.500]  and because of Brave New Books, I now enjoy reading
[17:38.500 --> 17:43.500]  and watching educational documentaries without feeling tired or uninterested.
[17:43.500 --> 17:46.500]  So if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity,
[17:46.500 --> 17:50.500]  then you need to call 512-480-2503
[17:50.500 --> 17:54.500]  or visit them at 1904Guadalupe or bravenewbookstore.com.
[17:54.500 --> 17:56.500]  Side effects from using Brave New Books products
[17:56.500 --> 17:58.500]  may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary
[17:58.500 --> 18:17.500]  and overall increase in mental functioning.
[18:17.500 --> 18:21.500]  All right, we asked the questions, but they don't have the answers.
[18:21.500 --> 18:25.500]  I like Eddie's answer, though, about what would someone like me do
[18:25.500 --> 18:30.500]  if I showed up for a subpoena or jury summons and refused to go through.
[18:30.500 --> 18:32.500]  I like that answer, Eddie.
[18:32.500 --> 18:36.500]  Make them sign the paper saying they refuse to allow entry.
[18:36.500 --> 18:39.500]  Okay, so we're going to go to Dominic in Texas.
[18:39.500 --> 18:43.500]  Dominic, what is your comments and thoughts on this issue?
[18:43.500 --> 18:46.500]  Well, Randy or Eddie touched on it.
[18:46.500 --> 18:49.500]  What good is it to have their backscatter vans
[18:49.500 --> 18:56.500]  if anything that they get is without a search warrant and it's inadmissible?
[18:56.500 --> 18:58.500]  Well, it may not necessarily be that they're out looking
[18:58.500 --> 19:00.500]  to create the need for a search warrant.
[19:00.500 --> 19:03.500]  They're looking to sterilize the general population
[19:03.500 --> 19:06.500]  they wish to breed out of existence for the elitist crew.
[19:06.500 --> 19:09.500]  Yeah, and they're also looking to just have general surveillance
[19:09.500 --> 19:14.500]  to know what anybody and everybody is doing all the time
[19:14.500 --> 19:19.500]  so that they can take covert actions or reactions.
[19:19.500 --> 19:24.500]  I mean, most of what they do is not going to be above board or on the books.
[19:24.500 --> 19:29.500]  They want to take, you know, make covert reactions.
[19:29.500 --> 19:33.500]  They just want to know what's going on so they can react to it,
[19:33.500 --> 19:38.500]  and it's not necessarily going to be for a lawful purpose.
[19:38.500 --> 19:41.500]  Yeah, but it falls too much into invasion of privacy,
[19:41.500 --> 19:45.500]  and is there going to be a way to find out where they've been or where they're going?
[19:45.500 --> 19:46.500]  That's the whole point.
[19:46.500 --> 19:48.500]  That's why I brought up this issue.
[19:48.500 --> 19:54.500]  We're going to have to have radiation detection devices on our properties now
[19:54.500 --> 19:59.500]  that will set off alarms so that we'll know when they're driving down the street
[19:59.500 --> 20:03.500]  blasting us with radiation now.
[20:03.500 --> 20:07.500]  Yeah, because if they drive by and kill somebody with a pacemaker,
[20:07.500 --> 20:12.500]  all they're going to say, well, we weren't there.
[20:12.500 --> 20:15.500]  There has to be some accountability.
[20:15.500 --> 20:17.500]  Yeah, they will call that collateral damage.
[20:17.500 --> 20:23.500]  The thing I'm concerned about is they will use this to find out how to go find
[20:23.500 --> 20:25.500]  something that appears incriminating,
[20:25.500 --> 20:29.500]  and they'll never indicate that they used an illegal device,
[20:29.500 --> 20:32.500]  just like the information we got out of Cherokee County
[20:32.500 --> 20:39.500]  and the feds have made digital recording, telephone recording equipment
[20:39.500 --> 20:45.500]  available to the police so that the police can do their dirty work for them
[20:45.500 --> 20:49.500]  and give the information back to the feds,
[20:49.500 --> 20:54.500]  and they don't have to admit where it came from.
[20:54.500 --> 21:01.500]  So here they could develop information illegally and never have to admit where they got it.
[21:01.500 --> 21:04.500]  It's kind of like with the fusion centers.
[21:04.500 --> 21:06.500]  It's almost the exact same thing.
[21:06.500 --> 21:12.500]  It's just information and data mining, data gathering.
[21:12.500 --> 21:15.500]  So basically there is going to be no recourse.
[21:15.500 --> 21:17.500]  They're going to do whatever.
[21:17.500 --> 21:24.500]  I do have a recourse, and it goes to pulse technology.
[21:24.500 --> 21:30.500]  We could build a transmitter that would fry that thing right where it's sitting.
[21:30.500 --> 21:34.500]  Yeah, but then risk getting charged for terrorism, for destroying...
[21:34.500 --> 21:37.500]  That's why you use pulse technology.
[21:37.500 --> 21:39.500]  Bam!
[21:39.500 --> 21:41.500]  And all of a sudden it just goes out.
[21:41.500 --> 21:43.500]  Well, I mean, I have a recourse, too.
[21:43.500 --> 21:49.500]  I mean, radiation detection devices are pretty cheap these days.
[21:49.500 --> 21:54.500]  You have to have video cameras, you know, around the front of your property
[21:54.500 --> 21:58.500]  and radiation detection device, hook them up together
[21:58.500 --> 22:04.500]  so that in case you're not at home, if the radiation detection device goes off,
[22:04.500 --> 22:06.500]  boom, it sets off the video camera to record,
[22:06.500 --> 22:09.500]  which it should probably be recording 24-7 anyway,
[22:09.500 --> 22:13.500]  and that way you record the van that drives by, you know,
[22:13.500 --> 22:17.500]  can zoom in on the guy's face or whoever and the license plate, too,
[22:17.500 --> 22:24.500]  and you go after them for blasting you with harmful radiation.
[22:24.500 --> 22:28.500]  Because there's nothing on the van indicating when it's in use
[22:28.500 --> 22:30.500]  and when it's just driving around, correct?
[22:30.500 --> 22:33.500]  There's probably nothing on the van indicating what it is.
[22:33.500 --> 22:36.500]  There's nothing on the van indicating what it is either.
[22:36.500 --> 22:40.500]  So, I mean, you can, folks, you can go and find this on YouTube,
[22:40.500 --> 22:44.500]  and it's also on Michael Rivero's site, whatreallyhappened.com.
[22:44.500 --> 22:46.500]  That's where I found this anyway.
[22:46.500 --> 22:47.500]  Oh.
[22:47.500 --> 22:49.500]  Because I'm looking at it.
[22:49.500 --> 22:53.500]  There is...does have some trying to pull it up.
[22:53.500 --> 22:57.500]  It looks like a refrigerated van or something.
[22:57.500 --> 23:04.500]  I mean, they're trying to pitch this to government installations,
[23:04.500 --> 23:10.500]  you know, military bases and ports and airports and things like that,
[23:10.500 --> 23:15.500]  but you know they're going to be driving them around all over the place.
[23:15.500 --> 23:19.500]  So I'm just bringing this up to folks' attention.
[23:19.500 --> 23:22.500]  You know, we're going to have to be on the alert here.
[23:22.500 --> 23:26.500]  We're going to have to have radiation detection systems on our properties,
[23:26.500 --> 23:29.500]  on our bodies, you know, have them in their pocket
[23:29.500 --> 23:36.500]  so that you'll know when they're trying to blast you,
[23:36.500 --> 23:42.500]  have video cameras so that you can film it and go after them in court, sue them,
[23:42.500 --> 23:44.500]  file criminal charges, the whole nine yards.
[23:44.500 --> 23:48.500]  If enough people stand up to this, they will stop it.
[23:48.500 --> 23:50.500]  They'll have to.
[23:50.500 --> 23:52.500]  It's going to be a health hazard.
[23:52.500 --> 23:54.500]  It's not going to fly.
[23:54.500 --> 23:58.500]  It's not going to fly, not to mention I am sure all of these devices
[23:58.500 --> 24:04.500]  are just fraught with FCC violations anyway.
[24:04.500 --> 24:07.500]  Yeah, because I'm with you, Deborah, also on the backscatter machines
[24:07.500 --> 24:12.500]  and airports and in courts and all that, you know.
[24:12.500 --> 24:17.500]  It's not that much that, you know, if I would say, oh, I don't mind me going through it,
[24:17.500 --> 24:21.500]  it's just a precedent because later on then my wife would have to go through it
[24:21.500 --> 24:24.500]  because, you know, I've already allowed it to happen.
[24:24.500 --> 24:27.500]  And then, you know, later on, kids.
[24:27.500 --> 24:33.500]  So it needs to be stopped at, you know, a certain point.
[24:33.500 --> 24:36.500]  Yeah, we need the badges.
[24:36.500 --> 24:39.500]  We need to get a concession on the badges and start selling those.
[24:39.500 --> 24:40.500]  Absolutely.
[24:40.500 --> 24:45.500]  If I walk into a court room, courthouse, and my badge changes colors,
[24:45.500 --> 24:57.500]  I'm going to call the feds and claim a radiation leak.
[24:57.500 --> 24:58.500]  Call hazmat.
[24:58.500 --> 25:01.500]  Oh, this happened at Los Alamos.
[25:01.500 --> 25:09.500]  Los Alamos National Laboratories, a truck driver hauling rebar got lost.
[25:09.500 --> 25:13.500]  And he pulled up to the gate and he said, guys, I'm lost.
[25:13.500 --> 25:15.500]  And he told them where he wanted to go. They gave him directions.
[25:15.500 --> 25:17.500]  He said, now, how do I get out of here?
[25:17.500 --> 25:20.500]  They said, just pull in the gate and right there's a turnaround.
[25:20.500 --> 25:21.500]  You can go back out.
[25:21.500 --> 25:29.500]  He pulled in the gate and set off the radiation detectors and the place went bananas.
[25:29.500 --> 25:38.500]  It turned into the one of the largest scandals in U.S. history.
[25:38.500 --> 25:47.500]  It took five years to figure it out, but a company in California sold an X-ray machine.
[25:47.500 --> 25:51.500]  They repaired X-ray machines and they had an old one.
[25:51.500 --> 25:57.500]  They sold it to a scrap dealer who sold it to a scrap dealer in Mexico.
[25:57.500 --> 26:06.500]  They took it to old Mexico, dismantled it, and didn't properly dispose of the metal that was in it.
[26:06.500 --> 26:10.500]  Dumped it in the scrap bin and melted it down.
[26:10.500 --> 26:15.500]  And now, if you go into half of the federal buildings around the country,
[26:15.500 --> 26:21.500]  we'll set off a Geiger counter because they're all made with radioactive rebar.
[26:21.500 --> 26:22.500]  Nice.
[26:22.500 --> 26:34.500]  One X-ray machine got – had so – it was – the radiation potential there was so great
[26:34.500 --> 26:39.500]  that it contaminated buildings all over the country.
[26:39.500 --> 26:42.500]  So we're talking about a big deal here.
[26:42.500 --> 26:45.500]  Radiation is really bad news.
[26:45.500 --> 26:46.500]  It's not going to fly.
[26:46.500 --> 26:48.500]  They're not going to be able to do it.
[26:48.500 --> 26:49.500]  We just have to stand up to it.
[26:49.500 --> 26:53.500]  We've got to do it now before everybody gets sterilized
[26:53.500 --> 26:57.500]  and their DNA gets ripped apart like a zipper.
[26:57.500 --> 27:01.500]  Yeah, I think Tony Davis has radiation poisoning.
[27:01.500 --> 27:04.500]  His hair is falling out.
[27:04.500 --> 27:06.500]  What, from being around federal buildings too much?
[27:06.500 --> 27:09.500]  Yeah, I think that's what it is.
[27:09.500 --> 27:10.500]  My brother, his hair is falling out.
[27:10.500 --> 27:12.500]  He's probably got radiation poisoning.
[27:12.500 --> 27:13.500]  Yeah, what's your excuse?
[27:13.500 --> 27:14.500]  I'm just kidding.
[27:14.500 --> 27:17.500]  Actually, Randy has a full head of hair.
[27:17.500 --> 27:18.500]  Well, I'm going to drop off.
[27:18.500 --> 27:20.500]  I'm going to let somebody else get on the line now.
