[00:00.000 --> 00:04.000]  The night must come before the day
[00:17.000 --> 00:22.000]  Solomon said, nothing that's new under the sun
[00:23.000 --> 00:27.000]  Don't let the system stop you from having fun
[00:27.000 --> 00:31.000]  The night must come before the day
[00:57.000 --> 01:01.000]  The night must come before the day
[01:27.000 --> 01:31.000]  The night must come before the day
[01:57.000 --> 02:01.000]  The night must come before the day
[02:27.000 --> 02:31.000]  Disqualification
[02:57.000 --> 03:01.000]  The night must come before the day
[03:27.000 --> 03:31.000]  The night must come before the day
[03:57.000 --> 04:01.000]  Okay
[04:27.000 --> 04:35.000]  Well, along with that updated narrative I sent you, I sent you a copy of a legal brief that I'm using in one of these traffic cases.
[04:35.000 --> 04:44.000]  And I have used the transportation code itself to prove that the people of Texas cannot be required to have a driver's license.
[04:44.000 --> 04:47.000]  And that's using their own statute.
[04:47.000 --> 04:56.000]  It is absolutely clear in there that the driver's license only applies as a commercial driver's license or an occupational license.
[04:56.000 --> 04:59.000]  It's got nothing to do with anything else.
[04:59.000 --> 05:05.000]  Then we need to use that so that you sue the judge personally.
[05:05.000 --> 05:10.000]  Yeah, it's all in that legal brief that I'm playing with that I sent you.
[05:10.000 --> 05:14.000]  It's one I'm drawing up because I'm fighting several different things in it.
[05:14.000 --> 05:20.000]  But that's the one I've got down to a total T and it's complete as far as the driver's license goes.
[05:20.000 --> 05:25.000]  Good, good. I want to see that. But it'll probably be Tuesday or Wednesday before I can get to it.
[05:25.000 --> 05:33.000]  That's not a problem. But I mean it's interesting reading because if you actually read the statute everywhere where it says driver's license,
[05:33.000 --> 05:38.000]  it all points back to exactly the same section of the transportation code.
[05:38.000 --> 05:49.000]  And that section very specifically says that a driver's license is a permit, temporary permit, and occupational license.
[05:49.000 --> 06:01.000]  So I was right when the policeman, I gave the policeman my ID. He figured out it was an ID and this was on a traffic stop and said, Mr.
[06:01.000 --> 06:07.000]  Kelton, this is a Texas ID. I said, yes, it is. Do you have a driver's license?
[06:07.000 --> 06:16.000]  And I got this from Gary Lochte. I said, yes, I do, but I'm not using it right now.
[06:16.000 --> 06:25.000]  And he stepped back and looked at me a minute and he said, Mr. Kelton, are you one of those guys? Yes, I am.
[06:25.000 --> 06:26.000]  In spades.
[06:26.000 --> 06:31.000]  He handed me back the ID. Have a nice day.
[06:31.000 --> 06:39.000]  Well, what originally prompted me on that was I got pulled over in Luskin, Texas. The police officer said I was speeding, which of course I told him immediately.
[06:39.000 --> 06:45.000]  There's no way I could be speeding. I'm in my private automobile. I'm not operating a motor vehicle governed by the speed sign.
[06:45.000 --> 06:48.000]  Well, he, of course, blew me off and ignored me.
[06:48.000 --> 06:58.000]  Then when he started demanding license and registration and all this other stuff, and I started asking him, if I provide this information to you, can you use it against me in a court of law?
[06:58.000 --> 07:04.000]  And he was like, I want this. And I kept asking that same question over and over again.
[07:04.000 --> 07:08.000]  And then finally he steps back, puts his hand on his gun and says, step out of the car.
[07:08.000 --> 07:14.000]  And by this time, four other police officers had joined him in the parking lot, all standing around with their hands on their gun.
[07:14.000 --> 07:24.000]  And I heard the dispatcher come over the radio when they called in my name, said use extreme caution with this individual.
[07:24.000 --> 07:29.000]  Extreme caution? What? What have I ever done for extreme caution?
[07:29.000 --> 07:36.000]  But in any case, they turned me, they took me out of the car and promptly arrested me and hauled me straight to the county jail.
[07:36.000 --> 07:40.000]  Well, we know what's going to happen there, aggravated kidnapping.
[07:40.000 --> 07:45.000]  Oh, one more. It's also going to be aggravated assault. Aggravated assault, yes.
[07:45.000 --> 07:58.000]  But on top of that, I got one of the deputy jailers down there to admit to me that this is their policy because the city has a contract with the jail to haul you in and hold you for eight hours.
[07:58.000 --> 08:05.000]  And at the end of eight hours, if you have not posted on, they must release you.
[08:05.000 --> 08:07.000]  Interesting.
[08:07.000 --> 08:24.000]  So we now have a contract that could be demanded for discovery that shows it is a preconceived conspiracy to deprive the people of their liberty for a set amount of time in order to take money from them.
[08:24.000 --> 08:25.000]  Incredible.
[08:25.000 --> 08:27.000]  We need to talk off the air.
[08:27.000 --> 08:31.000]  Incredible.
[08:31.000 --> 08:32.000]  This is going to be...
[08:32.000 --> 08:36.000]  Now we can start hitting him with commercial law.
[08:36.000 --> 08:41.000]  Yeah, because that's exactly what they've done. They took me outright.
[08:41.000 --> 08:50.000]  And I asked him, well, who maintains this contract? He told me. I'm pretty sure the state secretary has a copy of it.
[08:50.000 --> 08:52.000]  But that's in Luskin, Texas.
[08:52.000 --> 08:55.000]  Oh, wonderful.
[08:55.000 --> 09:15.000]  Not only am I going to sue the city for this, but there's going to be 60 or 70 some odd jailers of county jail that are also going to be hit because not a single one of them asked a arresting officer to steal a warrant or court order in order to imprison me in that cell.
[09:15.000 --> 09:16.000]  Incredible.
[09:16.000 --> 09:20.000]  They just locked me up because the cop said so.
[09:20.000 --> 09:24.000]  Well, I've got a stack of documents for you. I've got a lawsuit that I'd like to send you.
[09:24.000 --> 09:27.000]  Hey, be my guest. More of those, Mary.
[09:27.000 --> 09:29.000]  I've got about...
[09:29.000 --> 09:30.000]  Whoa.
[09:30.000 --> 09:31.000]  Whoa.
[09:31.000 --> 09:35.000]  We're getting a little bit of feedback here. Are you still there, Eddie?
[09:35.000 --> 09:36.000]  I'm here.
[09:36.000 --> 09:37.000]  Okay. All right, go ahead.
[09:37.000 --> 09:53.000]  It has about... This is over an arrest. And over one arrest was an outrageous arrest. I've got about 20 causes of... I'm sorry, not 20. I think I've got 14 causes of action.
[09:53.000 --> 10:10.000]  Separate causes of action. And one of them is negligent... Oh, what do they call it? Where they negligently gave someone an automobile.
[10:10.000 --> 10:35.000]  What I maintain is that the city was negligent when they allowed the police officer to drive a city-owned piece of motorized equipment because he used that piece of city-owned motorized equipment to facilitate the commission of the Criminal Act of Aggravated Kidnapping.
[10:35.000 --> 10:37.000]  Right. I like that.
[10:37.000 --> 10:44.000]  And that's important because there's only two times you can sue a city.
[10:44.000 --> 11:13.000]  Under Monell, when the city adopts a policy that acts in violation of law, or if a city employee creates a tort while operating a piece of city-owned motorized equipment. In that case, the city specifically under Civil Tort and Remedies 101
[11:13.000 --> 11:16.000]  waive their sovereign immunity from civil litigation.
[11:16.000 --> 11:19.000]  Well, in this case, we would have the city of Lufkin on both of those.
[11:19.000 --> 11:31.000]  Yes. In every case, we'll have them on both of those. And we got more. We got a breach of contract.
[11:31.000 --> 11:52.000]  Well, in the case of this arrest, they didn't even Mirandize me. They didn't read me my rights. They didn't anything. That's okay. They just all piled up on me, handcuffed me, threw me in the back of the cop car. Did they question? No. The thing about it is, of course, I told you, I carry a digital recorder with me everywhere I go. And when I come in contact with a public official, it's turned on.
[11:52.000 --> 12:04.000]  Well, these guys cleaned out my pockets and left that running leg on the top of my vehicle after they drove me off. I've still got them talking after I've left the scene.
[12:04.000 --> 12:05.000]  That's hilarious.
[12:05.000 --> 12:09.000]  And I've got all kinds of stuff on what their company is on tape.
[12:09.000 --> 12:13.000]  Wow. Eddie, could I get a copy of that?
[12:13.000 --> 12:15.000]  Sure. We'll play that on the air.
[12:15.000 --> 12:17.000]  We'll play it on the air. Heck yeah.
[12:17.000 --> 12:31.000]  There's an interesting thing for you here, Randy. Of course, I do computer repair, and I had a customer bring in her computer, and I have to back up the documents for these folks, including their videos and audios and music or whatever.
[12:31.000 --> 12:42.000]  Well, I've got a program that automatically trolls my server and collects music and videos. And one of the videos it recovered is from a city of Nacogdoche's police car.
[12:42.000 --> 12:43.000]  Really?
[12:43.000 --> 13:00.000]  This woman's married to one of the cops. I have that cop on videotape stating for the record that he has spent the whole day looking for his ticket quota and finally got a woman at the stop sign because she rolled through a stop sign.
[13:00.000 --> 13:13.000]  Randy, can Eddie technically legally use that information, use that video? Wouldn't Eddie need the person's permission since he got it from her computer?
[13:13.000 --> 13:15.000]  That's an interesting question.
[13:15.000 --> 13:17.000]  Not if it was brought to me of her own free will.
[13:17.000 --> 13:19.000]  That's what I was thinking.
[13:19.000 --> 13:30.000]  But wait a minute, I mean, is there some kind of stipulation? Yes, there's a waiver that I am allowed to maintain all of that stuff on my server.
[13:30.000 --> 13:36.000]  But are you allowed to distribute it or use it?
[13:36.000 --> 13:39.000]  It's an official government record. It can't be private.
[13:39.000 --> 13:42.000]  But wait a minute, but you didn't get that from...
[13:42.000 --> 13:45.000]  Wait a minute, that's a dash cam. It doesn't matter where he got it.
[13:45.000 --> 13:46.000]  Are you sure?
[13:46.000 --> 13:48.000]  If it's a dash cam?
[13:48.000 --> 13:50.000]  Yeah, it's directly out of the cop's camera.
[13:50.000 --> 13:52.000]  We own the camera that took it.
[13:52.000 --> 13:54.000]  Right.
[13:54.000 --> 13:55.000]  Yeah, that's public.
