Rule of Law Radio Archive Search Engine

rules, Michigan rules of evidence and hearsay evidence. And then after I lost that part

And from my more recent studies, a magistrate can find probable cause based on hearsay evidence. But he must have a criminal accusation first. It must be verified. It must be filed by some credible person, not necessarily a police officer.

No, he can actually, the magistrate can find probable cause based on hearsay evidence.

Judge, I have this hearsay evidence that this person over here

No, you wouldn't. You can file a criminal complaint based on hearsay evidence

Ta-da! Now while a hearsay evidence is sufficient to give the magistrate subject matter jurisdiction

so therefore hearsay evidence cannot be presented to the judge at the examining trial.

However, it's that piece of paper is hearsay evidence because, as I was saying, we don't

Can I file a motion that this is hearsay evidence?

If I don't get a chance, if she doesn't present herself in court, then that's just hearsay evidence, right?

and the cop that was testifying against him started giving hearsay evidence.

It's hearsay evidence.

So if a certain type of evidence was improper for presentation to a pettit jury, it would also be improper here except that hearsay evidence can be presented to a grand jury.

based on hearsay evidence now show why say you live next door to me and the guy lives next to you

hearsay evidence is enough to provide a determination of probable cause and give the court jurisdiction to look into the matter. But then in order for the court to move ahead, they must have best evidence, which can't be hearsay.

And Pennsylvania hearsay evidence is more than okay to prove a prima facie case, which is all that you have to do in Pennsylvania to continue the case forward.

Whoever his witness is has to testify because the officer will only have hearsay evidence if hearsay evidence is not acceptable.

if you don't raise an issue about it. I can testify to hearsay evidence. Even though it's

In fact, the trial judge in the juvenile proceeding allowed hearsay evidence to be admitted, and

and the judge allows hearsay evidence in these family courts.

That means they can use hearsay evidence, they can use legal conclusions made by a witness

on hearsay evidence, once the indictment is forwarded to the clerk of the court in accordance

Where do you get the idea that you could get an indictment on hearsay evidence, since when

That means hearsay evidence is sufficient