[27:20.500 --> 27:21.500]  You all have a good evening.
[27:21.500 --> 27:22.500]  I'll chime in later on.
[27:22.500 --> 27:23.500]  All right.
[27:23.500 --> 27:24.500]  Thanks, Dominic.
[27:24.500 --> 27:25.500]  Thank you.
[27:25.500 --> 27:27.500]  Bye-bye.
[27:27.500 --> 27:34.500]  Okay, moving on, unless you guys have any more comments.
[27:34.500 --> 27:36.500]  Not on this issue.
[27:36.500 --> 27:41.500]  I wanted to talk about Title V concerning the FCC.
[27:41.500 --> 27:45.500]  Speaking of the FCC, this is something I wanted to get to last Thursday
[27:45.500 --> 27:48.500]  but didn't get a chance to.
[27:48.500 --> 27:57.500]  One of the many violations that these alleged purported FCC agents have made
[27:57.500 --> 28:03.500]  in all of their antics concerning low-power FMs as of late
[28:03.500 --> 28:14.500]  is very clear violations of Title V, which has to do with administrative rulings.
[28:14.500 --> 28:20.500]  There are very clear laws that govern how federal agencies can conduct
[28:20.500 --> 28:28.500]  investigations and hand down administrative rulings, such as forfeitures, et cetera.
[28:28.500 --> 28:31.500]  I wanted to get a little bit into this because actually,
[28:31.500 --> 28:41.500]  Title V really lays it out nice as far as the rules that govern how they can operate.
[28:41.500 --> 28:47.500]  It's very clear that there has to be a separation between agents that act
[28:47.500 --> 28:52.500]  in an adjudicatory capacity and agents that act in an investigative
[28:52.500 --> 28:55.500]  or prosecutorial capacity.
[28:55.500 --> 29:02.500]  Any time that there is any information exchanged between the two,
[29:02.500 --> 29:07.500]  there has to be an administrative hearing.
[29:07.500 --> 29:13.500]  The accused has to be notified and involved in the hearing,
[29:13.500 --> 29:19.500]  and information and evidence cannot be submitted from the prosecutorial agent
[29:19.500 --> 29:25.500]  to the adjudicatory agent unless it's in a hearing,
[29:25.500 --> 29:33.500]  and the accused has to be present, just like the judicial branch of our government.
[29:33.500 --> 29:39.500]  Our founders and subsequent legislators really set up the law very nicely,
[29:39.500 --> 29:44.500]  even down to the inner workings of administrative agencies
[29:44.500 --> 29:48.500]  that have the power to make administrative rulings
[29:48.500 --> 29:52.500]  that affect people's rights and property.
[29:52.500 --> 29:55.500]  So we're going to get into that on the other side.
[29:55.500 --> 29:56.500]  We will be right back.
[29:56.500 --> 30:00.500]  This is the rule of law.
[30:00.500 --> 30:03.500]  Are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit?
[30:03.500 --> 30:06.500]  Win your case without an attorney with Jurisdictionary,
[30:06.500 --> 30:10.500]  the affordable, easy-to-understand 4-CD course
[30:10.500 --> 30:14.500]  that will show you how in 24 hours, step-by-step.
[30:14.500 --> 30:18.500]  If you have a lawyer, know what your lawyer should be doing.
[30:18.500 --> 30:22.500]  If you don't have a lawyer, know what you should do for yourself.
[30:22.500 --> 30:27.500]  Thousands have won with our step-by-step course, and now you can too.
[30:27.500 --> 30:30.500]  Jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[30:30.500 --> 30:33.500]  with 22 years of case-winning experience.
[30:33.500 --> 30:38.500]  Even if you're not in a lawsuit, you can learn what everyone should understand
[30:38.500 --> 30:42.500]  about the principles and practices that control our American courts.
[30:42.500 --> 30:47.500]  You'll receive our audio classroom, video seminar, tutorials,
[30:47.500 --> 30:51.500]  forms for civil cases, pro se tactics, and much more.
[30:51.500 --> 30:55.500]  Please visit ruleoflawradio.com and click on the banner
[30:55.500 --> 31:00.500]  or call toll-free 866-LAW-EZ.
[31:00.500 --> 31:27.500] ...
[31:30.500 --> 31:34.500]  When you're going to stop abuse, you'll power
[31:34.500 --> 31:39.500]  When you're going to stop abuse, you'll power
[31:39.500 --> 31:45.500]  When you're going to stop abuse, you'll power
[31:45.500 --> 31:50.500]  So please Mr. Mackle and teach officers not to abuse the power
[31:50.500 --> 31:56.500]  Send a request to the leaders and captain of all officers
[31:56.500 --> 32:01.500]  Tell them to uphold the law or please don't abuse their power
[32:01.500 --> 32:07.500]  They beat and they beat and they cheat and they cheat and they lie every hour
[32:07.500 --> 32:12.500]  So Mr. Officer, please stop abusing your power
[32:12.500 --> 32:18.500]  You pull me over and tell me be silent, sir
[32:18.500 --> 32:23.500]  I need to speak to my lawyer, Mr. Officer
[32:23.500 --> 32:28.500]  You acting like you under judge finding me guilty sir
[32:28.500 --> 32:34.500]  So when you're going to stop abuse, you'll power
[32:34.500 --> 32:40.500]  When you're going to stop abuse, you'll power
[32:40.500 --> 32:45.500]  When you're going to stop abuse, you'll power
[32:45.500 --> 32:52.500]  When you're going to stop abuse, you'll power
[32:52.500 --> 32:54.500]  Okay, we are back
[32:55.020 --> 32:57.660]  Okay, Randy and I are going to break it down for you
[32:57.980 --> 33:03.200]  We're going to read some sections from this petition that just got filed in the Federal
[33:04.100 --> 33:07.620]  Circuit Court of Appeals in the Fifth Circuit here in New Orleans
[33:09.060 --> 33:15.660]  So Randy you wanted to read some sections from the petition to preface and then I'm going to go over some sections of title five
[33:15.660 --> 33:21.580]  And then how it applies to the situation at hand and how the title five was violated. So go ahead
[33:21.580 --> 33:26.420]  Yeah, I'm going to start out by kind of walking down on how we put the
[33:27.580 --> 33:29.500]  document together
[33:29.500 --> 33:31.500]  We do the standard stuff the
[33:32.260 --> 33:34.260]  jurisdiction venue parties
[33:35.060 --> 33:36.660]  discovery
[33:36.660 --> 33:38.500]  And then we go down
[33:38.500 --> 33:46.100]  The first thing we do is a statement of cause Stephen Lee Dennis Cartland subjected plaintiff to to denial of due course of constitutional laws
[33:46.100 --> 33:49.260]  in the United States and thereby denied plaintiff and constitutional and
[33:49.260 --> 33:51.260]  statutory rights
[33:51.620 --> 33:56.180]  thereby subjecting plaintiff to monetary loss physical distress and severe mental anguish
[33:56.980 --> 34:03.060]  By committing criminal trespass on the private property plaintiff exerting or purporting exerting authority
[34:03.060 --> 34:07.700]  They did not have failing to prove up jurisdiction once jurisdiction is challenged
[34:08.100 --> 34:12.740]  Claiming to act under authority of Federal Communications Commission's when they had no such authority
[34:12.740 --> 34:20.220]  Claiming authority to restrict the free will of one of the people through threats and intimidation exerted under color of non-existent
[34:20.740 --> 34:26.380]  Official authority and by violating rules of the Commission while claiming to act under authority of the Commission
[34:27.340 --> 34:30.220]  This tells the judge what we're going to tell him
[34:31.060 --> 34:38.620]  And then we maintain that the forfeiture was invalid the forfeiture claimed by Lee and Carlton should be dismissed with the following following reasons
[34:38.620 --> 34:45.820]  Lee and Carl Carlton lacked jurisdiction to act in the name and unauthority Commission Lee and Carlton violated rules of the Commission
[34:46.380 --> 34:52.860]  They Lee and Carlton failed to prove plaintiff violated 47 CFR 15.239
[34:54.460 --> 35:03.580]  47 USC section 301 section 503 and 554 and this is what we are prepared to prove up
[35:03.580 --> 35:10.540]  Are prepared to prove up and then we give judicial notice of all of the laws that we'll be referencing
[35:11.980 --> 35:15.660]  And here's where we talk about the missing or the
[35:17.340 --> 35:20.700]  The oath of office that's bogus
[35:21.420 --> 35:27.020]  Where they sent us an oath of office that wasn't any good. So that gave us reason to believe that they weren't officers
[35:27.020 --> 35:33.580]  So steven and then we go down to arguments in support of dismissal of forfeiture. Oh wait, but I just want to interrupt here
[35:34.220 --> 35:36.700]  more foyers have been coming in and
[35:37.740 --> 35:39.180]  Get this
[35:39.180 --> 35:41.180]  One that came in yesterday
[35:41.500 --> 35:45.500]  I foiled information on the guy who signed
[35:47.020 --> 35:51.900]  Claiming to be a notary even though there was no verification no stamp and no date and no nothing
[35:52.300 --> 35:54.700]  I wanted information on that guy
[35:54.700 --> 35:57.900]  And that's he told me that he was never an employee
[35:59.260 --> 36:02.300]  Of the lcc. So where did this guy come from?
[36:02.780 --> 36:09.420]  His name was daniel oland tree. He was he was the guy who signed on the line where it said notary signature
[36:09.980 --> 36:11.980]  Where did this guy come from?
[36:11.980 --> 36:15.740]  That'll be interesting. Yeah, exactly. Okay, so continue on. Okay
[36:17.260 --> 36:19.260]  Isn't that a violation of state law?
[36:19.260 --> 36:27.020]  Isn't that a violation of state law? Oh, everything is a violation of state law until they prove up subject matter jurisdiction
[36:27.260 --> 36:31.340]  Well, don't talk about impersonating a notary who is a state official
[36:31.820 --> 36:33.580]  well
[36:33.580 --> 36:36.220]  this daniel oland tree guy may actually be a
[36:37.980 --> 36:40.300]  Notary, but we don't know but
[36:41.340 --> 36:45.820]  It it's he certainly was not an fcc employee because that's what the scc told us
[36:45.820 --> 36:50.640]  Yeah, okay, then we go on to stephen lee failed to prove up jurisdiction
[36:51.980 --> 36:53.980]  I quoted
[36:54.380 --> 36:56.380]  Federal crop insurance v. Merrill
[36:56.940 --> 37:01.020]  And everyone should be should have this one ingrained in their mind
[37:01.820 --> 37:05.260]  Government is not partly public and partly private
[37:05.740 --> 37:13.260]  Depending upon the governmental pedigree of the type of a particular activity or the manner in which the government conducts it
[37:13.260 --> 37:20.300]  It the government may carry on its operations through conventional executive agencies or through corporate forms
[37:20.760 --> 37:23.260]  especially created for defined ends
[37:23.900 --> 37:26.460]  Whatever the form in which the government functions
[37:27.260 --> 37:35.340]  Anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who
[37:35.720 --> 37:40.220]  Proports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority
[37:40.220 --> 37:47.440]  The scope of this authority may be explicitly defined by congress or be limited by the delegated legislation
[37:47.820 --> 37:50.620]  properly exercised through the rulemaking power
[37:51.500 --> 37:54.380]  This is the grounds we stand on
[37:55.340 --> 37:57.340]  Who the heck are you?