[13:55.000 --> 14:00.000]  Well, yeah, but okay. So if it's from the dash cam, then he can use it without her permission?
[14:00.000 --> 14:04.000]  Yes. That's public information anyway.
[14:04.000 --> 14:09.000]  I would suggest you not get into that. How long ago was this thing?
[14:09.000 --> 14:12.000]  Which one, my case or this video?
[14:12.000 --> 14:14.000]  No, this video. How old?
[14:14.000 --> 14:17.000]  Last year, 2008.
[14:17.000 --> 14:24.000]  Well, it's been admitted that the cops have a quota.
[14:24.000 --> 14:28.000]  I mean, that's one of the platform principles that Raymond...
[14:28.000 --> 14:29.000]  Okay.
[14:29.000 --> 14:35.000]  That's one of the principles that Raymond Frank was running on when he was running for sheriff this last election was to eliminate the quotas.
[14:35.000 --> 14:37.000]  Suggestion.
[14:37.000 --> 14:39.000]  Request from the department.
[14:39.000 --> 14:40.000]  That day?
[14:40.000 --> 14:44.000]  No, not the day. The quota.
[14:44.000 --> 14:45.000]  Oh my gosh.
[14:45.000 --> 14:50.000]  And they're going to tell you they don't have it.
[14:50.000 --> 14:53.000]  Gotcha, Bubba.
[14:53.000 --> 14:55.000]  They will absolutely tell you they don't have a quota.
[14:55.000 --> 14:56.000]  Really?
[14:56.000 --> 15:02.000]  And do it in an information request because he can lie to you.
[15:02.000 --> 15:11.000]  But if you request it under an information request and he fails to provide it, that's a Class A misdemeanor.
[15:11.000 --> 15:15.000]  But I've got him saying they don't have it on the witness stand.
[15:15.000 --> 15:18.000]  Oh, that's the felony.
[15:18.000 --> 15:20.000]  Perjury there.
[15:20.000 --> 15:23.000]  This is the same cop?
[15:23.000 --> 15:27.000]  No, this is a different cop in a different case.
[15:27.000 --> 15:28.000]  Same department?
[15:28.000 --> 15:34.000]  But he's saying his department does not have a quota when he has a brother police officer saying exactly the opposite.
[15:34.000 --> 15:37.000]  Oh boy.
[15:37.000 --> 15:47.000]  Okay, this is where you go after the officer for aggravated perjury and you sue him.
[15:47.000 --> 15:53.000]  Hey, speaking of aggravated perjury, Randy, I have a question too that's somewhat related.
[15:53.000 --> 16:04.000]  I have a friend who was trying to fight a traffic ticket and they had the cop go in and testify on the witness stand in the case.
[16:04.000 --> 16:16.000]  And my friend was upset because the cop was wearing a pistol on her hip inside the courtroom, inside the courthouse, and on the witness stand too.
[16:16.000 --> 16:19.000]  And he was wondering, well, what's the deal?
[16:19.000 --> 16:25.000]  He thought that there were no weapons allowed inside the courthouse, especially inside the courtroom.
[16:25.000 --> 16:31.000]  So how come this cop is allowed to walk around with a pistol in the courtroom?
[16:31.000 --> 16:32.000]  What's up with that?
[16:32.000 --> 16:39.000]  I have raised a specific objection to that in the past and every time the judge made the officer take off the pistol.
[16:39.000 --> 16:51.000]  I mean, didn't they start banning pistols from court or weapons in general from courthouses anyway because some lawyer got mad and shot everybody?
[16:51.000 --> 16:57.000]  There's another problem with that too, Deborah, and that is if they're testifying while wearing their uniform.
[16:57.000 --> 17:09.000]  Yeah, and my friend had an issue with that too because they're supposed to be filing the criminal complaint as a citizen or as an individual, not in their capacity as a police officer.
[17:09.000 --> 17:13.000]  So when they're on the witness stand, how come, number one, why are they wearing the pistol?
[17:13.000 --> 17:15.000]  Number two, why are they in uniform anyway?
[17:15.000 --> 17:23.000]  Because they're supposed to be testifying in their capacity as a person, as an individual.
[17:23.000 --> 17:30.000]  And he was also upset because the prosecutor kept addressing this person as officer so-and-so, officer so-and-so,
[17:30.000 --> 17:35.000]  but they're supposed to be testifying and filing the criminal complaint in their capacity as an individual.
[17:35.000 --> 17:41.000]  And I said, well, yeah, but just to take Devil's Advocate for a minute, that's the person's job.
[17:41.000 --> 17:44.000]  It's their title. It's like saying Dr. So-and-so.
[17:44.000 --> 17:54.000]  And he said, well, yeah, well, then I want everybody to call me a computer analyst, specialist, so-and-so when they're addressing me in court.
[17:54.000 --> 17:57.000]  And I said, you got a good point.
[17:57.000 --> 18:00.000]  I'm not representing the agency that's accusing you in court.
[18:00.000 --> 18:01.000]  Exactly.
[18:01.000 --> 18:11.000]  I used to live right next door to City Hall, and the justice of the peace was one of my favorite human beings on earth.
[18:11.000 --> 18:14.000]  But she always found me incredibly guilty.
[18:14.000 --> 18:19.000]  I went to court once in my Air Force uniform.
[18:19.000 --> 18:22.000]  I could barely fit in it.
[18:22.000 --> 18:29.000]  I got in court, and the judge asked me what I was doing wearing that.
[18:29.000 --> 18:31.000]  I said, well, I like it.
[18:31.000 --> 18:34.000]  Well, Mr. Kelton, are you still in the military?
[18:34.000 --> 18:37.000]  I said, no, not anymore, but it's mine.
[18:37.000 --> 18:41.000]  Well, Mr. Kelton, I don't feel like you're appropriately dressed.
[18:41.000 --> 18:44.000]  And I pointed to the police officer just before the court started.
[18:44.000 --> 18:50.000]  Well, he's not either then. Make him get out of his, I'll get out of mine.
[18:50.000 --> 18:53.000]  She said, OK, wear your uniform.
[18:53.000 --> 18:54.000]  Yeah.
[18:54.000 --> 18:58.000]  That was a hoot. We had a great time. They found me guilty.
[18:58.000 --> 18:59.000]  Yeah.
[18:59.000 --> 19:00.000]  That's because I was.
[19:00.000 --> 19:08.000]  I found also, Randy, that they do in traffic court that I have found the actual statute that forbids what they've been doing.
[19:08.000 --> 19:21.000]  You know, generally when the cop is getting ready to testify, the first thing they have him do or somebody do is to set up the television and the video player so that you can see his camera and everything that went on.
[19:21.000 --> 19:35.000]  There is a specific place in the Code of Criminal Procedure that says if that officer did not mirandize you, any statement or video collected during the interview is inadmissible.
[19:35.000 --> 19:37.000]  Oh.
[19:37.000 --> 19:42.000]  You were not advised of your rights of testifying against yourself.
[19:42.000 --> 19:48.000]  And it is absolutely outside of the judge's discretion as to whether or not to admit that evidence.
[19:48.000 --> 19:50.000]  Oh, yeah. Good.
[19:50.000 --> 20:02.000]  The judge is completely barred from admitting it if the oath or the Miranda rights were not read to the defendant before the recording and questioning began.
[20:02.000 --> 20:03.000]  Wow.
[20:03.000 --> 20:04.000]  Wonderful.
[20:04.000 --> 20:06.000]  Well, listen, here's another issue, too.
[20:06.000 --> 20:13.000]  Speaking of having equipment in the courtroom, this was another issue that my friend brought up.
[20:13.000 --> 20:23.000]  He was saying that the prosecutor is supplied with a computer, a laptop at his table during these hearings.
[20:23.000 --> 20:25.000]  It's not his personal laptop.
[20:25.000 --> 20:30.000]  It's not his personal computer and Internet connection and all this kind of stuff.
[20:30.000 --> 20:35.000]  And he was like, well, how come the prosecutor gets that and my defense attorney doesn't?
[20:35.000 --> 20:42.000]  Or if I'm doing pro se, I want the state to provide me with a laptop and Internet connection, too, at my table.
[20:42.000 --> 20:47.000]  So what's up with that, Randy?
[20:47.000 --> 20:49.000]  That's an interesting.
[20:49.000 --> 20:51.000]  That's not really that's not really fair.
[20:51.000 --> 20:53.000]  That's not really fair at all.
[20:53.000 --> 21:07.000]  I don't think I mean, and this is this is the court that's providing it, not not just like the is this isn't part of like the budget of the executive branch to the prosecutor, which that would be fair.
[21:07.000 --> 21:12.000]  But this was the court that was supplying this to the prosecutor.
[21:12.000 --> 21:15.000]  Well, I thought the court was supposed to be unbiased and impartial.
[21:15.000 --> 21:23.000]  If they're giving the prosecutor a laptop and Internet connection, I think they need to give the defense, the defendant the same thing.
[21:23.000 --> 21:24.000]  Absolutely.
[21:24.000 --> 21:28.000]  Especially when we're paying for it with our tax dollars.
[21:28.000 --> 21:30.000]  Well, I agree with all of that.
[21:30.000 --> 21:38.000]  I've also found a reference, Randy, where it says that the prosecutor has to be an attorney for the state.
[21:38.000 --> 21:39.000]  Yes.
[21:39.000 --> 21:44.000]  So the problem is, in order to be an attorney for the state, you have to be elected to that office.
[21:44.000 --> 21:50.000]  No, in municipal court, you can be appointed.
[21:50.000 --> 21:55.000]  That's the only place the municipal court specifically states a city attorney.
[21:55.000 --> 22:04.000]  However, the research that I've been doing on this, there's a there's a two problems with that coin on both sides there.
[22:04.000 --> 22:11.000]  If the city attorney can prosecute a state offense, they have a problem.
[22:11.000 --> 22:20.000]  Because from what I'm reading, the city attorney can prosecute a criminal act only against a city ordinance in municipal court.
[22:20.000 --> 22:22.000]  Yeah, that makes sense.
[22:22.000 --> 22:28.000]  A criminal act must be prosecuted by an attorney for the state, which is your county attorney or your district attorney.
[22:28.000 --> 22:30.000]  Do you have that briefed?
[22:30.000 --> 22:33.000]  I don't. Well, I don't have it right in front of me.
[22:33.000 --> 22:37.000]  Email me the argument.
[22:37.000 --> 22:40.000]  Yeah, and email me that audio file, too.
[22:40.000 --> 22:47.000]  Yeah, and anything you have in support of it, it'll go into my research folders.
[22:47.000 --> 22:54.000]  And when I get to traffic, that's one of the things I'll brief out. That is a very good argument.
[22:54.000 --> 22:56.000]  That's the kind of arguments I like to make.
[22:56.000 --> 22:58.000]  Yeah, really?
[22:58.000 --> 23:09.000]  That's not the mumbo jumbo magic potion legal reform argument.
[23:09.000 --> 23:13.000]  That's the kinds of arguments that attorneys make.
[23:13.000 --> 23:17.000]  Yeah, signing in red ink and all this kind of nonsense.
[23:17.000 --> 23:25.000]  Yeah, I mean, from what I'm seeing in this, that city attorney does not have the authority to prosecute in the name of the state.
[23:25.000 --> 23:28.000]  He can only prosecute in the name of the city.
[23:28.000 --> 23:35.000]  And that fits that he can only prosecute city ordinances.
[23:35.000 --> 23:38.000]  It's not under his jurisdiction.
[23:38.000 --> 23:45.000]  Correct. He's not an official elected to represent the state in criminal cases.
[23:45.000 --> 23:49.000]  Only the county attorney and the district attorney qualify for that position.
[23:49.000 --> 23:56.000]  That's why they're the only ones specifically mentioned in the Code of Criminal Procedure as being attorneys for the state.
[23:56.000 --> 24:00.000]  They're defined as attorneys for the state. No one else is.
[24:00.000 --> 24:03.000]  A city attorney or not a private attorney.
[24:03.000 --> 24:08.000]  And that's why county attorneys prosecute in JP courts.
[24:08.000 --> 24:10.000]  Correct.
[24:10.000 --> 24:12.000]  That is a good argument.
[24:12.000 --> 24:15.000]  Yep.
[24:15.000 --> 24:20.000]  I mean, it's amazing what you can discover if you actually learn to read what these idiots have tried to hide.
[24:20.000 --> 24:26.000]  Yeah. And the more you read it, the more of those things you come across.
[24:26.000 --> 24:29.000]  I'm sitting here. I was looking for some information.
[24:29.000 --> 24:37.000]  I'm looking through some I got some responses from the DPS on my information requests.
[24:37.000 --> 24:46.000]  And I have here a statement from the officer that responded to my call at the State Department.
[24:46.000 --> 25:06.000]  And he says on February 18th, 2009, approximately three thirty two p.m. I officer in Genuo Cruz received a radio call from DPS communications about a Randall Kelton wanting to meet with a trooper at the rudder building in room B 205 at phone number blah, blah, blah.
[25:06.000 --> 25:13.000]  I made contact with Kelton in B 205 and at five and advised him he needed to leave.
[25:13.000 --> 25:17.000]  I then told him that a criminal trespass warning would be issued.
[25:17.000 --> 25:19.000]  Kelton refused to leave.
[25:19.000 --> 25:27.000]  He was then arrested and transported to Travis County Jail for criminal trespass.
[25:27.000 --> 25:29.000]  And that's not exactly what happened either.
[25:29.000 --> 25:31.000]  Not even close.
[25:31.000 --> 25:35.000]  That is, I mean, you were trying to leave and they wouldn't let you.
[25:35.000 --> 25:39.000]  And they all have personal recording devices.
[25:39.000 --> 25:43.000]  That's when we're talking about perjury.
[25:43.000 --> 25:44.000]  Gotcha, Bubba.
[25:44.000 --> 25:49.000]  Well, see Article 45.201 is where it deals strictly with municipal prosecutions.
[25:49.000 --> 25:56.000]  And it says all prosecutions in the municipal court shall be conducted by the city attorney of the municipality or by deputy city attorney.
[25:56.000 --> 26:07.000]  Now, what we were talking about before about them just hiring any Tom, Dick and Harry attorney that doesn't even live in the same town to act as a city attorney and prosecute a case in their court.
[26:07.000 --> 26:09.000]  The statute doesn't allow that.
[26:09.000 --> 26:17.000]  There's nothing here that allows them to hire anyone other than the city or deputy city attorney to do a municipal prosecution.
[26:17.000 --> 26:32.000]  Except it also says the county attorney of the county in which the municipality is situated may, if the county attorney so desires, also represent the state in such prosecution.
[26:32.000 --> 26:39.000]  But our county attorney refuses to do it because he doesn't get paid for those types of cases in municipal court.
[26:39.000 --> 26:42.000]  And that's also covered in the statute.
[26:42.000 --> 26:49.000]  The county attorney is not entitled to receive any fees or other compensation for those services.
[26:49.000 --> 26:56.000]  But there's nothing that allows them to hire an outside attorney that's not associated with the city as a prosecutor.
[26:56.000 --> 27:02.000]  And that goes to the proposition that they may only do what they are specifically authorized to do.
[27:02.000 --> 27:07.000]  Exactly. Therefore, your prosecutor is now impersonating a public official.
[27:07.000 --> 27:09.000]  Oh, wonderful.
[27:09.000 --> 27:12.000]  Incredible. Good work, Eddie.
[27:12.000 --> 27:14.000]  Hey, I try.
[27:14.000 --> 27:17.000]  And I'm also being very trying to these people.
[27:17.000 --> 27:19.000]  Good for you.
[27:19.000 --> 27:26.000]  And I am looking forward to going after, to working on your deal to go after the tax collector.
[27:26.000 --> 27:33.000]  Yeah. Article 38.23, Randy, is where that evidence may not be used, section is.
[27:33.000 --> 27:37.000]  Of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 38.23.
[27:37.000 --> 27:41.000]  Any evidence secured in violation of law?
[27:41.000 --> 27:45.000]  Yeah, I'm familiar with that one.
[27:45.000 --> 27:52.000]  In violation of any law, it cannot be, yeah, yeah. I've got that in my briefs.
[27:52.000 --> 28:04.000]  Yeah, and there is an accompanying section of that that specifically limits the judge to no discretion as to whether or not that evidence is admissible.
[28:04.000 --> 28:14.000]  Then that gives us, if we don't tell the judge, because he is deemed to know the law.
[28:14.000 --> 28:17.000]  Correct. I like that part of it, too.
[28:17.000 --> 28:23.000]  So if he violates the law, it must be presumed he did it with full knowledge.
[28:23.000 --> 28:27.000]  He's essentially, he's screwed.
[28:27.000 --> 28:38.000]  Screws versus U.S. says if a public official violates ruling of this court and he be sane, he may not be heard to say he knows not what he does.
[28:38.000 --> 28:39.000]  So wonderful.
[28:39.000 --> 28:50.000]  Yeah, and just one other thing. My friend is chatting me that had those issues about the cops in the court wearing pistols and wearing uniforms and the prosecutor.
[28:50.000 --> 28:56.000]  He said that it wasn't a laptop, that it was a permanent built in installation.
[28:56.000 --> 29:02.000]  The computer was like built into the prosecutor's desk at the court.
[29:02.000 --> 29:05.000]  So obviously it's supplied by the court.
[29:05.000 --> 29:06.000]  Yeah.
[29:06.000 --> 29:10.000]  Ridiculous. All right. Thanks, Eddie. Do you have anything else for us?
[29:10.000 --> 29:16.000]  Yeah, there was one other thing that goes towards standing in that court, Randy.
[29:16.000 --> 29:19.000]  Do you know who Mark Stevens is?
[29:19.000 --> 29:20.000]  I should.
[29:20.000 --> 29:21.000]  The No State Project.
[29:21.000 --> 29:24.000]  Yeah. Yeah, same guy.
[29:24.000 --> 29:29.000]  He actually has some very valid points in what he's got that he uses.
[29:29.000 --> 29:36.000]  And I used some of those arguments, but I used Texas law to facilitate them in the courtroom down here.
[29:36.000 --> 29:43.000]  And it took the judge three weeks to come back and deny my motions because she couldn't understand the point of what I was trying to make.
[29:43.000 --> 29:56.000]  This woman sat there on the bench after I tried to make her understand that without criminal intent as being one of the elements of a crime, she has no corpus delecti for the crime.
[29:56.000 --> 30:07.000]  Now, this woman has sat there on the bench and told the entire courtroom that I have fully read your motions, and after due consideration, they are summarily denied.
[30:07.000 --> 30:22.000]  And then in the same breath, when I start challenging how she can deny them when she has no standing and the officer doesn't have standing, and I bring up the issue of corpus delecti, she looks right at the prosecutor and says, what is a corpus delecti?
[30:22.000 --> 30:27.000]  Now, I've got seven pages in this brief that describe what it is.
[30:27.000 --> 30:31.000]  Obviously, this woman has not read the brief. She just told the court that she had.
[30:31.000 --> 30:37.000]  Okay. Next time that happens, you need to pull a Tony Davis owner.
[30:37.000 --> 30:43.000]  He told the federal judge, you obviously didn't read the brief.
[30:43.000 --> 30:48.000]  Oh, no. He asked the judge to disqualify himself, and he said, why should I disqualify myself?
[30:48.000 --> 30:52.000]  Well, you're sleeping with a 26-year-old prostitute.
[30:52.000 --> 30:55.000]  Well, where do you get that?
[30:55.000 --> 31:02.000]  He told him on page 26, paragraph six, he grabbed the motion and flipped it open.
[31:02.000 --> 31:06.000]  He's looking through it, and it's not there.
[31:06.000 --> 31:10.000]  Obviously, you didn't read the motion, Judge.
[31:10.000 --> 31:15.000]  Anyway, I thought that was one of my favorite tricks.
[31:15.000 --> 31:21.000]  Accused the judge of something really outrageous and tell her what page it's on,
[31:21.000 --> 31:26.000]  and she'll look and say, well, it's not there. You should have known that.
[31:26.000 --> 31:33.000]  Yeah. Well, the last thing I've got for you is, now, you've used the official oppression statute before.
[31:33.000 --> 31:37.000]  Have you ever attached that to the abuse of official capacity?
[31:37.000 --> 31:44.000]  Well, abuse of official capacity and official oppression are essentially the same thing.
[31:44.000 --> 31:51.000]  Official oppression basically is abuse of official capacity,
[31:51.000 --> 32:00.000]  except official oppression applies when they're denying an individual in a right, and it's a higher offense.
[32:00.000 --> 32:04.000]  This is what I've read up on that part of it.
[32:04.000 --> 32:09.000]  Official oppression is a misdemeanor, okay?
[32:09.000 --> 32:19.000]  Abuse of official capacity, if you get the value of the equipment they use to commit that oppression in excess of $1,500 at the state jail felony.
[32:19.000 --> 32:22.000]  Wait a minute. Abuse of...?
[32:22.000 --> 32:29.000]  No, I'm thinking you are right. I'm thinking official misconduct.
[32:29.000 --> 32:34.000]  Right. Abuse of official capacity carries felony penalties
[32:34.000 --> 32:40.000]  depending upon the value of the materials, personnel, equipment,
[32:40.000 --> 32:47.000]  everything they use to commit the official oppression has a monetary value associated with it.
[32:47.000 --> 32:51.000]  As that value rolls up, so does the penalty.