[37:57.980 --> 38:00.720]  You're telling us you have this authority
[38:01.340 --> 38:08.140]  Show me what authority you have where you got it and to the the extent to which you can exercise it
[38:08.140 --> 38:09.420]  And
[38:09.420 --> 38:16.220]  Plaintiff has a right to be sure a person making a claim of authority has the authority claimed
[38:16.620 --> 38:18.620]  I'm, sorry. This is this is our writing
[38:19.420 --> 38:24.940]  Lee when his jurisdiction was challenged simply ignored the challenge issued and issued
[38:25.820 --> 38:32.060]  An adjudication against plaintiff. Well, actually no randy you're reading from an old version
[38:32.460 --> 38:35.740]  we never challenged the jurisdiction of lee because
[38:35.740 --> 38:39.820]  Uh individual agents cannot have jurisdiction only the governmental okay
[38:39.820 --> 38:42.460]  I don't want to go into all of those minutiae arguments at the moment
[38:42.460 --> 38:45.660]  Okay, i'm just saying you're reading from an old version. No this is okay
[38:46.860 --> 38:51.420]  Once challenged jurisdiction cannot be assumed. It must be proven
[38:52.780 --> 38:54.780]  Stuck v medical examiners
[38:55.080 --> 39:00.860]  Jurisdiction once challenged cannot be assumed and must be decided may this one's out of maine
[39:00.860 --> 39:08.640]  The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings
[39:09.420 --> 39:12.780]  And that goes then this is a supreme court case
[39:13.580 --> 39:15.580]  That goes right to this issue
[39:16.060 --> 39:19.820]  Once jurisdiction is challenged the court cannot proceed
[39:20.700 --> 39:26.780]  And we maintain he's acting in the capacity of a court because he's authorized to make a quasi-judicial decision
[39:26.780 --> 39:31.180]  Cannot the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court lacks jurisdiction
[39:31.580 --> 39:34.060]  The court has no authority to reach the merits
[39:34.620 --> 39:39.340]  But but rather should dismiss the action and that's exactly what we're asking them to do
[39:41.020 --> 39:47.740]  Lee purporting to act in an administrative capacity has no authority to act outside the standing law governing his behavior
[39:48.380 --> 39:50.380]  those for the united states
[39:50.380 --> 39:57.360]  As follows if a man intentionally adopts a certain conduct in certain circumstances
[39:59.020 --> 40:03.980]  Known to him and that conduct is forbidden by the law under those circumstances
[40:04.060 --> 40:10.380]  He intentionally breaks the law in the only sense in which the law ever considers intent
[40:11.180 --> 40:13.660]  screws versus us one of my favorite case
[40:14.620 --> 40:16.620]  cases
[40:16.620 --> 40:22.780]  Uh, there was just one more. I wanted to read we demanded that he show proof of
[40:23.740 --> 40:25.660]  agency
[40:25.660 --> 40:29.980]  Actually, we demanded that he show proof of the jurisdiction of the commission
[40:30.380 --> 40:35.820]  Ask him to show that he had agency to act for the agency that the agency had jurisdiction. Okay
[40:37.100 --> 40:42.780]  Okay, this is all just going to get extremely confusing if we keep breaking it apart into extremely
[40:42.780 --> 40:50.140]  tiny minute details here it all goes to subject matter jurisdiction no matter how many pieces you break it into
[40:51.180 --> 40:53.500]  It goes to subject matter jurisdiction
[40:55.740 --> 40:57.420]  Okay
[40:57.420 --> 41:01.580]  It was going to twill a lot of you out there know twill
[41:02.940 --> 41:06.540]  And people quote twill all the time trying to use twill
[41:06.540 --> 41:14.140]  So to force someone to respond to you when you send them a notice or a demand that they respond
[41:15.660 --> 41:17.900]  Twill is only valid in one instance
[41:19.740 --> 41:24.140]  Twill is only valid when you have a duty to respond and don't
[41:25.420 --> 41:29.920]  And what twill does is goes to fraud by non-disclosure
[41:30.860 --> 41:33.340]  And that's precisely why we used it here
[41:33.340 --> 41:35.900]  Silence can only be equated with fraud
[41:36.540 --> 41:43.740]  Where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally
[41:44.380 --> 41:45.500]  misleading
[41:45.500 --> 41:48.300]  And we maintain that it's precisely
[41:49.340 --> 41:51.340]  What lee did
[41:51.820 --> 41:54.540]  By refusing to show his jurisdiction
[41:55.500 --> 41:57.820]  He was intentionally misleading
[41:57.820 --> 42:02.860]  In that he continued to exert the jurisdiction. He clearly did not have
[42:03.820 --> 42:07.500]  Okay, that's all I was going to go to and and now we get to
[42:08.300 --> 42:09.180]  to
[42:09.180 --> 42:11.180]  Article five that's fives usc
[42:12.540 --> 42:18.140]  Primarily five usc 554 and I think it's 556 but but devor was going to do that one
[42:19.260 --> 42:22.300]  You want to pick it up? Sure. Sure. Yeah, and
[42:23.500 --> 42:26.860]  I think where we're really just to come to a conclusion
[42:26.860 --> 42:30.860]  Just to clarify where we're headed with what you were saying randy is
[42:32.140 --> 42:34.140]  We never really asked
[42:34.780 --> 42:37.660]  Or demanded of lee to show his agency
[42:38.220 --> 42:41.820]  We demanded that he showed jurisdiction of the commission
[42:42.540 --> 42:44.540]  And because he had a duty
[42:45.180 --> 42:47.180]  to disclose that
[42:47.260 --> 42:52.860]  He has a duty of full disclosure, which means he also has a duty to prove up his agency
[42:52.860 --> 43:00.380]  As well. Yeah, and so that's why I wanted to be very careful about that because when you start laying down arguments
[43:00.380 --> 43:04.700]  Like this in front of high level courts like the federal appellate court in the supreme court
[43:04.700 --> 43:07.020]  You got to be really careful about these things
[43:07.020 --> 43:10.860]  And he did have a he had a duty to prove up his agency
[43:11.260 --> 43:16.780]  Because he had a duty to prove up the jurisdiction of the commission that he claims that he
[43:17.560 --> 43:20.140]  represents and he avoided
[43:20.140 --> 43:25.600]  avoided continually to prove the jurisdiction of the commission and thus he avoided the
[43:26.080 --> 43:32.080]  To prove up his agency as well. And so that's that's where we're headed with this and and I and
[43:32.720 --> 43:34.720]  Now we're going to go to title five
[43:34.880 --> 43:41.280]  How he and carlton violated title five on the other side there's no way they're going to get around this one
[43:41.600 --> 43:43.600]  This is a this is a big one
[43:44.240 --> 43:47.120]  We will be right back on the other side
[43:47.120 --> 43:49.360]  This is the rule of law
[43:58.880 --> 44:03.920]  Are you being harassed by debt collectors with phone calls letters or even lawsuits?
[44:04.480 --> 44:11.920]  Stop debt collectors now with the michael mires proven method michael mires has won six cases in federal court against debt collectors
[44:11.920 --> 44:19.680]  And now you can win, too. You'll get step-by-step instructions in plain english on how to win in court using federal civil rights
[44:19.920 --> 44:27.440]  Statues what to do when contacted by phone mail or court summons how to answer letters and phone calls how to get debt collectors
[44:27.600 --> 44:33.360]  Out of your credit report how to turn your financial tables on them and make them pay you to go away
[44:33.600 --> 44:40.720]  The michael mires proven method is the solution for how to stop debt collectors personal consultation is available as well
[44:40.720 --> 44:46.400]  For more information, please visit rule of law radio.com and click on the blue michael mires banner
[44:46.480 --> 44:52.240]  Or email michael mires at yahoo.com. That's rule of law radio.com or email
[44:52.240 --> 45:11.460]  michael mires at yahoo.com to learn how to stop debt collectors now
[45:22.260 --> 45:24.260]  Would your purpose be done
[45:45.380 --> 45:47.380]  Okay, we are back
[45:47.380 --> 45:52.980]  All right, they never they never proved that there was any violation
[45:54.260 --> 46:00.100]  Uh on the part of the plaintiff violating title 47 or 47 cfr for that matter
[46:01.540 --> 46:05.940]  But we're hoping that we've given these guys an easy way out
[46:08.660 --> 46:14.580]  To give us our way in other words, there's no oath of office they violated title five
[46:14.580 --> 46:18.580]  They've also violated procedural requirements of title 47
[46:18.980 --> 46:25.780]  So we're trying we've given them like three or four easy way out to rule in our favor without having to
[46:26.340 --> 46:27.700]  basically
[46:27.700 --> 46:32.580]  Throw out the enforcement of part 15 all over the country. So at any rate
[46:33.220 --> 46:36.580]  We're going to go to title five now what they did wrong
[46:37.220 --> 46:39.860]  And like I was saying in the previous segment
[46:39.860 --> 46:44.740]  Title five basically outlines procedural rules for administrative agencies
[46:45.380 --> 46:50.980]  Regarding how they conduct their proceedings and their investigations and their adjudications
[46:51.380 --> 46:56.020]  And all these kinds of things and there has to be a separation between the
[46:56.820 --> 47:01.620]  Agent or groups of agents that act in a prosecutorial or investigative
[47:02.260 --> 47:07.060]  manner and agents that act in the adjudicatory or reviewing
[47:07.060 --> 47:13.220]  Manner, they can't just intermix. It's like the the prosecutor and the judge can't be the same person
[47:13.460 --> 47:16.180]  All right. That's what the Magna Carta was all about
[47:16.180 --> 47:21.460]  That's what our country was founded on people have fought and died over this exact issue
[47:22.020 --> 47:24.420]  That's tyranny. That is the definition of tyranny
[47:24.420 --> 47:30.900]  And so our founders were very clear that there has to be a separation of branches of government and our
[47:31.380 --> 47:34.260]  Legislators way back in the day title five is very old
[47:34.260 --> 47:40.660]  It even says in title five when it comes to administrative agencies that have the power to make administrative rulings
[47:41.220 --> 47:47.380]  That affect people's property that there has to be a clear distinction and a separation here
[47:47.700 --> 47:54.260]  And that when evidence is handed over from the investigative a prosecutorial agent to the
[47:55.280 --> 48:02.580]  Adjudicatory or reviewing agent there has to be a hearing and the accused has to be a hearing
[48:02.580 --> 48:05.300]  And the accused has to be present
[48:06.020 --> 48:09.060]  Okay, so i'm going to read a little bit from section d
[48:09.780 --> 48:12.900]  paragraph d of section 554 of title five
[48:13.620 --> 48:15.620]  where it says
[48:15.620 --> 48:23.620]  The employee who presides at the reception of evidence pursuant to section 556 of this title shall make the recommended decision or initial
[48:23.620 --> 48:27.380]  decision required by section 557 unless he becomes
[48:28.000 --> 48:30.000]  unavailable to the agency
[48:30.000 --> 48:34.800]  Except to the extent required for disposition of ex parte matters as authorized by law
[48:35.360 --> 48:37.360]  such an employee may not
[48:37.360 --> 48:45.440]  one consult a person or party on a fact and issue unless on notice and opportunity for all parties to
[48:45.740 --> 48:47.740]  participate or to
[48:48.240 --> 48:55.140]  Be responsible or subject to supervision or direction of an employer agent engaged in the performance of investigative
[48:55.840 --> 48:57.840]  or prosecuting functions
[48:57.840 --> 48:59.840]  for the agency
[49:01.200 --> 49:05.200]  Okay, and going up above that to number c
[49:07.120 --> 49:14.800]  Paragraph c the agency shall give all interested parties opportunity for one the submission and consideration of facts arguments
[49:15.040 --> 49:21.040]  offers of settlement or proposals of adjustment when in time the nature of proceeding and the public interest permit and
[49:21.040 --> 49:28.880]  to to the extent that the parties are unable so to determine a controversy by consent hearing and decision on notice and in accordance
[49:28.880 --> 49:31.920]  with sections five to six and five fifty seven
[49:32.800 --> 49:39.120]  Okay, so it's very clear there has to be a specific way in which these
[49:40.240 --> 49:46.080]  Agents can relate to each other. So i'm going to read a little bit from our petition here
[49:46.080 --> 49:51.680]  Discussing what these rogues have done and how it's a violation of title five
[49:52.480 --> 49:53.280]  All right
[49:53.280 --> 50:00.560]  Stephen lee sent the notice of live notice of apparent liability of forfeiture claiming that it was he who had initiated
[50:00.960 --> 50:07.120]  Investigation and demanded plaintiff show cause as to why an order of forfeiture should not be issued against plaintiff
[50:07.760 --> 50:11.840]  Subsequently an alleged forfeiture order was issued by denis carlton
[50:11.840 --> 50:19.600]  Who is his supervisor? He's the uh, or uh, alleges to be the regional director of the fcc of the southwest region
[50:20.160 --> 50:25.200]  Okay, that was in the side back to the petition either an administrative hearing was held
[50:25.600 --> 50:33.440]  Where in carlton presided and lee gave evidence or lee conferred with carlton and somehow allowed carlton to stand in lee's place
[50:33.440 --> 50:38.080]  To make the decision to order the forfeiture of the plaintiff's personal property
[50:38.080 --> 50:44.720]  The forfeiture of the plaintiff's personal property if lee actually made the decision to issue the forfeiture
[50:44.800 --> 50:50.160]  Then lee obviously consulted with carlton in violation of five usc section 554
[50:50.560 --> 50:57.360]  If carlton actually issued the forfeiture then carlton had to have been the acting reviewing agent and would have
[50:57.920 --> 51:04.880]  Had to have taken testimony of lee as a witness wherein lee would have been the active acting investigative or
[51:04.880 --> 51:09.220]  Prosecutorial agent said testimony would have been taken in
[51:09.900 --> 51:11.900]  ex-parte communication
[51:11.900 --> 51:17.300]  Between lee and carlton in violation of five usc section 554 in other words
[51:18.260 --> 51:24.100]  The prosecutorial or investigative agent cannot give testimony to the reviewing
[51:24.580 --> 51:30.340]  Or adjudicatory agent ex-parte without the accused being present
[51:30.900 --> 51:33.460]  All right. This is very fundamental even
[51:33.460 --> 51:38.820]  This this kind of thing has to be in place even with administrative reviewing
[51:38.900 --> 51:39.140]  Okay
[51:39.140 --> 51:41.460]  That was my comment back to the petition
[51:41.940 --> 51:47.700]  Either lee claimed authority to render the forfeiture order or carlton claimed the authority in either case
[51:48.100 --> 51:53.220]  One necessarily conferred with another the situation begs the question
[51:53.700 --> 51:56.180]  Which one was the purportive investigative?
[51:56.180 --> 52:03.940]  Ie prosecutorial agent and which one was the purported reviewing agent i.e. The one acting in a decision-making adjudicatory
[52:04.660 --> 52:05.940]  capacity
[52:05.940 --> 52:13.940]  usc 5 section 554 dictates there must be a clear distinction and separation between these two functions the same person cannot be
[52:13.940 --> 52:20.740]  Allowed to function in both capacities such a fundamental crucial distinction and separation is also made between the judicial and executive
[52:21.220 --> 52:23.220]  branches of our federal government under
[52:23.220 --> 52:30.040]  Constitution it is clearly the intention of the legislature and authors of our constitution that an investigative
[52:30.560 --> 52:36.400]  prosecutorial agent of government never be allowed to also exercise any authority in the capacity of
[52:36.920 --> 52:38.920]  decision-making or adjudicatory
[52:38.920 --> 52:45.800]  Review this fundamental tenant is rooted in the very foundation of the grain of the fabric of our jurisprudence
[52:46.120 --> 52:51.960]  This is the very cornerstone principle going all the way back to the enactment of the magna carta in 1215
[52:51.960 --> 52:53.960]  ad
[52:54.120 --> 52:59.800]  However in either case no matter which agent claims to have exercised which role in this instance
[53:00.360 --> 53:01.560]  5 usc
[53:01.560 --> 53:03.560]  554 will have been violated
[53:03.800 --> 53:11.880]  plaintiff had no notice of the hearing wherein the determination was made as required by 5 usc 554 b and
[53:12.440 --> 53:19.800]  If lee rendered the termination he did so under 5 usc 554 a section 3 however lee requested
[53:19.800 --> 53:26.460]  Existed evidentiary input from the plaintiff and said evidence must be considered in a proper hearing
[53:27.100 --> 53:32.580]  Therefore the only conclusion to be drawn is that the determination was not made under 5
[53:32.940 --> 53:39.780]  Section 5 5 usc 554 a supra, but rather than the capacity contemplated by 5 usc
[53:39.780 --> 53:46.500]  554 d all right let me explain this there are few exceptions and those exceptions are outlined in
[53:46.500 --> 53:51.500]  section a paragraph a and one of one of the exceptions is
[53:52.660 --> 53:58.860]  Where no evidence or input is asked from the accused all right?
[53:58.860 --> 54:03.620]  Where they just take readings as in the case of the sec or they you know?
[54:04.100 --> 54:10.020]  Make determinations they gather their own data in other words. They don't ask for input or
[54:10.020 --> 54:16.980]  Evidence from the accused if they ask for evidence or input from the accused then those
[54:17.580 --> 54:24.540]  Exemptions do not apply that's basically what this is saying here all right back to the petition if Carlton made the determination
[54:24.540 --> 54:28.820]  He would have had to have done so under the authority of 5 usc
[54:29.100 --> 54:33.140]  554 a 1 in which case plaintiff had a right of notice and
[54:33.140 --> 54:40.660]  Opportunity as stipulated by 550 by 5 usc 554 b no matter how one looks at the procedures
[54:40.660 --> 54:42.460]  Followed by Lee and Carlton is clear
[54:42.460 --> 54:48.540]  They're either ignorant of the laws controlling the behavior or do not consider themselves subject to them
[54:48.980 --> 54:53.740]  So I don't see how they are going to get around this one I
[54:54.700 --> 55:00.260]  Just don't see how they're going to get around it, and it's very clear in title
[55:00.260 --> 55:02.260]  47
[55:03.220 --> 55:07.500]  That's another argument in this petition that there there had to have been
[55:08.100 --> 55:14.580]  Before a notice of apparent liability of forfeiture could even be issued by any of these
[55:16.660 --> 55:23.500]  Scoundrels there had to have been a citation issued and there also had to have been the opportunity
[55:24.540 --> 55:26.540]  for an in-person
[55:26.540 --> 55:30.500]  Administrative hearing at the nearest field office
[55:31.100 --> 55:36.380]  Which would have allegedly been in Houston and as we all know there is no Houston field office some mail
[55:36.940 --> 55:40.840]  Etc we would we could all meet in the mailbox. Yeah, so
[55:41.460 --> 55:48.420]  Even part of we didn't even bring up the mailbox issue on this one in this in this petition the bottom line is
[55:48.860 --> 55:54.760]  It's very very clear. It's very very strong. There's a couple of exceptions in title 47
[55:54.760 --> 55:59.720]  regarding these administrative hearings where the accused must be present, but
[56:00.160 --> 56:07.560]  None of those exceptions or exemptions apply in that case either and so even if they want to blow off the oath of office
[56:08.440 --> 56:11.960]  How are they going to blow off title five? I?
[56:12.520 --> 56:16.720]  Just don't see how they're going to do it. I mean if the court throws away
[56:17.320 --> 56:19.320]  title five and
[56:19.440 --> 56:21.440]  even fundamental
[56:21.440 --> 56:28.240]  Tenants of title 47 and title 28 well, then it's a hopeless case
[56:28.240 --> 56:32.800]  There is no law okay. I just don't see how they're going to throw away title five
[56:32.800 --> 56:38.160]  I just don't see how it's going to happen and so we're hoping that this is one of the ways
[56:38.160 --> 56:44.200]  We're going to give these guys an easy way out to dump the forfeiture and leave us alone
[56:44.200 --> 56:48.080]  And if they don't want to do that well, then let's get it on
[56:48.080 --> 56:51.960]  Let's talk about how there really was no accusation
[56:53.040 --> 56:58.600]  towards the plaintiff of even violating 47 CFR section 15 or
[56:59.280 --> 57:04.480]  Title 47 they never accused they never accused the plaintiff of violating
[57:04.800 --> 57:09.280]  Any specific paragraph of section 301 of title 47?
[57:09.280 --> 57:14.240]  They said they just said are you violated section 301 of title 47 well dude
[57:14.240 --> 57:18.800]  That's like saying you violated the Texas penal code you know
[57:18.800 --> 57:23.520]  Can you be a little more specific if you're going to accuse someone of breaking a law you got to be specific
[57:23.520 --> 57:28.480]  You got to name the paragraph. You got to show that the activities fall
[57:29.200 --> 57:34.000]  Within the descriptions of that paragraph and that the definitions apply as well
[57:35.120 --> 57:43.600]  They didn't prove that the accused was even a person as the definition of person is in title 47 or the definition of a state
[57:43.600 --> 57:49.760]  Either I mean we're busting them any which way you want to slice it, so that's the analysis of
[57:50.320 --> 57:57.600]  Title five here regarding this petition, so I think we've pretty well done our homework on this one
[57:58.720 --> 58:04.320]  Let's see how they respond Eric Holder the Attorney General was just served with this case
[58:05.920 --> 58:11.200]  Yesterday so we'll see what they come up with they got 14 days to respond
[58:11.200 --> 58:14.320]  If they don't respond in 14 days we get to move for default judgment
[58:17.120 --> 58:22.720]  And if we don't get our way in the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals we're going to the Supreme Court
[58:22.720 --> 58:25.920]  See what they have to say about title five
[58:27.440 --> 58:30.960]  All right when we come back we'll be taking your calls we're going to open up the floor
[58:30.960 --> 58:36.720]  For your questions comments Eddie has some stuff to present too we got Rodney from Texas we'll be right back
[58:36.720 --> 58:42.160]  This is the rule of law 512-646-1984
[59:36.720 --> 01:00:00.160]  Music
[01:00:00.720 --> 01:00:04.720]  This news brief brought to you by the international news net
[01:00:04.720 --> 01:00:11.440]  Tidoro Garcia Cimental one of Mexico's most wanted drug lords has been captured in the Baja Peninsula
[01:00:11.440 --> 01:00:17.200]  Officials said they also detained a brother El Tarito a hit man known as a soup maker confessed
[01:00:17.200 --> 01:00:24.400]  last year to dissolving hundreds of bodies in acid for Mr Garcia. Violence in Mexico has spiraled to
[01:00:24.400 --> 01:00:30.400]  unprecedented levels as the country's drug war claimed a record 69 lives in one day this week
[01:00:30.400 --> 01:00:36.640]  283 people are believed to have died in drug-related violence in the first 10 days of this year
[01:00:36.640 --> 01:00:42.640]  Several victims were beheaded one had his face sliced off and stitched to a football with a note
[01:00:42.640 --> 01:00:50.560]  attached wishing him a happy new year. A failed clinical trial HIV vaccine that left 46 Zambian
[01:00:50.560 --> 01:00:56.720]  women infected as outraged Zambians who are accusing the microbiases development program of
[01:00:56.720 --> 01:01:04.400]  using African women as guinea pigs. The MDP testing if the gel pro 2000 would prevent HIV infection
[01:01:04.400 --> 01:01:12.880]  took place between 2005 and 2009. Zambia is among African countries hardest hit by HIV with 14% of
[01:01:12.880 --> 01:01:20.240]  its population of 13 million affected. Haitian president Rene Preval said Wednesday the death
[01:01:20.240 --> 01:01:25.920]  toll from Tuesday's massive earthquake would be unimaginable thousands are missing and medical
[01:01:25.920 --> 01:01:33.120]  aid workers overwhelmed untold thousands of people have died in the massive 7.0 magnitude quake that
[01:01:33.120 --> 01:01:38.080]  has flattened Port-au-Prince and plunged the poorest country in the western hemisphere into
[01:01:38.080 --> 01:01:44.640]  disarray. The first cargo planes with food water medical supplies and sniffer dogs headed to the
[01:01:44.640 --> 01:01:50.240]  country Wednesday but officials say it could be too late for many of those trapped and dying under
[01:01:50.240 --> 01:01:56.080]  the rubble. Rescue workers worry that survivors or those trapped in collapsed buildings may die
[01:01:56.080 --> 01:02:02.400]  from exposure or thirst before they can be treated. Former president Bill Clinton the UN special envoy
[01:02:02.400 --> 01:02:08.720]  to Haiti urged nations to provide helicopters and medical supplies and citizens to donate money to
[01:02:08.720 --> 01:02:15.120]  aid organizations. Red Cross spokesperson Paul Connolly said an estimated three million people
[01:02:15.120 --> 01:02:25.600]  one third of the entire population may need emergency aid. An associated press review of the
[01:02:25.600 --> 01:02:32.000]  UN's anti-corruption task force has found out a single significant fraud or corruption case has
[01:02:32.000 --> 01:02:39.600]  been completed over the past year. This is compared to an average 150 cases a year is spent investigating
[01:02:39.600 --> 01:02:46.640]  the possible theft or misuse of millions of dollars. At least five major cases in Afghanistan Iraq
[01:02:46.640 --> 01:02:53.520]  and Africa are among the inquiries halted. The UN was rocked when more than 2 000 companies colluded
[01:02:53.520 --> 01:03:01.920]  with Saddam Hussein to build 1.8 billion dollars from the oil for food program. You are listening
[01:03:01.920 --> 01:03:09.920]  to the rule of law radio network at ruleoflawradio.com live free speech talk radio at its best.