[32:51.000 --> 32:55.000]  What's the statute for official abuse of official capacity?
[32:55.000 --> 32:57.000]  3903.
[32:57.000 --> 32:59.000]  No, that's official oppression.
[32:59.000 --> 33:01.000]  3902, then.
[33:01.000 --> 33:06.000]  That's official misconduct. Abuse of official capacity.
[33:06.000 --> 33:15.000]  Abuse of official capacity and official oppression are consecutive in the book.
[33:15.000 --> 33:18.000]  Okay, okay. Then we're thinking of the same thing.
[33:18.000 --> 33:28.000]  Generally, that used to be, in most states, you'll find that as official misconduct.
[33:28.000 --> 33:33.000]  Just recently they changed it to abuse of official capacity.
[33:33.000 --> 33:37.000]  Official misconduct, Randy, is actually in a different part of the statute in the penal code.
[33:37.000 --> 33:43.000]  There is a separate section for it. They're not the same charge.
[33:43.000 --> 33:48.000]  The official misconduct is a Class A misdemeanor.
[33:48.000 --> 33:52.000]  Right. I'm talking felony.
[33:52.000 --> 33:59.000]  Let's see. It is specifically 3902, abuse of official capacity.
[33:59.000 --> 34:05.000]  A public servant commits an offense if, with intent to obtain a benefit or with intent to harm or defraud another,
[34:05.000 --> 34:12.000]  he intentionally or knowingly violates the law relating to the public servant's office or employment
[34:12.000 --> 34:21.000]  or misuses government property, services, personnel, or any other thing of value belonging to the government.
[34:21.000 --> 34:28.000]  If you look down through there, an offense under this section, by the monetary value that's involved, determines the penalty.
[34:28.000 --> 34:36.000]  If it exceeds $100,000, it's a second degree. If it exceeds $200,000, it's a first degree.
[34:36.000 --> 34:45.000]  That used to be official misconduct. They changed the name of it just recently.
[34:45.000 --> 34:58.000]  Yeah. And that's generally, in the case law, applies to a public official misusing government funds.
[34:58.000 --> 35:05.000]  I don't think we can get it if he doesn't misuse the funds directly.
[35:05.000 --> 35:16.000]  It says misuses government property, services, personnel, or any other thing of value belonging to the government
[35:16.000 --> 35:23.000]  that has come into the public servant's custody or possession by virtue of the public servant's office or employment.
[35:23.000 --> 35:26.000]  That's everything right down the paper clip.
[35:26.000 --> 35:32.000]  Misuses is going to be the term we need to brief out. What do they mean by misuse?
[35:32.000 --> 35:38.000]  Well, certainly, if they're using it to commit a crime, I would say that's misuse.
[35:38.000 --> 35:45.000]  There you go. That aggravated assault we were talking about a moment ago. Five police cars.
[35:45.000 --> 36:01.000]  I mean, to me, misuse would be anything, any use other than what it's specifically designated for in the capacity of a public servant.
[36:01.000 --> 36:11.000]  As I put in that narrative I gave you on the sales tax, Randy, I seriously doubt that authorized activities
[36:11.000 --> 36:15.000]  includes the commission of multiple Class A misdemeanors and felonies.
[36:15.000 --> 36:18.000]  Yeah, no kidding. I think that's reasonable.
[36:18.000 --> 36:28.000]  We know that if they exceed an authority or commit a crime, that doesn't fall within scope.
[36:28.000 --> 36:35.000]  If a cop goes and robs a bank and uses a cop car as a getaway car, that's a misuse.
[36:35.000 --> 36:43.000]  I mean, certainly, it would be misuse if they use anything like that to commit a crime.
[36:43.000 --> 36:49.000]  Yeah, and actually, Randy, from what my understanding is, the police cars, the way they're equipped nowadays,
[36:49.000 --> 36:52.000]  those cars are almost $75,000 apiece.
[36:52.000 --> 36:55.000]  It gets up there pretty quick.
[36:55.000 --> 37:00.000]  And once they hit $200,000, it's all over.
[37:00.000 --> 37:06.000]  Wow, because a first degree felony is 20 to life in Texas.
[37:06.000 --> 37:09.000]  Yeah, but that's for each count of misuse.
[37:09.000 --> 37:14.000]  Whew!
[37:14.000 --> 37:18.000]  All right, Eddie, do you have anything else for us? Because our call board is stacking up again.
[37:18.000 --> 37:20.000]  Burned your ears up enough tonight.
[37:20.000 --> 37:21.000]  All right, thanks, Eddie.
[37:21.000 --> 37:22.000]  Yes, ma'am.
[37:22.000 --> 37:26.000]  There we go. Just a second. I'm going into Lexus.
[37:26.000 --> 37:30.000]  I'm going to pull up 3902 and look at the annotations.
[37:30.000 --> 37:39.000]  And callers really do appreciate y'all hanging in there. We've got some real troopers here on the line.
[37:39.000 --> 37:51.000]  Penal code. That misuses is going to be the key term there.
[37:51.000 --> 37:54.000]  Okay, we'll tell you what. Why don't we hit a break for a second?
[37:54.000 --> 38:00.000]  Why don't we maybe go to a break while you're looking this up, Randy?
[38:00.000 --> 38:04.000]  And then we'll continue to take the calls. What do you say?
[38:04.000 --> 38:05.000]  Yeah, yeah.
[38:05.000 --> 38:06.000]  Is that all right?
[38:06.000 --> 38:10.000]  Yeah, I'll go over it while we're on the break. I've got it up.
[38:10.000 --> 38:14.000]  Okay, all right. We're going to hit a break here for just a couple minutes.
[38:14.000 --> 38:17.000]  Randy, 3901 defines the term misuse.
[38:17.000 --> 38:25.000]  Ah, okay. 3901. Okay. I want to come back from break. I should have it ready.
[38:25.000 --> 38:26.000]  Okay.
[38:26.000 --> 38:35.000]  Okay. Excellent. Excellent. Okay. If y'all want to hang on the line, callers, we're going to hit a break for just a couple of minutes.
[38:35.000 --> 38:37.000]  This is incredible.
[38:37.000 --> 38:39.000]  First one. Yes.
[38:39.000 --> 38:49.000]  Okay, we'll be right back. We're going to go to Dominic, Marcus, Joe, and Scott.
[38:49.000 --> 38:56.000]  And we'll try to be succinct with everyone so we don't keep everyone up till 3 o'clock in the morning. Okay, Randy?
[38:56.000 --> 38:57.000]  Okay.
[38:57.000 --> 39:10.000]  All right, we'll be right back.
[39:27.000 --> 39:42.000]  All right.
[39:42.000 --> 39:57.000]  All right.
[39:57.000 --> 40:12.000]  All right.
[40:12.000 --> 40:27.000]  All right.
[40:27.000 --> 40:42.000]  All right.
[40:42.000 --> 40:57.000]  All right.
[40:57.000 --> 41:12.000]  All right.
[41:12.000 --> 41:27.000]  All right.
[41:27.000 --> 41:42.000]  All right.
[41:42.000 --> 41:57.000]  All right.
[41:57.000 --> 42:12.000]  All right.
[42:12.000 --> 42:27.000]  All right.
[42:27.000 --> 42:42.000]  All right.
[42:42.000 --> 42:57.000]  All right.
[42:57.000 --> 43:12.000]  All right.
[43:12.000 --> 43:27.000]  All right.
[43:27.000 --> 43:42.000]  All right.
[43:42.000 --> 43:57.000]  All right.
[43:57.000 --> 44:12.000]  All right.
[44:12.000 --> 44:27.000]  All right.
[44:27.000 --> 44:42.000]  All right.
[44:42.000 --> 44:57.000]  All right.
[44:57.000 --> 45:12.000]  All right.
[45:12.000 --> 45:32.000]  All right.
[45:42.000 --> 46:05.000]  All right.
[46:05.000 --> 46:22.000]  All right.
[46:22.000 --> 46:28.000]  Okay, we are back. Extended edition of the rule of law.
[46:28.000 --> 46:37.000]  We've got more callers. People keep stacking up on the caller board and listeners, callers really, really appreciate it.
[46:37.000 --> 46:43.000]  You guys and ladies are real troopers and very educated and well researched.
[46:43.000 --> 46:47.000]  So we really appreciate it. It's good to see.
[46:47.000 --> 46:53.000]  All right. We're going to move. We're going to go now. We've got Dominic, Marcus, Joe, Scott from Connecticut.
[46:53.000 --> 47:00.000]  We're going to go to Dominic in Texas. Unless, unless Eddie had something quickly to finish up.
[47:00.000 --> 47:04.000]  Let me, let me just make sure. Eddie, did you have anything else? Did you want us to say?
[47:04.000 --> 47:09.000]  I've got one of the things that I had an epiphany of while we were talking here, Randy.
[47:09.000 --> 47:18.000]  If you're aware that it's sometimes hard to prove criminal, criminal collusion between these to get them under organized criminal activity, correct?
[47:18.000 --> 47:24.000]  Well, actually you don't have to prove that. You just have to. That's one of the things you don't have to prove.
[47:24.000 --> 47:34.000]  Well, would you believe that the tax code of Texas actually has a section that mandates collusion by departments?
[47:34.000 --> 47:38.000]  Eleven dot zero zero five. It's in that narrative I sent you.
[47:38.000 --> 47:43.000]  But what got me thinking about that was you know how they love to run up the charges on us.
[47:43.000 --> 47:46.000]  So if they can't get one to stick, they've got other ones to fall back on.
[47:46.000 --> 47:55.000]  Yeah. Well, if we take the same tack, if a police officer assists someone like the comptroller in an act
[47:55.000 --> 48:05.000]  for which that comptroller person has never provided a warrant or a court order that shows they have the authority to do that act
[48:05.000 --> 48:13.000]  and that officer assists them, can't you charge that officer with criminal negligence?
[48:13.000 --> 48:21.000]  Because it would be his duty to make sure that the act was officially allowed when he proceeded to execute it?
[48:21.000 --> 48:29.000]  We can charge the officer with acting without subject matter jurisdiction, impersonating a public official.
[48:29.000 --> 48:34.000]  Right. But like I said, if they want to rack up the ante on us, I don't see why we can't reciprocate.
[48:34.000 --> 48:40.000]  That's exactly what I try to do. I look for every teensy-teensy little crappy complaint I can file. The more crappy it is.
[48:40.000 --> 48:50.000]  I've got about three dozen against these guys and about six of them are Class A's and everything else are felon.
[48:50.000 --> 49:02.000]  I'm looking through the annotations here under 3902.
[49:02.000 --> 49:10.000]  Even if assault was lesser included in offense of Texas Penal Code 3902,
[49:10.000 --> 49:17.000]  there was sufficient evidence to show a violation of civil rights of the prisoner by defendant 3902A1
[49:17.000 --> 49:24.000]  by act of forcibly pulling prisoner's head back by prisoner's hair.
[49:24.000 --> 49:35.000]  But that goes to 3902A, a prisoner. I guess once you're arrested, once they put you under arrest, then you become a prisoner.
[49:35.000 --> 49:36.000]  Your state property?
[49:36.000 --> 49:48.000]  Yes. And then 3902A applies where abuse of official capacity applies once you've been arrested.
[49:48.000 --> 50:00.000]  So yeah, we can get them. But what I can't find and what I'm not sure of is if we can claim the value of the property used,
[50:00.000 --> 50:10.000]  if the property was incidental and the value of the property actually was not a relevant factor.
[50:10.000 --> 50:19.000]  It's not like they took a $100,000 piece of equipment out and used it to do a job where they receive financial gain from it.
[50:19.000 --> 50:25.000]  Well, this is how the end of each of the offense sections read regarding the value.
[50:25.000 --> 50:33.000]  If the value of the use of the thing misused is less than the money amount and greater than this money amount.
[50:33.000 --> 50:43.000]  So it actually talks about the value of the use of the thing. For instance, if it takes $150 an hour to run that car,
[50:43.000 --> 50:50.000]  then during its use to commit that crime, that value is added up.
[50:50.000 --> 50:57.000]  That's good. I'm trying to find a way to pull in the actual value of the automobile.
[50:57.000 --> 51:06.000]  That's what I was trying to do originally also, but it actually doesn't show the full value of the item.
[51:06.000 --> 51:09.000]  It's specifically limited to the use at that time.
[51:09.000 --> 51:15.000]  So the cost of use. It would be hard to get us up that high.
[51:15.000 --> 51:22.000]  We can claim it. This is a great argument. You always ask for more than you expect to win.
[51:22.000 --> 51:23.000]  Exactly.
[51:23.000 --> 51:34.000]  So we claim the full value of the automobile that's used because the automobile was used to facilitate the criminal act.
[51:34.000 --> 51:40.000]  And it takes that much money to produce a piece of equipment that they use to commit the criminal act with.
[51:40.000 --> 51:48.000]  Right. But I mean, what this statute goes toward, from what I can see in it, Randy, you can cover everything.
[51:48.000 --> 51:54.000]  How much that cop's getting paid by the hour? How much his gun cost him if his department issued?
[51:54.000 --> 52:00.000]  How much the bullets in it were? Right down to the pad he wrote the citation on.
[52:00.000 --> 52:10.000]  Everything they're using during the commission of that criminal act that has a value can be assessed toward the amount of that penalty.
[52:10.000 --> 52:17.000]  Oh, that would be this. This is wonderful. This goes for some really interesting Brady.
[52:17.000 --> 52:21.000]  I want to see him do discovery to try to add it all up. Yeah, that's what Brady Brady discovery.
[52:21.000 --> 52:25.000]  That's a really interesting discovery.
[52:25.000 --> 52:31.000]  And because when you ask for that discovery, the prosecutors going to object.
[52:31.000 --> 52:39.000]  And that's when you get to lower the boom on them and show why you need that discovery.
[52:39.000 --> 52:44.000]  Yeah, that should put them quaking in their boots when they figure out exactly what you're going after.
[52:44.000 --> 52:49.000]  OK, well, listen, Eddie, we should probably move on because Dominic just dropped off the line and he was next.
[52:49.000 --> 52:54.000]  I feel really bad. He's been holding for like an hour. All right. He was holding for like an hour. OK. OK.
[52:54.000 --> 52:59.000]  Thanks, Eddie. Yes, ma'am. You have a good night. OK, Dominic, if you're still listening, I'm sorry.
[52:59.000 --> 53:06.000]  We'll take you next as soon as you call in. All right. We're going to go now to Marcus in Virginia.
[53:06.000 --> 53:14.000]  Hey, Marcus. Hi, I got another traffic case here.
[53:14.000 --> 53:20.000]  Want me to go over it again? Yeah, I vaguely remember your traffic tickets.
[53:20.000 --> 53:24.000]  I went through a stop sign by accident, had the sun in my eyes.
[53:24.000 --> 53:30.000]  They towed my vehicle and charged me with not having a license.
[53:30.000 --> 53:37.000]  That's $46.2 to $300 in the Virginia Code. But what I want to bring up is the rule 101,
[53:37.000 --> 53:42.000]  which goes to the applicability of the entire title.
[53:42.000 --> 53:55.000]  It says this title shall apply to any vehicle or any person operating or owning a vehicle operated on any toll facility
[53:55.000 --> 54:01.000]  controlled by the Department of Transportation or any political subdivision of the Commonwealth.
[54:01.000 --> 54:07.000]  There's got another provision that's similar, but it relates to parking facilities.
[54:07.000 --> 54:17.000]  So, but let's see. Yeah, I got a case here that says that the title must be read as a whole.
[54:17.000 --> 54:25.000]  And he mentioned already about the what? Terameteria. Yeah. Yeah.
[54:25.000 --> 54:32.000]  Anyway, he also said that I could bring up double jeopardy.
[54:32.000 --> 54:35.000]  They already towed my vehicle and charged me for it.
[54:35.000 --> 54:41.000]  Yeah, they towed your vehicle without giving you opportunity to secure it.
[54:41.000 --> 54:47.000]  So they've already punished you. Now they want to prosecute you and punish you again.
[54:47.000 --> 54:53.000]  So that you can make the allegation to double jeopardy.
[54:53.000 --> 55:02.000]  All right. But also, can I get the officer for aggravated perjury?
[55:02.000 --> 55:11.000]  You know, it seems to me that if you can say that, you know, this section of the code doesn't apply to me.
[55:11.000 --> 55:14.000]  He's saying that it does. Would that be perjury?
[55:14.000 --> 55:22.000]  Not necessarily. If he said it to you, no, because he's not talking to you under oath.
[55:22.000 --> 55:36.000]  Perjury only goes to statements of material fact made under oath and stating that a statute doesn't apply to him.
[55:36.000 --> 55:43.000]  Even if he was under oath, that's an opinion. It's not a statement of fact.
[55:43.000 --> 55:49.000]  So, no, I don't think we could get him for aggravated perjury on that.
[55:49.000 --> 56:01.000]  Now, if he lied about material facts in the case, like the one I just read where he said that I was ordered to leave the building and I refused.
[56:01.000 --> 56:09.000]  And I was arrested for criminal trespass. Now, that's aggravated perjury on its face.
[56:09.000 --> 56:13.000]  Because I was arrested outside.
[56:13.000 --> 56:19.000]  All right. What about a Brady violation against the prosecutor?
[56:19.000 --> 56:31.000]  Doesn't they have evidence that this vehicle was ever owned or operated on a parking facility, a toll facility?
[56:31.000 --> 56:39.000]  Wait a minute. The prosecutor is only required to produce evidence he intends to use in court.
[56:39.000 --> 56:44.000]  No, that's not exactly true. Generally, the judge will only hold them to that.
[56:44.000 --> 56:53.000]  They're also required to produce any evidence they have, whether it would be exculpatory or not.
[56:53.000 --> 57:00.000]  So, okay, say that again. You felt he withheld?
[57:00.000 --> 57:15.000]  Well, potentially exculpatory evidence. I'm just saying, doesn't they have evidence that this vehicle was ever even operated on a toll facility?
[57:15.000 --> 57:21.000]  Because otherwise, none of this title even applies.
[57:21.000 --> 57:24.000]  Wait, on a what facility?
[57:24.000 --> 57:34.000]  Toll facility. That's rule 101 is the first rule on the entire title. Because the applicability of the title.
[57:34.000 --> 57:38.000]  And it only applied to toll roads? Is that?
[57:38.000 --> 57:43.000]  Toll facilities and parking facilities.
[57:43.000 --> 57:46.000]  And you were on a public thoroughfare.
[57:46.000 --> 57:48.000]  Right.
[57:48.000 --> 57:57.000]  That's an interesting turn of events. And somehow it's not intuitive.
[57:57.000 --> 58:07.000]  You would expect them to write the statute to apply to streets and thoroughfares and not just specifically to toll facilities.
[58:07.000 --> 58:17.000]  Is there potentially another statute that applies the transportation code to streets and thoroughfares?
[58:17.000 --> 58:21.000]  Oh, you just want me to read the one that they charged me with?
[58:21.000 --> 58:22.000]  Yeah.
[58:22.000 --> 58:24.000]  Okay.
[58:24.000 --> 58:43.000]  Well, this is just a provision that it's charged out with. It says, that person accepts those expressly, blah, blah, blah, shall drive any motor vehicle on any highway in the Commonwealth until such person applies for a driver's license, blah, blah, blah.
[58:43.000 --> 58:59.000]  Any violation of this section of the Class II misdemeanor and upon eviction they can, let's see, the court may suspend the person's privilege to drive for a period not exceeding 90 days.
[58:59.000 --> 59:14.000]  But I don't see where it says, there's other, there's definitely other parts of the title where it says if a person does less than such, then they shall be guilty of a crime. It uses that phrase. I don't see that phrase.
[59:14.000 --> 59:22.000]  Well, it designated a violation as a Class B misdemeanor.
[59:22.000 --> 59:27.000]  Yeah, but it doesn't say who that should apply to.
[59:27.000 --> 59:30.000]  Who?
[59:30.000 --> 59:41.000]  In the only place that I can see in this title where you can say this applies to somebody is in Rule 101.
[59:41.000 --> 59:44.000]  Wait a minute, this is not making sense.
[59:44.000 --> 59:51.000]  They put these two together and that tells you where this misdemeanor or the penalty for that misdemeanor should apply.
[59:51.000 --> 59:57.000]  What, doesn't the statute say that on a street and highway?
[59:57.000 --> 01:00:05.000]  Well, that's just a provision. I mean, it doesn't say who the penalty for the crime should apply to.
[01:00:05.000 --> 01:00:15.000]  Oh, you're saying that because it doesn't specifically state that the penalty applies to the driver of the vehicle?
[01:00:15.000 --> 01:00:26.000]  I'm saying that the first provision that says no person shall, say no person shall drive any motor vehicle on the highway of the Commonwealth.
[01:00:26.000 --> 01:00:30.000]  I'm saying that's just a provision, okay? That's defining what the crime is.
[01:00:30.000 --> 01:00:31.000]  Yes.
[01:00:31.000 --> 01:00:41.000]  But it doesn't say, you know, who the penalty should apply to.
[01:00:41.000 --> 01:00:46.000]  The only place where I can answer that question is in Rule 101.
[01:00:46.000 --> 01:00:49.000]  Okay, read Rule 101 again.
[01:00:49.000 --> 01:01:11.000]  This title shall apply to any vehicle or any person operating or owning a vehicle operated on any toll facility controlled by the Department of Transportation or any political subdivision of the Commonwealth.