[01:03:32.640 --> 01:03:43.200]  Okay we are back we're about to take your calls we're going to go to Ronnie from Texas but before
[01:03:43.200 --> 01:03:48.160]  we do I just wanted to make one last comment about what we were discussing everything we just
[01:03:48.160 --> 01:03:55.520]  talked about here by the way the lack of oath of office of the violations of title five the violations
[01:03:55.520 --> 01:04:00.640]  of title 47 regarding their administrative procedures or lack thereof the fact that they
[01:04:00.640 --> 01:04:06.720]  never accused the plaintiff of violating title 47 to begin with properly there was no proper
[01:04:06.720 --> 01:04:13.920]  accusation there's no accusation that there was any violations of 47 CFR all these things these
[01:04:13.920 --> 01:04:19.680]  are still just all jurisdictional arguments we haven't even started talking about the merits of
[01:04:19.680 --> 01:04:24.960]  the case yet hopefully it'll never even get that far but the merits would be issues like
[01:04:24.960 --> 01:04:31.600]  the very charter foundational charter of the FCC demands that the purpose of their existence
[01:04:31.600 --> 01:04:38.960]  is to open up the airwaves for the general public to broadcast for the free dissemination
[01:04:38.960 --> 01:04:45.600]  of information little things like they haven't given out any licenses for low power FM's
[01:04:45.600 --> 01:04:55.440]  for almost seven years little things like they're here to make sure that the airwaves are open for
[01:04:55.440 --> 01:05:02.080]  the public interest and that radio broadcast stations they're even here to ensure that radio
[01:05:02.080 --> 01:05:09.200]  stations do serve the public interest little things like 90.1 has received over 400 letters
[01:05:09.200 --> 01:05:18.640]  from the public stating that it serves the public interest with many hundreds more on the way once
[01:05:18.640 --> 01:05:24.800]  we launch our campaign so you know that's those are just a few little small things if they want
[01:05:24.800 --> 01:05:29.200]  to try to go to the merits of the case hopefully it won't even get that far at any rate we're going
[01:05:29.200 --> 01:05:34.560]  to go now to your calls we got Rodney from Texas Rodney go ahead what is your comment or question
[01:05:34.560 --> 01:05:42.640]  well thank you for that great information it actually ties right in with my situation I'm
[01:05:42.640 --> 01:05:49.200]  in I'm deeply involved in it I guess guess what an administrative hearing and I'm getting screwed
[01:05:49.200 --> 01:05:55.200]  around just like you guys are I've already challenged the subject matter jurisdiction
[01:05:55.200 --> 01:06:04.720]  matter jurisdiction of this hearing officer and also a few other things and even
[01:06:06.640 --> 01:06:13.680]  use one of the tools from jurisdictionary judicial notice to let this lady know she's not even
[01:06:13.680 --> 01:06:21.440]  licensed lawyer or to practice law here in the state of Texas you know and according to the bar
[01:06:21.440 --> 01:06:26.800]  texas they say that there's no exceptions to that rule but you know this this person that says you
[01:06:26.800 --> 01:06:36.320]  know I could care less haven't made any type of ruling on my motion for clarification on
[01:06:36.320 --> 01:06:44.560]  her subject matter jurisdiction or anything and so I'm wondering that you know the under the
[01:06:44.560 --> 01:06:54.240]  administrative law that you cited there and with the title five how do you disqualify a person
[01:06:54.240 --> 01:07:00.960]  because she's done basically everything that you said that these the persons that are involved in
[01:07:00.960 --> 01:07:06.800]  your situation that's been ex parte communication well Rodney that title five applies to federal
[01:07:06.800 --> 01:07:10.240]  agencies so I don't know if that would apply in your case you'd have to give us more information
[01:07:10.240 --> 01:07:18.320]  yeah but if a judge or any official exercises or reports to exercise an authority they don't have
[01:07:18.320 --> 01:07:25.760]  that's a crime you should file criminal charges against them and a civil action even if the civil
[01:07:25.760 --> 01:07:34.000]  action is in the jp court it only costs 60 bucks to file sue them for ten thousand dollars accuse
[01:07:34.000 --> 01:07:43.120]  them of acting without subject matter jurisdiction okay the the the the case hinges you know the
[01:07:43.120 --> 01:07:52.080]  primary thing you want to get around you want to avoid is summary judgment and what summary
[01:07:52.080 --> 01:08:04.400]  judgment hinges on is not what you can prove up but the nature of the the allegation that you make
[01:08:04.400 --> 01:08:11.520]  if you allege that the judge acted without subject matter jurisdiction and they they will say oh
[01:08:11.520 --> 01:08:18.560]  she had subject matter jurisdiction well that's a matter in a factual matter in contention before
[01:08:18.560 --> 01:08:24.080]  the court and that can only be adjudicated in the court case so summary judgment would not apply
[01:08:25.040 --> 01:08:31.280]  so you can get past summary judgment to adjudication of the issues of the case
[01:08:32.560 --> 01:08:39.280]  and once you file a civil action against the judge the judge has an interest in the case
[01:08:39.280 --> 01:08:47.120]  therefore she is constitutionally or he is constitutionally disqualified
[01:08:48.080 --> 01:08:57.600]  so judge's history when when uh mark sued the justice of the peace did a cross complaint against
[01:08:57.600 --> 01:09:04.640]  the justice of the peace here in travis county he immediately recused himself and that was exactly
[01:09:04.640 --> 01:09:10.640]  and that was exactly appropriate that's whether he agreed with it whether he thought he could beat it
[01:09:10.640 --> 01:09:17.680]  all of that didn't matter he had a duty to to stand aside and to his credit he did exactly
[01:09:17.680 --> 01:09:26.000]  what he should have done let me ask you this uh this hearing officer uh denied my right
[01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:36.560]  uh to at the polls witnesses who were testifying against me and that's a structural error that's
[01:09:36.560 --> 01:09:44.480]  criminal on part of the judge in order to to adjudicate to address this effectively you know
[01:09:44.480 --> 01:09:48.880]  you're just saying that she did that where it's not enough information we need to understand how
[01:09:48.880 --> 01:09:56.560]  this come about to better understand how to address the issue but if you're denied a witness with
[01:09:56.560 --> 01:10:06.480]  cause i mean without cause uh it may be you know if you're in a civil action you need to notify the
[01:10:06.480 --> 01:10:13.840]  opposing party of your witness list if they request it and if you try to call a witness that you
[01:10:13.840 --> 01:10:21.760]  hadn't put on your witness list then the other side can legitimately inject to it because they
[01:10:21.760 --> 01:10:28.480]  haven't had time to check into your witness to see see if they have a way to impeach the witness
[01:10:29.680 --> 01:10:35.600]  so in civil there's no surprise you can't bushwhack somebody in civil so if you tried to call a
[01:10:35.600 --> 01:10:41.360]  witness that wasn't revealed to the other side before you call the witness they can legitimately
[01:10:41.360 --> 01:10:48.560]  so you know we have to find to kind of know what the circumstances are well i'm letting you know
[01:10:48.560 --> 01:10:57.760]  that i said i haven't noticed a list of all of the witnesses that i wanted to depose uh far in
[01:10:57.760 --> 01:11:05.120]  advance uh and uh none of these people showed up for depositions which didn't surprise me
[01:11:05.120 --> 01:11:14.880]  and then uh i went back uh and asked the judge to compel uh that didn't happen then i asked for a
[01:11:14.880 --> 01:11:23.680]  subpoena that didn't happen did you file against the judge on each instance no no you need to stop
[01:11:23.680 --> 01:11:35.600]  to stop and go back and pretend like you are a a prosecutor brought in to prosecute the judge
[01:11:36.800 --> 01:11:42.480]  okay and see what violations you can come up with on the judge
[01:11:42.480 --> 01:11:51.360]  and write all those up put each separate occurrence of an improper action in a separate
[01:11:51.360 --> 01:12:00.160]  judicial conduct complaint and each separate denial of a right in a separate criminal complaint
[01:12:00.160 --> 01:12:10.320]  in a separate criminal complaint and file those in the court and because there are criminal
[01:12:12.080 --> 01:12:19.280]  accusations you know you can claim that she file an objection to something that the judge did
[01:12:20.640 --> 01:12:26.000]  and in the objection make a criminal accusation a verify with a verified criminal affidavit
[01:12:26.000 --> 01:12:33.280]  and that'll have the effect of disqualifying the judge okay and you know when she doesn't then you
[01:12:33.280 --> 01:12:37.680]  just go to the district attorney and ask the district attorney to arrest the judge to have
[01:12:37.680 --> 01:12:48.960]  the judge arrested and he is obviously is this a district judge no it's just a uh uh i'm trying to
[01:12:48.960 --> 01:12:56.560]  be polite here because i've been angry about this all day uh uh just the hearing officer oh
[01:12:56.560 --> 01:13:06.320]  administrative oh they will crucify an administrative hearing officer so you need to notify okay is this
[01:13:07.680 --> 01:13:17.520]  what jurisdiction is she under uh county city state state i i challenge the subject matter
[01:13:17.520 --> 01:13:25.680]  jurisdiction and uh that she ignored that i heard you give type some cases uh i don't know if those
[01:13:25.680 --> 01:13:32.400]  were federal cases that they apply across the border there i have in those cases i cited
[01:13:33.360 --> 01:13:39.840]  they're all over the place they're federal they're different states and that's to show
[01:13:39.840 --> 01:13:46.160]  that this is consistent everywhere this is a maxim of law but the police that i got from
[01:13:46.160 --> 01:13:53.280]  from from what you said is that once i in this case challenged the subject matter jurisdiction
[01:13:53.840 --> 01:13:59.040]  this hearing officer cannot move forward until they have proved up the subject matter
[01:13:59.920 --> 01:14:05.200]  exactly and and the issue is not whether or not the hearing officer has jurisdiction
[01:14:06.960 --> 01:14:14.400]  the issue is is the hearing officer did not prove jurisdiction okay so since it's an
[01:14:14.400 --> 01:14:19.760]  administrative judge start filing criminal charges against him that'll get their attention
[01:14:20.720 --> 01:14:25.120]  i'm gonna get on that right away okay and what's gonna happen when you file a criminal charge
[01:14:26.160 --> 01:14:31.520]  is whoever you file it with you know i suggest do not go to to the police
[01:14:33.280 --> 01:14:43.680]  they'll trash it go to a magistrate a judge file it with the judge and the judge will refuse to take
[01:14:43.680 --> 01:14:50.720]  it like go to the local jp and hand him these complaints and he's going to say oh well you have
[01:14:50.720 --> 01:14:55.920]  to take those to the police department and you tell him nope i didn't take them to the police
[01:14:55.920 --> 01:15:03.280]  department brought them to you and he'll refuse to take them and then what you do is you go to
[01:15:03.280 --> 01:15:09.920]  the district attorney with criminal charges against the justice of the peace for refusing
[01:15:09.920 --> 01:15:16.720]  to take criminal charges against another public official and the prosecuting attorney is going to
[01:15:16.720 --> 01:15:22.560]  refuse to prosecute and then you put you forget about the other two guys and then you file criminal
[01:15:22.560 --> 01:15:31.040]  charges against the the district attorney with the district judge accusing the district attorney of
[01:15:31.040 --> 01:15:39.120]  refusing to give criminal complaints to the grand jury against the judge who wouldn't take criminal
[01:15:39.120 --> 01:15:44.960]  complaints against the administrative hearing person and the district judge will refuse to take
[01:15:44.960 --> 01:15:51.600]  your complaint and then you go back to the district attorney with criminal charges against the district
[01:15:51.600 --> 01:15:59.440]  judge for misfeasance in office failure to perform a duty they're required to perform and in the
[01:15:59.440 --> 01:16:05.840]  process deny you in your right to petition the court for redress of grievance that's official
[01:16:05.840 --> 01:16:13.840]  oppression 39.03 penal code go back to the district attorney and charge the the judge
[01:16:14.640 --> 01:16:19.680]  with official oppression for refusing to take criminal complaints against the district attorney
[01:16:20.480 --> 01:16:26.960]  and demand that the district attorney refuse himself and petition the district court to
[01:16:26.960 --> 01:16:35.200]  appoint a special prosecutor to prosecute his self this makes it get ugly for everybody
[01:16:35.200 --> 01:16:39.040]  okay listen and i just got a skype chat from the call screen here we've got pat
[01:16:39.040 --> 01:16:45.360]  from west texas who's hanging on top of the water tower okay good we'll take you next
[01:16:48.960 --> 01:16:51.440]  okay we will be right back this is the rule of law
[01:16:59.920 --> 01:17:04.080]  you feel tired when talking about important topics like money and politics
[01:17:04.080 --> 01:17:08.800]  are you confused by words like the constitution or the federal reserve what if so you may be
[01:17:08.800 --> 01:17:14.800]  diagnosed with the deadliest disease known today stupidity hi my name is steve holt and like
[01:17:14.800 --> 01:17:20.000]  millions of other americans i was diagnosed with stupidity at an early age i had no idea
[01:17:20.000 --> 01:17:24.960]  that the number one cause of the disease is found in almost every home in america the television
[01:17:24.960 --> 01:17:30.560]  unfortunately that puts most americans at risk of catching stupidity but there is hope the staff
[01:17:30.560 --> 01:17:35.200]  at brave new books have helped me and thousands of other foxaholics suffering from sports zombieism
[01:17:35.200 --> 01:17:40.480]  recover and because of brave new books i now enjoy reading and watching educational documentaries
[01:17:40.480 --> 01:17:46.240]  without feeling tired or uninterested so if you or anybody you know suffers from stupidity then
[01:17:46.240 --> 01:17:54.480]  you need to call 512-480-2503 or visit them in 1904 guadalupe or brave new bookstore.com