[01:01:11.000 --> 01:01:15.000]  The second provision just relates to parking facilities.
[01:01:15.000 --> 01:01:22.000]  Well, were you in a subdivision of the Commonwealth?
[01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:26.000]  Yeah, but not a toll facility.
[01:01:26.000 --> 01:01:29.000]  Well, it said or.
[01:01:29.000 --> 01:01:36.000]  Or any facility controlled by the Department or any political subdivision of the Commonwealth.
[01:01:36.000 --> 01:01:51.000]  It said or, so that got you into the jurisdiction. It doesn't seem to apply just to streets and thoroughfares. It seems to apply to the entire jurisdiction.
[01:01:51.000 --> 01:02:00.000]  Well, I think that's referring to toll facilities of the Department of Transportation or toll facilities of the Commonwealth.
[01:02:00.000 --> 01:02:21.000]  No, no, no, no, you can't do that. You can't do that. It said toll facilities. Had the legislature met toll facilities of the Commonwealth or the subdivision, they would have said toll division, toll facilities of the subdivision.
[01:02:21.000 --> 01:02:27.000]  Because the statute would be exclusive.
[01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:30.000]  Okay, that's not what I read originally.
[01:02:30.000 --> 01:02:36.000]  What we need to do is look at case law on that. We need to go to a legal library and look up the statute in it.
[01:02:36.000 --> 01:02:39.000]  Wait a minute. I can look it up.
[01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:41.000]  Let me go back to switch.
[01:02:41.000 --> 01:02:42.000]  And we have a couple other callers, too, Randy.
[01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:45.000]  Okay, I'll do this quick.
[01:02:45.000 --> 01:02:52.000]  In any case, they want to stay away from this rule. They don't even want to discuss it.
[01:02:52.000 --> 01:02:56.000]  They don't want to ever do anything that's difficult.
[01:02:56.000 --> 01:03:01.000]  Okay, Virginia, this is what code is it in?
[01:03:01.000 --> 01:03:03.000]  It's the title 46.2.
[01:03:03.000 --> 01:03:06.000]  No, no, what is the code?
[01:03:06.000 --> 01:03:08.000]  The Virginia code.
[01:03:08.000 --> 01:03:10.000]  Code of Virginia.
[01:03:10.000 --> 01:03:12.000]  All right.
[01:03:12.000 --> 01:03:14.000]  Forty-two.
[01:03:14.000 --> 01:03:16.000]  Forty-six dot two.
[01:03:16.000 --> 01:03:21.000]  Forty-six dot two, motor vehicles.
[01:03:21.000 --> 01:03:25.000]  Okay, and what code? Which one is it?
[01:03:25.000 --> 01:03:34.000]  Rule 101 and rule 300.
[01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:38.000]  Man, this thing is hard to figure out.
[01:03:38.000 --> 01:03:46.000]  Rule, powers, motor vehicle.
[01:03:46.000 --> 01:03:48.000]  Well, listen, Randy, do you want to do...
[01:03:48.000 --> 01:03:50.000]  This is going to take too long.
[01:03:50.000 --> 01:03:55.000]  Yeah, yeah, because we're like in overtime mode here. We have some other callers on the line.
[01:03:55.000 --> 01:04:00.000]  Well, can I just say one other thing, because you brought it up earlier? This is a separate issue.
[01:04:00.000 --> 01:04:11.000]  If a policeman ever wants to question your child, and it's a young child, just pick him up, put him on your shoulders, and tell him, fire away.
[01:04:11.000 --> 01:04:14.000]  That's a good idea.
[01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:16.000]  That's what I would do.
[01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:18.000]  Hard to do with a 14-year-old, but...
[01:04:18.000 --> 01:04:23.000]  Right, yeah, but I got a six-year-old.
[01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:24.000]  Anyway.
[01:04:24.000 --> 01:04:26.000]  All right, thank you, Marcus.
[01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:28.000]  Okay, thanks.
[01:04:28.000 --> 01:04:34.000]  Okay, we're going to move on now. We have two more callers, and Dominic, again, sorry, please call back in.
[01:04:34.000 --> 01:04:38.000]  We'll have to go to... Next time Dominic calls in, he's first on the agenda.
[01:04:38.000 --> 01:04:41.000]  Okay, we're going to go to Joe in Texas.
[01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:46.000]  Hey, Joe, thanks for holding, and again, listeners and callers, you guys are real troopers.
[01:04:46.000 --> 01:04:54.000]  You're very well researched and knowledgeable, and we appreciate you all hanging on the line and waiting to talk to us on the air.
[01:04:54.000 --> 01:04:56.000]  So go ahead, Joe.
[01:04:56.000 --> 01:05:06.000]  Hi. I'm going to be staging a protest to end the Fed tomorrow, along with some other people.
[01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:26.000]  And I wanted to know, Randy, how you would handle something where the police tell you that you don't have a permit to protest in front of the Federal Reserve building, but not on the property, on the sidewalk, out, you know, just less than 10 feet from the curb.
[01:05:26.000 --> 01:05:32.000]  How do you do that without... You don't have to have a permit, but how do you do that without being arrested?
[01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:35.000]  Where... What Federal Reserve building?
[01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:38.000]  San Antonio.
[01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:53.000]  That's a good question because Deb and I got... Well, actually, I got real close to being arrested in Fort Lauderdale when we were trying to take some photos on the Federal property.
[01:05:53.000 --> 01:05:57.000]  You're saying there is no requirement in...
[01:05:57.000 --> 01:05:59.000]  San Antonio.
[01:05:59.000 --> 01:06:05.000]  Well, have you had this experience before where they would try to tell you that you needed a permit?
[01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:25.000]  Not me personally, but they were doing something else near Federal property where they were using a megaphone or whatever you call it, bullhorn, and they were protesting about 9-11 in San Antonio.
[01:06:25.000 --> 01:06:30.000]  And the Feds came out and gave them a hard time?
[01:06:30.000 --> 01:06:34.000]  No, no, no. This wasn't the Fed. This was the... What do you call it?
[01:06:34.000 --> 01:06:36.000]  City? City police?
[01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:37.000]  State police.
[01:06:37.000 --> 01:06:53.000]  Well, wait a minute, wait a minute. Where are you planning on protesting? Is the... Okay, first off, find out if the sidewalk in front of the Federal Reserve building is actually owned by the City of San Antonio.
[01:06:53.000 --> 01:07:08.000]  If it's actually part of the public property or if the Federal Reserve building itself or the Federal government owns the sidewalk too.
[01:07:08.000 --> 01:07:25.000]  Okay, because we had this experience in Fort Lauderdale where we were trying to film on the sidewalk in front of the Federal courthouse and they said, no, this isn't public city property. This is owned by the Federal government.
[01:07:25.000 --> 01:07:32.000]  So first off, you've got to find out if the sidewalk is actually owned by the Federal government or if it's owned by the City of San Antonio.
[01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:40.000]  If it's owned by the City of San Antonio, then you shouldn't need a permit from the Federal government or the state or whatever to protest.
[01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:44.000]  I believe this property was owned... The whole thing was owned by the Federal government.
[01:07:44.000 --> 01:07:52.000]  Well, then you're going to have to deal with the Feds then. If the sidewalk is owned by the City of San Antonio, then you're free in the clear.
[01:07:52.000 --> 01:08:08.000]  Now, see, I've run into this situation at the Capitol building here in Austin, the state Capitol. You can protest or demonstrate or gather or whatever on the grounds of the Capitol without a permit.
[01:08:08.000 --> 01:08:20.000]  But if you want to actually stand on the steps of the Capitol or on the porch there when you walk up the steps before you enter the front door, then you have to have a permit from the state.
[01:08:20.000 --> 01:08:29.000]  So you have to look at who actually owns the property. And if it's owned by the City, you should be free in the clear and you shouldn't need a permit from anyone.
[01:08:29.000 --> 01:08:44.000]  Second question to this. Best of my knowledge, we own the Alamo. The people of the Republic of Texas, all the people of this Republic of Texas own the Alamo. Is that correct or incorrect?
[01:08:44.000 --> 01:08:45.000]  I don't know.
[01:08:45.000 --> 01:08:48.000]  It's bought and paid by us for us.
[01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:52.000]  Yes, we technically, all of the citizens own the Alamo.
[01:08:52.000 --> 01:09:06.000]  We were not allowed to march. We also tried to march into the and distribute information and made our invoices known in the Alamo and we were stopped. We were not allowed to go in.
[01:09:06.000 --> 01:09:08.000]  By who? The city police or state?
[01:09:08.000 --> 01:09:09.000]  State.
[01:09:09.000 --> 01:09:20.000]  Okay. Well, again, like I said, when I gave the example of protesting or demonstrating on the steps of the Capitol building, we own that too, but they require a permit.
[01:09:20.000 --> 01:09:31.000]  And the reason that they do that is to prevent multiple groups from trying to protest at the same time and arguing with each other about who has the right to be there or whatever.
[01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:43.000]  So if the property is owned by the state, they may try to require you to have a permit to demonstrate or protest or whatever.
[01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:47.000]  And I don't necessarily agree with that.
[01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:56.000]  But there shouldn't be anything to stop individuals from going on the Alamo grounds and talking to people and handing out pamphlets on their own.
[01:09:56.000 --> 01:10:05.000]  And if there just happens to be a group of many individuals talking about the same thing to people, then they're going to have a problem.
[01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:12.000]  But if it's like an organized protest with speakers and stuff, then you may run into some difficulty.
[01:10:12.000 --> 01:10:17.000]  You need to check the statute. Check the law and the matter.
[01:10:17.000 --> 01:10:25.000]  If the Alamo is under the direction control of the state and not the city of San Antonio, then you have to deal with state law.
[01:10:25.000 --> 01:10:26.000]  Yeah, that's true.
[01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:42.000]  Well, I have a Texas criminal laws book produced by Gold Publications. Would it be in that?
[01:10:42.000 --> 01:10:47.000]  No, this wouldn't be in criminal law. This would be civil law.
[01:10:47.000 --> 01:10:52.000]  I'm not sure where I would look for this. It's probably in government code.
[01:10:52.000 --> 01:10:55.000]  Oh, great. And how would I find that?
[01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:09.000]  You can find that on the Internet. Just do iXquick, Texas statutes, and you go to the state site and list all the statutes.
[01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:14.000]  And there may even be a link to all of that from the Alamo website.
[01:11:14.000 --> 01:11:29.000]  Okay, I'm sorry. iXquick. Go to startpage.com. Startpage.com. Yeah, no Google. No Google.
[01:11:29.000 --> 01:11:31.000]  Okay, startpage.com.
[01:11:31.000 --> 01:11:35.000]  Yeah, the search engine is iXquick. iXquick.