[01:17:54.480 --> 01:17:57.920]  side effects when using brave new books products may include discernment and enlarged vocabulary
[01:17:57.920 --> 01:18:03.040]  and an overall increase in mental functioning
[01:18:04.560 --> 01:18:06.080]  ain't gonna blame me
[01:18:10.160 --> 01:18:17.040]  don't bore me
[01:18:17.040 --> 01:18:25.040]  yeah
[01:18:37.200 --> 01:18:44.880]  okay not gonna fool us with the same old tricks again anymore we're on to them big time okay we're
[01:18:44.880 --> 01:18:50.240]  going to spend a whole show going over due process again we've uh randy and i have gone
[01:18:50.240 --> 01:18:54.160]  over due process two or three times we're going to do it again uh but ronnie we need to let you
[01:18:54.160 --> 01:18:59.280]  go because pat from west texas is hanging off the water tower right now uh way up there
[01:19:00.320 --> 01:19:05.200]  waving in the air and also eddie has some material he wants to present before the show
[01:19:05.200 --> 01:19:10.640]  is over so we're going to go to due process later but we're going to go to pat from texas
[01:19:10.640 --> 01:19:16.560]  right now pat yeah when we say pat is hanging in there we mean that literally he is literally
[01:19:16.560 --> 01:19:22.480]  hanging hanging in there go ahead pat oh you guys give me too much credit
[01:19:23.840 --> 01:19:30.160]  um i but i have a couple questions real quick because of something that happened this morning
[01:19:30.160 --> 01:19:36.160]  with a border patrolman making an unlawful traffic stop out here oh yeah i heard about
[01:19:36.160 --> 01:19:41.120]  this i'm tom keiley's show meta called in and gave us a heads up tell us all about it yeah
[01:19:42.080 --> 01:19:49.040]  well what i'd like to get from eddie is uh if he would just give me an email about
[01:19:50.000 --> 01:19:56.560]  the appropriate uh code that says that you travel with a firearm in the automobile
[01:19:57.200 --> 01:20:04.080]  i know it's not concealed carry i know that we can do it i just have access to the computer right now
[01:20:04.080 --> 01:20:09.360]  uh we've got until next week and i'm going to have to put some stuff together probably by monday
[01:20:12.880 --> 01:20:20.080]  and then never i'm going to ask you do you have that title i've stuff posted on the website no
[01:20:20.080 --> 01:20:26.080]  we have not posted the petition yet but you can look up title five it's title five section 554
[01:20:26.800 --> 01:20:31.840]  i will post it on the website well we need to ask the plaintiff if the plaintiff is willing for us
[01:20:31.840 --> 01:20:39.440]  to post the petition on the website first that's right i'm sure you because i am not the plaintiff
[01:20:39.440 --> 01:20:45.360]  in this case and neither is randy randy and i are plaintiffs randy and i are plaintiffs in another
[01:20:45.360 --> 01:20:50.080]  case involving the fcc but in this particular case neither one of us are the plaintiffs so we
[01:20:50.080 --> 01:20:56.080]  need to ask permission first but you can just look at title title five title five section 554
[01:20:56.080 --> 01:21:03.600]  554 okay good because that applies to more than just the fcc that's all federal agencies
[01:21:03.600 --> 01:21:10.080]  correct all federal agencies that have that have the power to for administrative review
[01:21:10.080 --> 01:21:17.600]  administrative orders that affect property ownership okay good that's what i needed
[01:21:17.600 --> 01:21:25.600]  is i've got another issue with somebody totally different on a totally different subject and that
[01:21:26.240 --> 01:21:32.720]  i heard that earlier this evening and it just clicked the bell that that was beautiful
[01:21:33.360 --> 01:21:41.840]  timing couldn't have been better but if eddie could shoot me an email on the one i would
[01:21:41.840 --> 01:21:50.800]  greatly appreciate it penal code section 46.02 subsection a one and i'm sorry i'm good i'm
[01:21:50.800 --> 01:21:59.040]  breaking up out here could you say that again sir penal code section 46.02 subsection a sub item one
[01:21:59.040 --> 01:22:08.560]  and two i got it and also pat there's there was a law passed recently by the state legislature
[01:22:08.560 --> 01:22:15.120]  regarding traveling with firearms and basically lifting all restrictions and making it so that
[01:22:15.120 --> 01:22:20.240]  just about anything is considered traveling it doesn't have to be between counties anymore
[01:22:20.800 --> 01:22:27.520]  yeah section 4602 is titled unlawful carrying weapons and subsection a says a person commits
[01:22:27.520 --> 01:22:32.000]  an offense if the person intentionally knowingly or recklessly carries on or about his or her person
[01:22:32.000 --> 01:22:38.480]  a handgun illegal knife or club if the person is not on the person's own premises or premises
[01:22:38.480 --> 01:22:44.320]  under the person's control or inside of or directly in route to a motor vehicle that
[01:22:44.320 --> 01:22:48.800]  is owned by the person or under the person's control bingo
[01:22:51.600 --> 01:22:58.320]  it sounds good i was not in my own vehicle but i was another person's vehicle that was under their
[01:22:58.320 --> 01:23:04.960]  control no no eddie that that talks about having the firearm on your person right not necessarily
[01:23:04.960 --> 01:23:12.960]  in the vehicle is that correct it this speaks to intentionally knowingly or recklessly carries
[01:23:12.960 --> 01:23:18.240]  on or about his person a handgun if you're not doing any of these things right on the person
[01:23:18.240 --> 01:23:23.680]  this does not appear in the language to limit your ability to have it on you in the car right
[01:23:24.400 --> 01:23:29.520]  that's what i figured and i just wanted to make sure that that was the explicit wording
[01:23:29.520 --> 01:23:37.440]  i knew i'd read it but it's been a while and i just wanted to double verify but this other thing
[01:23:37.440 --> 01:23:42.160]  once and that's just the penal code section there is a separate statute as deborah said
[01:23:42.880 --> 01:23:48.320]  that uh that takes away the prohibitions entirely and i have that somewhere and i'll find that and
[01:23:48.320 --> 01:23:54.080]  get it to you i do appreciate it that's probably pretty easy that's probably pretty easy to find
[01:23:54.080 --> 01:24:02.000]  on the internet pad just look up traveling with firearm in vehicle texas this is a pretty recent
[01:24:02.000 --> 01:24:07.040]  this was only like two or three years ago and basically lifted all restrictions on having a
[01:24:07.040 --> 01:24:14.560]  firearm in the car period i mean basically if you're going to work i mean you could you could be
[01:24:14.560 --> 01:24:19.840]  going to uh your you know to the convenience store down the street and that's considered
[01:24:19.840 --> 01:24:26.000]  traveling with the firearm in the car it used to be that uh it was very specific the definition
[01:24:26.000 --> 01:24:32.880]  of traveling with a with a firearm meant going from one county to another county or an overnight
[01:24:32.880 --> 01:24:39.120]  stay or things like this and they lifted all those restrictions so uh that that should be easy to
[01:24:39.120 --> 01:24:45.360]  find and i'll look that up for you too all right that sounds good i do appreciate it's just that the
[01:24:45.360 --> 01:24:51.760]  the computer right now has decided to go south with her i'm having to buy a new one i won't have
[01:24:51.760 --> 01:24:57.760]  it until sometime next week so uh we're doing a tap dance right now all right
[01:25:00.320 --> 01:25:04.800]  it's just the nature of the beast unfortunately if you live in the middle of everything sometimes
[01:25:04.800 --> 01:25:12.640]  you accept it oh we need to get meta on if she's running for office so she we can get her name out
[01:25:12.640 --> 01:25:22.320]  uh she's running for state senator against uh mr uresti and i'm running for county commissioner
[01:25:22.320 --> 01:25:29.120]  precinct 2 out in charles county see we need to do a show with you guys i've got another question
[01:25:29.120 --> 01:25:37.200]  and this one might be of interest to randy as uh as well randy and eddie and as well and that is
[01:25:37.200 --> 01:25:44.240]  the man that stopped us this morning even though he did not have jurisdiction and a lot of other
[01:25:44.240 --> 01:25:53.200]  side issues said he knew the vehicle he knew the driver and he knew who i was and i've already been
[01:25:53.200 --> 01:26:01.840]  in the paper as being a candidate for office and i've already been declared the enemy by the people
[01:26:01.840 --> 01:26:11.520]  that he works for so i'm not real sure of the statutes that deal with harassment of candidates
[01:26:11.520 --> 01:26:20.720]  for office i don't know if there's one specifically for that but if he did he have candidate
[01:26:20.720 --> 01:26:30.800]  if he did he have candidate is an automatic public servant the minute that you officially
[01:26:31.680 --> 01:26:36.880]  send into the secretary of state your candidacy for office well pat isn't there another issue
[01:26:36.880 --> 01:26:42.800]  that these are border patrol agents and they don't have the right to engage in traffic stops to
[01:26:42.800 --> 01:26:50.480]  enforce the transportation code to begin with well well that's well from the very very beginning
[01:26:50.480 --> 01:27:01.760]  they had no jurisdiction and the man driving asked the young man that stopped us and he said
[01:27:01.760 --> 01:27:08.160]  yes it's a traffic stop and he was a border patrol agent that's what i was talking about
[01:27:08.160 --> 01:27:15.360]  three bags full that's what i was just talking about and he's not a special agent he is a border
[01:27:15.360 --> 01:27:25.360]  patrol agent as defined in the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure they are not peace officers
[01:27:25.360 --> 01:27:32.720]  in the state of Texas they only have authority in two areas the actual physical or some points
[01:27:33.440 --> 01:27:43.360]  between Mexican exodus and permanent installed vehicle inspection point there's only two of them
[01:27:43.360 --> 01:27:53.360]  in the state then i have a suggestion presuppose that it wasn't this individual who stopped you
[01:27:54.160 --> 01:28:02.400]  but the director of the agent who stopped the agency who stopped you because the agent is acting
[01:28:02.400 --> 01:28:07.840]  under the direction of the principal and filed criminally against the principal
[01:28:07.840 --> 01:28:15.440]  okay also it was house bill 1815 that allowed the carrying of a gun in your car
[01:28:15.440 --> 01:28:21.440]  do you have the code that was codified into we can get that from there
[01:28:22.800 --> 01:28:30.320]  i don't see that at the moment no but it's house bill 1815 i'll find it i won't have access to
[01:28:30.320 --> 01:28:39.520]  i won't have access to a computer that does any real anything for a few days but when i get it i'll get it up i do appreciate it
[01:28:39.520 --> 01:28:46.080]  but if you're running for office if you're running for office
[01:28:46.080 --> 01:28:55.440]  and a border patrol agent stopped you on a highway he had to have been sent by his boss to do that
[01:28:55.440 --> 01:29:01.440]  thank you especially since they said they know the car
[01:29:01.440 --> 01:29:09.440]  the precisely not only do they know the car but there's a camera positioned on the fence across from my front gate
[01:29:09.440 --> 01:29:15.440]  they've been watching my front gate now for about eight months
[01:29:15.440 --> 01:29:23.440]  scary how do i know that it's their camera number one i see it there two by every third day one of the agents
[01:29:23.440 --> 01:29:25.440]  stops and checks it
[01:29:27.440 --> 01:29:35.440]  see somebody's likely to drive by and shoot that thing right off of there all right listen you know how these rednecks are
[01:29:35.440 --> 01:29:43.440]  all right we're going to break pat you got other colors okay thank you all right when we get back
[01:29:43.440 --> 01:29:49.440]  i want to give eddie a chance to talk about some material that he wanted to present tonight as well
[01:29:49.440 --> 01:29:53.440]  this is the rule of law
[01:29:59.440 --> 01:30:05.440]  are you the plaintiff or defendant in a lawsuit win your case without an attorney with jurisdictionary
[01:30:05.440 --> 01:30:13.440]  the affordable easy to understand 4 cd course that will show you how in 24 hours step by step
[01:30:13.440 --> 01:30:21.440]  if you have a lawyer know what your lawyer should be doing if you don't have a lawyer know what you should do for yourself
[01:30:21.440 --> 01:30:29.440]  thousands have won with our step by step course and now you can too jurisdictionary was created by a licensed attorney
[01:30:29.440 --> 01:30:37.440]  with 22 years of case winning experience even if you're not in a lawsuit you can learn what everyone should understand
[01:30:37.440 --> 01:30:43.440]  about the principles and practices that control our american courts you'll receive our audio classroom
[01:30:43.440 --> 01:30:53.440]  video seminar tutorials forms for civil cases pro se tactics and much more please visit ruleoflawradio.com
[01:30:53.440 --> 01:30:59.440]  and click on the banner or call toll free 866 law easy
[01:30:59.440 --> 01:31:09.440]  yeah
[01:31:29.440 --> 01:31:39.440]  okay we're back all right we found the statute that that house bill was codified into and eddie wants to talk about the constitutional role of attorneys as well
[01:31:39.440 --> 01:31:51.440]  so go ahead eddie what what is the statute number yeah the statute is the one i referenced penal code 46.02 to pat so that's where they codified house bill 1815 is in 46.02
[01:31:51.440 --> 01:32:01.440]  now the the thing that i want to discuss was i've come into an analysis here on on what we're doing on this blog site to discuss
[01:32:01.440 --> 01:32:13.440]  how to view the powers and authority of government and in a lot of different ways we're coming to the conclusion that we have a lot of constitutional violations in the statutes themselves
[01:32:13.440 --> 01:32:25.440]  not just relating to traffic but to numerous statutes in texas and and the way we come to that determination is an analysis of how an attorney becomes an attorney okay
[01:32:25.440 --> 01:32:35.440]  the first thing is is that chapter 84 of the government code stipulates that an attorney gets licensed by the supreme court of the state of texas okay
[01:32:35.440 --> 01:32:46.440]  so in texas that's how an attorney gets a license if the supreme court is using one now there are certain requirements that that license must adhere to it's got to have his oath on it
[01:32:46.440 --> 01:32:58.440]  it's got to be signed by the justice and it's got to be signed by the attorney and this all must be encompassed in the thing that is his license then in order to actually practice with that license
[01:32:58.440 --> 01:33:09.440]  the attorney must have paid his membership dues and be enrolled as a member of the state bar so this leads me to the following set of questions which i'm sure you may have heard me discuss before
[01:33:09.440 --> 01:33:18.440]  but when an attorney gets a license and pays his bar card dues that attorney automatically becomes an officer of the court
[01:33:18.440 --> 01:33:28.440]  the courts in texas are created and empowered under article 5 of the texas constitution the judicial branch of government okay
[01:33:28.440 --> 01:33:44.440]  so as officers of the judicial branch of government how is it possible for attorneys to serve as members of the legislature which is a legislative branch of government
[01:33:44.440 --> 01:34:04.440]  especially since article 2 of the state constitution specifically forbids and prohibits any person holding an office under one branch of government from exercising the power and authority of any other branch of government
[01:34:04.440 --> 01:34:17.440]  so how do we get attorneys serving in the legislature well randy and i discussed that and some of the arguments that came out were that well they're not doing the same job at the same time
[01:34:17.440 --> 01:34:26.440]  when they're working as an attorney then they're a judicial officer but when they're working on the legislator they're a legislative officer so the two don't really mix
[01:34:26.440 --> 01:34:40.440]  and there's a problem i would like a comment when you said some of the arguments that came out yes he wasn't kidding we do that a lot
[01:34:40.440 --> 01:34:57.440]  but the point being that the constitution in article 2 does not speak to whether they are acting in a certain capacity it specifically speaks to them holding an office in one branch versus another
[01:34:57.440 --> 01:35:17.440]  so it is irrelevant as to how they are acting what is relevant is what office do they officially hold they cannot simultaneously lawfully serve as a member of the legislature and still actively work as a licensed bar card carrying attorney
[01:35:17.440 --> 01:35:35.440]  without violating article 2 there's just no common sense argument that can be made for that to be allowed it's just impossible because they hold an office as an officer of a judicial court a branch of government
[01:35:35.440 --> 01:35:53.440]  they hold an office as a legislative a legislative member in a legislative branch of government that is two public offices now this led to another argument this came down to the point of okay well they're not really in a public office
[01:35:53.440 --> 01:36:15.440]  when they operate as a lawyer because their being a member of the bar does not make them a member of government because the bar is private okay well that argument brings up a whole nother can of worms to deal with and that can of worms contains two very big ones in my book okay
[01:36:15.440 --> 01:36:32.440]  the first one being is that when it suits them the courts argue that the state bar is regulated by the state and therefore is acting on behalf of the state and is therefore a state agency in all relevant material fact it is a state agency
[01:36:32.440 --> 01:36:51.440]  okay if it is a state agency then under what branch of government does it operate and once again if all attorneys are automatically enrolled in the judicial branch by receiving that license and that bar card then their function can be only that of a judicial branch
[01:36:51.440 --> 01:37:12.440]  cannot be that of an executive branch so as still a separate state agency an attorney would still be in violation of article two by serving as a member of the legislature if he did not first surrender his license and his bar card so that he could not have a private law practice
[01:37:12.440 --> 01:37:28.440]  now let's swap the sides of the coin here let's say that the state now wants to claim that this bar association is all private it is not a government entity in any way shape or form it is entirely private
[01:37:28.440 --> 01:37:47.440]  fine this puts them in violations of the no monopolies clause in the state constitution because the bar card is the sole statewide authority for allowing the licensing and bar card carrying of an attorney
[01:37:47.440 --> 01:38:01.440]  they control it they control what the attorney can charge what his rates will be for any given thing they actually delegate all authority on how to charge and practice law within Texas
[01:38:01.440 --> 01:38:18.440]  so if they're a private agency they now have a total complete monopoly of the ability to practice law which the state constitution absolutely forbids no monopolies
[01:38:18.440 --> 01:38:34.440]  so another argument that was brought up well the courts have held that if it's a government control monopoly then it's okay well the problem with that argument was that in each example given was that the monopolies were a regional
[01:38:34.440 --> 01:38:53.440]  a particular section of the state not the entire state and I still see no exception within the language of the constitution granting a regional monopoly whether it's statewide or not it says no monopolies shall be allowed
[01:38:53.440 --> 01:39:12.440]  so geographically speaking it's irrelevant as to how much area they are or are not occupying as a monopoly so I wanted to get that out and get some people thinking that what this essentially means for all intents and purposes
[01:39:12.440 --> 01:39:28.440]  is that if an attorney can be shown to be holding any authority in a separate office other than that of the judicial that attorney is without authority to practice in court
[01:39:28.440 --> 01:39:43.440]  he's got to surrender one of the positions or everything that attorney is doing is a violation of the constitution of Texas the courts can argue however they like all day long to protect this monopoly
[01:39:43.440 --> 01:40:01.440]  but the people need to be aware that there is no common sense argument that says this is even remotely possible and not be in violation of the state constitution where we as the people specifically prohibited this kind of activity
[01:40:01.440 --> 01:40:17.440]  no matter which one of these activities it is we forbade it within the constitution and we demand that you adhere to it this should be good news to that group that Randy was talking about that is doing everything within their power
[01:40:17.440 --> 01:40:34.440]  to prevent attorneys from serving on the state legislature which is exactly what needs to happen the laws of this state are in a big enough mess because these attorneys are being self-serving in the way they get the laws written
[01:40:34.440 --> 01:40:51.440]  they basically make it where they are no longer understandable by the common man the average common man they now have ensured the necessity of having an attorney represent you in order for the law to be even remotely understood
[01:40:51.440 --> 01:41:06.440]  and then on that contemplative issue they've thrown your ability to defend yourself right out the window that is further compounded by the fact that the attorneys themselves normally do not bother to even read the dad gum law
[01:41:06.440 --> 01:41:32.440]  they just make their backroom deals throw you to the sharks collect their money and go to hell home and leave you hanging and the system is pre-arranged to allow all of that to exist and occur because we the people remain in the dark and unaware that they are violating the very rules we set up for them
[01:41:32.440 --> 01:41:48.440]  so that's really the only thing I've got to present but I wanted to get that argument out in the air and have people thinking about that because we are dawning rapidly to a point in our history as a republic
[01:41:48.440 --> 01:42:03.440]  and as a nation where these questions need to be demanded and answers received to them so that we can start regaining a semblance of control over those that we've put in office
[01:42:03.440 --> 01:42:20.440]  or that have managed to set the rules up in such a way that they have exclusive authority to be enrolled in a single branch of government imagine that other than the sheriff the constables and the deputy sheriffs
[01:42:20.440 --> 01:42:37.440]  no public no member of the people can be enrolled in the judicial branch of government the lawyers have arranged it in such a way that they are the only people allowed to occupy that branch of government
[01:42:37.440 --> 01:42:56.440]  and you wonder why you can't get justice in court when the lawyers control the courts and the writing of the laws that are used in the courts and make the laws written requiring interpretation by the same lawyers that wrote them
[01:42:56.440 --> 01:43:10.440]  in order to get them defended or argued before a court does anyone besides me see a very large problem with this
[01:43:10.440 --> 01:43:16.440]  I see a huge problem with it and it sounds like it's a violation of law too
[01:43:16.440 --> 01:43:35.440]  well from what I can tell it creates a violation of law in a constitutional sense the law itself that's allowing this now becomes a direct violation of the constitution and is therefore unconstitutional on its face
[01:43:35.440 --> 01:43:50.440]  I know that the Bible says woe unto lawyers for they have hidden the keys of knowledge from man from the ages and this is a clear example of it but we're unlocking it we're getting back the keys
[01:43:50.440 --> 01:44:05.440]  another good one Eddie another three pointer for Eddie alright we'll be right back
[01:44:05.440 --> 01:44:30.440]  aerial spraying chemtrails the modified atmosphere heavy metals and pesticides carcinogens and chemical fibers all falling from the sky you have a choice to keep your body clean detoxify with micro plant powder from hemp USA.org or call 908-691-2608
[01:44:30.440 --> 01:44:55.440]  it's odorless and tasteless and used in any liquid or food protect your family now with micro plant powder cleaning out heavy metals parasites and toxins order it now for daily intake and stock it now for long term storage visit hemp USA.org or call 908-691-2608 today
[01:45:00.440 --> 01:45:21.440]  hello oh man you're in jail you got busted man oh man I'm broke
[01:45:21.440 --> 01:45:46.440]  alright somebody's gonna police the police man that would be us we know Ja will he will help us and assist us in our quest for justice
[01:45:46.440 --> 01:45:54.440]  alright Eddie you had a couple more things to present on this issue and then we're going to take a couple of calls before the show is over go ahead Eddie
[01:45:54.440 --> 01:46:22.440]  yeah the only other thing I've got to go on this is I've talked before about the ability of a city attorney to act as an attorney for the state and I have written a motion to dismiss arguing that it is utterly impossible for there to be any lawful authority invested in a city attorney to act as an attorney for the state in accordance with law and the state constitution
[01:46:22.440 --> 01:46:47.440]  well code of criminal procedure article 2.07 speaks to the attorney pro tem and at that same location designates who is to be considered as an attorney for the state now under that it says that that is the district attorney the county attorney criminal district attorneys and in certain instances the assistant attorney general
[01:46:47.440 --> 01:47:13.440]  now the problem is is that the state constitution speaks only to county attorneys and district attorneys as being attorneys for the state okay which means that on its face the provisions of 2.07 allowing the assistant attorney general to act in the capacity of a prosecutor under the authority of the
[01:47:13.440 --> 01:47:35.440]  local district attorney or criminal district attorney means that that assistant attorney general is having to execute the powers of a judicial officer here's why that's a problem the office of attorney general is created under article four of the Texas Constitution the
[01:47:35.440 --> 01:47:53.440]  executive branch of government article five is the judicial branch of government article three is the legislative branch of government it stands to reason that if the office of attorney general is created under the executive branch he is therefore an
[01:47:53.440 --> 01:48:16.440]  executive officer and any assistant attorney generals appointed or working beneath him must also be executive branch officers therefore it is constitutionally impossible for 2.07 to be constitutional in allowing an assistant attorney general to assume
[01:48:16.440 --> 01:48:32.440]  prosecutorial powers as an attorney for the state under the office of the local criminal or district attorney it's just not constitutionally possible
[01:48:32.440 --> 01:48:52.440]  so again we have several provisions in several codes that show that the legislator is passing laws illegal on their face and I'm willing to bet that these were bills before they became statutes that were introduced by also then
[01:48:52.440 --> 01:49:13.440]  current members of the judicial branch of government employed as actual private attorneys and the smart bet would be not to bet against that but in any case if you got any comments calls or anything about that then please feel free to call in
[01:49:13.440 --> 01:49:29.440]  the remainder of the show Debra that's all I got okay and also tomorrow night we can talk about this tomorrow night we got about eight minutes left try to squeeze in a couple of calls here we got Kevin from California and then after Kevin we're going to go to
[01:49:29.440 --> 01:49:56.440]  Elise in Washington so Kevin go ahead what's on your mind? Oh yeah Eddie I'm glad you got my Skype on that because yeah the attorney general would fit right in with what you're talking about there and you know I'm thinking yeah that's good and now I'm thinking look I'm going to run for sheriff in Archer County up there in north there in Texas there next year or two here coming by too so be prepared for that guys
[01:49:56.440 --> 01:50:17.440]  Kevin's coming to town. That'd be cool. So you can cover the east side and I'll cover the north. Alright wait Archer County what's the big the county seat there? I'm not sure yet. That's up near Amarillo isn't it? Yeah it's up in the Panhandle area if I'm not mistaken.