[01:11:35.000 --> 01:11:47.000]  U-I-C-K. Yes. And that's iXquick.com. Yes, dot com. Yes, dot com.
[01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:50.000]  Okay. All right. Is that all, Joe?
[01:11:50.000 --> 01:11:52.000]  A lot more questions, and thank you for...
[01:11:52.000 --> 01:11:54.000]  You have more questions, you said?
[01:11:54.000 --> 01:12:04.000]  I have a lot more, but I'll email Randy because that's backbound what I told you about running for city council and trying to expose the city council.
[01:12:04.000 --> 01:12:06.000]  Oh, right, right.
[01:12:06.000 --> 01:12:15.000]  The entertainment center without using just the correct funds and the correct avenue to use those funds.
[01:12:15.000 --> 01:12:21.000]  Right. Well, like I was telling you earlier, under open records, request these financial records.
[01:12:21.000 --> 01:12:27.000]  If you know what date they made the checkout to that contractor,
[01:12:27.000 --> 01:12:34.000]  then go in there and look at the financial records during that time frame and get and find the check.
[01:12:34.000 --> 01:12:47.000]  And if it came, if it was cut from the account that was set up to fund other projects specifically and exclusively, then you can nail them.
[01:12:47.000 --> 01:12:59.000]  No, no, no, no. That's not... It came from other... It came from other... How do I explain this?
[01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:07.000]  It came from other funding to fund the entertainment center.
[01:13:07.000 --> 01:13:17.000]  There wasn't funds coming out of the entertainment center going anywhere. There were other funds coming from the general obligation fund.
[01:13:17.000 --> 01:13:19.000]  Because they can probably do that.
[01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:25.000]  Yeah, they probably can unless there's something specifically in place to say they can't.
[01:13:25.000 --> 01:13:43.000]  It is specific in the meetings, in the special meeting they held back on August, September. I mean, excuse me, September the 26th, 2006 or 2007.
[01:13:43.000 --> 01:13:51.000]  It doesn't matter what every month, year was, but it's very specific in the meetings of the minute.
[01:13:51.000 --> 01:14:05.000]  But what it says, the exact... What you called it, I forgot what you called it, in the financial arrangement of that legal stance, I don't know.
[01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:15.000]  But I do know in the meeting that made the specifications for the actual meeting to call for a post-bond election,
[01:14:15.000 --> 01:14:21.000]  it says in there the amount, it says where the funds are supposed to come from,
[01:14:21.000 --> 01:14:30.000]  and the person I'm running against is also the person that chaired the meeting and swayed the other members to vote in favor of.
[01:14:30.000 --> 01:14:39.000]  Yeah, but see, you can't charge them with misuse of funds, regardless of what they said.
[01:14:39.000 --> 01:14:44.000]  It's not what they said. It has to be in writing in some type of...
[01:14:44.000 --> 01:14:56.000]  Exactly. The funds they used have to be specifically restricted and designated specifically for some other purpose.
[01:14:56.000 --> 01:15:02.000]  Yeah, that's the point I was trying to make about the check cut to the contractor.
[01:15:02.000 --> 01:15:10.000]  If they have general funds or funds that aren't specifically restricted, they can use those pretty much anywhere they want to.
[01:15:10.000 --> 01:15:21.000]  Yeah, unless the project for this entertainment center, unless it says regarding the financing of it somewhere,
[01:15:21.000 --> 01:15:27.000]  that it can only be funded through this particular fund.
[01:15:27.000 --> 01:15:33.000]  Oh, that's in the agreement between the city and the... I'll show it to you later.
[01:15:33.000 --> 01:15:42.000]  That's in the agreement between the city and the construction company. That's in there.
[01:15:42.000 --> 01:15:50.000]  Yeah, but that doesn't have anything to do with the appropriations set up of the fund itself.
[01:15:50.000 --> 01:15:56.000]  The agreement essentially has to be between the city and the taxpayer and the voter.
[01:15:56.000 --> 01:16:03.000]  Well, it's a three-way... I understand that you still have to have another agreement. I understand. And I have to find that.
[01:16:03.000 --> 01:16:05.000]  Yes, that's what we're saying. Yes.
[01:16:05.000 --> 01:16:06.000]  Okay. Thank you, sir.
[01:16:06.000 --> 01:16:11.000]  Okay, thank you, Joe. All right, we got one more caller. We got Scott from Connecticut.
[01:16:11.000 --> 01:16:15.000]  Scott, thanks for holding on the line. What's on your mind tonight?
[01:16:15.000 --> 01:16:20.000]  Hey, no problem. I really had to switch over because I lost you on the listen line.
[01:16:20.000 --> 01:16:24.000]  Oh, okay. Yeah, the listen line switches over.
[01:16:24.000 --> 01:16:29.000]  Well, when I'm thinking about it, if I can't afford a computer, isn't one supposed to be provided for me?
[01:16:29.000 --> 01:16:33.000]  Well, that's what happens with a prosecutor.
[01:16:33.000 --> 01:16:40.000]  Anyway, I have a thought. Eddie's a computer guy. If I could somehow get somebody to fire off an email for me,
[01:16:40.000 --> 01:16:44.000]  maybe he could hook us up and maybe Eddie could ship one up here pretty cheap.
[01:16:44.000 --> 01:16:50.000]  Probably can. You can probably find them at the local junk stores pretty cheap.
[01:16:50.000 --> 01:16:59.000]  Why don't you look up Goodwill computers because they have a, there's pretty much a Goodwill's computers in most cities now,
[01:16:59.000 --> 01:17:04.000]  and you can pick up a relatively inexpensive, good quality computer there.
[01:17:04.000 --> 01:17:10.000]  Thanks for the tip. I also had a tip for Marcus. I think I brought this up one other time.
[01:17:10.000 --> 01:17:18.000]  I don't know if he's still listening or not, but if he looks into the DOT traffic codes on that deal up there with that stop sign,
[01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:24.000]  and he might find out that that's an illegal stop sign. Maybe they haven't done a traffic study.
[01:17:24.000 --> 01:17:28.000]  I hope he's still listening, but the DOT codes are pretty easy to find.
[01:17:28.000 --> 01:17:30.000]  Yeah, he's still on the lines.
[01:17:30.000 --> 01:17:34.000]  That's good, yeah, for most states. In other words, it might be an illegal stop sign.
[01:17:34.000 --> 01:17:40.000]  All stop signs are supposed to have little initials per order of selectmen or something like that.
[01:17:40.000 --> 01:17:46.000]  They're supposed to be a certain size. All kinds of stuff you could find on that.
[01:17:46.000 --> 01:17:51.000]  When was the last time they did a traffic survey or study for that area?
[01:17:51.000 --> 01:17:54.000]  And then you can subpoena these people.
[01:17:54.000 --> 01:17:58.000]  Yeah, make them produce all those records. That'll really drive them crazy.
[01:17:58.000 --> 01:17:59.000]  Yeah.
[01:17:59.000 --> 01:18:01.000]  They want to cost you money, you cost them more money.
[01:18:01.000 --> 01:18:06.000]  Yeah, I mean, you know, when you get the, when you get the Department of Transportation Commissioner
[01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:13.000]  has to take a day off of work to go to court and bring documents and could make it very interesting.
[01:18:13.000 --> 01:18:14.000]  Exactly.
[01:18:14.000 --> 01:18:20.000]  Anyway, thanks for the tip on the computer. I got to do something here.
[01:18:20.000 --> 01:18:25.000]  Right. Well, I'm a computer tech too, but I'm sorry, I don't have time.
[01:18:25.000 --> 01:18:32.000]  I mean, I have a freelance business where I do computer consulting for people, but I'm kind of swamped right now.
[01:18:32.000 --> 01:18:37.000]  I could build you a computer, but it would probably be better for you to just go to the Goodwill computer,
[01:18:37.000 --> 01:18:42.000]  especially if you're, well, you're in Connecticut, but look up Goodwill computers.
[01:18:42.000 --> 01:18:44.000]  Like the regular Goodwill where you get used clothes?
[01:18:44.000 --> 01:18:49.000]  Yeah. And there's, it's actually here in Austin, they call it Computer Works.
[01:18:49.000 --> 01:18:53.000]  And it's right next door to the Goodwill, the main Goodwill here in Austin.
[01:18:53.000 --> 01:19:00.000]  And they've got really decent computers for good prices. You can pick up a really nice P4 for a couple hundred bucks.
[01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:04.000]  Whatever that is. I'm not like a real...
[01:19:04.000 --> 01:19:09.000]  A P4 is next to the fast, next to the latest stuff.
[01:19:09.000 --> 01:19:15.000]  Okay. Yeah, just whatever you do, don't get a computer that has Vista on it. It's horrible.
[01:19:15.000 --> 01:19:22.000]  It has a what? That has Vista or Vista. It's the latest Windows operating system.
[01:19:22.000 --> 01:19:28.000]  Well, actually now they're about to release another one called Windows 7 or something or Vista 7.
[01:19:28.000 --> 01:19:32.000]  And I'm sure it's going to be even worse, but yeah, get something that has XP on it.
[01:19:32.000 --> 01:19:38.000]  XP. Yeah, XP. Or yeah, if you're going to get something with Windows on it, get XP.
[01:19:38.000 --> 01:19:43.000]  Don't get something with Vista. Just remember, Asta la Vista, okay?
[01:19:43.000 --> 01:19:46.000]  Asta la Vista, baby. Don't get anything with Vista on it.
[01:19:46.000 --> 01:19:53.000]  Especially if you haven't had a lot of experience with configuring computers because it'll be a nightmare, I promise you.
[01:19:53.000 --> 01:19:58.000]  Okay. Yeah, if you get one from Goodwill, it'll most likely have XP on it.
[01:19:58.000 --> 01:20:06.000]  Most likely. But if you get one that's like a newer computer, like a dual core or something, it'll probably have Vista on it.
[01:20:06.000 --> 01:20:09.000]  But just don't get anything with Vista on it.
[01:20:09.000 --> 01:20:12.000]  Mine's got Vista on it, and it's giving me a fit.
[01:20:12.000 --> 01:20:19.000]  Yeah, I know how to configure Vista to keep it under control, but I mean, you have to really know what you're doing.
[01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:27.000]  Oh, I had one other thought about Eddie there. Remember he was talking about how we turned up like that videotape or something on the computer?
[01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:29.000]  Oh yeah, that was great.
[01:20:29.000 --> 01:20:40.000]  Does a person in his position have a legal obligation to report a crime if he notices it like that?
[01:20:40.000 --> 01:20:43.000]  That's not a crime.
[01:20:43.000 --> 01:20:45.000]  What's that?
[01:20:45.000 --> 01:20:48.000]  Having a quota is not a crime.
[01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:49.000]  Oh, all right.