[01:50:17.440 --> 01:50:46.440]  Along the northern border there yeah but yeah I was also you know that was a good thing to bring up there Eddie about these bar things and how it's a conflict of interest I'm also thinking that what's also a conflict of interest too is when the legislature says it's okay for a cop
[01:50:46.440 --> 01:51:08.440]  to go ahead and take you to jail because you don't have a license registration or insurance or you look like you're driving too fast or whatever else they want to scheme up basically since these officers have taken the position of stepping into office and taking the oath to uphold the Constitution
[01:51:08.440 --> 01:51:25.440]  that means that while they're on the street they must look at the Constitution and look at the laws that the legislature has created and then follow what the Constitution says if the statute is in derogation of that Constitution so I know you brought that up before
[01:51:25.440 --> 01:51:47.440]  but we've been talking about that for quite a while now so and that means any other officer that wants to get involved in trying to put you into some kind of court process too so whether it's a judge it's an animal control officer, a building inspector
[01:51:47.440 --> 01:52:07.440]  if they've taken the oath they have to look and compare the laws themselves before they do anything but most of them want to overlook that and for expediency's sake or for revenue raising and that's where we have a lot of things not only just with the transportation code here so
[01:52:07.440 --> 01:52:24.440]  All right very good. Pardon? Very good thank you Kevin. Sure, sure thanks okay great. All right thanks Kevin. Good comments. Yeah thanks okay good I'll let the next guy step up. Okay and remember we've got four hours tomorrow night as well callers.
[01:52:24.440 --> 01:52:33.440]  All right we're going now to Elise in Washington I hope I'm pronouncing her name right Elise. Thanks for calling in what's your comments?
[01:52:33.440 --> 01:53:00.440]  He actually answered what I was going to ask about the city attorneys and how they act you know for the state so he pretty much answered I look forward to hopefully listening to you guys tomorrow talk about it more and maybe what about the judge's position isn't that kind of a conflict too with getting paid by the cities or the counties?
[01:53:00.440 --> 01:53:10.440]  It depends on who the judge is the county and district judges are not paid by the counties they're paid by the state as is the district attorney and county attorney.
[01:53:10.440 --> 01:53:30.440]  But a municipal judge who works at the pleasure of the city is necessarily disqualified under Toomey, Ohio. Toomey v. Ohio and the decision on that one was written by Howard Taft.
[01:53:30.440 --> 01:53:33.440]  Is necessarily disqualified as what?
[01:53:33.440 --> 01:53:37.440]  As a neutral arbitrator.
[01:53:37.440 --> 01:53:56.440]  Since his position is affected by the pleasure of the council and he creates revenue for the council the city council then he is necessarily disqualified.
[01:53:56.440 --> 01:54:00.440]  So it's what the caller was going to.
[01:54:00.440 --> 01:54:02.440]  Okay that works for me.
[01:54:02.440 --> 01:54:04.440]  Toomey v. Ohio you said?
[01:54:04.440 --> 01:54:06.440]  Yes ma'am.
[01:54:06.440 --> 01:54:08.440]  T-U-M-I or?
[01:54:08.440 --> 01:54:10.440]  T-U-M-E-Y.
[01:54:10.440 --> 01:54:16.440]  It's a real famous case you Google that or exquick that and you'll get a hit right on it.
[01:54:16.440 --> 01:54:19.440]  Okay I'll look that up.
[01:54:19.440 --> 01:54:21.440]  And that's it for my questions.
[01:54:21.440 --> 01:54:23.440]  Thank you very much you guys.
[01:54:23.440 --> 01:54:25.440]  Yes ma'am.
[01:54:25.440 --> 01:54:28.440]  Okay very good.
[01:54:28.440 --> 01:54:36.440]  Okay we have one more caller on the line. We've got Gail from Minnesota.
[01:54:36.440 --> 01:54:42.440]  Gail we have about three minutes. What is your question or comment?
[01:54:42.440 --> 01:54:47.440]  Is Gail there?
[01:54:47.440 --> 01:54:53.440]  Okay she must have dropped off the line.
[01:54:53.440 --> 01:55:01.440]  All right I was just going to comment about this lawyer thing that issue that you brought up earlier Eddie.
[01:55:01.440 --> 01:55:07.440]  It's kind of like the same principle that I was discussing earlier concerning Title V.
[01:55:07.440 --> 01:55:09.440]  It can't be both.
[01:55:09.440 --> 01:55:10.440]  Exactly.
[01:55:10.440 --> 01:55:14.440]  There has to be a distinction. You have to pick one or the other.
[01:55:14.440 --> 01:55:20.440]  Otherwise there's too much power concentrated and centralized in one entity.
[01:55:20.440 --> 01:55:23.440]  We can't have that.
[01:55:23.440 --> 01:55:33.440]  Imagine if one person could exercise any power at any time of any branch of government and there was nothing to prevent that.
[01:55:33.440 --> 01:55:43.440]  They could basically assume any position several times a day and just swap behind them and basically control everything.
[01:55:43.440 --> 01:55:54.440]  If that was allowed the legislature could make themselves judges, juries and executioners of every statute they write.
[01:55:54.440 --> 01:55:58.440]  Well the president would love to be able to do that.
[01:55:58.440 --> 01:56:04.440]  I remember there was some executive order that came down from Bush when he was president.
[01:56:04.440 --> 01:56:15.440]  Something about the continuity of government where basically he was declaring that he could override all the other branches of government.
[01:56:15.440 --> 01:56:19.440]  This is just ridiculousness. This is just ludicrousness.
[01:56:19.440 --> 01:56:26.440]  There's nothing that gives him any authority under constitution to make such a declaration at all.
[01:56:26.440 --> 01:56:30.440]  Not to mention the fact that executive orders do not apply to we the people.
[01:56:30.440 --> 01:56:35.440]  They only apply to other members of the executive branch of government, i.e., his employees.
[01:56:35.440 --> 01:56:44.440]  The thing about that continuity, Deborah, is that I don't care how many signing statements he makes or how many executive orders he issues,
[01:56:44.440 --> 01:56:49.440]  he or Barack Obama either one.
[01:56:49.440 --> 01:56:55.440]  The point's going to come where the true continuity that sits on their head is going to be dispensed by the Almighty Lord
[01:56:55.440 --> 01:57:01.440]  and they are not going to like the end result of that application.
[01:57:01.440 --> 01:57:04.440]  I can guarantee you that.
[01:57:04.440 --> 01:57:12.440]  There is going to be a special place in hell reserved for the last few presidents that have had control of this country.
[01:57:12.440 --> 01:57:15.440]  And those serving in government with them.
[01:57:15.440 --> 01:57:22.440]  I agree. It's like Peter Tosh said in the song at the beginning of this show, talking about to the down presser man,
[01:57:22.440 --> 01:57:25.440]  you can run to the rocks, but the rocks will be melting.
[01:57:25.440 --> 01:57:28.440]  You can run to the sea, but the sea's going to be boiling.
[01:57:28.440 --> 01:57:30.440]  Down presser man.
[01:57:30.440 --> 01:57:36.440]  They murdered Peter Tosh. They assassinated him on 9-11, 1987.
[01:57:36.440 --> 01:57:40.440]  Unbelievable. In your face.
[01:57:40.440 --> 01:57:42.440]  Well, we're doing something about it.
[01:57:42.440 --> 01:57:43.440]  You see a lot of continuity with that date, too.
[01:57:43.440 --> 01:57:45.440]  Yeah, exactly.
[01:57:45.440 --> 01:57:50.440]  Overthrowing the democratically elected leader of Chile back in the day.
[01:57:50.440 --> 01:57:52.440]  It's ridiculous, man.
[01:57:52.440 --> 01:57:54.440]  You know, we're not stupid.
[01:57:54.440 --> 01:57:56.440]  And we're doing something about it.
[01:57:56.440 --> 01:58:01.440]  People have to take proactive action, just like what they're doing in Iceland.
[01:58:01.440 --> 01:58:05.440]  Y'all may want to listen to the archive from Tom Kiley's show from tonight.
[01:58:05.440 --> 01:58:11.440]  He interviewed a member of parliament tonight on his show.
[01:58:11.440 --> 01:58:13.440]  They're doing something about it.
[01:58:13.440 --> 01:58:17.440]  They're kicking the banksters out of the government, out of the country.
[01:58:17.440 --> 01:58:18.440]  I love it.
[01:58:18.440 --> 01:58:23.440]  All right, Gail, Mike, please call in tomorrow night.
[01:58:23.440 --> 01:58:25.440]  Other callers, call in tomorrow night.
[01:58:25.440 --> 01:58:28.440]  We've got four hours to answer your questions.
[01:58:28.440 --> 01:58:30.440]  Take your calls.
[01:58:30.440 --> 01:58:33.440]  Right now, stay tuned for endless fraud detection.
[01:58:33.440 --> 01:58:37.440]  And don't forget tomorrow morning, 7 to 10 a.m., Rise Up Radio,
[01:58:37.440 --> 01:58:44.440]  John Bush and Kathryn Bleich on the road exposing the fusion centers around the country.
[01:58:44.440 --> 01:58:47.440]  If you don't know what a fusion center is, you need to find out.
[01:58:47.440 --> 01:58:48.440]  Make it hip.
[01:58:48.440 --> 01:59:17.440]  We'll be back tomorrow night.
[01:59:18.440 --> 01:59:20.440]  We'll be right back.
[01:59:48.440 --> 01:59:59.440]  We'll be right back.