[01:20:49.000 --> 01:20:57.000]  The quota itself is not a crime. Now, writing tickets that are inappropriate in order to secure the quota, that would be the quota.
[01:20:57.000 --> 01:21:08.000]  Okay, all right. I was just thinking, in other words, like I've heard of a lot of cases where people have got their computers, brought them in for repair, and the computer guy finds all kinds of weird stuff on there.
[01:21:08.000 --> 01:21:11.000]  Yeah, and they're supposed to report it.
[01:21:11.000 --> 01:21:12.000]  Yeah.
[01:21:12.000 --> 01:21:21.000]  So never use Internet Explorer. It keeps secret stuff in there.
[01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:31.000]  Yeah, well, if I do get a computer, I'll probably have to, maybe I can get some information from somebody who knows what they're doing. I've heard about that Internet Explorer thing there or whatever that records stuff.
[01:21:31.000 --> 01:21:33.000]  Yeah, I could give you some tips.
[01:21:33.000 --> 01:21:51.000]  The only thing I ever use Internet Explorer for is open it up, download Mozilla, close it, install Mozilla, and never touch Internet Explorer. Every once in a great, great while, I come across something that has to use Explorer for something other.
[01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:59.000]  Yeah, and if you have, if you download Mozilla from a computer that already has Mozilla on it, put on a flash drive, and then you can, you'll never even have to open it, explore ever.
[01:21:59.000 --> 01:22:00.000]  Mozilla.
[01:22:00.000 --> 01:22:05.000]  Yeah, Firefox. Mozilla is the company, and they make a browser called Firefox. That's what I use.
[01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:08.000]  Okay, Mozilla is Firefox or something like that?
[01:22:08.000 --> 01:22:23.000]  Mozilla is the company, and Firefox is the name of the browser. And I also instead, and don't use Outlook or Outlook Express either for your email. Mozilla makes another product called Thunderbird for email. That's what I use too.
[01:22:23.000 --> 01:22:25.000]  Alright, so I want to stick with Mozilla.
[01:22:25.000 --> 01:22:41.000]  Yeah, because you want to use third party independent software, especially that's freeware, and not Microsoft stuff because they're all, they track your information, they keep it, they report to the government, and besides there's other issues too.
[01:22:41.000 --> 01:23:00.000]  Outlook and Outlook Express and Internet Explorer are so enmeshed with the operating system of Windows that if anything goes wrong with any of those things, they all go down together, and then you lose everything. So you want to use independent third party software as much as possible.
[01:23:00.000 --> 01:23:12.000]  Yeah, see all those bad ones always, in other words, I do have, you know, occasional access to a computer that I can use. And the library is out now, you can't even go, I mean, the library has computers you can use.
[01:23:12.000 --> 01:23:29.000]  I don't know what it is about Texas, but like where I live right here, if you don't have a library card to let you use it for 30 minutes, you can use it for two hours if you have a library card, but then, I mean, you know, there you go with your, you know.
[01:23:29.000 --> 01:23:33.000]  In other words, now that I know who came in and searched, what?
[01:23:33.000 --> 01:23:48.000]  Everybody needs to get their own computer. They're so inexpensive now, and it's not that much of a learning curve, especially just to do things like search the internet, or write a document, or have email.
[01:23:48.000 --> 01:24:04.000]  Everybody really needs to have their own computer. For 200 bucks, you could have your own computer, and nowadays, the next computer I'm going to get, got like 10 computers, next computer I'm going to get is this little laptop made by this company called Acer.
[01:24:04.000 --> 01:24:22.000]  It's 300 bucks, and it's this little bitty tiny laptop. It's like an eight inch screen. It's so small, you could fit it in your purse, and it's like state of the art processor, fastest everything, 160 gig hard drive, I mean, two gigs of RAM, I mean, it's amazing.
[01:24:22.000 --> 01:24:37.000]  And I believe how cheap they can make these things. Now, Wi-Fi, the whole nine yards, that's my next, I don't even have a laptop. I have all of my stuff is like servers and desktops and everything for the network and everything else that I use personally, but for 300 bucks, you can get this Acer laptop.
[01:24:37.000 --> 01:24:55.000]  State of the art, it's small, you can practically fit it in your pocket, or your coat pocket at least. For 200 bucks, you could get a reasonably new computer at the Goodwill or other secondhand stores. If you don't have a Goodwill computer, go to computer repair shops.
[01:24:55.000 --> 01:25:15.000]  They generally sell refurbished computers too. I mean, LCD flat screen monitors now, you can pick one up for 50 bucks. I mean, for 200, $250, you can get yourself a good system, a reasonable system, and it's not that much of a learning curve. Everybody needs to have their own computer in order to stay educated.
[01:25:15.000 --> 01:25:29.000]  I'm doing a pretty good job without it, but I heard about you guys without one. All right. Well, good for you, Scott. All right. Hey, have a good night. Have a good night. I'll let you guys go home. All right. Thank you. Okay. Joe has called back in.
[01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:58.000]  Joe, were you just calling back in to listen, or do you have anything else? One other deal. What do I need to do to get to a setting for a computer ISP that will not block my Patriot emails and also when I'm sending out Patriot attachments? It looks like Yahoo and AT&T have been blocking quite a bit of my stuff.
[01:25:58.000 --> 01:26:23.000]  Well, the best thing is if you could get your own server-based email. That's what I use. Do you have a website? No, I don't. Okay, because if you have a website that's hosted on a private server, you can get email with a private server. I would suggest, so you're looking for email. Is that what you're looking for?
[01:26:23.000 --> 01:26:44.000]  Well, I send out Patriot information. And Yahoo is blocking it? Sometimes I try to receive Patriot information, and a lot of times if it's rich text or a regular document, sometimes I can't download it.
[01:26:44.000 --> 01:26:55.000]  Try going to mail.com. You can get free internet-based email there.
[01:26:55.000 --> 01:27:05.000]  Well, I got hushmail.com, but the problem with hushmail.com is you have to have a password and the person you're trying to communicate with has to know what the password is.
[01:27:05.000 --> 01:27:10.000]  Well, with mail.com you don't have that problem.
[01:27:10.000 --> 01:27:16.000]  Okay, I'll try that. But what's the cost of a cheap server in this day and time?
[01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:21.000]  12 bucks a year. No, 12 bucks. I think you can get one for about 5 bucks a month.
[01:27:21.000 --> 01:27:33.000]  Well, wait a minute. It depends on what he's looking for. If you're looking for hosting by a company that you have your domain name registered with.
[01:27:33.000 --> 01:27:40.000]  I'm not going to have to promote myself as running for office, and I'm also going to need it also for Patriot information, too.
[01:27:40.000 --> 01:27:56.000]  Well, see, here's the thing. You can get stuff from Bluehost or GoDaddy or these other places where you would register your domain name, the URL of your website, but they always have these disclaimers.
[01:27:56.000 --> 01:28:06.000]  They can't put up what they terminologize as like hate speech or these kinds of things.
[01:28:06.000 --> 01:28:16.000]  Even at the library they filter out Alex Jones' site and stuff, and so I have private server hosting. I mean totally private.
[01:28:16.000 --> 01:28:33.000]  It's my server that I have at a cab, which means a cabinet, and those kinds of server hostings, totally private servers that are not controlled by any company, that it's your server, those run about 50 bucks a month.
[01:28:33.000 --> 01:28:39.000]  Okay, and where would I go to find out about different private servers?
[01:28:39.000 --> 01:28:47.000]  Send me an email, and I will give you a list, and I'll put you in contact with the people that host my servers.
[01:28:47.000 --> 01:28:55.000]  Use my email. Go to the website. It's Deborah at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:28:55.000 --> 01:29:06.000]  And also on Alex Jones' site, PrisonPlanet.net, I believe they do server hosting for websites and email as well.
[01:29:06.000 --> 01:29:13.000]  I'm sorry? Last time I checked, it was extremely high. What? How much? I don't remember now, but it was high.
[01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:25.000]  Send me an email, and I'll put you in touch with my tech guys, because actually they're looking, they want to host more websites and email, and the email that I use is totally private on private servers.
[01:29:25.000 --> 01:29:36.000]  Can you spell your first name and your email address, please? It's D-E-B-O-R-A-H at ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:29:36.000 --> 01:29:41.000]  Wait, D-E-B? Yeah, D-E-B is the biblical spelling.
[01:29:41.000 --> 01:29:43.000]  O-R-A-H? Yes.
[01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:45.000]  Okay. At?
[01:29:45.000 --> 01:29:47.000]  Ruleoflawradio.com.
[01:29:47.000 --> 01:29:48.000]  Okay.
[01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:49.000]  Okay.
[01:29:49.000 --> 01:29:51.000]  Okay, thank you. Good night.
[01:29:51.000 --> 01:29:52.000]  All right, good night.
[01:29:52.000 --> 01:29:54.000]  I appreciate you staying up this late.
[01:29:54.000 --> 01:29:57.000]  Oh, well, we appreciate all the callers. Y'all are very diligent and committed.
[01:29:57.000 --> 01:30:03.000]  You know, I've got so many questions, there's no way you'd even finish tonight, even if you had to.
[01:30:03.000 --> 01:30:06.000]  All right, well, okay, Randy, enough. All right.
[01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:07.000]  Good night.
[01:30:07.000 --> 01:30:18.000]  All right, good night. Yeah, and y'all are all welcome to call back in, probably on Thursday, because we're going to be broadcasting live Monday evening from City Hall right here in Austin, Texas.
[01:30:18.000 --> 01:30:33.000]  Okay, thank you. Thank you guys all for listening, ladies and gentlemen, and I will be posting the archives from tonight's nearly, well, five and a half hour marathon shortly.
[01:30:33.000 --> 01:30:38.000]  No rest for the righteous, it seems.
[01:30:38.000 --> 01:30:39.000]  Good night, all.
[01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:51.000]  All right, good night, all.
[01:30:51.000 --> 01:31:13.000]  All right, good night, all.
[01:31:13.000 --> 01:31:35.000]  All right, good night, all.
[01:31:35.000 --> 01:31:57.000]  All right, good night, all.
[01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:19.000]  All right, good night, all.
[01:32:19.000 --> 01:32:41.000]  All right, good night, all.
[01:32:41.000 --> 01:33:03.000]  All right, good night, all.
[01:33:03.000 --> 01:33:25.000]  All right, good night, all.
[01:33:25.000 --> 01:33:47.000]  All right, good night, all.
[01:33:47.000 --> 01:34:09.000]  All right, good night, all.
[01:34:09.000 --> 01:34:31.000]  All right, good night, all.
[01:34:31.000 --> 01:34:53.000]  All right, good night, all.
[01:34:53.000 --> 01:35:15.000]  All right, good night, all.
[01:35:15.000 --> 01:35:37.000]  All right, good night, all.
[01:35:37.000 --> 01:35:55.000]  All right.